RESUMEN
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified numerous lung cancer risk-associated loci. However, decoding molecular mechanisms of these associations is challenging since most of these genetic variants are non-protein-coding with unknown function. Here, we implemented massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) to simultaneously measure the allelic transcriptional activity of risk-associated variants. We tested 2,245 variants at 42 loci from 3 recent GWASs in East Asian and European populations in the context of two major lung cancer histological types and exposure to benzo(a)pyrene. This MPRA approach identified one or more variants (median 11 variants) with significant effects on transcriptional activity at 88% of GWAS loci. Multimodal integration of lung-specific epigenomic data demonstrated that 63% of the loci harbored multiple potentially functional variants in linkage disequilibrium. While 22% of the significant variants showed allelic effects in both A549 (adenocarcinoma) and H520 (squamous cell carcinoma) cell lines, a subset of the functional variants displayed a significant cell-type interaction. Transcription factor analyses nominated potential regulators of the functional variants, including those with cell-type-specific expression and those predicted to bind multiple potentially functional variants across the GWAS loci. Linking functional variants to target genes based on four complementary approaches identified candidate susceptibility genes, including those affecting lung cancer cell growth. CRISPR interference of the top functional variant at 20q13.33 validated variant-to-gene connections, including RTEL1, SOX18, and ARFRP1. Our data provide a comprehensive functional analysis of lung cancer GWAS loci and help elucidate the molecular basis of heterogeneity and polygenicity underlying lung cancer susceptibility.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento , Herencia Multifactorial/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Alelos , Células A549RESUMEN
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), a preparation of polyclonal serum IgG pooled from numerous blood donors, has been used for nearly three decades and is proving to be an efficient treatment for many autoimmune blistering diseases, including pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Despite its widespread use and therapeutic success, its mechanisms of action are not completely understood. Some of its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory actions have been studied. In this study, the authors present a twenty-year follow-up of 21 patients with clinical and immunopathological confirmed PV, treated with IVIg as monotherapy, according to an established published protocol. IVIg therapy produced long-term sustained, clinical, serological, and immunopathological remission. For 20 y, these patients received no drugs and experienced no disease. This observation suggests that there was the establishment of immune balance or restoration of immune regulation in these PV patients. Twelve (57%) patients experienced no relapse during follow-up. Six (29%) patients experienced a relapse due to acute stress or post-coronavirus infection and/or vaccination. Reinstitution of IVIg resulted in prompt sustained recovery. Three (14.2%) patients, in clinical and serological remission, died due to unrelated causes. No severe adverse effects from IVIg were documented in all 21 patients. The simultaneous or sequential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of IVIg may have influenced the long-term clinical remission observed. This study provides a human prototype to examine the pathophysiology of autoimmunity and a model to study immune regulation and mechanisms that can facilitate restoring immune tolerance.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Pénfigo , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Tolerancia Inmunológica , AntiinflamatoriosRESUMEN
Celiac disease is a common gastrointestinal condition with an estimated global prevalence of up to 1%. Adequate long-term surveillance of patients is imperative to ensure strict adherence to treatment with a gluten-free diet and the ensuing clinical and histologic recovery. Traditionally, this has been accomplished by means of regular on-site attendance at specialist health care facilities, accompanied for most patients by follow-up endoscopic and laboratory tests. However, the rapidly increasing prevalence of celiac disease and the limited health care resources challenge the current centralized and nonindividualized follow-up strategies. The improved noninvasive surveillance tools and online health care services are further changing the landscape of celiac disease management. There is a clear need for more personalized and on-demand follow-up based on early treatment response and patient-related factors associated with long-term prognosis. Additional scientific evidence on the optimal implementation of follow-up for pediatric and adulthood celiac disease is nevertheless called for.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca , Dieta Sin Gluten , Salud Global , Enfermedad Celíaca/epidemiología , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Celíaca/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Celíaca/terapia , Humanos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
