Transcriptomic-Based Microenvironment Classification Reveals Precision Medicine Strategies for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The complex tumor microenvironment (TME) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has hindered the development of reliable predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy and immunomodulatory strategies. A comprehensive characterization of the TME is necessary to advance precision therapeutics in PDAC. METHODS: A transcriptomic profiling platform for TME classification based on functional gene signatures was applied to 14 publicly available PDAC datasets (n = 1657) and validated in a clinically annotated independent cohort of patients with PDAC (n = 79). Four distinct subtypes were identified using unsupervised clustering and assessed to evaluate predictive and prognostic utility. RESULTS: TME classification using transcriptomic profiling identified 4 biologically distinct subtypes based on their TME immune composition: immune enriched (IE); immune enriched, fibrotic (IE/F); fibrotic (F); and immune depleted (D). The IE and IE/F subtypes demonstrated a more favorable prognosis and potential for response to immunotherapy compared with the F and D subtypes. Most lung metastases and liver metastases were subtypes IE and D, respectively, indicating the role of clonal phenotype and immune milieu in developing personalized therapeutic strategies. In addition, distinct TMEs with potential therapeutic implications were identified in treatment-naive primary tumors compared with tumors that underwent neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach defines a distinct subgroup of PADC patients that may benefit from immunotherapeutic strategies based on their TME subtype and provides a framework to select patients for prospective clinical trials investigating precision immunotherapy in PDAC. Further, the predictive utility and real-world clinical applicability espoused by this transcriptomic-based TME classification approach will accelerate the advancement of precision medicine in PDAC.

Biliary Adverse Events During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a high-volume experience with biliary drainage before neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for patients with operable pancreatic cancer (PC) and characterize the association between biliary adverse events (BAEs) and patient outcome. BACKGROUND: Patients with PC presenting with biliary obstruction require durable decompression before NAT. METHODS: Patients with operable PC and tumor-associated biliary obstruction were examined and grouped by the presence or absence of a BAE during NAT. The incidence, timing, and management of BAEs are described, and outcomes, including the completion of all treatment and overall survival (OS), were compared. RESULTS: Of 426 patients who received pretreatment biliary decompression, 92 (22%) experienced at least 1 BAE during NAT, and 56 (13%) required repeat intervention on their biliary stent. The median duration of NAT was 161 days for all patients and was not different in the group that experienced BAEs. The median time from initial stent placement to BAE was 64 days. An interruption in the delivery of NAT (median 7 days) occurred in 25 (6%) of 426 patients. Among 426 patients, 290 (68%) completed all NAT, including surgery: 60 (65%) of 92 patients with BAE and 230 (69%) of 334 patients without BAE ( P =0.51). Among 290 patients who completed NAT and surgery, the median OS was 39 months, 26 months for the 60 patients with BAE, and 43 months for the 230 patients without BAE ( P =0.02). CONCLUSIONS: During extended multimodal NAT for PC, 22% of patients experienced a BAE. Although BAEs were not associated with a significant interruption of treatment, patients who experienced a BAE had worse OS.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in the detroit research on cancer survivors (ROCS) cohort.

PURPOSE: Improved life expectancy has increased the likelihood for long-term complications from chemotherapy among cancer survivors. One burdensome complication is chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We evaluated rates of CIPN outcomes in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivorship (ROCS) cohort. METHODS: The population included 1,034 African American (AA) survivors who received chemotherapy for breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer. CIPN prevalence was based on initial occurrence of worsening of self-reported pain, numbness or tingling after chemotherapy. Current CIPN included symptoms still present at the time of the survey, and persistent CIPN symptoms were present 12 or more months post-chemotherapy. CIPN severity was ranked as mild, moderate or severe. Logistic regression was utilized to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the various categories of CIPN. RESULTS: CIPN prevalence was 68%, with 53% current and 52% persistent. The symptom severity distribution based on prevalent CIPN included 32.2% mild, 30.8% moderate, and 36.9% severe. Factors associated with prevalent CIPN (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) included primary cancer site (breast: 3.88, 2.02-7.46); and (colorectal: 5.37, 2.69-10.73), lower risk for older age at diagnosis (0.66, 0.53-0.83) and divorced/separated marital status (2.13, 1.42-3.21). Current CIPN was in addition, associated with more advanced stage disease trend (1.34, 1.08-1.66) and greater number of co-morbid medical conditions trend (1.23, 1.09-1.40), as was persistent CIPN. Severity of prevalent CIPN was associated with history of arthritis (1.55, 1.06-2.26) and severity of persistent CIPN with higher BMI (1.58, 1.07-2.35). CONCLUSIONS: CIPN is a common and persistent complication in AA cancer survivors. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of CIPN predictors in all groups of cancer survivors.

CA19-9 Response to First-Line Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Second-Line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Operable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Response to second-line (2L) neoadjuvant therapy for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) is understudied. This study examined carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response to first-line (1L) and 2L chemotherapy. METHODS: The study identified patients with operable PC and elevated CA19-9 (≥ 35 U/mL with total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) who received 1L FOLFIRINOX (FFX). The patients were restaged after 2 months and based on response, received additional FFX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as part of total neoadjuvant therapy. Response was defined as a decrease in tumor size on computed tomography (CT) imaging or a decline in CA19-9 of 50% or more and preserved performance status. RESULTS: For operable PC with an elevated CA19-9, 108 patients received 1L FFX. After 2 months of chemotherapy, the decision was made to continue FFX (FFX ≥ FFX) for 76 (70%) of the 108 patients and switch to GnP (FFX ≥ GnP)) for 32 (30%) of the patients. Of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients, 27 had no evidence of radiographic or biochemical (CA19-9) response to 1L FFX. Of these 27 patients, 26 (96%) demonstrated a response to 2L GnP. After 4 months of chemotherapy, 62 (82%) of the 76 FFX ≥ FFX patients had a CA19-9 response compared with 31 (97%) of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of biochemical response to 2 months of 1L FFX may identify a subgroup of patients with a very high rate of response to 2L GnP, emphasizing the importance of assessing treatment response at 2-month intervals.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Quality over quantity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with curative intent is unclear. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of both duration of NACT and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) normalization to NACT. METHODS: We examined patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC treated with NACT and chemoradiation. Patients were compared by NACT duration (2 vs. 4 months) and by CA19-9 normalization after NACT. RESULTS: Among 171 patients, 83 (49%) received 2 months of NACT, and 88 (51%) received 4 months. After NACT completion, 115 (67%) patients had persistently elevated CA19-9, and 56 (33%) had normalized. Of the 125 patients who had successful surgery, 73 (58%) had normalized CA19-9 postoperatively. Duration of NACT was not associated with overall survival (OS) while CA19-9 normalization after NACT (regardless of duration) was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.89, p = 0.02). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS among patients without CA19-9 normalization after NACT (HR 0.42, CI 0.20-0.86, p = 0.02) but not among those that normalized, independent of duration. CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 normalization after NACT is a clinically significant endpoint of treatment; patients without CA19-9 normalization may benefit from additional therapy.

Updates and new directions in the use of radiation therapy for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dose, sensitization, and novel technology.

Panc reatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating malignancy. There have been few advances that have substantially improved overall survival in the past several years. On its current trajectory, the deaths from PDAC are expected to cross that from all gastrointestinal cancers combined by 2030. Radiation therapy is a technically very complex modality that bridges multiple different treatment strategies. It represents a hybrid among advanced diagnostic imaging, local (often ablative) intervention, and heterogeneous biological mechanisms contributing to normal and oncologic cell kill. In this article, we bring an overview of the several promising strategies that are currently being investigated to improve outcomes using radiation therapy for patients with PDAC.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Overall survival (OS) for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) is optimized when 4-6 months of nonsurgical therapy is combined with pancreatectomy. Because surgery renders the delivery of postoperative therapy uncertain, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is gaining popularity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with operable PC and compared TNT with shorter course neoadjuvant therapy (SNT). Primary outcomes of interest included completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and resection of the primary tumor, receipt of 5 months of nonsurgical therapy, and median OS. RESULTS: We reviewed 541 consecutive patients from 2009 to 2019 including 226 (42%) with resectable PC and 315 (58%) with borderline resectable (BLR) PC. The median age was 66 years (IQR [59, 72]), and 260 (48%) patients were female. TNT was administered to 89 (16%) patients and SNT was administered to 452 (84%). Both groups were equally likely to complete intended NT and surgery (p = 0.90). Patients who received TNT and surgical resection were more likely to have a complete pathologic response (8% vs 4%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to receive at least 5 months of nonsurgical therapy (67% vs 45%, p < 0.01). The median OS was 26 months [IQR (15, 57)]; not reached among patients treated with TNT, and 25 months [IQR (15, 56)] among patients treated with SNT (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: TNT ensures the delivery of intended systemic therapy prior to a complicated operation without decreasing the chance of successful surgery; a window of operability was not lost. Patients who can tolerate SNT will likely benefit from TNT.

Can aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and other non-invasive markers effectively reduce liver biopsies for renal transplant evaluation of hepatitis C virus-positive patients?

