Treating Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysm by Tumescence Anesthesia and Echo-Guided Compression Technique (TACT): Clinical Outcome in 82 Consecutive Patients.

PURPOSE: Pseudoaneurysm (PA) of the access artery is a common and potentially severe complication after percutaneous endovascular interventions. Most PA require interventional therapy, including thrombin injection, covered stent implantation, or surgical repair, which are costly and associated with other complications. Treating PA by external compression is uncomfortable and time consuming, with a low success rate. By injecting local tumescence anesthesia around the PA and close to its neck, the tumescence anesthesia and echo-guided compression technique (TACT) aims to improve efficacy and patient's comfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients treated for femoral PA in our center from May 2009 to July 2019 and estimated efficacy and safety. Vascular specialists performed TACT according to a standardized protocol including ultrasound-guided injection of tumescence solution (45 ml of 0.9% saline, 15 ml of lidocaine 1%/epinephrine 5 µg/ml) in the soft tissue around the PA and its neck, local compression with the sonography probe until PA closure, and external compression by elastic belt for 3 hours. RESULTS: Among a total of 125 patients with femoral artery PA, 82 (65.6%) were treated by TACT (including 3 patients with haemorrhagic shock), 14 (11.2%) by thrombin injection; 12 (9.6%) by endovascular interventions; 8 (6.4%) by open surgery; and 9 (7.2%) conservatively. In patients treated by TACT, PA neck was short (<1 cm) in 51.8% and mean cavity diameter 30 ± 23 mm. After injection of 58 ± 8 ml of tumescence solution, mean time of echo-guided compression was 12 ± 8 minutes. Pseudoaneurysm was successfully closed in 92.7% after the first attempt and in 96.3% after the second attempt. The intervention was well tolerated, without any adverse event. CONCLUSION: Tumescence anesthesia and echo-guided compression technique (TACT) is an effective and safe treatment for PA. Compared to other therapies, TACT is minimally invasive and widely available for minimal costs, even for large PA and in unstable patients. CLINICAL IMPACT: Tumescence anesthesia and echo-guided compression technique seems to be an efficient, safe, and a fair economical choice in comparison with alternative techniques. The implementation of this procedure is simple with low risk of complications. Based on the results of this study, we believe that TACT should be considered as the first-line treatment of most iatrogenic PA.

Arterial Preparation by Longitudinal Micro-Incisions Before Balloon Angioplasty of the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Artery: Acute and 12-Month Results.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with conventional plain old balloon (POBA) and/or drug-coated balloon (DCB) is the primary intervention to treat peripheral artery stenoses. However, acute dissections during the procedure and potential for future target lesion revascularization remain procedural complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the acute and 12-month outcomes in patients who underwent novel vessel preparation with longitudinal, controlled-depth micro-incisions prior to PTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease with a Rutherford class of 2 to 6 and >70% de novo stenosis of the superficial femoral or popliteal arteries were included in this retrospective study. Patients with thrombotic or embolic lesions, restenosis, or in-stent restenosis were excluded. The FLEX Vessel Prep System (FLEX VP) was used to prepare the vessel prior to PTA by creating micro-incisions at the target lesion. The FLEX VP was followed by POBA or paclitaxel DCB. RESULTS: The study included 65 patients. Lesion characteristics were 90% median stenosis (range = 70%-100%), 75.4% mild-to-severe calcifications, and 33.8% occlusion rate, and median lesion length was 196 (range = 10-480) mm. Following vessel preparation, 82.1% of the patients had low severity dissection or no flow-limiting dissection. The provisional stent rate postprocedure was 16.9%, with a median stent length of 60 mm. The freedom from target lesion revascularization (FFTLR) in 63 evaluable patients at 6 and 12 months was 98.4% and 93.7%, respectively. Freedom from amputation was 100%. CONCLUSION: In this real-world/all-comers patient population with long, stenotic lesions across the calcification spectrum, vessel preparation with longitudinal micro-incisions prior to PTA was associated with low dissection rate, low dissection severity, low stent implantation, and high FFTLR with the absence of amputation at 12 months relative to published reports in long-lesion cohorts. These results support vessel preparation via micro-incisions.

Impact of concomitant popliteal vein thrombosis in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with endovascular early thrombus removal.

