Outcomes of Exeter cemented total hip arthroplasty in a county hospital: survivorship of eight hundred and ninety four hips with a minimum ten-year follow up.

PURPOSE: A total of 894 hips were evaluated to describe the survivorship of Exeter cemented femoral stems and report the outcomes and complications of our 'Exeter- era', and there is no study from Central or Eastern Europe demonstrating similar results. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2009, a total of 894 hips were included who underwent Exeter universal and V40 femoral stems with a mean follow up of 13 years. Cemented Exeter low profile polyethylene cups were used in 889 patients (99.4%) cups. Harris hip score (HHS) was used and statistical outcome measures were calculated with revision as an endpoint for aseptic loosening of the stem, aseptic loosening of any component, all-cause revision of the stem, and all-cause revision of the hip. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients died and 129 (14.4%) operated hips were lost to follow-up before ten years. Out of the 662, ten stems (1.5%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening of any component was the reason for revision in 43 cases (6.5%), consisting of 40 cup revisions and ten stem exchanges. Periprosthetic fracture occurred in 17 cases (1.9%) Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 18 cases (2.01%). Three cups were exchanged for recurrent dislocation, and two stems had broken. CONCLUSION: Exeter hip system has provided reproducible results across different centres worldwide, as it did in our series. Thorough surgical and cementing technique is of utmost importance for achieving these results. The cup is the weak point of the system and use of a hybrid system is worth considering.

Diagnostic utility of open biopsy in patients with two culture-negative aspirations in the diagnostic work-up of periprosthetic joint infection.

INTRODUCTION: Different approaches have been proposed for bacterial identification in patients with a suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). If a one-stage procedure is considered, a higher rate of preoperative bacterial identification can be achieved if biopsy is included in the diagnostic work-up. The performance of open biopsy (OB) in the context of PJI has not been clearly determined yet. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of an OB added to two consecutive culture-negative joint aspirations during PJI workup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the OB data from a single institution. Patients under PJI work-up of the hip or knee with two culture-negative periprosthetic aspirations who underwent OB were included. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the musculoskeletal infection society (MSIS) criteria as gold standard. Patients undergoing urgent irrigation and debridement and patients with history of surgery to the affected joint in the prior 6 weeks were excluded. RESULTS: 126 patients were included in this study. 62 (49.2%) patients had prior revisions, 48 of them due to PJI. The sensitivity and specificity of OB was 69.4% and 89.1%, respectively. The OB procedure led to the identification of the causative germ in 50 out of 126 (40%) cases so they could undergo one-stage (septic) exchange. CONCLUSION: The OB is a valuable resource if preoperative synovial fluid cultures are negative, a high suspicion of infection persists and a one-stage procedure is preferred. It intends bacteria identification and allows surgeons to evaluate prosthetic complications for further surgical procedures.

What Is the Dislocation and Revision Rate of Dual-mobility Cups Used in Complex Revision THAs?

