Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
2.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(4): 483-489, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30346267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic antibody-mediated rejection is the main cause of late kidney graft loss. The presence of donor-specific antibodies in the serum is the main criterion for this diagnosis. Single antigen Luminex assays can identify donor-specific antibodies, and semiquantitative estimates of antibodies can be assessed using mean fluorescence intensity. Recent data have shown that patients whose donor-specific antibodies fix C3d have worse clinical outcomes, implying that C3d-specific Luminex assays may provide useful prognostic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared C3d donor-specific antibodies with standard immunoglobulin G donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensities in a cohort of patients with de novo class II donor-specific antibodies and analyzed subsequent graft survival. The included kidney graft recipients received transplants between 2005 and 2015 and had developed de novo class II donor-specific antibodies. Serum was tested using the standard single antigen Luminex technique and the C3d-fixing antibody-detection system (Immucor, Herentals, Belgium). RESULTS: In our patient cohort, 41/924 patients (4.4%) developed class II donor-specific antibodies, and 65 serum samples were analyzed (at baseline and follow-up). Among these samples, 43 (66%) were negative for C3d donor-specific antibodies. A mean fluorescence intensity threshold of 9000 in the single antigen Luminex assay discerned all negative (from positive) C3d donor-specific antibodies, even when all single-bead results were taken into account. Sixteen patients (39%) had poor outcomes (ie, either creatinine levels had doubled or they had lost their graft) over the median follow-up of 5 years. C3d results were significantly associated with graft survival (P = .04). We found a strong correlation between C3d-fixing antibody positivity and mean fluorescence intensity strength in the setting of de novo class II donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: These results further reinforce the paradigm that the higher the mean fluorescence intensity, the more complement activation occurs. Routine C3d testing is thus unnecessary in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Complemento C3d/inmunología , Pruebas de Fijación del Complemento , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Supervivencia de Injerto , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Mediciones Luminiscentes , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA