Primary transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma in 391 cases: importance of risk factors in tumor control.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome of primary transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for choroidal melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records. PARTICIPANTS: We included 391 patients with choroidal melanoma treated between 1995 and 2012 at the Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia. METHODS: We delivered TTT with an infrared diode laser. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local tumor recurrence, Snellen visual acuity after TTT, and distant metastasis. RESULTS: Of 391 patients, 311 (80%) were treated from 1995 to 2000 and 80 (20%) from 2001 to 2012. Tumors in the 2001 to 2012 group were ultrasonographically thinner (2.2 vs. 2.7 mm), more distant from the optic disc (3.2 vs. 2.5 mm) and foveola (4.0 vs. 2.0 mm), were less often located in the macular area (14% vs. 40%), and had lower rates of acoustic hollowness on B-scan ultrasonography (63% vs. 84%), subretinal fluid (58% vs. 90%), and orange pigment (50% vs. 70%). Kaplan-Meier estimates for tumor recurrence in the 1995 to 2000 group were 29% at 5 years and 42% at 10 years, whereas estimates for tumor recurrence in the 2001-2012 group were 11% at 5 years and 15% at 10 years. Of 108 recurrent tumors 20 were controlled with additional TTT and 62 required plaque radiation (n=60) or proton beam radiation (n=2), with enucleation necessary in 26 patients. Tumor recurrence correlated with the number of high-risk tumor features: 10-year recurrence was 18% in those with 1 or 2 risk factors, 35% in those with 3 to 5 factors, and 55% in those with 6 or 7 factors. On multivariate analysis, features predictive of tumor recurrence were presence of symptoms (P<0.001), shorter distance between the tumor and the optic disc (P=0.026), subretinal fluid (P=0.035), thickness of residual tumor scar (P<0.001), and elevation of residual tumor scar (P<0.001). The only factor predictive of extraocular tumor extension was intraocular tumor recurrence after TTT treated with additional TTT (P=0.007). Presence of orange pigment before TTT (P=0.019), tumor recurrence (P=0.002), and extraocular tumor extension (P=0.017) were predictive of distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study shows a direct correlation between a larger number of high-risk tumor features and higher rates of tumor recurrence after primary TTT of (small) choroidal melanoma. We advise that, when possible, small choroidal melanomas with multiple risk factors be treated with methods other than TTT.

Pleiotropy of a Stickler syndrome genotype.

PURPOSE: To report a case of pleiotropy in the COL2A1 gene typically associated with Stickler Syndrome Type 1. OBSERVATIONS: A patient with a confirmed mutation of the COL2A1 gene presented with an isolated retinitis pigmentosa phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The mutated COL2A1 gene in Stickler Syndrome Type 1 represents a site of pleiotropy, highlighting a change in phenotype across the same genotype potentially due to tissue alternative splicing.

Accuracy of intravitreal injection volume for aflibercept pre-filled syringe and BD Luer-Lok one-milliliter syringe.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy of intravitreal injection volume of the pre-filled syringe (PFS) in which aflibercept is packaged compared to the BD Luer-Lok 1-mL syringe. METHODS: Ophthalmologists injected their typical intravitreal volume for aflibercept using either the PFS or BD Luer-Lok 1-mL syringe for 5 times each. The injected fluid was weighed using a micro-scale and converted to volume. The volume of fluid injected was also evaluated when the 0.05 mL line on the PFS was lined up to the tip or base of the dome-shaped plunger. RESULTS: Injection volume was measured for 12 physicians. The average injected fluid volume was 74.22 ± 15.87 µL for PFS and 53.42 ± 4.61 µL for the BD Luer-Lok 1-mL syringe (p < 0.0001). The average deviation in volume injected for the PFS was higher compared to the BD Luer-Lok 1-mL syringe (11.36 µL vs. 3.35 µL, p < 0.0001). When the PFS was lined up with the tip of the dome-shaped plunger at the 0.05-mL line, the average injected volume was 71.03% higher. CONCLUSIONS: The intravitreal injection volume and variability using the new PFS were significantly higher than the volume injected using the BD Luer-Lok 1-mL syringe previously used, potentially leading to higher rates of visually significant elevation of intraocular pressures.

Randomized, Comparative Study of Full- and Half-Dose Fluorescein Angiography.

Purpose: This study determines whether fluorescein angiography (FA) with a 250-mg dose of fluorescein (half dose) is equal in quality to the standard 500-mg dose of fluorescein (full dose) when using digital ultra-widefield (UWF) technology. Methods: In a randomized, prospective study using a UWF imaging system, FAs performed with half dose were compared with angiograms performed with full dose. Imaging studies were reviewed by 4 reviewers based on 6 characteristics: dye transit, macrovasculature, macula detail, microvasculature, leakage, and overall quality. The scores for macrovasculature, macula detail, microvasculature, and overall quality were converted to a fuzzy rating score to confirm results. Results: Seventy-nine FAs from 67 patients were reviewed for this study, including 12 patients who had both half-dose and full-dose FAs. Of all the factors studied, only microvasculature received a significantly different score between full dose and half dose that was confirmed by the fuzzy rating scale (3.79 vs 3.53; P = .04). Among those eyes that received both full and half dose, there was no significant difference in any of the 6 factors. Conclusions: In a UWF imaging system, aside from looking at fine microvascular abnormalities, the 250-mg dose of fluorescein provided similar results to a 500-mg dose. The images were not significantly different in overall quality.

Eyelid retraction discomfort with cotton-tipped applicator, unimanual and speculum intravitreal injection techniques: Eyelid retraction technique randomized comparison trial (Eyelid RETRACT).

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the discomfort experienced during intravitreal injections with eyelid retraction between an eyelid speculum, cotton-tipped applicator (CTA), and unimanual eyelid retraction techniques. Methods: In total, 99 patients receiving intravitreal bevacizumab were enrolled into this prospective study. Participants were randomized to one of the three methods, given subconjunctival 2% lidocaine and then injected in the superior temporal quadrant. Immediately after the procedure, each patient was given a visual analog scale (VAS) to rate their discomfort. Results: The mean pain scores for eyelid retraction with unimanual, CTA, and speculum groups were 0.788 (standard deviation [SD] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.448-1.128), 0.945 (SD 1.28, 95% CI 0.600-1.291), and 1.561 (SD 1.28, 95% CI 1.210-1.912), respectively. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.006). Post hoc analysis also revealed a difference in mean pain scores between the speculum and both the CTA and the unimanual methods. Conclusion: Our study shows that the unimanual and CTA methods for eyelid retraction are significantly less painful for patients compared to the speculum method. Patient comfort is of the utmost importance as intravitreal injections are performed millions of times a year with most patients requiring multiple injections.