A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene-drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug-gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug-gene interaction in the study group versus the control group were compared, and only if the difference was statistically significant was an analysis done that included all of the patients in the study. Outcomes were compared between the study and control groups, both for patients with an actionable drug-gene interaction test result (ie, a result for which the DPWG recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) and for all patients who received at least one dose of index drug. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03093818 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between March 7, 2017, and June 30, 2020, 41 696 patients were assessed for eligibility and 6944 (51·4 % female, 48·6% male; 97·7% self-reported European, Mediterranean, or Middle Eastern ethnicity) were enrolled and assigned to receive genotype-guided drug treatment (n=3342) or standard care (n=3602). 99 patients (52 [1·6%] of the study group and 47 [1·3%] of the control group) withdrew consent after group assignment. 652 participants (367 [11·0%] in the study group and 285 [7·9%] in the control group) were lost to follow-up. In patients with an actionable test result for the index drug (n=1558), a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction occurred in 152 (21·0%) of 725 patients in the study group and 231 (27·7%) of 833 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·91]; p=0·0075), whereas for all patients, the incidence was 628 (21·5%) of 2923 patients in the study group and 934 (28·6%) of 3270 patients in the control group (OR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·79]; p <0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Genotype-guided treatment using a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions and was feasible across diverse European health-care system organisations and settings. Large-scale implementation could help to make drug therapy increasingly safe. FUNDING: European Union Horizon 2020.

Combined effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes on escitalopram serum concentration and its metabolic ratio in a European patient population.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and metabolism of escitalopram in patients stratified by CYP2C19 genotype in a large real-world population. METHODS: Patients were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring service if they had measured serum concentration of escitalopram and the metabolite, N-desmethyl escitalopram, and performed CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotyping. Patients were divided into 16 combined genotype-predicted phenotype subgroups (poor [PM], intermediate [IM], normal [NM] and ultrarapid metabolizers [UM]) of CYP2C19/CYP2D6. The concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (metabolic ratio) of escitalopram were compared across subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with CYP2D6 NMs as the reference group. RESULTS: A total of 5067 patients were included in the study. A stepwise increase in escitalopram CD ratio by decreasing CYP2D6 activity was observed in all CYP2C19 subgroups, except for in CYP2C19 UMs. The percentage differences in escitalopram CD ratio between CYP2D6 PMs and NMs were 24% in CYP2C19 NMs (P < .001), 28% in CYP2C19 IMs (P < .001) and 31% in CYP2C19 PMs (P = .04). As for the CD ratio, CYP2D6 genotype effect on metabolic ratio increased stepwise by decreasing CYP2C19 metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: CYP2D6 genotype is of significant importance for the individual variation in escitalopram pharmacokinetics. The most relevant increase in escitalopram concentration is seen in individuals with decreased and/or absent CYP2C19 activity. By combining CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes, the optimal dose for patients may be predicted with greater precision than for CYP2C19 genotype alone.

Identification and comparison of sex-specific serious adverse drug reactions in spontaneous reports and systematically collected reports (ADRED).

AIMS: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are known to show sex-specific differences in occurrence and phenotype. The aim of this study was to analyse sex-specific differences in ADR-drug combinations that required hospitalization based on two different datasets. METHODS: We performed a complementary analysis of (i) spontaneously reported (n = 12 564, female = 51.7%) and (ii) systematically collected ADR reports from a prospective multicentre observational study (ADRED, n = 2355, female = 48.2%) from Germany in the ADR database EudraVigilance (EV). Both datasets were analysed separately concerning the suspected drugs, ADRs and ADR-drug combinations more frequently reported for females or males by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals. ADR-drug combinations more frequently reported for either females or males in EV reports were related to prescription data. Finally, the results from both datasets were discussed with regard to their (dis-)concordance. RESULTS: In both datasets, some antineoplastic agents and nervous system drugs were found to be reported more often for females than males (RORs ranging from 1.5 [1.1-2.1] for quetiapine in spontaneous reports to 41.3 [13.1-130.0] for trastuzumab in spontaneous reports). ADRs of the respiratory system, and haemorrhages were described predominantly for males in both datasets. In spontaneous reports the ADR-drug combination self-injurious behaviour-quetiapine was more often reported for females without and with consideration of drug prescriptions (ROR: 3.8 [1.3-11.0]). Quetiapine and psychiatric disorders (superordinate level) was exclusively reported for females in ADRED reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our results can contribute to raise awareness and further knowledge regarding sex-specific ADRs. The findings require further in-depth investigation.

