Exposure-response analyses of blood pressure and heart rate changes for methylphenidate in healthy adults.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the exposure-response (E-R) relationships of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) changes in healthy adults taking methylphenidate (MPH). Intensive time profiles of BP and HR from healthy adults in placebo and MPH treatment arms of seven clinical trials from the FDA internal database were utilized for this analysis. The analysis model contains a circadian component for placebo effect and an E-R component to describe drug effect. Internal validation was performed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual predictive check. A meta-database based on a systemic literature search was constructed and used for external validation of the developed models. We found that circadian models could quantify the time profiles of BP/HR in placebo arms. Linear models could describe the correlations between MPH concentrations, and BP/HR changes. The BP and HR changes were highly dependent on the shapes of MPH pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles without an apparent time delay. MPH has the greatest effect on HR, followed by systolic BP, and diastolic BP. Internal validation revealed that the developed models could adequately describe the circadian rhythms of HR and BP in placebo arms and the E-R relationships of MPH. External validation showed the models had good predictive capability of the literature data. In conclusion, the developed models adequately characterized the circadian rhythm and the MPH induced effects on BP and HR. The changes in BP and HR were highly correlated with MPH blood levels with no apparent delay. The time courses of BP and HR are similar to the MPH PK profiles. As a result, the immediate-release formulation may yield larger maximum BP and HR effect than the extended-release formulation under similar dose.

An integrated approach for establishing dosing recommendations: paliperidone for the treatment of adolescent schizophrenia.

The Food and Drug Administration recently approved Invega for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents 12 to 17 years. If dosing recommendations for this population would have been based only on the results of the single efficacy trial included in this program, paliperidone dosing in adolescents might have been limited to 3 mg/d in adolescents less than 51 kg and to 6 mg/d in adolescents greater than or equal to 51 kg. This article provides an illustration of a more integrated approach to arrive at dosing recommendation that included practical considerations, modeling and simulation of data from the clinical trial, and the totality of evidence for both paliperidone and the parent drug, risperidone. On the basis of this integrated approach, the agency approved a starting dose of 3 mg/d in both adolescent weight groups and subsequent dosing in a range of 3 to 6 mg/d for adolescents less than 51 kg and 3 to 12 mg/d for adolescents greater than 51 kg, although the 3-mg dose was not evaluated in the greater than or equal to 51-kg group.

Shortened Positive and Negative Symptom Scale as an Alternate Clinical Endpoint for Acute Schizophrenia Trials: Analysis from the US Food & Drug Administration.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the individual Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) items, and to assess the feasibility of using a shortened version of the PANSS as an alternative regulatory endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of drugs to treat schizophrenia. Design: Data from 32 randomized, placebo-controlled, multiregional trials from eight atypical antipsychotic programs (N=14,219) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration were used in the analyses. Item response theory analysis on baseline PANSS item scores was used to identify the best performing items of the PANSS to derive the shortened, or modified, PANSS (mPANSS). Concordance rates of mPANSS total with the PANSS total trial results at week 6 were examined, and implications of using mPANSS on trial sample size evaluated. Results: Five of the positive items, six of the negative items, and eight of the general items were assessed as sensitive to describe the underlying symptom severity and comprise mPANSS. The overall concordance rate between mPANSS and total PANSS results at week 6 was 97.6%. Using mPANSS resulted in a 32% reduction in samples size relative to using total PANSS. Conclusions: Based on this research, mPANSS may be considered a potential alternative clinical endpoint for acute schizophrenia trials. However, it will need psychometric validation before it can be fully implemented in clinical trials in place of total PANSS. If such implementation occurs, the development of new drugs for schizophrenia, a public health imperative, may be considerably improved.

The Trend of Increasing Placebo Response and Decreasing Treatment Effect in Schizophrenia Trials Continues: An Update From the US Food and Drug Administration.

