RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many adrenal tumors are deemed radiologically indeterminate and surgically removed. Adrenal tissue, like parathyroid glands, exhibits near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) properties. This study was designed to investigate the potential of NIRAF to differentiate benign versus malignant adrenal tumors. METHODS: Patients undergoing adrenalectomy between October 2021 and May 2023 were prospectively studied. Adrenalectomy specimens were inspected with NIRAF imaging. Specimen autofluorescence (AF) characteristics were recorded. Comparisons were made between different tumor types and a logistic regression model was constructed to differentiate benign versus malignant tumors. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify an optimal AF threshold differentiating benign versus malignant tumors. RESULTS: A total of 108 adrenal specimens were examined: adrenocortical adenomas/other benign lesions (n = 72), pheochromocytomas (n = 18), adrenocortical neoplasms of uncertain behavior (n = 4), and malignant tumors (n = 14). A significant difference in normalized AF intensity was identified when comparing adrenocortical adenomas (3.08 times background) with pheochromocytomas (1.95, p = 0.001) and malignant tumors (1.11, p < 0.0001). The Area Under the Curve differentiating benign vs malignant tumors was 0.87, with an optimal normalized AF threshold at 1.93. CONCLUSIONS: Different adrenal pathologies exhibit diverse AF properties. These findings suggest a potential intraoperative utility of NIRAF in predicting benign versus malignant nature for radiologically indeterminate adrenal tumors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Imagen Óptica , Feocromocitoma , Humanos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/patología , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Feocromocitoma/patología , Feocromocitoma/cirugía , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Imagen Óptica/métodos , Adrenalectomía , Adulto , Curva ROC , Adenoma Corticosuprarrenal/patología , Adenoma Corticosuprarrenal/cirugía , Adenoma Corticosuprarrenal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/patología , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/diagnóstico por imagen , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: 99mTC-sestamibi scintigraphy (SPECT-CT) is a common imaging modality for parathyroid localization in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Prior studies have suggested that the cellular composition of parathyroid adenomas influences SPECT-CT imaging results. Other biochemical and anatomical factors may also play a role in false negative results. Therefore, after controlling for confounding variables, we sought to determine whether the histologic composition of parathyroid adenomas is associated to SPECT-CT results in patients with single gland disease causing PHPT. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with PHPT due to confirmed single gland disease was performed over a 2-y period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was done between patients with positive and negative SPECT-CT results with regard to demographical, biochemical, and anatomical characteristics followed by blinded pathologic examination of cell composition in the matched pairs. RESULTS: Five hundred forty two patients underwent routine four gland exploration and 287 (53%) patients were found to have a single adenoma. Of those, 26% had a negative SPECT-CT result. There were significant differences between groups with regards to biochemical profile, gland location, and gland size. All of which became nonsignificant after propensity score matching. Adenomas were primarily composed of chief cells, with no difference between groups (95% versus 97%, P = 0.30). In the positive SPECT-CT group, chief cells were the dominant cell type in 68% of the cases, followed by mixed type (13%), oxyphil cells (12%), and clear cells (7%). This was similar to the negative SPECT-CT group (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: While certain patient's clinical characteristics are associated with SPECT-CT imaging results, histologic cell type is not significantly associated.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/etiología , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/complicaciones , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/complicaciones , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Glándulas Paratiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Tecnecio Tc 99m Sestamibi , Adenoma/complicaciones , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) is an emerging technology with the potential to predict and improve clinical outcomes including adverse events, based on complex pattern recognition. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after bariatric surgery have an incidence of 0.1% but carry significant morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have investigated these events using traditional statistical methods, however, studies reporting ML for MACE prediction in bariatric surgery remain limited. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare MACE prediction models in bariatric surgery using traditional statistical methods and ML. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the MBSAQIP database, from 2015 to 2019. A binary-outcome MACE prediction model was generated using three different modeling methods: (1) main-effects-only logistic regression, (2) neural network with a single hidden layer, and (3) XGBoost model with a max depth of 3. The same set of predictor variables and random split of the total data (50/50) were used to train and validate each model. Overall performance was compared based on the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 755,506 patients were included, of which 0.1% experienced MACE. Of the total sample, 79.6% were female, 47.8% had hypertension, 26.2% had diabetes, 23.7% had hyperlipidemia, 8.4% used tobacco within 1 year, 1.9% had previous percutaneous cardiac intervention, 1.2% had a history of myocardial infarction, 1.1% had previous cardiac surgery, and 0.6% had renal insufficiency. The AUC for the three different MACE prediction models was: 0.790 for logistic regression, 0.798 for neural network and 0.787 for XGBoost. While the AUC implies similar discriminant function, the risk prediction histogram for the neural network shifted in a smoother fashion. CONCLUSION: The ML models developed achieved good discriminant function in predicting MACE. ML can help clinicians with patient selection and identify individuals who may be at elevated risk for MACE after bariatric surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Pronóstico , Aprendizaje Automático , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have an increased risk of thyroid nodular disease. Previous studies demonstrated that screening thyroid ultrasound (US) will allow detection of nodules in 38% and thyroid cancer in 2.6% of patients. The aim of this study is to define the value of serial US evaluation at identifying disease progression in patients with FAP. METHODS: Retrospective review from 2008 to 2023 at a single referral center. All patients with FAP and screening thyroid US were included. Patient demographics, initial US characteristics, follow-up regarding the development of new nodules and cancer were assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients underwent screening. Fifty percent were male. Median age at first screening was 38 year old. Eighty percent underwent longitudinal follow-up for a median length of 7 years. At initial screening, 169 patients (30%) had nodules. For patients with normal baseline US, 14% developed a nodule overtime. A total of 20 patients (3.6%) were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. The cumulative incidence of initial and subsequent cancer was 4% by 5 years and 6% by 10 years, while the cumulative incidence of thyroid nodules was 40% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, ongoing longitudinal screening is warranted for patients with FAP as they are prone to thyroid cancer and nodule development overtime even when presenting with a baseline normal US. Additionally, these data demonstrate a slow development of thyroid cancer from a normal US, thus it is reasonable to consider selectively extending the screening interval for this population.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/epidemiología , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nódulo Tiroideo/epidemiología , Nódulo Tiroideo/patología , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven , Incidencia , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the past years, there has been increasing evidence that supports the use of permanent mesh in contaminated wounds. Given this increased evidence, the indications to opt for slowly absorbable "biosynthetic" prostheses have been questioned. To address this, we compared the outcomes of slowly absorbable mesh in contaminated cases in a well-matched multicentric cohort. METHODS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database was queried for patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair in Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-III operations (2013-2022). We compared demographics, hernia characteristics, and postoperative outcomes among types of mesh. We used propensity score matching to adjust for sex, diabetes, body mass index, smoking status, and operative time between mesh groups. Patients within other CDC classes and those with mesh positioned elsewhere than retro-rectus/preperitoneal space were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients were included in the analysis. Slowly absorbable synthetic mesh (SA) was utilized in only 7% of the cases, while permanent (P) and biologic (B) mesh in 77% and 16%, respectively. After matching, 255 patients were studied. There was no difference in surgical site occurrence (8% SA, 16% P, 10% B, p = 0.27), surgical site infection (20% SA, 17% P, 12% B p = 0.54), surgical site occurrence requiring intervention (18% SA, 13% P, 14% B p = 0.72), readmission (12% SA, 14% P, 12% B, p = 0.90), or reoperation (8% SA, 2% P, 4% B, p = 0.14) at 30 days. In patients with 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in recurrence among groups (20% SA, 26% P, 24% B p = 0.90). CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, SA has comparable outcomes to other types of mesh, particularly when an optimal retro-rectus repair is performed.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Herniorrafia , Prótesis e Implantes , Índice de Masa Corporal , Hernia Ventral/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare disease with overlapping symptoms of broad foregut pathology. Appropriately selected patients can benefit from a laparoscopic or open median arcuate ligament release. Institutional series have reported the outcomes of open and laparoscopic techniques but there are no nationwide analysis comparing both techniques and overall trends in treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2010 to 2020. Celiac artery compression syndrome cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and categorized as open or laparoscopic. Trends in the use of each technique and 30-day complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 578 open cases (76%) and 185 laparoscopic cases (24%) were identified. There was an increase adoption of the laparoscopic approach, with 22% of the cases employing this technique at the end of the study period, compared to 7% at the beginning of the study period. The open group had a higher prevalence of hypertension (26% vs 18%, p = 0.04) and bleeding disorders (5% vs 2%, p 0.03). Laparoscopic approach had a shorter length of stay (2.3 days vs 5.2 days, p < 0.0001), lower major complication rates (0.5% vs 4.0%, p = 0.02) and lower reoperation rates (0% vs 2.6%, p = 0.03). Overall mortality was 0.1%. CONCLUSION: Overall numbers of surgical intervention for treatment of median arcuate ligament increased during this timeframe, as well as increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach. It appears to be an overall safe procedure, offering lower rates of complications and shorter length of stay.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio , Humanos , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/cirugía , Ligamentos/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction is typically managed nonoperatively; however, refractory small bowel obstructions or closed loop obstructions necessitate operative intervention. Traditionally, laparotomy has long been the standard operative intervention for lysis of adhesions of small bowel obstructions. But as surgeons become more comfortable with minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopy has become a widely accepted intervention for small bowel obstructions. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy to open surgery in the operative management of small bowel obstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of operative small bowel obstruction cases at a single academic medical center from June 2016 to December 2019. Data were obtained from billing data and electronic medical record for patients with primary diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Postoperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and open intervention groups were compared. The primary outcome was time to return of bowel function. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, VTE, and reoperation rate. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of a total of 279 patients with 170 (61%) and 109 (39%) patients in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Patients undergoing laparoscopic intervention had overall shorter median return of bowel function (4 vs 6 days, p = 0.001) and median length of stay (8 vs 13 days, p = 0.001). When stratifying for bowel resection, patients in the laparoscopic group had shorter return of bowel function (5.5 vs 7 days, p = 0.06) and shorter overall length of stay (10 vs 16 days, p < 0.002). Patients in the laparoscopic group who did not undergo bowel resection had an overall shorter median return of bowel function (3 vs 5 days, p < 0.0009) and length of stay (7 vs 10 days, p < 0.006). When comparing surgeons who performed greater than 40% cases laparoscopically to those with fewer than 40%, there was no difference in patient characteristics. There was no significant difference in return of bowel function, length of stay, post-operative mortality, or re-admission laparoscopic preferred or open preferred surgeons. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intervention for the operative management of small bowel obstruction may provide superior clinical outcomes, shorter return of bowel function and length of stay compared to open operation, but patient selection for laparoscopic intervention is based on surgeon preference rather than patient characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Indications for revision in the SG-SADI cohort included weight recurrence (50.8%), inadequate weight loss (41.0%), other (3.0%), GERD (2.7%), and persistent comorbidities (2.5%). SG-SADI had longer operative times (156.7 vs 142.1 min, p < 0.001) and was not associated with a higher rate of serious complications (5.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.508) compared to p-SADI-S. p-SADI-S was associated with a higher rate of pneumonia (1.2 vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), and SG-SADI was not correlated with higher rates of reoperation (3.0 vs 3.2%, p = 0.861), readmission (5.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.948) and death (0.0 vs 0.2%, p = 0.437). On multivariable analysis, SG-SADI was not independently predictive of serious complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.52, p = 0.514) when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and operative time. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Gastrectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Viral transmission to healthcare providers during surgical procedures was a major concern at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The presence of the severe acute respiratory disease syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, in the abdominal cavity as well as in other abdominal tissues which surgeons are exposed has been investigated in several studies. The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze if the virus can be identify in the abdominal cavity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify relevant studies regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal tissues or fluids. Number of patients included as well as patient's characteristics, type of procedures, samples and number of positive samples were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were included (18 case series and 18 case reports). There were 357 samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2, obtained from 295 individuals. A total of 21 samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (5.9%). Positive samples were more frequently encountered in patients with severe COVID-19 (37.5% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001). No health-care provider related infections were reported. CONCLUSION: Although a rare occurrence, SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the abdominal tissues and fluids. It seems that the presence of the virus in the abdominal tissues or fluids is more likely in patients with severe disease. Protective measures should be employed in the operating room to protect the staff when operating patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , HecesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has had a profound impact on our healthcare system. Surgery in particular faced significant challenges related to allocation of resources and equitable patient selection, resulting in a delay in non-emergent procedures. We sought to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient outcomes after thyroidectomy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database that included all thyroidectomies from 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome evaluated was surgical outcomes during 2020, the first year of the pandemic, compared to years preceding the pandemic. Factors associated with adverse postoperative outcomes during the study period were included in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The volume of thyroidectomy procedures in 2020 decreased 16.4% when compared to the preceding years. During 2020, there was a significant increase in mortality (0.14% vs. 0.07%, p = 0.03), unplanned intubation (0.45% vs. 0.27%, p < 0.01) and cardiac arrest (0.11% vs. 0.03%, p < 0.01), while other complications remained stable. Undergoing surgery in 2020 remained as a risk factor for mortality in a multivariate analysis (OR 2.4 95% CI 1.3-4.4). CONCLUSION: The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on outcomes after thyroidectomy resulting in increased mortality. As the world recovers, there will likely be an increase number of patients seeking care who were unable to obtain it during the pandemic. Close attention should be placed on the outcomes which were altered during the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tiroidectomía , Humanos , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While many cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are mild, patients with underlying medical conditions such as hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), older age, and morbid obesity are at higher risk of hospitalization and death. These conditions are characteristic of patients eligible for bariatric surgery, many of whom underwent weight loss procedures in the months prior to cessation of elective surgery in March 2020. The effects of the virus on these high-risk patients who had increased healthcare exposure in the early days of the pandemic are currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience of patients who underwent bariatric surgery during the early evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including patients from a single center who underwent bariatric surgery from January 1st, 2020 to March 18th, 2020. A database was created to analyze patients' demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes. All patients were contacted and a telephone survey was completed to inquire about COVID-19 exposure, symptoms, and testing 30 days before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients underwent bariatric surgery during the study period. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was the most common procedure (71.6%). One hundred seventy-eight patients (93.7%) completed the telephone survey. Postoperatively, 19 patients (10.7%) reported COVID-19 compatible symptoms, and six patients (3.4%) went on to test positive for COVID-19. There were no COVID-19-related hospital admissions or mortalities in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese patients are at high risk of severe disease secondary to COVID-19, and those undergoing bariatric surgery during the evolution of the pandemic reported symptoms at a rate of 10.7% 30 days after the surgery. While none of these patients suffered severe COVID-19 disease, the temporal relationship of their symptomatology and increased exposure to the healthcare system as a result of their surgery suggest an increased risk of disease with elective surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , COVID-19 , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Anciano , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pandemias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy (HIDA) aids the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (AC) but has limitations. We sought to design a model based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) to predict HIDA results. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent a HIDA scan during the evaluation of AC was performed. Using logistic regression techniques incorporating the TG18 criterion and additional readily available patient characteristics, a prediction model was created to identify patients likely to test negative for acute cholecystitis by HIDA scan. RESULTS: In 235 patients with suspected AC, a HIDA scan was performed. Variables associated with positive HIDA results were male gender (RR 2.0 (CI 1.33-2.99), age (OR 1.02 (CI 1.01-1.04), right upper quadrant tenderness (RR 1.7 (CI 1.1-2.8)), clinical Murphy's sign (RR 2.2 (CI 1.5-3.4)), ultrasound findings suggestive of AC by any of its components (RR 3.2 (CI 1.6-6.5)), gallbladder wall thickening (RR 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.1)), and gallbladder distention (RR 1.9 (CI 1.3-2.9)). These variables allowed for creation of a model to predict HIDA results. The model predicted HIDA results in 36.9% of patients with an area under the curve of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of TG18, HIDA is probably over utilized. We developed an accurate, simple model based on TG18 that identifies a group of patients for whom a HIDA scan is unnecessary to establish the diagnosis of AC.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Cintigrafía , Estudios Retrospectivos , TokioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are variable. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) uses preoperative variables to calculate a score that identifies those patients that are more likely to have resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy. We aim to determine the efficacy of adrenalectomy and whether the ARS accurately predicts clinical success in a Black and Hispanic population. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PA from 2004 to 2018 at two academic centers treating primarily Hispanic and Black patients. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome consensus criterion. Retrospectively, the accuracy of ARS was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-three Hispanic and 10 Black patients underwent adrenalectomy for PA. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had complete clinical success. Variables associated with complete clinical success in the univariate analysis were female gender (p = 0.026), younger age (p = 0.001), lower preoperative aldosterone (p = 0.035), lower preoperative systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications (p = 0.007) and a higher ARS (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications was independently associated with complete clinical success (p = 0.026). The AUC of the ARS was 0.746. CONCLUSION: The rate of clinical success from adrenalectomy is good for Hispanic and Black patients with PA. Our analysis shows that the ARS is an accurate test of clinical success in Hispanic and Black patients. The ARS may be utilized preoperatively to frame expectations after adrenalectomy in these populations.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma Corticosuprarrenal , Hiperaldosteronismo , Hipertensión , Adrenalectomía , Adenoma Corticosuprarrenal/cirugía , Negro o Afroamericano , Aldosterona , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hiperaldosteronismo/cirugía , Hipertensión/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation has recently emerged as an alternative treatment for thyroid nodules. Most studies are centered on volume reduction, whereas a few have assessed symptom improvement mainly with nonstandardized metrics. As experience in the United States is growing, we aim to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in treating benign thyroid nodules using the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement for Parathyroid and Thyroid Disease. METHODS: This is a prospective study of a newly established radiofrequency ablation program at a single tertiary referral center in 2022. Patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation were evaluated using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement for Parathyroid and Thyroid Disease, a validated metric ranging from 0 to 100 at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. In addition, a thyroid ultrasound was done at those intervals to assess size and volume reduction. Procedure complications were evaluated as well. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation during the study period for a total of 32 nodules treated; 84% were female with a mean age of 51 years. The baseline mean nodule volume and largest dimension were 13 ± 11 mL and 3.4 ± 1 cm, respectively. A significant change in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement for Parathyroid and Thyroid Disease compressive score was seen at 3 months (38.9 ± 26.4 to 21.0 ± 21.4; P = .004) and 6 months (32.7 ± 19.9 to 17.5 ± 21.0; P = .02) but not at 2 weeks (41.0 ± 22.7 to 36.1 ± 21.9; P = .28). Significant volume and size reductions were seen at all 3-time points. Two complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Our initial results of the thyroid radiofrequency ablation program find that it effectively alleviates symptoms by reducing nodule size in patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Nódulo Tiroideo , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Tiroideo/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems are transitioning to value-based payment models based on analysis of quality over cost. To gain an understanding of the relationship between surgeon volume and health care costs, we compared the direct costs of thyroidectomy performed by dedicated high-volume endocrine surgeons and low-volume surgeons within a large health care system. METHODS: We evaluated all thyroid surgeries performed within a single billing year at a single health care system. We defined high-volume surgeons as those who treated >50 thyroid cases yearly and compared them to low-volume surgeons. To account for multicomponent procedures, we added the relative value units for the components of the cases. Then, we divided them into low-relative value units, intermediate-relative value units, and high-relative value units groups. We analyzed categorical and continuous variables using the χ2 analysis and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 674 thyroidectomy procedures performed by 27 surgeons, of whom 6 high-volume surgeons performed 79% of cases. Relative value unit distribution differed between the groups, with high-volume surgeons performing more intermediate-relative value unit (58% vs 34.7%, P < .01) and high-relative value unit (24.6% vs 20.6%, P < .01) cases, whereas low-volume surgeons performed more low-relative value unit cases (45% vs 17%, P < .01). Overall, high-volume surgeons incurred a 26% reduction in total costs (P < .01) and a 33% reduction in discretionary expenses (P < .01) across all relative value unit groups. CONCLUSION: High-volume endocrine surgeons perform thyroid procedures at a lower cost than their low-volume counterparts, a difference that is magnified when stratified by relative value unit groups.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Glándula Tiroides , Humanos , Glándula Tiroides/cirugía , Tiroidectomía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Hospitales de Alto VolumenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is considered less invasive compared with lateral transperitoneal counterpart. There is controversy in the literature about how the two approaches compare regarding perioperative outcomes. Moreover, no studies have compared both approaches while incorporating the use of a robotic platform. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a 1:1 matched propensity analysis. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy were matched 1:1 to patients who underwent robotic lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy between 2008 and 2022 at a single center. Matching factors included diagnosis, tumor size, Gerota's fascia-to-skin distance, and perinephric fat thickness. Perioperative outcomes were compared between groups using the χ2 analysis and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. RESULTS: A total of 511 robotic adrenalectomies were performed during the study period, of which 77 patients in each group were matched. There was no difference between posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy groups, respectively, in terms of operative time (134 vs 128 min, P = .64), conversion to open (0% vs 0%, P = .99), pain level on a postoperative day 1 (visual analog scale 5 vs 6, P = .14), morphine milligram equivalents used (18 vs 20 morphine milligram equivalents /day, P = .72), length of stay (1 vs 1 day, P = .48), and 90-day complications (2.6% vs 3.9%, P = .65). Estimated blood loss for posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was statistically lower (5 vs 10 mL, P = .001) but not considered to be clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Perioperative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy, including those related to recovery, were similar to those of posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy when matched for tumor and patient anthropometric parameters.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Adrenalectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/patología , Derivados de la Morfina , Laparoscopía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We investigated if anatomic patterns of abnormal parathyroid glands have ch anged for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) as atypical biochemical presentation (normohormonal and normocalcemic) has increased. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with pHPT who underwent routine bilateral neck exploration. RESULTS: 2762 patients were included. The "late" cohort (2014-2020) exhibited lower preoperative calcium (10.8 vs 11.1 âmg/dL; P â= â0.001) and PTH levels (101 vs. 146 âpg/mL; P â= â0.001) compared to the "early" cohort (2000-2006). Patients with atypical biochemical profiles increased from 25.5% to 31.3% (P â< â0.001). The prevalence of single adenoma (SA) decreased (66.1% vs 58.9%, P â= â0.02) while the proportion of double adenoma (DA) increased (17.3% vs. 22.6%, P â< â0.01). Upper parathyroid adenoma(s) remained the most common finding for SA and DA in both time points. CONCLUSIONS: Despite changes in patient characteristics, single upper adenoma and bilateral double upper adenomas remain the most common findings for patients with pHPT.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/sangre , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/cirugía , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/patología , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/complicaciones , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenoma/sangre , Adenoma/patología , Adenoma/cirugía , Adenoma/complicaciones , Adenoma/epidemiología , Anciano , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Calcio/sangre , Paratiroidectomía , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL. METHODS: Patients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data were available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 versus 49.8 yr, P < .001), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (45.5 versus 41.8 kg/m2, P < .001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 versus 13.6%, P < .001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 versus 123.2 min, P = .5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (LOS) (1.6 RYGB versus 1.6 LL d, P = .6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 versus .5%, P = .03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL versus 5.0% RYGB, P = 1.0) and mortality (.2 LL versus .1% RYGB, P = .5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Humanos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) with pouch migration after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an uncommon complication, with limited extant evidence for the utility of surgical repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presentation and resolution of symptoms in patients with HH repair after previous RYGB. SETTING: Multicenter University Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from 2010 to 2022. Patients with prior RYGB who were undergoing subsequent isolated HH repair were included. Patients undergoing incidental HH repair during concomitant revisional bariatric surgery were excluded. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). RESULTS: Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The time from RYGB to HH repair was 59 months (39-88). Body mass index at HH repair was 31 kg/m2 (27-39). The most common presenting symptoms of hernia were dysphagia (52%), gastric reflux (39%), and abdominal pain (36%). All HH repairs were completed with a minimally invasive approach (98% laparoscopic, 2% robotic). Nonabsorbable suture was used in 98% of patients, with bioabsorbable mesh in 30%. At a median 28-day (12-117) follow-up, 70% of patients reported full symptom resolution and 23% partial resolution. At follow-up, 2 patients had radiologic HH recurrence, with 1 requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of isolated HH repair for symptomatic pouch migration after previous RYGB. Common presenting symptoms are dysphagia and reflux, and surgical repair yields a high rate of symptom resolution in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the durability of this intervention.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Hernia Hiatal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/etiología , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Data reported on comparing primary and revisional procedures in the elderly is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between primary and revisional bariatric surgery in a cohort of older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients ≥ 60 years old were divided into two cohorts, primary surgery cohort (PSC) and revisional surgery cohort (RSC). Baseline and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (34 PSC and 24 RSC) in the study. Forty-two (25 PSC and 17 RSC) 72.4% were female. The mean age was 64 (± 3.3 years) in the PSC and 65 (± 4.2 years) in the RSC, the median initial BMI was 46.7 and 47.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.848), respectively. The mean hospital stay was (3 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.022) days. Readmissions occurred in (1 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p = 0.158) patients within 30 days of discharge. Postoperative major complications included (1 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.0278) patients. Reoperations were reported in (0 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p < 0.034) patients. Patients who underwent surgery for weight management, the initial mean BMI was (46.7 PSC vs. 47.4 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.848). At 12-months post-procedure, the mean BMI was (34.3 PSC vs. 37.7 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.372) and (23.7 PSC vs. 19.1 RSC, p = 0.231) %TBWL. The mean overall follow-up was (12.4 PSC vs. 27.5 RSC, p < 0.004) months, and one unrelated death (cancer) was reported in the RSC. CONCLUSION: PSC and RSC are effective in the elderly, however postoperative complications occurred more often in the RSC group.