In preclinical studies, accurate monitoring of tumor dynamics is crucial for understanding cancer biology and evaluating therapeutic interventions. Traditional methods like caliper measurements and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) have limitations, prompting the need for improved imaging techniques. This study introduces a fast-scan high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) protocol for the longitudinal assessment of syngeneic breast tumor grafts in mice, comparing its performance with caliper, BLI measurements and with histological analysis. The E0771 mammary gland tumor cell line, engineered to express luciferase, was orthotopically grafted into immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. Tumor growth was monitored longitudinally at multiple timepoints using caliper measurement, HFUS, and BLI, with the latter two modalities assessed against histopathological standards post-euthanasia. The HFUS protocol was designed for rapid, anesthesia-free scanning, focusing on volume estimation, echogenicity, and necrosis visualization. All mice developed tumors, only 20.6% were palpable at day 4. HFUS detected tumors as small as 2.2 mm in average diameter from day 4 post-implantation, with an average scanning duration of 47 s per mouse. It provided a more accurate volume assessment than caliper, with a lower average bias relative to reference tumor volume. HFUS also revealed tumor necrosis, correlating strongly with BLI in terms of tumor volume and cellularity. Notable discrepancies between HFUS and BLI growth rates were attributed to immune cell infiltration. The fast HFUS protocol enables precise and efficient tumor assessment in preclinical studies, offering significant advantages over traditional methods in terms of speed, accuracy, and animal welfare, aligning with the 3R principle in animal research.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Mamarias Animales , Animales , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ultrasonografía , Línea Celular Tumoral , NecrosisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) is associated with the severity and mortality in patients with stroke, but the associations in different stroke subtypes remain unexplored. METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective cohort analysis on patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack enrolled in the Third China National Stroke Registry. We applied logistic models to assess the association of mtDNA-CN with functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 3-6 versus 0-2) and Cox proportional hazard models to assess the association with stroke recurrence (treating mortality as a competing risk) and mortality during a 12-month follow-up, adjusting for sex, age, physical activity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission, history of stroke and peripheral artery disease, small artery occlusion, and interleukin-6. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and stroke subtypes were conducted. RESULTS: The Third China National Stroke Registry enrolled 15â 166 patients, of which 10â 241 with whole-genome sequencing data were retained (mean age, 62.2 [SD, 11.2] years; 68.8% men). The associations between mtDNA-CN and poststroke/transient ischemic attack outcomes were specific to patients aged ≤65 years, with lower mtDNA-CN significantly associated with stroke recurrence in 12 months (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.15 per SD lower mtDNA-CN [95% CI, 1.04-1.27]; P=5.2×10-3) and higher all-cause mortality in 3 months (hazard ratio, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.41-3.39]; P=5.0×10-4). Across subtypes, the associations of mtDNA-CN with stroke recurrence were specific to stroke of undetermined cause (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.11-1.48]; P=6.6×10-4). In particular, lower mtDNA-CN was associated with poorer functional outcomes in stroke of undetermined cause patients diagnosed with embolic stroke of undetermined source (odds ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.20-1.94]; P=5.4×10-4), which remained significant after excluding patients with recurrent stroke (odds ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.14-1.94]; P=3.0×10-3). CONCLUSIONS: Lower mtDNA-CN is associated with higher stroke recurrence rate and all-cause mortality, as well as poorer functional outcome at follow-up, among stroke of undetermined cause, embolic stroke of undetermined source, and younger patients.
