[Current problems of polypharmacy in geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity.]

The article presents an overview of the current problems of polypharmacy in geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity. The article contains information about emerging adverse drug reactions, as well as methods for diagnosing, correcting and preventing phototoxic and photoallergic reactions in patients of older age groups. The main aspects of dermatological support in the system of long-term care for geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity are outlined. Clinical signs of senile xerosis and skin manifestations of adverse drug reactions were studied when taking drugs with the risk of photosensitization before and after the use of a photoprotector in elderly patients.

What is the relationship between photosensitizing drugs and skin cancer?

ABSTRACT: Many medications are associated with phototoxicity or photoallergy, the two types of photosensitivity. Recently, a warning related to increased skin cancer risk was added to the labeling of the popular diuretic hydrochlorothiazide. This article reviews some photosensitizing medications and describes patient education on preventing and recognizing photosensitivity reactions and skin cancer.

Photodermatitis and ocular changes in nine horses after ingestion of wild parsnip (pastinaca sativa).

BACKGROUND: Primary photosensitization rarely occurs in horses and can easily be misinterpreted. Descriptions of the disease in horses after ingestion of parsnip are lacking. The aim of this case series was to describe the dermatological and ocular changes due to photosensitization and to raise awareness of parsnip being a possible aetiologic agent. CASE PRESENTATION: Nine horses from three different stables in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, presented variable degrees of erythema, scaling, crusting and necrosis of unpigmented skin at the head and prepuce. Horses were of different breeds with a median age of 15 ± 5.9 years. A mild leukocytosis was diagnosed in 1/9 horses at admission. Analyzed liver enzymes were within the reference ranges in all horses. Ocular changes were diagnosed as follows: blepharitis (3/9), conjunctivitis (7/9), corneal edema without additional signs of keratitis and/or uveitis (2/9), corneal edema with signs of uveitis (1/9) and photophobia (4/9). One horse developed a fluorescein positive corneal erosion. Skin biopsy (1/9) revealed a moderate to severe acute, eosinophilic and lymphocytic dermatitis with dermal edema and vasculitis. All stables housing these patients fed hay from the same distributer. Analyzed hay samples showed high contents of wild parsnip (plants, seeds, roots). Wild parsnip is widespread in Europe and contains furocoumarins, a family of photodynamic pigments, which may cause primary photodermatitis, keratoconjunctivitis and uveitis. Horses were treated according to severity of clinical symptoms systemically with flunixine meglumine (1.1 mg/kg BW 1-2x/day) or prednisolone (1 mg/kg BW 1x/day). Topically, either gentamicin (3x/day), dexamethasone (2-3x/day) and/or atropine (1x/day) were used. Skin care was provided with almond oil or dexpanthenol (2x/day). All horses were kept in a dark environment or were treated with sunscreen and facemasks. Duration of treatment varied from 6-30 days (median 11.3 days). CONCLUSION: Ingestion of wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) can induce primary photosensitization with dermatitis and ocular injury in horses. In times of extreme weather, hay may alter in botanical composition, resulting in high amounts of uncharacteristic plants causing novel problems.

Tricyclic antidepressant-induced photosensitivity; A case report and systematic review.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are still widely used and are available to purchase without prescription in some countries. Awareness of adverse cutaneous drug reactions is essential. METHOD: We reported a case of photo-distributed hyperpigmentation due to imipramine and carried out a systematic search of the related articles using the search terms "tricyclic antidepressants" or "tricyclic antidepressive agents", and "hyperpigmentation" or "photosensitivity disorder". Fifty non-duplicate citations were identified of which 28 articles which were independently assessed in full. The review was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42018107338. RESULTS: The remaining 25 articles met our inclusion criteria. Photo-distributed hyperpigmentation tricyclic antidepressant-induced photosensitivity reactions (TIPs) was the most common presentation. In 21 cases, this presented as an asymptomatic discolouration of exposed sites. Imipramine (81%), amitriptyline (9.5%), desipramine hydrochloride (4.8%) and mirtazapine (4.8%) were reported to be the culprit drugs. Nineteen were female with a mean age at presentation of 55 years. Mean duration from commencing the culprit drug until the development of discolouration was 10.4 years. Mean daily dose was 222.7 mg for imipramine. Histology was characteristic with golden-brown or brownish granules deposited in dermis. Staining for Masson-Fontana and MEL-5 was positive in all cases. Phototesting had not been done in cases prior to ours (negative 3 months after discontinuation of imipramine). Three further reports of suspected TIP presented with non-specific and eczematous eruption. The two presentations were reported along with systemic problems (thrombocytopenia and hepatic injury). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the characteristic features of exposed site hyperpigmentation of TCA-induced photosensitivity occurring after prolonged drug exposure in many cases.

Retrospective analysis of skin photosensitivity induced by pirfenidone.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Knowledge regarding the association between photosensitivity and pirfenidone is based mainly on case reports. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of photosensitivity associated with pirfenidone. METHODS: We collected studies on photosensitivity induced by pirfenidone published from 2008 to 31 August 2021 in Chinese and English for a retrospective analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The median age was 70 years (range 57-80) in 22 patients with pirfenidone-induced photosensitivity. The dose at the onset of symptoms ranged from 600 to 2403 mg for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pirfenidone-induced photosensitivity occurred within 1 week in some patients and up to 8 months in others. The most common clinical manifestation of photosensitivity caused by pirfenidone was itching on body parts exposed to sunlight (back of hands, face, neck, and limbs) in 15 patients followed by erythema in 13 patients. Histopathological examination revealed necrotic keratinocytes, lymphocytic inflammatory cell infiltrate, hyperkeratosis and liquefaction degeneration in 5 patients. The photosensitivity test showed a markedly decreased minimum erythema dose (MED) of 7-228 mJ/cm2 UV-B in 4 patients and 4.86-12 J/cm2 UV-A in 5 patients. The clinical symptoms were significantly improved or completely relieved with a median time of 4 weeks (range 1-8) after drug withdrawal, dose reduction or systemic and topical glucocorticoid therapy. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the potential phototoxic effects of pirfenidone and should inform patients to take pirfenidone during (or after) a meal, avoid sun exposure, wear protective clothing, and apply broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet UVA and UVB protection.

In vitro assessment of the photo(geno)toxicity associated with Lapatinib, a Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor.

The epidermal growth factor receptors EGFR and HER2 are the main targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The quinazoline derivative lapatinib (LAP) is used since 2007 as dual TKI in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and currently, it is used as an oral anticancer drug for the treatment of solid tumors such as breast and lung cancer. Although hepatotoxicity is its main side effect, it makes sense to investigate the ability of LAP to induce photosensitivity reactions bearing in mind that BRAF (serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf) inhibitors display a considerable phototoxic potential and that afloqualone, a quinazoline-marketed drug, causes photodermatosis. Metabolic bioactivation of LAP by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 leads to chemically reactive N-dealkylated (N-LAP) and O-dealkylated (O-LAP) derivatives. In this context, the aim of the present work is to explore whether LAP and its N- and O-dealkylated metabolites can induce photosensitivity disorders by evaluating their photo(geno)toxicity through in vitro studies, including cell viability as well as photosensitized protein and DNA damage. As a matter of fact, our work has demonstrated that not only LAP, but also its metabolite N-LAP have a clear photosensitizing potential. They are both phototoxic and photogenotoxic to cells, as revealed by the 3T3 NRU assay and the comet assay, respectively. By contrast, the O-LAP does not display relevant photobiological properties. Remarkably, the parent drug LAP shows the highest activity in membrane phototoxicity and protein oxidation, whereas N-LAP is associated with the highest photogenotoxicity, through oxidation of purine bases, as revealed by detection of 8-Oxo-dG.

Benzodiazepine-induced photosensitivity reactions: A compilation of cases from literature review with Naranjo causality assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Benzodiazepines have been reported to cause photosensitivity reactions. We characterized the clinical presentation and diagnosis of benzodiazepine-associated photosensitivity and adjudicated these cases for a causal association with benzodiazepines. METHODS: A literature search on PubMed's "MeSH" search feature and CINAHL (1964 to 2019) was performed using search terms: benzodiazepine, photosensitivity, and photosensitivity disorders/chemically induced. We applied the Naranjo scale, a standardized causality assessment algorithm, to identified cases. RESULTS: We identified eight published cases, with 50% of patients being female with a mean age of 46.3 years. Alprazolam, tetrazepam, clobazam, and clorazepate induced phototoxic reactions. Chlordiazepoxide induced one photoallergic reaction. Photosensitivity occurred between 1-3 days (37.5%), 7-14 days (25%), and >14 days (25%). Photosensitivity resolved after drug discontinuation within 2 weeks (62.5%). Benzodiazepine rechallenge confirmed photosensitivity in 75% of cases. Photopatch testing was negative in two patients; however, these patients had positive oral provocation testing. However, an oral photoprovocation test, an ideal diagnostic test, was not administered to several patients. Despite these challenges, the Naranjo scale identified 5 cases as definite benzodiazepine-induced photosensitivity. CONCLUSION: Five benzodiazepines induced photosensitivity reactions. Five patients showed a definite association with the Naranjo scale. Reporting to pharmacovigilance databases may help identify other benzodiazepines causing photosensitivity reactions.

Photosensitization Induced by Heterophyllaea pustulata in Goats: Sequential Development of Skin Lesions.

Five adult Saanen goats received a single oral dose of Heterophyllaea pustulata containing 42.25 µg/kg rubiadin (anthraquinone) and 3 adult goats were untreated controls. All goats were exposed to sunlight and sequential ear skin biopsies were collected before treatment and at 32 hours, 3 days, 8 days, and 15 days after treatment. Changes at 32 hours after dosing included epidermal spongiosis, single cell death and acantholysis, an increased BAX/BCL-2 protein ratio, and dermal edema. Lesions at day 3 included epidermal and adnexal necrosis, crust formation, and acanthosis. Acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and dermal fibrosis and neovascularization were present at day 15. The pro-apoptotic (BAX)/anti-apoptotic (BCL-2) protein ratio increased at 32 hours, whereas epidermal and dermal PCNA immunolabeling increased between days 8 and 15 after treatment. The cutaneous lesions were consistent with sunlight-induced damage, and the occurrence in treated but not control goats indicates photosensitization.

Light and electron microscopy of chlorpromazine-induced hyperpigmentation.

Chlorpromazine may induce abnormal skin hyperpigmentation in exposed areas, described as slate-gray, purple, or blue-grayish discoloration. A 58-year-old man with schizophrenia, had been taking chlorpromazine for 5 years, and his sun-exposed skin areas exhibited a blue-grayish color. Large deposits of brown pigment and granular basophilic material were seen in the dermis with light microscopy. HMB-45 and anti-Melan-A antibody immunostaining labeled some pigment in the dermis. Transmission electron microscopy identified deposits among dermal collagen bundles collagen in both transverse and longitudinal sections. In the latter, an arboriform aspect of deposits was quite clear, and some melanophages were also seen. The three-dimensional examination of the dermis with scanning electron microscopy also identified deposits, which at higher magnification demonstrated an appearance in the shape of leaves, grass-like, interspersed with normal collagen. These results suggest a complex pathogenic mechanism, including deposition of dermal melanin together with drug itself and potentially additional unknown metabolites.

Photosensitivity and cancer immune-targeted therapies.

The novel group of immunological agents used for solid tumors has importantly improved the quality of life and the survival rate of oncologic patients. Compared to conventional chemotherapy agents, they are more effective and less toxic. However, adverse cutaneous effects are commonly observed, and in some cases, they may induce treatment discontinuation, with heavy impact on patient prognosis. Among these, photosensitive reactions, either phototoxic or photoallergic, are increasing. Much remains to be clarified on the understanding of their prevention, diagnosis, and management. We have reviewed the literature about photosensitive reactions occurring during oncologic immunotherapies. Early dermatological diagnosis and adequate management, with oncologist's cooperation, is fundamental.

Systemic drug photosensitivity-Culprits, impact and investigation in 122 patients.

BACKGROUND: Systemic drugs are a potentially reversible cause of photosensitivity. We explore prevalence, impact, phototest findings and culprit drugs. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients was diagnosed with drug-induced photosensitivity in a specialist photoinvestigation centre (2000-2016), using data recorded in standardized pro forma. Patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation. Monochromator phototesting was performed to 300 ± 5 nm, 320 ± 10 nm, 330 ± 10 nm, 350 ± 20 nm, 370 ± 20 nm, 400 ± 20 nm, 500 ± 20nm and 600 ± 20 nm. Broadband UVA and solar-simulated radiation (SSR) testing were performed, and photopatch testing and laboratory tests examined for other causes of photosensitivity. DLQI was evaluated. RESULTS: Prevalence of drug-induced photosensitivity was 5.4% (122/2243) patients presenting with photosensitivity. Patients with drug-induced photosensitivity were 52.5% female; median 62 years (range 11-86); phototype I (17.2%), II (39.3%), III (26.2%), IV (6.5%), V (4.1%). Fifty-five (45.1%) patients had reduced erythemal thresholds on monochromator phototesting: 83.6%% to UVA alone, 14.5% to both UVA and UVB, 1.8% to UVA and visible light; 61.4% (n = 75) showed abnormal response to broadband UVR. Drugs implicated: quinine (11.5%), diuretics (10.7%; thiazide 9.8%), antifungals (9.8%), proton-pump-inhibitors (9.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (7.4%), anti-inflammatory drugs (6.6%), statins (5.7%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (4.9%), calcium channel antagonists (3.3%), anti-epileptics (3.3%), tricyclic antidepressants (3.3%), beta-blockers (2.5%), antibiotics (2.5%), others (≤1.6% cases each). Emerging culprits included azathioprine (2.5%) and biologics (TNF-α inhibitors, denosumab; 2.5%). Median DLQI was 11 (range 2-27) for the past year. CONCLUSION: Classically described photosensitizing drugs such as thiazides and quinine remain common offenders, while emerging culprits include biologics such as TNF-a inhibitors and proton-pump-inhibitors. There is very large impact on life quality; identification facilitates measures including drug cessation and implementation of appropriate photoprotection.

Acquired erythropoietic protoporphyria: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) is a semi-dominantly inherited porphyria presenting with photosensitivity during early childhood. Acquired EPP has been reported; however, data regarding this rare disorder are scarce. PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics of acquired EPP. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed by three reviewers. Studies describing patients with acquired EPP were included. Additionally, we present an index case of a 26-year-old patient who acquired clinically and biochemically typical EPP in association with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). RESULTS: We included 20 case reports describing 20 patients. Most (80%) patients were male of mean age 58 ± 13 years. In all patients, acquired EPP was associated with hematological disease, most commonly MDS (85%) followed by myeloproliferative disease (10%). In 86% of cases, hematological disease led to abnormality or somatic mutation in chromosome 18q (the locus of the ferrochelatase gene). The mean erythrocyte protoporphyrin IX concentration was very high (4286 µg/dL). Most (90%) patients presented with photosensitivity, 20% experienced blistering, and 25% presented with hepatic insufficiency, both uncommon in EPP. In 55% of patients, hematological disease was diagnosed after occurrence of cutaneous symptoms. Beta-carotene led to partial control of symptoms in 5 patients and resolution in another patient. Azacitidine treatment of MDS led to resolution of cutaneous symptoms in three patients. CONCLUSION: We present the distinct features of acquired EPP and highlight that any patient presenting with new-onset photosensitivity, irrespective of age should be evaluated for porphyria.

Photosensitivity induced by lomefloxacin versus other fluoroquinolones: A meta-analysis.

Lomefloxacin may be more likely than other fluoroquinolones to cause photosensitivity. However, the rate of photosensitivity is variable and a meta-analysis has yet to be performed. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the rate of photosensitivity between outpatients who received lomefloxacin and those who received other fluoroquinolones. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of outpatients through June 12, 2019. The study outcome was the rate of photosensitivity based on the intention-to-treat principle, estimated by risk difference (RD) as the primary analysis and Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) as the secondary analysis, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Four RCTs (total of 2295 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. A statistically higher risk of photosensitivity was found with lomefloxacin than with other fluoroquinolones (RD, 3.4%; 95% CI, 0.7%-6.2%; P-value = 0.013; I2 = 10.9%). The odds of photosensitivity was also significantly higher with lomefloxacin (Peto OR, 5.81; 95% CI, 3.34 to 10.11; P-value <0.001; I2 = 0%). This meta-analysis of RCTs found significantly higher photosensitivity with lomefloxacin compared to other fluoroquinolones. Considering this finding and given its lack of additional efficacy compared to other fluoroquinolones, lomefloxacin as a fluoroquinolone option should potentially be reconsidered.

The frequency of photosensitizing drug dispensings in Austria and Germany: a correlation with their photosensitizing potential based on published literature.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced photosensitivity refers to the development of cutaneous adverse events due to interaction between a pharmaceutical compound and sunlight. Although photosensitivity is a very commonly listed side-effect of systemic drugs, reliable data on its actual incidence are lacking so far. OBJECTIVES: A possible approach to evaluate the real-life extent of drug-induced photosensitivity would be an analysis of the frequency of exposure to a given photosensitizing drug combined with an indicator of its photosensitizing potential. This could serve as a basis for developing a pharmaceutical 'heatmap' of photosensitivity. METHODS: The present study investigated the number of reimbursed dispensed packages of potentially photosensitizing drugs in Germany (DE) and Austria (AT) between 2010 and 2017 based on nationwide health insurance-based databases. In addition, an indicator for the photosensitizing potential was established for each drug based on the number of reports on photosensitivity in the literature. RESULTS: This analysis includes means of 632 826 944 (+/-14 894 918) drug dispensings per year in DE and 113 270 754 (+/-1 964 690) in AT. Out of these, the mean percentage of drugs that enlist photosensitivity as a potential side-effect was 49.5% (±0.7) in DE and 48.2% (±1.2) in AT. When plotting the number of reimbursed dispensed packages vs. the number of reports on photosensitivity, two categories of drugs show high numbers for both parameters, that is diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). CONCLUSIONS: Diuretics and NSAIDs appear to be responsible for the greatest part of exposure to photosensitizing drugs with potential implication on public health.

Diltiazem-associated Photodistributed Hyperpigmentation.

Diltiazem is a calcium-channel blocker commonly used for the treatment of hypertension. Common adverse effects include dizziness, headache, and edema. Fewer than 20 cases of diltiazem-associated photodistributed hyperpigmentation have been reported in the literature. Here, we present the case of a 71-year-old woman with new-onset facial hyperpigmentation 6 months after initiating treatment with diltiazem.

A case of atezolizumab-induced photodistributed bullous pemphigoid.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy in recent years but is associated with unique immunologically mediated adverse effects. Immunotherapy-induced bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an uncommon but established reaction that portends significant management implications as in most instances systemic treatment is required. We report a case of immunotherapy-associated BP in a marked photodistribution, highlighting the diverse clinical presentations of this eruption.

Hydrochlorothiazide-induced photosensitivity in a psoriasis patient following exposure to narrow-band ultraviolet B excimer therapy.

Drug-induced photosensitivity develops when the use of oral or topical photosensitizing medications creates a rash after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Medications most commonly implicated in photosensitive drug reactions include amiodarone, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, thiazides, tetracycline antibiotics, chlorpromazine, and fluoroquinolones. It is generally believed that drug-induced photosensitivity is an UVA phenomenon, caused by UV wavelengths between 315 and 400 nm. Here, we present a case of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)-induced photosensitivity following exposure to 308-nm narrow-band (nb) UVB light emitted from an excimer laser in a patient undergoing treatment for plaque psoriasis. This patient had received biweekly treatments with the excimer laser for years prior without any history of adverse reactions. We believe that our patient suffered an acute photosensitivity to UVB due to new-onset HCTZ. Because nb UVB-emitting lasers are used to treat many dermatologic conditions, physicians should be aware of potential photosensitivity reactions, review medication lists and counsel patients accordingly.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Vemurafenib has been linked to dermatological adverse events in patients with melanoma, including an increased risk of rash, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, photosensitivity reaction and keratoacanthoma. However, there has been no systematic attempt to assess the dermatological toxicity data of vemurafenib associated with melanoma treatment. AIM: To evaluate the point prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma. METHODS: Searches were conducted of the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE and of conference abstracts published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials and expanded-access programmes (i.e. outside a clinical trial) of patients with melanoma assigned to vemurafenib treatment. Outcomes included prevalence of dermatological toxicities treated with vemurafenib. Statistical analyses were performed using the R2.8.1 meta package. RESULTS: In total, 11 studies comprising 4197 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For patients assigned to vemurafenib, the overall prevalence of all-grade cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) was 18.00% (95% CI 12.00-26.00%), rash 45.00% (95% CI 34.00-57.00%), photosensitivity reaction (PR) 30.00% (95% CI 23.00-38.00%), keratoacanthoma (KA) 10.00% (95% CI 6.00-15.00%) and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) 9.00% (95% CI 4.00-20.00%), while the prevalence of high-grade events was: cSCC 16.00% (95% CI 11.00-23.00%), rash 12.00% (95% CI 3.00-38.00%), PR 4% (95% CI 2.00-8.00%) and KA 6.00% (95% CI 5.00-7.00%). CONCLUSION: The most frequent dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma were cSCC, rash, PR and KA. These data may be useful for estimation of the efficacy and safety of the drug during clinical treatment and for reducing the prevalence of adverse reactions to vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma.

Severe vemurafenib-induced photosensitivity in a 6-year-old boy.

Vemurafenib, a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor, has been found to induce several cutaneous adverse effects, ranging from a keratosis pilaris-like reaction to squamous cell carcinoma. While photosensitivity has been well described as one of these manifestations, we report a case of a 6-year-old boy on vemurafenib who developed a severe blistering sunburn after only two 30-minute episodes of sun exposure. A brief review of other common cutaneous adverse effects of vemurafenib is also provided.

Drug and chemical induced photosensitivity from a clinical perspective.

Drug photosensitivity is a relatively common occurrence and a range of mechanisms may be involved. Some of these mechanisms will be discussed, including the most common, that of drug phototoxicity. Different types of photosensitivity are addressed with respect to clinical presentation, mechanisms and additionally the contribution to our understanding through clinically directed investigations and regulatory requirements. Repeated controlled therapeutic use of drug phototoxicity, with psoralen-UVA (PUVA) photochemotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) will also be discussed. Finally, the potential for drug-induced photocarcinogenesis will also be covered.