Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dysphagia ; 38(1): 446-456, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35841456

RESUMEN

In this study, we aimed to identify the factors related to esophageal impaction following button battery (BB) ingestion in children. PilBouTox, a prospective multicentric observational cohort study, was conducted from French Poison Control Centers between June 1, 2016 and May 31, 2018. Children (0-12 years old) with BB ingestion were included. After ingestion, patients were monitored for 21 days or more if they remained symptomatic (maximum 1 year). Causes of ingestion, clinical manifestations, medical management, and the outcomes were recorded. In total, 415 patients were included; among them, 35 had esophageal impaction and 14 had severe complications or died. Seven symptoms were closely related (relative risk (RR) > 30) to esophageal impaction: anorexia, drooling, dyspnea, fever, hemodynamic instability, pallor, and pain. Furthermore, BBs > 15 mm were related to esophageal impaction (RR = 19, CI95% [4.1; 88]). The absence of initial symptoms was a protective factor for esophageal impaction (RR = 0.013, CI95% [0.002; 0.1]). Nine symptoms were closely related (RR > 30) to major effects and death: dyspnea, cough, dysphagia, drooling, fever, hemodynamic instability, pain, pallor, and vomiting. Seven symptoms were related to esophageal impaction and their rapid recognition could help to ensure that the patient is taken to a health care facility. Nine factors were related to the major effects of BB ingestion. We recommended an X-ray as soon as possible to determine the position of the BB.Trial Registry: Clinical Trial ID: NCT03708250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03708250.


Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Sialorrea , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Estudios Prospectivos , Palidez/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ingestión de Alimentos , Progresión de la Enfermedad
2.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 37(9): 901-913, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36040638

RESUMEN

Concerns have been raised about early vs. later impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behavior. However, data remain sparse to date. We investigated all calls for intentional drug or other toxic ingestions to the eight Poison Control Centers in France between 1st January 2018 and 31st May 2022. Data were extracted from the French National Database of Poisonings. Calls during the study period were analyzed using time trends and time series analyses with SARIMA models (based on the first two years). Breakpoints were determined using Chow test. These analyses were performed together with examination of age groups (≤ 11, 12-24, 25-64, ≥ 65 years) and gender effects when possible. Over the studied period, 66,589 calls for suicide attempts were received. Overall, there was a downward trend from 2018, which slowed down in October 2019 and was followed by an increase from November 2020. Number of calls observed during the COVID period were above what was expected. However, important differences were found according to age and gender. The increase in calls from mid-2020 was particularly observed in young females, while middle-aged adults showed a persisting decrease. An increase in older-aged people was observed from mid-2019 and persisted during the pandemic. The pandemic may therefore have exacerbated a pre-existing fragile situation in adolescents and old-aged people. This study emphasizes the rapidly evolving situation regarding suicidal behaviour during the pandemic, the possibility of age and gender differences in impact, and the value of having access to real-time information to monitor suicidal acts.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Intento de Suicidio
4.
Arch Pediatr ; 30(7): 501-504, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The health and safety hazards related to button batteries (BB) have been extensively studied, highlighting that the presence of a button battery in the esophagus is a life-threatening emergency. However, complications related to bowel BB are poorly evaluated and not well known. The objective of this review of the literature was to describe severe cases of BB that have passed the pylorus. CASE REPORT: This case, from the PilBouTox cohort, is the first report of small-bowel occlusion following ingestion of an LR44 BB (diameter: 11.4 mm) by a 7-month-old infant with a history of intestinal resections. In this case, the BB was ingested without a witness. The initial presentation mimicked acute gastroenteritis evolving into hypovolemic shock. An X-ray revealed a foreign body stuck in the small bowel causing an intestinal occlusion and local necrosis without perforation. The patient's history of intestinal stenosis and intestinal surgery were the contributing factor of impaction. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: The review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The research was conducted on September 12, 2022 through five database and the U.S. Poison Control Center website. An additional 12 severe cases of intestinal or colonic injury after ingestion of a single BB were identified. Of these, 11 were related to small BBs (< 15 mm) that impacted Meckel's diverticulum and one was related to postoperative stenosis. CONCLUSION: In view of the findings, the indications for digestive endoscopy for extraction of a BB in the stomach should include a history of intestinal stenosis or intestinal surgery so as to avoid delayed intestinal perforation or occlusion and prolonged hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Obstrucción Intestinal , Lactante , Humanos , Píloro , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Esófago/lesiones , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Ingestión de Alimentos
5.
Toxicol Res (Camb) ; 11(3): 529-536, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35782643

RESUMEN

Aldicarb, a carbamate pesticide banned in France since 2008, represents a persistent risk of human poisoning. There is no up-to-date picture of aldicarb intentional poisonings associated to detailed diagnosis and clinical management of cases to evaluate the effect of its ban on intoxication risk reduction, including suicide. This retrospective epidemiological study describes cases of suicidal intoxication from the Hauts-de-France region between 2012 and 2021 and illustrates this situation through one analytically documented case. 60 cases were collected, mostly presenting a pathognomonic symptomatology. Thirty-five victims presented a muscarinic syndrome (58.3%), 14 a nicotinic syndrome (23.3%), and 37 a central nervous system impairment (61.7%). Hospitalization was necessary for 44 cases (73.3%), with 2 fatal evolutions. Diagnosis was based on the blood cholinesterase activities. Among the 25 cases with toxicology results, 45.8% presented a moderate decrease of acetylcholinesterase activity, whereas 87.5% presented a strong decrease of butyrylcholinesterase activity. Blood or urine detection of aldicarb and its metabolites may be considered in therapeutic management, although their quantification is unlikely to change the emergency medical care. Our study updates epidemiology of aldicarb poisoning at a regional level, highlighting a persisting health threatening situation with banned pesticides. More than 65% of national cases occurred in this agricultural area, aldicarb remaining available from storage of previously purchased products. Robust evidence is presented that acute poisoning is an ongoing major global public health challenge. There is a need for continued international efforts in risk reduction, knowledge, and information strategies.

6.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(8): 947-953, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35311427

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the number of patients managed by poison control centres (PCCs) has increased without a proportional increase in the number of physicians. To improve efficiency without neglecting patient follow-up, some PCCs have begun using text messages. We evaluated the difference in response rates between text messaging and traditional telephone follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric, non-randomised cohort study was conducted using data from calls made by the New Aquitaine PCC between February 27, 2019, and March 31, 2019. Patients were contacted up to three times by a phone call or short message service (SMS). RESULTS: For the analysis, 823 patients were included. At the end of follow-up, the response rates were similar in the phone call and SMS group (94 vs. 94%; p = 0.76) with median [interquartile range] response times of 0 min [0; 27 min] and 29 min [6; 120 min], respectively. The response rates did not differ in subgroups stratified according to sex, self-poisoning vs. relative response, age class, and solicitation during working hours vs. outside of working hours (all p > 0.5). Moreover, health practitioners required 2.4-fold more time to call than to send text messages (p < 0.001), and all practitioners were satisfied or very satisfied with text messaging implementation. CONCLUSION: Patients had good adherence to text messages. Text messages are easy to use, rapid, and allow the physician to easily prioritise follow-up without occupying the emergency line. Additionally, the costs of installation and maintenance are low for text message systems; these low costs facilitate the implementation of such services in various medical situations.


Asunto(s)
Teléfono Celular , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Estudios de Cohortes , Comunicación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teléfono
7.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 59(11): 1027-1030, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33733968

