Cardiac and Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Multiparametric MRI in Patients with Fontan Circulation.

The abnormal hemodynamics in Fontan circulation due to persistently increased systemic venous pressure results in hepatic venous congestion and Fontan-associated liver disease. Combined assessment of cardiac and liver fibrosis and cardiac remodeling using multiparametric MRI in this context have not been fully explored. To evaluate cardiac and liver fibrosis and cardiac remodeling using multiparametric MRI in patients who have undergone Fontan procedures. Thirty-eight patients and 23 controls underwent cardiac and liver MRI examinations in a 3.0-T scanner. Mann-Whitney, Fisher exact test, and Spearman's correlation were applied to evaluate myocardial volumes, function, native cardiac and liver T1 mapping, ECVs and liver stiffness. The mean native cardiac T1 value (p = 0.018), cardiac ECV (p < 0.001), liver native T1 (p < 0.001), liver ECV (p < 0.001), and liver stiffness (p < 0.001) were higher in patients than controls. The indexed end-diastolic volume (EDVi) correlated with the myocardial ECV (r = 0.356; p = 0.033), native liver T1 (r = 0.571; p < 0.001), and with liver stiffness (r = 0.391; p = 0.015). In addition, liver stiffness correlated with liver ECV (r = 0.361; p = 0.031) and native liver T1 (r = 0.458; p = 0.004). An association between cardiac remodeling and cardiac and liver fibrosis were found in this population. The usefulness of MRI to follow cardiac and liver involvement in these patients is critical to improve treatment strategies and to prevent the need for combined liver and heart transplantation.

Preperitoneal fat as a non-invasive marker of increased risk of severe non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fat distribution may have prognostic value in the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This study was conducted to evaluate associations of magnetic resonance imaging-measured abdominal fat areas with steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis, assessed histopathologically, in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This prospective study included 66 patients with type 2 diabetes (12 males, 54 females, age 26-68 years), without chronic liver disease of other causes. Axial dual-echo magnetic resonance images were acquired. Visceral, subcutaneous, and preperitoneal fat areas were measured using Osirix software. Liver biopsy specimens were obtained from all patients and examined histopathologically to evaluate steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis. Linear (for steatosis) and logistic (for steatohepatitis and fibrosis) regression models were fitted for the outcomes. R2 was used as a measure of how much model variance the predictors explained and to compare different predictors of the same outcome. RESULTS: Visceral and preperitoneal fat areas correlated well with histopathologically determined liver steatosis grade (both P = 0.004) and liver fibrosis (P = 0.008 and P = 0.037, respectively). All fat areas correlated well with steatohepatitis (P ≤ 0.002). Preperitoneal and visceral fat areas were the best predictors of steatohepatitis (R2 = 0.379) and fibrosis (R2 = 0.181), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral fat area was the best predictor of fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Preperitoneal fat area was the best predictor of steatohepatitis and is a potential new non-invasive marker for use in the screening of these patients to detect more aggressive forms of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

How Cardiac Fibrosis Assessed via T1 Mapping Is Associated with Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

(1) Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases worldwide. Although cardiovascular and NAFLD risk factors overlap, an independent association between these conditions may exist. Hepatic and cardiac fibrosis are important markers of mortality, but the correlation between these markers in patients with NAFLD has not been well studied. Our main objective was to determine the degree of myocardial fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and its correlation with the severity of liver fibrosis. (2) Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with NAFLD were allocated to two groups according to the stage of liver fibrosis assessed using MRI: no or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) and significant fibrosis (F2-F4). Framingham risk scores were calculated to evaluate cardiovascular risk factors, and patients underwent multiparametric cardiac and abdominal MRIs. (3) Results: The sample comprised 44 patients (28 with no or mild liver fibrosis and 16 with significant liver fibrosis). The mean age was 57.9 ± 12 years, and 41% were men. Most patients had high cardiac risk factors and carotid disease. Relative to patients with no or mild liver fibrosis, those with significant fibrosis had a higher median calcium score (p = 0.05) and increased myocardial extracellular volume (ECV; p = 0.02). Liver fibrosis correlated with cardiac fibrosis, represented by the ECV (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). The myocardial ECV differentiated patients with and without significant liver fibrosis (AUC = 0.78). (4) Conclusion: This study showed that diffuse myocardial fibrosis is associated with liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

Can gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging be used to avoid liver biopsy in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease?

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of liver disease worldwide. The diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the most severe form of NAFLD, is crucial and has prognostic and therapeutic implications. However, currently this diagnosis is based on liver biopsy and has several limitations. AIM: To evaluate the performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GA-MRI) in differentiating isolated steatosis from NASH in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: In this prospective study, 56 patients with NAFLD (18 with isolated steatosis and 38 with NASH) underwent GA-MRI. The contrast enhancement index (CEI) was calculated as the rate of increase of the liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio from before and 20 min after intravenous GA administration. Between-group differences in mean CEI were examined using Student's t test. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean CEI for all subjects was 1.82 ± 0.19. The mean CEI was significantly lower in patients with NASH than in those with isolated steatosis (P = 0.008). Two CEI cut-off points were used: < 1.66 (94% specificity) to characterize NASH and > 2.00 (89% sensitivity) to characterize isolated steatosis. CEI values between 1.66 and 2.00 indicated liver biopsy, and the procedure could be avoided in 40% of patients with NAFLD. CONCLUSION: GA-MRI is an effective noninvasive method that may be useful for the differentiation of NASH from isolated steatosis, and could help to avoid liver biopsy in patients with NAFLD.

Fat-containing liver lesions: a pictorial review.

The aim of this pictorial essay is to review the spectrum of fat-containing liver lesions and their characterisation on magnetic resonance imaging with focus on the radiological features that aid in the differential diagnoses. Fat-containing liver lesions comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours with variable imaging findings. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly displays the micro- and macroscopic fat components of the lesions and other characteristic features that are helpful tools to make the differential diagnosis.

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Assessment of Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis Compared with Liver Biopsy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capability of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess steatohepatitis and fibrosis determined by histopathology in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: Fifty-nine type 2 diabetic patients (49 women, 10 men; mean age, 54 ± 9 years) were submitted to liver biopsy for the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and underwent DWI on a 3.0T MR system using 10 b values. Institutional approval and patient consent were obtained. Pure molecular-based (D), perfusion-related (D*), and vascular fraction (f) were calculated using a double exponential model and least squares curve fitting. D, D*, and f were compared between patients with and without steatohepatitis and between patients with and without fibrosis. The variables were compared by using the Ranksum test and Student t-test. RESULTS: Steatohepatitis was observed in 22 patients and fibrosis in 16 patients. A lower D median (0.70 s/mm2 vs. 0.83 s/mm2, p<0.05) and a lower D* median (34.39 s/mm2 vs. 45.23 s/mm2, p<0.05) were observed among those with steatohepatitis. A lower D median (0.70 s/mm2 vs. 0.82 s/mm2, p<0.05) and a lower D* median (35.01 s/mm2 vs. 44.76 s/mm2, p=0.05) were also observed among those with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: IVIM-DWI has the potential to aid in the characterization of steatohepatitis and fibrosis.

Hepatobiliary contrast agents: differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions, pitfalls and other indications.

The characterization of focal liver lesions is very important. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the best imaging method for evaluating such lesions, but does not allow for the diagnosis in all cases. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents increases the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and reduces the number of non-specific liver lesions. The main indications for the method include: differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and adenoma; characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients; detection of small liver metastases; evaluation of biliary anatomy; and characterization of postoperative biliary fistulas. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents may reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and further investigations with other imaging methods, besides the need for imaging follow-up.

A caracterização das lesões hepáticas focais é muito importante. A ressonância magnética é considerada o melhor método de imagem para a avaliação destas lesões, mas não permite o diagnóstico em todos os casos. Os contrastes hepatobiliares aumentam a acurácia diagnóstica da ressonância magnética e diminuem o número de lesões hepáticas indefinidas. Suas principais indicações são a diferenciação entre hiperplasia nodular focal e adenoma, caracterização de carcinoma hepatocelular em pacientes cirróticos, detecção de metástases hepáticas pequenas, avaliação da anatomia biliar e identificação de fístulas biliares pós-operatórias. A utilização dos contrastes hepatobiliares pode reduzir a necessidade de procedimentos diagnósticos invasivos e de avaliação complementar por outros exames de imagem, além de diminuir a necessidade de exames de acompanhamento.

