Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker on oxidative stress and metabolism of elements in kidney of STZ-induced diabetic rats.

In diabetes, increased oxidative stress and impaired trace element metabolism play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. The objective of this research was to examine the outcomes of blocking the renin-angiotensin system, using either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), perindopril, or the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker, irbesartan, on oxidative stress and trace element levels such as Zn, Mg, Cu, and Fe in the kidneys of diabetic rats that had been induced with streptozotocin. Thirty-two Wistar albino male rats were equally divided into four groups. The first group was used as a control. The second group of rats developed diabetes after receiving a single intraperitoneal dose of STZ. The third and fourth groups of rats had STZ-induced diabetes and received daily dosages of irbesartan (15 mg/kg b.w/day) and perindopril (6 mg/kg b.w/day) treatment, respectively. Biochemical analysis of the kidneys showed a distinct increase in oxidative stress, indicated by heightened levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, as well as reduced glutathione (GSH) levels in the kidneys of diabetic rats. In the kidneys of diabetic rats, the mean levels of Fe and Cu were found to be significantly higher than those of the control group. Additionally, the mean levels of Zn and Mg were significantly lower in the diabetic rats compared to the control rats. Both perindopril and irbesartan decreased significantly MDA content and increased SOD activities and GSH levels in the kidneys of rats with diabetes. The Zn and Mg concentrations in the kidneys of diabetic rats treated with perindopril and irbesartan were markedly higher than in untreated STZ-diabetic rats, while the Cu and Fe concentrations were significantly lower. The urinary excretion of rats treated with perindopril and irbesartan showed a pronounced increase in Cu levels, along with a significant reduction in Zn and Mg levels. Although diabetic rats demonstrated degenerative morphological alterations in their kidneys, both therapies also improved diabetes-induced histopathological modifications in the kidneys. Finally, the present results suggest that manipulating the levels of Zn, Mg, Cu, and Fe - either through ACE inhibition or by blocking AT1 receptors - could be advantageous in reducing lipid peroxidation and increasing antioxidant concentration in the kidneys of diabetic rats.

Perindopril improves cardiac fibrosis through targeting the AngII/AT1R pathway.

To uncover the potential effect of Perindopril on cardiac fibrosis caused by pressure overload and the underlying mechanism. Cardiac fibrosis model in mice was established by TAC method. Mice were assigned into sham group, TAC group, 2 mg/kg Perindopril group (Per (2 mg/kg)) and 8 mg/kg Perindopril group (Per (8 mg/kg)). Cardiac structure changes were assessed by measuring HW/BW, HW/TBL, LW/BW and LW/TBL in each group. Echocardiography was performed to assess mouse cardiac function by recording EF, LVIDd, IVSd and LVPWd. Relative levels of fibrosis markers were determined. AngII content was examined by ELISA. Besides, mRNA levels of key genes in the AngII/AT1R pathway were finally detected. TAC induced cardiac insufficiency, left ventricular dilatation, cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial collagen deposition in mice. In addition, fibrosis markers were upregulated in mice of TAC group. Perindopril markedly reversed TAC-induced pathological changes in cardiac structure and function of mice. Meanwhile, Perindopril dose-dependently reversed the upregulated genes in the AngII/AT1R pathway. Perindopril improves cardiac fibrosis induced by pressure overload through activating the AngII/AT1R pathway.

Utilization of erythrosine B in spectrofluorimetric quenching analysis of amlodipine and perindopril in pharmaceutical and biological matrices.

A spectrofluorimetric approach that is sensitive, simple, validated, and cost-effective has been proposed for the estimation of amlodipine (AML) and perindopril (PER) in their bulk powders, pharmaceutical formulations, and spiked human plasma. The recommended approach utilized the quantitative quenching effect of the two cited drugs on the fluorescence intensity of erythrosine B, as a result of complex binary reactions among each drug with erythrosine B at pH 3.5 (Teorell and Stenhagen buffer). The quenching of erythrosine B fluorescence was recorded at 554 nm after excitation at 527 nm. The calibration curve was detected in the range 0.25-3.0 µg ml-1 , with a correlation coefficient of 0.9996 for AML, and 0.1-1.5 µg ml-1 , with a correlation coefficient of 0.9996 for PER. The established spectrofluorimetric approach was validated for the estimation of the cited drugs with high sensitivity regarding International Council on Harmonization guidelines. Therefore, the established approach could be utilized for quality control of the cited drugs in their pharmaceutical formulations.

Comparison of antihypertensive drugs amlodipine and perindopril on blood pressure variability after long-term treatment of hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab.

