Sensitivity and Specificity of Composite Indices of Remission in Male and Female Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Longitudinal Cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the sex differences in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio of the outcome indices minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) with respect to clinical remission, evaluated from both the physician and patient perspective, in a multicenter cohort of patients with PsA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts, all patients with PsA consecutively attending our rheumatology units were considered potentially eligible for the study. In all patients, a complete clinical examination was carried out. The DAPSA was calculated for each patient (DAPSA values ≤ 4 were considered as remission) and MDA was also evaluated. Patient and physician global assessment values ≤ 1 were considered as a surrogate of remission from the patient and physician perspective, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two patients with PsA were enrolled (mean age 55.7 [SD 12.4]; 141 male, 131 female). In both sexes, MDA had good sensitivity and specificity toward remission as assessed by the rheumatologist. Remission according to DAPSA had excellent values of specificity but lacks sensitivity in both sexes. PsAID ≤ 4 had excellent values of sensitivity but lacked specificity in both sexes. Remission defined by DAPSA values was found to be more sensitive and specific in female patients (45.4% and 100%, respectively) than in male patients (33.3% and 84.2%, respectively) with respect to physician-judged remission. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that some differences between the 2 sexes on the different outcome indices are possible. This could be important in the clinical management of patients with PsA.

Difficult-to-Treat Concept in Psoriatic Arthritis: Analysis of 2 Potential Definitions in a Large Group of Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 proposed criteria for difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a group of patients and to evaluate the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts of patients with PsA fulfilling the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), with at least 1 year of follow-up. A detailed medical history was collected and a physical examination was performed for all recruited patients. The proposed criteria for patients with D2T PsA were applied in our group. To test the performance of the 2 sets of criteria, we used an external validator (absence of patient acceptable symptom state + physician global assessment ≥ 6 cm). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria was assessed. RESULTS: We evaluated 378 patients with PsA (219 male/159 female), with a mean age (range) of 58 (19-75) years. Seventy-five (19.8%) patients fulfilled the D2T criteria proposed by Perrotta et al and 58 (15.3%) the D2T criteria proposed by Kumthekar et al. Both criteria showed comparable performance, with low sensitivity (Perrotta: 37.8%, Kumthekar: 29.7%) but good specificity (Perrotta: 82.1%, Kumthekar: 86.2%). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria is substantial (Fleiss κ 0.72), suggesting that both criteria identify nearly the same group of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study compared 2 published sets of criteria showing comparable performance and substantial agreement. This study may pave the way for further research in this field.

Male Fertility in Spondyloarthritis: from Clinical Issues to Cytokines Milieu. A Narrative Review.

PURPOSEOF REVIEW: Male fertility is an emergent issue that should be considered in clinical practice, when dealing with chronic inflammatory diseases in young men. As it is known, the chronic inflammation is the main pathophysiologic mechanism in some rheumatological conditions such as spondyloarthritis (SpA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Therefore, it is paramount to be aware if these diseases could impair male fertility, both due to the inflammation or to the treatments needed: we reviewed the literature on the most relevant and recent evidence on male fertility in patients affected by SpA, AS and PsA. RECENT FINDINGS: Rheumatological inflammatory diseases (included SpA, AS and PsA) could impair the family planning in man life, especially when diagnosed at young age. Moreover, focusing on sperm quality, it seems that a link between sperm quality impairment and a higher disease activity exist. Focusing on therapies, Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors showed a safety profile on human male fertility in clinical studies. Recently, a prospective study and two double-blind placebo-controlled trials assessed the impact of methotrexate and Filgotinib on semen parameters, respectively, showing a safety profile of these drugs on human semen quality. However, there are no clinical data on the impact of Interleukin (IL)17 inhibitors(i), IL12-23i and IL23i. Concerning male fertility in SpA, AS and PsA, an unmet clinical need is still present and new studies are needed to understand the association between these diseases and male fertility, and the implication of the therapies used for these diseases. This narrative review provides an overview of the available data on male fertility in patients affected by SpA, AS and PsA.

