Substrate Modification for Atrial Fibrillation Induced by Mechanical Irritation That May Be Associated With Non-Pulmonary Vein Foci.

The importance of treating non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci is increasing with improvements in the durability of PV isolation. We describe two cases wherein non-PV foci were induced by mechanical irritation and conventional induction in the same area, which was impossible to induce after ablation, suggesting a relationship between mechanical irritation and induction of non-PV foci. In a recurrent case of non-PV foci, atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced only by mechanical irritation. No recurrence has been observed since the ablation of the area. Thus, treatment of the AF induction site with mechanical irritation could be considered an effective therapy for non-PV foci.

A validation study of the accuracy of the atrial pace map assessed with intracardiac pattern matching: Potential utility of non-pulmonary vein mapping.

BACKGROUND: Identification of infrequent nonpulmonary vein trigger premature atrial contractions (PACs) is challenging. We hypothesized that pace mapping (PM) assessed by correlation scores calculated by an intracardiac pattern matching (ICPM) module was useful for locating PAC origins, and conducted a validation study to assess the accuracy of ICPM-guided PM. METHODS: Analyzed were 30 patients with atrial fibrillation. After pulmonary vein isolation, atrial pacing was performed at one or two of four sites on the anterior and posterior aspects of the left atrium (LA, n = 10/10), LA septum (n = 10), and lateral RA (n = 10), which was arbitrarily determined as PAC. The intracardiac activation obtained from each pacing was set as an ICPM reference consisting of six CS unipolar electrograms (CS group) or six CS unipolar electrograms and four RA electrograms (CS-RA group). RESULTS: The PM was performed at 193 ± 107 sites for each reference pacing site. All reference pacing sites corresponded to sites where the maximal ICPM correlation score was obtained. Sites with a correlation score ≥98% were rarely obtained in the CS-RA than CS group (33% vs. 55%, P = .04), but those ≥95% were similarly obtained between the two groups (93% vs. 88%, P = .71), and those ≥90% were obtained in all. The surface areas with correlation scores ≥98% (0[0,10] vs. 10[0,35] mm2, P = .02), ≥95% (10[10,30] vs. 50[10,180] mm2, P = .002) and ≥90% (60[30,100] vs. 170[100,560] mm2, P = .0002) were smaller in the CS-RA than CS group. CONCLUSIONS: ICPM-guided PM was useful for identifying the reference pacing sites. Combined use of RA and CS electrograms may improve the mapping quality.

Factors predicting the progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation despite an index catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite undergoing an index ablation, some patients progress from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) to persistent AF (PersAF), and the mechanism behind this is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of progression to PersAF after catheter ablation in patients with PAF. METHODS: This study included 400 PAF patients who underwent an index ablation between 2015 and 2019. The patients were classified into three groups based on their outcomes: Group 1 (PAF to sinus rhythm, n = 226), Group 2 (PAF to PAF, n = 146), and Group 3 (PAF to PersAF, n = 28). Baseline and procedural characteristics were collected, and predictors for AF recurrence and progression were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58.4 ± 11.1 years, with 272 males. After 3 years of follow-up, 7% of the PAF cases recurred and progressed to PersAF despite undergoing an index catheter ablation. In the multivariable analysis, a larger left atrial (LA) diameter and the presence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers during the index procedure independently predicted recurrence. Moreover, a larger LA diameter, the presence of non-PV triggers, and a history of thyroid disease independently predicted AF progression. CONCLUSION: The progression from PAF to PersAF after catheter ablation is associated with a larger LA diameter, history of thyroid disease, and the presence of non-PV triggers. Meticulous preprocedural evaluation, patient selection, and comprehensive provocation tests during catheter ablation are recommended.