BACKGROUND: Advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis is still regarded as a contraindication for kidney transplantation alone by most centers. The value of aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and other non-invasive markers has been less studied in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease to predict hepatic fibrosis. Can these be used to effectively decrease the number of biopsies done in these patients being evaluated for transplantation? METHODS: Our study population included 255 patients with liver biopsy data. All patient information was collected and reviewed from medical records. The diagnostic accuracy of the predictive models was analyzed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. RESULTS: The variables associated with F3-F4 were aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.007), bilirubin (P ≤ 0.001), platelet count (P = 0.01) and APRI (P ≤ 0.001). The use of any one laboratory abnormality to predict liver biopsy scores did not show high positive predictive values (22.6-72.7%). Having abnormal liver findings or cirrhosis on imaging was associated with high specificities (92.0-97.8%) but low sensitivities (31.4-42.9%). Using APRI levels of ≥0.40 and ≤0.95 as an indication for liver biopsy, 50% of patients with F3-F4 would have correctly avoided having a biopsy. However, 33% of patients with F3-F4 would have been mislabeled and not be indicated for biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there may not currently be a simple and sufficiently accurate non-invasive test to replace liver biopsy in renal transplant workup for HCV-positive patients. The risks outweigh the benefits when it comes to using non-invasive markers like the APRI.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Co-Occurrence of KRAS and EGFR Mutations: Case Report and Literature Review.

Introduction: Mutation in Kristin ras sarcoma virus (KRAS) oncogene is the main driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and is present in nearly 90% of patients with PDAC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is rare in PDAC and is mostly present in the absence of KRAS mutation. Co-occurrence of KRAS and EGFR mutations is extremely rare, and the value of EGFR inhibition in these cases is unknown. Case Presentation: Here, we present a case of metastatic PDAC with co-occurrence of KRAS G12V and EGFR L730R. Despite primary resistance to folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this patient had a biochemical response (decrease in carbohydrate antigen 19-9) and disease control of 7 months on gemcitabine/erlotinib (an EGFR inhibitor). This outcome is remarkable in the late-line PDAC treatment setting and is unusual after the progression of the tumor on gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Conclusion: This case suggests that gemcitabine/erlotinib could be an effective treatment in patients with PDAC and co-occurrence of EGFR and KRAS mutations.

Chemotherapy-free treatment targeting fusions and driver mutations in KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a case series.

Background: KRAS wild-type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a distinct entity with unique biology. The therapeutic impact of matched targeted therapy in these patients in a real-world setting, to date, is less established. Objectives: The aim of our study was to review our institutional database to identify the prevalence of actionable genomic alterations in patients with KRAS-WT tumors and to evaluate the therapeutic impact of matched targeted therapy in these patients. Design: We reviewed electronic medical records of patients with KRAS-WT PDAC and advanced disease (n = 14) who underwent clinical-grade tissue ± liquid next-generation sequencing (315-648 genes for tissue) between years 2015 and 2021. Methods: Demographic and disease characteristics were summarized using descriptive parameters. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 236 PDAC patients, 14 had advanced/metastatic disease with KRAS-WT tumors. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years. There was a high frequency of potentially actionable genomic alterations, including three (21%) with BRAF alterations, two (14%) with fusions [RET-PCM1 and FGFR2-POC1B (N = 1 each)]; and one with a druggable EGFR (EGFR E746_A755delISERD) variant; two other patients had an STK11 and a MUTYH alteration. Five patients were treated with matched targeted therapy, with three having durable benefit: (i) erlotinib for EGFR-altered tumor, followed by osimertinib/capmatinib when MET amplification emerged (first-line therapy); (ii) pralsetinib for RET fusion (fifth line); and (iii) dabrafenib/trametinib for BRAF N486_P490del (third line). Duration of time on chemotherapy-free matched targeted therapy for these patients was 17+, 11, and 18+ months, respectively. Conclusion: Sustained therapeutic benefit can be achieved in a real-world setting in a subset of patients with advanced/metastatic KRAS-WT PDAC treated with chemotherapy-free matched targeted agents. Prospective studies are warranted.