OBJECTIVE: Concerns of increasing placebo response and declining treatment effect in acute schizophrenia trials have been reported for new drug applications (NDAs) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during an 18-year period from 1991 through January 2009 (ie, the pre-2009 period). Current exploratory analyses provide an update in the trends observed in placebo response, treatment effect, and dropout rates for NDAs submitted from February 2009 to 2015 (ie, the post-2009 period). DATA SOURCES: Clinical trial data from all acute schizophrenia trials that were submitted as part of NDAs to the US FDA during a 24-year period from 1991 to 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Aggregate trial-level efficacy data from multicenter, multiregional, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4- to 8-week, fixed- and flexible-dose trials in adult schizophrenia patients were compiled. There were 12 NDAs pre-2009 (32 trials, N = 11,567) and 3 NDAs post-2009 (14 trials, N = 6,434). DATA EXTRACTION: Baseline demographic and disease variables and scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were summarized and compared for the two time periods (pre-2009 and post-2009). The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to endpoint in total PANSS score obtained by last-observation-carried-forward analysis. Regional differences in placebo response and treatment effect were explored for the two time periods based on baseline patient characteristics, sample size, and dropout rates. RESULTS: Trials were predominantly multiregional (10/14; 71%) during the post-2009 period compared to the pre-2009 period (11/32; 34%). The overall trial success rates were 57% (8/14) and 78% (25/32) during the post-2009 and pre-2009 periods, respectively. Comparing the pre-2009 and post-2009 periods, the mean placebo response (change from baseline in PANSS score) increased from -6.4 to -10.5 and the mean treatment effect (drug response - placebo response) declined from -8.6 to -5.8 , with substantial differences observed especially in North American trials. In North American trials, placebo response increased from -4.3 (pre-2009) to -8.5 (post-2009), and treatment effect decreased from -9.0 (pre-2009) to -3.4 (post-2009). The difference in placebo response (pre- and post-2009: -10.0 and -11.3 ) and treatment effect (pre and post-2009: -8.1 and -6.4 ) in multiregional trials for the two time periods remained minimal. Baseline disease severity remained similar in the pre- and post-2009 time periods, with PANSS scores ranging between 85 and 100. Trials with higher mean baseline PANSS scores tended to show higher treatment effect irrespective of the time period and region. Post-2009, dropout rates were higher (55%) in North American trials compared with 33% in multiregional trials, similar to the pre-2009 trend. CONCLUSIONS: The continuing trend of increasing placebo responses and decreasing treatment effects in schizophrenia trials over the 24-year period does remain of great concern, especially with respect to North American trials. However, given the current global nature of drug development, close attention to trial conduct and reexamination of design elements for future trials may be warranted.

Association of End Point Definition and Randomized Clinical Trial Duration in Clinical Trials of Schizophrenia Medications.

Importance: Facilitating the development of safe and effective medications for schizophrenia is a public health imperative. Objectives: To evaluate the association of shortening randomized clinical trial (RCT) duration with the modification of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for the design of RCTs of medications for schizophrenia and to offer perspective on an alternative regulatory pathway to the historically accepted trial duration and response assessment. Data Sources: A database was created consisting of clinical trial data from 32 placebo-controlled RCTs of 8 atypical antipsychotic drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2015. The database included information on total and individual PANSS item ratings, demographic characteristics, disposition, and adverse events (AEs). Study Selection: All clinical trials submitted to 8 new drug applications of atypical antipsychotic drugs were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Quality control checks were performed to ensure that the collected data were consistent with the reported results of each trial. Data were collected from March 15, 2015, to September 30, 2015. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2015, to June 20, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The following analyses were performed: (1) longitudinal assessment of mean change from baseline in total PANSS score, (2) correlation analyses between change from baseline in total PANSS score at week 6 and earlier time points, (3) concordance analyses of outcomes across trials between week 6 and earlier time points using total PANSS and modified PANSS, and (4) analyses of time course of treatment-emergent AEs. Results: The final database contained data from 14 219 participants enrolled in 32 drug trials; 9805 of 14 219 participants (69.0%) were male and were either white (7183 [50.5%]) or black (4346 [30.6%]) individuals. The mean (SD) age during treatment was 38.9 (10.9) years, and the mean (SD) age at schizophrenia diagnosis was 25 (8.5) years. Statistically significant separation between treatment response and placebo response was observed after 1 week of treatment. The overall concordance rate across treatment groups steadily increased from week 1 to week 4 (68.0% for week 1, 74.0% for week 2, 83.0% for week 3, and 93.0% for week 4). Trends in AE occurrence were evident by week 1 and percentage of AEs were similar across weeks 3, 4, and 6. The overall concordance rate between change from baseline in the modified PANSS score and change from baseline in the total PANSS score was 93.0% (80 of 86 treatment groups) at week 4 and 97.7% (84 of 86 treatment groups) at week 6. Shortening the trial duration to 4 weeks increased the required sample size to 502 participants. Using the modified PANSS as the end point, the sample size for a 4-week trial was 402 participants and 296 participants for a 6-week trial. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this analysis suggest that there is the potential to streamline the design of schizophrenia drug clinical trials. Trial sponsors may consider incorporating these strategies and are encouraged to consult with the FDA early in the drug development process.