The gradient model of brain organization in decisions involving "empathy for pain".

Influential models of cortical organization propose a close relationship between heteromodal association areas and highly connected hubs in the default mode network. The "gradient model" of cortical organization proposes a close relationship between these areas and highly connected hubs in the default mode network, a set of cortical areas deactivated by demanding tasks. Here, we used a decision-making task and representational similarity analysis with classic "empathy for pain" stimuli to probe the relationship between high-level representations of imminent pain in others and these areas. High-level representations were colocalized with task deactivations or the transitions from activations to deactivations. These loci belonged to 2 groups: those that loaded on the high end of the principal cortical gradient and were associated by meta-analytic decoding with the default mode network, and those that appeared to accompany functional repurposing of somatosensory cortex in the presence of visual stimuli. These findings suggest that task deactivations may set out cortical areas that host high-level representations. We anticipate that an increased understanding of the cortical correlates of high-level representations may improve neurobiological models of social interactions and psychopathology.

Catch Me if You Can: the Crosstalk of Zika Virus and the Restriction Factor Tetherin.

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a flavivirus that is mainly transmitted by Aedes mosquitos and normally causes mild symptoms. During the outbreak in the Americas in 2015, it was associated with more severe implications, like microcephaly in newborns and the Guillain-Barré syndrome. The lack of specific vaccines and cures strengthens the need for a deeper understanding of the virus life cycle and virus-host interactions. The restriction factor tetherin (THN) is an interferon-inducible cellular protein with broad antiviral properties. It is known to inhibit the release of various enveloped viruses by tethering them to each other and the cell membrane, thereby preventing their further spread. On the other hand, different viruses have developed various escape strategies against THN. Analysis of the cross-talk between ZIKV and THN revealed that, despite a strong induction of THN mRNA expression in ZIKV-infected cells, this is not reflected by an elevated protein level of THN. Contrariwise, the THN protein level is decreased due to a reduced half-life. The increased degradation of THN in ZIKV infected cells involves the endo-lysosomal system but does not depend on the early steps of autophagy. Enrichment of THN by depletion of the ESCRT-0 protein HRS diminishes ZIKV release and spread, which points out the capacity of THN to restrict ZIKV and explains the enhanced THN degradation in infected cells as an effective viral escape strategy. IMPORTANCE Although tetherin expression is strongly induced by ZIKV infection there is a reduction in the amount of tetherin protein. This is due to enhanced lysosomal degradation. However, if the tetherin level is rescued then the release of ZIKV is impaired. This shows that tetherin is a restriction factor for ZIKV, and the induction of an efficient degradation represents a viral escape strategy. To our knowledge, this is the first study that describes and characterizes tetherin as a restriction factor for the ZIKV life cycle.

Association of Systemic Medication Use with Glaucoma and Intraocular Pressure: The European Eye Epidemiology Consortium.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of commonly used systemic medications with glaucoma and intraocular pressure (IOP) in the European population. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 11 population-based cohort studies of the European Eye Epidemiology Consortium. PARTICIPANTS: The glaucoma analyses included 143 240 participants and the IOP analyses included 47 177 participants. METHODS: We examined associations of 4 categories of systemic medications-antihypertensive medications (ß-blockers, diuretics, calcium channel blockers [CCBs], α-agonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers), lipid-lowering medications, antidepressants, and antidiabetic medications-with glaucoma prevalence and IOP. Glaucoma ascertainment and IOP measurement method were according to individual study protocols. Results of multivariable regression analyses of each study were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. Associations with antidiabetic medications were examined in participants with diabetes only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glaucoma prevalence and IOP. RESULTS: In the meta-analyses of our maximally adjusted multivariable models, use of CCBs was associated with a higher prevalence of glaucoma (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.39). This association was stronger for monotherapy of CCBs with direct cardiac effects (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.12). No other antihypertensive medications, lipid-lowering medications, antidepressants, or antidiabetic medications were associated with glaucoma. Use of systemic ß-blockers was associated with a lower IOP (ß coefficient, -0.33 mmHg; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.08 mmHg). Monotherapy of both selective systemic ß-blockers (ß coefficient, -0.45 mmHg; 95% CI -0.74 to -0.16 mmHg) and nonselective systemic ß-blockers (ß coefficient, -0.54 mmHg; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.15 mmHg) was associated with lower IOP. A suggestive association was found between use of high-ceiling diuretics and lower IOP (ß coefficient, -0.30 mmHg; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.14 mmHg) but not when used as monotherapy. No other antihypertensive medications, lipid-lowering medications, antidepressants, or antidiabetic medications were associated with IOP. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a potentially harmful association between use of CCBs and glaucoma prevalence. Additionally, we observed and quantified the association of lower IOP with systemic ß-blocker use. Both findings potentially are important, given that patients with glaucoma frequently use systemic antihypertensive medications. Determining causality of the CCB association should be a research priority. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Inhalation therapies in COPD - adverse drug reactions impact on emergency department presentations.

PURPOSE: Inhaled drugs have been cornerstones in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for decades and show a high prescription volume. Due to the local application, drug safety issues of these therapies are often underestimated by professionals and patients. Data about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by inhaled therapy in patients with COPD and polypharmacy are rare. We aimed to analyze the use and relevance of inhaled therapies in those patients in relation to ADR complaints, which were severe enough to warrant presentation to the emergency department. METHODS: Emergency department cases due to suspected ADRs of the ADRED database (n = 2939, "Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments"; DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979, registration date 01/11/2017) were analyzed for inhaled drugs in patients with COPD. ADRs in cases with overdosed inhaled drugs were compared to non-overdosed cases. ADRs, potentially caused by inhaled drugs, were evaluated, clustered into complexes, and assessed for association with inhaled drug classes. RESULTS: Of the 269 included COPD cases, 67% (n = 180) received inhaled therapy. In 16% (n = 28), these therapies were overdosed. Overdosed cases presented the complexes of malaise and local symptoms more frequently. Related to the use of inhaled anticholinergics, local (dysphagia-like) and related to inhaled beta-2 agonists, local (dysphagia-like) and sympathomimetic-like ADRs presented more frequently. CONCLUSION: Overdosed inhaled therapies in patients with COPD lead to relevant ADRs and impact on emergency room presentations. These are rarely associated to inhaled therapy by healthcare professionals or patients. Due to the high volume of inhaled drug prescriptions, pharmacovigilance and patient education should be more focused in patients with COPD. German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979.

Use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications associated with falls leading to emergency department visits: results from the ADRED study.

PURPOSE: Drug intake might be a modifiable factor for the individual fall-risk of older adults, and anticholinergic properties of drugs need to be considered. This study is aimed at analyzing the association of older adults' individual anticholinergic load with particular focus on use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications with falls in multi-medicated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of the prospective, observational, multi-center study on adverse drug reactions leading to emergency departments (ADRED study) between 2015 and 2018 in Germany were analyzed comparing the exposure of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications on the chance to present with a fall with patients without exposure. Logistic regression analysis was used adjusting for pre-existing conditions, drug exposure, and the individual anticholinergic burden by drug use. To this end, a combination of seven expert-based anticholinergic rating scales was used. RESULTS: The anticholinergic burden was higher in patients with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (median 2 [1; 3]) compared to not taking drugs of interest. Presenting with a fall was associated with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (odds ratio (OR) 2.34 [95% confidence interval 1.14-4.82]). The use of fall-risk increasing drugs was likewise associated (OR 2.30 [1.32-4.00]). The anticholinergic burden itself seemed not to be associated with falls (OR 1.01 [0.90-1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Although falls occur multifactorial in older adults and confounding by indication cannot be ruled out, the indication for a drug treatment should be decided with caution when other, non-pharmacological treatment options have been tried. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979, registration date 01/11/2017.