Catheter ablation approach and outcome in HIV+ patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Earlier studies have shown a clear association between severity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and incident atrial fibrillation (AF). We present the long-term outcome of catheter ablation (CA) and electrophysiological characteristics in HIV+ AF patients. METHODS: This study evaluated 1438 consecutive AF patients [31 (2.15%) with HIV and 1407 (97.8%) without HIV diagnosis] undergoing their first CA at our center. A total of 31 HIV patients and 31 controls were generated by propensity matching, based on calculated risk factor scores, using a logistic model. During first procedure, all received isolation of pulmonary vein (PV) + posterior wall and superior vena cava. Non-PV triggers, defined as ectopic triggers originating from sites other than PVs, were identified at the redo ablation with high-dose isoproterenol challenge. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were not different between the groups. When compared to the control, by the end of 5 years after the first procedure, recurrence was significantly greater in HIV group [100% vs. 54%, p < .001]. Among patients that underwent redo ablation non-PV triggers were higher in HIV group [93.5% vs. 54%, p < .001], and most frequently originated from the coronary sinus [67.7% vs. 45.2%, p < .001] and left atrial appendage [41.9% vs. 25.8%, p < .001]. After focal ablation of non-PV trigger, no difference in arrhythmia recurrence between two groups [80.6% vs. 87.1%, p = .753] at 1-year follow up was found. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that non-PV triggers are highly prevalent in HIV+ AF patients resulting in higher rate of the mid- and long-term arrhythmia recurrence.

Predictors of pulmonary vein non-reconnection in the second procedure after ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation and its impact on the outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Although first-pass isolation (FPI) of the pulmonary vein (PV) has been suggested as a marker for PV isolation (PVI) durability, it has not been confirmed. Non-PV atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers were the main target in patients without PV reconnection in the second ablation procedure, but the outcome was unclear. We aimed to validate FPI as a marker of PVI durability and evaluate the outcome after the second procedure in patients without PV reconnection by comparing it to those with reconnection. METHODS: Among the 2087 patients undergoing the first ablation index-guided radiofrequency AF ablation, 309 with atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) recurrence and undergoing the second procedure were studied. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the patients without PV reconnection (PV non-reconnection group, n = 142) and with reconnection (PV reconnection group, n = 167). RESULTS: FPI in both PV sides in the first ablation procedure was significantly more frequent in the PV non-reconnection group (77.5%) than in the PV reconnection group (45.5%) (p < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that FPI (odds ratio, 3.71 [95% confidence interval, 2.23-6.19], p < .001) was the only predictor of PV non-reconnection. Radiofrequency applications for non-PV AF triggers were more frequently performed in the PV non-reconnection group (40.8% vs. 24.6%, respectively, p < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AT recurrence-free rate was significantly lower in the PV non-reconnection group (1-year recurrence-free rate, 62.7% vs. 75.4%, respectively; p = .01 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: FPI was the only independent predictor of PV non-reconnection. Despite aggressive ablation for non-PV triggers, AT recurrence was more frequent in patients with PV non-reconnection.

Treatment of pathophysiologic propagation outside of the pulmonary veins in retreatment of atrial fibrillation patients: RECOVER AF study.

AIMS: RECOVER AF evaluated the performance of whole-chamber non-contact charge-density mapping to guide the ablation of non-pulmonary vein (PV) targets in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients following either a first or second failed procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: RECOVER AF was a prospective, non-randomized trial that enrolled patients scheduled for a first or second ablation retreatment for recurrent AF. The PVs were assessed and re-isolated if necessary. The AF maps were used to guide the ablation of non-PV targets through elimination of pathologic conduction patterns (PCPs). Primary endpoint was freedom from AF on or off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 12 months. Patients undergoing retreatment with the AcQMap System (n = 103) were 76% AF-free at 12 months [67% after single procedure (SP)] on or off AADs (80% free from AF on AADs). Patients who had only received a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) prior to study treatment of non-PV targets with the AcQMap System were 91% AF-free at 12 months (83% SP). No major adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Non-contact mapping can be used to target and guide the ablation of PCPs beyond the PVs in persistent AF patients returning for a first or second retreatment with 76% freedom from AF at 12 months. The AF freedom was particularly high, 91% (43/47), for patients enrolled having only a prior de novo PVI, and freedom from all atrial arrhythmias for this cohort was 74% (35/47). These early results are encouraging and suggest that guiding individualized targeted ablation of PCPs may therefore be advantageous to target at the earliest opportunity in patients with persistent AF.

Tall P-waves in inferior leads: A case of coexisting ectopic rhythm and atrial fibrillation arising from the superior vena cava.

