Cost-benefit of anthelmintic protocols in naturally infected sheep
Balzan, Alexandre; Cazarotto, Chrystian Jassanã; Machado, Gustavo; Grosskopf, Rhayana Kharyna; Simioni, Flavio José; Stefani, Lenita Moura; Silva, Aleksandro Schafer da.
Acta sci. vet. (Online);
42: Pub. 1230, Nov. 19, 2014. graf
Artigo
em Inglês
| VETINDEX
| ID: vti-30775
Resumo
Background: Gastrointestinal nematode infections are a major problem for sheep production, leading to large economic losses as a result of the high costs for prevention and treatment. In helminthiasis, the most common clinical signs are weight loss, submandibular edema, diarrhea, and anemia. Among the many nematodes, stands out in the Brazilian states Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis, as well as these parasites have developed a number of anthelmintic resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-benefit of different antihelminthic protocols in naturally infected sheep.Material, Methods & Results: The study was conducted for one year in a sheep farm located in Southern Brazil. Three groups (A, B and C) with 10 adult sheep each were used. The group A was treated without drug rotation, and levamisole hydrochloride was used at intervals of 60 days. The group B was treated with levamisole hydrochloride at months 2, 4, 8 and 12 and albendazole at month 6 (antiparasitic treatment with pharmacological rotation). Animals from the group C were treated after selection by the Famacha method, which is based on the degree of anemia of their mucous ocular membranes. The results showed that the animals of the group C had lower values of eggs per gram of feces (EPG), and thus, they were treated more efficiently...(AU)
Biblioteca responsável:
BR68.1
Localização: BR68.1
Texto completo