Percutaneous Endoscope-assisted Visualized Implantation of Puncture Cylindrical Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation is an established technique wherein diverse electrode types are strategically implanted within the spinal epidural space for neuromodulation. Traditional percutaneous puncture cylindrical electrodes (PEs) are predominantly implanted by interventionalists utilizing a percutaneous technique under the monitor of radiation, which is a nonvisualized procedure. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of percutaneous endoscope-assisted visualized implantation approach for PEs, delineating its specific merits and demerits compared to the traditional method. STUDY DESIGN: Laboratory study with Institutional Review Board Number B2023-056SETTING: Clinical Anatomy Research Center, Fudan University. METHODS: Eight freshly procured adult cadavers (4 women and 4 men) were operated on in this study. They were divided into either Group A or Group B, each encompassing 4 cadavers. Group A was subjected to endoscope-assisted PEs implantation, whereas Group B followed the conventional PEs implantation route.In both groups the operative time of introducer needles placement (OTNP), total operative time (TOT), fluoroscopy time of introducer needles placement (FTNP), and total fluoroscopy time (TFT) were documented and analyzed. Furthermore, the precise positioning of the PEs and any ensuing complications were systematically examined. RESULTS: Both Group A and Group B successfully executed all predetermined surgical steps. A total of 16 PEs were implanted (dual electrodes in each cadaver): 8 using the percutaneous endoscope-assisted visualized approach (Group A) and 8 via the traditional methodology (Group B). Group A's mean ± SD durations for OTNP, TOT, FTNP, and TFT were 10.25 ± 1.03 minutes, 31.63 ± 5.87 minutes, 4.58 ± 1.35 seconds, and 43.73 ± 14.46 seconds, respectively. In contrast, Group B exhibited mean ± SD times of 11.55 ± 2.81 minutes, 44.75 ± 7.85 minutes, 23.53 ± 4.16 seconds, and 66.30 ± 6.35 seconds for the same metrics. No discernible statistical difference in OTNP and TOT emerged between the groups. However, Group A demonstrated reduced durations for both FTNP and TFT compared to Group B. The optimal position of the PEs was verified via fluoroscopy, with no recorded instances of dura rupture. These outcomes suggest that this endoscope-assisted technique neither increases surgical time nor compromises efficacy. Instead, it leads to a marked reduction in fluoroscopic duration relative to the traditional methodology. LIMITATIONS: Anatomical study on a human cadaver, the quantity of cadavers, and the procedure's steep learning curve. CONCLUSION: With the assistance of percutaneous spinal endoscopy, introducer needles can be punctured through the ligamentum flavum at the anticipated interlaminar window locus under direct visualization, improving the convenience of the puncture and reducing fluoroscopic exposure. It is a viable alternative for surgeons from diverse training backgrounds to implant PEs, particularly benefiting those well-versed in endoscopic spine surgery techniques.

Assessing the Effect of Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation With an Upper Limb Robotic Exoskeleton and Surface Electromyography.

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) is a promising rehabilitative intervention to restore motor function and coordination for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The effects of TSS are most commonly assessed by evaluating muscle response to stimulation using surface electromyography (sEMG). Given the increasing use of robotic devices to deliver therapy and the emerging potential of hybrid rehabilitation interventions that combine neuromodulation with robotic devices, there is an opportunity to leverage the on-board sensors of the robots to measure kinematic and torque changes of joints in the presence of stimulation. This paper explores the potential for robotic assessment of the effects of TSS delivered to the cervical spinal cord. We used a four degree-of-freedom exoskeleton to measure the torque response of upper limb (UL) joints during stimulation, while simultaneously recording sEMG. We analyzed joint torque and electromyography data generated during TSS delivered over individual sites of the cervical spinal cord in neurologically intact participants. We show that site-specific effects of TSS are manifested not only by modulation of the amplitude of spinally evoked motor potentials in UL muscles, but also by changes in torque generated by individual UL joints. We observed preferential resultant action of proximal muscles and joints with stimulation at the rostral site, and of proximal joints with rostral-lateral stimulation. Robotic assessment can be used to measure the effects of TSS, and could be integrated into complex control algorithms that govern the behavior of hybrid neuromodulation-robotic systems.