BACKGROUND: Dual-mobility cups have been shown to reduce the dislocation risk after THA. Although dual-mobility cups can be a useful strategy to mitigate against recurrent dislocation after revision surgery, few clinical studies have focused on the results of complex revision THAs with extensive bone and soft-tissue loss or in patients who have undergone more than one previous surgical procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the survival free from revision for dislocation of dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THAs? (2) What is the survival free from any dislocation? METHODS: Between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013, 327 patients underwent a complex revision THA that included an acetabular revision, defined as preexisting massive bone loss in the acetabulum (at least Paprosky Type 2B) and/or proximal femur (at least Paprosky Type 3), substantial gluteal soft-tissue involvement, at least two previous surgical procedures or a one-stage septic revision, or history of dislocation. All 327 complex revision patients received a dual-mobility cup. Of those, 34% (111) were lost to follow-up before 5 years and were not known to have reached a study endpoint (revision for dislocation, and any dislocation) before then, leaving 216 patients for analysis. For patients with bilateral hip surgeries only the first operated hip was included for analysis. The median (range) follow-up duration was 69 months (60 to 110). The primary endpoint was dislocation or re-revision for dislocation. Fifty-six percent (120 of 216) of the patients were women and 44% (96 of 216) were men. The mean age of the patients was 69 ± 9 years. The patients underwent a median of four surgical procedures (1 to 4) before the index procedure (the revision evaluated in this study). A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; any dislocation or revision for dislocation was determined as the endpoint. RESULTS: The dislocation-free survival rates were 96% (95% confidence interval 92 to 98) at 5 years and 82% (95% CI 72 to 89) at 9 years. The overall dislocation rate was 11% (24 of 216 patients) at the final follow-up interval. Survival free of revision for dislocation was 99% (95% CI 96 to 100) at 5 years and 85% (95% CI 75 to 92) at 9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THA in this series had a higher rate of dislocation and revision than expected, based on earlier studies of dislocations of these components. Although we believe dual-mobility cups are still the first choice of implant if the patient has instability, these cups should be used cautiously if severe bone loss or soft-tissue involvement is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Alpha-Defensin and Leukocyte Esterase Test in Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is challenging, especially in patients with Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes infection. Despite the increasing number of patients with PJI of the shoulder, there are still no robust data regarding diagnostic tests in detecting shoulder PJI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the sensitivity, specificity, and negative- and positive-predictive values for the alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test in detecting PJI after TSA? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies in detecting shoulder PJI for synovial alpha-defensin, leukocyte esterase Test, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP)? METHODS: All patients with painful TSA, who underwent joint aspiration to validate or exclude a PJI, between July 2015 and February 2018 were enrolled in this single-center study. Further indications for aspiration were as follows: planned revision arthroplasty, early loosening and clinical signs of infections, especially serum CRP elevation. A total of 121 patients were aspirated to exclude or verify a PJI, and 16 patients were excluded. In all, 105 patients with a mean age of 68 years (± 12 years) were included for analysis. Patients who underwent TSA were considered aseptic or septic according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Twenty-four patients had a PJI, and the remaining 81 patients were in the aseptic group. The microbiologic evaluation including polymicrobial infection showed C. (formerly P.) acnes in 15 patients (63%). Synovial fluid was then analyzed using microbiology cultures, alpha-defensin immunoassay, and leukocyte esterase. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive-predictive and negative-predictive values were calculated for each test. RESULTS: The overall accuracy for alpha-defensin was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.4-96); sensitivity was 75% (95% CI, 53-90), specificity was 96% (95% CI, 90-99), negative predictive value was 93% (95% CI, 85-97), and positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI, 64-97). In contrast, the overall accuracy for leukocyte esterase was 76% (95% CI, 61-88), sensitivity was 50% (95% CI, 21-79), specificity was 87% (95% CI, 69-96), positive predictive value 60% (95% CI, 26-88) and negative predictive value was 81% (95% CI, 64-93). CONCLUSIONS: Summarizing the study results, the alpha-defensin ELISA and leukocyte esterase tests had less sensitivity in detecting shoulder PJI than previously reported TKA or THA results. The quality and low amount of joint fluid is the difficult part of the diagnostic. C. (formerly P.) acnes was the most common cause of PJI. Focusing on low-grade infections, alpha-defensin has shown its advantages in diagnosing PJI regardless pathogen virulence. Since the diagnostic of a PJI is always a synopsis of findings, the alpha-defensin and leukocyte esterase test can be used as adjunct diagnostic tool in patients with painful TSA. We propose further prospective studies to improve the diagnostic and confirm the results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Ten-Year Results Following One-Stage Septic Hip Exchange in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Although 2-stage revision is still considered the gold standard for surgical management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), 1-stage revision has been reported to be as effective. Long-term reports for 1-stage revision in hip PJIs are lacking. METHODS: We reviewed our 10-11 years of results of 85 patients who underwent 1-stage exchange of the hip with an antibiotic-loaded bone cemented prosthesis due to PJI to determine the following: (1) What is the infection-free survival? (2) What is the overall survival? and (3) What are the long-term clinical outcomes? All 1-stage revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for infection between January 2006 and December 2007, with a minimum 10-year follow-up (range 10-11), were included in this retrospective cohort. Patients from another country or patients who were unable to participate were excluded. Eighty-five patients with a hip PJI were available at the last follow-up. Thirty-seven patients died during the 10-year study. Harris Hip Scores were recorded before the surgery and at last follow-up. Failures are reported as infection-related or aseptic. RESULTS: The 10-year infection-free survival was 94% and the surgery-free survival was 75.9%. The Harris Hip Scores improved from 43 (range 3-91) to 75 (range 10-91) (P < .001). The main indication for re-revision after 1-stage exchange was instability (10/20 patients). CONCLUSION: One-stage exchange of the hip for PJI is a reliable treatment option with high rate of infection control and long-lasting favorable outcomes.