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Misuse/abuse of pregabalin is increasing worldwide. French Poison Control Centers (PCCs) recently received several unusual calls regarding the recreational use of pregabalin in adolescents. This study aims to describe this new and specific population of pregabalin misusers. METHODS: We extracted all cases of pregabalin intentional exposures reported to the French National Database of Poisonings (FNDP) from 2004 to 2020. We compared the proportion of recreational exposure to pregabalin between adolescents (10-17 years) and adults (>18 years). We reviewed all cases of pregabalin recreational exposures in adolescent in order to describe the characteristics of this population. RESULTS: During the study period, 382 cases of acute intentional exposure to pregabalin were reported in adolescents and 1188 in adults, 94/382 (24.6%) and 43/1188 (3.6%) were pregabalin recreational use, respectively (p < .0001). Almost all cases of pregabalin recreational use in adolescent were reported from 2018 (86/94; 91%). Most of those adolescent patients were males (male/female ratio - 5.3:1) and the median age was 15 years (range: 11-17.8). They were homeless or living in migrant shelters in most of the cases (73/90, 81%). Two-third of these exposures (62/94; 66%) involved other toxicant(s) than pregabalin. Most of the patients remains asymptomatic (10/94; 11%), or developed minor to moderate neurological symptoms (76/94; 81%). Eight developed severe symptoms (8/94; 8%) including coma (5/8) or generalized seizures (2/8). Five patients (5/8) required oro-tracheal intubation. No fatality was reported. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a sharp increase in pregabalin recreational use in adolescents in France. It should lead to prevention campaigns, targeted at the population at risk described in this study.


Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Drogas Ilícitas , Pregabalina , Uso Recreativo de Drogas/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología
8.
J Med Entomol ; 58(6): 2146-2153, 2021 11 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224562

RESUMEN

In the world, the impact of environmental conditions on the number of scorpion events was evaluated in North Africa,Middle East, and the Amazonian region but not in Europe. In mainland France, scorpion species described are Buthus occitanus (Amoreux, 1789), Belisarius xambeui (Simon, 1879) and 4 Euscorpiidae: Euscorpius concinnus (Koch, 1837), Euscorpius italicus (Herbst, 1800), Euscorpius tergestinus (Koch, 1837), and Tetratrichobothrius flavicaudis (De Geer, 1778). We aimed to describe the impact of environmental conduction on the number of scorpion events. For this, a retrospective multi-center study was conducted with data from the French poison control centers files about scorpion events between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2020. During the study period, 975 incoming calls for scorpion events were recorded and 574 were related to scorpions native to mainland France and Corsica: B. occitanus (n = 86), Euscorpiidae species (n = 222), B. xambeui (n = 1), and undetermined species (n = 265). Cases were mostly reported along the Mediterranean coast, along rivers, and in cities with a trading port. The number of scorpion events was linked to the rivers' water level, rivers' flow, temperature, sunshine, and pluviometry (P < 0.05 for all variables). B. occitanus need warmest and driest environment than Euscorpiidae spp. A link between the severity of the envenoming and climatic condition or seasonality was not demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Ambiente , Picaduras de Escorpión/etiología , Escorpiones/fisiología , Animales , Francia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estaciones del Año
9.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 59(9): 832-839, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576261

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on French Poison Control Centre (PCC) call characteristics. METHODS: Reported cases of xenobiotic exposures from 1 March to 30 April in 2018, 2019, and 2020 were extracted from the French National Database of Poisonings. The collected data included call, patient, and exposure characteristics for both general calls and for calls involving sentinel xenobiotic categories related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2020 exposures were compared to 2018-2019 exposures by using simple logistic models in order to provide effect size with odds ratios. RESULTS: From March to April 2020, 32,182 exposures were reported to French PCCs with an overall increase of 5.6% compared to exposures in the same time frame in 2018-2019. A similar increase in calls was observed in non-epidemic and epidemic COVID-19 areas with an increase in calls from the public (+13.6%) while calls from health-professionals decreased (-7.5%). Despite the increase in exposures, the incidence of symptomatic exposures remained stable (-0.4%) with a decrease in severity (moderate/severe -17.2%). A significant increase in exposures to home cleaning products containing biocides, essential oils, and alcohol-based hand sanitizers (odds ratio >1.3, p < .0001) was observed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic altered calls to French PCCs with a small increase in calls during the study period and changes in the pattern of exposure. These changes possibly reflected the indirect consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic i.e., limited access to primary care, fear of contracting COVID-19 and anxiety related to home isolation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Intoxicación/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 58(3): 201-203, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31169038

