Follow-up evaluation of patients with liver test abnormalities detected during SARS-CoV2 infection.

Abnormal liver function tests (A-LFTs) during admission for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) are frequent, but its evolution after COVID-19 resolution remains unexplored. We evaluated factors related to A-LFTs during COVID-19 and assessed the liver outcome after patients' discharge. This is a observational study including: (1) retrospective analysis of variables related to A-LFTs during COVID-19; and (2) follow-up evaluation with blood test, transient elastography and liver biopsy in those with persistent A-LFTs. A-LFTs were defined according to CTCAEv4.0. Among 595 patients, 366 (61.5%) showed A-LFTs. The ratio of partial pressure of oxygen and inspired oxygen fraction (P/F) below 200, ferritin ≥1000 ng/mL, male gender and antibiotic and immunomodulatory treatments were related to A-LFTs. Follow-up evaluation was performed in 153 individuals. Persistent A-LFTs at follow-up was similar in patients with/without A-LFTs during admission (14.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.104). Fifteen (93%) and 58 (39%) patients with/without A-LFTs at follow-up showed metabolic fatty liver disease criteria (p < 0.001), which were histologically confirmed. In conclusion, A-LFTs during COVID-19 were related to infection severity. Abnormalities remitted at follow-up in >80% of patients, and no correlation between A-LFTs at admission and at follow-up was found. Most patients with A-LFTs at follow-up had non-invasive and histologically proven fatty liver disease.

Elastography is unable to exclude cirrhosis after sustained virological response in HCV-infected patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis and transient elastography (TE) correlation in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) after the sustained virological response (SVR) is unknown. AIMS: To evaluate TE accuracy at identifying cirrhosis 3 years after HCV-eradication. METHODS: Prospective, multi-centric study including HCV-cACLD patients before direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Diagnostic accuracy of TE (area under ROC, AUROC) to identify cirrhosis 3 years after SVR was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 746 HCV-infected patients (95.4% with TE ≥10 kPa), 76 (10.2%) underwent a liver biopsy 3 years after SVR. Before treatment, 46 (63%) showed a TE>15 kPa. The TE before DAA was the best variable for predicting cirrhosis (METAVIR, F4) after SVR (AUROC = 0.79). Liver function parameters, serological non-invasive tests (APRI and FIB-4), and TE values improved after SVR. However, liver biopsy 3 years after HCV elimination (median time = 38.4 months) showed cirrhosis in 41 (53.9%). Multivariate analysis (OR (95% CI), P) showed that HCV-genotype 3 (20.81 (2.12-201.47), .009), and TE before treatment (1.21 (1.09-1.34), <.001) were the only variables associated with cirrhosis after SVR. However, the accuracy of TE after SVR was poor (AUROC = 0.75) and 6 (27.3%) out of 22 patients with a TE <8 kPa had cirrhosis. Similar results were found with APRI and FIB-4 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis is present, 3 years after SVR, in more than half of HCV-cACLD patients even with the normalisation of liver function parameters, serological non-invasive tests and TE values. The low diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods after SVR reinforces the need for long-term surveillance.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for the treatment of patients with chronic HCV infection: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is approved for treating adults infected with HCV genotypes 1-6. In clinical trials, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) and was well tolerated. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were undertaken. METHODS: Real-world studies reporting SVR12 in adults with HCV infection (n ≥20) treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were identified in journal publications from January 1, 2017, to February 25, 2019, and congress presentations through April 14, 2019. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine SVR12 rates using data from ≥2 cohorts; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses included patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir who had SVR12 data available, discontinued early, or were lost to follow-up; modified ITT (mITT) analyses excluded those with non-virologic failure. Naïve pooling was used to calculate adverse event (AE) rates. RESULTS: Overall, 12,531 adults were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (18 cohorts). Of patients with post-treatment week 12 data, SVR12 rates were 96.7% (95% CI 95.4-98.1) in the ITT population (n = 8,583, 15 cohorts) and 98.1% (95% CI 97.1-99.2) in the mITT population (n = 7,001, 14 cohorts). SVR12 rates were ≥95% across subgroups (HCV genotype, cirrhosis status, treatment history, treatment duration, on-label treatment, and subgroups of interest). AEs were reported in 17.7% (1,271/7,199) of patients (8 cohorts). Serious AEs were reported in 1.0% (55/5,522) of patients (6 cohorts). The most frequent AEs were pruritus, fatigue, and headache. AE-related treatment discontinuations were reported in 0.6% (33/5,595) of patients (6 cohorts). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trials, real-world evidence indicates that glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a well-tolerated and highly effective pangenotypic treatment for a broad range of HCV-infected patients. LAY SUMMARY: It is important to assess treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the real world, as patient populations tend to be more diverse and potentially less adherent to treatment compared to those in clinical trials. Results from 18 studies performed in real-world clinics were pooled and analyzed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a direct-acting antiviral combination (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) in routine clinical practice. This analysis showed that glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is highly effective and well tolerated across all HCV genotypes and patient groups studied. It also showed that results seen in the real world are similar to the results seen in clinical trials, even in patients historically considered more challenging to treat.

Effectiveness and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir therapy in patients with chronic HCV infection: Results from the Spanish HEPA-C real-world cohort.

In randomized controlled trials of patients with chronic HCV infection, elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) demonstrated high cure rates and a good safety profile. This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of EBR/GZR, with and without ribavirin, in a real-world HCV patient cohort. HEPA-C is a collaborative, monitored national registry of HCV patients directed by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Networked Biomedical Research Centre for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases. Patients entered into HEPA-C between December 2016 and May 2017, and treated with EBR/GZR with at least end-of-treatment response data, were included. Demographic, clinical and virologic data were analysed, and adverse events (AEs) recorded. A total of 804 patients were included in the study. The majority were male (57.9%), with a mean age of 60 (range, 19-92) years. Genotype (GT) distribution was GT 1, 86.8% (1a, 14.3%; 1b, 72.5%); GT 4, 13.2% and 176 patients (21.9%) were cirrhotic. Overall, among 588 patients with available data, 570 (96.9%) achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). SVR12 rates by genotype were GT 1a, 97.7%; GT 1b, 98.6%; and GT 4, 98.1%. No significant differences in SVR12 according to fibrosis stage were observed. Eighty patients experienced an AE, resulting in treatment discontinuation in three. In this large cohort of patients with chronic HCV managed in a real-world setting in Spain, EBR/GZR achieved high rates of SVR12, comparable to those observed in randomized controlled trials, with a similarly good safety profile.

Eight weeks of Paritaprevir/r/Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir in HCV genotype 1b with mild-moderate fibrosis: Results from a real-world cohort.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The interferon-free regimen paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir + dasabuvir (PTV/r/OBV/DSV) has shown high efficacy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection when administered for 8 or 12 weeks, but data regarding the 8-week treatment are scarce. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the 8-week administration of PTV/r/OBV/DSV in a real-world cohort. METHODS: We performed a multicentre observational study from Spanish Hepa-C database including patients receiving 8 weeks of PTV/r/OBV/DSV (October 2016-November 2017). Those with advanced fibrosis, with non-genotype 1b or who were treatment-experienced were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were registered from 23 Spanish centres; eleven were excluded. At baseline, 42.5% (n = 85) were male, median (range) age was 57 (23-86), ALT was 45 (11-494) IU/mL, viral load was 6.1 (3.3-8.2) log10 IU/mL, and 74.5% had mild liver fibrosis (F0-F1) and 25.5% moderate fibrosis (F2). At the end of treatment (EOT), HCV viral load was undetectable in 100% (200/200). Seven patients relapsed after treatment discontinuation. Sustained virological response (SVR12) rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 96% (192/200). Regarding treatment safety, 2 patients developed ALT elevation >5x ULN, but there were no treatment discontinuations. One patient died 7 weeks after EOT. CONCLUSION: Treatment with PTV/r/OBV/DSV in genotype 1b-infected treatment-naive patients with mild-moderate fibrosis shows excellent efficacy and safety in real life, similarly to clinical trials. Clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT03122132.

Potential drug-drug interactions of OMBITASVIR, PARITAPREVIR/ritonavir ± DASABUVIR ± ribavirin in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir with or without dasabuvir and with or without ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV) are common in clinical trials. Our aim was to analyze the prevalence and management of potential DDIs and adverse events (AEs) related to DDIs in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) receiving OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV in clinical practice. METHODS: 177 CHC patients started OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV in 4 Spanish hospitals and were screened for potential DDIs using the University of Liverpool database. Patients were classified according to the most serious potential DDIs at baseline and AEs during therapy. RESULTS: At least one potential DDI was found in 110 (62.1%) patients: 100 (56.5%) had at least one manageable potential DDI and 10 (5.6%) at least one contraindicated. Patients with potential DDIs were receiving a higher number of concomitant drugs (4 vs. 2, P < 0.001). Routine medication was modified at baseline due to potential DDIs in 49 (27.7%) patients. During antiviral treatment, 67 (37.9%) patients presented at least one AE. In 9 (4.5%) patients, a DDI was suspected between OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV and the concomitant drug, requiring antiviral discontinuation in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Potential DDIs are frequent with OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV, although a change in baseline medication is made in only one-quarter of patients. More than half of potential DDIs were only followed, and only 5% of patients developed AEs in which the implication of DDIs could not be excluded.

Efficacy and safety of direct antiviral agents in a cohort of cirrhotic HCV/HIV-coinfected patients.

Background: New direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have shown great efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials and real-life cohorts. However, data are scarce regarding efficacy and safety in cirrhotic HCV/HIV-coinfected patients. Methods: A multicentre prospective analysis was performed in 13 Spanish hospitals, including all cirrhotic HCV/HIV-coinfected patients starting DAA combinations from January to December 2015. Sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was analysed. Withdrawal due to toxicity and/or hepatic decompensation and change in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) after HCV treatment were evaluated. Results: Patients (n = 170) were mostly male (n = 125; 74.3%) with the following HCV genotype (Gt) distribution: Gt-1a, 68 (40%); Gt-1b, 21 (12.4%); Gt-4, 47 (27.6%); and Gt-3, 26 (15.3%). Baseline median LSM was 20.6 kPa (IQR 16.1-33.7) and log10 HCV-RNA 6.1 IU/mL (IQR 5.7-6.5). Most patients had a Child-Pugh class A score (n = 127; 74.7%) and 28 (16.5%) had prior hepatic decompensation. There were 89 (52.4%) pretreated patients with 40.4% (n = 36) of null responders. Preferred regimens were as follows: sofosbuvir/ledipasvir + ribavirin, 43 (25.3%) patients; sofosbuvir + simeprevir + ribavirin, 34 (20%); sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, 26 (15.3%) and sofosbuvir + daclatasvir + ribavirin, 25 (14.7%). Overall SVR12 was 92.9% (158/170), without differences between genotypes. Pretreated patients had lower SVR12 rates compared with naive (88.8% versus 97.5%; P = 0.026). Treatment failures were as follows: 7 (4.1%) relapses; 2 (1.2%) lost to follow-up; 1 (0.6%) toxicity-related discontinuation; 1 (0.6%) hepatic decompensation; and 1 (0.6%) viral breakthrough. On-treatment hepatic decompensation was recorded in four (2.4%) patients (encephalopathy and ascites, two each). Paired LSM in 33 patients showed a decrease of 5.6 kPa (95% CI 1.8-9.2; P = 0.004). Conclusions: In our cohort of cirrhotic HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, DAAs were highly safe and efficacious. Viral eradication was associated with a significant decrease in liver stiffness.

High efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Simeprevir in a large cohort of Spanish cirrhotic patients infected with genotypes 1 and 4.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis C (HCV) therapy with Sofosbuvir (SOF)/Simeprevir (SMV) in clinical trials and real-world clinical practice, showed high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in non-cirrhotic genotype (GT)-1 and GT-4 patients. These results were slightly lower in cirrhotic patients. We investigated real-life effectiveness and safety of SOF/SMV with or without ribavirin (RBV) in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients. METHODS: This collaborative multicentre study included data from 968 patients with cirrhosis infected with HCV-GT1 or 4, treated with SOF/SMV±RBV in 30 centres across Spain between January-2014 and December-2015. Demographic, clinical, virological and safety data were analysed. RESULTS: Overall SVR was 92.3%; the majority of patients were treated with RBV (62%) for 12 weeks (92.4%). No significant differences in SVR were observed between genotypes (GT1a:94.3%; GT1b:91.7%; GT4:91.1%). Those patients with more advanced liver disease (Child B/C, MELD≥10) or portal hypertension (platelet count≤100×109 /L, transient elastography≥21 Kpa) showed significantly lower SVR rates (84.4%-91.9%) than patients with less advanced liver disease (93.8%-95.9%, P<.01 in all cases). In the multivariate analysis, the use of RBV, female gender, baseline albumin≥35 g/L, MELD<10 and lack of exposure to a triple therapy regimen were independent predictors of SVR (P<.05). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and SAE-associated discontinuation events occurred in 5.9% and 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of cirrhotic patients managed in the real-world setting in Spain, SOF/SMV±RBV yielded to excellent SVR rates, especially in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. In addition, this combination showed to be safe, with low rates of SAEs and early discontinuations.

Impact of anthropometric features on the applicability and accuracy of FibroScan® (M and XL) in overweight/obese patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Transient elastography is the reference method for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in the general population, having lower applicability in obese patients. We evaluated the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of the M and XL probes in overweight/obese patients to establish the most appropriate approach. METHODS: From May 2013 to March 2015, we evaluated patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28 kg/m2 . We constructed an algorithm with variables independently related to unreliable LSM with the M probe. RESULTS: A total of 1084 patients were evaluated. M and XL probe applicability was 88.8% and 98%, respectively. Waist circumference (WC) (OR; 95% CI; P) (0.97; 0.94-0.99; P < 0.001) and skin-capsule distance (SCD) (0.83; 0.79-0.87; P < 0.001) were independently related to unreliable LSM (M probe). The SCD was > 25 mm in 5.5% of individuals with a BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 and a WC ≤ 117 cm, with LSM (M probe) applicability rising to 94.3%. In contrast, 36.9% of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 and/or a WC > 117 cm presented an SCD > 25 mm, with M probe applicability being 73.1%. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic) using the M probe to identify significant steatosis (0.76), fibrosis (0.89), and cirrhosis (0.96) was very high in patients with a BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 and a WC ≤ 117 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The applicability and accuracy of the FibroScan® M probe to identify fibrosis and steatosis was excellent in overweight and obesity grade I (BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 ) with a WC ≤ 117 cm. The XL probe increased the applicability of transient elastography in obesity grade II-III (BMI > 35 kg/m2 ).

Aplastic Anemia and Severe Myelosuppression with Boceprevir or Simeprevir-Containing Hepatitis C Virus Treatment.

The addition of the new protease inhibitors (PIs) to peg-interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), approved for chronic hepatitis C, has clearly improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates although several adverse events have been reported with this regimens, including mild hematological toxicity. Moreover, severe pancytopenia and aplastic anemia during triple therapy with telaprevir has recently been described in seven patients. We report here two cases of severe agranulocytosis/aplastic anemia using boceprevir or simeprevir in interferon-based combination and 2 additional cases of severe myelosupression in IFN-free therapy with sofosbuvir and simeprevir plus RBV. Our observations suggest that PIs could have a sort of class-effect in developing severe hematologic toxicity or, at least, an additive interaction with other potentially myelotoxic agents such as IFN or RBV that are used in the classical regimens against HCV. Unfortunately, the mechanisms behind this phenomenon are currently unknown. In conclusion, given the lifethreatening character of these complications, close monitoring is mandatory in patients under PIs based therapy to promptly detect serious hematological toxicities and to carefully evaluate treatment discontinuation. Prospective studies assessing the usefulness of RBV in the era of new IFN-free combinations are needed.

The addition of a protease inhibitor increases the risk of infections in patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antiviral therapy with interferon and ribavirin (double therapy) is associated with a significant risk of developing bacterial infections in patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis. The addition of telaprevir or boceprevir seems to increase this risk but there are no studies yet to compare the infection rate between both treatments. We aimed to assess rate, type and predictive factors of infection in cirrhotic patients undergoing triple or double antiviral therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. 167 patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis undergoing triple therapy (cohort A) and 81 receiving double therapy (cohort B) were enrolled in the study. Only Child-Pugh A patients were included. RESULTS: The infection rate was significantly higher for patients in cohort A as compared to those in cohort B (25% vs. 9%, p=0.001). Interestingly, respiratory tract infections were significantly more frequent in patients in cohort A (12% vs. 1%; p=0.049). The use of triple antiviral therapy was the only predictive factor of infection. Severe infections were also more frequent in patients in cohort A, but the difference did not reach the level of significance (13% vs. 6%, p=0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy carries a higher risk of infections in patients with cirrhosis and changes the pattern of infection in this subpopulation. Further studies are needed in order to establish the underlying mechanism of this event.

Drug-drug interactions of telaprevir and boceprevir in HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients can modify the adherence.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The first generation protease inhibitors, boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TVR), are both CYP3A4 inhibitors, which predispose drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of potential DDIs, the management of outpatient medication and its impact on adherence and efficacy to antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected patients receiving BOC and TVR. METHODS: The usual medication starting with BOC or TVR was screened by the pharmacist of the multidisciplinary support programme (MSP) for potential DDIs. Recommendations were made to avoid significant DDIs, and changes in the baseline medication were recorded. Adherence to antiviral treatment was considered as 80/80/95% of total doses. Sustained virological response was assessed at week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: At least one potential DDI was found in 70 (64.8%) patients, 45 (54.2%) being HCV-monoinfected and 25 (100%) HIV/HCV-coinfected (P < 0.01). Baseline treatment modifications were required in 38 (35.2%) patients. Adherence and SVR12 were higher in patients without DDIs (86.8%) and (67.6%) compared to those with DDIs (62.8%) (P = 0.021) and (47.2%) (P = 0.097) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients were at risk of presenting DDIs, leading to changes in the baseline medication in one-third of the patients. Drug interactions are frequent in patients with lower adherence.

Hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis after liver transplantation: a case-control study.

Cirrhosis recurrence is frequent after orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Because transplantation causes liver denervation, we hypothesized that the response to propranolol might differ in transplant patients versus nontransplant patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Twenty-one patients with cirrhosis recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation with portal hypertension were compared to 20 nontransplant patients with cirrhosis, HCV, and portal hypertension, and they were matched by sex, age, presence of varices, and Child-Pugh score. The patients underwent systemic and hepatic hemodynamic measurements at the baseline and 20 minutes after intravenous propranolol (0.15 mg/kg). At the baseline, the transplant patients with cirrhosis had a lower hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than the nontransplant patients with cirrhosis (14.8 ± 2.9 versus 17.3 ± 4.4 mm Hg, P = 0.03) but a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP; 100.3 ± 12.3 versus 91.8 ± 11.6 mm Hg, P = 0.04) and higher systemic vascular resistance (2253 ± 573 versus 1883 ± 525 dyn/second/cm(-5) , P = 0.03). There were no differences in the cardiac index (CI). Propranolol significantly decreased HVPG to similar extents in transplant patients and nontransplant patients with cirrhosis (-14.1% ± 8.0% versus -16.9% ± 9.5%, P > 0.99). MAP tended to increase in transplant patients with cirrhosis, whereas it slightly decreased in nontransplant patients (5.1% ± 14.2% versus -4.8% ± 6.4%, P = 0.007); however, the reduction in CI was less marked in transplant patients with cirrhosis (-18.6% ± 7.6% versus -26.9% ± 9.0%, P = 0.005). In conclusion, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and portal hypertension after orthotopic liver transplantation have lower baseline HVPG values but similar HVPG responses to propranolol infusions in comparison with nontransplant patients with cirrhosis. In contrast to nontransplant patients, propranolol increases the systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressure in transplant patients with cirrhosis and attenuates the fall in CI.

Past, present, and future of long-term treatment for hepatitis B virus.

