Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 29(8): 895-8, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24915844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Today, we do not have a universally accepted evidence on how to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) in international guidelines. METHODS: The present study is a review of the literature investigating current strategies to treat CRC PC. RESULTS: Despite the progresses of systemic chemotherapy, the presence of PC among patients with metastatic CRC reduces the overall survival to 30 %, and only 4 % of patients with PC from CRC treated are alive for 5 years. Many trials evaluate the combined treatment of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRC PC, suggesting a survival benefit in highly selected patients. Only one trial is randomized and presents some biases. The two main prognostic factors are Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC score). There is no universal agreement on how to approach the synchronous presence of PC and liver metastasis with a curative intent during the same procedure. A growing interest among the scientific community has arisen about systematic second-look surgery and HIPEC treatment in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Current evidences suggest that CRS and HIPEC might be beneficial in highly selected patients affected with PC from CRC. Anyway, today, there is a shortage of well-designed phase 3 trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Pronóstico
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 394(6): 1079-84, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18317795

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Survival rates of patients with stage IV melanoma are poor: Median survival is 7-8 months and 5-year survival rates about 5%. There is no agreement on the role of surgery at this stage. Most patients with metastatic melanoma are not able to undergo resection and usually are sent to systemic chemo- and immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients operated on for stage IV melanoma were evaluated. Of them, 61.9% were submitted to reiterative surgery with 168 operations and 182 surgical procedures overall. A total of 90.5% was submitted to adjuvant therapies according to aggressive and reiterated schedules: chemotherapy, immunotherapy, dendritic cells vaccine, infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, local therapies as electrochemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 56.7 months (1 year: 72.1%, 3 years: 46.5%, 5 years: 23.16%). The survival of reiterative surgery was significatively longer than single surgery (62.7 vs 42.4 months, median 50.9 vs 16.0), p = 0.03. Multivariated Cox analysis was performed for disease-free interval, repeated surgery, adjuvant therapies, and site of metastasis according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer: Reiterative surgery was shown as an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Metastatic resection associated with adjuvant therapy may improve overall survival and, in some instances, can provide long-term survival, whatever site and numbers of metastasis. In our series, reiterative surgery was more significatively efficient in improving survival than single-time surgery.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 391(2): 113-7, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16525854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sentinel node biopsy is currently used in surgery of malignant melanoma and breast cancer. The feasibility of sentinel node mapping in gastrointestinal cancers and its diagnostic sensitivity is unclear. It could be of particular value in the management of early gastric cancer in which radical D2 lymphadenectomy may be unnecessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to June 2005, ten patients with preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer and no nodal involvement (cT1N0) were submitted to sentinel node biopsy using the dual mapping procedure with endoscopic blue dye and 99mTc radio colloid injection. All the patients underwent standard radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. The resected nodes were evaluated by routine (hematoxylin-eosin) histopathological examination; the sentinel (blue or hot) nodes, in addition, were evaluated with immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin. RESULTS: The detection rate of this procedure was 100%. The preliminary results and perspectives for feasibility of sentinel node biopsy and its accuracy in predicting the nodal status in early gastric cancer are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colorantes , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiofármacos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA