Guess Who's Coming to Clinic? Companions in a Pediatric Urology Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding who accompanies children to clinic visits is necessary to engage stakeholders and tailor communication and educational materials. We undertook this study to describe the clinical companions for new patients in a general pediatric urology clinic. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included all new urology patients aged less than 18 y at a single freestanding quaternary care children's hospital in selected months of 2019 and 2022. Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnosis, level of community disadvantage, and companion present. The number and identities of companions of patients living in more and less disadvantaged neighborhoods were compared. RESULTS: Of 1940 patients, 1014 (52%) were accompanied by mothers alone, 266 (14%) by fathers alone, and 580 (30%) by both mother and father. Mothers were at 85% of clinical visits and fathers at 45% of visits. The likelihood of having one versus two parents present was similar in more and less disadvantaged areas (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.55, P = 0.53). When one parent was present, the odds of being accompanied by the mother was lower for patients living in Area Deprivation Index 1-2 (less disadvantaged areas; OR = 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.62, P = 0.0001), and for the father to accompany children aged 12 y and more than infants (OR = 2.16, P = 0.0005) if there was only one parent present. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight opportunities to engage nonmaternal caregivers in pediatric urologic care, to further explore parental decisions around appointment attendance, and to optimize how clinical information is delivered to caregivers who are and are not present during appointments.

Putting the coach in the game: Current and future state of surgical coaching in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND: Surgical coaching has been proposed as a mechanism to fill gaps in proficiency and encourage continued growth following formal surgical training. Coaching benefits have been demonstrated in other surgical fields; however, have not been evaluated within pediatric urology. The aims of this study were to survey members of The Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) to assess the current understanding and utilization of surgical coaching while gauging interest, potential barriers and personal goals for participation in a coaching program. METHODS: Following IRB approval, members of the SPU were invited to electronically complete an anonymous survey which assessed 4 domains: 1) understanding of surgical coaching principles, 2) current utilization, 3) interest and potential barriers to participation, and 4) personal surgical goals. To evaluate understanding, questions with predefined correct answers on the key principles of coaching were posed either in multiple choice or True/False format to the SPU membership. RESULTS: Of the 674 pediatric urologists invited, 146 completed the survey (22%). Of those, 46% correctly responded the definition of surgical coaching. Coaching utilization was reported in 27% of respondents currently or having previously participated in a surgical coaching program. Despite current participation rates, only 6 surgeons (4%) have completed training in surgical coaching, despite 79% expressing interest to participate in a surgical coaching program. The most influential barrier to participating in a coaching program was time commitment. Respondents largely prioritized technical and cognitive skill improvement as their primary goals for coaching (see figure below). CONCLUSIONS: While interest in surgical coaching is high among pediatric urologists, the principles of surgical coaching were not universally understood. Furthermore, formal coach training is markedly deficient, representing a gap in our profession and an opportunity for significant avenues for improvement, especially for technical and cognitive skills. Development of a coaching model based on these results would best suit the needs of pediatric urologists providing that the time commitment barrier for these endeavors can be mitigated and/or reconciled.

Standardization and Implementation of a Surgical Coaching Model for Pediatric Urology.

To bridge gaps in proficiency and encourage life-long learning following training, coaching models have been utilized in multiple surgical fields; however, not within pediatric urology. In this review of our methodology, we describe the development of a coaching model at a single institution. In our initial experience, the perceived most beneficial aspect of the program was the goal setting process with logistics around debriefs being the most challenging. With our proposed coaching study, we aim to develop a model based upon prior coaching frameworks,1,2 that is feasible and universally adaptable to allow for further advancement of surgical coaching, particularly within the field of pediatric urology.

Association between YouTube® videos and health literacy with postoperative healthcare utilization following pediatric urologic surgery: A randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Limited caregiver health literacy has been associated with poorer health outcomes in pediatric patients and may limit caregiver understanding of printed education resources. Postoperative healthcare utilization may be related to confusion about instructions or complications. OBJECTIVE: To correlate caregiver health literacy and educational video intervention with postoperative healthcare utilization following ambulatory pediatric urologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From July through December 2021, a randomized double-blinded trial assessed postoperative healthcare utilization following pediatric urologic surgery. Caregivers were randomized to receive standardized postoperative counseling and printed instructions (control) or access to English-language educational YouTube® videos with standardized postoperative counseling and printed instructions (intervention). Medical record abstraction was completed 30 days following surgery to identify postoperative healthcare utilization with calls, messages, add-on clinic visits, or presentation for urgent or emergent care, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Target enrollment was achieved with 400 caregivers with 204 in the intervention and 196 in the control groups. There was a 32.5 % overall rate of postoperative healthcare utilization. Health literacy was inversely associated with total postoperative healthcare utilization (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative healthcare utilization between the control and intervention groups (p = 0.623). However, on sub-analysis of caregivers with postoperative healthcare utilization (Summary Figure), there were fewer total occurrences in the intervention group (intervention median 1, IQR 1,2.3; control median 2, IQR 1,3; p < 0.001). For caregivers with limited health literacy, there was a greater associated reduction in median calls from 2 (IQR 0,2) to 0 (IQR 0,0.5) with video intervention (p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, total postoperative healthcare utilization was significantly associated with limited caregiver health literacy (OR 1.08; p = 0.004), English as preferred language (OR 0.68; p = 0.018), and older patient age (OR 0.95; p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Current resources for postoperative education are limited as resources can be written above recommended reading levels and families can have difficulty recalling information discussed during postoperative counseling. Video intervention is an underutilized resource that can provide an additional resource to families with visual and auditory aids and be accessed as needed. CONCLUSION: Caregiver health literacy was inversely associated with postoperative healthcare utilization. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative healthcare utilization with video intervention. However, on subgroup analysis, supplemental videos were associated with fewer occurrences of postoperative healthcare utilization, especially in caregivers with limited health literacy. On multivariate regression, health literacy, preferred language, and patient age were significantly associated with total postoperative healthcare utilization.

Utility of Postoperative Phone Calls in Reducing Unplanned Health Care Utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative phone calls ideally proactively identify concerns. This study aimed to determine whether postoperative phone calls after elective outpatient pediatric urology surgery were associated with differences in postoperative healthcare utilization. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients undergoing elective outpatient pediatric urologic surgery in selected months of 2019-2021. Data were abstracted on patient demographics, postoperative call completion, number and timing of parent-initiated calls within 30 d, concerns for parent-initiated calls, and timing and indication for emergency department visits within 30 d. Patients with and without completed postoperative calls were compared. RESULTS: Of 1494 patients, 416 (38.6%) had completed postoperative phone calls; 1078 (61.4%) did not. Calls were more likely to be completed in more disadvantaged areas (Area Deprivation Index deciles 9-10; odds ratio [OR] = 3.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.70-5.54, P < 0.0001). Overall, the proportions of patients seeking emergency care within 30 d (3.6% versus 4.0%, OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.49-1.64, P = 0.73) and with parent-initiated phone calls (31.7% versus 31.3%, OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.80-1.20, P = 0.86) were similar in patients with and without postop calls completed. For children in less disadvantaged areas (Area Deprivation Index decile 1-2), the likelihood of a parent-initiated call was higher when postop calls were completed (47.8% versus 33.6%, OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.15-2.79, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Routine postoperative phone calls within 72 h of outpatient pediatric urologic surgery are not associated with decreased overall postoperative health care utilization, and in some cases are associated with an increase in calls to clinic. Defining patient and provider expectations for postoperative contact may make postoperative calls more useful.

A Surprise During "Routine" Orchidopexy: An Extrarenal Wilms Tumor Case Report.

We present the case of a 12-month-old male diagnosed with an extrarenal Wilms tumor found incidentally at the time of inguinal orchiopexy. He was staged and treated according to Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol, with no evidence for disease at the end of treatment. We review the patient's presentation and treatment course, followed by a review of current literature on extrarenal Wilms tumor and considerations for management.

Comparing Telemedicine and In-Person Clinical Evaluations for Pediatric Urology Concerns.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine may promote equitable health care delivery, particularly in rural and underserved regions. While patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine appear to be high, it remains unclear if telemedicine accomplishes the same clinical goals as in-person clinic visits. We undertook this study to compare the differences in history-taking, physical examination, and recommended follow-up in new pediatric urology patients seen via telemedicine and in-person. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed by retrospectively reviewing the charts of all new patients visiting the general pediatric urology clinic at a single freestanding children's hospital in January and April of three consecutive years (2019, 2020, 2021). Data were abstracted on patient demographics, comprehensiveness of history of present illness, completeness of physical examination, and recommended follow-up. Patients seen by telemedicine and in-person were compared. RESULTS: Of 1354 patients, 1244 (91.9%) had in-person and 110 (8.1%) telemedicine visits. Telemedicine patients had a median of 4 history of present illness components recorded; in-person patients had 3 (P < 0.0001). Patients seen in-person had a more comprehensive physical examination recorded compared with telemedicine patients (median 12 vs 2 systems, P < 0.0001). Significantly fewer telemedicine patients were discharged from clinic after the initial visit (2.7% vs 16.5%), and significantly more were asked to return for additional evaluation (39.1% vs 23.2, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial pediatric urology telemedicine consultations gathered more historical and fewer physical examination components and were more likely to require an additional clinic visit for evaluation. Goals of care should be considered when selecting a visit modality.

Just Get in Line: Rural-Urban Differences in Access to Pediatric Renal-Bladder Ultrasounds.

INTRODUCTION: Health-care disparities in rural and underserved areas may be exacerbated by the pandemic, personnel challenges, and supply chain limitations. This study aimed to quantify current variation in rural and urban pediatric renal ultrasound availability. METHODS: We identified all hospitals statewide and contacted radiology departments posing as a parent trying to schedule an appointment for a routine pediatric renal-bladder ultrasound. Intervals between day of contact and first available appointment were compared between rural and urban institutions. RESULTS: We were able to contact 42/48 (87.5%) rural hospitals, and 20/39 (51.3%) urban hospitals. Scheduling could not be completed in 5 rural and 7 urban hospitals. The median wait time for the 37 remaining rural and 13 remaining urban hospitals was similar: 7 (range: 0-21) days in rural hospitals and 6 (range: 0-17) days in urban hospitals (P = 0.81). If contact was made, the likelihood of scheduling within 7 d was similar in rural and urban areas (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-1.97; P = 0.18). However, patients were much more likely to have a completed call at a rural hospital (OR = 6.65; 95% CI: 2.3-19.2; P = 0.0005), and so in reality, patients were 2.89 times as likely to be able to schedule an renal-bladder ultrasound within 7 d at a rural compared with an urban institution (95% CI: 1.19-7.03; P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: While access to pediatric renal sonograms was similar within a week at rural and urban institutions once telephone contact was made, it was significantly more difficult to schedule appointments at urban institutions.

Critical elements of radical nephroureterectomy for pediatric unilateral renal tumor.

Children with renal masses require surgical management to provide accurate surgical staging and skilled resection of the tumor. This document includes evidence-based recommendations for pediatric surgeons regarding the resection, staging, and proper nodal basin evaluation.

Reducing post-operative caregiver after-hours phone calls to pediatric urology providers: A quality improvement study.

INTRODUCTION: Caregiver phone calls are an important part of caring for pediatric patients. At our institution, residents respond to after-hours caregiver calls. While it is critical for families to be able to reach us for urgent concerns, the ease of access has led to overutilization with many phone calls not meeting the urgent nature that is intended for these calls. The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease the number of non-urgent caregiver calls after-hours. Our secondary aim was to improve compliance with telephone encounter documentation and to standardize the documentation content. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single institution, multiphase quality improvement project. This started with a preintervention phase which included evaluation of our current state, identifying that most calls were for post-operative patients and that our discharge instructions inadequately detailed when caregivers should call. Notes were also inconsistently documented with no standard format. In the first PDSA cycle, launched on November 1, 2021, a standardized note template was created for documentation of caregiver telephone encounters. The PDSA cycle began on January 1, 2022 and included updates to our post-operative instructions with explicit guidance detailing when to call after-hours. Call data from September 2021 to February 2022 was reviewed including variables such as caller demographics, reason for call, and operative details. Primary outcomes were proportion of post-operative calls within 30 days and non-urgent calls. Secondary outcome was proportion of calls documented appropriately. Phases were categorized as current state (Sep/Oct 2021), PDSA cycle 1 (Nov/Dec 2021), PDSA cycle 2 (Jan/Feb 2022). RESULTS: In our current state, the majority of the calls (66%) were for post-operative patients and 59% of all calls during this period were non-urgent. The proportion of post-operative phone calls stayed stable at 67% during PDSA cycle 1, but decreased to 38% with PDSA cycle 2 with implementation of updated post-operative instructions (Summary figure) (p < 0.001). The proportion of non-urgent calls was similar (current state - 68%, PDSA cycle 1 - 72%, PDSA cycle 2-73%, p = 0.39) (Summary figure). Call documentation was also similar with a documentation rate of 79% pre-intervention and 87% post-intervention (p = 0.21) (Summary figure). CONCLUSIONS: With interventions focused on post-operative caregiver instructions, the number of post-operative phone calls decreased. Standardization of documentation was achieved. However, the overall call volume did not change, nor the proportion of non-urgent calls.

Assessment and Management of Inguinal Hernias in Children.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in children. However, a number of controversial issues, such as optimal timing and approach to repair, continue to be debated. This publication reviews the available data pertaining to these controversial issues and identifies best practices in management of inguinal hernias in children.