Background: Catheter-based thrombus removal (CBTR) reduces the risk of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF-DVT). However, the impact of concomitant popliteal DVT on clinical and duplex sonographic outcomes is unknown. Patients and methods: In this post-hoc analysis including the entire cohort of the randomized controlled BERNUTIFUL trial (48 patients), we compared clinical (incidence/severity of PTS assessed by Villalta score and revised venous clinical severity scores, rVCSS), disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL, CIVIQ-20 survey) and duplex sonographic outcomes (patency, reflux, post-thrombotic lesions) at 12 months follow-up between patients with IF-DVT with and without concomitant popliteal DVT treated by CBTR. Results: Overall, 48 IF-DVT patients were included (48% men, median age of 50 years), of whom 17 (35%) presented with popliteal DVT. At baseline, patients with popliteal DVT were older, had a higher body mass index and more important leg swelling. At 12 months, freedom from PTS (93% vs 87%, P=0.17), median total Villalta score (1 vs 1.5; P=0.46), rVCSS (2 vs 1.5, P=0.5) and disease-specific QOL (24 points vs 24 points, P=0.72) were similar between patient with and without popliteal DVT, respectively. Duplex sonographic outcomes were similar, except for more frequent popliteal post-thrombotic lesions and reflux (P=0.02) in patients with popliteal DVT. Conclusions: Relevant clinical outcomes 1 year after successful CBTR were favorable, regardless of the presence or absence of concomitant popliteal DVT. However, post-thrombotic popliteal vein lesions and reflux are more frequent in IF-DVT patients with popliteal involvement. Their impact on long-term outcomes remains to be investigated.

Duplex Ultrasound Investigation for the Detection of Obstructed Iliocaval Venous Stents.

OBJECTIVE: Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is used for routine surveillance of stents in iliocaval veins, but direct visualisation is often challenging. Duplex ultrasound criteria for detecting venous stent obstruction (VSO) have not been defined to date. METHODS: A nested case control study of 120 patients (42 ± 17 years, 53% women, mean 2.7 ± 1.8 stents) was performed, and the performance of various duplex parameters for detecting VSO (defined as > 50% lumen diameter reduction or occlusion) was tested, confirmed by biplane venography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Forty patients with VSO (25 with stent occlusion, 15 with >50% in stent stenosis) were matched to 80 control patients by age, gender and index diagnosis who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) ongoing symptom control (Villalta score < 5), (2) good image quality of entire stent segment, (3) spontaneous colour Doppler signal > 50% of lumen in entire stent segment, (4) at least two DUS where the baseline DUS was obtained within 24 h after successful venous intervention. RESULTS: The best test was the combination of peak flow velocity and flow pattern analysis at the stent inlet. A peak flow velocity >10 cm/s and a flow pattern spontaneously modulated by respiration ruled out VSO with a specificity of 93.7% (95% CI 86.0%-97.3%). A peak flow velocity ≤10 cm/s or any Doppler flow pattern other than spontaneously modulated by respiration was 92.1% (95% CI 79.2%-97.3%) sensitive to detect VSO. CONCLUSION: The combination of peak flow velocity and analysis of Doppler flow pattern at the stent inlet is accurate to diagnose or rule out stent occlusion. Indirect criteria should always be combined with direct visualisation of iliocaval stents since those may be less sensitive for detecting stent stenosis.

Venous Thromboembolism and Renal Impairment: Insights from the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER).

Renal impairment (RI) has increased substantially over the last decades. In the absence of data from confirmatory research, real-life data on anticoagulation treatment and clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with RI are needed. In the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER), 2,062 consecutive patients with objectively confirmed VTE were enrolled. In the present analysis, we compared characteristics, initial and maintenance anticoagulation, and adjusted 90-day clinical outcomes of those with (defined as estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) and without severe RI. Overall, 240 (12%) patients had severe RI; they were older, and more frequently had chronic and acute comorbidities. VTE severity was similar between patients with and without severe RI. Initial anticoagulation in patients with severe RI was more often performed with unfractionated heparin (44 vs. 24%), and less often with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (52 vs. 61%) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; 4 vs. 12%). Maintenance anticoagulation in patients with severe RI was more frequently managed with vitamin K antagonists (70 vs. 60%) and less frequently with DOAC (12 vs. 21%). Severe RI was associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality (9.2 vs. 4.2%, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-3.65), but with similar risk of recurrent VTE (3.3 vs. 2.8%, HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.57-2.52) and major bleeding (2.1 vs. 2.0%, HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.41-2.68). In patients with severe RI, the use of LMWH versus any other treatment was associated with reduced mortality (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.14-0.94; p = 0.036) and similar rate of major bleeding (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.17-2.00; p = 0.39). Acute or chronic comorbidities rather than VTE severity or recurrence may explain increased early mortality in patients with severe RI. The higher rate of VTE recurrence, specifically fatal events, than major bleeding reinforces the need for effective anticoagulation in VTE patients with severe RI.

Cessation of anticoagulation therapy following endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy (AT) following catheter-based therapy of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with stent placement is unknown. Theoretically, resolving the underlying obstructive iliac vein lesion by a stent may eliminate the main trigger for recurrence, the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and the need for extended-duration AT. Patients and methods: From 113 patients with acute IFDVT who underwent endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement, we compared patency rates and clinical outcomes between 58 patients on limited-duration AT (3-12 month) and 55 patients on extended-duration AT (> 12 months). Results: Mean follow-up duration was 26 ± 18 (range 3-77) months; it was 24 ± 18 (range 3-69) months after cessation of AT in the limited-duration AT group. In comparison to patients with extended-duration AT, patients with limited-duration AT were younger (38 versus 54 years; p < 0.001), more often female (74 % versus 49 %; p = 0.01), and had less often prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) (9 % versus 35 %; p = 0.001). May-Thurner syndrome was more frequent in the limited-duration AT group (66 % versus 38 %; p = 0.004). Overall, primary and secondary patency rates at 24 months were 80 % (95 % CI, 70-87 %) and 95 % (95 % CI, 88-98 %), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Overall, 17 (15 %) patients developed recurrent VTE, of which 14 (82 %) events were thrombotic stent occlusions, and 13 (76 %) events occurred during AT. In the limited-duration AT group, 98 % patients were free from the PTS at two years with a VTE recurrence rate of 3.5 per 100 patient years after cessation of AT. Conclusions: In selected patients with acute IFDVT and patent venous stent, particularly in younger and otherwise healthy patients with May-Thurner syndrome, it appears to be safe to discontinue AT 3-12 months after endovascular treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered on the National Institutes of Health website (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT02433054).

Endovascular treatment of post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliofemoral venous outflow obstructions with self-expanding nitinol stents.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate venous patency and clinical outcomes for endovascular treatment of iliofemoral venous obstruction in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion (NIVL) with dedicated self-expanding nitinol stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the prospective Swiss Venous Stent Registry, enrolling consecutive patients with a standardized follow-up procedure since January 2008. Patency was evaluated by duplex sonography and clinical outcome by various scores including the Villalta score at baseline, three, six, and 12 months, and then annually after endovascular therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 93 patients (64 PTS, 29 NIVL) were analysed. Mean follow-up time was 20 ± 16 (range 3-70) months. A total of 11 (12 %) patients had a stent occlusion, all of which occurred in the PTS group, and 13 (14 %) patients had a symptomatic stent stenosis. Primary patency was 79 % (95 % CI 68-87 %) at 12 months and 72 % (95 % CI 59-82 %) at 24 months. In PTS patients, primary patency at 12 months was 75 % (95 % CI 61-84 %) vs. 89 % (95 % CI 63-97 %) in NIVL patients (p = 0.10). Secondary patency at 24 months was 94 % (95 % CI 84-98 %) in PTS and 100 % in NIVL, p = 0.19). Overall, 62 (67 %) patients were free from PTS at the latest follow-up with a Villalta score < 5 points. Predictive factors for the loss of primary patency were stents placed below the inguinal ligament (OR 2.59, 95 % CI, 0.99-6.84, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with chronic iliofemoral vein obstruction, endovascular therapy with self-expanding nitinol stents was associated with favourable patency rates and clinical improvement in the majority of patients.

Early clinical outcomes of a novel rheolytic directional thrombectomy technique for patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with first-generation techniques is often incomplete and adjunctive conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is required in more than half of patients to achieve venous patency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the prospective Bern Venous Stent Registry, we investigated rates of primary treatment success, primary patency, and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) from 40 consecutive patients (mean age 51 ± 19 years, 45 % women) with acute iliofemoral DVT, treated with a novel directional RT technology and stent placement. Overall, 24 patients were treated for native-vessel iliofemoral DVT (11 with single-session RT, 13 with bail-out RT after failed CDT) and 16 for iliofemoral stent thrombosis. Pulse-spray thrombolysis (r-tPA 10 mg) was performed in 29 (73 %) patients. The mean follow-up duration was 193 ± 132 days (minimum 90 days). RESULTS: Overall, primary treatment success of RT was 95 %; only two patients required adjunctive CDT to restore patency. In 24 patients with native-vessel DVT, six-month primary patency was 92 % (95 %CI 75-99 %), and 23 patients (96 %) were free from the PTS according to the Villalta score. In 16 patients with stent thrombosis, six-month primary patency was 63 % (95 %CI 35-85 %) and 50 % were free from PTS. Except for transient macroscopic haemoglobinuria in all patients, no other side effects were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with iliofemoral DVT of native or stented vessels, RT followed by stent placement appears to be effective and safe. The novel technique enables single-session DVT treatment in the majority of patients without the need for prolonged CDT.

