Defining Breast Cryoablation Treatment Success: A Guide for the Curative and Palliative Treatment of Breast Cancer.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Recent ICE3 trial of breast cryoablation for breast cancer demonstrated 98% success rate, similar to breast-conserving surgery. However, ICE3 and other published studies did not differentiate curative from palliative treatment nor define patient-specific treatment objectives. We sought to define treatment success of curative and palliative breast cryoablation for breast cancer in meeting procedure objectives and patient-specific treatment objectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who underwent breast cryoablation during 2021-2024. Breast radiologists performed outpatient cryoablation using local anesthesia and argon gas cryoprobes under ultrasound or MRI guidance. Patient demographics, referral indications, tumor characteristics, procedure details, and imaging follow-up findings were analyzed. Cryoablation was categorized as curative or palliative. Treatment success was defined as achievement of both procedure and patient-specific treatment objectives. RESULTS: Breast cryoablation was performed for 34 lesions in 29 patients with N0M0 (n = 25), N1M0 (n = 2), N2M0 (n = 1), and N0M1 (n = 1) disease. Most tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), low to intermediate grade, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive and HER2 negative (23 tumors, 68%). Tumor size ranged from 0.4-1.9 (median 0.8) cm for curative cryoablation and 0.6-6.0 (median 1.3) cm for palliative cryoablation. For 27 patients with follow-up imaging, ablation was curative in 14 patients, 14 tumors and palliative in 13 patients, 18 lesions. Imaging follow-up time ranged from 3 to 26 (median 16) months, > 12 months in 22 of 27 patients and 25 of 32 tumors. Complications were limited to 2 cases of skin frost injury, 1 mild and 1 moderate. Treatment success was achieved in 13 of 14 patients with curative and all 13 patients with palliative cryoablation. CONCLUSION: Our study defines treatment success for curative and palliative breast cryoablation, demonstrates breast cryoablation achieves not only procedure (technical) but also patient-specific treatment objectives without significant complications, and may serve as guide for integrating breast cryoablation in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Breast cryoablation for the palliative treatment of indolent subtype of multicentric triple-negative breast cancer.

Breast cryoablation for palliative and curative treatment of breast cancer has been performed for decades. Although there is a recent resurgence of interest in breast cryoablation with curative intent for unifocal, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, this report highlights the essential role that cryoablation can play in the palliative treatment of multicentric oestrogen and progesterone receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer, meeting the select pretreatment objectives such as breast or nipple pain relief and prevention of tumour erosion through the skin or nipple in patients who have failed or cannot tolerate the standard of care treatment.

Breast Cancer Cryoablation Fundamentals Past and Present: Technique Optimization and Imaging Pearls.

Surgical treatment for breast cancer has evolved from radical mastectomy to modified radical mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery. As the de-escalation of surgical treatment for breast cancer continues, nonsurgical treatment for early-stage breast cancer with favorable ancillary features (low grade, positivity for hormone receptors) is being explored. Of the nonsurgical treatment options, cryoablation has demonstrated the greatest appeal, proven to be effective, safe, well tolerated, and feasible in an outpatient setting with local anesthetic alone. Results of past and interim results of current trials of cryoablation of stage I low-grade breast cancer with curative intent are promising, with an overall clinical success rate of 98% and recurrence rates consistent with those expected following lumpectomy. Cryoablation is also an alternative palliative treatment for patients who cannot tolerate or who have disease that is refractory to or recurs after standard-of-care breast cancer treatment and may have immunological therapeutic effects, warranting future research. Understanding the indications and optimal technique for breast cancer cryoablation and understanding typical imaging findings after cryoablation are essential to ensure the success of the procedure in carefully selected patients.

Prospective Comparison of Synthesized Mammography with DBT and Full-Field Digital Mammography with DBT Uncovers Recall Disagreements That may Impact Cancer Detection.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis (SM+DBT) and full-field digital mammography with DBT were prospectively evaluated for recall rate (RR), cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value 1 (PPV1), lesion recall differences, and disagreements in recall for additional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 15, 2015 to January 15, 2017, after informed consent was obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant study, each enrolled patient's SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT were interpreted sequentially by one of eight radiologists. RR, CDR, PPV1, and imaging findings (asymmetry, focal asymmetry, mass, architectural distortion, and calcifications) recalled were reviewed. RESULTS: For SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT in 1022 patients, RR was 7.3% and 7.9% (SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: diff= -0.6%; 90% CI= -1.4%, 0.1%); CDR was 6.8 and 7.8 per 1000 (SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: diff= -1.0, 95% CI= -5.5, 2.8, p = 0.317); PPV1 was 9.3% and 9.9% (relative positive predictive value for SM+DBT vs. FFDM+DBT: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.73-1.22, p = 0.669). FFDM+DBT detected eight cancers; SM+DBT detected seven (missed 1 cancer with calcifications). SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT disagreed on patient recall for additional imaging in 19 patients, with majority (68%, 13/19 patients) in the recall of patients for calcifications. For calcifications, SM+DBT recalled six patients that FFDM+DBT did not recall, and FFDM+DBT recalled seven patients that SM+DBT did not recall, even though the total number of calcifications finding recalled was similar overall for both SM+DBT and FFDM+DBT. CONCLUSION: Disagreement in recall of patients for calcifications may impact cancer detection by SM+DBT, warranting further investigation.

The mammographic appearance of the BioMonitor implantable loop recorder.

The imaging appearance of implantable loop recorders (ILR's) have been described in literature (Steinberger and Margolies, 2017; Mayo and Leung, 2017; Tsau and Berger, 2004)1-3; however, the mammographic appearance of the BioMonitor ILR produced by BIOTRONIK has not been described. It is important for radiologists interpreting breast imaging to become familiar with the appearance of different implantable cardiac devices on mammograms in order to create accurate reports and adjust imaging protocols to improve imaging quality and lessen patient discomfort as needed.

Axillary ultrasound during neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of performing mid-treatment axillary ultrasound (AUS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who are undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) by determining the optimal cutoff number of abnormal nodes associated with residual nodal disease on surgical pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This sub-study, an interim analysis of an ongoing single-institution clinical trial enrolling patients with stage I-III TNBC, included 106 patients. Number of abnormal nodes at mid-treatment was assessed and recorded by experienced breast radiologists, who empirically categorized lymph nodes using a binary approach of sonographically-normal versus abnormal. Pathologic lymph node positivity was defined as presence of macrometastasis or micrometastasis in ≥1 axillary node from sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Of 106 patients, 26 (25 %) had residual nodal disease and 80 (75 %) had no nodal disease at surgery. Median number of abnormal nodes at mid-treatment was 5 (standard deviation [SD], 5) for patients with residual nodal disease and 0 (SD, 2) for patients with no nodal disease at surgery (p < 0.0001). TNBC patients with >4 abnormal nodes at mid-treatment had a significantly higher chance of being node-positive at surgery (AUC = 0.908, p < 0.0001; PPV = 90 %). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a cutoff of >4 abnormal nodes on mid-treatment AUS is associated with residual disease post-NAST. If our findings are substantiated by subsequent analyses, then mid-treatment AUS could be used to identify patients unlikely to achieve nodal pathologic complete response and who should be offered alternative therapy.

Malignancy rates of stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in women without known breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the malignancy rate in women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis at presentation who underwent stereotactic biopsies of distinct sites of suspicious calcifications. METHODS: This retrospective study included 280 women without a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis who underwent 587 stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in one or both breasts at our institution from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: The overall malignancy rate was 27.9% (78/280, 95% CI, 22.7%-33.5%) at the patient level and 18.7% (110/587, 95% CI, 15.7%-22.1%) at the lesion level. Eighteen had invasive cancers (mean [range] diameter, 0.5 cm [0.1-1.7]; six grade I, ten grade II, two grade III), one of whom had multifocal and another bilateral malignancy. Sixty had ductal carcinoma in situ. Of the 171 with all calcifications of the same morphology, 139 (81.3%) had all calcifications in the same pathology category (benign, high-risk, or malignant). CONCLUSION: The malignancy rate is substantial in women who undergo stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct calcification sites. Given the nearly 20% rate of dissimilar histopathology between calcification sites with similar morphology, if only one site is biopsied and results in a malignant pathology, biopsy of the additional calcifications is warranted. Even if the pathology result of the one site biopsy is benign, biopsy of additional sites may perhaps still be necessary.

Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status.