RESUMEN
Loss to follow-up (LTFU) within cervical screening programmes can result in missed clinically relevant lesions, potentially reducing programme effectiveness. To examine the health impact of losing women during the screening process, we determined the proportion of women LTFU per step of the Dutch hrHPV-based screening programme. We then determined the probability of being LTFU by age, screening history and sampling method (self- or clinician-sampled) using logistic regression analysis. Finally, we estimated the number of missed CIN2+/3+ lesions per LTFU moment by using the CIN-risk in women compliant with follow-up. Data from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga) was used. Women eligible for screening in 2017 and 2018 were included (N = 840,428). For clinician collected (CC) samples, the highest proportion LTFU was found following 'referral advice for colposcopy' (5.5% after indirect referral; 3.8% after direct referral). For self-sampling, the highest proportions LTFU were found following the advice for repeat cytology (13.6%) and after referral advice for colposcopy (8.2% after indirect referral; 4.3% after direct referral). Self-sampling users and women with no screening history had a higher LTFU-risk (OR: 3.87, CI: 3.55-4.23; OR: 1.39, CI: 1.20-1.61) compared to women that used CC sampling and women that have been screened before, respectively. Of all women LTFU in 2017/18, the total number of potentially missed CIN2+ was 844 (21% of women LTFU). Most lesions were missed after 'direct referral for colposcopy' (N = 462, 11.5% of women LTFU). So, this indicates a gap between the screening programme and clinical care which requires further attention, by improving monitoring of patients after referral.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Displasia del Cuello del Útero , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Colposcopía , Tamizaje Masivo , Frotis Vaginal/métodos , PapillomaviridaeRESUMEN
Administrative claims databases often do not capture date or fact of death, so studies using these data may inappropriately treat death as a censoring event-equivalent to other withdrawal reasons-rather than a competing event. We examined 1-, 3-, and 5-year inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted cumulative risks of a composite cardiovascular outcome among 34,527 initiators of telmisartan (exposure) and ramipril (referent) ages ≥55 in Optum claims from 2003 to 2020. Differences in cumulative risks of the cardiovascular endpoint due to censoring of death (cause-specific), as compared to treating death as a competing event (sub-distribution), increased with greater follow-up time and older age, where event and mortality risks were higher. Among ramipril users (selected results), 5-year cause-specific and sub-distribution cumulative risk estimates per 100, respectively, were 16.4 (95% CI 15.3, 17.5) and 16.2 (95% CI 15.1, 17.3) among ages 55-64 (difference=0.2) and were 43.2 (95% CI 41.3, 45.2) and 39.7 (95% CI 37.9, 41.4) among ages ≥75 (difference=3.6). Plasmode simulation results demonstrated the differences in cause-specific versus sub-distribution cumulative risks to increase with increasing mortality rate. We suggest researchers consider the cohort's baseline mortality risk when deciding whether real-world data with incomplete death information can be used without concern.
RESUMEN
Person-generated health data (PGHD) are valuable to study outcomes relevant to everyday living, to obtain information not otherwise available, for long-term follow-up and in situations where decisions cannot wait for traditional clinical research to be completed. While there is no dispute that these data are subject to bias, insights gained may be better than an information void, provided the biases are understood and acknowledged. People will share information known uniquely to them about exposures that may affect drug tolerance, safety and effectiveness, e.g., using non-prescription and complementary medications, alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, exercise, etc. Patients may be the best source of safety information when long-term follow-up is needed, e.g., the 5-15-year follow-up required for some gene therapies. Validation studies must be performed to evaluate what people can accurately report and when supplementary confirmation information is needed. But PGHD has already proven valuable in quantifying and contrasting COVID-19 vaccine benefits and risks, and for evaluating disease transmission and the accuracy of COVID-19 testing. Going forward, PGHD will be used for patient-measured and patient-relevant outcomes, including regulatory purposes, and will be linked to broader health data networks using tokenization, becoming a mainstay for signals about risks and benefits for diverse populations.
RESUMEN
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of haematological cancers with generally poor clinical outcomes. However, a subset of patients experience durable disease control, and little is known regarding long-term outcomes. The International T-cell Lymphoma Project (ITCLP) is the largest prospectively collected cohort of patients with PTCLs, providing insight into clinical outcomes at academic medical centres globally. We performed a long-term outcome analysis on patients from the ITCLP with available 10-year follow-up data (n = 735). The overall response rate to first-line therapy was 68%, while 5- and 10-year overall survival estimates were 49% and 40% respectively. Most deaths occurred prior to 5 years, and for patients alive at 5 years, the chance of surviving to 10 years was 84%. However, lymphoma remained the leading cause of death in the 5- to 10-year period (67%). Low-risk International Prognostic Index and Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma scores both identified patients with improved survival, while in multivariate analysis, age >60 years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-4 were associated with inferior outcomes. The favourable survival seen in patients achieving durable initial disease control emphasizes the unmet need for optimal front-line therapeutic approaches in PTCLs.