Clinical Characteristics of "Severe" Peripheral Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of severity in a multidomain disease such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still not well defined. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with severe peripheral PsA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PsA were collected at baseline and at last follow-up. We defined the severe population using the modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI); which excludes ankylosing spondylitis quality of life scale). Hence, patients with a score of 3 in at least one domain were defined as having severe PsA. Clinical characteristics of patients fulfilling the definition of severe PsA were compared to those non-severe. RESULTS: We evaluated 177 patients with peripheral PsA (M/F: 98/76). Of these, 64 (36.1%) were identified as severe according to the mCPDAI criteria, at baseline. Eighteen patients (10.1%) at last follow-up still met the definition of severe PsA. At last follow-up visit, severe patients with PsA were only males (18/18, P < 0.01) and have worse outcomes in terms of disease activity, pain, function, and impact of disease. Male sex and the severity of skin involvement at baseline were factors associated with the presence of severe PsA. The agreement between the presence of severe PsA and the absence of minimal disease activity was slight [Cohen's k: 0.174 (0.084-0.264)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that severe patients with PsA had more disease activity, pain, and impact of disease than non-severe patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that severity and disease activity are not interchangeable concepts.

Assessment of Patient-Physician Interactions in Psoriatic Arthritis: National Results of the ASSIST Study.

INTRODUCTION: An overarching principle for the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a shared decision-making process between physicians and patients. The aim of this study is to assess the patient-physician relationship in a group of patients with PsA, by using the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) and CollaboRATE instruments. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study where consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled. For each patient, the main demographic, comorbid conditions, and clinical data were collected, including the assessment of disease activity, function, quality of life, and impact of disease. PEPPI and CollaboRATE questionnaires were used, respectively, to evaluate the patient's perception of the patient-physician relationship and the shared decision-making process. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients with PsA were enrolled at four centers in Italy. Overall, our patients showed a high level of confidence in obtaining needed health care, with relatively high median (IQR) values of PEPPI (20; 16-23), and a good shared decision-making process, with high median (IQR) values of CollaboRATE questionnaire (7; 6-9). PEPPI and CollaboRATE scores showed a statistically significant inverse correlation with different clinical variables such as disease duration, Leeds Enthesitis Index, PsA impact of Disease, Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity and clinical disease activity for PsA. The presence of comorbidities did not appear to be associated with lower values of PEPPI and CollaboRATE. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, few patients with PsA were at risk of suboptimal communication with their physician. This phenomenon appeared to be primarily related to higher disease activity and burden.

Psoriatic Arthritis Acceptable Symptoms State: Does Sex Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION: The Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) is a validated instrument that is used to assess whether a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) accepts her/his disease status by asking them a simple question: "Think about all the ways your PsA has affected you during the last 48 h. If you were to remain in the next few months as you were during the last 48 h, would this be acceptable to you?" The aim of the present study was to explore any PASS differences in patients with PsA based on sex by looking at the corresponding thresholds of Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of the Disease-12 (PsAID-12) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in female and male patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that included two PsA cohorts. To identify the DAPSA, PsAID and HAQ-DI thresholds that differentiated patients who reported "yes" in response to the PASS question from those who reported "no," we used the receiver operating characteristic curves both for the female and male sexes. Moreover, Cohen's kappa test was used to determine the agreement of a PASS "yes" with DAPSA ≤ 14, PsAID ≤ 4 and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5. RESULTS: Three-hundred ten patients were considered for the study. The DAPSA, PsAID-12 and HAQ-DI thresholds that differentiated PASS "yes" patients from PASS "no" patients were 11.7, 1.85 and 0.625 in male patients and 13.3, 3.85 and 0.750 in female patients, respectively. A PASS "yes" and DAPSA ≤ 14 showed moderate agreement in males (kappa = 0.56) and good agreement in females (kappa = 0.80); the agreement between a PASS "yes" and PsAID ≤ 4 and between a PASS "yes" and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 was higher in female patients (moderate). CONCLUSION: Female patients accept their disease at higher DAPSA, PsAID and HAQ-DI values than male patients do. The clinical meaning of this could be that a female patient generally has a greater global disease acceptance inclination. Therefore, this study further supports the concept that sex differences are present in patients with PsA.