Population genetic polymorphisms of pharmacogenes in Zimbabwe, a potential guide for the safe and efficacious use of medicines in people of African ancestry.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a clinically significant factor in the safe and efficacious use of medicines. While PGx knowledge is abundant for other populations, there are scarce PGx data on African populations and is little knowledge on drug-gene interactions for medicines used to treat diseases common in Africa. The aim of this study was to use a custom-designed open array to genotype clinically actionable variants in a Zimbabwean population. This study also identified some of the commonly used drugs in Zimbabwe and the associated genes involved in their metabolism. METHODS: A custom-designed open array that covers 120 genetic variants was used to genotype 522 black Zimbabwean healthy volunteers using TaqMan-based single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping. Data were also accessed from Essential Drugs' List in Zimbabwe (EDLIZ), and the medicines were grouped into the associated biomarker groups based on their metabolism. We also estimated the national drug procurement levels for medicines that could benefit from PGx-guided use based on the data obtained from the national authorities in Zimbabwe. RESULTS: The results demonstrate the applicability of an open-array chip in simultaneously determining multiple genetic variants in an individual, thus significantly reducing cost and time to generate PGx data. There were significantly high frequencies of African-specific variants, such as the CYP2D6*17 and *29 variants and the CYP2B6*18 variant. The data obtained showed that the Zimbabwean population exhibits PGx variations in genes important for the safe and efficacious use of drugs approved by the EDLIZ and are procured at significantly large amounts annually. The study has established a cohort of genotyped healthy volunteers that can be accessed and used in the conduct of clinical pharmacogenetic studies for drugs entering a market of people of predominantly African ancestry. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated the potential benefit of integrating PGx in Zimbabwe for the safe and efficacious use of drugs that are commonly used.

Green Tea Extract to Prevent Colorectal Adenomas, Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical, epidemiological, and small clinical studies suggest that green tea extract (GTE) and its major active component epigallocatechingallate (EGCG) exhibit antineoplastic effects in the colorectum. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial of GTE standardized to 150 mg of EGCG b.i.d. vs placebo over 3 years was conducted to prevent colorectal adenomas (n = 1,001 with colon adenomas enrolled, 40 German centers). Randomization (1:1, n = 879) was performed after a 4-week run-in with GTE for safety assessment. The primary end point was the presence of adenoma/colorectal cancer at the follow-up colonoscopy 3 years after randomization. RESULTS: The safety profile of GTE was favorable with no major differences in adverse events between the 2 well-balanced groups. Adenoma rate in the modified intention-to-treat set (all randomized participants [intention-to-treat population] and a follow-up colonoscopy 26-44 months after randomization; n = 632) was 55.7% in the placebo and 51.1% in the GTE groups. This 4.6% difference was not statistically significant (adjusted relative risk 0.905; P = 0.1613). The respective figures for the per-protocol population were 54.3% (151/278) in the placebo group and 48.3% (129/267) in the GTE group, indicating a slightly lower adenoma rate in the GTE group, which was not significant (adjusted relative risk 0.883; P = 0.1169). DISCUSSION: GTE was well tolerated, but there was no statistically significant difference in the adenoma rate between the GTE and the placebo groups in the whole study population.

Evaluation of the EMPAR study population on the basis of metabolic phenotypes of selected pharmacogenes.

The impact of genetic variability of pharmacogenes as a possible risk factor for adverse drug reactions is elucidated in the EMPAR (Einfluss metabolischer Profile auf die Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit in der Routineversorgung/English: influence of metabolic profiles on the safety of drug therapy in routine care) study. EMPAR evaluates possible associations of pharmacogenetically predicted metabolic profiles relevant for the metabolism of frequently prescribed cardiovascular drugs. Based on a German study population of 10,748 participants providing access to healthcare claims data and DNA samples for pharmacogenetic assessment, first analyses were performed and evaluated. The aim of this first evaluation was the characterization of the study population with regard to general parameters such as age, gender, comorbidity, and polypharmacy at baseline (baseline year) as well as important combinations of cardiovascular drugs with relevant genetic variants and predicted metabolic phenotypes. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on July 6, 2018 (DRKS00013909).

Analysis of BNT162b2- and CVnCoV-elicited sera and of convalescent sera toward SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

BACKGROUND: The mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BioNTech/Pfizer) and the vaccine candidate CVnCoV (Curevac) each encode a stabilized spike protein of SARS-CoV2 as antigen but differ with respect to the nature of the mRNA (modified versus unmodified nucleotides) and the mRNA amount (30 µg versus 12 µg RNA). This study characterizes antisera elicited by these two vaccines in comparison to convalescent sera. METHODS: Sera from BNT162b2 vaccinated healthcare workers, and sera from participants of a phase I trial vaccinated with 2, 4, 6, 8, or 12 µg CVnCoV and convalescent sera from hospitalized patients were analyzed by ELISA, neutralization tests, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and peptide arrays. RESULTS: BNT162b2-elicited sera and convalescent sera have a higher titer of spike-RBD-specific antibodies and neutralizing antibodies as compared to the CVnCoV-elicited sera. For all analyzed sera a reduction in binding and neutralizing antibodies was found for the lineage B.1.351 variant of concern. SPR analyses revealed that the CVnCoV-elicited sera have a lower fraction of slow-dissociating antibodies. Accordingly, the CVnCoV sera almost fail to compete with the spike-ACE2 interaction. The significance of common VOC mutations K417N, E484K, or N501Y focused on linear epitopes was analyzed using a peptide array approach. The peptide arrays showed a strong difference between convalescent sera and vaccine-elicited sera. Specifically, the linear epitope at position N501 was affected by the mutation and elucidates the escape of viral variants to antibodies against this linear epitope. CONCLUSION: These data reveal differences in titer, neutralizing capacity, and affinity of the antibodies between BNT162b2- and CVnCoV-elicited sera, which could contribute to the apparent differences in vaccine efficacy.

Validation of self-reported medication use applying untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics techniques in the Rhineland study.

AIMS: To assess the validity of self-reported continuous medication use with drug metabolites measured in plasma by using untargeted mass spectrometric techniques. METHODS: In a population-based cohort in Bonn, Germany, we compared interview-based, self-reported medication intake with drug-specific metabolites measured in plasma (based on participants who completed their study visits between March 2016 and February 2020). Analyses were done stratified by sex and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years). Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 13 drugs used to treat hypertension, gout, diabetes, epilepsy and depression were analysed in a sample of 4386 individuals (mean age 55 years, 56.1% women). Eleven drugs showed almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.8), whereas sitagliptin and hydrochlorothiazide showed substantial (κ = 0.8, 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and moderate agreement (κ = 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.66), respectively. Frequency of use allowed sex- and age-stratified analyses for eight and nine drugs, respectively. For five drugs, concordance tended to be higher for women than for men. For most drugs, concordance was higher among individuals aged ≥65 years than among individuals aged <65 years, but these age-related differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: High concordance rates between self-reported drug use and metabolites measured in plasma suggest that self-reported drug use is reliable and accurate for assessing drug use.

Pharmacogenetic and drug interaction aspects on ketamine safety in its use as antidepressant - implications for precision dosing in a global perspective.

Ketamine and its enantiomer S-ketamine (esketamine) are known to produce rapid-onset antidepressant effects in major depression. Intranasal esketamine has recently come onto the market as an antidepressant. Besides experience from short-term use in anaesthesia and analgesia, the experience with ketamine as long-term medication is rather low. The use of ketamine and esketamine is limited due to potential neurotoxicity, psychotomimetic side effects, potential abuse and interindividual variability in treatment response including cessation of therapy. Therefore, taking a look at individual patient risks and potential underlying variability in pharmacokinetics may improve safety and dosing of these new antidepressant drugs in clinical practice. Differential drug metabolism due to polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and gene-drug interactions are known to influence the efficacy and safety of many drugs. Ketamine and esketamine are metabolized by polymorphic CYP enzymes including CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2A6. In antidepressant drug therapy, usually multiple drugs are administered which are substrates of CYP enzymes, increasing the risk for drug-drug interactions. We reviewed the potential impact of polymorphic CYP variants and common drug-drug interactions in antidepressant drug therapy affecting ketamine pharmacokinetics, and the role for dose optimization. The use of ketamine or intranasal esketamine as antidepressants demands a better understanding of the factors that may impact its metabolism and efficacy in long-term use. In addition to other clinical and environmental confounders, prior information on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic determinants of response variability to ketamine and esketamine may inform on dose optimization and identification of individuals at risk of adverse drug reactions.

[Childhood Glaucoma]. / Kindliche Glaukomerkrankungen.

Childhood glaucoma is a rare disease. Since a lacking therapy normally leads to blindness an immediate diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial. The heterogeneity of childhood glaucoma requires a comprehensive knowledge of possible underlying pathomechanisms of primary and secondary childhood glaucoma types. Several types of childhood glaucoma are accompanied with ocular or systemic syndromes and hereditary causes are frequent. Thus, an interdisciplinary team of ophthalmologists, orthoptists, pediatricians, human geneticists, and anesthesiologists is vital for a successful supply. Most cases rely on a dysgenesis of trabecular meshwork with impaired outflow. Thus, usually a surgical approach is indicated. To handle a surgery in a buphthalmic eye an experienced hand is required. Special attention should be paid on the correct prescription of topical antiglaucomatous therapy in children since they are more prone to develop side effects. This article aims to provide an overview about the different childhood glaucoma types and to point out the most important aspects of their individual treatment strategies.

Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication and pharmacogenomics drug exposure in the Rhineland Study.

AIM: High medication use may contribute to the efficiency of drug therapy in general, but it could also increase the burden of adverse drug reactions. We aimed to assess medication use and the prevalence of three risk factors for adverse drug reactions: the use of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly and pharmacogenomic polymorphisms affecting the metabolism of drugs. METHODS: Cross-sectional interview-based medication data (including over-the-counter drugs) was collected in a large population-based cohort (≥30 years of age) in Bonn, Germany. RESULTS: Analyses were based on the first 5000 participants of the Rhineland Study (mean age 55 years, 57% women). Of our participants, 66.0% reported the use of a drug regularly, which increased to 87.4% in participants aged ≥65 years (n = 1301). The rates of use of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication and pharmacogenomic drugs were 15.9%, 6.4% and 20.5%, respectively. In participants <65 years, 16.0% (95% CI 14.8, 17.3) had at least one risk factor. In participants aged ≥65 years, 54.1% (95% CI 51.4, 56.8) had at least one and 27.4% (95% CI 25.0, 29.9) had at least two risk factors. Extrapolating these numbers to the German population implies that around 9 million of the 17 million individuals aged 65 years or older are potentially at an elevated risk for adverse drug reactions, of which 4.6 million are at a potentially highly elevated risk for adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that drug use is common and the individual risk for an adverse drug reaction in our population is high. This suggests room for improvement in general medication use.

Generating evidence for precision medicine: considerations made by the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium when designing and operationalizing the PREPARE study.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacogenetic panel-based testing represents a new model for precision medicine. A sufficiently powered prospective study assessing the (cost-)effectiveness of a panel-based pharmacogenomics approach to guide pharmacotherapy is lacking. Therefore, the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium initiated the PREemptive Pharmacogenomic testing for prevention of Adverse drug Reactions (PREPARE) study. Here, we provide an overview of considerations made to mitigate multiple methodological challenges that emerged during the design. METHODS: An evaluation of considerations made when designing the PREPARE study across six domains: study aims and design, primary endpoint definition and collection of adverse drug events, inclusion and exclusion criteria, target population, pharmacogenomics intervention strategy, and statistical analyses. RESULTS: Challenges and respective solutions included: (1) defining and operationalizing a composite primary endpoint enabling measurement of the anticipated effect, by including only severe, causal, and drug genotype-associated adverse drug reactions; (2) avoiding overrepresentation of frequently prescribed drugs within the patient sample while maintaining external validity, by capping drugs of enrolment; (3) designing the pharmacogenomics intervention strategy to be applicable across ethnicities and healthcare settings; and (4) designing a statistical analysis plan to avoid dilution of effect by initially excluding patients without a gene-drug interaction in a gatekeeping analysis. CONCLUSION: Our design considerations will enable quantification of the collective clinical utility of a panel of pharmacogenomics-markers within one trial as a proof-of-concept for pharmacogenomics-guided pharmacotherapy across multiple actionable gene-drug interactions. These considerations may prove useful to other investigators aiming to generate evidence for precision medicine.

