RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with Relapsed/Refractory Osteosarcoma (R/R OS) remains dismal without an agreement on systemic therapy. The use of High-Dose Ifosfamide (14 g/sqm) with an external pump in outpatient setting (14-IFO) in R/R OS patients is limited. This study represents the first retrospective cohort analysis focused on evaluating the activity and toxicity of 14-IFO in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study investigated 14-IFO activity, in terms of tumour response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, as well as survival rates and toxicity, according to CTCAE v.5. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 26 patients with R/R OS. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) obtained was 23% and 57.5%, respectively. Patients with relapsed OS showed a higher ORR (45%) and DCR (82%) compared to refractory patients, irrespective of the number of prior treatment lines received. The achievement of disease control with 14-IFO administration enabled 27% of patients to undergo new local treatment. Four-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 54% for all patients and 82% for the relapsed OS sub-group. Median Overall Survival (OSurv) was 13.7 months, with 1-year OSurv of 51% for all patients and 71% for relapsed patients. Age over 18 years and the presence of refractory disease were identified as negative prognostic factors for this patient cohort. A total of 101 cycles were evaluated for toxic assessment, demonstrating a tolerable profile without grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: 14-IFO should be considered a viable treatment option for R/R OS, particularly due to its well tolerated toxicity profile and the potential for home-administration, which can improve patient quality of life without compromising efficacy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Ifosfamida , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Osteossarcoma , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ifosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ifosfamida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Osteossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Osteossarcoma/mortalidade , Osteossarcoma/patologia , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Gradação de Tumores , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Originally established to evaluate the ethical aspects of clinical trials, Ethics Committees (ECs) are now requested to review different types of projects, including, among others, observational studies and disease registries. In Italy, clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and on medical devices are regulated by EU Regulation 536/2014, EU Regulation 2017/745, and 2017/746 while pharmacological observational studies are regulated by the Italian Medicines Agency guidelines of 2008 and by Ministerial Decree of November 30th, 2021. The other types of studies are not strictly regulated, causing discrepancies in their definition and assessment by the ECs, and slowdowns in the start of projects. The present contribution aims to propose definitions and distinctions between non-pharmacological observational studies and disease registries, which constitute different entities but are often assimilated by ECs, and to formulate suggestions for the evaluation of rare disease registries, which are an expanding research area of interest.
Assuntos
Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Doenças Raras , Sistema de Registros , Doenças Raras/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/ética , Itália , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/ética , União EuropeiaRESUMO
The consequences of the Italian privacy legislation, that represents a very restrictive implementation of the general European regulation on data protection, have mainly been felt at the level of observational research. In this field is not always possible to obtain the consent of subjects, and as for retrospective studies, it is not currently clear which is the correct regulatory procedure to follow. This uncertainty in the law's implementation has given way to multiple interpretations, making it difficult to obtain a homogeneous path in Italy. However, it is possible that the observation point has been totally wrong so far and that it would be more correct to choose a different legal bases than consent, both to preserve scientific progress and collective ethics, without losing the protection of the subject. This approach, which has already been followed by other European countries, could bring us closer to the rest of Europe and allow us to competitively participate in community projects that we are often cut off from.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Privacidade , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Europa (Continente) , ItáliaRESUMO
Children and adolescents affected by brain tumors are at risk for neuropsychological sequelae that need to be evaluated in order to plan adequate rehabilitation programs, and to support their development and recovery. This work aims to describe an innovative prospective observational study protocol for the early evaluation and monitoring over time of neuropsychological outcomes in this pediatric population. Pediatric patients aged 3-17 with a brain tumor diagnosis will be assessed through the use of a battery of Italian standardized neuropsychological tests, with good psychometric properties and age-appropiate, at three different time points of their clinical course: at diagnosis and before surgery (T0), after surgical removal and before the start of potential adjuvant therapies (T1), and at the one-year follow-up after potential adjuvant therapies (T2). This study will allow clinicians to support the neuropsychological development of these children by promoting appropriate and timely rehabilitation and educational programs from the early phases of their clinical course.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification redefines the concept of gray zone lymphoma (GZL), restricting it in practice to cases of mediastinal/thymic origin (mediastinal gray zone lymphoma, MGZL) with overlapping features between primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). Cases with histological characteristics of GZL but occurring without mediastinal involvement are better classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS), with few exceptions. PROCEDURE: We collected clinical and pathological data about all Italian pediatric patients diagnosed with GZL over a 20-year period. RESULTS: We identified only four cases of bona fide MGZL. All patients were adolescent and presented with a mediastinal disease, always associated with other nodal involvement. B symptoms and increased levels of both erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were observed. Only two patients achieved a first complete remission, suggesting a more aggressive clinical behavior than either PMBCL or CHL. CONCLUSION: Prospective studies evaluating prognostic factors and establishing the most effective first-line therapy for MGZL are highly needed.
RESUMO
Observational trials are crucial to assess the generalizability in the real world of evidence deriving from registration studies. Despite the unquestionable importance of this type of studies, Italian researchers have had to face many obstacles over the years, mainly due to ambiguous definitions and to a complex but at the same time incomplete legislation. The regulatory adjustments to the European Regulation 536/2014 have further complicated the operating and operational framework, making observational research a real "Cinderella" of the Italian system.
Assuntos
Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Itália , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In Europe, despite recent advances in clinical development, most of the drugs currently used to treat childhood cancers are adult medicines, prescribed outside of the authorized indication. In this context, a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, evaluating pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients affected by onco-hematologic disease, treated with targeted therapies used off-label or as compassionate use. METHODS: The analysis was conducted on 45 patients aged less than or equal to 30 years with cancer, having received at least one targeted therapy prescribed as off-label or compassionate use at a large Italian pediatric center between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2021. Data collected included information on the patient and tumor, data on off-label/compassionate treatment, and data on safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Total 25 out of 45 patients treated with off-label or compassionate targeted therapies were affected by onco-hematological diseases. Overall, 22 out of the 52 agents (42%) were prescribed in patients with relapsed neoplasm and 39% (20/52) in patients with refractory diseases. Complete response was observed in more than half (27/52) of treatments. At least one adverse reaction occurred in 76% (n = 22) of agents administered to patients with onco-hematological tumor and in 43% (n = 10) of agents prescribed to patients with solid tumor. CONCLUSION: This work aims to provide a snapshot of off-label and compassionate use prescriptions in a large Italian pediatric cancer center. This study confirms that targeted agents for unauthorized indications are often prescribed in pediatric patients with cancer, especially after disease relapse and that these treatments are mostly tolerable and effective.
Assuntos
Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Uso Off-Label , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , ItáliaRESUMO
Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are the backbone chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment; however, their use is associated with cardiotoxicity, which is underreported. In the present study, it was aimed to prospectively determine the incidence rates and related risk factors of FPinduced cardiotoxicity (FIC) in CRC patients and at identifying predictive biomarkers. A total of 129 consecutive previously untreated CRC patients underwent active cardiological monitoring, including 5items simplified questionnaire on symptoms, electrocardiogram (ECG) and plasma sample collection during FP chemotherapy. FIC was defined as the presence of ECG alterations and/or the arising of at least one symptom of chest pain, dyspnoea, palpitations or syncope. The primary objective was the evaluation of FIC incidence. Secondary objectives were the correlation of FIC with wellknown cardiological risk factors and the identification of circulating biomarkers (serum levels of troponin I, pro hormone BNP; miRNA analysis) as predictors of FIC. A total of 20 out of 129 (15.5%) patients experienced FIC. The most common symptoms were dyspnoea (60%) and chest pain (40%), while only 15% of patients presented ECG alterations, including one acute myocardial infarction. Retreatment with FP was attempted in 90% of patients with a favourable outcome. Despite 48% of patients having cardiological comorbidities, an increased FIC was not observed in this subgroup. Only the subgroup of females with the habit of alcohol consumption showed an increased risk of FIC. None of the circulating biomarkers evaluated demonstrated a clinical utility as FIC predictors. FIC can be an unexpected, lifethreatening adverse event that can limit the subsequent treatment choices in patients with CRC. In this prospective study, wellknown cardiological comorbidities were not related to higher FIC risk and circulating biomarkers predictive of toxicity could not be found. With careful monitoring, mainly based on symptoms, almost all patients completed the FP treatment.
Assuntos
Cardiotoxicidade , Neoplasias Colorretais , Feminino , Humanos , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor no Peito/induzido quimicamente , Dor no Peito/complicações , Dor no Peito/epidemiologia , Antimetabólitos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Biomarcadores , Dispneia/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the use of the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) in systematic reviews (SRs) adheres to RoB2 guidance. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library from 2019 to May 2021 to identify SRs using RoB2. We analyzed methods and results sections to see whether risk of bias was assessed at outcome measure level and applied to primary outcomes of the SR as per RoB2 guidance. The relation between SR characteristics and adequacy of RoB2 use was examined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred-eight SRs were included. We could assess adherence in 137 SRs as 12 declared using RoB2 but actually used RoB1 and 59 did not report the number of primary outcomes. The tool usage was adherent in 69.3% SRs. Considering SRs with multiple primary outcomes, adherence dropped to 28.8%. We found a positive association between RoB2 guidance adherence and the methodological quality of the reviews assessed by AMSTAR2 (p-for-trend 0.007). Multivariable regression analysis suggested journal impact factor [first quartile vs. other quartiles] was associated with RoB2 adherence (OR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Many SRs did not adhere to RoB2 guidance as they applied the tool at the study level rather than at the outcome measure level. Lack of adherence was more likely among low and very low quality reviews.
Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa , Relatório de Pesquisa , Humanos , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Viés , Estudos EpidemiológicosRESUMO
The European regulation 536/2014, unapplied for several years due to the inoperability of the European Portal, represented an epochal turning point in the legislation concerning pharmacological clinical trials. Although, unlike the directive, it could be directly applied without national transpositions, in Italy this has not been possible and for three months now we have been witnessing a haemorrhage of guidelines/operational proposals/decrees that to date do not make us ready to fully operate according to the new rules. Il regolamento europeo 536/20141, in vigore dal 16 giugno 2014 e rimasto per diversi anni non applicato per un ritardo nella messa in funzione del portale unico europeo, ha rappresentato una svolta epocale nella normativa inerente le sperimentazioni cliniche con farmaco. La normativa precedentemente in vigore2, infatti, pur rappresentando la prima trasformazione in legge delle Good Clinical Practices e un primo tentativo di armonizzazione tra le procedure regolatorie dei diversi stati membri, aveva portato a una serie di risvolti negativi, come un aumento vertiginoso dei costi e dei tempi necessari ad avviare uno studio. Tutto ciò, negli anni, si è tradotto in una deflessione delle richieste di autorizzazione delle sperimentazioni e in una grande difformità tra gli stati membri3,4. Il regolamento introduce delle novità mirate a ottimizzare profondamente l'iter regolatorio di approvazione delle sperimentazioni, primo fra tutti il nuovo processo di autorizzazione, che prevede l'espressione di un unico parere a livello europeo e la singola decisione, a livello di singolo stato membro, di accettare o non accettare tale decisione. Il nuovo processo, molto ambizioso da un punto di vista della riduzione dei tempi, doveva rappresentare una occasione storica per l'incremento delle performance di Paesi come l'Italia, da sempre penalizzata da una burocrazia molto complessa e dalla necessità di procedere con molteplici valutazioni da parte dell'autorità competente e di numerosi comitati etici5,6. I ritardi nella messa in funzione del portale, inizialmente prevista per maggio 2016, hanno portato a un lungo e continuo slittamento dei tempi di applicazione del regolamento, alla fine calendarizzata per il 31 gennaio 2022. Sei anni di attesa che, almeno sulla carta, hanno fornito l'occasione a tutti gli stati membri di prepararsi al meglio a tutti i cambiamenti che il regolamento avrebbe comportato.La scelta, da un punto di vista prettamente legale, di un regolamento piuttosto che di una nuova direttiva aveva lo scopo di evitare una ulteriore difformità di azione tra le diverse nazioni; il regolamento, infatti, a differenza della direttiva non necessita di successivi passaggi legislativi a livello nazionale e poteva essere direttamente implementato nei singoli stati membri. Alcune nazioni si sono preparate all'applicazione del regolamento procedendo con una profonda revisione e semplificazione del proprio apparato regolatorio; è il caso, per esempio, della Spagna, che ha optato per un unico decreto in grado di regolare tutti gli aspetti inerenti le sperimentazioni interventistiche con farmaco7.Situazione completamente opposta in Italia, dove l'implementazione della vecchia direttiva aveva causato una emorragia di decreti ministeriali e di altri atti legislativi che difficilmente potevano venire riorganizzati, come accaduto in Spagna, in un unico atto. Uno stato che ha portato, ancora una volta e forse in maniera ancora più complessa di quanto accaduto a inizio millennio, a un lungo processo di riorganizzazione legislativa, avviato con il decreto Lorenzin e ancora molto lontano dall'essere completato con tutti i decreti attuativi necessari.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , ItáliaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This is a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of an immune-sensitizing strategy with temozolomide priming followed by a combination of low-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-silenced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pretreated mCRC were centrally prescreened for MSS status and MGMT silencing (ie, lack of MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry plus MGMT methylation by pyrosequencing). Eligible patients received two priming cycles of oral temozolomide 150 mg/sqm once daily, days 1-5, once every 4 weeks (first treatment part) followed, in absence of progression, by its combination with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 8 weeks and nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (second treatment part). The primary end point was the 8-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate calculated from enrollment in patients who started the second treatment part, with ≥ 4 out of 27 subjects progression-free by the 8-month time point as decision rule. RESULTS: Among 716 prescreened patients, 204 (29%) were molecularly eligible and 135 started the first treatment part. Among these, 102 (76%) were discontinued because of death or disease progression on temozolomide priming, whereas 33 patients (24%) who achieved disease control started the second treatment part and represented the final study population. After a median follow-up of 23.1 months (interquartile range, 14.9-24.6 months), 8-month PFS rate was 36%. Median PFS and overall survival were 7.0 and 18.4 months, respectively, and overall response rate was 45%. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were skin rash (6%), colitis (3%), and hypophysitis (3%). No unexpected adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The MAYA study provided proof-of-concept that a sequence of temozolomide priming followed by a combination of low-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab may induce durable clinical benefit in MSS and MGMT-silenced mCRC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Humanos , Ipilimumab , Repetições de Microssatélites , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/genética , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is widely employed as point-of-care tests (POCT) for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. The accuracy of LFIA largely depends on the quality of the immunoreagents used. Typical LFIAs to reveal the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) employ anti-human immunoglobulin (hIG) antibodies and recombinant viral antigens, which usually are unstable and poorly soluble. Broad selective bacterial proteins, such as Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and Streptococcal protein G (SpG) can be considered alternatives to anti-hIG to increase versatility and sensitivity of serological LFIAs because of their high binding capacity, interspecies reactivity, and robustness. We developed two colorimetric LFA devices including SpA and SpG linked to gold nanoparticles (GNP) as detectors and explored the use of a specific, stable, and soluble immunodominant fraction of the nucleocapsid protein from SARS-CoV-2 as the capturing agent. The optimal amount of SpA-GNP and SpG-GNP conjugates and the protein-to-GNP ratios were defined through a full factorial experimental design to maximize the diagnostic sensitivity of the LFIAs. The new LFA devices were applied to analyze 105 human serum samples (69 positive and 36 negatives according to reference molecular diagnostic methods). The results showed higher sensitivity (89.9%, 95% CI 82.7-97.0) and selectivity (91.7%, 82.6-100) for the SpA-based compared to the SpG-based LFA. In addition, 18 serum samples from cats and dogs living with COVID-19 patients were analyzed and 14 showed detectable levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, thus illustrating the flexibility of the SpA- and SpG-based LFAs.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Nanopartículas Metálicas , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Gatos , Cães , Ouro/química , Imunoensaio/métodos , Nanopartículas Metálicas/química , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The burnout phenomenon has been extensively investigated among health care professionals, particularly focusing on physicians and nurses. However, literature concerning burnout in clinical research is poor and often neglects the other professional categories involved. METHODS: In March 2019, all members of Italian Group of Clinical Research Coordinator were invited to participate to a web survey, consisting of three sections: general information and workload; Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) test; subjective perception of oneself's work stress and possible causes. RESULTS: The majority of respondents felt a form of distress. The main source was contract type (31.2%), followed by workload (20.5%) and lack of skills recognition (17.8%). Results from MBI test confirmed the interviewees' subjective perception: an intermediate level of emotional exhaustion (19.1 points) and a very high sense of reduced professional achievement (26.8 points) were observed. Both depersonalization and sense of reduced professional achievement showed weak to moderate correlations with emotional exhaustion. Emotional exhaustion was associated with contract type with high significance. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to act on those qualitative factors that are greatly increasing the level of perceived stress, jeopardizing the quality of clinical research coordinators work and significantly amplifying the phenomenon of migration towards the private sector.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Médicos , Esgotamento Profissional/diagnóstico , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália , Inquéritos e Questionários , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
A rapid test for detecting total immunoglobulins directed towards the nucleocapsid protein (N) of severe acute syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) was developed, based on a multi-target lateral flow immunoassay comprising two test lines. Both test lines bound to several classes of immunoglobulins (G, M, and A). Specific anti-SARS immunoglobulins were revealed by a colorimetric probe formed by N and gold nanoparticles. Targeting the total antibodies response to infection enabled achieving 100% diagnostic specificity (95.75-100, C.I. 95%, n = 85 healthy and with other infections individuals) and 94.6% sensitivity (84.9-98.9, C.I. 95%, n = 62 SARS CoV-2 infected subjects) as early as 7 days post confirmation of positivity. Agreeing results with a reference serological ELISA were achieved, except for the earlier detection capability of the rapid test. Follow up of the three seroconverting patients endorsed the hypothesis of the random rise of the different immunoglobulins and strengthened the 'total antibodies' approach for the trustworthy detection of serological response to SARS CoV-2 infection.