Epidural spread of surgical site infection from spinal cord stimulation trial.

We present a case of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial implantation site, resulting from an allergic reaction to an unknown agent. A 38-year-old female with complex regional pain syndrome began an SCS trial, noting 100% pain relief for 5 days. Fluid drainage from the surgical site was reported on POD6 and trial leads were removed the following day. The patient was hospitalized with sepsis. Blood cultures revealed Staphylococcus aureus. MRIs showed skin breakdown and cellulitis of the paraspinal musculature extending into the epidural space. The patient was maintained with antibiotics and rigorous wound care for 9 days and the surgical site infection resolved. The patient proceeded to SCS implantation, and reported good pain relief with the implanted device.

This case report describes the treatment of an infection developed during a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial period. SCS are medical devices used to treat pain, they work by applying electrical current to the areas of the spinal cord that cause patients' pain. Before patients get an SCS device implanted, they often undergo a trial period first. During a trial, the stimulator device stays outside the body, and only the wires carrying electricity to the spinal cord are implanted. Typically, SCS trial and implantation procedures are safe and result in effective pain relief. However, infections are a dangerous potential complication that can result from these procedures. In our case, the patient developed an infection during an SCS trial period, likely resulting from an allergic reaction to their surgical dressings. The infection traveled down the wires and nearly reached the spinal cord. Since the infection was quickly identified and managed, devastating complications were avoided. The patient was able to get a permanent SCS after the infection was resolved, and had effective pain relief. Our report emphasizes the importance of using strict infection prevention techniques, and monitoring patients for signs of infection throughout SCS trials.

Preoperative Counseling in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Designated Driver in Implantable Pulse Generator-Related Inconveniences?

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported to cause substantial pain relief and improved quality of life (QoL) in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Despite implantable pulse generator (IPG)-related inconveniences such as pain, shame, and discomfort affecting QoL and patient satisfaction, these are often neglected. Hence, the current study aims to determine the associations between patient satisfaction, IPG-related inconveniences, and preoperative counseling in a homogeneous group of patients with PSPS receiving SCS with IPG implantation in the gluteal or abdominal area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data on sample characteristics were gathered from the EPIC (electronic health record software) digital patient data base. Prospective data on patient satisfaction were obtained with a questionnaire that covered various topics such as shame, pain, disturbances in daily/intense activities, night rest and/or sleep, discomfort caused by clothing, and preoperative counseling. The exact location of the IPG and its scar were determined with photo analysis. Thereafter, the site of IPG placement was classified into separate quadrants within the gluteal and abdominal area. Patient satisfaction was defined as accepting the current location of the IPG without having the wish to undergo revision surgery. RESULTS: In total, 81 participants (50.9 ± 10 years) were included in this analysis, with patient satisfaction observed in 61 patients (75.3%). Among satisfied patients, more extensive preoperative counseling concerning IPG pain and discomfort was reported compared with patients who were not satisfied (p < 0.001). When comparing the two groups, significant differences were found in shame (8/81, 9.9%), IPG site pain (21/81, 25.9%), disturbance of activities (42/81, 51.9%), and clothing-related discomfort (42/81, 51.9%). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current results, shared decision-making and comprehensive preoperative provision of information are recommended to optimize patient satisfaction regarding IPG pain, discomfort, and inconveniences. Although many patients experience these disadvantages despite successful SCS for pain related to PSPS, most of them accept this if they have received adequate preoperative information about expectations.

Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Lead Implantation: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Results.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elucidate a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique using a biportal endoscope for the implantation of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) paddle leads and to report the preliminary results of its clinical application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The perioperative data of patients who underwent the biportal endoscopic SCS paddle lead implantation in our department were collected; the surgical procedure was delineated, and the clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: From February 2022 to December 2023, six patients underwent biportal endoscopic SCS paddle lead implantation. The median follow-up time was nine months (range one to three months). The median intraoperative blood loss was 30 mL (range 25-50 mL), and the median operative time was 87.5 minutes (range 75-110 minutes). One patient experienced severe neck pain during the operation, whereas the other five patients experienced no surgical complications. One patient was found to have a slight lead migration three months after surgery, which did not affect the therapeutic effect. The median visual analogue scale (VAS) of the surgical area was 0.5 (range 0-2), 2.5 (range 1-4), and 0.5 (range 0-1) during the operation and one day and one week after the operation, respectively. The median VAS of the six patients' primary disease was 8 (range 7-9) before surgery and 2.5 (range 1-4) at the last postoperative follow-up (pain reduction ≥50%). CONCLUSION: Paddle lead systems for SCS can be implanted successfully using a biportal endoscopic technique.

A Visual and Narrative Timeline Review of Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology and US Food and Drug Administration Milestones.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present key technologic and regulatory milestones in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for managing chronic pain on a narrative timeline with visual representation, relying on original sources to the extent possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified technical advances in SCS that facilitated and enhanced treatment on the basis of scientific publications and approvals from the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We presented milestones limited to first use in key indications and in the context of new technology validation. We focused primarily on pain management, but other indications (eg, motor disorder in multiple sclerosis) were included when they affected technology development. RESULTS: We developed a comprehensive visual and narrative timeline of SCS technology and US FDA milestones. Since its conception in the 1960s, the science and technology of SCS neuromodulation have continuously evolved. Advances span lead design (from paddle-type to percutaneous, and increased electrode contacts) and stimulator technology (from wireless power to internally powered and rechargeable, with miniaturized components, and programmable multichannel devices), with expanding stimulation program flexibility (such as burst and kilohertz stimulation frequencies), as well as usage features (such as remote programming and magnetic resonance imaging conditional compatibility). CONCLUSIONS: This timeline represents the evolution of SCS technology alongside expanding FDA-approved indications for use.

Strategies and safety simulations for ultrasonic cervical spinal cord neuromodulation.

Objective. Focused ultrasound spinal cord neuromodulation has been demonstrated in small animals. However, most of the tested neuromodulatory exposures are similar in intensity and exposure duration to the reported small animal threshold for possible spinal cord damage. All efforts must be made to minimize the risk and assure the safety of potential human studies, while maximizing potential treatment efficacy. This requires an understanding of ultrasound propagation and heat deposition within the human spine.Approach. Combined acoustic and thermal modelling was used to assess the pressure and heat distributions produced by a 500 kHz source focused to the C5/C6 level via two approaches (a) the posterior acoustic window between vertebral posterior arches, and (b) the lateral intervertebral foramen from which the C6 spinal nerve exits. Pulse trains of fifty 0.1 s pulses (pulse repetition frequency: 0.33 Hz, free-field spatial peak pulse-averaged intensity: 10 W cm-2) were simulated for four subjects and for ±10 mm translational and ±10∘rotational source positioning errors.Main results.Target pressures ranged between 20%-70% of free-field spatial peak pressures with the posterior approach, and 20%-100% with the lateral approach. When the posterior source was optimally positioned, peak spine heating values were below 1 ∘C, but source mispositioning resulted in bone heating up to 4 ∘C. Heating with the lateral approach did not exceed 2 ∘C within the mispositioning range. There were substantial inter-subject differences in target pressures and peak heating values. Target pressure varied three to four-fold between subjects, depending on approach, while peak heating varied approximately two-fold between subjects. This results in a nearly ten-fold range between subjects in the target pressure achieved per degree of maximum heating.Significance. This study highlights the utility of trans-spine ultrasound simulation software and need for precise source-anatomy positioning to assure the subject-specific safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound spinal cord therapies.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead Revision and Replacement for Misplaced or Displaced Electrodes.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are commonly implanted via a laminotomy or laminectomy. Revision surgery may be necessary in instances of hardware failure or loss of efficacy. It is uncommon for leads to have been initially misplaced in a suboptimal position and revision in these cases necessitates additional dissection for appropriate repositioning. Accordingly, there is concern with a more extensive revision for a potentially higher risk of associated complications. This study aims to describe a series of patients with failed paddle SCS electrodes due to misplacement who underwent revision and replacement. METHODS: Patients who underwent SCS paddle replacement for misplaced paddles between 2021 and 2023 were identified. Medical charts were reviewed for demographic data, operative details, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent thoracic SCS paddle revision and replacement. The mean age was 59.6 ± 12.6 years, with 11 females and 5 males. Misplaced paddles were too lateral (n = 12), too high (n = 2), or incompletely within the epidural space (n = 2). The mean duration from initial implantation to revision surgery was 44.8 ± 47.5 months. The mean operative duration was 126.1 ± 26.9 minutes and all patients required a "skip" laminectomy or laminotomy. No complications were encountered. The mean length of follow-up was 18.4 ± 7.3 months. Mean preoperative pain intensity was 7.9 ± 1.5 and at last follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.7 (P < 0.001). All but 1 patient continued to use their device in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The revision and replacement of misplaced paddle SCS electrodes is a feasible and durable revision strategy, even in long-term implants with extensive scarring.

