Clofazimine as a substitute for rifampicin improves efficacy of Mycobacterium avium pulmonary disease treatment in the hollow-fiber model.

Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease is treated with an azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampicin regimen, with limited efficacy. The role of rifampicin is controversial due to inactivity, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of clofazimine as a substitute for rifampicin in an intracellular hollow-fiber infection model. THP-1 cells, which are monocytes isolated from peripheral blood from an acute monocytic leukemia patient, were infected with M. avium ATCC 700898 and exposed to a regimen of azithromycin and ethambutol with either rifampicin or clofazimine. Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampicin were simulated. For clofazimine, a steady-state average concentration was targeted. Drug concentrations and bacterial densities were monitored over 21 days. Exposures to azithromycin and ethambutol were 20%-40% lower than targeted but within clinically observed ranges. Clofazimine exposures were 1.7 times higher than targeted. Until day 7, both regimens were able to maintain stasis. Thereafter, regrowth was observed for the rifampicin-containing regimen, while the clofazimine-containing regimen yielded a 2 Log10 colony forming unit (CFU) per mL decrease in bacterial load. The clofazimine regimen also successfully suppressed the emergence of macrolide tolerance. In summary, substitution of rifampicin with clofazimine in the hollow-fiber model improved the antimycobacterial activity of the regimen. Clofazimine-containing regimens merit investigation in clinical trials.

The role of rifampicin within the treatment of Mycobacterium avium pulmonary disease.

Rifampicin is recommended for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease alongside azithromycin and ethambutol. We evaluated the azithromycin-ethambutol backbone with and without rifampicin in an intracellular hollow fiber model and performed RNA sequencing to study the differences in adaptation. In an in vitro hollow fiber experiment, we simulated epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetic profiles of the recommended 3-drug (rifampicin, ethambutol, and azithromycin) or a 2-drug (ethambutol and azithromycin) treatment. THP-1 cells infected with M. avium ATCC700898 were exposed to these regimens for 21 days. We determined intra- and extra-cellular bacterial load- and THP-1 cell densities on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21, alongside RNA sequencing. The emergence of macrolide resistance was studied by inoculating intra- and extra-cellular fractions of azithromycin-containing Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were determined at days 0 and 21. Both therapies maintained stasis of both intra- and extra-cellular bacterial populations for 3 days, whilst regrowth coinciding with the emergence of a macrolide-resistant subpopulation was seen after 7 days. THP-1 cell density remained static. Similar transcriptional profiles were observed for both therapies that were minimally influenced by exposure duration. Transcriptional response was slightly larger during 2-drug treatment. Rifampicin did not add to the antimycobacterial effect to the 2-drug therapy or suppression of emergence resistance. RNA transcription was not greatly altered by the addition of rifampicin, which may be due to strong transcriptional influence of azithromycin and host cells. This questions the role of rifampicin in the currently recommended therapy. These findings should be confirmed in clinical trials.

New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.

Although tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable, the lengthy treatment (generally 6 months), poor patient adherence, high inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), emergence of drug resistance, presence of comorbidities, and adverse drug reactions complicate TB therapy and drive the need for new drugs and/or regimens. Hence, new compounds are being developed, available drugs are repurposed, and the dosing of existing drugs is optimized, resulting in the largest drug development portfolio in TB history. This review highlights a selection of clinically available drug candidates that could be part of future TB regimens, including bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid, linezolid, clofazimine, optimized (high dose) rifampicin, rifapentine, and para-aminosalicylic acid. The review covers drug development history, preclinical data, PK, and current clinical development.

An Integral Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Plasma and Urine in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although dose optimization studies have been performed for piperacillin and tazobactam separately, a combined integral analysis is not yet reported. As piperacillin and tazobactam pharmacokinetics are likely to show correlation, a combined pharmacokinetic model should be preferred to account for this correlation when predicting the exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics and evaluate different dosing regimens of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill patients using an integral population pharmacokinetic model in plasma and urine. METHODS: In this observational study, a total of 39 adult intensive care unit patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam as part of routine clinical care were included. Piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations in plasma and urine were measured and analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to predict the concentrations for different dosing strategies and different categories of renal function. RESULTS: A combined two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model for both piperacillin and tazobactam was developed, with an output compartment for the renally excreted fraction. The addition of 24-h urine creatinine clearance significantly improved the model fit. A dose of 12/1.5 g/24 h as a continuous infusion is sufficient to reach a tazobactam concentration above the target (2.89 mg/L) and a piperacillin concentration above the target of 100% f T>1×MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤ 16 mg/L). To reach a target of 100% f T>5×MIC with an MIC of 16 mg/L, piperacillin doses of up to 20 g/24 h are inadequate. Potential toxic piperacillin levels were reached in 19.6% and 47.8% of the population with a dose of 12 g/24 h and 20 g/24 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A regular dose of 12/1.5 g/24 h is sufficient in > 90% of the critically ill population to treat infections caused by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with MICs ≤ 8 mg/L. In case of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an MIC of 16 mg/L, there is a fine line between therapeutic and toxic exposure. Dosing guided by renal function and therapeutic drug monitoring could enhance target attainment in such cases. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03738683.

Standard therapy of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease shows limited efficacy in an open source hollow fibre system that simulates human plasma and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVES: Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) bacteria can cause chronic pulmonary disease (PD). Current treatment regimens of azithromycin, ethambutol and rifampicin have culture conversion rates of around 65%. Dynamic, preclinical models to assess the efficacy of treatment regimens are important to guide clinical trial development. The hollow fibre system (HFS) has been applied but reports lack experimental details. METHODS: We simulated the human pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, ethambutol and rifampicin both in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in a HFS, exposing THP-1 cells infected with M. avium to the triple-drug regimen for 3 weeks. We accounted for drug-drug interactions and protein-binding and provide all laboratory protocols. We differentiated the effects on the intracellular and extracellular mycobacterial population. RESULTS: The antibiotic concentrations in the HFS accurately reflected the time to peak concentration (Tmax), the peak concentration (Cmax) and half-life of azithromycin, rifampicin and ethambutol in plasma and ELF reported in literature. We find that plasma drug concentrations fail to hold the MAC bacterial load static (ΔLog10 CFU/mLControl:Regimen = 0.66 ± 0.76 and 0.45 ± 0.28 at 3 and 21 days); ELF concentrations do hold the bacterial load static for 3 days and inhibit bacterial growth for the duration of the experiment (ΔLog10 CFU/mLControl:Regimen = 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.64 ± 0.59 at 3 and 21 days). DISCUSSION: In our model, the current therapy against MAC is ineffective, even when accounting for antibiotic accumulation at the site of infection and intracellularly. New treatment regimens need to be developed and be compared with currently recommended regimens in dynamic models prior to clinical evaluation. With the publication of all protocols we aim to open this technology to new users.

The role of amikacin in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease.

Introduction: Guidelines recommend the use of amikacin in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease. The authors have evaluated the evidence for the position of amikacin in NTM disease treatment.Areas covered: The authors performed a literature search for original research on amikacin in NTM disease, including its mechanism of action, emergence of resistance, pre-clinical and clinical investigations.Expert opinion: Amikacin shows moderate in vitro activity against the clinically most relevant NTM species (M. avium complex and M. abscessus). It is synergistic with ethambutol, clofazimine, and macrolides and these combinations are effective in animal models. Liposomal encapsulation increases amikacin efficacy. Clinically, the recommended dose of 15 mg/kg intravenous amikacin does not lead to PK/PD target attainment in all patients and a positive impact on long-term treatment outcomes remains unproven in both M. avium complex and M. abscessus disease. Adding the amikacin liposome inhalation suspension did prove to be effective in short and long term in patients not responding to recommended treatment for M. avium complex pulmonary disease. Its optimal use in M. avium complex and M. abscessus pulmonary disease warrants further evaluation.