Markers associated with genomic instability, immunogenicity and immune therapy responsiveness in Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Expression of γH2AX, pRPA2, P53, PD-L1 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in 76 cases.

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast carcinoma that is often resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Immune check point inhibitors have shown activity in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) - positive metastatic triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC), which raises the possibility that immunotherapy may also be effective in MpBC as most of the MpBCs are triple negative. The aim of the present study was to assess genomic instability and immunogenicity in tumor specimens of patients with MpBC. METHODS: A total of 76 patients diagnosed with MpBC over a 15-year period were included in the study. We performed immunohistochemical analyses for tumor cell PD-L1, immune cell PD-L1 and p53 on tissue microarrays (TMAs), analyzed stromal and intratumoral tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides and scored gamma-H2AX (γH2AX) and phosphorylated-RPA2 (pRPA2) from whole tissue sections. We correlated marker expression with clinicopathologic features and clinical outcome. RESULTS: All tumors expressed γH2AX and pRPA2 with median expressions of 43% and 44%. P53- (68%), tumor cell PD-L1- (59%) and immune cell PD-L1-positivity (62%) were common in MpBCs. Median stromal TIL and intratumoral TIL counts were 5% and 0. The spindle and squamous cell carcinomas expressed the highest levels of PD-L1 and TILs, and carcinoma with mesenchymal differentiation the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: MpBC appears to be an immunogenic cancer with high genomic instability and frequent PD-L1-positivity, implying that check point inhibitors might be effective in MpBC. Expression levels of PD-L1 and TILs varied across different histologic subtypes, suggesting that immunotherapy might be less effective in carcinoma with mesenchymal differentiation.

Gene-panel testing of breast and ovarian cancer patients identifies a recurrent RAD51C duplication.

Gene-panel sequencing allows comprehensive analysis of multiple genes simultaneously and is now routinely used in clinical mutation testing of high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients. However, only BRCA1 and BRCA2 are often analyzed also for large genomic changes. Here, we have analyzed 10 clinically relevant susceptibility genes in 95 breast or ovarian cancer patients with gene-panel sequencing including also copy number variants (CNV) analysis for genomic changes. We identified 12 different pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, CHEK2, or RAD51C mutations in 18 of 95 patients (19%). BRCA1/2 mutations were observed in 8 patients (8.4%) and CHEK2 protein-truncating mutations in 7 patients (7.4%). In addition, we identified a novel duplication encompassing most of the RAD51C gene. We further genotyped the duplication in breast or ovarian cancer families (n = 1149), in unselected breast (n = 1729) and ovarian cancer cohorts (n = 553), and in population controls (n = 1273). Seven additional duplication carries were observed among cases but none among controls. The duplication associated with ovarian cancer risk (3/590 of all ovarian cancer patients, 0.5%, P = .032 compared with controls) and was found to represent a large fraction of all identified RAD51C mutations in the Finnish population. Our data emphasizes the importance of comprehensive mutation analysis including CNV detection in all the relevant genes.

Overabundant FANCD2, alone and combined with NQO1, is a sensitive marker of adverse prognosis in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Defective DNA repair is central to the progression and treatment of breast cancer. Immunohistochemically detected DNA repair markers may be good candidates for novel prognostic and predictive factors that could guide the selection of individualized treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have analyzed nuclear immunohistochemical staining of BRCA1, FANCD2, RAD51, XPF, and PAR in relation to clinicopathological and survival data among 1240 paraffin-embedded breast tumors, and additional gene expression microarray data from 76 tumors. The antioxidant enzyme NQO1 was analyzed as a potential modifier of prognostic DNA repair markers. RESULTS: RAD51 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.94, P = 0.0050] and FANCD2 expression (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.28-1.76, P = 1.50 × 10(-7)) were associated with breast cancer survival. High FANCD2 expression correlated with markers of adverse prognosis but remained independently prognostic in multivariate analysis (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.49, P = 0.0043). The FANCD2-associated survival effect was most pronounced in hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative tumors, and in tumors with above-median NQO1 expression. In the NQO1-high subset, patients belonging to the highest quartile of FANCD2 immunohistochemical scores had a threefold increased risk of metastasis or death (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.96-4.92). Global gene expression analysis indicated that FANCD protein overabundance is associated with the upregulation of proliferation-related genes and a downregulated nucleotide excision repair pathway. CONCLUSION: FANCD2 immunohistochemistry is a sensitive, independent prognostic factor in breast cancer, particularly when standard markers indicate relatively favorable prognosis. Taken together, our results suggest that the prognostic effect is linked to proliferation, DNA damage, and oxidative stress; simultaneous detection of FANCD2 and NQO1 provides additional prognostic value.

