Pediatric retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction diagnosed by high-resolution impedance manometry.

OBJECTIVES: The inability to burp, known as retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (R-CPD), was initially described in adults. The proposed clinical diagnostic criteria for R-CPD include belching inability, abdominal bloating and discomfort/nausea, postprandial chest pain, and involuntary noises. Botulinum toxin injection to the cricopharyngeal muscle has been reported to be beneficial. High-resolution esophageal impedance-manometry (HRIM) features in adolescent patients with R-CPD have not been described yet.  The aim of our study was to describe the clinical and HRIM findings of pediatric patients with R-CPD. METHODS: Clinical and manometric features of five pediatric patients diagnosed with R-CPD were reviewed. HRIM study protocol was modified to include the consumption of carbonated drink to provoke symptoms and distinctive manometric features. RESULTS: We report five female patients aged 15-20 years who presented with an inability to burp and involuntary throat sounds. HRIM revealed normal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation during swallowing, but abnormal UES relaxation with concurrent high esophageal impedance reflecting air entrapment and secondary peristalsis following the carbonated drink challenge. Four patients exhibited esophageal motility disorder. All patients reported improvement or resolution of symptoms after botulinum toxin injection to the cricopharyngeus muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with an inability to burp, reflux-like symptoms, bloating, and involuntary throat noises should be assessed for R-CPD by pediatric gastroenterologists with HRIM. The relatively recent recognition of this novel condition is the likely reason for its under- and misdiagnosis in children.

Perioperative management protocol for pediatric endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe in esophageal motility disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Lower esophageal sphincter achalasia is associated with a higher risk of aspiration during anesthesia. Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is used as an adjunctive tool in both the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, for which all children require anesthesia. Anesthesia may affect the parameters of the EndoFLIP due to its effect on gut motility. There are no standard anesthesia protocols to help decrease the risk of aspiration and the undesirable effect of anesthesia on EndoFLIP parameters. This study aims to standardize an anesthesia protocol to target both goals. METHODS: A protocol was developed to address perioperative management in patients undergoing EndoFLIP for any indication to minimize both anesthetic effect on the esophageal motility as well as perioperative complications. A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients who underwent EndoFLIP at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; pre- and post-protocol implementation data including adverse events was compared. RESULTS: Pre-protocol implementation: 60 cases (median age of 13.8 years, 30 [50%] females) with 2 cases of adverse events (3.3%). Post-protocol implementation: 71 cases (median age of 14.6 years, 37 [52.1%] females) with no adverse events (0/71 = 0%). In comparison between pre- and post-protocol cases, no significant difference was noted in gender, age, and adverse events. Post-protocol procedures were found to be significantly shorter (median time of 89 vs. 79 min, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our anesthesia protocol provides a standardized way of administering anesthesia minimizing impact on EndoFLIP parameters and aspiration for patients with achalasia.

A multicenter registry study on percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation for pediatric disorders of gut-brain interaction.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) has demonstrated promise in single-center trials for pediatric abdominal pain-related disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Our aim was to explore efficacy of PENFS as standard therapy for DGBI in a registry involving multiple pediatric gastroenterology referral centers. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective open-label registry of children (8-18 years) undergoing PENFS for DGBI at seven tertiary care gastroenterology clinics. DGBI subtypes were classified by Rome IV criteria. Parents and patients completed Abdominal Pain Index (API), Nausea Severity Scale (NSS), and Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) questionnaires before, during therapy and at follow-up visits up to 1 year later. RESULTS: A total of 292 subjects were included. Majority (74%) were female with median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 16.3 (14.0, 17.7) years. Most (68%) met criteria for functional dyspepsia and 61% had failed ≥4 pharmacologic therapies. API, NSS, and FDI scores showed significant declines within 3 weeks of therapy, persisting long-term in a subset. Baseline (n = 288) median (IQR) child-reported API scores decreased from 2.68 (1.84, 3.58) to 1.99 (1.13, 3.27) at 3 weeks (p < 0.001) and 1.81 (0.85, 3.20) at 3 months (n = 75; p < 0.001). NSS scores similarly improved from baseline, persisting at three (n = 74; p < 0.001) and 6 months later (n = 55; p < 0.001). FDI scores displayed similar reductions at 3 months (n = 76; p = 0.01) but not beyond. Parent-reported scores were consistent with child reports. CONCLUSIONS: This large, comprehensive, multicenter registry highlights efficacy of PENFS for gastrointestinal symptoms and functionality for pediatric DGBI.

