Plain language review: what are biosimilar medicines and how can they be used to treat people with cancer?

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: The aim of this plain language review article is to help you to understand biosimilar medicines (called biosimilars) by giving a summary of biologic medicines and biosimilars. It is based on the experience of an international panel of physicians with expertise on biosimilars who discussed and agreed on the topics and information included in this review article. Biologic medicines are medicines that come from living organisms such as bacteria and animal or plant cells. Biosimilars are a group of approved biologic medicines that are similar to original biologic medicines that are already available. This review explains how biosimilars are developed and approved, and how they are used to treat people with cancer. It also answers some common important questions people with cancer might have when taking biosimilars. The purpose of this plain language review is to help you to understand the findings from recent research. This review reports information from peer-reviewed literature and other sources available in the public domain (e.g., regulatory documents or product information labels). The findings may differ from those of other review articles. Health professionals should make treatment decisions based on all available evidence.

Effect of nitric oxide-cyclic GMP-K+ channel pathway blockers, naloxone and metformin, on the antinociception induced by the diuretic pamabrom.

Pamabrom is a diuretic that is effective in treating premenstrual syndrome and primary dysmenorrhea. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of metformin and modulators of the opioid receptor-nitric oxide (NO)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-K+ channel pathway on the local antinociception induced by pamabrom. The rat paw 1% formalin test was used to assess the effects. Rats were treated with local administration of pamabrom (200-800 µg/paw) or indomethacin (200-800 µg/paw). The antinociception of pamabrom or indomethacin was evaluated with and without the local pretreatment of the blockers. Local administration of pamabrom and indomethacin produced dose-dependent antinociception during the second phase of the test. Local pretreatment of the paws with naloxone (50 µg/paw), l-nitro-arginine methyl ester (10-100 µg/paw), or 1H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo[4,2-a]quinoxalin-1-one (10-100 µg/paw) reverted the antinociception induced by local pamabrom, but not of indomethacin. Similarly, the K+ channel blockers glibenclamide, glipizide, 4-aminopyridine, tetraethylammonium, charybdotoxin, or apamin reverted the pamabrom-induced antinociception, but not of indomethacin. Metformin significantly blocked the antinociception of pamabrom and indomethacin. Our data suggest that pamabrom could activate the opioid receptor-NO-cGMP-K+ channel pathway to produce its peripheral antinociception in the formalin test. Likewise, a biguanide-dependent mechanism could be activated by pamabrom and indomethacin to generate antinociception.

Citral inhibits the nociception in the rat formalin test: effect of metformin and blockers of opioid receptor and the NO-cGMP-K+ channel pathway.

The objective of the present study was to scrutinize the effect of nitric oxide (NO), cyclic GMP (cGMP), potassium channel blockers, and metformin on the citral-produced peripheral antinociception. The rat paw 1% formalin test was used to assess nociception and antinociception. Rats were treated with local peripheral administration of citral (10-100 µg/paw). The antinociception of citral (100 µg/paw) was evaluated with and without the local pretreatment of naloxone, NG-L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, a NO synthesis inhibitor), 1H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo(4,2-a)quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, a soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor), metformin, opioid receptors antagonists, and K+ channel blockers. Injection of citral in the rat paw significantly decreased the nociceptive effect of formalin administration during the two phases of the test. Local pretreatment of the paws with L-NAME and ODQ did not reduced the citral-induced antinociception. Glipizide or glibenclamide (Kir6.1-2; ATP-sensitive K+ channel blockers), tetraethylammonium or 4-aminopyridine (KV; voltage-gated K+ channel blockers), charybdotoxin (KCa1.1; big conductance calcium-activated K+ channel blocker), apamin (KCa2.1-3; small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel antagonist), or metformin, but not the opioid antagonists, reduced the antinociception of citral. Citral produced peripheral antinociception during both phases of the formalin test. These effects were due to the activation of K+ channels and a biguanide-dependent mechanism.

Role of the NO-cGMP-K+ channels pathway in the peripheral antinociception induced by α-bisabolol.