RESUMEN

Context: During the re-approval process of glyphosate in Europe, it was mentioned that glyphosate-based products (GBF) were more toxic than glyphosate alone. This phenomenon was attributed to the surfactants and among them, polyethoxylated tallowamine (POEA) has been suspected to significantly contribute to the toxicity of glyphosate products. In animal data acute oral toxicity of POEA has been suggested to be greater than glyphosate toxicity in animal studies. There are no data, however, comparing the clinical signs and severity of acute human poisoning with tallowamine-containing GBF (TA) and non-tallowamine-containing GBF (NTA). The aim of this study was to compare the severity of oral poisoning between TA and NTA cases, reported to the French Poison Control Centres (PCC) over 7 years.Methods: This is a retrospective study of cases of oral exposure to GBF reported to French PCCs between January 1st, 2008 and December 12th, 2014. The formulation of every GBF was reviewed using the PCC national database of products and compositions, to identify cases involving TA, NTA, or GBF with unknown co-formulants.Results: Between 2008 and 2014, 1362 cases of GBF ingestion were registered in the PCC national database of poisoning cases. Among them, 429 were symptomatic acute cases of ingestion of GBF. There were 235 exposures to TA, 105 to NTA, and 89 to unknown GBF. There were more severe cases in the TA group than in the NTA group (p = 0.037).Discussion: The present study shows that POEA rather than other co-formulants leads to more severe symptoms in those patients ingesting GBF. The acute toxicity of POEA might be explained by its irritating properties; in experimental studies, it caused skin irritation and severe eye and mucous membranes irritation.Conclusion: In this study, severe respiratory symptoms were also more frequently reported in the TA group. The surfactant properties of POEA are likely to cause aspiration pneumonitis which is a plausible explanation for the respiratory failure complicating severe GBF poisoning cases.


Asunto(s)
Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/envenenamiento , Tensoactivos/envenenamiento , Adulto , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/envenenamiento , Herbicidas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tensoactivos/administración & dosificación , Glifosato
11.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 34(2): 290-295, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498916

RESUMEN

Methadone has been prescribed in France as opioid substitution therapy as a syrup formulation since 1995 and as capsules since 2008. Following two publications showing on a national scale the high risk of methadone poisoning in children and the lack of difference in poisoning severity between both methadone formulations, French health authorities chose to benefit from the experience acquired by the network of French poison centres concerning poisoning by this substitution medication. The aim of this study was to identify and compare the main circumstances of methadone exposure collected by a poison centre on a national scale over a period of 7 years. Retrospective descriptive study of cases of methadone exposure was compiled by the network of French poison centres between 15 October 2010 and 15 October 2017. Analysis of 1415 files revealed two major circumstances: 47% misuse and 41% suicide attempts. Severity scores evaluated according to the PSS were higher for misuse than for suicidal behaviour, despite the supposed ingested dose being statistically higher in the latter. The results also confirmed the lack of significant difference in methadone exposure between both of the formulations (syrup and capsules). This series of methadone exposure on a national scale is one of the largest compiled series in international medical literature. On the one hand, it highlights the severity of methadone poisoning (in suicidal behaviour and even more so in misuse behaviour), and on the other hand, it confirms that the capsule formulation does not seem to represent a higher risk than the syrup formulation.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Metadona/envenenamiento , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
12.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 58(11): 1050-1057, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134691