OBJECTIVE: Different molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have previously been identified through analysis of gene expression profiles. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype has been shown to have a lower rate of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than other TNBC subtypes. The purpose of this study was to determine if the imaging features of TNBCs differ by AR (androgen receptor) status, which is a surrogate immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for the chemoresistant LAR subtype of TNBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This sub-study was part of a clinical trial in patients with stage I-III TNBC who were prospectively monitored for response while receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) at a single comprehensive cancer center. This interim imaging analysis included 144 patients with known AR status measured by IHC. AR-positive (AR+) tumors were defined as those in which at least 10% of tumor cells had positive nuclear AR staining. Two experienced, fellowship-trained breast radiologists who were blinded to the IHC results retrospectively reviewed and reached consensus on all imaging studies for the index lesion (i.e., mammogram, ultrasound, and breast magnetic resonance imaging). The index lesion for each patient was reviewed and described according to the fifth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify imaging features predictive of AR status. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression models for AR status showed that AR+ TNBC was significantly associated with heterogeneously dense breast composition on mammography (p = 0.02), mass with calcifications (p = 0.05), irregular mass shape on mammography (p = 0.03), and irregular mass shape on sonography (p = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression models for AR status showed that AR+ TNBC was significantly associated with heterogeneously dense breast composition on mammography (p = 0.01), high mass density on mammography (p = 0.003), and irregular mass shape on sonography (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The imaging features of TNBCs differ by AR status. Multimodality breast imaging may help identify the LAR subtype of TNBC, which has been shown to be a subtype that is relatively resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

High risk breast lesions identified on MRI-guided vacuum-assisted needle biopsy: outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.

OBJECTIVE:: To determine whether breast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (MRI-VAB) high-risk lesion histology influences surgical or long-term imaging follow-up outcomes. METHODS:: Patients with imaging-concordant high-risk findings on 9-gauge breast MRI-VAB between January 2007 and July 2012 who had surgical histopathology or 2 year imaging follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS:: 90 patients with 99 lesions were included. Lesions were atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (n = 21), lobular neoplasia [n = 36; atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) (n = 22), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (n = 6), and ALH plus LCIS (n = 8)], and other high-risk lesion (n = 42; papillary lesions, radial scar, flat epithelial atypia, atypia unspecified). Of 53 excised lesions, 6 (11%) were upgraded to invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). 4 of 21 (19%) ADH lesions were upgraded to DCIS. 2 of 36 (6%) lobular neoplasia lesions, both combined ALH and LCIS, were upgraded to DCIS, and invasive lobular carcinoma, respectively. The remaining 46 lesions were managed conservatively with imaging follow-up: 17 (37%) had mammography only, while 29 (63%) had mammography and MRI follow-up. There was no evidence of breast cancer development at the site of MRI-VAB in the cases with only imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION:: We conclude that the upgrade rate for high-risk lesions at MRI-VAB at surgical excision is low. Surgical excision is warranted for ADH and combined ALH-LCIS lesions. For other lesions, a multidisciplinary approach to decide on personalized management may be appropriate. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Surgical excision is warranted for ADH lesions and combined ALH-LCIS lesions identified at breast MRI-VAB. A multidisciplinary approach to patient management of other high-risk lesions may be appropriate.

MR Imaging-Guided Breast Interventions: Indications, Key Principles, and Imaging-Pathology Correlation.

MR imaging is now routinely performed for breast cancer screening and staging. For suspicious MR imaging-detected lesions that are mammographically and sonographically occult, MR imaging-guided breast interventions, including biopsy, clip placement, and preoperative needle localization, have been developed to permit accurate tissue diagnosis and aid in surgical planning. These procedures are safe, accurate, and effective when performed according to key principles, including proper patient selection, use of appropriate technique, adequate preprocedure preparation and postprocedure patient care, and postprocedure imaging-pathology correlation. Imaging-pathology correlation after MR imaging-guided biopsy is essential to confirm accurate sampling and guide development of a comprehensive management plan.

Efficacy of telecytopathology for preliminary assessment of fine-needle aspirations performed at a remote facility.