Assessment of Similarity in Antipsychotic Exposure-Response Relationships in Clinical Trials Between Adults and Adolescents With Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia.

Despite agreement that early-onset schizophrenia is continuous with the adult-onset form, quantitative relationships between antipsychotic exposure and clinical response are relatively unexplored in adolescents, compared to adults. Clinical efficacy data from second-generation antipsychotic development programs (N = 5951 adults and N = 1035 adolescents ranging from 12 to 17 years old) were collected from available new drug applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration from 1993 to 2017. The developed disease-drug trial models adequately predicted the longitudinal trend in total positive and negative syndrome scale scores in both adults and adolescents using a Weibull placebo response, time-delayed drug effect, and a Weibull structural dropout model. Maximum drug effect was similar between the two populations and was estimated to be between a range of 5% to 11% in adults and 5% to 7% in adolescents. Half maximal effective concentration parameter estimates also indicated similar exposure-response relationships in adults and adolescents across all 4 antipsychotics. Simulated adolescent data using final model parameter estimates from the adult model were in agreement with adolescent observations. This analysis confirms similarity in exposure-response for efficacy and could expedite the development of second-generation antipsychotics for adolescents.

A Quantitative Justification of Similarity in Placebo Response Between Adults and Adolescents With Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia in Clinical Trials.

Early-onset schizophrenia, or "adolescent schizophrenia," has a global incidence ranging up to 4% of all schizophrenia cases. Clinical data from antipsychotic programs were collected from new drug applications submitted to the US Food and Drug administration from 1993 to 2015. A placebo response-dropout model was developed to describe the time course of total positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) scores in adults and adolescents. The final model in both populations suggested that patients with higher baseline scores exhibited a greater absolute reduction from baseline. Higher baseline total PANSS, enrollment in US trials, and increases or small improvements in total PANSS were found to be predictors of dropout in both populations. Simulated adolescent data using the final adult placebo response model resembled the observed adolescent data. By confirming similar changes in disease symptomology during an acute exacerbation, efficient regulatory pathways for adolescents can be facilitated by using the extrapolation paradigm.

The US Food and Drug Administration's Perspective on the New Antipsychotic Pimavanserin.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) review of the safety and effectiveness for pimavanserin, an atypical antipsychotic, for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis. We describe the regulatory and clinical issues important to the FDA's approval of this New Drug Application, with special focus on the risk-benefit balance. We also describe a new labeling feature that presents additional efficacy data to clinicians. DATA SOURCES: Data sets for all relevant clinical trials of pimavanserin and the Applicant's and FDA's analyses of these data were considered in this review. Data were available from 616 patients with Parkinson's disease with hallucinations and delusions who received at least 1 dose of pimavanserin, with a total exposure of 825 patient-years in the Parkinson's disease psychosis population. RESULTS: Pimavanserin 34 mg/d was effective in treating hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease. In the Applicant's single pivotal trial, 80.5% of pimavanserin patients experienced at least some improvement in symptoms compared to 58.1% of patients taking placebo. Pimavanserin did not worsen motor function, an adverse effect commonly observed with other antipsychotics, probably because of a lack of consequential dopamine binding. CONCLUSIONS: Pimavanserin is the only FDA-approved treatment for the hallucinations and delusions seen in patients with psychosis of Parkinson's disease. Although pimavanserin appears to have a pharmacologic mechanism that is different from other atypical antipsychotics, concern remained that the increased risk of death seen with antipsychotic use in elderly demented patients, and described in all approved antipsychotic labels, would also occur with pimavanserin. Pimavanserin bears the same boxed warning about the risk of death associated with antipsychotic use in elderly patients with dementia.