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Humanos , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/terapia , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pronóstico , Adulto Joven , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have drastically improved the outcomes of pCML (paediatric CML) but data on long-term off-target toxicities of TKIs in children are scarce. In this single-centre, retrospective cum prospective study of pCML in chronic phase, we report our experience of treating 173 children with imatinib and following them for long-term toxicities. Mean (SD) time to attain CHR, CCyR and MMR were 3.05 (2.1), 10.6 (8.4) and 43.4 (31.8) months respectively. DMR was not attained in 59 (34%) patients at last follow-up. Ten patients were switched to second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs; nilotinib = 1/dasatinib = 9) due to poor/loss in response, of which seven had kinase domain mutations. Three patients progressed to the blastic phase. At a median follow-up of 84 (3-261) months, the 5-year EFS and OS for the entire cohort were 96.9% (95% CI: 93.4-100) and 98.7% (95% CI: 96.9-100) respectively. Screening for long-term toxicities revealed low bone density and hypovitaminosis D in 70% and 80% respectively. Other late effects included short stature (27%), delayed puberty (15%), poor sperm quality (43%) and miscellaneous endocrinopathies (8%). Children younger than 5 years at diagnosis were more susceptible to growth and endocrine toxicities (p = 0.009). Regular monitoring for long-term toxicities, timely intervention and trial of discontinuation whenever feasible are likely to improve the long-term outlook of pCML.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Dasatinib , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Semen , Resultado del Tratamiento , PreescolarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity after long-term follow-up of anti-PD-1 antibody in advanced melanoma with predominantly acral and mucosal subtypes. METHODS AND PATIENTS: In the POLARIS-01 phase II trial, 128 Chinese patients with advanced melanoma refractory to standard therapy received toripalimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for ≤2 years. For those who progressed after discontinuation due to 2-year treatment completion, rechallenge was allowed. The primary objectives were safety and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: As of February 8, 2021, ORR was 17.3% (95% CI: 11.2-25.0) evaluated by the independent radiologic review committee. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with known melanoma subtypes was 16.3 m for acral, 41.5 m for nonacral cutaneous, and 10.3 m for mucosal melanoma. Thereafter, the evaluation was continued by investigators. As of November 4, 2022, 5 years after the last enrollment, median duration of response was 15.6 months (range, 3.7-64.5+), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.3), and 60-month OS rate was 28.5% (95% CI: 20.2-37.2). Thirteen patients completed a 2-year treatment of toripalimab, with the subtypes of acral (2/13), non-acral cutaneous (4/13), mucosal (3/13) and unknown primary (4/13). Five patients were rechallenged. Four of them, all of whom were non-mucosal, completed the rechallenge course of 2 years with PFSâ ≥â 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest prospective anti-PD-1 trial with mature data in advanced melanoma in China. Toripalimab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and durable clinical response in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma who had failed in standard therapy. Immunotherapy seems less efficacious for long-term responders with mucosal primaries as rechallenge therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Melanoma , Terapia Recuperativa , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China , Adulto Joven , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, both incidence and mortality of cervical cancer are relatively high. Screening services, which were implemented during the past few years, are currently being expanded. The World Health Organization recommends patients with a positive VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) result should immediately receive treatment followed by rescreening after 1 year as precancerous lesions can reoccur or become residential despite treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screening logbooks dating between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed in 14 health facilities of Addis Ababa and Oromia region. Data for 741 women with a VIA-positive result were extracted and those women were asked to participate in a questionnaire-based phone interview to gain insights about adherence to treatment and follow-up. Data were analyzed using descriptive methods and then fitted into 2 generalized linear models to test variables for an influence on adherence to follow up. RESULTS: Around 13 800 women had received a VIA screening, of which approximately 820 (5.9%) were VIA positive. While over 90% of women with a positive screen received treatment, only about half of the treated patients returned for a follow-up examination. After treatment, 31 women had a VIA-positive re-screen. We found that educational status, age over 40, no/incorrect follow-up appointment, health facility-related barriers, and use of reminders are important drivers of adherence to follow up. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that adherence to treatment after VIA positive screening is relatively high whereas adherence to follow up recommendations still needs improvement. Reminders like appointment cards and phone calls can effectively reduce the loss of follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Precancerosas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Etiopía/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones Precancerosas/terapia , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been uncertain. RADICALS-RT compared efficacy and safety of adjuvant RT versus an observation policy with salvage RT for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RADICALS-RT was a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with ≥1 risk factor (pT3/4, Gleason 7-10, positive margins, preoperative PSA≥10 ng/ml) for recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to adjuvant RT ('Adjuvant-RT') or an observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure ('Salvage-RT') defined as PSA≥0.1 ng/ml or three consecutive rises. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned RT schedule (52.5 Gy/20 fractions or 66 Gy/33 fractions) and treatment centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom-from-distant-metastasis (FFDM), designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with Salvage-RT (control) to 95% at 10 years with Adjuvant-RT. Secondary outcome measures were biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used; hazard ratio (HR)<1 favours Adjuvant-RT. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and December 2016, 1396 participants from UK, Denmark, Canada and Ireland were randomised: 699 Salvage-RT, 697 Adjuvant-RT. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years. Ninety-three percent (649/697) Adjuvant-RT reported RT within 6 months after randomisation; 39% (270/699) Salvage-RT reported RT during follow-up. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. With 80 distant metastasis events, 10-year FFDM was 93% for Adjuvant-RT and 90% for Salvage-RT: HR=0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.07, P=0.095]. Of 109 deaths, 17 were due to prostate cancer. Overall survival was not improved (HR=0.980, 95% CI 0.667-1.440, P=0.917). Adjuvant-RT reported worse urinary and faecal incontinence 1 year after randomisation (P=0.001); faecal incontinence remained significant after 10 years (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Long-term results from RADICALS-RT confirm adjuvant RT after radical prostatectomy increases the risk of urinary and bowel morbidity, but does not meaningfully improve disease control. An observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION: RADICALS, RADICALS-RT, ISRCTN40814031, NCT00541047.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Terapia Recuperativa , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Clasificación del Tumor , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab+ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and durable response benefits versus sunitinib (SUN) with long-term follow-up in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report updated analyses with 8 years median follow-up from CheckMate 214. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with aRCC (N=1096) were randomized to NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × four doses, followed by NIVO (3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W); or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off. Endpoints included OS, and independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate/poor-risk (I/P; primary), intent-to-treat (ITT; secondary), and favorable-risk (FAV; exploratory) patients. RESULTS: With 8 years (99.1 months) median follow-up, the HR (95% CI) for OS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 0.72 (0.62-0.83) in ITT patients, 0.69 (0.59-0.81) in I/P patients, and 0.82 (0.60-1.13) in FAV patients. PFS probabilities at 90 months were 22.8% versus 10.8% (ITT), 25.4% versus 8.5% (I/P), and 12.7% versus 17.0% (FAV), respectively. ORR with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 39.5% versus 33.0% (ITT), 42.4% versus 27.5% (I/P), and 29.6% versus 51.6% (FAV). Rates of complete response were higher with NIVO+IPI versus SUN in all IMDC risk groups (ITT, 12.0% versus 3.5%; I/P, 11.8% versus 2.6%; FAV, 12.8% versus 6.5%). Median duration of response (95% CI) with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 76.2 versus 25.1 months [59.1-not estimable (NE) versus 19.8-33.2; ITT], 82.8 versus 19.8 months [54.1-NE versus 16.4-26.4; I/P], and 61.5 versus 33.2 months [27.8-NE versus 24.8-51.4; FAV]). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events was consistent with previous reports. Exploratory post hoc analyses are reported for FAV patients, those receiving subsequent therapy based on their response status, clinical subpopulations, and adverse events over time. CONCLUSIONS: Superior survival, durable response benefits, and a manageable safety profile were maintained with NIVO+IPI versus SUN at 8 years, the longest phase III follow-up for a first-line checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in aRCC.