Rectal Perforation by an Intrauterine Device Leading to Fatal Intra-Abdominal Sepsis and Necrotizing Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal injury from an intrauterine device (IUD) is rare but may lead to major complications. CASE: A 55-year-old woman presented to a tertiary care hospital with 4 days of generalized weakness, confusion, dysuria, and lower back pain. She provided a vague history of an unsuccessful attempt to remove an IUD 30 years prior. A computed tomography scan demonstrated an IUD in the rectal lumen, with gluteal and pelvic gas and fluid collections. Emergency surgery found necrotizing fasciitis. Despite multiple debridements, sigmoidoscopic IUD removal, and long-term intravenous antibiotics, the patient died from sepsis and multiorgan failure. CONCLUSION: IUDs require proper monitoring and timely removal to prevent potential complications associated with organ perforation.

Clinical characteristics of perforated pyometra and impending perforation: specific issues in gynecological emergency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of pyometra and the differences between perforated pyometra and early-drained pyometra in order to prevent morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 14 patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2008 with early-drainage pyometra and six patients with perforated pyometra were included. In addition, a review of the literature yielded another 30 perforated pyometra cases for comparison. RESULTS: Of 20 women with pyometra, the main presented symptoms at admission were abdominal pain (80%), fever (45%) and vaginal discharge (25%). The majority of organisms isolated were Bacteroides fragilis (seven cases), Streptococcus species (six cases) and Escherichia coli (five cases). Of the 36 cases with spontaneous uterine perforation to date, 35 cases (97%) had abdominal pain, 11 cases (31%) had fever, and 10 cases (27%) had vomiting. Hypoalbuminemia was found in seven patients (five cases in the perforation group and two cases in the drainage group). CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of pyometra before perforation can avoid surgical exploration and decrease morbidity and mortality. Perforated pyometra should be considered as a differential diagnosis in women with pneumoperitoneum and fever. Hypoalbuminemia should be considered as a predisposing factor for pyometra perforation.

Computed tomography features of spontaneously perforated pyometra: a case report.

Spontaneous perforation of pyometra is an extremely rare emergent gynecologic disease. We report a 73-year-old woman with a spontaneously perforated pyometra presenting with acute abdomen in the emergency department. A dedicated computed tomography examination of the abdominal and pelvic regions revealed the diagnosis. The patient recovered well after surgical intervention and antibiotic treatment.

Uterine perforation with Lippes loop intrauterine device-associated actinomycosis: a case report and review of the literature.

A case of a 67-year-old postmenopausal woman, gravida 2, para 2, with an uterine perforation from actinomycotic infection with Lippes loop IUD is reported. She had the Lippes loop IUD inserted for 35 years, and had never had any pelvic examination nor Papanicolaou smear. She presented with acute abdominal pain. The clinical picture mimicked peptic ulcer perforation. The woman underwent laparotomy and exudative fluid was discovered in the abdominal cavity with the tip of the Lippes loop IUD at one of the two small holes of the uterine fundus. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The postoperative microscopic pathological report demonstrated characteristics of actinomycosis. She was treated with parenteral high-dose penicillin for 4 weeks followed by oral penicillin for 6 months. The woman had an uneventful recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of uterine perforation due to Lippes loop IUD-associated actinomycotic infection.