[Interventional treatment of venous insufficiency]. / Prise en charge interventionnelle de l'insuffisance veineuse superficielle des membres inférieurs.

Interventional treatment of venous insufficiency has been revolutionized by endovascular techniques. Some of these techniques, and particularly thermal ablation (endovenous laser, radiofrequency) are now recommended as first-line therapy in the latest international guidelines. This is because of less post-operative pain, a shorter leave from employment and similar or lower recurrence rate. Endovenous techniques allow safer and more efficient treatment of certain particular conditions : small saphenous vein, ulcers, and recurrent varicose veins. In addition to clinical history and examination, a duplex sonography of deep and superficial veins, performed by an angiologist, is the most important exam in order to determine proper indication and best treatment strategy for each patient.

La prise en charge de l'insuffisance veineuse des membres inférieurs a été révolutionnée par l'avènement des techniques endoveineuses. En particulier, l'ablation thermique par laser endoveineux, ou radiofréquence des troncs saphéniens, a remplacé la chirurgie comme technique de référence dans les dernières guidelines publiées, notamment en raison d'une diminution des douleurs postinterventionnelles et de la durée d'incapacité de travail avec un taux de récidives identique, voire inférieur. Les techniques endoveineuses permettent, en outre, de traiter certaines indications avec un niveau d'efficacité et de sécurité accru : traitement de la petite veine saphène, ulcères et récidives de varices. Afin de déterminer l'indication et la meilleure stratégie de prise en charge, un bilan veineux par écho-Doppler par un angiologue est une étape obligatoire.

Fixed low-dose ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism.

AIMS: No standardized local thrombolysis regimen exists for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of fixed low-dose ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) for intermediate- and high-risk PE. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (65 ± 14 years) of whom 14 had high-risk PE (troponin positive in all) and 38 intermediate-risk PE (troponin positive in 91%) were treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin and USAT using 10 mg of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator per device over the course of 15 h. Bilateral USAT was performed in 83% of patients. During 3-month follow-up, two [3.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-13%] patients died (one from cardiogenic shock and one from recurrent PE). Major non-fatal bleeding occurred in two (3.8%; 95% CI, 0.5-13%) patients: one intrathoracic bleeding after cardiopulmonary resuscitation requiring transfusion, one intrapulmonary bleeding requiring lobectomy. Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 37 ± 9 mmHg at baseline to 25 ± 8 mmHg at 15 h (P < 0.001) and cardiac index increased from 2.0 ± 0.7 to 2.7 ± 0.9 L/min/m(2) (P < 0.001). Echocardiographic right-to-left ventricular end-diastolic dimension ratio decreased from 1.42 ± 0.21 at baseline to 1.06 ± 0.23 at 24 h (n = 21; P < 0.001). The greatest haemodynamic benefit from USAT was found in patients with high-risk PE and in those with symptom duration < 14 days. CONCLUSION: A standardized catheter intervention approach using fixed low-dose USAT for the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk PE was associated with rapid improvement in haemodynamic parameters and low rates of bleeding complications and mortality.

Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

Pulmonary embolism remains a common and potentially life-threatening disease. For patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism, catheter-based revascularization therapy has emerged as potential alternative to systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy. Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis is a contemporary catheter-based technique and is the focus of the present review. Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis is more effective in reversing right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in comparison with anticoagulation alone in patients at intermediate risk. However, a direct comparison of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis with systemic thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy is not available. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis with initial intrapulmonary thrombolytic bolus may also be effective in high-risk patients, but evidence from randomized trials is not available. This review summarizes current data on ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism.

[Suspicion of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: update on diagnosis and treatment]. / Quette prise en charge pour une suspicion de thrombose veineuse profonde des membres inférieurs?