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the therapeutic effect of different antihypertensive drugs (amlodipine and perindopril) on hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab. Sixty patients with hypertension treated with apatinib or bevacizumab were selected and divided into two groups: one group was treated with amlodipine and the other group was treated with perindopril. Before and after treatment, the dynamic blood pressure (BP) measurement (systolic BP [SBP] and diastolic BP [DBP]), echocardiography (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, interventricular septal thickness [IVST], left ventricular posterior wall thickness [LVPWT], and left atrial diameter [LAD]), and detection of nitric oxide (NO) content in venous blood were performed. In the amlodipine group, the 24hSBP, 24hSSD, 24hSCV, daytime mean SBP (dSBP), daytime mean SSD (dSSD), daytime mean SBP CV, night mean SBP (nSBP), night mean SSD, 24hDBP, 24hDSD, 24 h DBP CV, daytime mean DBP (dDBP), daytime mean DSD (dDSD), daytime mean DBP CV, night mean DBP (nDBP), LAD, and LAD index (LADi) after treatment were all lower than before treatment, while NO was higher than before treatment (all P < 0.05). In the perindopril group, the 24hSBP, dSBP, nSBP, 24hDBP, dDBP, nDBP, LAD, LADi, IVST, LVPWT, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) after treatment were lower than before treatment, and NO level after treatment was higher than before treatment (all P < 0.05). After treatment, the 24hSBP, 24hSSD, dSBP, dSSD, nSBP, 24hDBP, 24hDSD, dDBP, dDSD, nDBP, night mean DSD, and NO were all lower while the LAD, LADi, IVST, LVPWT, and LVMI were higher in the amlodipine group than those in the perindopril group (all P < 0.05). Our study suggests that the SBP and DBP variability of amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab is slightly better than that of perindopril, but the effect of perindopril in improving endothelial function indices NO and echocardiographic data is better than that of amlodipine.

Exploration of polymethacrylate and Hypromellose for the development of a non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor mucoadhesive system using Box-Behnken design: in-vitro and ex-vivo evaluation.

PURPOSE: To counteract early morning pathology like hypertension a time-dependent release of the drug is required. This study is focused to formulate a pulsatile and mucoadhesive drug delivery system of an ACE inhibitor Perindopril Erbumine. METHOD: Two matrix tablets were punched with Eudragit RSPO, Eudragit RLPO, and HPMC K15M using a 3-3-3 Box-Behnken Design of Response Surface Methodology. Based on the design-optimized formulation P1T3 and P2T8 were coated for a lag time with compression coating of HPMC K4M and a blend of 1:1 ratio of ethylcellulose and carbopol polymer and further encapsulated in a Eudracap™ capsule to provide gastric resistance. RESULT: The in-vitro release data confirmed an initial pause phase of 4.5 h then release of the drug for 5.2 ± 0.3 h to cope with the early morning rush in blood pressure. After that, a gap of 6 h and then sustained release of the drug for 10.5 ± 0.5 h. From the ex-vivo study, mucoadhesive strength was obtained as 55.13 ± 0.03 gm and 56.39 ± 0.02 gm for P1T3 and P2T8 respectively. The lag time for coated tablet P1T3 came to 2.15 ± 0.15 h and for P2T8 11.9 ± 0.10 h proving the coating efficiency of polymers. CONCLUSION: The current study strongly suggests that perindopril Erbumine in association with Eudragit and Hypromellose polymer can open a path for the time-regulated release of the drug for hypertension chronotherapy with less risk of dose dumping.

Antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in patients with essential hypertension. BACKGROUND: The comparison of antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and perindopril were controversial. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched for all published studies. RESULTS: The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 753 patients included in 7 trials with a mean follow-up of 20 ± 16 weeks. There was no significant difference between telmisartan and perindopril in reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP, weighted mean differences (WMD) 0.02 (95% confidence interval (CI), ‒2.78, 2.81) mm Hg, p > 0.05). The reduction of diastolic BP (DBP) treated with telmisartan was greater than perindopril in these patients (WMD ‒2.05 (95% CI, ‒2.60, ‒1.49) mm Hg, p < 0.001). Considering the effects of different doses on BP reduction, a sub-analysis was performed. The reduction of DBP treated with 40 mg/day telmisartan was greater than 4‒5 mg/day perindopril (WMD ‒2.18 (95% CI, ‒2.83, ‒1.53) mm Hg, p 0.05). CONCLUSION: The reduction of DBP is greater treated with telmisartan than perindopril in patients with essential hypertension (Tab. 2, Fig. 4, Ref. 34). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: essential hypertension, blood pressure, telmisartan, perindopril, meta-analysis.

In the prevention of dementia, the focus should be on early and consistent treatment of hypertension.

