Clinical benefits and bioequivalence of vortioxetine oral drop solution versus oral tablets.

BACKGROUND: Vortioxetine is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is available as an immediate-release tablet and oral drop solution. The oral drop solution may offer clinical benefits versus a tablet, such as the reduced risk of nausea, personalised dosing and ease of administration. AIMS: To investigate the bioequivalence of vortioxetine 20 mg/mL oral drop solution versus a 20 mg immediate-release tablet. METHODS: Healthy adults were randomised 1:1 to receive vortioxetine 20 mg oral drop solution or immediate-release 20 mg tablet after fasting on days 1 and 29 in an open-label, single-centre, single-dose crossover study. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0-72h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were analysed. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CI for the oral drop solution-to-immediate-release tablet ratio for AUC0-72h and Cmax were contained within a range of 0.80-1.25. RESULTS: Vortioxetine oral drop solution was bioequivalent to the tablet (n = 26; estimated AUC0-72h ratio 1.06 (90% CI: 1.03-1.10); Cmax ratio 1.01 (90% CI: 0.97-1.05)). A similar proportion of participants reported adverse events in each study arm but more headache events (7 vs 1) were reported with the oral drop solution versus tablet. The most common adverse event was nausea (16-23% of participants; all mild intensity). CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine oral drop solution is bioequivalent to immediate-release tablets. Oral drop solution provides an alternative to tablets and facilitates clinical benefit through individualised treatment, including gradual dose up-titration, for patients with MDD.

Personalized Antihypertensive Treatment Optimization With Smartphone-Enabled Remote Precision Dosing of Amlodipine During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PERSONAL-CovidBP Trial).

BACKGROUND: The objective of the PERSONAL-CovidBP (Personalised Electronic Record Supported Optimisation When Alone for Patients With Hypertension: Pilot Study for Remote Medical Management of Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic) trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of smartphone-enabled remote precision dosing of amlodipine to control blood pressure (BP) in participants with primary hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an open-label, remote, dose titration trial using daily home self-monitoring of BP, drug dose, and side effects with linked smartphone app and telemonitoring. Participants aged ≥18 years with uncontrolled hypertension (5-7 day baseline mean ≥135 mm Hg systolic BP or ≥85 mm Hg diastolic BP) received personalized amlodipine dose titration using novel (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 mg) and standard (5 and 10 mg) doses daily over 14 weeks. The primary outcome of the trial was mean change in systolic BP from baseline to end of treatment. A total of 205 participants were enrolled and mean BP fell from 142/87 (systolic BP/diastolic BP) to 131/81 mm Hg (a reduction of 11 (95% CI, 10-12)/7 (95% CI, 6-7) mm Hg, P<0.001). The majority of participants achieved BP control on novel doses (84%); of those participants, 35% were controlled by 1 mg daily. The majority (88%) controlled on novel doses had no peripheral edema. Adherence to BP recording and reported adherence to medication was 84% and 94%, respectively. Patient retention was 96% (196/205). Treatment was well tolerated with no withdrawals from adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized dose titration with amlodipine was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in treating primary hypertension. The majority of participants achieved BP control on novel doses, and with personalization of dose there were no trial discontinuations due to drug intolerance. App-assisted remote clinician dose titration may better balance BP control and adverse effects and help optimize long-term care. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04559074.

CURATE.AI-assisted dose titration for anti-hypertensive personalized therapy: study protocol for a multi-arm, randomized, pilot feasibility trial using CURATE.AI (CURATE.AI ADAPT trial).

Aims: Artificial intelligence-driven small data platforms such as CURATE.AI hold potential for personalized hypertension care by assisting physicians in identifying personalized anti-hypertensive doses for titration. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the efficacy of CURATE.AI-assisted dose titration intervention. We will also collect preliminary efficacy and safety data and explore stakeholder feedback in the early design process. Methods and results: In this open-label, randomized, pilot feasibility trial, we aim to recruit 45 participants with primary hypertension. Participants will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into control (no intervention), home blood pressure monitoring (active control; HBPM), or CURATE.AI arms (intervention; HBPM and CURATE.AI-assisted dose titration). The home treatments include 1 month of two-drug anti-hypertensive regimens. Primary endpoints assess the logistical (e.g. dose adherence) and scientific (e.g. percentage of participants for which CURATE.AI profiles can be generated) feasibility, and define the progression criteria for the RCT in a 'traffic light system'. Secondary endpoints assess preliminary efficacy [e.g. mean change in office blood pressures (BPs)] and safety (e.g. hospitalization events) associated with each treatment protocol. Participants with both baseline and post-treatment BP measurements will form the intent-to-treat analysis. Following their involvement with the CURATE.AI intervention, feedback from CURATE.AI participants and healthcare providers will be collected via exit survey and interviews. Conclusion: Findings from this study will inform about potential refinements of the current treatment protocols before proceeding with a larger RCT, or potential expansion to collect additional information. Positive results may suggest the potential efficacy of CURATE.AI to improve BP control. Trial registration number: NCT05376683.