The aim of this study was to examine if the peripheral antinociception of α-bisabolol involves the participation of nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) synthesis followed by K+ channel opening in the formalin test. Wistar rats were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with formalin (1%). Rats received a subcutaneous injection into the dorsal surface of the paw of vehicles or increasing doses of α-bisabolol (100-300 µg/paw). To determine whether the peripheral antinociception induced by α-bisabolol was mediated by either the opioid receptors or the NO-cGMP-K+ channels pathway, the effect of pretreatment (10 min before formalin injection) with the appropriate vehicles, naloxone, naltrexone, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,2-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), glibenclamide, glipizide, apamin, charybdotoxin, tetraethylammonium, or 4-aminopyridine on the antinociceptive effects induced by local peripheral α-bisabolol (300 µg/paw) were assessed. α-Bisabolol produced antinociception during both phases of the formalin test. α-Bisabolol antinociception was blocked by L-NAME, ODQ, and all the K+ channels blockers. The peripheral antinociceptive effect produced by α-bisabolol was not blocked by the opioid receptor inhibitors. α-Bisabolol was able to active the NO-cGMP-K+ channels pathway to produce its antinoceptive effect. The participation of opioid receptors in the peripheral local antinociception induced by α-bisabolol is excluded.

Toxicokinetics of temephos after oral administration to adult male rats.

Temephos (Tem) is the larvicide of choice to control mosquito transmission of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya. The toxicokinetic and toxicological information of temephos is very limited. The aim of this work was to determine the toxicokinetics and dosimetry of temephos and its metabolites. Male Wistar rats were orally administered temephos (300 mg/kg) emulsified with saline solution and sacrificed over time after dosing. Temephos and its metabolites were analyzed in blood and tissues by high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector. At least eleven metabolites were detected, including temephos-sulfoxide (Tem-SO), temephos-oxon (Tem-oxon), temephos-oxon-sulfoxide (Tem-oxon-SO), temephos-oxon-SO-monohydrolyzed (Tem-oxon-SO-OH), 4,4´-thiodiphenol, 4,4´-sulfinyldiphenol, and 4,4´-sulfonyldiphenol or bisphenol S (BPS). The mean blood concentrations of temephos were fitted to a one-compartment model for kinetic analysis. At 2 h, the peak was reached (t1/2 abs = 0.38 h), and only trace levels were detected at 36 h (t1/2 elim = 8.6 h). Temephos was detected in all tissues and preferentially accumulated in fat. Temephos-sulfone-monohydrolyzed (Tem-SO2-OH) blood levels remained constant until 36 h and gradually accumulated in the kidney. Tem-oxon was detected in the brain, liver, kidney, and fat. Clearance from the liver and kidney were 7.59 and 5.52 ml/min, respectively. These results indicate that temephos is well absorbed, extensively metabolized, widely distributed and preferentially stored in adipose tissue. It is biotransformed into reactive metabolites such as Tem-oxons, Tem-dioxons, and BPS. Tem-SO2-OH, the most abundant metabolite of temephos, could be used as an exposure biomarker for toxicokinetic modeling. These results could provide critical insight into the dosimetry and toxicity of temephos and its metabolites.

Synergistic protective effects between docosahexaenoic acid and omeprazole on the gastrointestinal tract in the indomethacin-induced injury model.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used drugs due to their antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic properties. However, NSAIDs can cause adverse reactions, mainly gastrointestinal damage. Omeprazole (OMP) exhibits gastroprotective activity, but its protection is limited at the intestinal level. For this reason, it is essential to utilize a combination of therapies that provide fewer adverse effects, such as the combined treatment of OMP and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and gastroprotective activities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacological interaction between DHA and OMP in a murine model of indomethacin-induced gastrointestinal damage. The gastroprotective and enteroprotective effects of DHA (0.3-10 mg/kg, p.o.), OMP (1-30 mg/kg, p.o.), or the combination treatment of both compounds (3-56.23 mg/kg, p.o.) were evaluated in the indomethacin-induced gastrointestinal damage model (30 mg/kg, p.o.). Since DHA and OMP exhibited a protective effect in a dose-responsive fashion, the ED30 for each individual compound was determined and a 1:1 combination of DHA and OMP was tested. Isobolographic analysis was used to determine any pharmacodynamic interactions. Since the effective experimental dose ED30 (Zexp) of the combined treatment of DHA and OMP was lower than the theoretical additive dose (Zadd; p < .05) in both the stomach and small intestine their protective effects were considered synergistic. These results indicate that the synergistic protective effects from combined treatment of DHA and OMP could be ideal for mitigating damage generated by NSAIDs at the gastrointestinal level.