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Despite limited evidence supporting its effectiveness, most guidelines recommend long-term, routinely scheduled in-person surveillance of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased use of virtual care. This survey evaluated patient perspectives on follow-up care. METHODS: Patients with EBC undergoing surveillance were surveyed about follow-up protocols, perceptions, and interest in clinical trials assessing different follow-up strategies. RESULTS: Of 402 approached patients 270 completed the survey (response rate 67%). Median age 62.5 years (range 25-86) and median time since breast cancer diagnosis was 3.8 years (range < 1-33 years). Most (n = 148/244, 60%) were followed by more than one provider. Routine follow-ups with breast examination were mostly conducted by medical/radiation oncologists every 6 months (n = 110/236, 46%) or annually (n = 106/236, 44%). Participants felt routine follow-up was useful to monitor for recurrence, manage side effects of cancer treatment and to provide support/reassurance. Most participants felt regular follow-up care would detect recurrent cancer earlier (n = 214/255, 96%) and increase survival (n = 218/249, 88%). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of in-person visits for 54% of patients (n = 63/117). Patients were concerned this reduction of in-person visits would lead to later detection of both local (n = 29/63, 46%) and distant recurrences (n = 25/63, 40%). While many felt their medical and radiation oncologists were the most suited to provide follow-up care, 55% felt comfortable having their primary care provider (PCP) conduct surveillance. When presented with a scenario where follow-up has no effect on earlier detection or survival, 70% of patients still wanted routine in-person follow-up for reassurance (63%) with the goal of earlier recurrence detection (56%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited evidence of effectiveness of routine in-person assessment, patients continue to place importance on regularly scheduled in-person follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pandemias , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To offer an extensive retrospective experience on the management of male breast cancer. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including male patients diagnosed with breast cancer (invasive or in situ) in 12 Italian breast units from January 1975 to December 2019. Patients aged 18 years or older were assessed for eligibility. Exclusion criteria were metastatic cancer at diagnosis, previous cancer(s), received neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete data on (neo) adjuvant treatment(s), and/or follow-up data. Data on radiological examinations, demographic characteristics, risk factors, histological features, receptor status, treatments, and follow-up were collected. RESULTS: In a series of 671 male patients with breast cancer assessed for eligibility, 403 (28 in situ and 375 invasive neoplasms) were included in the study. All included patients underwent surgery. The median age at surgery was 63.8 years (IQR 56.1-72.1). In 68% of cases, patients underwent echography, and in 55.1%, a mammography. Most patients were ER and PR positive (63.8%), HER2 negative (80.4%), with high (≥ 20%) Ki67 values (61.3%), and luminal B subtype (51.1%). The 10-year overall survival was 73.6% (95% CI 67.0-79.1) for invasive breast cancer and 90% (95% CI 65.6-97.4) for in situ breast cancer. In patients with invasive breast cancer, at univariable analysis, having a G3 tumor (vs. G1), pT2/3/4 (vs. pT1), pN2/3 (vs. pN0), luminal B subtype with Ki67 ≥ 20% (vs. Luminal A), were significantly associated with a higher risk of death. In multivariable analyses, pT2/3/4 (vs. pT1) remained significantly associated with a higher risk of death (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.83-5.39), and having a HER2 positive or a triple-negative subtype (vs. Luminal A) was also significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR 4.76, 95% CI 1.26-18.1). CONCLUSION: Male breast cancer is a rare disease, the better understanding of which is necessary for a more effective diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ductal-carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive form of breast cancer with good prognosis. Follow-up guidelines in the Netherlands are currently the same as for invasive breast cancer. Due to fear of invasive breast cancer or recurrence, it is hypothesized that follow-up for DCIS after treatment is more intense in practice resulting in potentially unnecessary high costs. This study investigates the follow-up in practice for patients with DCIS compared to the recommendations in order to inform clinicians and policy makers how to utilize these guidelines. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with pure DCIS between 2004 and 2014 were followed up until 2018. Information on duration and frequency of follow-up visits, reasons and decision makers for shortening, and prolonging follow-up was collected. Prolonged follow-up was defined as deviation from the Dutch guideline: more than 5 years of follow-up and older than 60 years. RESULTS: Of the 227 patients the mean number of visits per year was 1.4 and mean years of follow-up was 6.0. Thirty-three percent had prolonged follow-up and 26% shorter follow-up than recommended. A majority (78%) of decision for prolonged follow-up was being made by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Follow-up duration is in almost half of patients with DCIS according to guidelines and with most prolonged follow-up only up to a year longer than recommended. In most cases suspicious findings and the timing of the population screening program appeared to cause prolonged follow-up. If accepted by patients and clinicians, future DCIS specific guidelines should address these reasons and tailor to the individual risks.