An analysis of long-term clinical outcome following the use of excimer laser coronary atherectomy in a large UK PCI center.

BACKGROUND: Excimer laser atherectomy (ELCA) is an established adjunctive technique to facilitate acute success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite this there are a lack of contemporary outcome data, particulary longer-term, forpatients treated with ELCA PCI. AIMS: To evaluate the contemporary use ofELCA in PCI, the frequency of periprocedural complications and the longer-term outcomes associated with ELCA PCI. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included all patients undergoing PCI (with or without ELCA) between April 2005 and May 2021. Relevant features from all cases were downloaded from the patient record and matched to hospital data on mortality on November 22, 2022. Kaplan Meier curves were used to compare mortality between the ELCA PCI and non-ELCA PCI cohorts with a landmark at 1 year. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess whether ELCA PCI was independently associated with long-term mortality. RESULT: There were 21,256 patients in this analysis, of which 448 (2.1%) were treated with ELCA PCI. ELCA PCI was associated with a higher frequency of any periprocedural complication. Median follow-up was 2812 days (IQR, 1577-4245 days) with higher mortality in ELCA PCI (38.2% vs. 29.0%, p < 0.001). However, on multivariable analysis, ELCA PCI was not independently associated with long-term mortality. The TVR frequency in ELCA PCI was 16.7% but TVR was significantly higher for cases of in-stent restenosis (ISR) (29.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite ELCA PCI being used in higher risk populations with complex coronary artery disease there was no long-term increased mortality associated with the use of this device. ELCA PCI for ISR is highly effective and safe although TVR in this cohort remains high in long-term follow-up.

Coronary artery calcium score and its association with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and incident stroke is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating CAC score and incident stroke. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed, and data were extracted from relevant studies. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the risk of incident stroke with any CAC vs. no CAC, 1-100 CAC vs. no CAC, and >100 CAC vs. no CAC. RESULTS: Data from nine different cohort studies from the United States and Europe with a total of 61,096 patients were included in this review. The mean age of patients in the studies ranged from 44 to 69 years, and follow-up duration ranged from a median of 5.5 years to 12.3 years. The crude stroke event varied from 1.6% to 9.5%. Meta-analysis of risk of incident stroke with any vs. no CAC (RR 1.70 95% CI 0.87-3.31, I2  = 95%) and for CAC 1-100 vs. no CAC (RR 1.54 95% CI 0.75-3.17, I2  = 93%) was not statistically significant. For CAC >100, the risk of incident stroke was significantly higher compared with no CAC (RR 2.61 95% CI 1.51-4.52, I2  = 89%). When one study which included only young adults was excluded, there was significant increase in risk of incident stroke with all categories of CAC. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between high CAC score and incident stroke, but more studies are needed to determine how patients with incidental CAC should be managed from the perspective of stroke prevention.

The impact of chronic total occlusions in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequently encountered in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to severe aortic stenosis. The prognostic relevance of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in this setting is poorly understood. We conducted a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies evaluating patients who underwent TAVR and evaluated outcomes depending on the presence of coronary CTOs. Pooled analysis was performed to estimate the rate and risk ratio for mortality. Four studies involving 25,432 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The follow up ranged from in-hospital outcomes to 8-years follow-up. Coronary artery disease was present in 67.8% to 75.5% of patients in 3 studies which reported this variable. The prevalence of CTOs varied between 2% and 12.6% in this cohort. The presence of CTOs was associated with increase in length of stay (8.1 ± 8.2 vs. 5.9 ± 6.5, p < 0.01), cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01), acute myocardial infarction (5.8% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.02) and acute kidney injury (18.6% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.048). The pooled 1-year death rate revealed 41 deaths in 165 patients in the CTO group and 396 deaths in 1663 patients with no CTO ((24.8%) vs. (23.8%)). The meta-analysis of death with CTO versus no CTO showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality with CTOs (risk ratio 1.11 95% CI 0.90-1.40, I2 = 0%). Our analysis suggests that concomitant CTO lesions in patients undergoing TAVR are common, and its presence was associated with increased in-hospital complications. However, CTO presence by itself was not associated with increased long-term mortality, only a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of death in patients with CTO was found. Further studies are warranted to assess the prognostic relevance of CTO lesion in TAVR patients.

