Dopamine increases risky choice while D2 blockade shortens decision time.

Dopamine is crucially involved in decision-making and overstimulation within dopaminergic pathways can lead to impulsive behaviour, including a desire to take risks and reduced deliberation before acting. These behavioural changes are side effects of treatment with dopaminergic drugs in Parkinson disease, but their likelihood of occurrence is difficult to predict and may be influenced by the individual's baseline endogenous dopamine state, and indeed correlate with sensation-seeking personality traits. We here collected data on a standard gambling task in healthy volunteers given either placebo, 2.5 mg of the dopamine antagonist haloperidol or 100/25 mg of the dopamine precursor levodopa in a within-subject design. We found an increase in risky choices on levodopa. Choices were, however, made faster on haloperidol with no effect of levodopa on deliberation time. Shortened deliberation times on haloperidol occurred in low sensation-seekers only, suggesting a correlation between sensation-seeking personality trait and baseline dopamine levels. We hypothesise that levodopa increases risk-taking behaviour via overstimulation at both D1 and D2 receptor level, while a single low dose of haloperidol, as previously reported (Frank and O'Reilly 2006), may block D2 receptors pre- and post-synaptically and may paradoxically lead to higher striatal dopamine acting on remaining striatal D1 receptors, causing speedier decision without influencing risk tolerance. These effects could also fit with a recently proposed computational model of the basal ganglia (Moeller and Bogacz 2019; Moeller et al. 2021). Furthermore, our data suggest that the actual dopaminergic drug effect may be dependent on the individual's baseline dopamine state, which may influence our therapeutic decision as clinicians in the future.

Mental rotation and working memory in musicians' dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Mental rotation of body parts engages cortical-subcortical areas that are actually involved in the execution of a movement. Musicians' dystonia is a type of focal hand dystonia that is grouped together with writer's cramp under the rubric of "occupational dystonia", but it is unclear to which extent these two disorders share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Previous research has demonstrated patients with writer's cramp to have deficits in mental rotation of body parts. It is unknown whether patients with musicians' dystonia would display similar deficits, reinforcing the concept of shared pathophysiology. METHODS: Eight patients with musicians' dystonia and eight healthy musicians matched for age, gender and musical education, performed a number of tasks assessing mental rotation of body parts and objects as well as verbal and spatial working memories abilities. RESULTS: There were no differences between patients and healthy musicians as to accuracy and reaction times in any of the tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with musicians' dystonia have intact abilities in mentally rotating body parts, suggesting that this disorder relies on a highly selective disruption of movement planning and execution that manifests only upon playing a specific instrument. We further demonstrated that mental rotation of body parts and objects engages, at least partially, different cognitive networks.

"Atypical" atypical parkinsonism: Critical appraisal of a cohort.

BACKGROUND: Atypical parkinsonian conditions such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) comprise 10-15% of parkinsonian syndromes. Misdiagnosis with Parkinson disease (PD) and within the entities is common, given the absence of reliable biomarkers. However a correct diagnosis is not only important in clinical practice, but also crucial for any trial attempting to identify biomarkers or new treatments. METHODS: Consecutive patients, who were referred to our tertiary center with a diagnosis of a particular AP were included and the medical records were reviewed retrospectively. We applied each set of current diagnostic research criteria to the respective cohort to see which features fit in and if there are any additional atypical features "outside" the classic definition. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were recruited between January 2013 and May 2015 clinically presenting with one of the following phenotypes: 14 MSA, 24 PSP, 19 CBS and 12 DLB. Up to 49% showed additional "atypical" features and approximately 10% eventually received an alternative diagnosis, in half of whom this being based on genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: In a subset of our patients, despite the final diagnosis of an AP being maintained, there were additional "atypical" features. It remains to be seen if these reflect the clinical heterogeneity of APs, or should prompt a search for an alternative diagnosis. The search for biomarkers is more likely to be successful in homogenous groups of "typical" patients, hence the importance of recognizing "atypical" features.