Performance of thoracic ultrasonography compared with chest radiography for the detection of rib fractures using computed tomography as a reference standard.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is growing evidence that ultrasonography is superior to X-ray for rib fractures' detection, X-ray is still indicated as the most appropriate method. This has partially been attributed to a lack of studies using an appropriate reference modality. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and X-ray in the detection of rib fractures, considering CT as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a 2.5-year period, all consecutive patients with clinically suspected rib fracture(s) following blunt chest trauma and available posteroanterior/anteroposterior X-ray and thoracic CT were prospectively studied and planned to undergo thoracic ultrasonography, by a single operator. All imaging examinations were evaluated for cortical rib fracture(s), and their location was recorded. The cartilaginous rib portions were not assessed. CTs and X-rays were evaluated retrospectively. Concomitant thoracic/extra-thoracic injuries were assessed on CT. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (32 males, 27 females; mean age, 53.1 ± 16.6 years) were included. CT, ultrasonography, and X-ray (40 posteroanterior/19 anteroposterior views) diagnosed 136/122/42 rib fractures in 56/54/27 patients, respectively. Ultrasonography and X-ray had sensitivity of 100%/40% and specificity of 89.7%/30.9% for rib fractures' detection. Ultrasound accuracy was 94.9% compared to 35.4% for X-rays (P < .001) in detecting individual rib fractures. Most fractures involved the 4th-9th ribs. Upper rib fractures were most commonly overlooked on ultrasonography. Thoracic cage/spine fractures and haemothorax represented the most common concomitant injuries. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography appeared to be superior to X-ray for the detection of rib fractures with regard to a reference CT.

Developing a Radiomics Atlas Dataset of normal Abdominal and Pelvic computed Tomography (RADAPT).

Atlases of normal genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have been published in an attempt to understand the biological phenotype in health and disease and to set the basis of comprehensive comparative omics studies. No such atlas exists for radiomics data. The purpose of this study was to systematically create a radiomics dataset of normal abdominal and pelvic radiomics that can be used for model development and validation. Young adults without any previously known disease, aged > 17 and ≤ 36 years old, were retrospectively included. All patients had undergone CT scanning for emergency indications. In case abnormal findings were identified, the relevant anatomical structures were excluded. Deep learning was used to automatically segment the majority of visible anatomical structures with the TotalSegmentator model as applied in 3DSlicer. Radiomics features including first order, texture, wavelet, and Laplacian of Gaussian transformed features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A Github repository was created to host the resulting dataset. Radiomics data were extracted from a total of 531 patients with a mean age of 26.8 ± 5.19 years, including 250 female and 281 male patients. A maximum of 53 anatomical structures were segmented and used for subsequent radiomics data extraction. Radiomics features were derived from a total of 526 non-contrast and 400 contrast-enhanced (portal venous) series. The dataset is publicly available for model development and validation purposes.

Convolutional neural networks for the differentiation between benign and malignant renal tumors with a multicenter international computed tomography dataset.

OBJECTIVES: To use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the differentiation between benign and malignant renal tumors using contrast-enhanced CT images of a multi-institutional, multi-vendor, and multicenter CT dataset. METHODS: A total of 264 histologically confirmed renal tumors were included, from US and Swedish centers. Images were augmented and divided randomly 70%:30% for algorithm training and testing. Three CNNs (InceptionV3, Inception-ResNetV2, VGG-16) were pretrained with transfer learning and fine-tuned with our dataset to distinguish between malignant and benign tumors. The ensemble consensus decision of the three networks was also recorded. Performance of each network was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and their area under the curve (AUC-ROC). Saliency maps were created to demonstrate the attention of the highest performing CNN. RESULTS: Inception-ResNetV2 achieved the highest AUC of 0.918 (95% CI 0.873-0.963), whereas VGG-16 achieved an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI 0.752-0.874). InceptionV3 and ensemble achieved the same performance with an AUC of 0.894 (95% CI 0.844-0.943). Saliency maps indicated that Inception-ResNetV2 decisions are based on the characteristics of the tumor while in most tumors considering the characteristics of the interface between the tumor and the surrounding renal parenchyma. CONCLUSION: Deep learning based on a diverse multicenter international dataset can enable accurate differentiation between benign and malignant renal tumors. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Convolutional neural networks trained on a diverse CT dataset can accurately differentiate between benign and malignant renal tumors. KEY POINTS: • Differentiation between benign and malignant tumors based on CT is extremely challenging. • Inception-ResNetV2 trained on a diverse dataset achieved excellent differentiation between tumor types. • Deep learning can be used to distinguish between benign and malignant renal tumors.

Generative adversarial networks for spine imaging: A critical review of current applications.

PURPOSE: In recent years, the field of medical imaging has witnessed remarkable advancements, with innovative technologies which revolutionized the visualization and analysis of the human spine. Among the groundbreaking developments in medical imaging, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have emerged as a transformative tool, offering unprecedented possibilities in enhancing spinal imaging techniques and diagnostic outcomes. This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of GANs in spinal imaging, and to emphasize their potential to improve the diagnosis and treatment of spine-related disorders. A specific review focusing on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in the context of medical spine imaging is needed to provide a comprehensive and specialized analysis of the unique challenges, applications, and advancements within this specific domain, which might not be fully addressed in broader reviews covering GANs in general medical imaging. Such a review can offer insights into the tailored solutions and innovations that GANs bring to the field of spinal medical imaging. METHODS: An extensive literature search from 2017 until July 2023, was conducted using the most important search engines and identified studies that used GANs in spinal imaging. RESULTS: The implementations include generating fat suppressed T2-weighted (fsT2W) images from T1 and T2-weighted sequences, to reduce scan time. The generated images had a significantly better image quality than true fsT2W images and could improve diagnostic accuracy for certain pathologies. GANs were also utilized in generating virtual thin-slice images of intervertebral spaces, creating digital twins of human vertebrae, and predicting fracture response. Lastly, they could be applied to convert CT to MRI images, with the potential to generate near-MR images from CT without MRI. CONCLUSIONS: GANs have promising applications in personalized medicine, image augmentation, and improved diagnostic accuracy. However, limitations such as small databases and misalignment in CT-MRI pairs, must be considered.