Regulatory and scientific issues in studies to evaluate sexual dysfunction in antidepressant drug trials.

OBJECTIVE: Sexual dysfunction is an important side effect of serotonergic antidepressants, as it often leads to treatment nonadherence. However, sexual dysfunction is often underestimated in clinical trials submitted in support of drug approval. This is because such assessments are based mainly on unsolicited reporting. As a result, the characterization of sexual adverse events has become an important component of many of the development programs for new antidepressants. The purpose of this article is to discuss US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on possible approaches to characterizing the effects of drugs on sexual function in depression drug trials. PARTICIPANTS: FDA's Division of Psychiatry Products, together with the Division of Biometrics I, in particular the authors of this article. EVIDENCE: The above-referenced FDA divisions conducted a regulatory science forum on measuring sexual dysfunction in depression trials. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Considering the evidence presented and discussed at the forum, we developed our preliminary regulatory views on the scientific issues with regard to study design, study population, use of available scales, testing strategy, and statistical analysis plans. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants is an important entity that should be adequately assessed during clinical trials with the use of available instruments and described in product labels. It is important to appreciate the need for a positive control to establish assay sensitivity for any trial evaluating the impact of antidepressant medications on sexual function. Methodological improvement and additional data as well as experience with these approaches will be needed prior to further consideration of a formal regulatory guidance document by the FDA.

The US Food and Drug Administration's perspective on the new antidepressant vortioxetine.

OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) review of the New Drug Application for vortioxetine, especially the clinical efficacy and safety data. It emphasizes the issues that were important to the FDA's approval decision, particularly the difference in the effective dose in domestic and foreign studies, and notes several new labeling features, specifically, description of time course of treatment response and detailed sexual dysfunction evaluation. DATA SOURCES: The data sources were the original raw data sets for all clinical trials included in the development program for vortioxetine, as well as the sponsor's original analyses of these data. Data were available from 51 human trials involving vortioxetine, and included a total of 7,666 healthy volunteers and patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) or generalized anxiety disorder who were exposed to at least 1 dose of vortioxetine for a total of 2,743 patient-years. RESULTS: Vortioxetine was effective in treating MDD in the United States at a dose of 20 mg/d. The recommended starting dose is 10 mg once daily without regard to food, with increase to 20 mg/d if the 10 mg/d dose is tolerated. For patients who do not tolerate 20 mg/d, 10 mg/d can be used and 5-mg/d dose can be considered. Vortioxetine can be discontinued abruptly, but it is recommended that doses of 15 mg/d or 20 mg/d be reduced to 10 mg/d for 1 week prior to full discontinuation to avoid potential withdrawal symptoms. Although the non-US maintenance study showed that maintenance doses of 5 to 10 mg/d were effective, a clinical judgment needs to be made to decide the maintenance dose in the United States. The applicant has agreed to conduct a US maintenance dose-response study covering the US-approved dose range. Vortioxetine's adverse event profile is similar to that of other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Nausea is the most common adverse event and is dose dependent. No dose adjustment is needed based on age, gender, or the presence of renal or mild to moderate hepatic impairment. The maximum recommended dose is 10 mg/d in known cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine is a new treatment for MDD, and its adverse event profile is similar to that of other SSRIs.

Review of maintenance trials for major depressive disorder: a 25-year perspective from the US Food and Drug Administration.