Prospective Six-Month Analysis of Multiarea Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Correlating Intraoperative Neuromonitoring With Postoperative Programming and Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: DeRidder burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown superior relief from overall pain to traditional tonic neurostimulation therapies and a reduction in back and leg pain. However, nearly 80% of patients have two or more noncontiguous pain areas. This affects the ability to effectively program stimulation and deliver long-term efficacy of the therapy. Multiple DeRidder burst region programming is an option to treat multisite pain by interleaving stimulation at multiple areas along the spinal cord. Previous intraoperative neuromonitoring studies have shown that DeRidder burst stimulation provides broader myotomal coverage at a lower recruitment threshold. The goal of this study is to correlate intraoperative electromyogram (EMG) threshold and postsynaptic excitability with postoperative paresthesia thresholds and optimal burst stimulation programming. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neuromonitoring was performed during permanent implant of SCS leads in ten patients diagnosed with chronic intractable back and/or leg pain. Each patient underwent the surgical placement of a Penta Paddle electrode through laminectomy at the T8-T11 spinal levels. Subdermal electrode needles were placed into lower extremity muscle groups, in addition to the rectus abdominis muscles, for EMG recording. Evoked responses were compared across multiple trials of burst stimulation in which the number of independent burst areas was varied. After intraoperative data collection, all patients were programmed with single- and multiarea DeRidder burst. Intermittent dosing was delivered at 30:90, 120:360, 120:720, and 120:1440 (seconds ON/OFF) intervals. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Patient Global Impression of Change scores were evaluated at one, two, three, four, and six months after permanent implant. RESULTS: The thresholds for EMG recruitment after DeRidder burst differed across all patients owing to anatomical and physiological variations. After a 30-second dose of stimulation, the average decrease in thresholds was 1.25 mA for two-area and 0.9 mA for four-area DeRidder burst. Furthermore, a 30-second dose of multisite DeRidder burst produced a 0.25 mA reduction in the postoperative paresthesia thresholds. Across all patients, the baseline NRS score was 6.5 ± 0.5, and the NRS score after single or multiarea DeRidder burst therapy was 2.87 ± 1.50. Eight of ten patients reported a ≥50% decrease in their pain scores through the six-month follow-up visit. Pain outcomes using intermittent multiarea stimulation with longer OFF times (120:360, 120:720, 120:1440) were comparable to those using single-area DeRidder burst at 30:90 up to six months after implant with patient preference being two-area DeRidder burst. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to evaluate the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring to optimize stimulation programming for multisite pain and correlate it with postoperative programming and efficacy. These results suggest that multisite programming can be used to further customize DeRidder burst stimulation to each individual patient and improve outcomes and quality of life for patients receiving SCS therapy for multisite pain.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Electrodes Rapidly Produce Epidural Scarring, Impeding Surgical Paddle Lead Placement.