INTRODUCTION: The need for real time anatomic pathology services has grown as healthcare systems, traditionally found at large medical centers, expand into smaller communities. The placement of a pathologist is not cost-, time-, or resource-efficient. Telecytopathology can provide rapid offsite evaluation of cytology tissues. This study evaluated the accuracy rate of rendered preliminary assessments for telecytopathology of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) for an offsite facility by comparing preliminary assessment results with the final diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pathology database was searched for telecytopathology US-guided FNAs with rapid offsite evaluation performed at a regional care center from August 2014 to June 2016. A total of 674 consecutive US-guided FNAs from 444 patients were obtained. FNA sites included lymph node (345 cases), breast (178 cases), thyroid gland (71 cases), and others (80 cases). RESULTS: Preliminary assessments of the 674 FNAs were adequate/benign in 275 (41%) cases, adequate/malignant in 182 (27%) cases, adequate/further review needed in 162 (24%) cases, indeterminate/borderline cellularity in 37 (5%) cases, and nondiagnostic in 18 (3%) cases. Final FNA diagnoses rendered included 391 (58%) negative for malignancy, 205 (30%) malignant, 34 (5%) atypical/suspicious for malignancy, 26 (4%) indeterminate cellularity-favor benign, and 18 (3%) nondiagnostic specimens. Concurrent core biopsy was performed in 42 cases and 83 cases were triaged for ancillary studies. The majority (99%) of US-guided FNAs demonstrated concordant preliminary assessments with the final diagnoses. A major discrepancy occurred in 1 case; 5 cases had minor discrepancies. CONCLUSIONS: Remote facility telecytopathology can be utilized as an accurate modality in guiding appropriate tissue acquisition and final diagnosis.

Analysis of stereotactic biopsies performed on suspicious calcifications identified within 24 months after completion of breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: Can biopsy be obviated?

BACKGROUND: To determine the cancer yield of stereotactic biopsy of suspicious calcifications identified within 24 months after breast conservation therapy (BCT). METHODS: Retrospective review of stereotactic biopsies performed during 2009-2013 for suspicious calcifications in the ipsilateral breast of patients who completed BCT. RESULTS: 94/2773 (3.4%) had stereotactic biopsies for suspicious calcifications in the ipsilateral breast; 7/94 (7.4%) had DCIS (6) or invasive (1) cancer; 5/7 occurred in the same breast quadrant as the primary. All 7 originally had negative surgical margins (≥2 mm); 6 received whole breast irradiation, and 2 received adjuvant chemotherapy + endocrine therapy. Median time to detection was 11 months (range, 6-20 months). There was a strong association between calcification morphology (particularly pleomorphic) and likelihood of malignancy (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic biopsy of calcifications identified within 24 months post-BCT has a 7% cancer yield. Tissue biopsy should be performed rather than imaging followup alone when breast calcifications have suspicious morphology.

Breast cancer neoplastic seeding in the setting of image-guided needle biopsies of the breast.

PURPOSE: To identify clinicopathologic, technical, and imaging features associated with neoplastic seeding (NS) following image-guided needle breast biopsy. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients presenting with a new diagnosis of breast cancer or suspicious breast findings requiring biopsy with subsequent diagnosis of NS. The time from biopsy to NS diagnosis was calculated. Histology, grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER2 status, T category, and N category were recorded. Biopsy guidance method, needle gauge, and number of passes were reviewed in addition to the mammographic and sonographic features of the primary tumors and the NS. RESULTS: Eight cases of NS were identified in 4010 patients. The mean time from biopsy to NS diagnosis was 60.8 days. The most frequent histology was invasive ductal carcinoma (7/8). Six cases were grade 3 (75.0%). Five primary breast cancers were ER, PR, and HER2 negative (62.5%). Seven patients underwent biopsy with ultrasound guidance. Multiple-insertion, non-coaxial ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy was done in 6 cases. Mammographic presentation of NS was focal asymmetry (3/7 cases), mass (1/7), calcifications only (1/7), or occult (2/7). Sonographic presentation of NS was most often a mass (7/8) with irregular shape (5/7) and without circumscribed margins (6/7) and was occult in 1 case (1/8). NS distribution was subdermal and intradermal. CONCLUSION: High-grade, triple-negative breast cancers and multiple-insertion, non-coaxial biopsies may be risk factors for NS. NS should be suspected on the basis of the superficial and linear pattern of disease progression in these patients.

Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: The follow-up of breast lesions with imaging-concordant benign histopathology results on MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is not currently standardized. We determined the false omission rate of breast MRI-guided VAB with benign histopathology (negative results) to assess whether breast MRI follow-up is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent 9-gauge breast MRI-guided VAB during 2007-2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Lesions with imaging-concordant benign histopathology results from MRI-guided VAB and surgery or 2 years or more of imaging follow-up were included. The false omission rate (1 - negative predictive value; [number of false-negative results / number of negative results]) of MRI-guided VAB was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine lesions were included, and 135 had only imaging follow-up (mammography follow-up: range, 17-107 months [median, 52 months]; MRI follow-up: range, 5-95 months [median, 35 months]). Of the 135 lesions with only imaging follow-up, 48 had mammography only (range, 26-86 months; median, 52 months), and 87 had mammography (range, 17-107 months; median, 52 months) and MRI (range, 5-95 months; median, 35 months). Thirty-four lesions had surgical correlation, and there were no cases of imaging-surgical discordance. Four malignancies were later diagnosed in the same breast in which MRI-guided VAB had been performed. One (0.6%) malignancy was invasive ductal carcinoma at 1 cm from the MRI-guided VAB site; it was mammographically detected 24 months after MRI-guided VAB. The other three malignancies developed 4 cm or more from the site of MRI-guided VAB: one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on mammography 12 months after MRI-guided VAB, one DCIS detected on MRI 24 months after MRI-guided VAB, and one Paget disease lesion detected at physical examination 32 months after MRI-guided VAB. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI-guided VAB has a low false omission rate. MRI follow-up of lesions with concordant benign MRI-guided VAB histopathology results may not be warranted.

Incremental Cancer Detection of Locoregional Restaging with Diagnostic Mammography Combined with Whole-Breast and Regional Nodal Ultrasound in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine if locoregional restaging with diagnostic mammography and ultrasound (US) of the whole breast and regional nodes performed for quality assurance in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were referred to a tertiary care center yields incremental cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective, single-institution database review was performed on the first 1000 women referred to our center in 2010 with a provisional breast cancer diagnosis. Locoregional restaging consisted of diagnostic full-field digital mammography combined with US of the whole breast and regional nodal basins. Bilateral whole-breast US was performed in women with contralateral mammographic abnormality or had heterogeneously or extremely dense parenchyma. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Final analyses included 401 women. Of the 401 women, 138 (34%) did not have their outside images available for review upon referral. The median age was 54 years (range 21-92); the median tumor size was 2.9 cm (range 0.6-18.0) for women whose disease was upstaged and 2.2 cm (range 0.4-15.0) for women whose disease was not upstaged. Incremental cancer detection rates were 15.5% (62 of 401) in the ipsilateral breast and 3.9% (6 of 154) in the contralateral breast (P < 0.0001). The total upstage rate was 25% (100 of 401). Surgical management changed from segmentectomy to mastectomy in 12% (50 of 401). The re-excision rate after segmentectomy was 19% (35 of 189). CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional restaging with diagnostic mammography combined with whole-breast and regional nodal US that is performed for standardization of the imaging workup for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients can reduce underestimation of disease burden and impact therapeutic planning.

Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 1,112 patients who underwent US-guided breast CNB with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles. Cases with surgical excision or a minimum of 2 years of imaging follow-up were included. Rates of sample inadequacy, discordance with surgical or imaging findings and upgrade of DCIS to invasive cancer or high-risk lesion to in situ or invasive cancer were computed for each needle size. RESULTS: The study included 703 CNBs: 203 performed with 14-gauge, 235 with 16-gauge and 265 with 18-gauge needles. There were no significant differences between 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles in rates of specimen inadequacy (0 %, 0.4 % and 1.9 %, respectively) (p = 0.084); surgical discordance (2.6 %, 2.9 % and 3.8 %) (p = 0.76); imaging discordance (0 %, 0 % and 2 %) (p = 1.0); DCIS upgrade (43 %, 43 % and 36 %) (p = 1.00) or high-risk lesion upgrade (38 %, 25 % and 55 %) (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of US-guided CNB of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles. KEY POINTS: • Percutaneous image-guided breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is the standard of care. • Breast CNB with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles has similar diagnostic accuracy. • Smaller gauge needles can be confidently used for ultrasound-guided breast CNB.