Identification of mutations in the AIPL1, CRB1, GUCY2D, RPE65, and RPGRIP1 genes in patients with juvenile retinitis pigmentosa.

OBJECTIVE: To identify mutations in the AIPL1, CRB1, GUCY2D, RPE65, and RPGRIP1 genes in patients with juvenile retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: Mutation analysis was carried out in a group of 35 unrelated patients with juvenile autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA), or juvenile isolated retinitis pigmentosa (IRP), by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography followed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: All three groups of patients showed typical combinations of eye signs associated with retinitis pigmentosa: pale optic discs, narrow arterioles, pigmentary changes, and nystagmus. Mutations were found in 34% of PATIENTS: in CRB1 (11%), GUCY2D (11%), RPE65 (6%), and RPGRIP1 (6%). Nine mutations are reported, including a new combination of two mutations in CRB1, and new mutations in GUCY2D and RPGRIP1. The new GUCY2D mutation (c.3283delC, p.Pro1069ArgfsX37) is the first pathological sequence change reported in the intracellular C-terminal domain of GUCY2D, and did not lead to the commonly associated LCA, but to a juvenile retinitis pigmentosa phenotype. The polymorphic nature of three previously described (pathological) sequence changes in AIPL1, CRB1, and RPGRIP1 was established. Seven new polymorphic changes, useful for further association studies, were found. CONCLUSIONS: New and previously described sequence changes were detected in retinitis pigmentosa in CRB1, GUCY2D, and RPGRIP1; and in LCA patients in CRB1, GUCY2D, and RPE65. These data, combined with previous reports, suggest that LCA and juvenile ARRP are closely related and belong to a continuous spectrum of juvenile retinitis pigmentosa.

Enhanced activity of deoxycytidine kinase after pulsed low dose rate and single dose gamma irradiation.

In both pulsed low dose rate (LDR) and single high dose radiation schedules, gemcitabine pretreatment sensitizes tumor cells to radiation. These radiosensitizing effects could be the result of decreased DNA repair. In this study, the effect of irradiation on the deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) needed for DNA repair was investigated. The activity of dCK, a deoxynucleoside analogue-activating enzyme was increased upon irradiation in both schedules. No change in dCK protein expression was observed that indicates a post-translational regulation. The benefit of this increased activity induced by irradiation should be further investigated in combination with deoxynucleoside analogues activated by this enzyme.

Expression of deoxycytidine kinase in leukaemic cells compared with solid tumour cell lines, liver metastases and normal liver.

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is required for the phosphorylation of several deoxyribonucleoside analogues that are widely employed as chemotherapeutic agents. Examples include cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CdA) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and gemcitabine to treat solid tumours. In this study, expression of dCK mRNA was measured by a competitive template reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (CT RT-PCR) in seven cell lines of different histological origin, 16 childhood and adult AML samples, 10 human liver samples and 11 human liver metastases of colorectal cancer origin. The enzyme activity and protein expression levels of dCK in the cell lines were closely related to the mRNA expression levels (r=0.75, P=0.026 and r=0.86, P=0.007). In AML samples, dCK mRNA expression ranged from 1.16 to 35.25 (x10(-3)xdCK/beta-actin). In the cell line panel, the range was 2.97-56.9 (x10(-3)xdCK/beta-actin) of dCK mRNA expression. The enzyme activity in liver metastases was correlated to dCK mRNA expression (r=0.497, P=0.05). In the liver samples, these were not correlated. dCK mRNA expression showed only a 36-fold range in liver while a 150-fold range was observed in the liver metastases. In addition, dCK activity and mean mRNA levels were 2.5-fold higher in the metastases than in the liver samples. Since dCK is associated with the sensitivity to deoxynucleoside analogues and because of the good correlation between the different dCK measurements in malignant cells and tumours, the CT-RT PCR assay will be useful in the selection of patients that can be treated with deoxycytidine analogues.

Combination chemotherapy studies with gemcitabine and etoposide in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancer cell lines.

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) and etoposide (4'-demethylepipodo-phyllo-toxin-9-4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-g lucopyranoside, VP-16) are antineoplastic agents with clinical activity against various types of solid tumors. Because of the low toxicity profile of dFdC and the differences in mechanisms of cytotoxicity, combinations of both drugs were studied in vitro. For this purpose, we used the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum-resistant and VP-16 cross-resistant variant ADDP, and two non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, Lewis Lung (LL, murine) and H322 (human). The interaction between the drugs was determined with the multiple drug effect analysis (fixed molar ratio) and with a variable drug ratio. In the LL cell line, the combination of dFdC and VP-16 at a constant molar ratio (dFdC:VP-16 = 1:4 or 1:0.125 after 4- or 24-hr exposure, respectively) was synergistic (combination index [CI], calculated at 50% growth inhibition = 0.7 and 0.8, respectively; CI <1 indicating synergism). After 24- and 72-hr exposure to both drugs at a constant ratio, additivity was found in the A2780, ADDP, and H322 cell lines (dFdC:VP-16 = 1:500 for both exposure times in these cell lines). When cells were exposed to a combination of dFdC and VP-16 for 24 or 72 hr, with VP-16 at its IC25 and dFdC in a concentration range, additivity was found in both the LL and H322 cells; synergism was observed in the A2780 and ADDP cells, which are the least sensitive to VP-16. Schedule dependency was found in the LL cell line; when cells were exposed to dFdC 4 hr prior to VP-16 (constant molar ratio, total exposure 24 hr), synergism was found (CI = 0.5), whereas additivity was found when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC (CI = 1.6). The mechanism of interaction between the drugs was studied in more detail in the LL cell line; dFdCTP accumulation was 1.2-fold enhanced by co-incubation with VP-16, and was even more pronounced (1.4-fold) when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC. dCTP levels were decreased by VP-16 alone as well as by the combination of both compounds, which may favor phosphorylation of dFdC, thereby increasing dFdCTP accumulation. DNA strand break (DSB) formation was increased for exposure to both compounds together compared to exposure to each compound separately, this effect being most pronounced when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC (38% and 0% DSB for dFdC and VP-16 alone, respectively and 97% DSB for the combination). The potentiation in DSB formation might be a result of the inhibition of DNA repair by dFdC. Provided the right schedule is used, VP-16 is certainly a compound eligible for combination with dFdC.