Venous thromboembolism is a frequent disease with an annual incidence of 0.75-2.69/1000 reaching 2-7/1000 > 70 years. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are two manifestations of the same underlying disease. Most frequent localization of DVT is at lower limbs. The diagnostic workup begins with an estimation of DVT risk, a judicious use of D-Dimers, and compression venous ultrasound depending on DVT probability. The development of direct oral anticoagulants and recent data on interventional DVT treatment, in selected cases, have widened the therapeutic spectrum of DVT. The present article aims at informing the primary care physician of the optimized workup of patients with lower limb suspicion of DVT.

[Catheter-based treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis]. / Traitement percutané de la thrombose veineuse profonde aiguë.

Nearly half of patients with acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) develop a post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). This risk is particularly high in case of proximal DVT of the common femoral and iliac vein, the major lower limbs venous outflow vessel. Several studies have demonstrated that PTS incidence can be reduced with early vein recanalisation. Currently, catheter-based recanalisation therapies can be offered to selected patients with acute ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis. Aim of the present article is to summarize current knowledge on these catheter-based recanalisation therapies.

[Non atherosclerotic arterial disease of lower limbs]. / Artériopathies non athéromateuses des membres inférieurs.

Non atherogenic peripheral arterial diseases must be taken into consideration whenever lower limb obstructive peripheral disease is diagnosed. This is particularly important in absence of classical cardiovascular risk factors. Management and treatment of these non atherogenic arterial disease are dependant on their causes.

Infrapopliteal lesion morphology in patients with critical limb ischemia: implications for the development of anti-restenosis technologies.

PURPOSE: To angiographically evaluate infrapopliteal arterial lesion morphology in a consecutive series of patients presenting with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty. METHODS: A prospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of CLI patients undergoing endovascular therapy in a tertiary referral center in the year 2011. Morphological assessment of baseline angiograms obtained prior to revascularization included lesion length, assessment of calcification using a semi-quantitative scoring system, and reference vessel diameter (RVD) measurement. Delta RVDs were assessed subtracting distal RVDs from proximal RVDs. A total of 197 infrapopliteal lesions in 105 CLI patients (n=106 limbs) were assessed. Of these, 136 lesions were treated by endovascular means. RESULTS: The average length of treated lesions was 87.1±43.8 mm in stenoses and 124.0±78.3 mm in chronic occlusions (p<0.001). Mean RVD proximal to the lesions was 1.88 mm whereas it was 1.66 mm distal to the lesions (p≤0.03). Mean arterial calcification was 1.15. CONCLUSION: This prospective angiographic series underlines the complex nature and extensive longitudinal involvement of infrapopliteal lesions in CLI patients. These findings should be taken into consideration for anti-restenosis concepts in this challenging subgroup of peripheral artery disease patients.

Sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence microlymphography for detecting lymphedema of the lower extremity.

Fluorescence microlymphography (FML) is used to visualize the lymphatic capillaries. A maximum spread of the fluorescence dye of ≥ 12 mm has been suggested for the diagnosis of lymphedema. However, data on sensitivity and specificity are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of FML for diagnosing lymphedema in patients with leg swelling. Patients with lower extremity swelling were clinically assessed and separated into lymphedema and non-lymphatic edema groups. FML was studied in all affected legs and the maximum spread of lymphatic capillaries was measured. Test accuracy and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess possible threshold values that predict lymphedema. Between March 2008 and August 2011 a total of 171 patients (184 legs) with a median age of 43.5 (IQR 24, 54) years were assessed. Of those, 94 (51.1%) legs were diagnosed with lymphedema. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio and positive and negative predictive value were 87%, 64%, 2.45, 0.20, 72% and 83% for the 12-mm cut-off level and 79%, 83%, 4.72, 0.26, 83% and 79% for the 14-mm cut-off level, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.88). Sensitivity was higher in the secondary versus primary lymphedema (95.0% vs 74.3%, p = 0.045). No major adverse events were observed. In conclusion, FML is a simple and safe technique for detecting lymphedema in patients with leg swelling. A cut-off level of ≥ 14-mm maximum spread has a high sensitivity and high specificity of detecting lymphedema and should be chosen.