The impact of pre-transplant dialysis on simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus living donor kidney transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant dialysis is known to affect kidney graft survival. Here, we report the impact of pre-transplant dialysis on patient and graft survival of type 1 diabetic recipients of either a simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) or living donor kidney (LDK) transplant. METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database, 6822 adult type 1 diabetic recipients transplanted through 2000-2011 were identified. Patients were categorized based on pre-transplant dialysis time (DT): preemptive recipients (P-LDK, n = 498; P-SPK, n = 1529), recipients with <1 year of DT (0-1 year DT; LDK n = 582, SPK n = 1700), and those with 1-2 years DT (1-2 year DT; LDK n = 301, SPK n = 2212). Seven-year patient and kidney survival were examined. RESULTS: Compared with the P-SPK group, both 0-1 year DT and 1-2 year DT SPK recipients had lower 7-year patient survival (89, 84 & 84% respectively; log-rank P-value versus P-SPK = 0.01 & <0.001). For LDK groups, DT > 1 year was associated with inferior patient survival (7-year survival 76% versus 87% for P-LDK, P-value versus P-LDK = 0.009). Comparing P-LDK to all other SPK groups, there was no significant difference in 7-year patient or kidney survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive transplantation is associated with the highest patient survival in both LDK and SPK. Compared with the P-LDK group, DT > 1 year is associated with lower patient survival among LDK recipients, but there is no difference in survival with dialysis up to 2 years with SPK. These results highlight the differential impact of DT on LDK and SPK transplantation.

Improved survival among sickle cell kidney transplant recipients in the recent era.

BACKGROUND: Studies from older cohorts of kidney recipients have observed that recipients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have lower patient survival compared with age- and race-matched controls. We examined whether survival has improved among SCD recipients in the current era. METHODS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data, all black/African-American kidney recipients were stratified according to transplant year into an early (1988-99) and recent era (2000-11). Patient and allograft survival among SCD recipients and those with other diagnoses were compared (early era: SCD n = 67, others n = 20 694; recent era: SCD n = 106, others n = 34 428). A secondary-matched cohort analysis compared patient and allograft survival between SCD recipients matched to recipients with other diagnoses based on recipient and donor age, gender and donor type (deceased versus living). RESULTS: Patient survival at 6 years was lower among SCD recipients in the early era compared with other diagnoses (55.7 versus 78.0%; P < 0.001). Six-year patient survival among sickle cell recipients improved in the recent era (69.8%; P versus early era = 0.04), although still trended toward lower survival compared with other diagnoses (80.0%; P = 0.07). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models revealed an increased mortality risk with SCD in both eras [early: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.15-4.54; recent: HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.31-3.16]. Patient survival among matched SCD recipients in the recent era was comparable to diabetic recipients (SCD: 73.1%, diabetes: 74.1%; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival has improved among contemporary sickle cell recipients compared with an earlier cohort and is comparable to a matched cohort of diabetic kidney recipients. Appropriately selected SCD patients may receive kidney transplants with reasonable survival outcome.

Comprehensive genomic profiling: Does timing matter?

Purpose: There is variability in utilization of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in most of the metastatic solid tumors (MST). We evaluated the CGP utilization patterns and its impact on outcomes at an academic tertiary center. Patients and Methods: Institutional database was reviewed for CGP data in adult patients with MST between 01/2012 - 04/2020. Patients were categorized based on interval between CGP and metastatic diagnosis; 3 tertiles of distribution (T1-earliest to the diagnosis, T3-furthest), and pre-mets (CGP performed prior to diagnosis of metastasis). Overall survival (OS) was estimated from the time of metastatic diagnosis with left truncation at the time of CGP. Cox regression model was used to estimate the impact of timing of CGP on survival. Results: Among 1,358 patients, 710 were female, 1,109 Caucasian, 186 Afro-Americans, and 36 Hispanic. The common histologies were lung cancer (254; 19%), colorectal cancer (203; 15%), gynecologic cancers (121; 8.9%), and pancreatic cancer (106; 7.8%). Time interval between diagnosis of metastatic disease and CGP was not statistically significantly different based on sex, race and ethnicity after adjusting for histologic diagnoses with 2 exceptions - Hispanics with lung cancer had delayed CGP compared to non-Hispanics (p =0.019) and females with pancreas cancer had delayed CGP compared to males (p =0.025). Lung cancer, gastro-esophageal cancer and gynecologic malignancies had better survival if they had CGP performed during the first tertile after metastatic diagnosis. Conclusion: CGP utilization across cancer types was equitable irrespective of sex, race and ethnicity. Early CGP after metastatic diagnosis might have effect on treatment delivery and clinical outcomes in cancer type with more actionable targets.

