Symbolic fractions elicit an analog magnitude representation in school-age children.

A fundamental question about fractions is whether they are grounded in an abstract nonsymbolic magnitude code similar to that postulated for whole numbers. Mounting evidence suggests that symbolic fractions could be grounded in mechanisms for perceiving nonsymbolic ratio magnitudes. However, systematic examination of such mechanisms in children has been lacking. We asked second- and fifth-grade children (prior to and after formal instructions with fractions, respectively) to compare pairs of symbolic fractions, nonsymbolic ratios, and mixed symbolic-nonsymbolic pairs. This paradigm allowed us to test three key questions: (a) whether children show an analog magnitude code for rational numbers, (b) whether that code is compatible with mental representations of symbolic fractions, and (c) how formal education with fractions affects the symbolic-nonsymbolic relation. We examined distance effects as a marker of analog ratio magnitude processing and notation effects as a marker of converting across numerical codes. Second and fifth graders' reaction times and error rates showed classic distance and notation effects. Nonsymbolic ratios were processed most efficiently, with mixed and symbolic notations being relatively slower. Children with more formal instruction in symbolic fractions had a significant advantage in comparing symbolic fractions but had a smaller advantage for nonsymbolic ratio stimuli. Supplemental analyses showed that second graders relied on numerator distance more than holistic distance and that fifth graders relied on holistic fraction magnitude distance more than numerator distance. These results suggest that children have a nonsymbolic ratio magnitude code and that symbolic fractions can be translated into that magnitude code.

Attitudes Toward Math Are Differentially Related to the Neural Basis of Multiplication Depending on Math Skill.

Attitudes towards math (ATM) predict math achievement. Negative ATM are associated with avoidance of math content, while positive ATM are associated with exerting more effort on math tasks. Recent literature highlights the importance of considering interactions between ATM and math skill in examining relations to achievement. This study investigated, for the first time, the effects of the interaction between math skill and ATM on the neurocognitive basis of arithmetic processing. We examined the effect of this interaction using a single-digit multiplication task in 9- to 12-year-old children. Results showed that higher math skill was correlated with less activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and positive ATM were correlated with less activation in the left IFG. The relation between ATM and the neural basis of multiplication varied depending on math skill. Only among children with lower math skill, positive ATM were associated with greater activation of the left IFG. The results suggest that positive ATM in low skill children might encourage them to more fully engage the neurocognitive systems underlying controlled effort and retrieval of multiplication facts. Our results highlight the importance of examining the role of both attitudinal and cognitive factors on the neural basis of arithmetic development.

No calculation necessary: Accessing magnitude through decimals and fractions.

Research on how humans understand the relative magnitude of symbolic fractions presents a unique case of the symbol-grounding problem with numbers. Specifically, how do people access a holistic sense of rational number magnitude from decimal fractions (e.g. 0.125) and common fractions (e.g. 1/8)? Researchers have previously suggested that people cannot directly access magnitude information from common fraction notation, but instead must use a form of calculation to access this meaning. Questions remain regarding the nature of calculation and whether a division-like conversion to decimals is a necessary process that permits access to fraction magnitudes. To test whether calculation is necessary to access fractions magnitudes, we carried out a series of six parallel experiments in which we examined how adults access the magnitude of rational numbers (decimals and common fractions) under varying task demands. We asked adult participants to indicate which of two fractions was larger in three different conditions: decimal-decimal, fraction-fraction, and mixed decimal-fraction pairs. Across experiments, we manipulated two aspects of the task demands. 1) Response windows were limited to 1, 2 or 5 s, and 2) participants either did or did not have to identify when the two stimuli were the same magnitude (catch trials). Participants were able to successfully complete the task even at a response window of 1 s and showed evidence of holistic magnitude processing. These results indicate that calculation strategies with fractions are not necessary for accessing a sense of a fractions meaning but are strategic routes to magnitude that participants may use when granted sufficient time. We suggest that rapid magnitude processing with fractions and decimals may occur by mapping symbolic components onto common amodal mental representations of rational numbers.