Subtherapeutic bupropion and hydroxybupropion serum concentrations in a patient with CYP2C19*1/*17 genotype suggesting a rapid metabolizer status.

Bupropion is hydroxylated to its primary active metabolite hydroxybupropion by cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2B6. In vitro data suggest the existence of alternative hydroxylation pathways mediated by the highly polymorphic enzyme CYP2C19. However, the impact of its genetic variants on bupropion metabolism in vivo is still under investigation. We report the case of a 28-year-old male Caucasian outpatient suffering from major depressive disorder who did not respond to a treatment with bupropion. Therapeutic drug monitoring revealed very low serum concentrations of both bupropion and hydroxybupropion. Genotyping identified a heterozygous status for the gain-of-function allele with the genotype CYP2C19*1/*17 predicting enhanced enzymatic activity. The present case shows a reduced bupropion efficacy, which may be explained by a reduced active moiety of bupropion and its active metabolite hydroxybupropion, due to alternative hydroxylation pathways mediated by CYP2C19 in an individual with CYP2C19 rapid metabolizer status. The case report thus illustrates the clinical relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with pharmacogenetics diagnostics for a personalized treatment approach.

The phenotype of adverse drug effects: Do emergency visits due to adverse drug reactions look different in older people? Results from the ADRED study.

AIMS: Older patients in particular suffer from adverse drug reactions (ADR) when presenting in the emergency department. We aimed to characterise the phenotype of those ADRs, to be able to recognise an ADR in older patients. METHODS: Cases of ADRs in emergency departments collected within the multicentre prospective observational study (ADRED) were analysed (n = 2215). We analysed ADR-associated diagnoses, symptoms and their risk profiles. We present frequencies and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for adults (18-64 years) compared to older adults (≥65 years; young-old 65-79, old-old ≥80 years) and regression coefficients (B) for each year of age. RESULTS: Most prominent differences were seen for drug-associated confusion, dehydration, and bradycardia (OR 6.70 [1.59-28.27], B .054; OR 6.02 [2.41-15.03], B .081, and 4.82 [2.21-10.54], B .040), more likely seen in older adults. Bleedings were reported in all age groups, but gastrointestinal bleedings occurred with more than doubled chance in older adults (OR 2.46 [1.77-3.41], B .030), likewise did other bleedings such as haemorrhage from respiratory passages (OR 2.89 [1.37-6.11], B.036). Falls were more likely in older adults (OR 2.84 [1.77-4.53], B .030), while dizziness was frequent in both age groups. CONCLUSION: Our data point to differences in symptoms of ADRs between adults and older individuals, with dangerous drug-associated phenomena in the older adult such as bleedings or falls. Physicians should consider drug-associated origins of symptoms in older adults with an increased risk for serious health problems.

Personalising drug safety-results from the multi-centre prospective observational study on Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments (ADRED).

PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) account for 5 to 7% of emergency department (ED) consultations. We aimed to assess medication risk profiles for ADRs leading to ED visits. METHODS: We analysed medication intake and patient demographics in a prospective multi-centre observational study collecting ADR cases in four large EDs in Germany. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to relate drug classes taken to those suspicious for an ADR after a causality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 2215 cases of ED visits due to ADRs were collected. The median age of the cohort was 73 years; in median, six co-morbidities and an intake of seven drugs were documented. Antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents had the highest OR for being suspected for an ADR (OR 20.45, 95% CI 14.54-28.77), followed by antithrombotics (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.49-3.47), antibiotics (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.78-3.95), systemic glucocorticoids (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54-3.82) and drugs affecting the central nervous system (CNS), such as antipsychotics (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.46-3.81), antidepressants (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.57-2.83), antiparkinsonian medication (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.15-3.84), opioids (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.54) and non-opioid analgesics (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing ADRs leading to ED visits are commonly old, multi-morbid and multi-medicated. CNS drugs may be more relevant than prior expected. With calculating ORs, we could replicate involvement of antineoplastic agents, antithrombotics, antibiotics, systemic glucocorticoids and non-opioid analgesics as frequently suspected for ADRs in EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979.