Cerebral infarction and in-hospital mortality for patients admitted to hospital with intracardiac thrombus: insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

The factors associated with cerebral infarction and mortality in patients hospitalized with intracardiac thrombus are unknown. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of nationally representative hospital admissions in the National Inpatient Sample with a diagnosis of intracardiac thrombus between 2016 to 2019. Multiple logistic regressions were used to define factors associated with cerebral infarction and in-hospital mortality. There were a total of 175,370 admissions for patients with intracardiac thrombus and 10.1% patients had cerebral infarction (n = 17,675). Intracardiac thrombus represented 4.4% of primary diagnosis for admissions while circulatory conditions (65.4%), infection (5.9%), gastrointestinal conditions (4.4%), respiratory conditions (4.4%) and cancer (2.2%) were the other prevalent primary diagnoses. All-cause mortality was higher for patients with cerebral infarction (8.5% vs 4.8%). The five factors most associated with cerebral infarction were nephrotic syndrome (OR 2.67 95%CI 1.05-6.78), other thrombophilia (OR 2.12 95%CI 1.52-2.95), primary thrombophilia (OR 1.99 95%CI 1.52-2.53), previous stroke (OR 1.61 95%CI 1.47-1.75) and hypertension (OR 1.41 95%CI 1.27-1.56). The strongest independent predictors of death were heparin induced thrombocytopenia (OR 2.45 95%CI 150-4.00), acute venous thromboembolism (OR 2.03 95%CI 1.78-2.33, p < 0.001) acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.95 95%CI 1.72-2.22), arterial thrombosis (OR 1.75 95%CI 1.39-2.20) and cancer (OR 1.57 95%CI 1.36-1.81). Patients with intracardiac thrombus are at risk of cerebral infarction and in-hospital mortality. Nephrotic syndrome, thrombophilia, previous stroke, hypertension, and heparin induced thrombocytopenia were associated with cerebral infarction, while acute venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, and cancer were predictors of mortality.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a major cause of mortality in patients with renal failure. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the rates, predictors, and outcomes of GIB in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed, and data were extracted from relevant studies. Statistical pooling was performed to determine the rate of GIB in patients with CKD, and a random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the predictors of GIB and mortality in patients with GIB. Twenty-two studies were included in this review, with 7,810,273 patients with CKD included in the analysis. The pooled results of five studies suggested that the rate of GIB in patients with CKD was 2.2%, and among the studies in which patients with CKD underwent endoscopy, the pooled results for GIB were 35.8%. Receipt of dialysis (OR 14.48, 95%CI 4.96-42.32), older age (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.05), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.22-1.39), history of ulcers (OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.03-2.26), and cirrhosis (OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.41-2.12) were significantly associated with GIB. The pooled results suggest a twofold increase in the odds of mortality with GIB, with significant heterogeneity (OR 2.12, 95%CI 1.45-3.10, I2 = 93%). GIB in patients with CKD affects 2% of patients but can be greater in the group of patients who underwent endoscopy. Receipt of dialysis is a strong predictor of GIB, and sustained GIB is associated with a twofold increase in the odds of mortality compared to patients without GIB.

Key pointsThe rate of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) was 2.2%.The rate of GIB in patients with CKD is higher in those who undergo endoscopy.Dialysis, older age, diabetes mellitus, history of ulcers, and cirrhosis were significantly associated with GIB in CKD.GIB in patients with CKD was associated with a twofold increase in the odds of mortality.

Acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to hospitals that perform percutaneous coronary interventions in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We explored the potential of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke patients at hospitals that perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed nationally representative data between 2017 and 2020 to determine the numbers, characteristics, and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to hospitals that perform both primary PCI and MT, hospitals that perform primary PCI but not MT and hospitals that perform neither PCI or MT. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the effect of hospital type on in-hospital mortality and discharge home (without palliative care). RESULTS: A total of 1,210,415, 1,002,950, and 488,845 acute ischemic stroke patients were admitted to hospitals that performed both primary PCI and MT, performed primary PCI but not MT, or performed neither PCI nor MT, respectively. Compared with hospitals that performed both PCI and MT, the odds of in-hospital mortality were lower in hospitals that performed PCI only (odds ratio (OR) 0.88 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.91, p<0.001) and hospitals that performed neither PCI or MT (OR 0.85 95 %CI 0.82-0.89, p<0.0010). There was no significant difference in the odds of discharge home between the three types of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 37 % the patients with acute ischemic stroke are admitted to hospitals that perform primary PCI (but not MT) supporting strategies to increase the performance of MT in such hospitals as an option to increase rapid availability of MT in the United States.

Intra-arterial thrombolysis as adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients in the United States: A case control analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although observational studies have reported favorable clinical outcomes associated with intra-arterial thrombolysis as adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy, the cost and length of hospitalization associated with this intervention has not been studied. METHODS: We analyzed the nationally representative data of the United States data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to compare hospitalization cost and duration in addition to other outcomes in patients receiving (n = 1990) with those not receiving intra-arterial thrombolysis (n = 1990) in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy using a case control design matched for age, gender, and presence of aphasia, hemiplegia, neglect, coma/stupor, hemianopsia and dysphagia. RESULTS: There was no difference in the median hospitalization cost in patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis compared with those not treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: $36,992 [28,361 to 54,336] versus $35,440 [24,383 to 50,438], (regression coefficient 2,485 [-1,947 to 6,917], p = 0.27). There was no difference in the median length of hospitalization in patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis compared with those not treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: 6 days [3 to 10] versus 6 days [4 to 10], (regression coefficient -0.34 [-1.47 to 0.80], p = 0.56). There was no difference in odds of home-discharge (OR 1.02 95%CI 0.72-1.43, p = 0.93) or post-procedural intracranial hemorrhage (OR 1.16 95%CI 0.83-1.64, p = 0.39) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in the cost or length of hospitalization associated with the use of intra-arterial thrombolysis as adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. If the ongoing randomized clinical trials demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in reducing death or disability, this intervention has a high likelihood of being beneficial overall.

Impact of Pleural Effusion on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism (PE) and associated pleural effusion, and the impact of these effusions on outcomes on a national level is unknown. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 to 2019 was used to conduct a retrospective nationwide cohort study of hospital admissions for PE with and without pleural effusion. Multiple logistic regressions and linear regression analyses were used to determine the independent impact of effusions on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost. RESULTS: There were 937,744 hospital admissions with PE included in our analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 50-76] years; 52.5% females). The in-hospital mortality rate overall was 3.7% which was 5.5% for patients with pleural effusion and 3.6% for patients without pleural effusion (p<0.001). The median length of stay was longer in the group with pleural effusion (6 [3-12] days vs 4 [2-6] days, p<0.001) and the median healthcare cost was higher among patients with pleural effusion (13,689 [7,279-30,915] vs 8,855 [5,472-16,531], p<0.001). The factors most associated with pleural effusion were atrial fibrillation (OR 1.89 95%CI 1.78-2.00, p<0.001) and arterial thrombosis (OR 1.48 95%CI 1.19-1.84, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased odds of mortality in patients with PE (OR 1.30 95%CI 1.18-1.45, p<0.001). Pleural effusion was associated with increased length of stay (Coefficient 4.15 95%CI 3.99 to 4.32, p<0.001), and healthcare costs (Coefficient 12,164; 95%CI:11,639 to 12,688, p<0.001)). CONCLUSION: Concomitant pleural effusion is not uncommon among PE patients which is more common in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous arterial thrombosis. Pleural effusions in patients with PE are associated with higher in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost.

The impact of COVID-19 on the patient, clinician, healthcare services and society: A patient pathway review.

The spread of COVID-19 infection has changed the world. Population-based studies of COVID-19 are limited because it is unknown why events happen or why certain outcomes occur. An alternative approach called the patient pathway review evaluates what happens to individuals in detail. In the "ideal" pathway patients with COVID-19 will seek medical attention and COVID-19 will be identified and they will either be admitted to hospital, managed in the community or they will self-care. However, in the "real-world" pathway, patients may delay seeking medical attention and it is variable who the patient decides to seek help from and some patients may be initially misdiagnosed. The eventual outcome will be recovery from the acute infection or death but there may be a spectrum of healthcare needs for patients from those who care for themselves in the community to those who are hospitalized and require intensive care. The patients may or may not have short- and long-term adverse effects. People infected with COVID-19 can take on different paths which depend on the patient's decision making, clinical decision making, and the patient's response to the infection. Desirable pathways are those where patients have good outcomes and also limit the transmission of the virus.

Remote monitoring data from cardiac implantable electronic devices predicts all-cause mortality.

AIMS: To determine if remotely monitored physiological data from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can be used to identify patients at high risk of mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study evaluated whether a risk score based on CIED physiological data (Triage-Heart Failure Risk Status, 'Triage-HFRS', previously validated to predict heart failure (HF) events) can identify patients at high risk of death. Four hundred and thirty-nine adults with CIEDs were prospectively enrolled. Primary observed outcome was all-cause mortality (median follow-up: 702 days). Several physiological parameters [including heart rate profile, atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT) burden, ventricular rate during AT/AF, physical activity, thoracic impedance, therapies for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation] were continuously monitored by CIEDs and dynamically combined to produce a Triage-HFRS every 24 h. According to transmissions patients were categorized into 'high-risk' or 'never high-risk' groups. During follow-up, 285 patients (65%) had a high-risk episode and 60 patients (14%) died (50 in high-risk group; 10 in never high-risk group). Significantly more cardiovascular deaths were observed in the high-risk group, with mortality rates across groups of high vs. never-high 10.3% vs. <4.0%; P = 0.03. Experiencing any high-risk episode was associated with a substantially increased risk of death [odds ratio (OR): 3.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-6.58, P = 0.002]. Furthermore, each high-risk episode ≥14 consecutive days was associated with increased odds of death (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.06-1.48; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring data from CIEDs can be used to identify patients at higher risk of all-cause mortality as well as HF events. Distinct from other prognostic scores, this approach is automated and continuously updated.

Prevalence of orthostatic hypertension and its association with cerebrovascular diagnoses in patients with suspected TIA and minor stroke.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the rate of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular disease diagnoses across groups of patients based on their orthostatic blood pressure response in a transients ischemic attack clinic setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 3201 patients referred to a transient ischemic attack (TIA)/minor stroke outpatients clinic. Trained nurses measured supine and standing blood pressure using an automated blood pressure device and the patients were categorized based on their orthostatic blood pressure change into four groups: no orthostatic blood pressure rise, systolic orthostatic hypertension, diastolic orthostatic hypertension, and combined orthostatic hypertension. Then, four stroke physicians, who were unaware of patients' orthostatic BP response, assessed the patients and made diagnoses based on clinical and imaging data. We compared the rate of stroke, TIA, and cerebrovascular disease (either stroke or TIA) diagnoses across the study groups using Pearson's χ2 test. The effect of confounders was adjusted using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Cerebrovascular disease was significantly less common in patients with combined systolic and diastolic orthostatic hypertension compared to the "no rise" group [OR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.35-0.89]. The odds were even lower among the subgroups of patients with obesity [OR = 0.31 (0.12-0.80)], without history of smoking [OR 0.34 (0.15-0.80)], and without hypertension [OR = 0.42 (95% CI 0.19-0.92)]. We found no significant relationship between orthostatic blood pressure rise with the diagnosis of stroke. However, the odds of TIA were significantly lower in patients with diastolic [OR 0.82 (0.68-0.98)] and combined types of orthostatic hypertension [OR = 0.54 (0.32-0.93)]; especially in patients younger than 65 years [OR = 0.17 (0.04-0.73)] without a history of hypertension [OR = 0.34 (0.13-0.91)], and patients who did not take antihypertensive therapy [OR = 0.35 (0.14-0.86)]. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that orthostatic hypertension may be a protective factor for TIA among younger and normotensive patients.

Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection is a rare but potentially catastrophic condition. Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection is not uncommon as symptoms can overlap with other diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to better understand the factors contributing to incorrect diagnosis of this condition. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies that evaluated the misdiagnosis of aortic dissection. The rate of misdiagnosis was pooled and results were narratively synthesized. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with were included with 1663 patients. The overall rate of misdiagnosis of aortic dissection was 33.8%. The proportion of patients presenting with chest pain, back pain and syncope were 67.5%, 24.8% and 6.8% respectively. The proportion of patients with pre-existing hypertension was 55.4%, 30.5% were smokers while the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery or surgical trauma and Marfan syndrome was 14.7%, 5.8%, and 3.7%, respectively. Factors related to misdiagnosis included the presence of symptoms and features associated with other diseases (such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke and pulmonary embolism), the absence of typical features (such as widened mediastinum on chest X-ray) or concurrent conditions such congestive heart failure. Factors associated with more accurate diagnosis included more comprehensive history taking and increased use of imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis in patients with an eventual diagnosis of aortic dissection affects 1 in 3 patients. Clinicians should consider aortic dissection as differential diagnosis in patients with chest pain, back pain and syncope. Imaging should be used early to make the diagnosis when aortic dissection is suspected.

Definition, prevalence, and clinical significance of mitral annular disjunction in different patient cohorts: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality involving a distinct separation of the left atrium/mitral valve annulus and myocardium continuum. The literature around MAD has increased over recent years, thus we sought to review the current data on the definition, prevalence, and clinical outcomes of MAD. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies which evaluated MAD in any patient cohort. The study results were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included with 3925 patients (average age 62 years, 63% male). The pooled prevalence of MAD in patients with mitral valve prolapse and/or Barlow's disease was 30.1%. In a general population, MAD prevalence was 8.7%. The definition of MAD was not consistent across all studies. In terms of clinical outcomes, only one study reported MAD to be associated with ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: MAD is an increasingly recognized finding amongst patients undergoing cardiac imaging. This review highlights the need for agreed definitions for clinically significant MAD and how identified MAD should be managed. At present, there is insufficient evidence that MAD is associated adverse clinical outcomes.

Missed Opportunities in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure: Evaluation of Pathways to Determine Sources of Delay to Specialist Evaluation.

Missed opportunities are incidents where different actions by those involved could have resulted in more desirable events. Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome presenting as symptoms and signs common to other diagnoses, in patients frequently with multiple co-morbidities. Heart failure itself is not a diagnosis, but is the common clinical presentation of a variety of cardiac conditions. Correct diagnosis involves amalgamation of the clinical presentation, the results of general and specific investigations, and the clinician's ability to synthesize the overall picture. It is not surprising therefore that misdiagnosis can occur at any level of the heart failure journey and can occur because of patient, clinician, and health economy related factors. Delayed diagnosis leads to excess morbidity and mortality in these patients. In this review, we define the pathways for diagnosis of heart failure and then highlight missed opportunities related to delay and misdiagnosis. In addition, we consider how the earlier opportunity may impact patients, clinicians and health services.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer and readmissions within 90 days for acute myocardial infarction and bleeding in the USA.