Ineffective esophageal motility: Characterization and outcomes across pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility centers in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) on high-resolution manometry (HRM) is not consistently associated with specific clinical syndromes or outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence, clinical features, management, and outcomes of pediatric IEM patients across the United States. METHODS: Clinical and manometric characteristics of children undergoing esophageal HRM during 2021-2022 were collected from 12 pediatric motility centers. Clinical presentation, test results, management strategies, and outcomes were compared between children with IEM and normal HRM. RESULTS: Of 236 children (median age 15 years, 63.6% female, 79.2% Caucasian), 62 (23.6%) patients had IEM, and 174 (73.7%) patients had normal HRM, with similar demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, and median symptom duration. Reflux monitoring was performed more often for IEM patients (25.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.002), but other adjunctive testing was similar. Among 101 patients with follow-up, symptomatic cohorts declined in both groups in relation to the initial presentation (p > 0.107 for each comparison) with management targeting symptoms, particularly acid suppression. Though prokinetics were used more often and behavioral therapy less often in IEM (p ≤ 0.015 for each comparison), symptom outcomes were similar between IEM and normal HRM. Despite a higher proportion with residual dysphagia on follow-up in IEM (64.0% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.043), an alternate mechanism for dysphagia was identified more often in IEM (68.8%) compared to normal HRM (27.8%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: IEM is a descriptive manometric pattern rather than a clinical diagnosis requiring specific intervention in children. Management based on clinical presentation provides consistent symptom outcomes.

Factors influencing gastrostomy tube feeding duration and nutrition outcomes in pediatric patients with Down syndrome: A descriptive cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Feeding difficulty is widely recognized in patients with Down syndrome, and many patients require gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for nutrition. No reliable factors have been identified to predict the expected duration of G-tube feeds in patients with Down syndrome. This descriptive cohort study aimed to determine the factors affecting the duration of G-tube feeds. We also investigated change in body mass index (BMI) from G-tube placement to discontinuation. METHODS: Medical records of patients with Down syndrome seen by a pediatric gastroenterologist at a tertiary care center between September 1986 and December 2021 were reviewed. Data collection included demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, and feeding route. Comparison was performed between patients who discontinued G-tube feeds and those who did not. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients (45% female) were included. The median age at G-tube placement was 5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.2-1.3 years). There were 113 (51%) patients who discontinued G-tube feeds, after a median duration of 31.6 months (IQR: 15.6-55.7 months). Tracheostomy was the only covariant associated with a longer duration of G-tube feeds (158 months vs 53 months; P = 0.002). Neither age at G-tube placement nor any comorbidities were associated with BMI status at discontinuation of G-tube. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with Down syndrome, age at placement of G-tube did not impact the duration of G-tube feeds. Most patients who had a G-tube placed were likely to require enteral feeds for at least 1 year. Those who had a tracheostomy needed their G-tube for a longer time.

Sacral nerve stimulation effect on colonic motility in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to treat refractory constipation in children. While its efficacy in improving symptoms has been studied, its effect on colonic motor function remains unclear. This case series explores SNS's impact on colonic motor function in pediatric patients with idiopathic constipation, using high-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM). METHODS: Four pediatric patients with chronic idiopathic constipation underwent SNS placement for intractable symptoms and were subsequently evaluated via HRCM. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, treatment regimens, and outcomes were reviewed. HRCM was conducted during the SNS-off and SNS-on phases. The motility index (MI) was measured during the SNS-off (fasting and postprandial) and SNS-on phases. RESULTS: Four pediatric patients aged 8 to 21 years met the inclusion criteria. In three patients, SNS-induced high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) were noted, and in one patient, low-amplitude propagating contractions (LAPCs) were noted. In one patient, propagating contractions were induced only when SNS was turned on. MI changes with SNS-on were variable among different patients with an increase in MI in two patients after turning SNS on and a decrease in the other two compared with baseline. Adverse effects following SNS placement remained minimal across all cases. CONCLUSION: This case series is the first to report SNS effects on colonic motility evaluated by HRCM in pediatrics. We demonstrate that propagating colonic contractions are promptly induced when SNS is turned on. Although the initial effects of SNS on colonic motility were observable, additional investigation is necessary to comprehend the fundamental mechanisms and long-term effectiveness of SNS in pediatric patients.

Interpretation of Impedance Data on High-resolution Impedance Manometry Studies-A Worldwide Survey.

Background/Aims: Esophageal manometry is the gold standard for esophageal motility evaluation. High-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HRIM) allows concurrent assessment of bolus transit and manometry. Inconsistencies between concomitant impedance and manometry data pose a clinical dilemma and has not yet been addressed. We aim to assess interpretation trends of HRIM data among gastroenterologists worldwide. Methods: A cross-sectional study using an anonymous survey was conducted among gastroenterologists worldwide. Statistical analysis was performed to compare responses between providers. Results: We received responses from 107 gastroenterologists (26 countries). Most were adult providers (69, 64.5%), and most (77, 72.0%) had > 5 years of experience. Impedance was found to be helpful by 83 (77.6%) participants, but over 30% reported inconsistencies between impedance and manometry data. With incomplete bolus clearance and normal manometry 41 (38.7%) recommended observation, 41 (38.7%) recommended 24-hours pH-impedance, and 16 (15.1%) recommended prokinetics. With abnormal manometry and complete bolus clearance, 60 (57.1%) recommended observation while 18 (17.1%) recommended 24-hours pH impedance and 15 (14.3%) recommended prokinetics. A significant difference was found between providers from different continents in treating cases with discrepancy between impedance and manometry findings (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in responses between adult versus pediatric providers and between providers with different years of experience. Conclusions: There is no consensus on interpreting HRIM data. Providers' approaches to studies with inconsistencies between manometry and impedance data vary. There is an unmet need for guidelines on interpreting impedance data in HRIM studies.