Oral octreotide capsules for acromegaly treatment: application of clinical trial insights to real-world use.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder usually caused by a benign growth hormone‒secreting pituitary adenoma. Surgical adenoma resection is typically the first line of treatment, and medical therapy is used for patients with persistent disease following surgery, for adenoma recurrence, or for patients ineligible for, or declining, surgery. Approved somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) have been limited to injectable options, until recently. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are the first approved oral SRL for patients with acromegaly. AREAS COVERED: We review published reports and provide case study examples demonstrating practical considerations on the use of OOC. Using two hypothetical case scenarios, we discuss current treatment patterns, breakthrough symptoms and quality of life (QoL), efficacy of SRLs, OOC dose titration, evaluation of OOC treatment response, and incidence and management of adverse events. EXPERT OPINION: OOC are an option for patients with acromegaly including those who experience breakthrough symptoms, who have preference for oral therapies, or other reasons for declining injectable SRLs. OOC have been associated with improved patient-reported QoL measures compared with those reported for lanreotide and octreotide. Continued real-world experience will determine whether OOC, alone or in combination with other therapies, provides further advantages over current injectable acromegaly treatments.

Determination of the median lethal dose of zinc gluconate in mice and safety evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Zinc Gluconate (ZG) is a safe and effective supplement for zinc. However, there is limited research on the optimal dosage for intravenous injection and the safety evaluation of animal models for ZG. This study aims to determine the safe dose range of ZG for intravenous injection in C57BL/6J mice. METHODS: A Dose titration experiment was conducted to determine the LD50 and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of ZG in mice. Based on the LD50, four sub-lethal doses (SLD) of ZG were evaluated. Following three injections of each SLD and monitoring for seven days, serum zinc levels were measured, and pathological changes in the liver, kidney, and spleen tissues of mice were determined by histological staining. RESULTS: The dose titration experiment determined the LD50 of ZG in mice to be 39.6 mg/kg, with a 95%CI of 31.8-49.3 mg/kg. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall serum zinc levels (H = 36.912, P < 0.001) following SLD administration. Pairwise comparisons showed that the serum zinc levels of the 1/2 LD50 and 3/4 LD50 groups were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.001); the serum zinc level of the 3/4 LD50 group was significantly higher than those of the 1/8 LD50 and 1/4 LD50 groups (P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the different SLDs of ZG and the serum zinc levels in mice (rs = 0.973, P < 0.001). H&E staining showed no significant histological abnormalities or lesions in the liver, kidney, and spleen tissues of mice in all experimental groups. CONCLUSION: The appropriate dose range of ZG for intravenous injection in C57BL/6J mice was clarified, providing a reference for future experimental research.

Less is more: Self-amplifying mRNA becomes self-killing upon dose escalation in immune-competent retinal cells.

In the last few years, mRNA therapeutics experienced a new wave of interest as therapy for retinal diseases. Nevertheless, despite the widespread use of mRNA vaccines in the COVID-19 pandemic, mRNA delivery to the eye is still in its infancy. Recently, our research group has demonstrated that after subretinal and intravitreal delivery of modified mRNA, the number of transfected retinal cells and protein expression per cell remains limited. In this study, we aimed to tackle this limitation by using self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA), which in theory will increase the duration and level of protein expression when only a few mRNA molecules reach their target cells. A one-on-one comparison between modified mRNA and saRNA in two immune-competent human retinal cell types, including Müller cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells, and in immune-deficient BHK-21 cells revealed that saRNA delivery induced an innate immune response blocking its own translation above a certain dose threshold. Removal of double-stranded (ds)RNA byproducts by cellulose-based purification and addition of the innate immune inhibitor B18R remarkably improved translation from saRNA through a reduction in innate immune response. Taken together, when saRNA is applied for retinal disease, the dose should be controlled and measures should be taken to limit immunogenicity.