RESUMEN

Context: Today, immunotherapy with Fab or F(ab')2 fragments is considered as a gold standard treatment for patients bitten by vipers. We compared the efficiency of two antivenoms, Viperfav® and Viperatab®, in mainland France in 2017-2018 with data provided by the French poison control centre (PCC).Methods: Patients with a moderate (2a and 2b) or severe (3) envenomation after a European viper bite and treated with immunotherapy were included and the markers chosen were the risk of post-antivenom treatment worsening, duration of hospital stay and persistent functional discomfort on day 15. Statistical studies were based on multivariate data analysis.Results: Two hundred and ninety-seven cases were recorded. One hundred and eighty-two (61.3%) patients received Viperfav® and 115 (38.7%) received Viperatab®. Compared to Viperfav®, use of Viperatab® significantly increased the risk of post-antivenom treatment worsening (OR* 12.05; 95%CI [3.11; 46.70]; p < .001). No significant difference between these antivenoms was recorded with respect to the duration of hospital stay and persistent functional discomfort on day 15. Viperfav® and Viperatab® have a similar tolerance (p > .21). Otherwise, duration of hospitalisation was significantly increased by a delay of immunotherapy infusion of more than 12 h (OR 2.70; 95%CI [1.45-5.06]; p = .002) or a preventive administration of LMWH (OR 6.55; 95%CI [1.58-27.13]; p=.02).Discussion: While Viperfav® and Viperatab® have a similar tolerance, our data show that Viperatab® was associated with a higher risk of post-antivenom treatment worsening compared to Viperfav®. Furthermore, this study confirms that the antivenom should be used as soon as possible. Indeed, patients receiving the immunotherapy infusion from the grade 2b presented significantly more frequent exacerbated symptoms (OR 3.99; 95%CI [1.16-13.73]; p=.028) after the antivenom infusion compared to grade 2a group.Conclusions: Whereas no significant difference between these antivenoms was recorded with respect to the duration of hospital stay and persistent functional discomfort on day 15, use of Viperatab®, compared to Viperfav®, significantly increased the risk of post-antivenom treatment worsening (OR* 12.05; 95%CI [3.11; 46.70]; p < .001). Taken together, these data show that Viperfav® is the treatment of choice for the management of snake bites in France.


Asunto(s)
Antivenenos/uso terapéutico , Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Mordeduras de Serpientes/terapia , Viperidae , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Antivenenos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Mordeduras de Serpientes/complicaciones , Mordeduras de Serpientes/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
13.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(3): 279-298, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32540815

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The French national authority for health (Haute autorité de santé: HAS) and the French clinical toxicology society (Société de toxicologie clinique: STC) received a formal request from the French ministry for heath to elaborate recommendations for the screening of environmental overexposure to inorganic arsenic (iAs), for the medical management of overexposed patients and for the medical surveillance of exposed population. To allow these recommendations, preliminary literature retrieval and analysis were performed for identifying validated indicators of both exposure and early effects of iAs and their levels in the general population living in France. METHODS: Evaluations of inorganic arsenic toxicity conducted by national or international health agencies during the last 3 decades were all examined and analyzed. These evaluations were completed by literature retrieval through Medline and Scopus from January 2016 to December 2019. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The best biomonitoring indicator for iAs exposure is the sum of urine iAs, monmomethylarsonic acid (MMA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) concentrations (SAs). The upper limit of confidence interval of the 95th percentile of the distribution of this parameter in the general adult population living in France is 10 µg/g of creatinine, and is recommended as the limit value for the definition of overexposure. In less than 12 year-old children specific limit values are required, but not yet available. In their absence, SAs should exceed both 10 µg/g creatinine and 11 µg/L to be considered as indicating a probable overexposure to iAs. There are no useful biological indicators of iAs early effects. Non carcinogenic skin effects of inorganic arsenic (hyperpigmentation and keratosis) should be considered as the earliest deleterious effects of repeated environmental iAs exposure.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Arsénico/diagnóstico , Arsénico/análisis , Monitoreo Biológico/métodos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Adulto , Intoxicación por Arsénico/sangre , Monitoreo Biológico/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Factibilidad , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido
14.
Ann Intensive Care ; 10(1): 157, 2020 Nov 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33226502

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis. METHODS: A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS: The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.

15.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 57(5): 362-367, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30449187

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical consequences of risperidone medication errors in children of less than 13 years and to estimate a clinically relevant toxic dose. METHODS: All cases of risperidone medication errors managed by French Poison Centres from 2001 to 2012 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were a delay of at least 2 hours between ingestion and request to the FPC in asymptomatic children, an ingested dose above two-fold the maximal daily dose for children above 5 years or any symptomatic patient at the time of first contact. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty cases met our criteria. Median age was 8 years (range 0.9-12) and 28.1% were aged 5 years or less. Causes of the error were an incorrect dose in treated children (84.2%) or a dose given to a wrong child (15.8%). The median ingested dose was 0.1 mg/kg or 3.3-fold the maximum recommended dose. Overall, 59 children had no symptoms, 95 experienced minor symptoms and six moderate symptoms. Somnolence/sedation was the most common (73.3%). Of the 17 children who developed extrapyramidal disorders, all had minor or moderate symptoms and only five required a symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone medication errors in children cause minimal effects. Somnolence and mild to moderate extrapyramidal reactions were the main features of toxicity, and significant cardiac or other neurological features were not observed. No case with severe toxicity was noted. At home surveillance can be proposed for children exposed to a dose ≤0.15 mg/kg.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/envenenamiento , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Errores de Medicación , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Risperidona/envenenamiento , Somnolencia , Factores de Edad , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Risperidona/administración & dosificación
16.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 25(4): e1-e8, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29240570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the ingestion of button batteries is an infrequent situation, it leads to a significant risk of causing serious damage. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to describe all the cases of button battery ingestion recorded by the French Poison Control Centers over 16 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the cases of button battery ingestion were recorded from 1 January 1999 to the end of June 2015, analysed (age, sex, number of ingested button batteries, clinical signs and treatments) and graded for severity according to the poisoning severity score. RESULTS: The incidence of button batteries ingestions was constant over the 16-year period, with an average of 266±98.5 cases per year and a total of 4030 cases. Nevertheless, 21 cases were severe and two deaths occurred. Interestingly, for the two patients who died, the battery was stuck in the oesophagus and they presented anorexia and/or dysphagia, abdominal pain and fever and in one case, a melena 3 weeks after ingestion. Importantly, these symptoms were observed even if the battery was expelled in one fatal case. CONCLUSION: Ingestions of button batteries still occur and may cause serious damage, especially in children, and if the button battery is stuck in the oesophagus as it might cause severe symptoms. Patients who have ingested a button battery must be directed to the emergency department for medical evaluation, even if the button battery has been expelled from the body and even more if gastrointestinal symptoms are present.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Ingestión de Alimentos , Suministros de Energía Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cuerpos Extraños/epidemiología , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
17.
Presse Med ; 45(10): 947-953, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27546304

RESUMEN

The ingestion of disc battery is a common problem in children and current treatment may be sometime inadequate. Ingested button batteries have the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Ingestion of button batteries has been seen with increasing frequency over the last decade, particularly for children aged younger than 6 years. If most cases of disc battery ingestion run uneventful courses, however, harmful outcomes are more common with ingestion of lithium batteries (3V) with a diameter greater than or equal to 16 mm. These young children have to benefit from a chest radiograph within 2hours which follow the ingestion. If the battery impacts in the esophagus, emergency endoscopic management is necessary. We report the case of one young child died followed an unknown lithium disk-battery ingestion complicated with an aorto-œsophageal fistula. We propose a protocol of specific coverage for patients aged younger than 6 years old.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Enfermedades de la Aorta/etiología , Fístula Esofágica/etiología , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Fístula Vascular/etiología , Enfermedades de la Aorta/terapia , Preescolar , Ingestión de Alimentos , Fístula Esofágica/terapia , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Humanos , Fístula Vascular/terapia
19.
Therapie ; 58(4): 367-70, 2003.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14679677

RESUMEN

A retrospective study (1995-2000) of reports of cases of metoclopramide poisoning collected at the Lille poison control centre (184 phone calls) shows the frequent occurrence of acute dystonia in children (81 cases). These spectacular extrapyramidal symptoms consist of abnormal movements (31 cases), local hypertonia (30 cases), acute dyskinesia (17 cases), general hypertonia (16 cases) and oculogyric crisis (13 cases). There is no dose-effect correlation and sex has no influence on the occurrence of neurological symptoms. Medical management is simple surveillance or symptomatic therapy (a sedative drug and/or anti-parkinsonian therapy and/or a gastrointestinal adsorbent). Hospitalisation was needed in only 9.1% of cases. Providing better information to physicians about metoclopramide adverse effects and their medical management should allow a reduction in the number of unnecessary hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Dopamina/envenenamiento , Distonía/inducido químicamente , Metoclopramida/envenenamiento , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA