RESUMO
Background: Invasive management of stable coronary artery disease is still a controversial topic. The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluate the benefits and harms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from 2018 to August 7, 2022. We included SRs with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the question of interest. We assessed the methodological quality of the SRs with the AMSTAR-2 tool. We summarized the results of the outcomes for each SR. We calculated the degree of overlap of the RCTs included in the SRs using the corrected covered area (CCA). Results: We found 10 SRs with meta-analyses. The SRs included 3 to 15 RCTs. The degree of overlap among the SRs was very high (CCA > 15%). No SR evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE system and 9 out of 10 had critically low methodological quality. The SRs reported heterogeneous results for the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and angina. On the other hand, for the outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and stroke, all SRs agreed that there were no differences between PCI and OMT alone. Conclusions: We found 10 SRs on the use of PCI compared to OMT alone for patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, none had high methodological quality, none evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach, and the results were inconsistent for several outcomes. This variability in evidence may result in divergent clinical decisions for the management of stable coronary artery disease among healthcare professionals. It is necessary to perform a high-quality SR using the GRADE approach to clarify the balance of benefits and harms of PCI.
RESUMO
Background: Short sleep duration in healthcare professionals is a recurring concern among researchers. On the other hand, the prevalence of burnout in this population group is experiencing exponential growth. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the association between sleep duration and burnout in healthcare professionals. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Data were collected by applying a non-probabilistic convenience sampling, considering a sample of 300 healthcare professionals from the public sector in Peru. The association between variables was explored using multivariate logistic regression. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The results of the analysis in the crude models revealed that both men and women who slept < 7 h during workdays and days off were 8.33 (95% CI = 2.68-13.99, p = 0.004) and 17.18 (95% CI = 10.50-23.87, p < 0.001) times more likely to have burnout compared to those who reported ≥7 h, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, the association remained statistically significant. Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore the critical importance of sleep duration in the incidence of burnout among healthcare professionals. In the context of the global challenges to the mental and physical health of these professionals, our results highlight the urgent need to implement strategies at the organizational and individual level. This includes promoting a better work-life balance, and effective stress management and improved sleep quality.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Psicológico , Duração do Sono , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Sono , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES.: Motivation for the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mortality rate from this disease was higher in adults and the elderly. Therefore, it is important to identify the factors that were associated with mortality from COVID-19 in adults, by age group. Main findings. Chronic neurological disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and cancer increased the risk of dying from COVID-19 in the three age groups we analyzed, which were made up of hospitalized patients from Lima and Callao. The risk of mortality associated with comorbidities was higher in patients aged 18 to 29. Implications. This study helps to identify the groups of patients with the highest risk of death from COVID-19, according to age group and type of comorbidity. . To evaluate comorbidities associated with mortality in adult patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in hospitals in Lima and Callao. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from adult patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 reported to the National Epidemiological Surveillance System of the Peruvian Ministry of Health from March to October 2020. We estimated relative risks with 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression models with robust variance to assess comorbidities associated with mortality by age group: young adults (18-29 years), adults (30-59 years) and older adults (≥60 years). RESULTS.: We included 2366 young adults, 23,781 adults and 25,356 older adults. Older adults had the highest mortality (63.7%) compared to adults (27.1%) and young adults (8.5%). Regardless of age group, the presence of neurological disease, renal disease, liver disease, and cancer was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Additionally, cardiovascular disease was also a risk factor in young adults; obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, and immunodeficiency in adults; and obesity and chronic lung disease in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS.: Regardless of age groups, individuals with chronic neurologic disease, renal disease, liver disease, and cancer were at high risk of death from COVID-19.
OBJETIVOS.: Motivation for the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mortality rate from this disease was higher in adults and the elderly. Therefore, it is important to identify the factors that were associated with mortality from COVID-19 in adults, by age group. Main findings. Chronic neurological disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and cancer increased the risk of dying from COVID-19 in the three age groups we analyzed, which were made up of hospitalized patients from Lima and Callao. The risk of mortality associated with comorbidities was higher in patients aged 18 to 29. Implications. This study helps to identify the groups of patients with the highest risk of death from COVID-19, according to age group and type of comorbidity. . Evaluar las comorbilidades asociadas a la mortalidad en pacientes adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19 de diferentes grupos de edad en hospitales de Lima y Callao. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: En este estudio de cohorte retrospectiva analizamos datos de pacientes adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19, notificados al Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica del Ministerio de Salud de Perú de marzo a octubre del 2020. Se estimaron riesgos relativos con intervalos de confianza al 95% mediante modelos de regresión de Poisson con varianza robusta para evaluar las comorbilidades asociadas a la mortalidad por grupos de edad: jóvenes (18-29 años), adultos (30-59 años) y mayores (≥60 años). RESULTADOS.: Se incluyeron 2366 jóvenes, 23781 adultos y 25356 adultos mayores en el análisis. Los adultos mayores presentaron la mortalidad más alta (63,7%) en comparación con adultos (27,1%) y jóvenes (8,5%). Independientemente del grupo de edad, la presencia de enfermedad neurológica, enfermedad renal, enfermedad hepática y cáncer se asoció a un mayor riesgo de mortalidad. Adicionalmente, la enfermedad cardiovascular fue también un factor de riesgo en los jóvenes; la obesidad, la diabetes, la enfermedad cardiovascular, la enfermedad pulmonar crónica y la inmunodeficiencia en los adultos; y la obesidad y la enfermedad pulmonar crónica en los mayores. CONCLUSIONES: Independientemente de los grupos de edad, los individuos con enfermedad neurológica crónica, enfermedad renal, enfermedad hepática y cáncer tendrían un alto riesgo de morir por la COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hepatopatias , Neoplasias , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Criança , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Peru/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Comorbidade , Fatores de Risco , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
Introducción. En el contexto de la pandemia por la COVID-19 es escasa la información de factores asociados al cumplimiento del tratamiento antituberculoso en las zonas de alta prevalencia de tuberculosis. Objetivo. Evaluar si existe asociación entre el apoyo social, la preocupación por el contagio de COVID-19 y el conocimiento de la tuberculosis, frente al incumplimiento del tratamiento antituberculoso. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio transversal de pacientes en tratamiento antituberculoso durante los meses de enero a marzo del 2022 en centros ubicados en áreas de alta prevalencia de tuberculosis en Lima. Se utilizó el cuestionario de Morisky Green-Levine para evaluar el cumplimiento del tratamiento como variable dependiente; las variables independientes se evaluaron usando el Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey para determinar el apoyo social percibido y la preocupación por la infección de COVID-19, y el test de Batalla para evaluar el conocimiento del paciente sobre su enfermedad. Se utilizó la regresión de Poisson con varianza robusta para determinar la asociación entre las variables. Resultados. De un total de 101 participantes (73,3 % hombres y edad media 35,1 ± 16 años), el 51,5 % no observaron el tratamiento antituberculoso. El nivel de preocupación medio o alto de contagiarse y desarrollar COVID-19 se asoció con una mayor prevalencia de incumplimiento del tratamiento (razón de prevalencia: 1,68; intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,09-2,57) (ajustada por las variables de confusión consideradas). Conclusiones. El incumplimiento del tratamiento antituberculoso es una condición frecuente entre los pacientes de una zona de alta prevalencia de tuberculosis en Lima especialmente entre aquellos con mayor preocupación al contagio por el virus de SARS- CoV-2, causante de la COVID-19.
Introduction. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, information on factors associated with adherence to antituberculosis treatment in areas with high prevalence of tuberculosis is scarce. Objective. To evaluate whether there is an association between social support, concern about COVID-19 infection and knowledge about tuberculosis, and non-adherence to antituberculosis treatment. Materials and methods. A cross-sectional study was carried out on patients under antituberculosis treatment, from January to March, 2022, in centers located in areas with a high prevalence of tuberculosis in Lima. We used the Morisky Green-Levine questionnaire to assess adherence to treatment as the dependent variable; the independent variables were evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey for perceived social support and concern about COVID-19 infection, and the Battle Test to assess patients' knowledge about their disease. We used Poisson regression with robust variance to evaluate the association between the independent variables and the dependent one. Results. Out of 101 participants (73.3% male with an average age of 35.1 ±16 years), 51.5% were non-adherent to antituberculosis treatment. Medium or high level of concern about getting COVID-19 was associated with a higher prevalence of non-adherence to treatment (odds ratio: 1.68; 95 % confidence interval: 1.09-2.57) (adjusted for considered confounding variables). Conclusions. Non-adherence is a frequent condition among patients living in an area with a high prevalence of tuberculosis in Lima, especially among those with a higher concern for COVID-19 infection.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Pulmonar , Apoio Social , Cooperação do Paciente , COVID-19RESUMO
RESUMEN Objetivos. Evaluar las comorbilidades asociadas a la mortalidad en pacientes adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19 de diferentes grupos de edad en hospitales de Lima y Callao. Materiales y métodos. En este estudio de cohorte retrospectiva analizamos datos de pacientes adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19, notificados al Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica del Ministerio de Salud de Perú de marzo a octubre del 2020. Se estimaron riesgos relativos con intervalos de confianza al 95% mediante modelos de regresión de Poisson con varianza robusta para evaluar las comorbilidades asociadas a la mortalidad por grupos de edad: jóvenes (18-29 años), adultos (30-59 años) y mayores (≥60 años). Resultados. Se incluyeron 2366 jóvenes, 23781 adultos y 25356 adultos mayores en el análisis. Los adultos mayores presentaron la mortalidad más alta (63,7%) en comparación con adultos (27,1%) y jóvenes (8,5%). Independientemente del grupo de edad, la presencia de enfermedad neurológica, enfermedad renal, enfermedad hepática y cáncer se asoció a un mayor riesgo de mortalidad. Adicionalmente, la enfermedad cardiovascular fue también un factor de riesgo en los jóvenes; la obesidad, la diabetes, la enfermedad cardiovascular, la enfermedad pulmonar crónica y la inmunodeficiencia en los adultos; y la obesidad y la enfermedad pulmonar crónica en los mayores. Conclusiones: Independientemente de los grupos de edad, los individuos con enfermedad neurológica crónica, enfermedad renal, enfermedad hepática y cáncer tendrían un alto riesgo de morir por la COVID-19.
ABSTRACT Objectives. To evaluate comorbidities associated with mortality in adult patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in hospitals in Lima and Callao. Materials and methods. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from adult patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 reported to the National Epidemiological Surveillance System of the Peruvian Ministry of Health from March to October 2020. We estimated relative risks with 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression models with robust variance to assess comorbidities associated with mortality by age group: young adults (18-29 years), adults (30-59 years) and older adults (≥60 years). Results. We included 2366 young adults, 23,781 adults and 25,356 older adults. Older adults had the highest mortality (63.7%) compared to adults (27.1%) and young adults (8.5%). Regardless of age group, the presence of neurological disease, renal disease, liver disease, and cancer was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Additionally, cardiovascular disease was also a risk factor in young adults; obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, and immunodeficiency in adults; and obesity and chronic lung disease in the elderly. Conclusions. Regardless of age groups, individuals with chronic neurologic disease, renal disease, liver disease, and cancer were at high risk of death from COVID-19.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Grupos EtáriosRESUMO
Introducción: La Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana (SOCIMEP), a través de su Comité Académico, planifica y realiza actividades de educación médica, tales como conferencias y talleres. Objetivo: Describir las actividades académicas organizadas por las sociedades científicas de estudiantes de medicina (SOCEM) del Perú durante los años 2015 - 2018. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. Se revisaron 119 reportes de actividades realizadas por las SOCEM afiliadas a SOCIMEP. Dichas actividades fueron reportadas a través de un formato estandarizado, en el cual se registran las principales características de la actividad y temática abordadas. Resultados: Se reportó un total de 783 actividades (2015=68, 2016=70, 2017=263, 2018=382) que sumaron una duración de 3 661 horas académicas e involucraron a 24 050 asistentes. Se observó que el mayor número de actividades organizadas abarcó temas del área de ciencias clínicas. Las actividades basadas en el aprendizaje entre pares fueron frecuentes (27,2 por ciento) y con un incremento del 8,8 por ciento al 28,8 por ciento durante los cuatro años. Conclusión: En el Perú, los estudiantes de medicina a través de las SOCEM realizan un gran número de actividades de educación médica, especialmente en ciencias clínicas. Estas actividades complementan la formación tanto de los estudiantes que participan como organizadores de actividades académicas como de los asistentes(AU)
Introduction: The Peruvian Student Medical Scientific Society (SOCIMEP), through its Academic Committee, plans and carries out medical education activities such as conferences and workshops. Objective: To describe the academic activities organized by the scientific societies of medical students (SOCEM) of Peru during 2015 - 2018. Material and methods: Retrospective descriptive study. A total of 119 reports of activities carried out by the SOCEM affiliated with SOCIMEP were reviewed. These activities were reported through a standardized format, in which the main characteristics of the activity and the topic addressed are recorded. Results: A total of 783 activities (2015=68, 2016=70, 2017=263, 2018=382), which totaled 3,661 academic hours and involved 24,050 participants, were reported. It was observed that the largest number of organized activities covered topics around clinical sciences. Activities based on peer learning were frequent (27.2 percent), with an increase from 8.8 percent to 28.8 percent during the four years. Conclusion: In Peru, medical students carry out many medical education activities through SOCEMs, especially in clinical sciences. These activities complement the training of both the students who participate as organizers of academic activities and those who attend them(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Estudantes de Medicina , Educação Médica , Promoção da Saúde , Sociedades Científicas/ética , Epidemiologia DescritivaRESUMO
Resumen Objetivos: Estimar la asociación entre tener conocimientos acerca del cáncer de cuello uterino (CaCu) y re alizarse una prueba de Papanicolaou (PAP) en mujeres peruanas mayores de 30 años. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un análisis secundario de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar de los años 2015 al 2017. El nivel conocimiento fue evaluado utilizando las preguntas: ¿considera usted que el cáncer se puede prevenir?, ¿alguna vez ha oído hablar del CaCu?, ¿alguna vez ha oído hablar del virus del papiloma humano (VPH)? y ¿considera que el VPH puede causar CaCu? La variable dependiente fue la realización de un PAP en los dos últimos años. Para estimar la asociación se utilizaron modelos lineales generalizados de la familia Poisson crudos y ajustados. La medida de asociación fue la razón de prevalencia ajustada (RPa) con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95% (IC 95%). Resultados: Se analizaron datos de 21 563 mujeres. La prevalencia de haberse realizado un PAP en los últimos dos años fue 52,4%. Se encontró que, quienes respondieron que se puede prevenir el cáncer (RPa = 1,09; IC 95%: 1,01-1,17), que habían oído hablar del CaCu (RPa = 1,27; IC 95%: 1,14-1,40) o del VPH (RPa = 1,20; IC 95%:1,13-1,28) o que respondieron que el VPH podía causar CaCu (RPa = 1,21; IC 95%: 1,11 1,33) tuvieron una mayor prevalencia de haberse realizado un PAP en los últimos dos años. Conclusiones: Tener conocimientos sobre CaCu y VPH se asoció con haberse realizado un PAP en los últimos dos años.
Abstract Objetives: To estimate the association between having knowledge about cervical cancer (CC) and having a Pap test (PAP) in Peruvian women over 30 years old. Materials and Methods: A secondary analysis of the Demographic and Family Health Survey of the years 2015 to 2017 was carried out. The level of knowledge was evaluated using the questions, do you think that cancer can be prevented?, Have you ever heard of CC?, Have you ever heard of human papillomavirus (HPV)? And do you think HPV can cause CC? The dependent variable was the realization of a PAP in the last two years. To estimate the association, generalized linear models of the raw and adjusted Poisson family were used. The measure of association was the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) with its respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Data from 21 563 women were analyzed. The prevalence of having performed a PAP in the last two years was 52.4%. It was found that, those who responded that cancer can be prevented (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17), who had heard of CC (aPR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1 , 40) or HPV (aPR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13-1.28) or who responded that HPV could cause CC (aPR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11-1.33) had a higher prevalence of having performed a PAP in the last two years. Conclusions: Having knowledge about CC and HPV has been associated with having performed a PAP in the last two years.