The estimated world prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is 316 million. HBV infection was identified in 1963 and nowadays is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite universal vaccination programs, and effective antiviral therapy. Long-term administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) has been the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis B during the last decades. The NA has shown a good safety profile and high efficacy in controlling viral replication, improving histology, and decreasing the HCC incidence, decompensation, and mortality. However, the low probability of HBV surface antigen seroclearance made necessary an indefinite treatment. The knowledge, in recent years, about the different phases of the viral cycle, and the new insights into the role of the immune system have yielded an increase in new therapeutic approaches. Consequently, several clinical trials evaluating combinations of new drugs with different mechanisms of action are ongoing with promising results. This integrative literature review aims to assess the knowledge and major advances from the past of hepatitis B, the present of NA treatment and withdrawal, and the future perspectives with combined molecules to achieve a functional cure.

Clinical Guideline on Perioperative Management of Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

(1) Background: Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) are living longer with more comorbidities because of improved medical and surgical management. However, patients with ACLD are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality; (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to support a narrative clinical guideline about the assessment of mortality risk and management of perioperative morbidity in patients with ACLD undergoing surgical procedures; (3) Results: Slight data exist to guide the perioperative management of patients with ACLD, and most recommendations are based on case series and expert opinion. The severity of liver dysfunction, portal hypertension, cardiopulmonary and renal comorbidities, and complexity of surgery and type (elective versus emergent) are predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Expert multidisciplinary teams are necessary to evaluate and manage ACLD before, during, and after surgical procedures; (4) Conclusions: This clinical practice document updates the available data and recommendations to optimize the management of patients with advanced chronic liver disease who undergo surgical procedures.

Comparison of Surgical Risk Scores in a European Cohort of Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) or cirrhosis undergoing surgery have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in contrast to the general population. This is a retrospective, observational study to evaluate the predictive capacity of surgical risk scores in European patients with ACLD. Cirrhosis was defined by the presence of thrombocytopenia with <150,000/uL and splenomegaly, and AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index >2, a nodular liver edge seen via ultrasound, transient elastography of >15 kPa, and/or signs of portal hypertension. We assessed variables related to 90-day mortality and the discrimination and calibration of current surgical scores (Child-Pugh, MELD-Na, MRS, NSQIP, and VOCAL-Penn). Only patients with ACLD and major surgeries included in VOCAL-Penn were considered (n = 512). The mortality rate at 90 days after surgery was 9.8%. Baseline disparities between the H. Mar and VOCAL-Penn cohorts were identified. Etiology, obesity, and platelet count were not associated with mortality. The VOCAL-Penn showed the best discrimination (C-statistic90D = 0.876) and overall predictive capacity (Brier90D = 0.054), but calibration was not excellent in our cohort. VOCAL-Penn was suboptimal in patients with diabetes (C-statistic30D = 0.770), without signs of portal hypertension (C-statistic30D = 0.555), or with abdominal wall (C-statistic30D = 0.608) or urgent (C-statistic180D = 0.692) surgeries. Our European cohort has shown a mortality rate after surgery similar to those described in American studies. However, some variables included in the VOCAL-Penn score were not associated with mortality, and VOCAL-Penn's discriminative ability decreases in patients with diabetes, without signs of portal hypertension, and with abdominal wall or urgent surgeries. These results should be validated in larger multicenter and prospective studies.

Current Perspectives on Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy for the Long-Term Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus.

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem. This review presents updated recommendations for the optimal current treatment of choice with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Current clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases have been considered. Patients with chronic HBV infection are at increased risk of liver disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. The main goal of therapy is to improve survival preventing disease progression and HCC. The induction of long-term suppression of HBV replication represents the main endpoint of current treatment strategies, while hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is the optimal endpoint. The typical indication for treatment requires elevated HBV desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), elevated alanine aminotransferase and/or at least moderate histological lesions, while all cirrhotic patients with detectable HBV DNA should be treated. The long-term administration of a potent NA with high barrier to resistance, ie, entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide, represents the treatment of choice. However, HBsAg seroclearance is anecdotal with NA. Treated patients should be monitored for therapy response, adherence, risk of disease progression, and risk of HCC development. This review aims to assess the evolving trends on the potent NA and the new perspectives on finite therapy.