Targeting Cellular Metabolism With CPI-613 Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Local tumor progression is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with surgically unresectable disease. Novel and effective approaches to accomplish durable local control are urgently needed. We tested whether CPI-613 (devimistat), a first-in-class investigational small molecule inhibitor of mitochondrial metabolism, was capable of altering cancer cell energy metabolism and sensitizing PDAC cells to radiation therapy (RT). Methods and Materials: The effect of a combined treatment of RT with CPI-613 on the viability of, clonogenic potential of, and cell death induction in PDAC cells (MiaPaCa-2 and Panc-1) was determined using a trypan blue dye exclusion assay, a colony formation assay, and a 7-amino-actinomycin D assay, respectively. The synergistic effects of CPI-613-RT and chemotherapeutic agents (gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil) were measured in MiaPaCa-2 cells using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and spheroid formation assay. Changes in energy metabolism were determined by profiling metabolites treated with either RT, CPI-613, or both using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results: This study demonstrates that a combination of single-fraction RT (2 and 10 Gy) with CPI-613 significantly inhibits PDAC cell growth compared with RT alone. Molecular analysis revealed inhibition of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase at the protein level. In addition, we demonstrate enhanced cell death of PDAC cells when treated with RT-CPI-613 combination. Targeted metabolomic analysis on PDAC cells post-CPI-613-RT treatment revealed alterations in key mitochondrial metabolites, with broader target engagement by the combination treatment, indicating the sensitization of CPI-613-treated PDAC cells to RT. Furthermore, a combination treatment of CPI-613 with either gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil in the presence of 2 Gy RT synergistically inhibits PDAC cell proliferation. Conclusions: Our results support a novel combination of CPI-613-RT that warrants further preclinical and early-phase clinical investigations. A phase 1 trial designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose of CPI-613 in combination with chemo-RT in patients with PDAC was recently initiated (NCT05325281).

Characterization of an oligometastatic state in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Most patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will present with distant metastatic disease at diagnosis. We sought to identify clinical characteristics associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with metastatic PDAC. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients presenting with metastatic PDAC that received treatment at our institution with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based chemotherapies between August 1, 2011 and September 1, 2017 were included in the study. Metastatic disease burden was comprehensively characterized radiologically via individual diagnostic imaging segmentation. Landmark analysis was performed at 18 months, and survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups via the log-rank test. ECOG and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: 121 patients were included with a median age of 62 years (37-86), 40% were female, 25% had ECOG 0 at presentation. Of the 121 patients included, 33% (n = 41) were alive at 12 months and 25% (n = 31) were alive at 18 months. Landmark analysis demonstrated a significant difference between patients surviving <18 months and ≥18 months regarding the presence of lung only metastases (36% vs. 16%, p = 0.04), number of organs with metastases (≥2 vs. 1, p = 0.04), and disease volume (mean of 19.1 cc vs. 1.4 cc, p = 0.04). At Year 1, predictors for improved OS included ECOG status at diagnosis (ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1, p = 0.04), metastatic disease volume at diagnosis (≤0.1 cc vs. >60 cc, p = 0.004), metastasis only in the liver (p = 0.04), and normalization of CA 19-9 (p < 0.001). At Year 2, the only predictor of improved OS was normalization of the CA 19-9 (p = 0.03). In those patients that normalized their CA 19-9, median overall survival was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis normalization of CA-19-9 or volumetric metastatic disease burden less than 0.2 cc demonstrated a remarkable OS, similar to that of patients with non-metastatic disease. These metrics are useful for counseling patients and identifying cohorts that may be optimal for trials exploring metastatic and/or local tumor-directed interventions.

Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by nonspecific presenting symptoms, lack of a screening test, rapidly progressive clinical course, and presentation with an advanced-stage disease in the majority of patients. PDAC is essentially a systemic disease irrespective of the initial stage, as most patients with non-metastatic PDAC undergoing curative-intent treatment eventually experience metastatic relapse. Currently, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment in patients with advanced disease. However, the current standard treatment with multiagent chemotherapy has modest efficacy and results in median overall survival (OS) of less than a year and a 5-year OS of about 10%. The pathobiology of PDAC poses many challenges, including a unique tumor microenvironment interfering with drug delivery, intratumoral heterogeneity, and a strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment that supports cancer growth. Recent research is exploring a wide range of novel therapeutic targets, including genomic alterations, tumor microenvironment, and tumor metabolism. The rapid evolution of tumor genome sequencing technologies paves the way for personalized, targeted therapies. The present review summarizes the current chemotherapeutic treatment paradigm of advanced PDAC and discusses the evolving novel targets that are being investigated in a myriad of clinical trials.

Evolution of Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by early systemic dissemination, a complex tumor microenvironment, as well as significant intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity. Treatment options and survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have improved steadily over the last 3 decades. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, evolving therapeutic strategies are aimed at targeting the tumor microenvironment, metabolism, and the tumor-host immune balance.