Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane Versus In-Plane Radial Artery Cannulation in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the rate of first-pass radial arterial cannulation using out-of-plane ultrasound guidance with in-plane imaging. The secondary endpoints were a comparison of the number of times the cannula was redirected, the number of attempts, the number of skin punctures, the incidence of hematoma, the time to completion of the cannulation procedure, and the number of failed attempts between the 2 ultrasound imaging techniques. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, observational study. SETTING: A tertiary cardiac care center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Radial artery cannulation with ultrasound guidance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-four adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to the out-of-plane ultrasound group (group I, n = 42) or the in-plane ultrasound group (group II, n = 42) for left radial artery cannulation. A linear ultrasound probe was used to identify the radial artery. In each approach, the number of times first-pass success was achieved, the number of times the cannula was redirected, the number of skin punctures, the incidence of hematomas, and the number of failed attempts were recorded. The first-pass success rate was greater in the in-plane ultrasound group and was statistically significant (p = 0.007). In the out-of-plane ultrasound group, a larger number of patients needed redirection of the cannula (p = 0.002). The number of patients in whom the skin needed to be punctured more than once was greater in the out-of-plane ultrasound group compared with the in-plane ultrasound group (p = 0.002). The incidence of hematoma formation and time to completion of the technique were similar in both groups (p = 0.241 and p = 0.792, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In-plane ultrasound guidance appeared to be superior for achieving a higher first-pass success rate more often with minimal redirections and skin punctures compared with out-of-plane ultrasound guidance.

A modified technique for carotid cannulation via the transfemoral approach, during angioplasty and stent placement.

We report a modified technique for advancing a catheter or sheath into the right common carotid artery when the aortic arch anatomy is unfavorable.A standard 0.035-inch guidewire is passed into the right subclavian artery, and a diagnostic catheter is threaded over it, deep into the right axillary and brachial artery. This wire is exchanged for a stiffer wire (for example, a super-stiff Amplatz), and the catheter is removed. This stiff wire acts as an anchor and provides enough support for a sheath or a guide catheter to be easily advanced into the right brachiocephalic artery, up to its bifurcation into the subclavian and common carotid arteries. Another wire is then buddy-wired through the guide or sheath into the common carotid artery and is placed in a branch of the external carotid artery. The stiff wire is now slowly withdrawn from the subclavian artery, and as soon as its tip exits the subclavian ostium, the guide or sheath is advanced into the common carotid artery.This simple modification can improve the success rate of carotid cannulation via the femoral approach without increasing procedural risks.

Safety and feasibility of transulnar cardiac catheterization.

Recently, ulnar artery cannulation has been described as an alternative to the transfemoral and radial approaches to vascular access for cardiac catheterization. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the ulnar approach.From September 2004 through September 2006, 28 patients in a cohort study underwent cardiac catheterization by the transulnar approach. Patients were eligible if they had scheduled an elective cardiac catheterization or angioplasty procedure and displayed a palpable ulnar pulse and a positive reverse Allen's test (< 10 sec). Further, we enrolled only patients who had stable angina. After cannulation, a 5F or 6F introducer was placed inside the vessel, and cardiac catheterization or angioplasty was performed. The patients underwent clinical examination when discharged from the hospital and again at the 1-week follow up.Mean age, weight, and height of the patients were 60 +/- 14 years, 78 +/- 14 kg, and 148 +/- 55 cm, respectively, and 69% were men. Successful puncture was achieved in 93% (26/28), and in all 26 of these patients the procedure could be completed by the ulnar approach. The femoral approach was used for the remaining 2 patients. No cases of arterial spasm or loss of pulse were observed. Two patients had minor hematoma at the entry site. There were no cases of pseudoaneurysm, bleeding episodes requiring transfusion, or vascular perforation.We conclude that the transulnar approach is a safe and feasible alternative for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention.

Re-entry devices in the treatment of peripheral chronic occlusions.

Chronic occlusions are present in up to 40% of patients who undergo treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The primary difficulty encountered during the treatment of chronic occlusions is inability to re-enter the true lumen after subintimal crossing of the occlusion. Two devices have been designed to mitigate this limitation via controlled re-entry. Herein, we report our experience with the Outback LTD catheter and the Pioneer Plus Catheter PPlus 120 in re-entering the true arterial lumen during percutaneous intentional extraluminal revascularization for peripheral chronic occlusions involving the superficial femoral artery. In reviewing our peripheral interventions performed from February 2006 through February 2009, we evaluated angiograms, patients' characteristics, presentations, types of lesions, procedural successes, complications, and symptom-free intervals. The total study population consisted of 23 patients. The Outback catheter was used in 15 patients and the Pioneer catheter in 8 patients.The procedure was successful in all 8 Pioneer cases (100%) and in 13 of the 15 Outback cases (87%). All 8 (100%) of the patients in the Pioneer group and 12 of the 14 patients in the Outback group (86%) remained asymptomatic at an average of 12 months. Overall, there were no procedural complications, amputations, or deaths. This single-center experience demonstrates that the Outback and Pioneer re-entry catheters are safe and effective in managing peripheral chronic occlusions, with an average symptom-free interval of 12 months. This management strategy proves to be reasonable when standard techniques fail to achieve true lumen re-entry.