Human movement strategies in uncertain environments: A synergy-based approach to the stability-agility tradeoff.

Humans frequently prepare for agile movements by decreasing stability. This facilitates transitions between movements but increases vulnerability to external disruptions. Therefore, humans might weigh the risk of disruption against the gain in agility and scale their stability to the likelihood of having to perform an agility-demanding action. We used the theory of motor synergies to investigate how humans manage this stability-agility tradeoff under uncertainty. This theory has long quantified stability using the synergy index, and reduction in stability before movement transitions using anticipatory synergy adjustment (ASA). However, the impact of uncertainty - whether a quick action should be executed or inhibited - on ASA is unknown. Furthermore, the impact of ASA on execution and inhibition of the action is unclear. We combined multi-finger, isometric force production with the go/no-go paradigm. Thirty participants performed constant force (no-go task), rapid force pulse (go task), and randomized go and no-go trials (go/no-go task) in response to visual cues. We measured the pre-cue finger forces and computed ASA using the uncontrolled manifold method and quantified the spatio-temporal features of the force after the visual cue. We expected ASA in both go/no-go and go tasks, but larger ASA for the latter. Surprisingly, we observed ASA only for the go task. For the go/no-go task, 53% of participants increased stability before the cue. The high stability hindered performance, leading to increased errors in no-go trials and lower peak forces in go trials. These results align with the stability-agility tradeoff. It is puzzling why some participants increased stability even though 80% of the trials demanded agility. This study indicates that individual differences in the effect of task uncertainty and motor inhibition on ASA is unexplored in motor synergy theory and presents a method for further development.

Risky behavior during stair descent for young adults: Differences in men versus women.

Injuries commonly occur on stairs, with high injury rates in young adults, especially young women. High injury rates could result from physiological and/or behavioral differences; this study focuses on behaviors. The purposes of this observational study were (1) to quantify young adult behaviors during stair descent and (2) to identify differences in stair descent behavior for young adult men versus women. Young adult pedestrians (N = 2,400, 1,470 men and 930 women) were videotaped during descent of two indoor campus staircases, a short staircase (2 steps) and a long staircase (17 steps). Behaviors during stair descent were coded by experimenters. Risky behaviors observed on the short staircase included: No one used the handrail, 16.1% used an electronic device, and 16.4% had in-person conversations. On the long staircase: 64.8% of pedestrians did not use the handrail, 11.9% used an electronic device, and 14.5% had in-person conversations. Risky behaviors observed more in women included: less likely to use the handrail (long staircase), more likely to carry an item in their hands (both staircases), more likely to engage in conversation (both staircases), and more likely to wear sandals or heels (both staircases) (p≤0.05). Protective behaviors observed more in women included: less likely to skip steps (both staircases), and more likely to look at treads during transition steps (long staircase) (p≤0.05). The number of co-occurring risky behaviors was higher in women: 1.9 vs 2.3, for men vs women, respectively (p<0.001). Five pedestrians lost balance but did not fall; four of these pedestrians lost balance on the top step and all five had their gaze diverted from the steps at the time balance was lost. The observed behaviors may be related to the high injury rate of stair-related falls in young adults, and young women specifically.

Expectation of volitional arm movement has prolonged effects on the grip force exerted on a pinched object.

Humans closely coordinate the grip force exerted on a hand-held object with changes in the load arising from the object's dynamics. Recent work suggests the grip force is responsive to the predictability of the load forces as well. The well-known grip-force-load-force coupling is intermittent when the load arising from volitional movements fluctuates predictably, whereas grip force increases when loads are unpredictable. Here, we studied the influence of expected but uncertain volitional movements on the digit forces during a static grasp. Young, healthy participants used a pinch grasp to hold an instrumented object and track visual targets by moving the object. We quantified the mean grip force, the temporal decline in grip force (slacking), and the coupling between the pressing digit forces that yield the grip force during static prehension with no expectation of movement, and during the static phase of a choice reaction time task, when the participant expected to move the object after a variable duration. Simply expecting to move the object led to sustained (for at least 5 s) higher magnitude and lower slacking in the grip force, and weaker coupling between the pressing digit forces. These effects were modulated by the direction of the expected movement and the object's mass. The changes helped to maintain the safety margin for the current grasp and likely facilitated the transition from static to dynamic object manipulation. Influence of expected actions on the current grasp may have implications for manual dexterity and its well-known loss with age.

The coordination between digit forces is altered by anticipated changes in prehensile movement patterns.

Stability is the ability of a system to maintain a desired static or dynamic motor pattern. Maneuverability, on the other hand, is the ability to transition between motor patterns, and it is antagonistic to stability. Animals frequently reduce the stability of an ongoing task to facilitate anticipated movement transitions. Such stability-maneuverability tradeoffs are observed in human locomotion. However, the notion applies to other behaviors and this paper reports the first study on the stability-maneuverability tradeoff in human prehension. We tested if the coordination between the digit forces during the manipulation of a hand-held object is altered in response to an expected change in the manipulation pattern. We focused on the coupling between the grip and the load force and between the opposing forces exerted by the thumb and the four fingers, and on the transition from rhythmic vertical oscillation to non-vertical oscillation of the object. The nature of these couplings depends on the oscillation direction. Therefore, the stability-maneuverability tradeoff predicts that an expected volitional change to the object's movement will diminish the strength of these couplings so that the force patterns generating the current movement can efficiently transition into new ones that generate the new movement. The strength of the grip-load coupling did not alter in tasks that required a change in movement compared to tasks that did not. We speculate that participants preferred safety over maneuverability and maintained the grip-load coupling strength to counter high inertial loads and avoid object slip. In contrast, the strength of the coupling between the thumb and the four fingers' opposing forces reduced in tasks that required a change in movement compared to tasks that did not. Thus, the stability-reduction aspect of the stability-maneuverability tradeoff occurs in prehensile behavior. Future work should focus on associating the reduction in stability with gains in maneuverability, and on developing a comprehensive account of this tradeoff in prehensile tasks.