Single-center experience in endovascular treatment for infrainguinal bypass obstructions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patency and clinical efficacy of endovascular therapy for infrainguinal bypass obstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were categorized with regard to symptoms (asymptomatic/intermittent claudication [IC] vs critical limb ischemia [CLI]), bypass graft material used (autologous vs prosthetic graft), and localization of distal anastomoses (femoropopliteal vs femorodistal bypass). Primary patency was defined as absence of sonographically verified stenosis greater than 50%. Assisted primary patency was applied to secondary revisions to prevent impending occlusion. Secondary patency refers to repeat interventions aimed at restoring bypass patency after occlusion. Primary sustained clinical improvement in IC was defined as an upward shift of at least one category per Rutherford classification, accordingly to a level of claudication in patients with CLI. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (54 limbs, 12 with CLI) were included. At 1 year, primary patency rates were 74% in IC and 27% in CLI (P = .001), primary assisted patency rates were 85% in IC and 68% in CLI (P = .05), and secondary patency rates were 89% in IC and 100% in CLI (P = .32). Accordingly, primary sustained clinical improvement rates were 64% in IC and 25% in CLI (P = .018). After adjustment for confounding factors, CLI (hazard ratio [HR], 7.8; 95% CI, 2.3-26.32; P = .001) and impaired patent runoff (ie, less than three crural runoff vessels; HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.96; P = .045) were independently associated with impaired primary patency. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular revascularization is a reasonable treatment option to prevent impending bypass occlusion. Presence of CLI and impaired crural runoff are independent risk factors for lower patency rates.

Differences in duration of anticoagulation after pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis: Findings from the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER).

BACKGROUND: Although the two manifestations of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), vary considerably, the consensus guidelines recommend similar algorithms for therapeutic anticoagulation in both conditions. Real-world data assessing contemporary management strategies in PE and DVT alone may help tailoring future recommendations towards more individualized patient care. METHODS: In the present analysis, we compared demographics, comorbidities, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of PE versus DVT only among 2062 consecutive patients with confirmed VTE enrolled by 11 acute care hospitals between November 2012 and February 2015 in the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER). RESULTS: Overall, 1246 (60 %) patients were diagnosed with PE. In comparison to DVT alone, PE patients were older (66 vs. 59 years; p < 0.001), more frequently had acute and chronic comorbidities, less frequently had prior VTE and hormone replacement, and were less often pregnant. VTE was considered similarly often provoked in patients with PE and DVT alone (33.8 % vs. 33.5 %; p = 0.88). Anticoagulation for an indefinite duration was more often prescribed to patients with PE than those with DVT alone (45.7 vs. 19.6 %; p < 0.001), and PE diagnosis was the strongest independent predictor of indefinite anticoagulation (OR 3.21; 95 % CI 2.55-4.06; p < 0.001). Diagnosis of PE was associated with both increased risk of 90-day mortality (HR 2.31, 95 % CI 1.44-3.71; p = 0.001) and major bleeding (HR 3.88, 95 % CI 1.63-9.22; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis affirms differences in demographics, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of PE versus DVT alone. In routine clinical practice, duration of anticoagulation is being managed differently between the two manifestations of VTE, in contrast to recommendations of the current consensus guidelines.

Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Leg edema is a common manifestation of various underlying pathologies. Reliable measurement tools are required to quantify edema and monitor therapeutic interventions. Aim of the present work was to investigate the reproducibility of optoelectronic leg volumetry over 3 weeks' time period and to eliminate daytime related within-individual variability. METHODS: Optoelectronic leg volumetry was performed in 63 hairdressers (mean age 45 ± 16 years, 85.7% female) in standing position twice within a minute for each leg and repeated after 3 weeks. Both lower leg (legBD) and whole limb (limbBF) volumetry were analysed. Reproducibility was expressed as analytical and within-individual coefficients of variance (CVA, CVW), and as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 492 leg volume measurements were analysed. Both legBD and limbBF volumetry were highly reproducible with CVA of 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Within-individual reproducibility of legBD and limbBF volumetry over a three weeks' period was high (CVW 1.3% for both; ICC 0.99 for both). At both visits, the second measurement revealed a significantly higher volume compared to the first measurement with a mean increase of 7.3 ml ± 14.1 (0.33% ± 0.58%) for legBD and 30.1 ml ± 48.5 ml (0.52% ± 0.79%) for limbBF volume. A significant linear correlation between absolute and relative leg volume differences and the difference of exact day time of measurement between the two study visits was found (P < .001). A therefore determined time-correction formula permitted further improvement of CVW. CONCLUSIONS: Leg volume changes can be reliably assessed by optoelectronic leg volumetry at a single time point and over a 3 weeks' time period. However, volumetry results are biased by orthostatic and daytime-related volume changes. The bias for day-time related volume changes can be minimized by a time-correction formula.