Diagnostic yield of left-sided colonic manometry in identifying colonic dysmotility in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Colonic manometry (CM) is a diagnostic procedure utilized in the evaluation of intractable constipation and involves endoscopic insertion of a manometry catheter with the tip placed in the cecum. Difficulty in advancing the colonic manometry catheter to the right colon and/or distal displacement of the catheter after appropriate placement can result in partial evaluation of the colon. Our study aimed to assess the value of limited left CM in identifying motility disorders. METHODS: We evaluated CM studies conducted at a tertiary pediatric center (2019-2022). Abnormal CM studies with catheter tips located in the cecum or ascending colon were included. KEY RESULTS: Of 161 CM studied, 68 with abnormal CM studies met inclusion criteria (29 [42.7%] females, median age 10.3 years). Pan-colonic dysmotility was noted in 29 (42.7%) studies and segmental dysmotility in 39 (57.4%) studies. Dysmotility of the descending and/or sigmoid colon was the most common segmental dysmotility (30, 76.9%). Isolated dysmotility of the ascending colon was noted only in patients with a cecostomy (6/13, 46.2%). The diagnostic sensitivity for dysmotility by left CM was 91.2%, which increased to 100% when excluding patients with cecostomy. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Left CM is a valuable and sensitive diagnostic tool for identifying abnormal colonic motility in most pediatric patients with constipation without cecostomy. Our study results provide reassurance when the manometry catheter becomes dislodged from the cecum and moves distally. Those with cecostomy have a high prevalence of dysmotility in the ascending colon and need a complete CM to identify it.

Manometric findings in children with eosinophilic esophagitis and persistent post-remission dysphagia.

Objectives: Dysphagia is a frequent symptom of active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but at times it persists despite attaining histologic healing and lack of fibro-stenotic changes. We aimed to describe the manometric findings in this subset of patients. Methods: A retrospective review of charts between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary pediatric gastroenterology center, treating roughly 1500 EoE patients per year. We included children with EoE referred to high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) for persistent dysphagia despite histologic healing (i.e., <15 eosinophils/high-power field [Eos/hpf]). Data including initial EoE diagnosis, endoscopy reports, esophageal biopsies, treatment regimens, and HRIM were retrospectively collected. Results: The estimated prevalence of post-remission dysphagia in our cohort was exceedingly rare (<0.05%). Four patients met the eligibility criteria of histologic remission and absence of fibro-stenotic features on endoscopic evaluation and thus, were included in this case series. Patients achieved remission with steroids, proton-pump inhibitor, or both within a median time of 5 months from diagnosis. Peak Eosinophil count at remission was ≤5 Eos/hpf in three patients and ≤10 Eos/hpf in one. On HRIM, all four patients had a hypomotile esophagus and abnormal bolus clearance. Lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure values were normal in three patients and elevated in one. Two patients were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility, one with aperistalsis and one with achalasia type 1. Conclusions: Post-remission dysphagia is rare in EoE. Esophageal dysmotility with a hypomotile pattern may contribute to the persistent dysphagia in children with EoE. HRIM should be considered in patients with EoE in whom symptoms persist despite histologic remission.

Exploring Diagnostic Priorities: The Role of Colonic Manometry in Evaluating Pediatric Patients with Intractable Idiopathic Constipation Prior to Sacral Nerve Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the limited understanding of its precise mechanism of action, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has proven to be helpful for pediatric patients with constipation, particularly those with fecal incontinence. It is unclear whether the outcome of SNS is impacted by normal or abnormal colonic motility. Our study aimed to determine whether colonic manometry results had an impact on the outcome of SNS as a treatment in pediatric patients with refractory idiopathic constipation. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients with idiopathic constipation who underwent colonic manometry and SNS placement at our center over 6 years were reviewed. A comparison of post-SNS outcomes was performed between patients with normal and abnormal colonic manometry studies. RESULTS: Twenty patients [12 (60%) females, median age of 10.2 years] met inclusion criteria, with fecal incontinence in 12 (60%) and abnormal colonic manometry in 6 (30%). Significantly more patients had an improvement in fecal incontinence following SNS placement (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in post-SNS constipation outcome measures between patients with normal versus abnormal colonic manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic manometry did not help with patient selection for those being considered for SNS therapy. Our findings do not support performing colonic manometry as a screening prior to SNS placement.