RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that microscopically positive (R1) margins in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may represent a surrogate for aggressive cancer biology rather than technical failure during surgery. However, whether detectable biological differences exist between CRC with R0 and R1 margins is unknown. We sought to investigate whether mismatch repair (MMR) status differs between Stage III CRC with R0 or R1 margins. METHODS: Patients treated for Stage III CRC from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 were identified by using the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Patients were stratified according to MMR status (proficient [pMMR] vs. deficient [dMMR]) and margin status. Outcomes of interest included the R1 rate according to MMR and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 3636 patients were included, of whom 473 (13.0%) had dMMR colorectal cancers. Patients with dMMR cancers were more likely to be elderly, female, and have right-sided cancers. R1 margins were significantly more common in patients with dMMR cancers (20.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), with the greatest difference seen in the rate of R1 margins related to the primary tumour (8.9% vs. 4.7%) rather than to lymph node metastases (11.6% vs. 10.5%). This association was seen in both right- and left-sided cancers. On multivariable analyses, R1 margins, but not MMR status, were associated with poorer survival, alongside age, pN stage, perineural invasion, and extramural venous invasion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Stage III CRC, dMMR status is associated with increased risks of R1 margins following potentially curative surgery, supporting the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this patient group.
RESUMO
Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated restrictions have resulted in delayed diagnoses across various tumor entities, including rectal cancer. Our hypothesis was based on the expectation of a reduced number of primary operations due to higher tumor stages compared to the control group. Methods: In a single-center retrospective study conducted from 1 March 2018 to 1 March 2022, we analyzed 120 patients with an initial diagnosis of rectal cancer. Among them, 65 patients were part of the control group (pre-COVID-19), while 55 patients were included in the study group (during the COVID-19 pandemic). We compared tumor stages, treatment methods, and complications, presenting data as absolute numbers or mean values. Results: Fewer primary tumor resections during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.010), as well as a significantly lower overall number of tumor resections (p = 0.025) were seen compared to the control group. Twenty percent of patients in the COVID-19 group received their diagnosis during lockdown periods. These patients presented significantly higher tumor stages (T4b: 27.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.025) compared to the control group prior to the pandemic. In addition, more patients with angiolymphatic invasion (ALI) were identified in the COVID-19 group following neoadjuvant treatment compared to the control group (p = 0.027). No differences were noted between the groups regarding complications, stoma placement, or conversion rates. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic, particularly during lockdown, appears to have contributed to delayed diagnoses, resulting in higher tumor stages and a decreased number of surgeries. The quality of rectal cancer treatment can be maintained under pandemic conditions.
RESUMO
(1) Background: In our study, we aimed to determine the accuracy rates of imaging methods for sigmoid, rectosigmoid colon, and rectum cancer. (2) Methods: Patients with tumors located in the rectosigmoid colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum who were operated on were included. Upon admission, we examined the patients' first diagnostic colonoscopies and their preoperative repeat control colonoscopies and computed tomography (CT) report. (3) Results: In this study, 23 patients (57.5%) were male. The overall accuracy rates were 80.0% (32/40) in colonoscopy, 65.0% (26/40) in preoperative CT, and 87.5% (35/40) in retro CT, and the differences among the examination methods were statistically significant (p = 0.049). The sensitivity levels decreased to 50.0% for colonoscopy and preoperative CT and 75.0% for retro CT in rectosigmoid colon tumors. In rectal tumors, the sensitivity levels were 75.0% in colonoscopy, 60.0% in preoperative CT, and 80.0% in retro CT. In two patients, the tumor location was given incorrectly, and postoperative pathological evaluations indicated T3N0 tumors; the initially planned treatment was thus changed to include radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy in the postoperative period because the tumor was located in the middle rectum. (4) Conclusions: Accuracy in tumor localization in sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum tumors still needs to be improved, which could be accomplished with prospective studies. CT evaluations for cancer localization in this patient group should be re-evaluated by a radiologist.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer often requires neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) before surgical intervention. This study aimed to assess the concordance between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and postoperative pathology results after NAT in rectal cancer patients. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 52 patients who underwent NAT and subsequent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between May 2019 and May 2023 was conducted. Demographics, preoperative MRIs, time intervals between NAT, MRI, and surgery, and postoperative pathology were assessed. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 59 years, with a male predominance (76.9%). Tumour T stage (κ = 0.157), lymph node stage (κ = 0.138), and circumferential resection margin (κ = 0.138) concordance showed poor agreement between post-neoadjuvant treatment (PNT) MRI and pathology. PNT MRI demonstrated a limited correlation with postoperative pathology. CONCLUSIONS: While preoperative MRI is commonly used for restaging after NAT in rectal cancer, our study highlights its limited concordance with postoperative pathology. The sensitivity and specificity metrics, although reported in the literature, should be interpreted alongside concordance assessments for a comprehensive evaluation.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Masculino , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , AdultoRESUMO
In magnetic resonance- (MR-) based adaptive workflows for an MR-linac, the treatment plan is optimized and recalculated online using the daily MR images. The Unity MR-linac is supplied with a patient positioning device (ppd) using pelvic and abdomen thermoplastic masks attached to a board with high-density components. This study highlights the dosimetric effect of using this in such workflows when there are relative patient-ppd displacements, as these are not visualized on MR imaging and the treatment planning system assumes the patient is fixed relative to the ppd. The online adapted plans of two example rectum cancer patients treated at a Unity MR-linac were perturbed by introducing relative patient-ppd displacements, and the effect was evaluated on plan dosimetry. Forty-eight perturbed clinical adapted plans were recalculated, based on online MR-based synthetic computed tomography, and compared with the original plans, using dose-volume histogram parameters and gamma analysis. The target volume covered by the prescribed dose ( D pre ) and by at least 107% of D pre varied up to - 1.87% and + 3.67%, respectively for 0.5 cm displacements, and to - 3.18% and + 4.96% for 2 cm displacements; whilst 2%-2 mm gamma analysis showed a median value of 92.9%. The use of a patient positioning system with high-density components in a Unity MR-based online adaptive treatment workflow can introduce unrecognized errors in plan dosimetry and it is recommended not to use such a device for such treatments, without modifying the device and the workflow, followed by careful clinical evaluation, or alternatively to use other immobilization methods.
Assuntos
Aceleradores de Partículas , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Humanos , Fluxo de Trabalho , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radiometria , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodosRESUMO
Background/purpose: Although oral health and systemic diseases are closely associated, little is known about the utilization of ambulatory dental visits in patients prior to diagnosis of colon-rectum cancer (CRC). In this study, a nested case-control study based on the population-based health claim database was conducted to clarify the relationship between dental visits and CRC in Taiwan. Materials and methods: From the Longitudinal Health Insurance Research Database 2010 (LHIRD 2010), we identified 4787 patients who were newly diagnosed with CRC from 2005 to 2013. We also recruited 19,148 control subjects matched in a 1:4 ratio based on sex and age at the index date from LHIRD 2010. Both groups were retrospectively traced back to 1997 to obtain any records of ambulatory dental visits that occurred within 8 years prior to the index date. ICD-9 codes 520-529 for diseases of oral cavity, salivary glands, and jaw were defined as dental visits. Results: The mean frequency of dental visits within 8 years prior to index date among patients with CRC were significantly higher than the control group (P = 0.005). Patients with CRC had significantly higher proportions of certain co-morbidities than control group. However, periodontal treatment, caries filling, and tooth extraction were borderline and not significantly related to CRC after adjustment. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the utilization of ambulatory dental visits is significantly increased in patients with CRC prior to its diagnosis. Certain co-morbidities may also affect the frequency of dental visits and the occurrence of CRC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer death in the world and is estimated to have been responsible for almost 935,000 deaths during 2020. OBJECTIVE: Describe clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC patients under 30 years. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients under 30 years diagnosed with CRC. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 1823 patients were diagnosed with CRC, of which 54 (2.96%) were under 30 years. The OS, during 4 years, was 41.5%. The clinical stage found IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), giving neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 0.705; 95% CI: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) and no medical history of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.925; 95% CI: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) are independent predictors of mortality. The PFS, during 4 years, was 21.3%. Clinical stage IV (HR: 2.418; 95% CI: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050), and no diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.800; 95% CI: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) are independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients are usually diagnosed with CRC in advanced stages. Early symptoms and evaluation, irrespective of age, are crucial.
ANTECEDENTES: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en el mundo y se estima que fue responsable de casi 935,000 muertes durante el año 2020. OBJETIVO: Describir las características clinicopatológicas, la supervivencia global (SG) y la supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP) en pacientes con CCR menores de 30 años. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en pacientes con diagnóstico de CCR menores de 30 años. RESULTADOS: Entre 2017 y 2021 se diagnosticaron 1823 pacientes con CCR, de los cuales 54 (2.96%) eran menores de 30 años. La SG a 4 años fue del 41.5%. Se encontró que la etapa clínica IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), recibir tratamiento neoadyuvante (HR: 0.705; IC95%: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) y no tener antecedente de síndrome de Lynch (HR:3.925; IC95%: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) son predictores de mortalidad independientes. La SLP a 4 años fue del 21.3%. La etapa clínica IV (HR: 2.418; IC95%: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050) y el no contar con diagnóstico de síndrome de Lynch (HR: 3.800; IC95%: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) son predictores independientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes jóvenes son diagnosticados con CCR en etapas avanzadas. Los síntomas iniciales, junto con la evaluación, independientemente de la edad, son cruciales.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Terapia NeoadjuvanteRESUMO
Background: The surgery with total mesorectal excision recommended by R. J. Heald in 1982 is the gold standard. Rectal cancer (RC) surgery has a morbidity rate ranging from 6 to 35%, and it can cause functional issues such as sexual, urinary, and bowel dysfunction in the long term. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been gaining ground in patients with lesions in the middle and lower rectum. The aim of the present study is to present the experience of a reference service in the treatment of RC. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study involving 53 patients diagnosed with RC between January 2017 and December 2019 with follow-up until December 2020. We examined tumor location, disease stage, digital rectal exam findings, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), therapeutic modality offered, and follow-up time. Results: A total of 32% of the patients were men and 68% were women, with a mean age of 60 years old. Location: upper rectum in 6 cases, middle rectum in 21 cases, and lower rectum in 26 cases with evolution from 9.8 to 13.5 months. The most frequent complaints were hematochezia and constipation. A total of 36 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy: 11 complete clinical response (CCR) (30.5%), 20 (55.5%) partial clinical response (PCR), and no response in 5 patients (14%). The follow-up ranged from 12 to 48 months, with a mean of 30.5 months. A total of 25% of the patients had RC that went beyond the mesorectal fascia, and 22.64% had metastases in other parts of the body when they were diagnosed. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant radio and chemotherapy present themselves as an alternative in the treatment of rectal cancer. In 36 patients, 30.5% had a complete clinical response, 55.5% had a partial clinical response, and 14% had no response. It was worth doing the "Watch and Wait" (W&W) to sample. A definitive colostomy was avoided. However, it is necessary to expand the study to a larger follow-up and more patients. Additionally, it is necessary to implement a multicenter study. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Reto/cirurgia , Antígeno Carcinoembrionário , Seguimentos , Colo/cirurgia , Exame Retal Digital , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
Resumen Introducción: el cáncer colorrectal es la cuarta causa de mortalidad asociada con cáncer en el mundo. La identificación de las metástasis de este tumor en el momento prequirúrgico es cada vez más frecuente por los estudios imagenológicos con los que se cuenta en la actualidad. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con infección por Enterobius vermicularis que simula la presencia de metástasis hepáticas. Presentación del caso: se presenta el caso de una paciente femenina proveniente del área rural, con dolor abdominal de 1 año de evolución asociado con hemorragia de vías digestivas bajas y pérdida de peso. Las imágenes y estudios endoscópicos muestran una lesión tumoral en el colon sigmoide con biopsias que reportan adenocarcinoma de colon sigmoides, además de lesiones hepáticas sugestivas de malignidad. Se llevó a resección anterior de recto y sigmoides con anastomosis alta y toma de biopsias hepáticas, que descartaron la malignidad e informaron la presencia de infección hepática por E. vermicularis. Discusión: La infección por E. vermicularis a nivel hepático presentada en el caso es poco frecuente, dicha infección puede simular la presencia de metástasis hepáticas, por lo cual debe tenerse en cuenta como diagnóstico diferencial de enfermedad metastásica de cáncer colorrectal.
Abstract Introduction: colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The identification of the metastases of this tumor in the preoperative stage is increasingly frequent due to the imaging studies currently available. We present the case of a patient with an infection caused by Enterobius vermicularis that simulates the presence of liver metastases. Case presentation: a female patient from a rural area showing a one-year abdominal pain evolution associated with lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding and weight loss. Endoscopic imaging and studies displayed a tumor lesion in the sigmoid colon, with biopsies reporting sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma and liver lesions suggesting malignancy. Anterior resection of the rectum and sigmoid was performed with high anastomosis and liver biopsies, which ruled out malignancy and reported the presence of liver infection by E. vermicularis. Discussion: in this case, the hepatic E. vermicularis infection was rare. This infection can simulate the presence of liver metastases; therefore, it should be considered a differential diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer.
RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the early results of robotic surgery-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer and transvaginal specimen extraction, regarding the operative time, operative and early postoperative complications, hospital stay, and pathological reports in a series of 10 patients. METHODS: From November 2016 to October 2019, case series study on patients diagnosed with RC was included in this study. All robotic-assisted low anterior resection of the rectum, vaginal removal of the specimen, colorectal anastomosis, and loop ileostomies were performed using the Da Vinci XI system. RESULTS: The mean age of patient was 64.8 (58-72) years. Low anterior resection was performed to seven patients, and very low anterior resection was performed to three patients. Total mesorectal excision of the rectum, transvaginal specimen extraction, transanal anastomoses, and protective ileostomy were performed in all 10 patients. The mean operative time was 275±30.50 min, and estimated blood loss was 50±10.50 mL. No patient required conversion to conventional surgery. Negative circumferential resection, proximal, and distal margins were accomplished negative. Mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 20±5.5. According to the pathological reports, all were adenocarcinoma. T1 stage was 80.0%, and T2 stage was 20.0%. Lymph node metastasis accounted for 80.0%. CONCLUSIONS: To our literature search, this is the first study reporting the early outcomes of the novel robotic surgery-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer and transvaginal specimen extraction by using the Da Vinci Xi system. It can be performed safely and successfully in selected patients by providing an excellent cosmetic body image, which may be important for women.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Reto , Resultado do Tratamento , Duração da Cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou avaliar o custo-efetividade da aplicação da radioterapia intraoperatória com elétrons (RIOe) no paciente com câncer retal localmente avançado (CRLA) submetido a radio/quimioterapia neoadjuvante seguida de ressecção incompleta (margem comprometida ou doença grosseira residual). Métodos: Para tanto, foi elaborado um modelo de Markov. Os dados de eficácia, efeitos secundários, controle local e sobrevida global foram extraídos da literatura. A perspectiva considerada foi a do sistema de saúde privado brasileiro. Considerou-se, para o custo e para a efetividade, uma taxa de desconto anual de 5%. Resultados: A estratégia que continha a RIOe mostrou-se, nesse cenário, dominante em comparação à estratégia que não envolvia essa abordagem. Os resultados mostraram-se robustos após análises de sensibilidade uni e multivariadas. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que pode ser vantajosa, tanto para os pacientes com CRLA quanto para as operadoras de saúde do mercado privado brasileiro, a aplicação de RIOe na ocorrência de cirurgia subótima, ainda que se sugira que esses dados devem ser confirmados posteriormente, por meio da coleta de dados de mundo real, devido à ausência de níveis robustos de evidência, na literatura, para esse cenário clínico específico.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy, followed by incomplete resection (compromised margin or gross residual disease). Methods: A Markov model was constructed. Data on efficacy, side effects, local control and overall survival were extracted from the literature. The perspective was that of the Brazilian private health system. For the cost and effectiveness, an annual discount rate of 5% was considered. Results: The strategy that contained IOeRT was, in this scenario, dominant, in comparison to standard of care. Results were considered robust, after univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyzes. Conclusions: We concluded that it can be advantageous, both for patients with LARC submitted to suboptimal surgery, as well as for Brazilian health insurance companies, the application of IOeRT. Although it is suggested that these results should be confirmed later, through the collection of real-world data, due to the absence of randomized controlled trials, in this specific clinical scenario.
Assuntos
Radioterapia , Neoplasias Colorretais , Cadeias de Markov , Análise Custo-Benefício , Saúde SuplementarRESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: La resección anterior del recto ultrabaja laparoscópica con anastomosis coloanal evita la realización una colostomía definitiva. Objetivo: Determinar las indicaciones, describir la técnica quirúrgica y mostrar los resultados a largo plazo obtenidos en la realización de este proceder en el tratamiento del cáncer del recto bajo. Método: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y prospectivo de 53 pacientes con cáncer del recto bajo en el período comprendido entre octubre 2007 y noviembre 2018 en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Todas las resecciones fueron llevadas a cabo por un grupo dedicado a la cirugía colorrectal, en todos los casos se realizó la excisión total del mesorrecto. Resultados: Se operaron mediante esta técnica 53 pacientes, 30 masculinos y 23 femeninos con un promedio de edad de 57 años (rango 23-81) y de ellos 42 (79,2 por ciento) después de terapia neoadyuvante. El promedio de tiempo quirúrgico fue de 195 min (rango 90-360) y las pérdidas hemáticas estimadas, de 72 mL. La incidencia de morbilidad mayor fue de 16,9 por ciento (9/53) y la media de estadía hospitalaria de 6,3 días. La media del periodo de seguimiento fue de 40 meses (rango 1-132) con una recidiva local de 9,4 por ciento (5/53) y una supervivencia global a los 5 años de 80,3 por ciento. Conclusiones: La resección anterior del recto ultrabaja laparoscópica con anastomosis coloanal es una técnica segura con excelentes resultados en cuanto a recidiva local y supervivencia global(AU)
ABSTRACT Introduction: Laparoscopic ultralow anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis prevents the performance of a definitive colostomy. Objective: To determine the indications, describe the surgical technique and show the long-term outcome of performing this procedure in the treatment of cancer of the lower rectum. Method: A descriptive and prospective observational study of 53 patients with low rectal cancer was carried out in the period between October 2007 and November 2018, at the National Center for Minimum Access Surgery. All resections were carried out by a group dedicated to colorectal surgery. In all cases, the total mesorectal excision was performed. Results: 53 patients (30 males and 23 females), with an average age of 57 years (range 23-81) and 42 (79.2 percent) after neoadjuvant therapy were operated using this technique. The average surgical time was 195 min (range 90-360) and the estimated blood loss was 72 mL. The incidence of major morbidity was 16.9 percent (9/53) and the average hospital stay was 6.3 days. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range 1-132), with a local relapse of 9.4 percent (5/53) and a 5-year overall survival of 80.3 percent. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis is a safe technique with excellent outcomes in terms of local relapse and overall survival(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Retais/epidemiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Protectomia/métodos , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudo ObservacionalRESUMO
El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar ventajas potenciales de la radioterapia de intensidad modulada (IMRT) vs. la radioterapia 3D (3DRT) en el control loco-regional y la toxicidad aguda en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (CRLA). Se analizaron retrospectivamente 235 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto T2/T4 y N0/N1 sometidos a radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante entre febrero de 2010 y agosto de 2015. La modalidad radiante se correlacionó con los resultados clínicos (control local y a distancia) y las tasas de toxicidades agudas urinarias, hematológicas, gastrointestinales (GI) y dérmicas. Ciento cuarenta (59.6%) recibieron IMRT y 95 (40.4%) 3DRT. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 36 meses. Las tasas de recidiva local y metástasis a distancia fueron similares entre IMRT y 3DRT. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en control local (CL) ni en supervivencia global (SG) entre IMRT y 3DRT (p=0.56 y p=0.24, respectivamente), ni en colostomía libre para tumores rectales bajos (p=0.44). IMRT implicó menor toxicidad cutánea (p<0.001), hematológica (p<0.0001), urinaria (p=0.0017), y gastrointestinal (p=0.0006). La incidencia de diarrea grado ≥ 3 fue del 16% entre los pacientes del grupo 3DRT frente al 5% de del grupo IMRT. En el análisis univariado, el estadio clínico T, edad, KPS, y quimioterapia adyuvante se asociaron con mejor SG (todos p<0.05) y la dosis total de radiación se asoció con mejor período libre de enfermedad (p=0.0065) Postulamos que IMRT permitiría un aumento de dosis en forma segura con el potencial de aumentar la tasa de respuestas patológicas completas (RPC), en particular en tumores rectales bajos (AU)
The aim was to compare the advantages of IMRT vs. 3D in loco regional control and acute toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectum cancer. We analyzed retrospectively 235 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T2/T4 and N0/N1 undergoing chemo radiation between February 2010 and August 2015. The radiant modality was correlated with clinical outcomes (local and systemic control) and rates of acute urinary, hematological, gastrointestinal and dermal toxicities. One hundred and forty patients (59.6%) received IMRT and 95 (40.4%) received 3D. The median follow-up time was 36 months. The rates of local recurrence and distant metastases were similar between IMRT vs. 3D. No statistically significant differences were found in local control or survival between IMRT and 3D (p=0.56 and p =0.24, respectively), nor in free colostomy for low rectal tumors (p= 0.44). IMRT resulted in lower dermal (p<0.001), hematological (p<0.0001), urinary (p=0.0017), and gastrointestinal toxicity (p=0.0006). The incidence of diarrhea grade ≥ 3 was 16% among 3D patients vs. 5% in IMRT. In the univariate analysis, clinical stage T, age, KPS, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better overall survival (all p<0.05) and the total dose of radiation was associated with better disease-free period (p=0.0065). We postulate that IMRT would allow us to increase dose in a safe manner with the potential to increase rate of complete pathological responses, particularly in low rectal tumors (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Terapia NeoadjuvanteRESUMO
El presente reporte describe las características del cáncer gástrico temprano sometido a tratamiento quirúrgico en el Servicio de Cirugía de Estómago del Hospital Nacional Rebagliati en el quinquenio comprendido entre enero del 2004 y diciembre del 2008. La edad promedio fue de 68 años; predomina el sexo masculino, la localización distal, la infiltración a submucosa y el tipo histológico intestinal. La metástasis ganglionar se presenta en el 13%.