OBJECTIVES: After a successful percutaneous cylindrical electrode five-to-seven-day trial of spinal cord stimulation, subsequent permanent surgical paddle lead (SPL) placement can be impeded by epidural scar induced by the trial leads (TLs). Our goal was to determine whether a delay between TL and subsequent SPL placement provokes enhanced epidural scarring with an increased need for laminotomy extension required for scar removal for optimal SPL placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained data base, a single-facility/surgeon retrospective study identified 261 patients with newly placed thoracolumbar SPLs from June 2013 to November 2023. Data were obtained from the patients' charts, including, but not limited to, timing between TL and SPL, operative time, and need for extension of laminotomy. RESULTS: We found that the need for laminotomy extension due to TL epidural scarring and longer operative times was not required in our patients if the SPL was placed within ten days of placement of the TL (0/26), leading to shorter operative times in those with SPL placed after ten days (122.42 ± 10.72 minutes vs 140.75 ± 4.72 minutes; p = 0.005). We found no association with other medical comorbidities that may be confounding factors leading to epidural scarring/extension of laminotomy or association with level of SPL placement, size of the spinal canal, or indication for SPL placement. CONCLUSIONS: TL placement leads to scarring in the epidural space that appears to mature after ten days of its placement. In approximately 34% of patients, this leads to prolonged operative time owing to the need for extension of laminotomy and subsequent clearing of epidural scar for optimal SPL placement.

Restoration of sensory feedback from the foot and reduction of phantom limb pain via closed-loop spinal cord stimulation.

Restoring somatosensory feedback in individuals with lower-limb amputations would reduce the risk of falls and alleviate phantom limb pain. Here we show, in three individuals with transtibial amputation (one traumatic and two owing to diabetic peripheral neuropathy), that sensations from the missing foot, with control over their location and intensity, can be evoked via lateral lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation with commercially available electrodes and by modulating the intensity of stimulation in real time on the basis of signals from a wireless pressure-sensitive shoe insole. The restored somatosensation via closed-loop stimulation improved balance control (with a 19-point improvement in the composite score of the Sensory Organization Test in one individual) and gait stability (with a 5-point improvement in the Functional Gait Assessment in one individual). And over the implantation period of the stimulation leads, the three individuals experienced a clinically meaningful decrease in phantom limb pain (with an average reduction of nearly 70% on a visual analogue scale). Our findings support the further clinical assessment of lower-limb neuroprostheses providing somatosensory feedback.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Migration With or Without Loss of Efficacy: A Retrospective Review of 91 Consecutive Thoracic Lead Implants.

OBJECTIVE: Lead migration after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implant is a commonly reported complication and the most common reason for revision surgery in cases of loss of efficacy. The primary aims of this study are to describe the incidence and degree of lead migration in the subacute postoperative period after SCS implant and to report potential risk factors for lead migration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients at a single academic center who received an SCS implant from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Information on patient (age, sex, weight, and height) and operative factors (device manufacturer, epidural access level and method, and implantable pulse generator location) were extracted from medical records. Intraoperative imaging was compared to subacute follow-up imaging obtained less than 20 days postimplant to measure lead migration distance. Regression models were fitted to determine associations between lead migration distance and potential clinical risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 91 cases (182 leads) were included in the study. Within 20 days of implantation, 88.5% of leads had migrated (86.3% caudal and 2.2% cephalad). Mean migration distance for leads with caudal migration only was 12.34 ± 12.19 mm based on anteroposterior radiographs and 16.95 ± 15.68 mm on lateral radiographs. There was an association of greater caudal lead migration as patient body mass index increased (ß-coefficient 0.07 [95% confidence interval 0.01-0.13], p = 0.031). Within the entire cohort, one patient (1.1%) required lead revision for loss of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In the subacute postoperative period after SCS implant, the majority of SCS leads migrated caudally with an average of two lead contacts. Knowledge of this expected migration and risk factors can better inform implanting physicians intraoperatively when deciding final lead placement location. The finding of high likelihood of caudal lead migration in the subacute postoperative period brings the need for a well-designed prospective study to the forefront of our field. This will allow implanting providers to make well-informed decisions for intraoperative lead placement.