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Teste de Papanicolaou , Peru/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Resumen. Introducción: La prolongación del intervalo QT en el electrocardiograma es un conocido factor de riesgo para desarrollar eventos cardiovasculares. En Latinoamérica existe poca evidencia acerca de la epidemiología de este tipo de alteraciones electrocardiográficas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia del intervalo QT corregido largo según cuatro fórmulas. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. Se realizó una revisión de 156 registros electrocardiográficos de 12 derivaciones realizados a pacientes mayores a 40 años. Las medidas se realizaron manualmente y posteriormente los valores se ajustaron a la frecuencia cardiaca mediante cuatro fórmulas validadas existentes. Se consideró intervalo QT largo cuando la duración sobrepasaba los 470 ms. Resultados: De los 156 registros analizados, 55.7% de los registros pertenecieron a pacientes de sexo femenino y la edad media fue 70.3 ± 9.7 años. 9.6% de los registros fueron considerados como largos mediante la fórmula de Bazzet, 4.4% mediante la fórmula de Hodges, 3.8% mediante la fórmula de Fridericia y 3.2% mediante la fórmula deFramingham. La fórmula de Fridericia fue hallada como la más consistente para ajustar el intervalo QT a la frecuencia cardiaca. Conclusión: Dependiendo de la fórmula utilizada la prevalencia del intervalo QT largo varió significativamente. La fórmula de Fridericia fue la que demostró mejor consistencia.
Abstract. Introduction: The prolongation of the QT interval in the electrocardiogram is a well-known risk factor for developing cardiovascular events. In Latin America there is no much evidence about the epidemiology of electrocardiographic alterations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of long corrected QT interval according to four formulas. Methodology: Retrospective descriptive study. A total of 156 electrocardiographic records of 12 referrals made to patients older than 40 years were review. The measurements were made manually and later the values were adjusted to the heart rate by means of four existing validated formulas. The long QT interval was considered when the duration exceeded 470ms. Results: Of the 156 records analyzed, 55.7% of the records belonged to female patients and the mean age was 70.3 ± 9.7 years. 9.6% of the records were considered long using the Bazzet formula, 4.4% according to the Hodges formula, 3.8% according to the Fridericia formula and 3.2% according to the Framingham formula. The formula of Fridericia was found to be the most consistent to adjust the QT interval to the heart rate. Conclusion: Depending on the formula used, the prevalence of the long QT interval varied significantly. The formula of Fridericia was the one that showed the best consistency.
Resumo. Introdução: O prolongamento do intervalo QT no eletrocardiograma é um fator de risco conhecido para o desenvolvimento de eventos cardiovasculares. Na América Latina, há poucas evidências sobre a epidemiologia desse tipo de alteração eletrocardiográfica. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a prevalência do intervalo QT longo corrigido de acordo com quatro fórmulas. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo retrospectivo. Uma revisão de 156 registros eletrocardiográficos de 12 derivações realizadas em pacientes com mais de 40 anos foi realizada. As medidas foram feitas manualmente e posteriormente os valores foram ajustados à freqüência cardíaca por meio de quatro fórmulas validadas existentes. O intervalo QT longo foi considerado quando a duração ultrapassou 470 ms. Resultados: Dos 156 prontuários analisados, 55,7% dos prontuários pertenciam a pacientes do sexo feminino e a média de idade foi de 70,3 ± 9,7 anos. 9,6% dos registros foram considerados longos usando a fórmula de Bazzet, 4,4% usando a fórmula de Hodges, 3,8% usando a fórmula de Fridericia e 3,2% usando a fórmula de Fraingham. A fórmula de Fridericia foi considerada a mais consistente para ajustar o intervalo QT à frequência cardíaca. Conclusão: Dependendo da fórmula utilizada, a prevalência do intervalo QT longo variou significativamente. A fórmula da Fridericia foi a que apresentou a melhor consistência.