This report describes the characteristics of early gastric cancer surgically treated in the Gastric Cancer Unit at Rebagliati National Hospital between January 2004 and December 2008. Mean age was 68 years; males, distal location, submucosa infiltration and intestinal histological type predominate in these patients. Lymph node involvement was 13%.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
Objetivo. Determinar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico y/o adyuvante en mejorar la calidad de vida en pacientes con cáncer de colon en comparación al de cáncer rectal. Material y Métodos. Estudio de cohortes ambispectivo que evaluó 27 pacientes con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma de colon (Grupo A=12) y de recto (Grupo B= 15) resecable atendidos en el Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas de Trujillo desde el 1 de enero 2008 hasta el 31 de julio del 2009. Resultados. La calidad vida global, valorada por el cuestionario QLQ-C30 a los 3 meses del postoperatorio fue de 67.86 más menos 17.90 puntos vs. 68.50 más menos 11.94 puntos respectivamente para los pacientes del grupos A y B (p = 0.934). La función social fue mejor en pacientes sometidos a cirugía en el Grupo A que en el grupo B (37.50 +/- 13.36 puntos vs. 60.00 +/- 13.69 puntos; p = 0.018). La imagen corporal a los 3 meses valorada por el cuestionario QLQ-CR-29 tuvo una puntuación media de 28.12 +/- 6.12 puntos y 50.00 +/- 25.00 puntos para los pacientes del Grupo A y B respectivamente (p = 0.034). Los pacientes del Grupo A presentaron una puntuación promedio a los 6 meses para la función sexual de 33.33 +/- 12.91 puntos, mientras que los pacientes del Grupo B su puntuación promedio fue 65.00 +/- 22.36 puntos (p = 0.016). Conclusiones. Ambas cirugías para cáncer de colon y recto tienen la misma efectividad en mejorar la calidad de vida global de dichos pacientes, sin embargo la función social, imagen corporal, y función sexual es mejor en cirugía de colon.
Objective. Determine the effectiveness of surgical treatment and/or adjuvant to improve the quality of life in patients with colon cancer compared to rectal cancer. Material and Methods. Cohort study that evaluated 27 patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma (Group A= 12) and rectum (Group B= 15) resectable treated at the Institute Regional of Neoplastic Diseases of Trujillo since the 1 January 2008 until 31 July 2009. Results. The overall life quality, as assessed by the QLQ-C 30 at 3 months postoperatively was 67.86 +/- 17.90 points vs. 68.50 +/- 11.94 points respectively for the patients of groups A and B (p= 0.934). The social function was better in patients undergoing surgery for Group A than Group B , (37.50 + 13.36 points vs. 60.00 + 13.69 points, p = 0.018). Body image at 3 months assessed by the QLQ-CR-29 had an average score of 28.12 +/- 6.12 points and 50.00 +/- 25.00 points for Group A y B respectively (p = 0.034). The Group A patients had a mean score at 6 months for sexual function of 33.33 +/- 12.91 points, while Group B patients this average score was 65.00 +/- 22.36 points (p = 0.016). Conclusions . Both surgeries for colon and rectal cancer are as effective in improving the overall quality of life of these patients, however the social function, body image, and sexual function is better in colon surgery.