OBJECTIVE: The maintenance efficacy of antidepressants is usually assessed in postmarketing studies with a randomized withdrawal design. This report explores differences in relapse rates, trial characteristics, and success rates in maintenance efficacy studies submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over a 25-year period. DATA SOURCES: Clinical data from all maintenance trials with antidepressants submitted to FDA between 1987 and 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Efficacy data were compiled from 15 maintenance clinical trials in adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder according to DSM-III or DSM-IV criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Trial characteristics, relapse rates, and time to relapse in each study were examined. RESULTS: Relapse rates were significantly lower (P < .05) in the drug arm than in the placebo arm in every study, with a mean relapse rate difference of 18% and an average percent reduction in relapse rate of 52% compared to placebo. Only 6% of the relapse events occurred in the first 2 weeks of the double-blind phase. The separation between treatment arms continued to increase throughout the double-blind phase only in the trial with longest response stabilization period. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant maintenance trials have a high rate of success, indicating a benefit of continuing drug treatment after initial response to an antidepressant. This benefit appears to result mainly from a decreased rate of recurrent depression rather than from an effect of drug withdrawal in the placebo groups.

CYP2D6 genotype information to guide pimozide treatment in adult and pediatric patients: basis for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's new dosing recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: The occurrence of pimozide-induced arrhythmias is concentration dependent. Hence, it is important for prescribers to consider causes of increased pimozide exposure. This article summarizes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) review of drug interaction and pharmacogenomic studies and discusses pharmacokinetic simulations we performed to develop new cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype-guided dosing recommendations for pimozide. METHOD: Pharmacokinetic parameters by CYP2D6 genotype were derived from a published single-dose pharmacogenomic study of pimozide. We simulated what pimozide exposures would result from a multiple-dose scenario in different CYP2D6 genotype groups: extensive, intermediate, and poor metabolizers. The maximum dose for poor metabolizers was defined as the dose that would not exceed pimozide concentrations following 10 mg daily in extensive metabolizers and intermediate metabolizers (the current maximum dose in an unselected population). RESULTS: Dose-ranging analyses revealed that 4 mg daily in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers was the maximum dose that would not result in plasma concentrations in excess of those observed in extensive metabolizer and intermediate metabolizer patients receiving 10 mg daily. CYP2D6 genotyping is now consequently recommended in the pimozide product label before exceeding 4 mg of pimozide daily in adults or 0.05 mg/kg/d in children. Previously, dose adjustment was recommended every 3 days to achieve the desired clinical response for all patients. The label was modified to subsequently reflect that pimozide doses should not be increased earlier than 14 days in patients who are known CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Given the risk of increased pimozide concentrations and longer time to steady state in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, the FDA has revised the pimozide label to provide clinicians with clearer dosing, titration, and genotype testing recommendations. The new information is intended to enhance therapeutic individualization of pimozide in pediatric and adult patients.

Vilazodone: clinical basis for the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of a new antidepressant.

OBJECTIVE: Vilazodone was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The purpose of this review is to summarize the FDA's approach to its review of the clinical pharmacology and the clinical efficacy and safety data for this new drug application, important issues in its decision-making, and its conclusions. DATA SOURCES: The data sources for this review were the original raw data sets for all clinical trials included in the development program for vilazodone, as well as the sponsor's original analyses of these data. STUDY SELECTION: Data were available from 24 human trials involving vilazodone, and included a total of 2,898 human subjects exposed to 1 or more doses of this drug. DATA EXTRACTION: The FDA had access to original raw data sets for these trials. RESULTS: Vilazodone is effective in treating MDD at a dose of 40 mg/d, but it needs to be incrementally adjusted to this dose to minimize gastrointestinal symptoms. It needs to be taken with food to ensure adequate plasma concentrations. Vilazodone's profile of adverse events is similar to that seen with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. No dose adjustment is needed based on age, gender, or renal or hepatic impairment. It is recommended that the vilazodone dose be reduced to 20 mg when it is taken with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors, eg, ketoconazole. Vilazodone is not expected to have important effects on the clearance of other drugs that are cytochrome P450 substrates. CONCLUSIONS: Vilazodone is a new treatment for MDD, but it is unknown whether it has any advantages compared to other drugs in the antidepressant class.