Somatic MED12 mutations in uterine leiomyosarcoma and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mediator complex participates in transcriptional regulation by connecting regulatory DNA sequences to the RNA polymerase II initiation complex. Recently, we discovered through exome sequencing that as many as 70% of uterine leiomyomas harbour specific mutations in exon 2 of mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12). In this work, we examined the role of MED12 exon 2 mutations in other tumour types. METHODS: The frequency of MED12 exon 2 mutations was analysed in altogether 1158 tumours by direct sequencing. The tumour spectrum included mesenchymal tumours (extrauterine leiomyomas, endometrial polyps, lipomas, uterine leiomyosarcomas, other sarcomas, gastro-intestinal stromal tumours), hormone-dependent tumours (breast and ovarian cancers), haematological malignancies (acute myeloid leukaemias, acute lymphoid leukaemias, myeloproliferative neoplasms), and tumours associated with abnormal Wnt-signalling (colorectal cancers (CRC)). RESULTS: Five somatic alterations were observed: three in uterine leiomyosarcomas (3/41, 7%; Gly44Ser, Ala38_Leu39ins7, Glu35_Leu36delinsVal), and two in CRC (2/392, 0.5%; Gly44Cys, Ala67Val). CONCLUSION: Somatic MED12 exon 2 mutations were observed in uterine leiomyosarcomas, suggesting that a subgroup of these malignant tumours may develop from a leiomyoma precursor. Mutations in CRC samples indicate that MED12 may, albeit rarely, contribute to CRC tumorigenesis.

PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2.

BACKGROUND: Predict (www.predict.nhs.uk) is an online, breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit tool. The aim of this study was to incorporate the prognostic effect of HER2 status in a new version (Predict+), and to compare its performance with the original Predict and Adjuvant!. METHODS: The prognostic effect of HER2 status was based on an analysis of data from 10 179 breast cancer patients from 14 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The hazard ratio estimates were incorporated into Predict. The validation study was based on 1653 patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer identified from the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit. Predicted overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) for Predict+, Predict and Adjuvant! were compared with observed outcomes. RESULTS: All three models performed well for both OS and BCSS. Both Predict models provided better BCSS estimates than Adjuvant!. In the subset of patients with HER2-positive tumours, Predict+ performed substantially better than the other two models for both OS and BCSS. CONCLUSION: Predict+ is the first clinical breast cancer prognostication tool that includes tumour HER2 status. Use of the model might lead to more accurate absolute treatment benefit predictions for individual patients.

Evaluation of the XRCC1 gene as a phenotypic modifier in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Results from the consortium of investigators of modifiers of BRCA1/BRCA2.

BACKGROUND: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in DNA repair are good candidates to be tested as phenotypic modifiers for carriers of mutations in the high-risk susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. The base excision repair (BER) pathway could be particularly interesting given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the pathway, PARP1, and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In this study, we have evaluated the XRCC1 gene that participates in the BER pathway, as phenotypic modifier of BRCA1 and BRCA2. METHODS: Three common SNPs in the gene, c.-77C>T (rs3213245) p.Arg280His (rs25489) and p.Gln399Arg (rs25487) were analysed in a series of 701 BRCA1 and 576 BRCA2 mutation carriers. RESULTS: An association was observed between p.Arg280His-rs25489 and breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers, with rare homozygotes at increased risk relative to common homozygotes (hazard ratio: 22.3, 95% confidence interval: 14.3-34, P<0.001). This association was further tested in a second series of 4480 BRCA1 and 3016 BRCA2 mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2. CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATION: No evidence of association was found when the larger series was analysed which lead us to conclude that none of the three SNPs are significant modifiers of breast cancer risk for mutation carriers.

High cyclin B1 expression is associated with poor survival in breast cancer.

Cyclin B1 regulates the G(2)-M transition of the cell cycle. Cyclin B1 expression is higher in premalignant and malignant than normal breast lesions. Correlation of cyclin B1 expression with other histopathological variables and prognostic role in breast cancer are not fully understood. Traditionally used prognostic criteria identify large subset of patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and to be exposed to adverse effects. A reliable and simple method helping prognostic evaluation in breast cancer is needed. We analysed cyclin B1 expression on 1348 invasive breast cancers and studied correlations with other histopathological variables and survival. High cyclin B1 correlated with high tumour grade, large tumour size and positive nodal status, oestrogen and progesterone receptor negativity, positive HER2 and p53 status, young age at diagnosis, and high cyclin E, cyclin A and Ki67 expression. Among patients not given adjuvant chemotherapy high cyclin B1 was a strong predictor of shorter overall and metastasis-free survival (RR 3.74, P<0.0005 and RR 3.51, P<0.0005, respectively), and remained as an independent prognostic factor also in multivariate analysis (RR 1.80, P=0.04 and RR 2.31, P=0.02, respectively). This study suggests high cyclin B1 associates with aggressive phenotype and is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer.

The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions.

Multiple genetic loci confer susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. We have previously developed a model (BOADICEA) under which susceptibility to breast cancer is explained by mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as by the joint multiplicative effects of many genes (polygenic component). We have now updated BOADICEA using additional family data from two UK population-based studies of breast cancer and family data from BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers identified by 22 population-based studies of breast or ovarian cancer. The combined data set includes 2785 families (301 BRCA1 positive and 236 BRCA2 positive). Incidences were smoothed using locally weighted regression techniques to avoid large variations between adjacent intervals. A birth cohort effect on the cancer risks was implemented, whereby each individual was assumed to develop cancer according to calendar period-specific incidences. The fitted model predicts that the average breast cancer risks in carriers increase in more recent birth cohorts. For example, the average cumulative breast cancer risk to age 70 years among BRCA1 carriers is 50% for women born in 1920-1929 and 58% among women born after 1950. The model was further extended to take into account the risks of male breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer, and to allow for the risk of multiple cancers. BOADICEA can be used to predict carrier probabilities and cancer risks to individuals with any family history, and has been implemented in a user-friendly Web-based program (http://www.srl.cam.ac.uk/genepi/boadicea/boadicea_home.html).

The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility.

Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2, Chk2) emerges as an important signal transducer of cellular responses to DNA damage and a candidate tumor suppressor whose defects contribute to molecular pathogenesis of diverse types of human malignancies, both sporadic and hereditary. Here, we briefly outline the molecular properties, regulation and physiological role of CHEK2, and review in more detail its defects that predispose to tumors, with particular emphasis on familial breast cancer. The frequency, penetrance and epidemiological as well as clinical significance of the two most studied breast cancer-predisposing variants of the CHEK2 gene, 1100delC and I157T, are highlighted in more depth, and additional CHEK2 mutations and their cancer relevance are discussed as well. These recent findings are considered also from a broader perspective of CHEK2 as the integral component of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated-CHEK2-p53 pathway within the genome integrity maintenance system and a barrier against tumor progression. Finally, the potential value of information about the CHEK2 status in family counseling and optimizition of individualized cancer treatment is discussed.

CHEK2 I157T associates with familial and sporadic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a functionally defective CHEK2 variant I157T has been proposed to associate with an increased risk of several types of cancer. We investigated the CHEK2 I157T variant for colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition in a large population based study including a significant number of familial CRC cases. METHODS: We screened the CHEK2 I157T variant in a population based series of 1042 Finnish CRC patients using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Mutation status was studied for correlation with clinical characteristics and family history of CRC and other cancers. RESULTS: The frequency of CHEK2 I157T was significantly higher in CRC patients (7.8%, 76/972) than in healthy population controls (5.3%, 100/1885) (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.008). The significant association of CHEK2 I157T with CRC was observed among patients with (10.4%, 14/135) and without (7.4%, 62/837) a family history of CRC (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7, p = 0.01; OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0, p = 0.03; respectively). A trend towards higher variant frequency was also noted among patients with multiple primary tumours and a family history of any cancer. CONCLUSIONS: CHEK2 I157T associates with an increased risk of CRC: the association was observed both among familial and sporadic CRC patients. Furthermore, the higher frequency of I157T among patients with multiple primary tumours as well as those with a family history of any cancer supports a role for CHEK2 I157T as a susceptibility allele for multiple cancer types.

No MSH6 germline mutations in breast cancer families with colorectal and/or endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: The genetic background in breast cancer families with colorectal and/or endometrial cancer is mostly unknown. The functional connection between MSH6 and the known breast cancer predisposition gene product BRCA1 suggests that the MSH6 gene may also play a role in breast cancer predisposition. METHODS: We analysed 38 breast cancer families with colorectal and/or endometrial cancer for germline mutations in MSH6. RESULTS: No disease associated mutations were detected among the breast cancer families. However, mutation analysis revealed a Glu995STOP mutation in an atypical HNPCC family. The same mutation was found in a patient with both breast and colorectal carcinoma in our previous study, and haplotype analysis confirmed a common ancestral origin. The Glu995STOP mutation was further examined in an extensive series of 245 colorectal and 142 breast carcinoma patients with a family history of breast, colorectal, and/or endometrial carcinoma, and in 268 healthy population controls, but none was found to carry the mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MSH6 may not be the underlying gene in breast cancer families with a history of colorectal and/or endometrial cancer. The Glu995STOP founder mutation is not a familial breast cancer predisposition allele and makes only a limited contribution to colorectal cancer burden in Finland.

Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: a combined analysis of 22 population based studies.

A recent report estimated the breast cancer risks in carriers of the three Ashkenazi founder mutations to be higher than previously published estimates derived from population based studies. In an attempt to confirm this, the breast and ovarian cancer risks associated with the three Ashkenazi founder mutations were estimated using families included in a previous meta-analysis of populatrion based studies. The estimated breast cancer risks for each of the founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were similar to the corresponding estimates based on all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in the meta-analysis. These estimates appear to be consistent with the observed prevalence of the mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Genetic changes in inherited and sporadic ovarian carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization: extensive similarity except for a difference at chromosome 2q24-q32.

Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer a predisposition to breast as well as ovarian carcinoma. Except for loss of the respective wild-type allele, somatic genetic changes needed for the progression of inherited ovarian tumors are unknown. A genome-wide search for such alterations was performed by comparative genomic hybridization analysis on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive (n = 20) ovarian carcinoma specimens. Comparison with sporadic ovarian carcinomas (n = 20) revealed extensive genetic similarity between the inherited and sporadic carcinomas with the sole exception of a frequent gain of 2q24-q32 in the inherited group, suggesting the presence of an oncogene at 2q24-q32 operating in the absence of BRCA1 function. The overall similarity of gains and losses by comparative genomic hybridization suggests a common main pathway in tumor progression of both inherited and sporadic ovarian carcinomas.

p53, CHK2, and CHK1 genes in Finnish families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: further evidence of CHK2 in inherited cancer predisposition.

Germ-line mutations in the p53 gene predispose individuals to Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). The cell cycle checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 act upstream of p53 in DNA damage responses, and recently rare germ-line mutations in CHK2 were reported in LFS families. We have analyzed CHK1, CHK2, and p53 genes for mutations in 44 Finnish families with LFS, Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome, or families phenotypically suggestive of LFS with conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis. Five different disease-causing mutations were observed in 7 families (7 of 44 families; 15.9%): 4 in the p53 gene (5 of 44 families; 11.4%) and 1 in the CHK2 gene (2 of 44 families; 4.5%). Interestingly, the other CHK2-mutation carrier also has a mutation in the MSH6 gene. The cancer phenotype in the CHK2-families was not characteristic of LFS, and may indicate variable phenotypic expression in the rare families with CHK2 mutations. No mutations in the CHK1 gene were identified. Additional work is necessary to completely unravel the molecular background of LFS.

Evidence for involvement of BRCA1 in sporadic breast carcinomas.

The hereditary breast cancer gene BRCA1 previously has been localized to chromosome 17q21. We looked for evidence of involvement of this region of chromosome 17 in 130 sporadic breast cancers. Seventeen polymorphic sequence tagged site markers were examined in these tumors between the D17S250 and D17S579 loci to screen for deletions as measured by loss of heterozygosity. The smallest common region that was deleted occurred in the approximately 120-kilobase interval between the D17S846 and D17S746 loci within the BRCA1 region. Delineation of this commonly deleted area should accelerate attempts to identify the involved gene(s) and its relationship to BRCA1.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 233 unselected Finnish ovarian carcinoma patients.

Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. In Finland, 20 different BRCA1/2 mutations have been identified, and 13 of them are founder mutations that account for the vast majority of Finnish BRCA1/2 families. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected Finnish ovarian carcinoma patients and to evaluate the relationship between mutation carrier status and personal/family history of cancer. Two hundred and thirty-three patients were screened for all the 20 BRCA1/2 mutations known in the Finnish population. Additionally, a subgroup of patients with personal history of breast cancer and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer was screened for novel BRCA1/2 mutations. Thirteen patients (5.6%) had mutations: eleven in BRCA1 and two in BRCA2. All the mutation-positive patients were carriers of the previously known Finnish BRCA1/2 mutations, and seven recurrent founder mutations accounted for 12 of the 13 mutations detected. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds of mutation for ovarian carcinoma patients. The most significant predictor of a mutation was the presence of both breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman, but family history of breast cancer was also strongly related to mutation carrier status. Although BRCA1/2 mutation testing is not warranted in the general Finnish ovarian cancer patient population, patients who have also been diagnosed with breast cancer or have family history of breast or breast and ovarian cancer could benefit from referral to genetic counselling and mutation testing.