Participation of the opioid receptor - nitric oxide - cGMP - K+ channel pathway in the peripheral antinociceptive effect of nalbuphine and buprenorphine in rats.

The aim of this study was to examine if the peripheral antinociceptive effects of the opioid agonist/antagonist nalbuphine and buprenorphine involve the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) synthesis followed by K+ channel opening in the formalin test. Wistar rats (180-220 g) were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with formalin (1%). Rats received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection into the dorsal surface of the paw of vehicles or increasing doses of nalbuphine (50-200 µg/paw) or buprenorphine (1-5 µg/paw) 20 min before formalin injection into the paw. Nalbuphine antinociception was reversed by the s.c. injection into the paw of the inhibitor of NO synthesis (NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)), by the inhibitor of guanylyl cyclase (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ)), by the Kir6.1-2, ATP-sensitive K+ channel inhibitors (glibenclamide and glipizide), by the KCa2.1-3, small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel blocker (apamin), by the KCa1.1, large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel blocker (charybdotoxin), and by the KV, voltage-dependent K+ channel inhibitors (4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA)). The antinociceptive effect produced by buprenorphine was blocked by the s.c. injection of 4-AP and TEA but not by L-NAME, ODQ, glibenclamide, glipizide, apamin, or charybdotoxin. The present results provide evidence for differences in peripheral mechanisms of action between these opioid drugs.

Limited sampling strategy to predict the area under the curve of tacrolimus in Mexican renal transplant pediatric patients receiving Prograf® or non-innovator formulations.

TDM of tacrolimus is usually performed with trough levels (C0h ). However, in pediatric patients, C0h may not be an adequate marker. The AUC is considered a more suitable indicator of drug exposure. As several blood samples are needed for the estimation of AUC, and LSS for predicting tacrolimus AUC and optimizing the dose adjustment have been proposed. Moreover, in emerging countries such as Mexico, non-innovator formulations, which bioequivalence has not been demonstrated, are frequently used. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a LSS to predict the tacrolimus AUC0-12h in Mexican pediatric kidney transplant recipients who received either Prograf® or non-innovator tacrolimus formulations. A total of 56 pharmacokinetic profiles were randomized into two groups: model development (n = 28) and model validation (n = 28). The limited sampling equations were obtained after a stepwise multiple regression using AUC as the dependent variable and tacrolimus blood concentrations, quantified by CMIA, at different time points as the independent variables. The final equation included observed concentrations at 1 hour (C1h ) and 4 hours (C4h ) after dose administration. The predictive performance of the model was adequate in terms of both, bias and precision. Results strongly suggest that the clinical use of this LSS could provide an ethical, cost-, and time-effective method in the TDM of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with kidney transplant. The model proved to be adequate with either Prograf® or non-innovator tacrolimus formulations of dubious bioequivalence.

Barriers towards effective pharmacovigilance systems of biosimilars in rheumatology: A Latin American survey.

PURPOSE: This review summarises the current status of regulatory guidelines for the approval of biosimilars in Latin America and highlights the main barriers to effective pharmacovigilance in this region. We also report results from a survey of Latin American rheumatologists assessing their understanding of prescribing biosimilars and the pharmacovigilance of these drugs. METHODS: We reviewed the current guidelines for the regulatory approval of biosimilars and barriers to effective pharmacovigilance in Latin American countries. Rheumatologists attending the II Pan-American League of Rheumatology Associations PANLAR Review Course (Biosimilars update) in Lima, Peru were asked to complete a short survey to determine their knowledge of biosimilars. RESULTS: Many Latin American countries continue to lag behind Europe and the United States in establishing regulatory guidance and effective pharmacovigilance systems for biosimilars. Results from our survey also highlight a lack of awareness regarding the availability of biosimilars, their nomenclature, automatic substitution, and reporting adverse drug reactions because of these drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The main barriers to effective pharmacovigilance in Latin America are the lack of consensus on the interchangeability of reference biologics and biosimilars, and the need for more suitably trained personnel to carry out effective postmarketing pharmacovigilance of biosimilars. Inconsistencies in biosimilar nomenclature make it difficult to adequately trace drugs and record adverse drug reactions associated with their use, creating a barrier to the global pharmacovigilance of biologics.