The brain is among the target organs of hypertension. Patients with hypertension have a higher risk of developing stroke as well as experiencing a decline in cognitive functions and dementia. Changes in the white matter and atrophy of the grey matter of the brain induced by high blood pressure develop insidiously since the onset of hypertension, even in young individuals. The effect of high blood pressure on the vessel wall cumulates in time; therefore, hypertension in younger people implies an increased risk of dementia in older age. Hypertension in young age cannot be considered a benign condition. Hypertension in middle age increases the risk of dementia by 61 %. Consistent and early hypertension control can reverse the adverse development towards dementia and lack of self-sufficiency in the patient. Data comparing individual antihypertensive drugs in terms of preventing dementia are scarce. However, renin angiotensin system blockers have been found to protect against Alzheimer's disease more than other classes of antihypertensive drugs. To achieve rapid and effective hypertension control, a combination of antihypertensive drugs is usually required. Using a fixed-dose triple combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine, blood pressure targets of < 130/80 mm Hg can be achieved within three months in 93 % of patients.

[Efficacy and Organoprotection of Triple Combinations in the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension].

The 2022 draft Russian guidelines on arterial hypertension recommend initiation of antihypertensive therapy with a combination of drugs in most patients with blood pressure above 150 / 90 mm Hg and / or in the presence of high-risk criteria. In 2021, the results of a 12-year analysis of the Brisighella Heart Study (BHS) were published. The aim of this study was to compare the use of different triple antihypertensive drug combinations in an Italian cohort of patients in real-life clinical practice. Combination antihypertensive therapy with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, amlodipine, and thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics provides a better blood pressure control compared to other antihypertensive drug combinations. The use of the triple combination of amlodipine/indapamide/perindopril is associated with a better metabolic profile than any other considered combination of antihypertensive drugs and a more pronounced organ-protective effect.

MULTIPLE BCCS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVI AFTER ACE INHIBITORS (ENALAPRIL/PERINDOPRIL): THE ROLE OF NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/AVAILABILITY AS SUBSTANTIAL SKIN CANCER TRIGGERING FACTOR.

Nitrosamines as contaminants in a wide variety of drugs are also found to be one of the most likely causes of skin cancer. A detailed analysis of this contamination could in the near future solve to a large extent the puzzle of carcinogenesis concerning the keratinocytic forms of cancer and melanoma. But also, probably cancer in general. Over 80% of skin cancer is due to acquired mutations, and nitrosamines, which are contained as contamination in certain batches of the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (such as sartans, ACE inhibitors, ranitidine, metformin, hydrochlorothiazide, rifampicin, and a number of others.) are considered among the most powerful external mutagens, carcinogens. Carcinogens that until 2021 were not supposed to be present in medicines and carcinogens for which it was subsequently decided to create a regulatory regime for permissible availability. Regardless of whether these contaminants are applied within the so-called daily acceptable intake dose or many times above it, the problem with the availability of nitrosamines continues to be present. It is also caused by the lack of reflection of the concentration of the corresponding nitrosamine in a certain drug. Thus, it is impossible to calculate the ˝permissible daily intake of the total number of mutagens and their concentration based on polymedication˝. In practice, drug manufacturers distribute nitrosamines in parallel with drugs, although they are not listed as a component of the product but are identified and allowed as contamination or substances with permissible availability by the EMA/FDA. From another point of view, the fact that is not commented on is also of interest, namely that not all batches are affected by this contamination. This suggests that the contamination may have been controlled, since in a manufacturing error the contamination should be widespread. The registration of the potential contamination of a heterogeneous type of medicinal products on the European market to the executive agencies for drug control in certain geographical areas has remained for years without any answer and opens a number of questions. The problem with ACE inhibitors is similar to that with sartans, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, and ranitidine. The ˝special impression˝ of the clinicians is determined by the fact that the patterns of manifestation of the skin tumors during the administration of a heterogeneous class of medications are similar to completely identical. From this it could be concluded that the unifying factor between the pattern of occurrence could not be based on the action of the main substance of each drug class, since it remains to be radically different. The unifying link remains the sole and only contamination or the permissible already availability of a new ingredient known as nitrosamines. We present cases of multiple basal cell carcinomas and dysplastic nevi following enalapril and perindopril administration. The role of potential contamination of ACE inhibitors with nitrosamines for the development of skin cancer is discussed.

METASTATIC NODULAR MELANOMA DEVELOPING ON NEVUS SPILUS DURING INTAKE OF BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/NEBIVOLOL) AND ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL). POTENTIAL LINKS TО THE DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS/CARCINOGENESIS, DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT AND GENETIC WEAPONS OF THE NEW GENERATION.