Quantitative real time PCR of deoxycytidine kinase mRNA by Light Cycler PCR; in relation to enzyme activity.

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for the phosphorylation of several deoxyribonucleosides and various analogues such as gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine). We developed and optimized a sensitive real time Light Cycler (LC) PCR assay for dCK with SYBR green detection. The enzymatic activity measured in the same human xenografts of dCK correlated excellently with dCK mRNA expression levels measured by the LC. This assay can be used for evaluation of dCK expression in tumors.

Intravesical administration of gemcitabine in superficial bladder cancer: a phase I study with pharmacodynamic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in a phase I trial, the local and systemic toxicity and pharmacodynamics of intravesical gemcitabine in patients with superficial bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma localized to the bladder wall (stage T1 or Ta) resistant to previous administration of anticancer drugs and/or of bacille Calmette-Guérin were enrolled. They initially received intravesical gemcitabine starting at 500 mg and increased in 500 mg increments to 2000 mg. Three patients were treated at each dose level. RESULTS: There was no evidence of systemic toxicity and local toxicity was minimal. A pharmacological evaluation showed that gemcitabine was undetectable in plasma and its inactive metabolite (2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine) was present at a mean (SD) concentration of 1.39 (1.05) mumol/L Deoxycytidine kinase was present in tumour tissue samples, and its activity was 27.3 (12.6) pmol/h/mg tissue; deoxycytidine deaminase activity varied from undetectable to 616 pmol/h/mg tissue. CONCLUSION: Intravesical gemcitabine appears to be well tolerated with no systemic and minimal local toxicity even at the highest dose (2000 mg). A phase II trial of intravesical gemcitabine at 2000 mg given weekly for six consecutive weeks is now in progress in patients with superficial bladder cancer.

Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing human cancer cell lines.

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a deoxycytidine analogue that is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently to its triphosphate dFdCTP, which is incorporated into both RNA and DNA, leading to DNA damage. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is characterised by an overexpression of the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein (P-gP) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). Gemcitabine was tested against human melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, epidermoid carcinoma and ovarian cancer cells with an MDR phenotype as a result of selection by drug exposure or by transfection with the mdr1 gene. These cell lines were nine- to 72-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental cell lines. The doxorubicin-resistant cells 2R120 (MRP1) and 2R160 (P-gP) were nine- and 28-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental SW1573 cells, respectively (P<0.01), which was completely reverted by 25 micro M verapamil. In 2R120 and 2R160 cells, dCK activities were seven- and four-fold higher than in SW1573, respectively, which was associated with an increased dCK mRNA and dCK protein. Inactivation by deoxycytidine deaminase was 2.9- and 2.2-fold decreased in 2R120 and 2R160, respectively. dFdCTP accumulation was similar in SW1573 and its MDR variants after 24 h exposure to 0.1 micro M gemcitabine, but dFdCTP was retained longer in 2R120 (P<0.001) and 2R160 (P<0.003) cells. 2R120 and 2R160 cells also incorporated four- and six-fold more [(3)H]gemcitabine into DNA (P<0.05), respectively. P-glycoprotein and MRP1 overexpression possibly caused a cellular stress resulting in increased gemcitabine metabolism and sensitivity, while reversal of collateral gemcitabine sensitivity by verapamil also suggests a direct relation between the presence of membrane efflux pumps and gemcitabine sensitivity.

Sequence dependent effect of paclitaxel on gemcitabine metabolism in relation to cell cycle and cytotoxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are active agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To optimize treatment drug combinations, simultaneously and 4 and 24 h intervals, were studied using DNA flow cytometry and multiple drug effect analysis in the NSCLC cell lines H460, H322 and Lewis Lung. All combinations resulted in comparable cytotoxicity, varying from additivity to antagonism (combination index: 1.0-2.6). Gemcitabine caused a S (48%) and G1 (64%) arrest at IC-50 and 10 x IC-50 concentrations, respectively. Paclitaxel induced G2/M arrest (70%) which was maximal within 24 h at 10 x IC-50. Simultaneous treatment increased S-phase arrest, while at the 24 h interval after 72 h the first drug seemed to dominate the effect. Apoptosis was more pronounced when paclitaxel preceded gemcitabine (20% for both intervals) as compared to the reverse sequence (8%, P = 0.173 for the 4 h and 12%, P = 0.051 for the 24 h time interval). In H460 cells, paclitaxel increased 2-fold the accumulation of dFdCTP, the active metabolite of gemcitabine, in contrast to H322 cells. Paclitaxel did not affect deoxycytidine kinase levels, but ribonucleotide levels increased possibly explaining the increase in dFdCTP. Paclitaxel did not affect gemcitabine incorporation into DNA, but seemed to increase incorporation into RNA. Gemcitabine almost completely inhibited DNA synthesis in both cell lines (70-89%), while paclitaxel had a minor effect and did not increase that of gemcitabine. In conclusion, various gemcitabine-paclitaxel combinations did not show sequence dependent cytotoxic effects; all combinations were not more than additive. However, since paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation, gemcitabine incorporation into RNA and the apoptotic index, the administration of paclitaxel prior to gemcitabine might be favourable as compared to reversed sequences.