Haplotype analysis in Icelandic and Finnish BRCA2 999del5 breast cancer families.

The 999del5 mutation is the single, strong BRCA2 founder mutation in Iceland and the most common BRCA1/2 founder mutation in Finland. To evaluate the origin and time since spreading of the 999del5 mutation in Iceland and in Finland, we constructed haplotypes with polymorphic markers within and flanking the BRCA2 gene in a set of 18 Icelandic and 10 Finnish 999del5 breast cancer families. All Icelandic families analysed shared a common core haplotype of about 1.7 cM. The common ancestors for the Icelandic families studied were estimated to trace back to 340-1000 years, not excluding the possibility that the mutation was brought to Iceland during the settlement of the country. Analysis of the Finnish families revealed two distinct haplotypes. A rare one, found in three families in the old settlement region in southwestern Finland, shared a four-marker (0.5 cM) core haplotype with the Icelandic 999del5 haplotype. A distinct approximately 6 cM haplotype was shared by seven 999del5 Finnish families estimated to have a common ancestry 140-300 years ago. These families cluster in two geographical regions in Finland, in the very same area as those with the rare haplotype and also in the most eastern, late settlement region of Finland. The results may indicate a common ancient origin for the 999del5 mutation in Iceland and in Finland, but distinct mutational events cannot be ruled out. The surprising finding of the same mutation in two completely different haplotypes in a sparsely populated area in Finland may suggest gene conversion.

Multiple founder effects and geographical clustering of BRCA1 and BRCA2 families in Finland.

In the Finnish breast and ovarian cancer families six BRCA1 and five BRCA2 mutations have been found recurrently. Some of these recurrent mutations have also been seen elsewhere in the world, while others are exclusively of Finnish origin. A haplotype analysis of 26 Finnish families carrying a BRCA1 mutation and 20 families with a BRCA2 mutation indicated that the carriers of each recurrent mutation have common ancestors. The common ancestors were estimated to trace back to 7-36 generations (150-800 years). The time estimates and the geographical clustering of these founder mutations in Finland are in concordance with the population history of this country. Analysis of the cancer phenotypes showed differential ovarian cancer expression in families carrying mutations in the 5' and 3' ends of the BRCA1 gene, and earlier age of ovarian cancer onset in families with BRCA1 mutations compared with families with BRCA2 mutations. The identification of prominent and regional BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in Finland will have significant impact on diagnostics in Finnish breast and ovarian cancer families. An isolated population with known history and multiple local founder effects in multigenic disease may offer distinct advantages also for mapping novel predisposing genes.

Familial breast cancer in southern Finland: how prevalent are breast cancer families and can we trust the family history reported by patients?

We evaluate the validity of the family history of breast cancer reported by the patient and the number of families and individuals at risk and potentially benefiting from surveillance. Family history of cancer was systematically screened in three different series of breast cancer patients. Breast cancer families were defined by the selection criterion of at least three first- or second-degree relatives with breast or ovarian cancer (including the proband) and their genealogy and cancer diagnoses were confirmed. Family history of breast or ovarian cancer was reported by approximately 30% of the patients and 7-9% were classified as breast cancer families. On average, there were 3.1 healthy female (age: 20-70 years) first degree relatives per family potentially at high risk. Index patients reported 87% of all confirmed diagnoses and the primary site was correct in 93-95% of the reported cases. The incompleteness and errors in accuracy should be considered in epidemiological studies and verification of the diagnoses is important when deciding clinical management.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Finnish ovarian carcinoma families.

Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. In Finland, 21 different BRCA1/2 mutations have been identified and 14 of the mutations are founders that account for the great majority of all BRCA1/2 mutations. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of the 21 BRCA1/2 mutations in Finnish ovarian carcinoma families. Mutations were screened in 23 families with at least two cases of invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the first-degree relatives. The families had been identified from a population-based series of 559 Finnish epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients. Fourteen of the families were site-specific ovarian carcinoma families, while breast cancer was present in nine families. Mutations were detected in five families: two had a mutation in BRCA1 and three in BRCA2. In one family, a novel, apparently disease-causing missense mutation in the BRCA2 gene had been identified previously. Thus, 26% of the Finnish ovarian carcinoma families were found to be BRCA1/2 mutation-positive. Strong ovarian cancer family history and early-onset breast cancer were strongly associated with BRCA1/2 mutation status; all families with three ovarian carcinoma cases or early-onset breast cancer (<50 years) were mutation-positive, whereas all families with later-onset breast cancer as well as the majority (9/11) of the site-specific ovarian carcinoma families with minor ovarian cancer history (i.e. two affected cases) remained mutation-negative.