Is MR spectroscopy really the best MR-based method for the evaluation of fatty liver in diabetic patients in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the best Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based method when compared to gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis in diabetic patients in the clinical practice using liver biopsy as the reference standard, and to assess the influence of steatohepatitis and fibrosis on liver fat quantification. METHODS: Institutional approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective study. Seventy-three patients with type 2 diabetes (60 women and 13 men; mean age, 54 ± 9 years) underwent MRI and MRS at 3.0 T. The liver fat fraction was calculated from triple- and multi-echo gradient-echo sequences, and MRS data. Liver specimens were obtained in all patients. The accuracy for liver fat detection was estimated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the correlation between fat quantification by imaging and histolopathology was analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 92%. All gradient-echo MRI and MRS findings strongly correlated with biopsy findings (triple-echo, rho = 0.819; multi-echo, rho = 0.773; MRS, rho = 0.767). Areas under the ROC curves to detect mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 0.961, 0.975, and 0.962; multi-echo sequences, 0.878, 0.979, and 0.961; and MRS, 0.981, 0.980, and 0.954. The thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 4.09, 9.34, and 12.34, multi-echo sequences, 7.53, 11.75, and 15.08, and MRS, 1.71, 11.69, and 14.91. Quantification was not significantly influenced by steatohepatitis or fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver fat quantification by MR methods strongly correlates with histopathology. Due to the wide availability and easier post-processing, gradient-echo sequences may represent the best imaging method for the detection and quantification of liver fat fraction in diabetic patients in the clinical practice.

Fat-containing liver lesions: a pictorial review / Lesões hepáticas que contêm gordura: ensaio iconográfico

Abstract The aim of this pictorial essay is to review the spectrum of fat-containing liver lesions and their characterisation on magnetic resonance imaging with focus on the radiological features that aid in the differential diagnoses. Fat-containing liver lesions comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours with variable imaging findings. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly displays the micro- and macroscopic fat components of the lesions and other characteristic features that are helpful tools to make the differential diagnosis.

Resumo O objetivo deste ensaio é rever o espectro de lesões hepáticas que contêm gordura e caracterizar seus aspectos de imagem na ressonância magnética, com foco nas características radiológicas que auxiliam no diagnóstico diferencial. As lesões hepáticas que contêm gordura compreendem um grupo heterogêneo de tumores com aspectos de imagem variáveis. A ressonância magnética exibe claramente os componentes de gordura microscópica e macroscópica das lesões e outras características que são úteis para fazer diagnósticos diferenciais.

Contraste hepatobiliar: diagnóstico diferencial das lesões hepáticas focais, armadilhas e outras indicações / Hepatobiliary contrast agents: differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions, pitfalls and other indications

A caracterização das lesões hepáticas focais é muito importante. A ressonância magnética é considerada o melhor método de imagem para a avaliação destas lesões, mas não permite o diagnóstico em todos os casos. Os contrastes hepatobiliares aumentam a acurácia diagnóstica da ressonância magnética e diminuem o número de lesões hepáticas indefinidas. Suas principais indicações são a diferenciação entre hiperplasia nodular focal e adenoma, caracterização de carcinoma hepatocelular em pacientes cirróticos, detecção de metástases hepáticas pequenas, avaliação da anatomia biliar e identificação de fístulas biliares pós-operatórias. A utilização dos contrastes hepatobiliares pode reduzir a necessidade de procedimentos diagnósticos invasivos e de avaliação complementar por outros exames de imagem, além de diminuir a necessidade de exames de acompanhamento.

The characterization of focal liver lesions is very important. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the best imaging method for evaluating such lesions, but does not allow for the diagnosis in all cases. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents increases the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and reduces the number of non-specific liver lesions. The main indications for the method include: differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and adenoma; characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients; detection of small liver metastases; evaluation of biliary anatomy; and characterization of postoperative biliary fistulas. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents may reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and further investigations with other imaging methods, besides the need for imaging follow-up.