Suppression of atrial fibrillation (AF) arising within the superior vena cava (SVC) requires SVC electric isolation (SVCI) without sinus node (SN) injury. If an ectopic rhythm and AF trigger coexist within the SVC, the intra-SVC ectopic rhythm complicates the pre-SVCI search for the SN. This coexistence is without precedent; however, it is important to carefully locate the SN to prevent injury during SVCI. This case shows a paroxysmal AF with both phenomena coexisting in the SVC. Moreover, outpatient electrocardiographic assessment for tall P-waves in inferior leads before catheter ablation could predict these phenomena and enable safer SVCI.

10-Year Outcomes of Patients With Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is commonly performed in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but because very long-term follow-up results of RFCA are limited, we investigated the 10-year RFCA outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF.Methods and Results: We retrospectively enrolled 100 patients (89 men, mean age 53.5±8.4years) with drug-refractory symptomatic non-paroxysmal AF who underwent 3D electroanatomic-guided RFCA. Procedural characteristics at index procedures and clinical outcomes were investigated. In the index procedures, all patients had pulmonary vein isolation, 56 (56.0%), 48 (48.0%), and 32 (32.0%) underwent additional linear, complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and non-pulmonary vein (NPV) foci ablations, respectively. After 124.1±31.7 months, 16 (16%) patients remained in sinus rhythm after just 1 procedure (3 with antiarrhythmic drugs [AAD]) and after multiple (2.1±1.3) procedures in 53 (53.0%) patients (22 with AAD). Left atrial (LA) diameter (hazard ratio HR 1.061; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.020 to 1.103; P=0.003), presence of NPV triggers (HR 1.634; 95% CI 1.019 to 2.623; P=0.042) and undergoing CFAE ablation (HR 2.003; 95% CI 1.262 to 3.180; P=0.003) in the index procedure were independent predictors for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year outcomes of single RFCA in non-paroxysmal AF were unsatisfactory. Enlarged LA, presence of NPV triggers, and undergoing CFAE ablation in the index procedure independently predicted single-procedure recurrence. Multiple procedures are required to achieve adequate rhythm control.

Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi in patients with adenosine triphosphate-induced atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation.

Intravenous ATP may induce atrial fibrillation (AF). ATP shares similar receptor-effector coupling systems with acetylcholine. However, the association between an ATP injection and the hyperactivity of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system, known as ganglionated plexi (GPs), is not well understood. We describe a series of patients with non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger sites provoked by an ATP injection, and assess the feasibility of a ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation. We retrospectively analyzed 547 patients (69% male; mean age 67.4 ± 10.4 years; 38.5% non-paroxysmal AF) who underwent a total of 604 ablation procedures. Intravenous ATP was administered with an isoproterenol infusion during sinus rhythm after a pulmonary vein isolation in 21.3%, Box isolation in 78.6%, and SVC isolation in 52.0% of the procedures, respectively. We reviewed the incidence, the distribution of the foci, and the ablation outcomes in patients with ATP-induced AF. A total of seven patients (1.3%) had ATP-induced AF. Foci were identified in the coronary sinus (CS) in six patients, right atrial posterior wall (RAPW) adjacent to the interatrial groove in two, mitral annulus in two, ligament of Marshall in one, right septum below the foramen ovale in one and left atrial posterior wall in one, respectively. Among these trigger foci, we confirmed the vagal response by high-frequency stimulation in the CS and RAPW in six and two patients, respectively. After a median RF time of 2.9 min (range 2.5-11.3) targeting these foci, in five of six patients who received a repeat ATP injection, the AF became non-inducible. ATP-provoked trigger foci were distributed among certain sites that overlapped with the distribution of the GPs. The GP ablation was effective for this rare, but challenging situation.

Impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time on non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers are a major cause of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence after catheter ablation. However, the effect of the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) on non-PV triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study evaluated 502 consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent initial ablation. We compared 408 patients whose DAT was <3 years with 94 patients whose DAT was ≥3 years. Following PV and posterior wall isolation, 193 non-PV triggers, including 50 AFs, 30 atrial tachycardias (ATs), and 113 repetitive atrial premature beats, were elicited and ablated in 137 (27%) patients. Specifically, 80 non-PV AF/AT triggers were provoked in 64 (13%) patients, being identified more frequently in the DAT ≥ 3 years group than in the DAT < 3 years group (20% vs. 11%, p = .025) especially with a higher prevalence of coronary sinus/inferior left atrial triggers. During a median follow-up of 770 days, the ATA recurrence-free rate was higher in the DAT < 3 years group than the DAT ≥ 3 years group (79% vs. 53% at 2 years, p < .001). In a multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio: 2.70, p = .002) and a longer DAT (odds ratio: 1.13/year, p = .008) were predictors of non-PV AF/AT triggers, and a longer DAT (hazard ratio: 1.12/year, p < .001) and non-PV AT/AF triggers (hazard ratio: 1.79, p = .009) were associated with ATA recurrence. CONCLUSION: Early ablation after the first diagnosis of persistent AF may reduce emerging non-PV AF/AT triggers and ATA recurrence.