Practical Guidance on Biosimilars, With a Focus on Latin America: What Do Rheumatologists Need to Know?

BACKGROUND/HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: Availability of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has improved clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, but it also increased the cost of treatment. Biosimilars, the regulated copies of biologic products, have a potential to reduce health care costs and expand access to treatment. However, because of a complex development process, biosimilars can be considered only those noninnovator biologics with satisfactory supporting evidence (ranging from structural to clinical), as outlined in the recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO). In Latin America, a heterogeneous regulatory landscape and nonconsistent approval practices for biosimilars create decision-making challenges for practicing rheumatologists. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE: Most Latin American countries either have adopted or are in the process of adopting guidelines for the approval of biosimilars. However, among several marketed bDMARDs in the region, currently there are only 2 products that could be considered true biosimilars, based on the WHO criteria. The rest can be considered only intended copies, whose safety and efficacy are not fully established. One such product had to be withdrawn from the market because of safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Practicing rheumatologists in Latin America need to understand the regulatory situation for biosimilars in their countries. When considering bDMARDs that are not innovator products, clinicians should use only those that have been approved according to the WHO recommendations. For clarification, local health authorities or professional associations should be contacted.

Quality Comparison of Biosimilar and Copy Filgrastim Products with the Innovator Product.

PURPOSE: Filgrastim, a recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, is widely used to treat congenital and acquired neutropenia. Following patent expiration of the innovator filgrastim product, biosimilar filgrastim products have been approved in the EU and shown to be comparable with the innovator with respect to quality, safety and efficacy. In less regulated markets, copy filgrastim products are available but data about their quality are scarce. In the present study, we provide a head-to-head comparative study on the quality of biosimilar and copy filgrastim products. METHODS: Innovator filgrastim product, Neupogen®, two EU-licensed biosimilars, Zarzio® and Tevagrastim®, and two copy filgrastim products, Biocilin® and PDgrastim®, were subjected to peptide mapping, circular dichroism spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, high performance size-exclusion chromatography, reversed-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography, endotoxin test, flow imaging microscopy and in vitro potency assay. RESULTS: Zarzio® and Tevagrastim® have comparable quality to Neupogen®, while Biocilin® showed a significantly lower and PDgrastim® a higher specific activity. Moreover, PDgrastim® showed a higher level of impurities and a lower thermo stability than the other products. CONCLUSIONS: Except for the deviating specific activities of the two copy filgrastim products, we found no substantial differences in product quality between the filgrastim products studied.

Generic immunosuppressants.

Immunosuppressive drugs for solid organ transplantation are critical dose drugs with a narrow therapeutic index. Many of the most commonly used innovator drugs are off patent and have been replicated by generic counterparts, often at substantial cost-savings to the patient. However, serious adverse events caused by the transition from innovator to generic medications, specifically in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, have questioned these autosubstitutions. The purpose of this review is to summarize the criteria set forth by the regulatory bodies, and to examine how major immunosuppressive drugs conform to these recommendations. Regulatory bodies have established inconsistent criteria to demonstrate bioequivalence between innovator and generic medications, causing approved generic variations to have varying levels of equivalence with the innovator drugs. In order to minimize the risk for under-immunosuppression, the following recommendations have been concluded. Brand prescribing of cyclosporine and tacrolimus are recommended due to evidence of adverse events after conversion to generic formulations and differences in dissolution parameters. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) shows better bioequivalence between innovator and generic formulations, however caution should be advised when switching between formulations. The institution of 'innovator only' policies may be appropriate at this time in order to minimize the risk of under-immunosuppressing patients until the evidence of more stringent bioequivalence has been established.

Time-dependent changes in paw carrageenan-induced inflammation above and below the level of low thoracic spinal cord injury in rats.

STUDY DESIGN: This was an animal study. OBJECTIVES: Local inflammation is attenuated below high thoracic SCI, where innervation of major lymphoid organs is involved. However, whether inflammatory responses are affected after low thoracic SCI, remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to characterize the influence of low thoracic SCI on carrageenan-induced paw swelling in intact and paralyzed limbs, at acute and subacute stages. SETTING: University and hospital-based research center, Mexico City, Mexico. METHODS: Rats received a severe contusive SCI at T9 spinal level or sham injury. Then, 1 and 15 days after lesion, carrageenan or vehicle was subcutaneously injected in forelimb and hindlimb paws. Paw swelling was measured over a 6-h period using a plethysmometer. RESULTS: Swelling increased progressively reaching the maximum 6 h post-carrageenan injection. Swelling increase in sham-injured rats was approximately 130% and 70% compared with baseline values of forelimbs and hindlimbs, respectively. Paws injected with saline exhibited no measurable swelling. Carrageenan-induced paw swelling 1-day post-SCI was suppressed in both intact and paralyzed limbs. Fifteen days post-injury, the swelling response to carrageenan was completely reestablished in forelimbs, whereas in hindlimbs it remained significantly attenuated compared with sham-injured rats. CONCLUSIONS: SCI at low spinal level affects the induced swelling response in a different way depending on both, the neurological status of challenged regions and the stage of injury. These findings suggest that neurological compromise of the main immunological organs is not a prerequisite for the local swelling response to be affected after injury.

Pharmacological interaction of α-bisabolol and diclofenac on nociception, inflammation, and gastric integrity in rats.

Preclinical Research & Development The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with herbal products having analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects may increase their beneficial effects and limit their side effects. In this study, the effects of an interaction between α-bisabolol and the NSAID, diclofenac on nociception (formalin test), inflammation (paw inflammation produced by carrageenan) and gastric injury in rat was assessed. Diclofenac, α-bisabolol, or diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations produced antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in rat (p < .05). The systemic administration of diclofenac, but not α-bisabolol, produced gastric damage while the diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations produced limited gastric damage. Effective dose (ED40 ) values were determined for each individual drug and analyzed isobolographically. The theoretical ED40 values for the antinociceptive (98.89 mg/kg) and the anti-inflammatory (41.2 mg/kg) effects differed from the experimental ED40 values (antinociception: 38.7 mg/kg and anti-inflammation: 13.4 mg/kg). We concluded that the interactions between diclofenac and α-bisabolol are synergistic. These data suggest that the diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations can interact to produce minor gastric damage, thereby offering a safer therapeutic alternative for the clinical management of inflammation and/or inflammatory pain.

Supra-Additive Interaction of Docosahexaenoic Acid and Naproxen and Gastric Safety on the Formalin Test in Rats.

Preclinical Research The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics-nociception-of naproxen in rats, as well as to determine the gastric safety resulting from this combination versus naproxen alone. Female Wistar rats were orally administered DHA, naproxen or the DHA-naproxen mixture at fixed-ratio combination of 1:3. The antinociceptive effect was evaluated using the formalin test. The gastric injury was determined 3 h after naproxen administration. An isobolographic analysis was performed to characterize the antinociceptive interaction between DHA and naproxen. To determine the possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions, the oral bioavailability of naproxen was evaluated in presence and absence of oral DHA. The experimental effective dose ED30 values (Zexp) were decreased from theoretical additive dose values (Zadd; P < 0.05). The isobolographic analysis showed that the combination exhibited supra-additive interaction. The oral administration of DHA increased the pharmacokinetic parameter AUC0-t of naproxen (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the gastric damage induced by naproxen was abolished when this drug was combined with DHA. These data suggest that oral administration of DHA-naproxen combination induces gastric safety and supra-additive antinociceptive effect in the formalin test so that this combination could be useful to management of inflammatory pain. Drug Dev Res 78 : 332-339, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Synergistic Interaction of Matricaria Chamomilla Extract with Diclofenac and Indomethacin on Carrageenan-Induced Paw Inflammation in Rats.

Preclinical Research The coadministration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with medicinal plant extracts may increase anti-inflammatory activity, thus permitting the use of lower NSAID doses and limiting the side effects. The aim of this study was to explore the interactions between an ethanolic extract of M. chamomilla extract (MCE) with two NSAIDs, diclofenac and indomethacin on carrageenan-induced paw inflammation and gastric injury in rats. Diclofenac, indomethacin and MCE, or combinations with MCE produced an anti-inflammatory effect. Effective dose (ED) values were estimated for the individual drugs, and isobolograms were constructed. The final experimental ED values were 483.7 mg/kg for diclofenac + MCE combination, and 212.6 mg/kg for indomethacin + MCE. These values were lower (p < 0.05) than the theoretical ED values (1186.9 mg/kg for diclofenac + MCE combination, and 1183.8 mg/kg for indomethacin + MCE). These data suggest that the interactions between NSAIDs and MCE that mediate the anti-inflammatory effects at the systemic level are synergistic and may have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory processes. Drug Dev Res 78 : 360-367, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Are Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Affected by Nephrotic Stage?

BACKGROUND: Although tacrolimus therapy is not the first-line therapy for childhood nephrotic syndrome, it is often used instead of cyclosporine to ameliorate the side effects. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus (Tac) can be influenced by many conditions, and it has a high plasma protein binding. The Tac PK during relapse and remission of childhood nephrotic syndrome has not been well described. METHODS: We performed 14 PK profiles (with measurements before intake and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours postintake) in 7 children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome at week 1 (all nephrotic) and week 16 after Tac therapy (all in remission). These data were compared with historical PK data of 161 PK profiles in 87 pediatric renal transplant recipients with measurements before intake and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postintake. Tac levels were measured using the Abbott Tacro II assay. We used descriptive statistics to generate percentiles and compared these with those of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. RESULTS: The median age of patients with nephrotic syndrome was 3.2 years (range 2.5, 17.2), male gender 71.4%, significantly younger than the control group. Median Tac dose was similar during both PK profiles (0.11 mg·kg·d at week 1 versus 0.13 mg·kg·d at week 16, P = 0.81). There were no statistically significant differences in median dose-normalized area-under-the-time-concentration profiles, peak concentration, time to reach peak concentration, and Tac trough levels. Individual dose-normalized Tac levels for each time point during the PK profile were also not different (P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Tac PK profiles are unaltered during relapse of nephrotic syndrome.

Risk Factors for Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Solid Tumors Treated With Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CDDPBC) in pediatric patients. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the incidence and independent risk factors for FN in pediatric patients with solid tumors treated with CDPPBC. Cohort integration was performed in the first cycle of chemotherapy with CDDPBC and patients were followed up to 6 months after the last cycle. FN was defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Relative risks were calculated with confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI) to determine FN risk factors. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors. One hundred and thirty-nine pediatric patients (median age 7.4 y, range 0.08 to 17 y) were included in the study. FN incidence was 62.5%. Independent risk factors for FN were chemotherapy regimens including anthracyclines (odds ratio [OR]=19.44 [95% CI, 5.40-70.02), hypomagnesaemia (OR=8.20 [95% CI, 1.81-37.14]), and radiotherapy (OR=6.67 [95% CI, 1.24-35.94]). It is therefore concluded that anthracyclines-containing regimens, hypomagnesaemia, and radiotherapy are independent risk factors for FN in patients receiving CDDPBC.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican paediatric renal transplant patients: role of CYP3A5 genotype and formulation.

AIMS: The aims of this study were (i) to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tacrolimus in a Mexican renal transplant paediatric population (n = 53) and (ii) to test the influence of different covariates on its PK properties to facilitate dose individualization. METHODS: Population PK and variability parameters were estimated from whole blood drug concentration profiles obtained at steady-state using the non-linear mixed effect modelling software NONMEM® Version 7.2. RESULTS: Tacrolimus PK profiles exhibited high inter-patient variability (IPV). A two compartment model with first order input and elimination described the tacrolimus PK profiles in the studied population. The relationship between CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus CL/F was included in the final model. CL/F in CYP3A5*1/*1 and *1/*3 carriers was approximately 2- and 1.5-fold higher than in CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers (non-expressers), respectively, and explained almost the entire IPV in CL/F. Other covariates retained in the final model were the tacrolimus dose and formulation type. Limustin® showed markedly lower concentrations than the rest of the formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK modelling of tacrolimus in paediatric renal transplant recipients identified the tacrolimus formulation type as a significant covariate affecting the blood concentrations and confirmed the previously reported significant effect of CYP3A5 genotype on CL/F. It allowed the design of a proposed dosage based on the final model that is expected to help to improve tacrolimus dosing.