On-therapy HBsAg kinetics can predict HBsAg loss after nucleos(t)ide analogues interruption in HBeAg-negative patients. The cup is half full and half empty.

BACKGROUND: Nucleos(t)ide analogues withdrawal may improve HBsAg loss rates. However, conditions to select patients are not well established. AIMS: to evaluate the impact of HBsAg kinetics before treatment interruption on post-treatment response. METHODS: Longitudinal, ambispective study in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B HBeAg-negative patients, analysing on-treatment and post-treatment HBsAg kinetics. On-treatment HBsAg kinetics diagnostic accuracy (AUROC) to identify HBsAg loss was evaluated. RESULTS: 52 HBeAg-negative patients stopped treatment after 8.2 years, and 6 (11.5%) achieved HBsAg loss one year after withdrawal. Multivariate analysis showed that on-treatment HBsAg kinetics was related to HBsAg loss (OR=0.10; 95%CI=0.016-0.632; p = 0.014) with a high diagnostic accuracy (AUROC=0.935). A significant HBsAg decline ≥1 log10 IU/mL showed a positive and negative predictive value of 50% and of 97.6%, respectively. After treatment interruption, HBsAg decline speed (log10 IU/mL/year) accelerated in patients treated >6 years (from -0.06 to -0.20, p<0.05) and remained stable in treated <6 years (from -0.12 to -0.12 p=ns). CONCLUSIONS: On-treatment HBsAg kinetics can predict post-treatment HBsAg loss rate. Half of patients with a significant HBsAg decline can eliminate HBsAg the first year after withdrawal. Post-treatment HBsAg decline is faster not only in patients who lost the HBsAg but also in those who remain HBsAg-positive.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care and outcomes of people with NAFLD-related cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on health systems and many chronic diseases globally. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the first year of the pandemic on the outcomes of people with NAFLD cirrhosis. Methods: We conducted a before-after study in four University hospitals in Catalonia, Spain. Study subperiods were divided into Pre-pandemic (March/2019-February/2020) vs. Pandemic (March/2020-February/2021). The primary outcome was the rate of first liver-related event (LRE). Overall clinical outcomes (LREs plus cardiovascular plus all-cause mortality) were also assessed. Results: A total of 354 patients were included, all of whom were compensated at the beginning of the study period; 83 individuals (23.5%) had a history of prior hepatic decompensation. Mean age was 67.3 years and 48.3% were female. Median BMI was 31.2 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes was present in 72.8% of patients. The rates of first LRE in the Pre-pandemic and Pandemic periods were 7.4% and 11.3% (p = 0.12), respectively. Whilst the rate of overall events was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (9.9% vs. 17.8%; p = 0.009), this was strongly associated with COVID-19-related deaths. The rate of worsened metabolic status was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (38.4% vs. 46.1%; p = 0.041), yet this was not associated with the risk of first LRE during the Pandemic period, whereas type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; 95% CI 1.15-12.32; p = 0.028), albumin <4 g/L (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.76-11.17; p = 0.002) and Fibrosis-4 score >2.67 (OR 15.74; 95% CI 2.01-123.22; p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors in the multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Overall, people with NAFLD cirrhosis did not present poorer liver-related outcomes during the first year of the pandemic. Health system preparedness seems key to ensure that people with NAFLD cirrhosis receive appropriate care during health crises. Lay summary: Mobility restrictions and social stress induced by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to increased alcohol drinking and worsened metabolic control (e.g., weight gain, poor control of diabetes) in a large proportion of the population in many countries. We aimed to analyze whether people with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, who are particularly vulnerable to such lifestyle modifications, were significantly impacted during the first year of the pandemic. We compared the clinical situation of 354 patients one year before the pandemic and one year after. We found that although metabolic control was indeed worse after the first year of the pandemic and patients presented worse clinical outcomes, the latter was mostly due to non-liver causes, namely COVID-19 itself. Moreover, the care provided to these patients did not worsen during the first year of the pandemic.