AIMS: The post-discharge outcomes of patients with cancer who undergo PCI are not well understood. This study evaluates the rates of readmissions within 90 days for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and bleeding among patients with cancer who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated with PCI in the years from 2010 to 2014 in the US Nationwide Readmission Database were evaluated for the influence of cancer on 90-day readmissions for AMI and bleeding. A total of 1 933 324 patients were included in the analysis (2.7% active cancer, 6.8% previous history of cancer). The 90-day readmission for AMI after PCI was higher in patients with active cancer (12.1% in lung, 10.8% in colon, 7.5% in breast, 7.0% in prostate, and 9.1% for all cancers) compared to 5.6% among patients with no cancer. The 90-day readmission for bleeding after PCI was higher in patients with active cancer (4.2% in colon, 1.5% in lung, 1.4% in prostate, 0.6% in breast, and 1.6% in all cancer) compared to 0.6% among patients with no cancer. The average time to AMI readmission ranged from 26.7 days for lung cancer to 30.5 days in colon cancer, while the average time to bleeding readmission had a higher range from 38.2 days in colon cancer to 42.7 days in breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Following PCI, patients with cancer have increased risk for readmissions for AMI or bleeding, with the magnitude of risk depending on both cancer type and the presence of metastasis.

A comparison of clinical outcomes following atrial fibrillation ablation for heart failure patients with preserved or reduced left ventricular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This review aims to determine if patients who undergo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) do better, or worse or the same compared to patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using the search terms: "atrial fibrillation", "ablation" and terms related to HFpEF and HFrEF in order to identify studies that evaluated one or more of i) AF recurrence, ii) periprocedural complications and iii) adverse outcomes at follow up for patients with HFpEF and HFrEF who underwent AF ablation. Data was extracted from included studies and statistically pooled to evaluate adverse events and AF recurrence. RESULTS: 5 studies were included in this review and the sample size of the studies ranged from 91 to 521 patients with heart failure. There was no significant difference in the pooled rate for no AF or symptom recurrence after AF ablation comparing patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF (RR 1.07 95%CI 0.86-1.33, p = 0.15). The most common complications were access site complications/haematoma/bleeding which occurred in similar proportion in each group; HFpEF (3.1%) and HFrEF (3.1%). In terms of repeat ablations, two studies were pooled to yield a rate of 78/455 (17.1%) for HFpEF vs 24/279 (8.6%) for HFrEF (p = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction have similar risk of AF or symptom recurrence after AF ablation but two studies suggest that patients with HFpEF are more likely to have repeat ablations.

Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers have been designed as an alternative to transvenous systems which avoid some of the complications associated with transvenous devices. We aim to perform a systematic review of the literature to report the safety and efficacy findings of leadless pacemakers. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies reporting the safety, efficacy and outcomes of patients implanted with a leadless pacemaker. The pooled rate of adverse events was determined and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of adverse outcomes for leadless compared to transvenous pacemakers. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included with 2496 patients implanted with a leadless pacemaker and success rates range between 95.5 and 100%. The device or procedure related death rate was 0.3% while any complication and pericardial tamponade occurred in 3.1% and 1.4% of patients, respectively. Other complications such as pericardial effusion, device dislodgement, device revision, device malfunction, access site complications and infection occurred in less than 1% of patients. Meta-analysis of four studies suggests that there was no difference in hematoma (RR 0.67 95%CI 0.21-2.18, 3 studies), pericardial effusion (RR 0.59 95%CI 0.15-2.25, 3 studies), device dislocation (RR 0.33 95%CI 0.06-1.74, 3 studies), any complication (RR 0.44 95%CI 0.17-1.09, 4 studies) and death (RR 0.45 95%CI 0.15-1.35, 2 studies) comparing patients who received leadless and transvenous pacemakers. CONCLUSION: Leadless pacemakers are safe and effective for patients who have an indication for single chamber ventricular pacing and the findings appear to be comparable to transvenous pacemakers.

Distribution of High-Sensitivity Troponin Taken Without Conventional Clinical Indications in Critical Care Patients and Its Association With Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the distribution of high-sensitivity troponin in a consecutive cohort of patients in critical care units, regardless of clinical indication, and its association with clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Single-center teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to two adult critical care units (general critical care unit and neuroscience critical care unit) over a 6-month period. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had high-sensitivity troponin tests performed at admission and tracked throughout their critical care stay, regardless of whether the supervising team felt there was a clinical indication. The results were not revealed to patients or clinicians unless clinically requested. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 1,033 patients in the study cohort (general critical care unit 750 and neuroscience critical care unit 283). The median high-sensitivity troponin was 21 ng/L (interquartile range, 7-86 ng/L), with 560 patients (54.2%) above the upper limit of normal as defined by the manufacturer. Admission high-sensitivity troponin concentrations above the upper limit of normal in general critical care unit and neuroscience critical care unit were associated with increasing age, comorbidity, markers of illness severity, and the need for organ support. On adjusted analysis, the high-sensitivity troponin concentration remained an independent predictor of critical care mortality in general critical care unit and neuroscience critical care unit. CONCLUSIONS: High-sensitivity troponin elevation, taken outside the context of conventional clinical indications, was common in the critically ill. Such elevations were associated with increasing age, comorbidity, illness severity, and the need for organ support. Admission high-sensitivity troponin concentration is an independent predictor of critical care mortality and as such may represent a novel prognostic biomarker at admission.

Misdiagnosis of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease associated with a significant burden to patients, families, and health services. The diagnosis of HF can be easily missed owing to similar symptoms with other conditions especially respiratory diseases. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review to determine the rates of HF and cardiomyopathy misdiagnosis and explored the potential causes. The included studies were narratively synthesized. Ten studies were identified including a total of 223,859 patients. There was a lack of definition of HF misdiagnosis in the studies and inconsistent diagnostic criteria were used. The rates of HF misdiagnosis ranged from 16.1% in hospital setting to 68.5% when general practitioner referred patients to specialist setting. The most common cause for misdiagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). One study using a COPD cohort showed that HF was unrecognized in 20.5% of patients and 8.1% had misdiagnosis of HF as COPD. Another study suggests that anemia and chronic kidney disease are associated with an increase in the odds of unrecognized left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Other comorbidities such as obesity, old age, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic heart disease are prevalent in patients with a misdiagnosis of HF. CONCLUSIONS: The misdiagnosis of HF is an unfortunate part of everyday clinical practice that occurs with a variable rate depending on the population studied. HF is frequently misdiagnosed as COPD. More research is needed to better understand the missed opportunities to correctly diagnose HF so that harm to patients can be avoided and effective treatments can be implemented.

Cost of coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and 30-day unplanned readmission in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the cost of coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 30-day unplanned readmissions. BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of the hospital cost of index PCI and 30-day unplanned readmissions. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI between 2010 and 2014 in the U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database were included. The primary outcome was total cost defined by cost of index PCI and first unplanned readmission within 30 days. RESULTS: This analysis included 2,294,244 patients who underwent PCI, and the mean cost was $23,541 ± $20,730 (~$10.8 billion/year). There was a modest increase in cost over the study years of 17.5%. Of the 9.4% with an unplanned readmission within 30 days, the mean total cost was $35,333 ± 24,230 versus $22,323 ± 19,941 for those not readmitted. The variables most strongly associated with the highest quartile of cost were heart failure (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 25.60 [95% CI 21.59-30.35]), need for circulatory support (aOR 11.62 [10.13-13.32]), periprocedural coronary artery bypass graft (CABG, aOR 585.08 [357.85-956.58]), and readmission within 30 days (aOR 24.49 [22.40-26.77]). An acute kidney injury (AKI; 8.5%), major bleed (0.8%), vascular injury (0.8%), or need for periprodedural CABG (1.4%) had an average increased cost of $21,935; $30,898; $27,875; and $43,005, respectively, compared to PCI without adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The annual 30-day hospital cost of PCI is approximately $10.8 billion, and the costs associated with in-hospital adverse events, particularly the need for AKI and periprocedural CABG, were significant.