Persistent Wound Drainage After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Persistent wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an important complication with potential substantial adverse consequences, in particular periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: This review evaluated the available literature regarding several issues in the field of persistent wound drainage after TJA and offers a classification of persistent wound drainage and an algorithmic approach to the decision-making process. RESULTS: Available literature addressing the diagnosis and treatment of persistent wound drainage after TJA is scarce and an evidence-based clinical guideline is lacking. This is partially caused by the absence of a universally accepted definition of persistent wound drainage. In patients with persistent wound drainage, clinical signs and serological tests can be helpful in the diagnosis of a developing infection. Regarding the treatment of persistent wound drainage, nonsurgical treatment consists of absorbent dressings, pressure bandages, and temporary joint immobilization. Surgical treatment is advised when wound drainage persists for more than 5-7 days and consists of open debridement with irrigation and exchange of modular components and antimicrobial treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on this literature review, we proposed a classification and algorithmic approach for the management of patients with persistent wound drainage after TJA. Hopefully, this offers the orthopedic surgeon a practical clinical guideline by finding the right balance between overtreatment and undertreatment, weighing the risks and benefits. However, this classification and algorithmic approach should first be evaluated in a prospective trial.

Interprosthetic Femoral Sleeves in Revision Arthroplasty: A 20-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Interprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with ipsilateral stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be technically demanding to treat surgically. Nonunion and implant failure are among the main complications following fixation of interprosthetic femoral (IF) fractures. Total femoral arthroplasty (TFA) is associated with a high incidence of infection and instability. IF sleeves have been designed to avoid the disadvantages of these techniques and to provide a stable construct. The aim of this study was to present the results with this device from a single center. METHODS: We reviewed 26 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty procedures, using custom-made cemented IF sleeves between 1997 and December 2017 in our institution. Two-part sleeves were used in 18 patients and one-part sleeves in 8 patients. The most common indication was an IF fracture (18 patients). Patients were monitored for postoperative complications, implant failure, and re-revision. The minimum follow-up of the survivors with nonrevised sleeves was 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included for the final analysis. The mean survivorship of the IF sleeve was 4.6 years at latest follow-up (mean 48.5 months; range 12 to 156). The overall rate of complications was 47.8%. The rate of mechanical failure was 21.7%. Late infections occurred in 3 patients (13%). At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 69.9 points (range 39 to 94), and the mean functional Knee Society Score was 42.5 points (range 0 to 90), with average knee flexion of 95° (range 90° to 100°). CONCLUSION: The IF sleeve is a valid technique for the management of selected patients with IF fractures, particularly when a stable fracture fixation is not possible. Hip instability is not a concern, and functional improvement is achievable. Careful planning is required preoperatively to avoid mechanical failure.

Blood loss and allogeneic transfusion for surgical treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a comparison of one- vs. two-stage exchange total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to compare the blood loss and the need for allogeneic transfusion after one- and two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of THA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing either one-stage or two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty at two high-volume infection referral centres. The study cohort consists of 90 patients undergoing the two-stage and 184 patients the one-stage exchange arthroplasty. The difference between pre- and post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) and total blood loss as well as the allogeneic transfusion rate were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Both procedures together of the two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty had higher intra-operative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion rate compared to the one-stage septic exchange arthroplasty group. However, among the patients of the two-stage group, there were more smokers and had worse physical status (ASA) and higher mortality risk (CCI) than patients in the one-stage group. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage septic revision of total hip arthroplasty has higher rates of blood loss and transfusion rates than one-stage revision. Therefore, the authors believe that blood loss rate, including its complications, should be considered when decision for the type of staged septic exchange is made.

How Reliable Is the Cell Count Analysis in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND: Synovial analysis of joint aspirates is a key diagnostic tool; all major diagnostic algorithms include cell count (CC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as important criteria to make the diagnosis. In this context, we conducted this study to analyze the overall accuracy of CC and PMN%. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed with clinical data of included patients, with a total of 524 preoperative joint aspirations (255 hips, 269 knees). From the aspirated synovial fluid, we tested the leukocyte esterase activity, leukocyte CC, and PMN%, and sent specimens for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture. Depending on the clinical results in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for prosthetic joint infection (PJI), 203 patients were then admitted for aseptic revision and 134 patients for septic exchange. RESULTS: In 337 cases (64.3% of the study patients), it was possible to measure the CC. The best cutoff level for PJI of all study patients was 2582 leukocytes/µL (sensitivity [SE] 80.6%, specificity [SP] 85.2%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 80.6%, SP 83.3%). The chosen cutoff levels for PJI of total knee and total hip arthroplasty were 1630 leukocytes/µL (SE 83.6%, SP 82.2%) and a PMN% of 60.5% (SE 80.3%, SP 77.1%) and 3063 leukocytes/µL (SE 78.1%, SP 80.0%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (SE 82.2%, SP 82.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CC and PMN% are sensitive methods for diagnosing PJI of total hip and total knee arthroplasty. However, there are differences in cutoff levels between knees and hips. International guidelines and diagnostic criteria need revisions in terms of these parameters.

High bacterial contamination rate of electrocautery tips during total hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to quantify the bacterial contamination rate of electrocautery tips during primary total joint replacement (TJR), as well as during aseptic and septic revision TJR. METHODS: A total of 150 electrocautery tips were collected between April and July 2017. TJR surgeries were divided into three groups: (1) primary, (2) aseptic and (3) septic revisions. In each group, a total of 50 electrocautery tips were collected. A monopolar electrocautery with a reusable stainless-steel blade tip was used in all cases. The rate of bacterial contamination was determined for all groups. Correlation of exposure time and type of surgery was analyzed. RESULTS: The overall bacterial contamination rate was 14.7% (95% CI 9.4 to 21.4%). The highest contamination rate occurred in the septic revision group (30.0%; 95% CI 17.9 to 44.6%), followed by the primary cases group (10.0%; 95% CI 3.3 to 21.8%) and the aseptic revision group (4.0%; 95% CI 0.5 to 13.7%). Exposure time did not affect the bacterial contamination rate. In 12 out of 15 (80%) contaminations identified in the septic group, we found the same causative microorganism of the prosthetic joint infection on the electrocautery tip. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial contamination of the electrocautery tips is relatively high, especially during septic hip revision arthroplasty. Electrocautery tips should be changed after debridement of infected tissue.

Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical failure due to dislocation, fracture and acetabular wear is a major complication associated with the use of spacers in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We have developed a novel custom-made spacer in the setting of two-stage septic revision hip arthroplasty and present the preliminary results of our technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2015 and November 2017, 30 patients underwent hip revision using the ENDO spacer technique in the setting of a two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty. The technique involves the dual mobility liner and the downsized stainless cemented straight stem in combination with antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement. The primary outcome measure was the overall spacer complication rate, particularly spacer dislocation. Furthermore, functional outcome using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) before spacer implantation and prior re-implantation was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 69.8 years (range from 45 to 85; SD = 9.9 years). No microorganisms were preoperatively found in 23 (76.7%) cases. Successful re-implantation was performed in all patients after a mean spacer duration time of 53.6 days (range 14-288 days; SD = 48.2). Spacer-related complications occurred in only two patients (6.7%). The HHS significantly improved from 34.0 (range 3-62; SD = 15.1) to 48.1 (range 11-73; SD = 15.7) (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: The ENDO spacer surgical technique is a feasible option in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with a low dislocation rate. Furthermore, it allows early mobilization with the possibility of full-weight bearing.

Posterolateral overhang affects patient quality of life after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To investigate the appropriate mediolateral placement of symmetrical tibial components and the amount of overhang expected from the posterolateral of tibial components implanted to give ideal coverage and the subsequent incidence of residual knee pain and reduction in functional capacity. METHOD: A retrospective evaluation was made of 146 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. The posterolateral overhang, rotational alignment and coverage of the tibial component were measured on a post-operative CT scan and the effect of posterolateral overhang on clinical outcomes was analysed 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Complaints of local pain in the posterolateral corner were determined in 76 (52.1%) patients. At the Posterolateral corner, overhang was determined in 111 (76%) patients, in the cortical border in 11 (7.6%) patients and underhang in 24 (16.4%) patients. In 71 (48.6%) patients, pain was determined together with oversize and in the evaluation of the overhang of the tibial component in the posterolateral region and the rotation status, there was determined to be overhang in 75 (96.2%) patients where the tibial component was placed in ideal rotation, in 25 (100%) where placement was in external rotation and in 11 (25.6%) where placement was in internal rotation. The mean KSS, KSS-F and WOMAC-P scores were 83.9 ± 6.3, 83.3 ± 7.8 and 4.6 ± 2.9, respectively, in those with posterolateral overhang of the tibial component .The mean KSS, KSS-F and WOMAC-P scores were 86.6 ± 8.4, 89.5 ± 7.8 and 2.8 ± 2.1, respectively, in those with no overhang and the difference was determined to be statistically significant. The amount of overhang was determined as mean 3.6 ± 2.0 mm in those with posterolateral pain and 0.02 ± 3.4 mm in those without pain and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that overhang in the posterolateral region is surprisingly high and negatively affects the clinical results following TKA, thereby presenting a danger to the success of TKA. The risk of posterolateral oversizing can increase with placement of the tibial component in external rotation.

How Reliable Is the Alpha-defensin Immunoassay Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: A key issue in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the correct diagnosis. The main problem is lack of diagnostic tools able to diagnose a PJI with high accuracy. Alpha-defensin has been proposed as a possible solution, but in the current literature, there is a lack of independent validation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a prospective study to determine (1) what is the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and the negative predictive values of the alpha-defensin immunoassay test in diagnosing PJI; and (2) which clinical features may be responsible for false-positive and false-negative results? METHODS: Preoperative aspiration was performed in all patients presenting with a painful hip/knee arthroplasty, including both primary and revision implants. Metallosis, other inflammatory comorbidities, and previous/concomitant antibiotic therapy were not considered as exclusion criteria. An inadequate amount of synovial fluid for culture was an exclusion criterion. A total of 156 patients (65 knees, 91 hips) were included in this prospective study. At the time of revision, synovial fluid samples were taken to perform the alpha-defensin assay. During surgical débridement of tissue, samples for cultures and histologic evaluation were taken, and samples were cultured until positive or until negative at 14 days. A diagnosis of PJI was confirmed in 29 patients according to the International Consensus Group on PJI. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the alpha-defensin immunoassay was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%-99%), the specificity was 97% (95% CI, 92%-99%), the positive predictive value was 88% (95% CI, 81%-92%), and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI, 96%-99%). Among four false-positive patients, two had metallosis and one had polyethylene wear. The false-negative case presented with a draining sinus, and intraoperative cultures were also negative. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-defensin assay appears to be a reliable test, but followup evaluation is needed to estimate longer term performance of the test. The authors believe that alpha-defensin has demonstrated itself to be sufficiently robust that PJI diagnostic criteria now should include this test. Future studies are needed to compare the differences among the diagnostic capability of the available tests, in particular when metallosis is present, because metallosis may predispose the test to a false-positive result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study.

Severe metallosis and elevated chromium in serum following implantation of the joint unloading implant system.

In recent years, the minimally invasive joint-preserving implant system has been developed. The main goal of this device is to unload the medial knee compartment without affecting the lateral compartment. The current authors describe a severe metallosis and elevated chromium in serum following implantation of the joint unloading implant system of a 50-year-old male patient, presented to our hospital 3 years after implantation of a KineSpring System into his left knee due to unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis (OA) in an external hospital. Radiographs showed radiological signs for loosening of the screws in the tibia and a progressive OA on the medial and patellofemoral compartments. Revision surgery with removing of the unloading device was performed at our hospital. The intraoperative situs presented a severe metallosis around the device. Five days after revision surgery, the laboratory parameters revealed an elevated value for chromium in serum, while nickel and cobalt values in serum were normal. Reliable clinical data about the long-term results of the KineSpring System is desperately needed. Further studies are warranted to work out the effects of cobalt and chromium levels and further side effects following the implantation of the extra-articular absorber system.

Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Although two-stage exchange is the preferred management method of patients with chronic PJI in TKA in North America, one-stage exchange is an alternative treatment method, but long-term studies of this approach have not been conducted. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed our minimum 9-year results of 70 patients who underwent one-stage exchange arthroplasty with a rotating hinge design to determine: (1) What was the proportion of patients free of infection? (2) What was the patient rate of survival free of any reoperation? (3) What were the clinical outcomes as measured by Hospital for Special Surgery scores? (4) What proportion of patients developed radiographic evidence of loosening? METHODS: All one-stage revision TKAs for infection between January 1 and December 31, 2002, with a minimum 9-year followup (mean, 10 years; range, 9-11 years), in which patients had been seen within the last 1 year, were included in this retrospective review. During that period, 11 patients with infected TKAs were treated with other approaches (including two-stage approaches in eight); the general indication for one-stage revision was the diagnosis of PJI with a known causative organism. Exclusion criteria were culture-negative preoperative aspiration, known allergy to local antibiotics or bone cement, or cases in which radical débridement was impossible as a result of the involvement of important anatomical structures. Eighty-one patients with PJI were seen during this period; 70 underwent one-stage exchange using our strict protocol and were reimplanted with a rotating hinge TKA. Eleven patients (15.7%) were lost to followup. Hospital for Special Surgery scores were recorded and all radiographs were evaluated for prosthetic loosening. Failure was defined as revision surgery for infection or any other cause. RESULTS: Our 10-year infection-free survival was 93% (mean, 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-96%; p < 0.007); and the patient 10-year survival rate free of revision for other causes was 91% (mean, 5.2; 95% CI, 86%-95%; p < 0.002). Mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score at last followup was 69.6 (± 22.5 SD; range, 22-100) and the mean improvement in Hospital for Special Surgery knee score from preoperative to most recent followup was 35 (± 24.2 SD; range, 13-99). Evidence of radiographic loosening was seen in 11 patients at last followup, whereby in six patients, there was need for revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results showed an overall infection control rate of 93% and good clinical results using our one-stage approach, which combines aggressive débridement of the collateral ligaments and posterior capsule with a rotating hinge implant. These results are comparable with two-stage techniques at a followup of 10 years; further research into one-stage exchange techniques for PJI in TKA appears warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.