The Role of Vancomycin Powder During Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the role of intrawound vancomycin powder as prophylaxis against postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive patients who had undergone permanent SCS implantation surgery via open laminectomy between 2014 and 2020. We queried the patients' medical records for patient age, sex, relevant medical history, and whether intrawound vancomycin had been administered. We compared the rates of SSI (primary outcome) and seroma (secondary outcome) within 3 months after surgery between the vancomycin and no-vancomycin groups. Finally, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify independent predictors of postoperative SSI or seroma. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients, 59% were women, and the average age was 65.4 years. Overall, 3 patients (2%) had developed an SSI: 2 (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella) in the vancomycin group and 1 (methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in the no-vancomycin group. This difference in SSI rate between the 2 groups was insignificant (P = 0.73). Three seromas, all in the no-vancomycin group, accounted for a statistically significant difference in seroma formation between the 2 groups (P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression failed to identify any perioperative characteristics as independent predictors of postoperative SSI or seroma. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests open laminectomy for SCS implantation surgery can be performed with a low postoperative SSI rate, with or without the use of powdered vancomycin. We found no evidence suggesting that the use of powdered vancomycin is unsafe or related to postoperative seroma formation. We failed to draw any definitive conclusions regarding its efficacy, despite referencing the largest single case series of SCS implantation to date.

Placement of Surgical Spinal Cord Stimulation Leads Using Spinal Process Splitting Laminotomy: Technical Note.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation has become an established method within the therapy of chronic pain allowing for significant pain relief. Surgical leads usually must be implanted via a surgical procedure involving unilateral or bilateral muscle detachment and partial laminectomy. METHODS: We present the application of a novel minimal invasive microsurgical approach for lead placement, which combines the beneficial advantages of anatomic midline lead placement while preserving the midline structures, avoiding muscle detachments, and thus ensuring spinal stability: spinal process splitting laminotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The spinal process splitting laminotomy technique can be successfully applied to introduce the surgical leads for spinal cord stimulation.

Lead Migration in Neuromodulation.

We describe a simple technique of securing surgically implanted leads for spinal cord (SCS), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), for both primary surgical implantation and correcting lead migration. This technique could also be adapted for securing percutaneously implanted leads. Thirty-nine patients underwent neurosurgical implantation of SCS, DRG, and ONS devices utilizing titanium mini-plates to obtain secure anchorage of leads to adjacent laminae close to their exit point from the epidural space, thereby minimizing the risk of further lead migration or electrode displacement. There were no cases of primary or recurrent lead migration in any patient undergoing lead placement using mini-plate anchorage. The technique appears to offer a reliable means of preventing post-operative lead migration in a variety of spinal and extra-cranial neuromodulation implants.

Recruitment of upper-limb motoneurons with epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of lumbosacral sensorimotor circuits improves leg motor control in animals and humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Upper-limb motor control involves similar circuits, located in the cervical spinal cord, suggesting that EES could also improve arm and hand movements after quadriplegia. However, the ability of cervical EES to selectively modulate specific upper-limb motor nuclei remains unclear. Here, we combined a computational model of the cervical spinal cord with experiments in macaque monkeys to explore the mechanisms of upper-limb motoneuron recruitment with EES and characterize the selectivity of cervical interfaces. We show that lateral electrodes produce a segmental recruitment of arm motoneurons mediated by the direct activation of sensory afferents, and that muscle responses to EES are modulated during movement. Intraoperative recordings suggested similar properties in humans at rest. These modelling and experimental results can be applied for the development of neurotechnologies designed for the improvement of arm and hand control in humans with quadriplegia.