The effect of posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation on recurrent arrhythmia.

INTRODUCTION: It is important to consider recurrent arrhythmia after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) for planning an ablation strategy. However, the studies are limited to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus posterior wall isolation (PWI), which were reported to improve procedural outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of PWI on recurrent arrhythmia. METHODS: This is an observational study on patients with persistent AF comparing PVI plus PWI and PVI only strategies. In PVI plus PWI group, linear ablation of the left atrium roofline and bottom line were performed to achieve PWI after PVI. Some patients with AF recurrence underwent the second procedure. The presence of recurrent arrhythmia and results of the second procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients (mean age, 66.9 ± 10.2 years; male, 76.8%) were included. PVI plus PWI group and PVI only group consisted of 90 and 91 patients, respectively. AF recurrence was observed in 28 of 90 (31.1%) patients with PVI plus PWI and in 43 of 91 (47.3%) with PVI only, and log-rank test did not show any significant difference (p = .35). The occurrence of recurrent persistent AF was significantly lower in PVI plus PWI group than in PVI only group (5/90; 5.6% vs. 18/91; 20.9%, p = .002). There was no significant difference between the two groups in recurrent paroxysmal AF and atrial tachycardia (AT). CONCLUSION: PWI, in addition to PVI, for persistent AF was significantly related to fewer episodes of recurrent persistent AF, and it did not increase recurrent AT.

Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation: results from a prospective, multicentre, observational registry.

AIMS: We evaluated the efficacy of an ablation strategy empirically targeting pulmonary veins (PVs) and posterior wall (PW) and the prevalence and clinical impact of extrapulmonary trigger inducibility and ablation in a large cohort of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1803 PerAF patients were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) extended to the entire PW. A standardized protocol was performed to confirm persistent PVAI and elicit any triggers originating from non-PV sites. All non-PV triggers initiating sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias were ablated. Ablation of non-PV sites triggering non-sustained runs (<30 s) of atrial tachyarrhythmias or promoting frequent premature atrial complexes (≥10/min) was left to operator's discretion. Overall, 1319 (73.2%) patients had documented triggers from non-PV areas. After 17.4 ± 8.5 months of follow-up, the cumulative freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias among patients without inducible non-PV triggers (n = 484) was 70.2%. Patients with ablation of induced non-PV triggers had a significantly higher arrhythmia control than those whose triggers were not ablated (67.9% vs. 39.4%, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjusting for clinically relevant variables, patients in whom non-PV triggers were documented but not ablated had an increased risk of arrhythmia relapse (hazard ratio: 2.39; 95% confidence interval: 2.01-2.83; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation extended to the entire PW might provide acceptable long-term arrhythmia-free survival in PerAF patients without inducible non-PV triggers. In our population of PerAF patients, non-PV triggers could be elicited in ∼70% of PerAF patients and their elimination significantly improved outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation lasting less than 2 years.

INTRODUCTION: Outcome data after catheter ablation (CA) for longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) lasting less than 2 years are limited and highly variable with different ablation approaches. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes in patients with LSPAF lasting less than 2 years undergoing extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) versus those with additional non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective analysis, 381 consecutive patients with LSPAF lasting less than 2 years (age: 64 ± 9 years, 76% male, atrial fibrillation duration: 19 ± 5 months) undergoing their first CA were classified into two groups: Group 1 (n = 104) received PVAI extended to PW plus isolation of superior vena cava (SVC) and Group 2 ( n = 277) received PVAI + PW + SVC + non-PV-trigger ablation. All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years. In case of recurrence, repeat procedure was offered and non-PV triggers were targeted for ablation in all. After a single procedure, 26 (25%) patients in Group 1 and 172 (62.1%) in Group 2 remained arrhythmia-free (P < 0.001). A second procedure was performed in 58 of 78 (74.4%) patients in Group 1 and 77 of 105 (73.3%) patients in Group 2. Non-PV triggers were identified in 52 (89.6%) and 54 (70.1%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, and targeted for ablation. Overall, 72 (69.2%) patients in Group 1 and 238 (86%) in Group 2 remained arrhythmia-free ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with LSPAF lasting less than 2 years, extended PVAI plus SVC isolation was less likely to achieve long-term sinus rhythm. In the majority of patients, recurrence was due to non-PV triggers and ablation of those resulted in better outcome.

Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping for non-pulmonary vein foci in a patient with complete situs inversus and dextrocardia.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) having congenital anatomical abnormalities, such as complete situs inversus and dextrocardia, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation can be performed safety using a three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system. However, it is not clear whether a three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system can be used to detect non-PV ectopic beats initiating AF in patients with complete situs inversus and dextrocardia. Here, we report a 21-year-old man with complete situs inversus and dextrocardia, who showed AF caused by non-PV ectopic beats. We successfully detected the origin of the triggered activity from the non-PV foci using three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping.

The usefulness of ventricular pacing during atrial fibrillation ablation in a persistent left superior vena cava: A case report.

A 69-year-old woman with palpitations was referred to our hospital for a second session of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. She had a history of AF ablation including pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) isolation. Electrophysiologic studies showed the veno-atrial connections that had recovered. After PV isolation was performed, AF was induced by atrial premature contraction (APC) from the PLSVC, and AF storm occurred. During PLSVC isolation, AF was not induced by APC from the PLSVC. PLSVC isolation continued during sinus rhythm. The elimination of the PLSVC potential was difficult to confirm because of the far-field potential of the left ventricle. Then, we performed right ventricular pacing. The remaining PLSVC potential was identified. After that, the PLSVC isolation was successful during right ventricular pacing. Complications were not observed. The patient had no recurrence of AF thereafter.

Long-term follow-up of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and severe left atrial scarring: comparison between pulmonary vein antrum isolation only or pulmonary vein isolation combined with either scar homogenization or trigger ablation.

AIMS: Left atrial (LA) scarring, a consequence of cardiac fibrosis is a powerful predictor of procedure-outcome in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation. We sought to compare the long-term outcome in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and severe LA scarring identified by 3D mapping, undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) only or PVAI and the entire scar areas (scar homogenization) or PVAI+ ablation of the non-PV triggers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Totally, 177 consecutive patients with PAF and severe LA scarring were included. Patients underwent PVAI only (n = 45, Group 1), PVAI+ scar homogenization (n = 66, Group 2) or PVAI+ ablation of non-PV triggers (n = 66, Group 3) based on operator's choice. Baseline characteristics were similar across the groups. After first procedure, all patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The success rate at the end of the follow-up was 18% (8 pts), 21% (14 pts), and 61% (40 pts) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cumulative probability of AF-free survival was significantly higher in Group 3 (overall log-rank P <0.01, pairwise comparison 1 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 3 P < 0.01). During repeat procedures, non-PV triggers were ablated in all. After average 1.5 procedures, the success rates were 28 (62%), 41 (62%), and 56 (85%) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (log-rank P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PAF and severe LA scarring, PVAI+ ablation of non-PV triggers is associated with significantly better long-term outcome than PVAI alone or PVAI+ scar homogenization.

Sinus node injury during adjunctive superior vena cava isolation in a patient with triggered atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained heart arrhythmia. Premature beats arising from foci other than pulmonary veins have been related to its pathogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 64-year-old female underwent superior vena cava (SVC) isolation after triggers were identified originating from the SVC following pulmonary vein isolation; immediately after SVC isolation, she developed junctional rhythm with symptomatic hypotension requiring emergent management. Apical motion abnormalities were noticed in the echocardiography suggesting stress-induced cardiomyopathy which resolved 48 hours later. Although received a dual chamber pacemaker, intact sinus node function returned 2 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Superior vena cava isolation in those with trigger mediated atrial fibrillation following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is performed to enhance long-term outcomes. Sinus node injury has been related previously to this procedure. We present the first case of time course of recovery of sinus node function, injured during SVC isolation.