Drug-induced Nitrosogenesis/Carcinogenesis turns out to be a ubiquitous, pervasive, large-scale, poorly controllable concept for the academic community, which underlies the long-term, permanent modification of the human genome by contact with nitrosamines/NDSRIs, which ultimately leads to the generation of diverse cancers, but also melanoma in particular. The discovery of a (currently) unclassifiable number of nitroso derivatives/genome modifiers in the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (in about 300 preparations according to the FDA/includes beta blockers/bisoprolol/nebivolol and ACE inhibitors/perindopril), their forced tolerability, attributed as a necessity or lack of alternative also to the present (but also to future periods), and their proven carcinogenicity (already 70 years ago), suggest a kind of creepy form of experiment to which public health is subjected worldwide. The creation of a universal nitroso-comfort of pharmaceutical companies and the regulation of a permanent intake of carcinogens in drugs for years to come, but also decades back, suggest possible cartel agreements between the regulation/distribution unit and that of production cycles. These "agreements" are becoming increasingly evident and in all likelihood position nitrosogenesis from a until recently unknown element, to a pathogenetic factor of paramount importance. Melanoma could be viewed precisely as the controlled end gene-modified product of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis, proven to be a locoregional (but not only) phenomenon hundreds if not thousands of times. The dilemma stays: Are the nitrosamines in drugs genetic weapons, ethnic bioweapons for silent war ? The nitrosogenesis concerning melanoma leads to the logical conclusion that cancer is in fact a largely controlled set event or, according to others, a forced necessity of evolutionary globalization processes to purge the population in certain regions. In favor of this statement indicative are namely: 1) lack of regulatory control/results of such conducted, 2) complete information veil for the end user regarding contamination with carcinogens/nitrosamines in certain batches or all batches of drugs, 3) misinformation and lack of transparency regarding the concept of nitrosogenesis also for the academic community, as well as 4) the impunity to pharmaceutical conglomerates after criminal negligence/controlled criminogenicity proven thousands of times by the FDA/EMA leading to regulatory controlled drug mediated genocide of the human population in certain areas on a daily basis. And most important of all: 5) the lack of refusal to eliminate these drugs, i.e. - the imposition of forced tolerance at any cost. It is extremely unfortunate that the mentioned and identified grotesque/situation, its tolerance on a global scale, lead to a misjudgement of the significance of real tumor inducers within the global health map//statistics as well as melanoma. The focus of prevention is being displaced, while the incidence of cancer in general and that of melanoma is skyrocketing. Nitrosamines could be defined as the newest, modern, until recently invisible and unknown, but -controllable form of genetic weapon to modify the human genome. Because of these very facts, the likelihood that clinicians and the academic community are in the frozen and permanent state of the Dunning-Kruger effect is very real. Certain globalization regulatory elements create problems and assignments that must be solved ˝competently˝ by incompetent, fully regulatable compartments. As their state of competence depends again and entirely on ˝their incompetence˝. Until now. After the formalization of the concept of Nitrosogenesis (as a form of genetic weapon) and melanoma for example, but not only, it remains to be seen whether universal incompetence will become a guarantee of competence and the survival. Or- will it remain again at the level of globalized, criminally conditioned, appointed and regulated from above "competent incompetence". The dilemmas to regulators and manufacturers remain open : Is it competent to take drugs that contain carcinogens/nitrosamines? Is it competent for this issue to continue for decades with impunity? Is it competent for regulators not to inform consumers about the presence of carcinogens/genome modifiers in medicines for decades? Is it competent for certain regions to be affected by nitrosamine contamination and not others? Is it competent not to reflect this in regional and global health bulletins on side effects? Is it competent to make thousands of times the profits from the modified genetic map business, regulated and legally initiated through the intake of carcinogens? Is it competent to have the concentration of carcinogens within polymedication exceeding many times the daily allowable doses of carcinogens and have no solution for this? Is it competent, when the intake of nitrosamines in medicines is associated with the generation of melanomas and heterogeneous cancers- to have no alternative to this or when one is available- to conceal it skillfully? Is it competent to determine carcinogenic activity based on mutagenic tests? Is it competent to be polyincompetent within a framework of mass (in)competence? We report systemically administered drugs for the treatment of high blood pressure from the group of beta blockers (bisoprolol/nebivolol) and ACE inhibitors (perindopril) that have been identified by regulators in the face of FDA as hypothetically contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs with a carcinogenic potency between 4 and 5, respectively. Within this cumulative intake, (which according to the regulators was not at risk of developing cancerous forms), similar to other cases in the world literature, the patient developed a relatively short-term, metastatic nevus spilus-based nodular melanoma. The paper analyses not only the role of nitrosogenesis, but also that of two pregnancies and painful sunburns as potential cofactors for melanoma genesis. Academic attention is drawn to the potential impact of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis. Nitrosamines in the framework of polycontamination and polymedication could also be identified as one of the most effective, until recently unknown, modern generation genetic weapons for modifying the human genome and controlling cancer. Moreover, they could be controllably applied and skillfully targeted. At least until now. The officialization of carcinogens in more than 250 of the most common drugs and the clinico-pathological correlations concerning the development of cancer/melanoma in poorly controlled geographical regions represent a kind of in vivo prospective study to determine precisely the real carcinogenic role of nitrosamines to date.

А FLAVOUR OF DEATH: PERINDOPRIL INDUCED THICK MELANOMA AND BCC OF THE BACK. POTENTIAL ROLE OF THE GENERIC SUBSTANCE OR/-AND POSSIBLE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION AS SKIN CANCER KEY TRIGGERING FACTORS.

Contamination of certain drugs and foods with one of the most potent carcinogens/mutagens- nitrosamines, remains to be an issue and unresolved at present. The increased contamination of these mutagens in the most commonly used drugs in the human population doesn't ceases to baffle clinicians, critics, public scholars, and analysts of the nitrosamine saga. The introduction of permissive determinations of the presence of carcinogens in drugs only reinforces doubts about the powerlessness of regulatory authorities in the face of the influence of powerful pharmaceutical cartels. The FDA's encouraging promises of 2018 for strict control of carcinogens in sartans seems to have been permanently forgotten? By 2021, it was unthinkable that these carcinogens would be present in blood drugs and affected batches were immediately removed. Following alert checks confirming their post-existence in diabetes drugs, anti-smoking drugs, a number of antibiotics, ACE inhibitors, Sartans, thiazide diuretics, ranitidine, but probably a number of others, the decision has been taken to give the green light to their permissible availability. An availability that in all likelihood has the flavour of death. A "flavour" that has been confirmed in hundreds of international publications. Or in data from scientific papers submitted to regulatory regional units for verification and which remain sadly silent to this day. The "silent confirmation" and the lack of any adequate response in favour of public health are a sufficient further indicator of the attitude and position of the regulatory authorities. A position that should be changed. Starting from the mentioned facts and the data announced already in 2016/2017 of all-American data shared originally in American scientific journals, using their statistical estimates, we present the first case in the world literature of nodular melanoma and basal cell carcinoma occurring after taking perindopril. This intake turns out to be confirmatory one with respect to the statistics presented by Beatrice Nardone dating back to 2017. The potential pro-carcinogenic effects of both nitrosamines and the generic substance of perindopril are discussed.

NITROSOGENESIS OF SKIN CANCER: THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN THE CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE), BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL), SARTANS (VALSARTAN/LOSARTAN), ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL/ENALAPRIL), TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS (MELITRACEN), SSRIS (PAROXETINE), SNRIS (VENLAFAXINE) AND METFORMIN: THE MOST PROBABLE EXPLANATION FOR THE RISING SKIN CANCER INCIDENCE.

The Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is a newly introduced concept in medical science, the significance of which is yet to be the subject of detailed analyses and discussions. Contamination of the most commonly used drugs for systemic treatment worldwide (such as Angiotensin receptor II blockers/ARBs, ACE inhibitors, Beta blockers, Thiazide diuretics, Metformin, Ranitidine, Nizatidine, tricyclic antidepressants, anticoagulants/dabigatran, Rifampicin, calcium channel blockers, SSRIs/ selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, Varenicline) is already a fact and is more than worrying but also indicative. It is "this relationship" that has been repeatedly described in the medical literature (initially) as an association, and subsequently now increasingly as a causal relationship, a pathogenetic relationship. Observational data from clinicians over the past year increasingly speak in favour of a pathogenetic link and associate every single drug declared as contaminated with the development of heterogeneous forms of skin cancer gradually and surely. New drugs are added monthly that have not yet been declared as actually/potentially contaminated but are probably known to regulatory authorities or are in the process of being clarified. In parallel, the number of nitrosamines identified as contaminants in medicines is growing. This should not be surprising to anyone: ˝You take 3 drugs contaminated with mutagens- you subsequently develop skin cancer˝. Polymorbidity and multimedication against the background of polycontamination with nitrosamines appears to be the most serious problem at present. While until recently polymorbidity was considered to be a key factor in carcinogenesis (generator, trigger, inducer), today this dogma should be re-examined or looked at from another, radically different angle: from the angle of polycontamination to multimedication within polymorbidity. It is this that could provide a good explanation for the pandemic concerning skin cancer, for example. The development of relatively identical patterns of manifestation of skin tumors after concomitant intake of drugs declared as contaminated (drugs from the classes already mentioned above/ with radically different mechanism of action) supports unequivocally the thesis that: the nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is an undeniable fact that should be studied in detail. Studied because it could be eliminated. The analysis presented within this scientific thesis concerns 4 polymorbid patients who developed skin tumors within the framework of the multimedication they were assigned. The concomitant intake of medications declared as contaminated (in the presented patients) led to the manifestation of single or multiple skin neoplasms that were successfully treated surgically. Once again, the importance of potential/actual contamination of beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, oral antidiabetic drugs, and sartans in the generation of 1) non-melanocytic forms of skin cancer, and 2) melanoma precursor lesions or so-called dysplastic moles is established and validated. The possible contamination with nitrosamines of 1) other types of tricyclic antidepressant- Melitracen; 2) antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class: Paroxetine; 3) antidepressant of the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) class: Venlafaxine, as well as of the systemic anticoagulant: apixaban is highlighted for the first time in the world literature.

THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/METOPROLOL), ACE INHIBITORS (LISINOPRIL/PERINDOPRIL), THIAZIDES DIURETICS (HCT), CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE/FELODIPINE), SARTANS (CANDESARTAN) AND ТHE SUBSEQUENT SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION: APOCALYPSE NOW.

The problem of contamination of the most commonly used medicines with nitrosamines is worsening worldwide. According to recent literature data, this "contamination" is the cause not only of skin cancer (keratinocytic/melanoma) but also of gastrointestinal neoplasms, brain tumours, neuroblastoma, rectal carcinoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and many others. It is these clinical manifestations that are associated with/ or already directly linked to the nitrosamine content of drugs and food products used by patients in previous periods. And it is this permissive availability/contamination that could prove to be the most likely, powerful inducer of acquired mutations underlying the worldwide cancer pandemic. Of further concern is the evidence of contamination of newer classes of medications by nitrosamines- namely: beta blockers, calcium antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In practice, mankind faces the problem of certainly over 1 billion patients taking nitrosamine-contaminated drugs: 280 million patients with depression (antidepressants), over 1 billion patients with arterial hypertension (antihypertensive drugs), over half a billion patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (oral antidiabetic drugs/metformin/ sitagliptin), over 4 billion patients with gastritis (ranitidine), over 5 million with tuberculosis (rifampicin), and probably a number of others. The calculations are apocalyptic, since even if only 20-30% of the groups were affected, the number of patients taking these drugs would, by a rough calculation, currently amount to over 1 billion. And there are certainly other classes of drugs yet to be announced. It is for this reason that we should not be surprised that the data on the development of keratinocyte cancer after intake of nitrosamine-contaminated preparations is growing at a breakneck pace. This data indirectly but strongly confirms the importance of a newly introduced concept in the medical science : Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer. A concept, until recently unknown, incomprehensible, but at the same time frightening and gradually accepted, imposing itself and which with each passing day is gaining more and more scientific significance and "visibility", "scientific tangibility, receptivity, and acceptability." This article presents, for the first time in the world literature, patients who developed single/multiple forms of keratinocytic cancer (partly in combination with melanoma precursors-dysplastic moles) after administration of two new classes of potentially nitrosamine-contaminated antihypertensive drugs: beta blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol) and calcium antagonists (amlodipine, felodipine). For the first time in the scientific literature, the contributory pro-carcinogenic role of another potentially nitrosamine-contaminated ACE inhibitor- lisinopril , as well as that of candesartan: in the development of keratinocytic cancer is also discussed. For the first time in the world literature, the conclusion regarding the pathogenetic relationship between the intake of potentially contaminated drugs (from different drug groups) and cancer development is based on the model of the equivalent clinical manifestation of skin tumors (rather than on controlled long-term prospective analyses). Nitrosamine contamination in these drug groups appears to be the sole and major unifying factor or causative agent for these manifestations.

Comparison of Dual Therapies for Lowering Blood Pressure in Black Africans.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension among black African patients is high, and these patients usually need two or more medications for blood-pressure control. However, the most effective two-drug combination that is currently available for blood-pressure control in these patients has not been established. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, three-group trial conducted in six countries in sub-Saharan Africa, we randomly assigned 728 black patients with uncontrolled hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg while the patient was not being treated or was taking only one antihypertensive drug) to receive a daily regimen of 5 mg of amlodipine plus 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide, 5 mg of amlodipine plus 4 mg of perindopril, or 4 mg of perindopril plus 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide for 2 months. Doses were then doubled (10 and 25 mg, 10 and 8 mg, and 8 and 25 mg, respectively) for an additional 4 months. The primary end point was the change in the 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and 63% were women. Among the 621 patients who underwent 24-hour blood-pressure monitoring at baseline and at 6 months, those receiving amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide and those receiving amlodipine plus perindopril had a lower 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure than those receiving perindopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (between-group difference in the change from baseline, -3.14 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.90 to -0.38; P = 0.03; and -3.00 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.8 to -0.20; P = 0.04, respectively). The difference between the group receiving amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide and the group receiving amlodipine plus perindopril was -0.14 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.90 to 2.61; P=0.92). Similar differential effects on office and ambulatory diastolic blood pressures, along with blood-pressure control and response rates, were apparent among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in black patients in sub-Saharan Africa, amlodipine plus either hydrochlorothiazide or perindopril was more effective than perindopril plus hydrochlorothiazide at lowering blood pressure at 6 months. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Africa Noncommunicable Disease Open Lab; CREOLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02742467.).

Primary prevention of chronic anthracycline cardiotoxicity with ACE inhibitor is temporarily effective in rabbits, but benefits wane in post-treatment follow-up.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) have been used to treat anthracycline (ANT)-induced cardiac dysfunction, and they appear beneficial for secondary prevention in high-risk patients. However, it remains unclear whether they truly prevent ANT-induced cardiac damage and provide long-lasting cardioprotection. The present study aimed to examine the cardioprotective effects of perindopril on chronic ANT cardiotoxicity in a rabbit model previously validated with the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (DEX) with focus on post-treatment follow-up (FU). Chronic cardiotoxicity was induced by daunorubicin (DAU; 3 mg/kg/week for 10 weeks). Perindopril (0.05 mg/kg/day) was administered before and throughout chronic DAU treatment. After the completion of treatment, significant benefits were observed in perindopril co-treated animals, particularly full prevention of DAU-induced mortality and prevention or significant reductions in cardiac dysfunction, plasma cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels, morphological damage, and most of the myocardial molecular alterations. However, these benefits significantly waned during 3 weeks of drug-free FU, which was not salvageable by administering a higher perindopril dose. In the longer (10-week) FU period, further worsening of left ventricular function and morphological damage occurred together with heart failure (HF)-related mortality. Continued perindopril treatment in the FU period did not reverse this trend but prevented HF-related mortality and reduced the severity of the progression of cardiac damage. These findings contrasted with the robust long-lasting protection observed previously for DEX in the same model. Hence, in the present study, perindopril provided only temporary control of ANT cardiotoxicity development, which may be associated with the lack of effects on ANT-induced and topoisomerase II ß (TOP2B)-dependent DNA damage responses in the heart.

The cardioprotective effects of perindopril in a model of polymicrobial sepsis: The role of radical oxygen species and the inflammation pathway.

Mortality rates associated with myocardial dysfunction due to sepsis and septic shock are generally high across the world. The present study focused on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of perindopril (PER) for the purpose of preventing the adverse effects of sepsis on the myocardium and developing new alternatives in treatment. The control group received only saline solution via the oral route for 4 days. The second group underwent cecal ligation puncture (CLP), and the third underwent CLP and received PER (2 mg/kg). Rats in the third group received 2 mg/kg PER per oral (p.o.) from 4 days before induction of sepsis. Thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS), total thiol (-SH), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB/p65) levels increased in the CLP groups. In contrast, PER (2 mg/kg) decreased the levels of biochemical parameters other than total-SH and decreased 8-OHdG, NF-κB/p65 immunopositivity in rat heart tissues. The data from this study show that impairment of the oxidant/antioxidant balance and inflammatory cytokine levels in favor of inflammation in heart tissue under septic conditions results in severe tissue damage. PER administration before sepsis was shown to exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties by reducing these effects. This in turn increased the importance of PER as new evidence of its protective effects in heart tissue.

Effectiveness of indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: post-hoc analysis of the ARBALET study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with an indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination (SPC) in outpatients with uncontrolled isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) aged over 55 years in real-life clinical practice. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with ISH from ARBALET, a 3-month, multicenter, observational, open-label study conducted in Russia among patients with grade I or II hypertension who were either uncontrolled on previous antihypertensive treatment or treatment-naïve. The effectiveness of indapamide/amlodipine SPC was assessed by the change in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the rate of target SBP (< 140 mmHg) achievement at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months, in four age groups: 55-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80 years or older. RESULTS: The ARBALET study recruited 2217 patients, of whom 626 had ISH and were included in this post-hoc analysis (mean age 66.1 ± 7.8 years; 165 men [26.4%] and 461 women [73.6%]). Target SBP < 140 mmHg was achieved in 43%, 75% and 93% of patients at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months, respectively. SBP decreased from baseline by 18.8 ± 10.5 mmHg, 27.2 ± 10.6 mmHg and 31.8 ± 9.9 mmHg at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months, respectively. In the groups of patients aged 55-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years, SBP reductions at 3 months compared with baseline were - 30.3 ± 9.4, - 32.4 ± 9.7, - 32.5 ± 10.7, and - 28.9 ± 9.6 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSION: This post-hoc analysis of the observational ARBALET study showed that indapamide/amlodipine SPC was associated with significant reductions in BP and high rates of target BP achievement in a broad age range of patients with ISH treated in routine clinical practice. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN40812831.

Impact of simultaneous management of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia with ACE inhibitors and statins on cardiovascular outcomes in the Brisighella Heart Study: A 8-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate the long-term effect of simultaneous treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and statins on the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and other clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We considered data from a subset of Brisighella Heart Study (BHS) participants who were consecutively evaluated in three epidemiological surveys between 2012 and 2020. We excluded normotensive subjects and individuals with a low calculated 10-year CVD risk, hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs different from ACE inhibitors and patients who changed antihypertensive medications during follow-up. The remaining participants were divided into four groups depending on whether they were treated with (I) perindopril ± amlodipine without statin treatment (N. 132), (II) perindopril ± amlodipine and atorvastatin (N. 132), (III) an ACE inhibitor other than perindopril ± a calcium-channel blocker without statin therapy (N. 133), (IV) an ACE inhibitor other than perindopril ± a calcium-channel blocker and statin therapy (N. 145). The long-term (8 years) effects of the different combined treatment were compared among the pre-defined groups. Over the follow-up period of 8 years, the proportion of subjects who developed MACE, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperuricemia, and the proportion of subjects needing for the intensification of antihypertensive treatment to improve blood pressure control were statistically different among the predefined groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with ACE inhibitors and statins (especially atorvastatin) in hypertensive patients seems to significantly reduce the risk of developing CVD in comparison with treatment with ACE inhibitors alone.

Cardiopulmonary exercise test-based assessment of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the blood pressure response to exercise in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) on cardiopulmonary function and blood pressure response to exercise during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). METHODS: A total of 265 AMI patients were treated with either perindopril or S/V within 24 hours of admission. CPET was completed for all patients before discharge. There were 182 cases in the perindopril group and 83 cases in the S/V group. RESULTS: The proportion of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) was higher in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (10.8% vs 1.6%, X2 = 11.148, P = .001). The resting heart rate (HR), resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and warm-up DBP were lower in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (P < .05). The resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 9.0 mmHg lower (115.7 ± 17.5 vs 106.7 ± 15.0, P < .001), the SBP during warm-up was 9.5 mmHg lower (124.8 ± 23.7 vs 115.3 ± 22.5,P = .002), the SBP at the anaerobic threshold (AT) was 10.5 mmHg lower (135.3 ± 24.8 vs 127.1 ± 25.1,P = .021),the SBP at max watts was 11.5 mmHg lower (148.9 ± 26.4 vs 137.4 ± 26.4,P = .001), and the SBP during one-minute recovery was 12.3 mmHg lower (146.5 ± 27.1 vs 134.2 ± 24.4, P = .001)in the S/V group than in the perindopril group. The S/V group had a higher oxygen ventilation equivalent and carbon dioxide ventilation equivalent (VE/VCO2) at AT and a lower oxygen uptake-work rate relationship during max watts (P < .05). The differences in the oxygen pulse, stroke volume, peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), and VE/VCO2 slope were not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with S/V was able to reduce the exercise blood pressure in patients with AMI during hospitalization, but did not significantly improve the VO2 peak, VE/VCO2 slope, or exercise tolerance.

Protective effects of perindopril against indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage through modulation of DDAH-1/ADMA and ACE-2/ANG-(1-7) signaling pathways.

Indomethacin is a widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; however, its clinical utility is accompanied by serious adverse reactions including peptic ulcers. The current study aims to investigate the protective potential of perindopril against indomethacin-induced gastric injury in rats. Perindopril (4 mg/kg) was administered orally for 7 days and indomethacin (60 mg/kg, single oral dose) was administered on the 7th day, 1 h after perindopril administration. Pantoprazole was used as a standard agent. Ulcer index (UI), preventive index ratio (PI), histopathological examination, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers were investigated. Perindopril significantly decreased UI while increased PI and counteracted histopathological aberrations induced by indomethacin. It alleviated indomethacin-induced oxidative stress by lowering NO while increasing GSH content and superoxide dismutase activity. Perindopril significantly downregulated TNF-α and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), while significantly upregulated COX-2, PGE-2, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-1 (DDAH-1), ANG-(1-7), and ACE-2 expression. Together, these findings suggest the gastroprotective effects of perindopril through modulation of DDAH-1/ADMA and ACE-2/ANG-(1-7) signaling.HIGHLIGHTSPerindopril attenuated gastric histopathological damage.It increased GSH content and SOD activity while decreased NO content.It modulated gastric ADMA and DDAH-1 activity.It reduced TNF-α, while increased COX-2 and PGE-2 expression.It upregulated ACE-2 activity and ANG-(1-7) protein expression.