Efficacy of different spinal cord stimulation paradigms for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain (PARS-trial): study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective method to treat neuropathic pain; however, it is challenging to compare different stimulation modalities in an individual patient, and thus, it is largely unknown which of the many available SCS modalities is most effective. Specifically, electrodes leading out through the skin would have to be consecutively connected to different, incompatible SCS devices and be tested over a time period of several weeks or even months. The risk of wound infections for such a study would be unacceptably high and blinding of the trial difficult. The PARS-trial seizes the capacity of a new type of wireless SCS device, which enables a blinded and systematic intra-patient comparison of different SCS modalities over extended time periods and without increasing wound infection rates. METHODS: The PARS-trial is designed as a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled multi-center crossover study. It will compare the clinical effectiveness of the three most relevant SCS paradigms in individual patients. The trial will recruit 60 patients suffering from intractable neuropathic pain of the lower extremities, who have been considered for SCS therapy and were already implanted with a wireless SCS device prior to study participation. Over a time period of 35 days, patients will be treated consecutively with three different SCS paradigms ("burst," "1 kHz," and "1.499 kHz") and placebo stimulation. Each SCS paradigm will be applied for 5 days with a washout period of 70 h between stimulation cycles. The primary endpoint of the study is the level of pain self-assessment on the visual analogue scale after 5 days of SCS. Secondary, exploratory endpoints include self-assessment of pain quality (as determined by painDETECT questionnaire), quality of life (as determined by Quality of Life EQ-5D-5L questionnaire), anxiety perception (as determined by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and physical restriction (as determined by the Oswestry Disability Index). DISCUSSION: Combining paresthesia-free SCS modalities with wireless SCS offers a unique opportunity for a blinded and systematic comparison of different SCS modalities in individual patients. This trial will advance our understanding of the clinical effectiveness of the most relevant SCS paradigms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00018929 . Registered on 14 January 2020.

Retrospective analysis on the effect of spinal cord stimulation on opioid consumption.

Aim: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to clinically manage and/or treat several chronic pain etiologies. A limited amount is known about the influence on patients' use of opioid pain medication. This retrospective analysis evaluated SCS effect on opioid consumption in patients presenting with chronic pain conditions. Materials & methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent a temporary trial device, permanent implant or both. Patients were divided for assessment based on the nature of their procedure(s). Primary outcome was change in morphine equivalent dose (MED), ascertained from preoperative and postoperative medication reports. Results: Postoperative MED was significantly lower in patients who received some form of neuromodulation therapy. Pretrial patients reported an average MED of 41.01 ± 10.23 mg per day while post-trial patients reported an average of 13.30 ± 5.34 mg per day (p < 0.001). Pre-implant patients reported an average MED of 39.14 ± 13.52 mg per day while post-implant patients reported an average MED of 20.23 ± 9.01 mg per day (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between pre-trial and pre-implant MED, nor between post-trial and post-implant MED. Of the 42 study subjects who reported some amount of pre-intervention opioid use, 78.57% indicated a lower MED (n = 33; p < 0.001), 16.67% indicated no change (n = 7) and 4.76% (n = 2) indicated a higher MED, following intervention. Moreover, SCS therapy resulted in a 26.83% reduction (p < 0.001) in the number of patients with MED >50 mg per day. Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation may reduce opioid use when implemented appropriately. Neuromodulation may represent alternative therapy for alleviating chronic pain which may avoid a number of deleterious side effects commonly associated with opioid consumption.

Effects of Lower Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Bowel Management in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically determine whether use of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system to restore cough may improve bowel management (BM) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Experimental studies (clinical trial). SETTING: Inpatient hospital setting for electrode insertion; outpatient setting for measurement of respiratory pressures; home setting for application of SCS. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=5) with cervical SCI. INTERVENTION: A fully implantable SCS cough system was surgically placed in each subject. SCS was applied at home, 2-3 times/d, on a chronic basis, every time bowel regimen was performed and as needed for secretion management. Stimulus parameters were set at values resulting in near maximum airway pressure generation, which was used as an index of expiratory muscle strength. Participants also used SCS during their bowel routine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Airway pressure generation achieved with SCS. Weekly completion of Bowel Routine Log including BM time, mechanical measures, and medications used. RESULTS: Mean pressure during spontaneous efforts was 30±8 cmH2O. After a period of reconditioning, SCS resulted in pressure of 146±21 cmH2O. The time required for BM routines was reduced from 118±34 minutes to 18±2 minutes (P<.05) and was directly related to the magnitude of pressure development during SCS. Mechanical methods for BM were completely eliminated in 4 patients. No patients experienced fecal incontinence as result of SCS. Each participant also reported marked overall improvement associated with BM. CONCLUSIONS: Our results of this pilot study suggest that SCS to restore cough may be a useful method to improve BM and life quality for both patients with SCI and their caregivers. Our results indicate that the improvement in BM is secondary to restoration of intra-abdominal pressure development.