Assuntos
Teste Sorológico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/imunologia , Imunoensaio/métodos , Adulto , Especificidade de Anticorpos , Colorimetria , Diagnóstico Precoce , Desenho de Equipamento , Ouro , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas/análise , Masculino , Nanopartículas Metálicas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nucleocapsídeo/química , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Background: New trends are emerging in clinical research, such as patient empowerment and an active role in influencing health and research ethics. Patients' involvement is considered pivotal by stakeholders and institutions because they can channel the voice of those they represent, empowering their starring role in the different research activities.Objectives: To obtain an overview of the real involvement of Italian patient associations in clinical research.Methods: In January 2019, the Working Group 'Clinical Research Coordinators' of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology spread an online questionnaire consisting of 16 questions on the active involvement of patient associations in clinical research.Results: The involvement in clinical research working groups, in the organization and implementation of specific activities and training initiatives is very limited (21.7% in both cases), as well as the active involvement in the conduct and/or definition of clinical trials (0.3%). Moreover, few associations (15.2%) have joined projects on patient involvement in clinical research in collaboration with other associations.Discussion: Although the current involvement of the associations may have been somewhat underestimated, there is no doubt that much more can be done in terms of training and identification of common objectives between patients and professionals.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Oncologia/organização & administração , Participação do Paciente , Sociedades/organização & administração , Humanos , Itália , Neoplasias/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has stressed the importance of health research as never before. In the specific domain of clinical research, the effort to rapidly find responses to health challenges and therapeutic hypotheses has highlighted the need for efficient, timely, ethically correct research. The guidelines published by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco have shown that some useful changes are feasible: simple and rapid methods have been implemented to conduct clinical research in the emergency conditions of the pandemic, maintaining high levels of quality. In this perspective, four Italian scientific associations operating in clinical research have worked together to evaluate which measures, among the ones implemented during the pandemic, have been particularly significant and potentially effective under normal conditions or in case of emergencies, and that therefore will be useful in the future as well.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Previsões , Humanos , Itália , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologiaRESUMO
The CoViD-19 pandemic has pointed out the the need for an efficient, timely, ethically correct clinical research, in order to find rapid and reliable responses to health challenges. The guidelines published by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco during the pandemic have shown that some useful changes for simplifying and speeding-up clinical research in Italy are feasible, while maintaining high levels of quality. In this perspective, a reflection is a must: perhaps we are ready to detach ourselves from that image of a slow and bureaucratic country now widespread in Europe. Perhaps the pandemic has left us something good. Maybe we are really able of working much better, even in non-emergency conditions.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Itália , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/terapiaRESUMO
Over the past few years, clinical research has developed considerably. To achieve adequate quality standards in its design and management, it was necessary to set up dedicated and qualified multi-professional teams, made up not only of medical personnel. This has led to the emergence of new professional roles, such as that of the research nurse (clinical research nurse, study nurse or clinical trial nurse). While in Europe this professional role is defined, in Italy it has started to assert itself only recently, with a profile linked mainly to practical rather than managerial tasks. The role is not yet recognized at institutional level and is not registered. The goal of our research was to understand how many research centers can rely on the presence of a research nurse in their staff and what was the research nurse's contribution to achieving the satisfaction of patients enrolled in clinical studies and on the work of the research team.