The utility of a multi-orifice epidural catheter when using the "Spray-as-You-Go" technique for topical Airway Anesthesia during Flexible Bronchoscopy, a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine administered through the working channel of a flexible bronchoscope can provide effective local anesthesia but cannot achieve good distribution in the airway. This study was undertaken to determine whether lidocaine delivered via a multi-orifice epidural catheter (three orifices/openings) is superior to conventional method and if a better distribution and decreased the cough reflex can be achieved. METHODS: The patients (N = 100; 50 in each group) were randomized to receive either topical airway anesthesia by the "spray-as-you-go" technique via conventional application (group C) through the working channel of the bronchoscope or via a triple-orifice epidural catheter (group E). The primary outcome measurement was the cough severity, which was documented using a 4-point scale. Bronchoscopists and nurses assessed the coughing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for cough, total consumption of propofol and lidocaine, requirement frequency of propofol and topical anesthesia, PACU retention time, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the median cough severity scores between the two groups (group C: 3 vs. group E: 2, P = 0.004). The median visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the cough, were significantly higher in group C than those in group E (bronchoscopist: 3 vs. 2 P = 0.002; nurse: 3 vs. 2, P < 0.001). The incidence of cough was significantly higher in group C in the trachea, left and right bronchi. The highest respiratory rate was higher in group C than in group E (P < 0.01). Eight patients in group C and two patients in group E had an oxygen saturation below 90% during flexible bronchoscopy(FB) (P = 0.046). More patients in group C required extra topical anesthesia than in group E (P < 0.001). The total lidocaine consumption was also higher in group C than that in group E (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endotracheal topical anesthesia via the multi-orifice epidural catheter (three holes/openings) during flexible bronchoscopy using the "spray-as-you-go" technique was appeared to be superior to the conventional method.

Protective effect of remote ischemic pre-conditioning on patients undergoing cardiac bypass valve replacement surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Remote ischemic pre-conditioning (RIPC) may have a protective effect on myocardial injury associated with cardiac bypass surgery (CPB). The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of RIPC on ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and to assess the underlying mechanisms. A total of 241 patients who underwent valve replacement were randomly assigned to receive either RIPC (n=121) or control group (n=120). The primary endpoint was peri-operative myocardial injury (PMI), which was determined by serum Highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hsTnT). The secondary endpoint was the blood gas indexes, acute lung injury and length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay and major adverse cardiovascular events. The results indicated that in comparison with control group, RIPC treatment reduced the levels of hsTnT at 6 and 24 h post-CPB (P<0.001), as well as the alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference and respiratory index after CPB. Furthermore, RIPC reduced the incidence of acute lung injury by 15.3% (54.1% in the control group vs. 41.3% in the RIPC group, P=0.053). It was indicated that RIPC provided myocardial and pulmonary protection during CPB. In addition, the length of the intensive care unit and hospital stay was reduced by RIPC. Mechanistic investigation revealed a reduced content of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, endothelin-1 and malondialdehyde, as well as elevated levels of nitric oxide in the RIPC group compared with those in the control group. This indicated that RIPC protected against I/R injury associated with CPB through reducing the inflammatory response and oxidative damage, as well as improving pulmonary vascular tension. In conclusion, RIPC reduced myocardial and pulmonary injury associated with CPB. This protective effect may be associated with the inhibition of the inflammatory response and oxidative injury. The present study proved the efficiency of this approach in reducing ischemia/reperfusion injury associated with cardiac surgery. Clinical trial registry no. ChiCTR1800015393.