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Follow-up guidelines barely diverge from a one-size-fits-all approach, even though the risk of recurrence differs per patient. However, the personalization of breast cancer care improves outcomes for patients. This study explores the variation in follow-up pathways in the Netherlands using real-world data to determine guideline adherence and the gap between daily practice and risk-based surveillance, to demonstrate the benefits of personalized risk-based surveillance compared with usual care. METHODS: Patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer who received surgical treatment in a general hospital between 2005 and 2020 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and included all imaging activities during follow-up from hospital-based electronic health records. Process analysis techniques were used to map patients and activities to investigate the real-world utilisation of resources and identify the opportunities for improvement. The INFLUENCE 2.0 nomogram was used for risk prediction of recurrence. RESULTS: In the period between 2005 and 2020, 3478 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.9 years. In the first 12 months following treatment, patients visited the hospital between 1 and 5 times (mean 1.3, IQR 1-1) and received between 1 and 9 imaging activities (mean 1.7, IQR 1-2). Mammogram was the prevailing imaging modality, accounting for 70% of imaging activities. Patients with a low predicted risk of recurrence visited the hospital more often. CONCLUSIONS: Deviations from the guideline were not in line with the risk of recurrence and revealed a large gap, indicating that it is hard for clinicians to accurately estimate this risk and therefore objective risk predictions could bridge this gap.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Mamografía , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , NomogramasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We present findings from an assessment of award recipients' partners from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). We describe partners' processes of identifying and tracking patients undergoing stool-based screening. METHODS: We analyzed data from eight CRCCP award recipients purposively sampled and their partner health systems from 2019 to 2023. The data included number of stool-based tests distributed and returned; abnormal findings; referrals and completion of follow-up colonoscopies; and colonoscopy findings. We also report on strategies to improve tracking of stool-based tests and facilitation of follow-up colonoscopies. RESULTS: Five of eight CRCCP award recipients reported that all or some partner health systems were able to report stool test return rates. Six had health systems that were able to report abnormal stool test findings. Two reported that health systems could track time to follow-up colonoscopy completion from date of referral, while four could report colonoscopy completion but not the timeframe. Follow-up colonoscopy completion varied substantially from 24.2 to 75.5% (average of 47.9%). Strategies to improve identifying and tracking screening focused mainly on the use of electronic medical records; strategies to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy were multi-level. CONCLUSION: Health systems vary in their ability to track steps in the stool-based screening process and few health systems can track time to completion of follow-up colonoscopy. Longer time intervals can result in more advanced disease. CRCCP-associated health systems participating in this study could support the implementation of multicomponent strategies at the individual, provider, and health system levels to improve tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy.
RESUMEN
The primary aim of this study was to determine the upgrade rates of variant lobular carcinoma in situ (V-LCIS, ie, combined florid [F-LCIS] and pleomorphic [P-LCIS]) compared with classic LCIS (C-LCIS) when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The secondary goal was to determine the rate of progression/development of invasive carcinoma on long-term follow-up after primary excision. After institutional review board approval, our institutional pathology database was searched for patients with "pure" LCIS diagnosed on CNB who underwent subsequent excision. Radiologic findings were reviewed, radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) correlation was performed, and follow-up patient outcome data were obtained. One hundred twenty cases of LCIS were identified on CNB (C-LCIS = 97, F-LCIS = 18, and P-LCIS = 5). Overall upgrade rates after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS were 14% (14/97), 44% (8/18), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Of the total cases, 79 (66%) were deemed rad-path concordant. Of these, the upgrade rate after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS was 7.5% (5 of 66), 40% (4 of 10), and 0% (0 of 3), respectively. The overall upgrade rate for V-LCIS was higher than for C-LCIS (P = .004), even for the cases deemed rad-path concordant (P value: .036). Most upgraded cases (23 of 24) showed pT1a disease or lower. With an average follow-up of 83 months, invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast was identified in 8/120 (7%) cases. Six patients had died: 2 of (contralateral) breast cancer and 4 of other causes. Because of a high upgrade rate, V-LCIS diagnosed on CNB should always be excised. The upgrade rate for C-LCIS (even when rad-path concordant) is higher than reported in many other studies. Rad-path concordance read, surgical consultation, and individualized decision making are recommended for C-LCIS cases. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma after LCIS diagnosis is small (7% with â¼7-year follow-up), but active surveillance is required to diagnose early-stage disease.