Report From the Field: Public Health Equity Through Innovative Multisector Data Sharing.

CONTEXT: Data sharing across sectors for the purpose of driving health equity is a particularly innovative yet emerging concept in public health practice and research, although the extent to which public health entities engage in multisector data sharing and initiatives is currently underexplored. This practice report examines the nature and extent to which public health entities are sharing data across sectors in ways that are innovative and supportive of their organizational missions to promote community health equity and well-being. PROGRAM: As a program office of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Data Across Sectors for Health (DASH) seeks to promote and support data sharing systems leveraged toward equitable improvements to health. IMPLEMENTATION: We pilot tested, revised, and disseminated the 2021 All In National Inventory, a survey implemented to scan the environment to track progress and challenges in the field of data sharing, and feed lessons learned back into communities to cultivate further public health innovations involving shared data and infrastructure development. EVALUATION: Use case development, engaging communities to cocreate shared data systems. DISCUSSION: Findings show public health plays a pivotal role in innovation to share data across sectors to serve as a community health improvement foundation. While public health often leads these initiatives to improve health and promote health equity, national data suggest there is much room for improvement in incorporating equitable data sharing practice.

Learning Collaborative Events With Child Welfare and Health Care Providers Improve Systems Knowledge and Intent to Change.

INTRODUCTION: Children in foster care are at higher risk of health problems. These risks present challenges to achieving permanency, safety, and well-being. Despite efforts to improve the systems serving children in foster care, gaps remain in achieving timely and quality health services. Based on stakeholder reports that health care provider knowledge about child welfare systems is a barrier to care, the Fostering Health Partnerships project conducted 2-session learning collaborative events across Michigan. The project team hypothesized that participants would increase knowledge of child welfare policy and that physician participants would identify and commit to practice change to improve health care services to children in foster care. METHODS: Learning collaborative events included an in-person session followed by a live webinar session. Participants included child welfare professionals, physicians, and other health care representatives. Participants completed surveys assessing knowledge about child welfare health policy. Physician participants completed a post-event interview. The investigators used pre- and post-intervention survey design and qualitative evaluation of physician interview data to assess the impact of the learning collaborative events on knowledge and practice. RESULTS: A total of 781 individuals attended the initial session and 383 attended the second session of 36 events for 80 counties in Michigan. 247 individuals completed pre- and post-event surveys and 7 physicians completed interviews after the events. Survey data showed that event participants demonstrated increased knowledge of child welfare policy related to health (P < .001). Interviewed physicians reported making practice changes to improve health care services and indicated that the events were valuable though time intensive. CONCLUSION: An abbreviated learning collaborative process is an effective tool to improve knowledge and drive practice change. Future efforts will build on this project to improve access, coordination, and quality health services for children in foster care.

Multipayer primary care transformation: impact for Medicaid managed care beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT), a statewide multipayer patient-centered medical home (PCMH) demonstration in 2012-2015, on cost, utilization, and quality among Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. STUDY DESIGN: Observational longitudinal study with comparison groups. METHODS: Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses compared changes in outcomes among beneficiaries whose primary care providers participated in MiPCT, non-MiPCT PCMH, and non-PCMH practices. Net cost savings were derived. RESULTS: The study included 173,179 MiPCT, 209,181 non-MiPCT PCMH, and 148,657 non-PCMH beneficiaries. Against 1 or both comparison groups relative to 2011, MiPCT adults had significant reductions in cost, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization risk in 2015. Against both comparison groups, MiPCT high-risk adults showed significant cost reduction in 2014-2015, ED reduction in 2015, and reduced hospitalization risk in 2013-2015. For children, no significant relative change in cost occurred, but both ED and hospitalization risk were reduced in 2015. In 2013-2015, cumulative net cost savings were $15,569,526 (95% CI, $3,416,832-$27,722,219) (return on investment [ROI], $3.60) for adults and $23,998,180 (95% CI, $11,782,031-$36,214,347) (ROI, $10.69) for high-risk adults, and a cost increase of $16,517,948 (95% CI, $7,712,286-$25,323,609) (ROI, -$1.30) for children. Quality metrics were significantly higher in MiPCT in most years, although most DID estimates were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of cost savings exists among MiPCT Medicaid managed care adults; it was driven by high-risk adults, who also had reduced hospitalization risk. For children, no cost reductions occurred, but hospital and ED utilization were reduced in 2015. MiPCT maintained equal or higher quality of care but did not show consistent improvement.

Patient Experience with the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Michigan's Statewide Multi-Payer Demonstration: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The literature on patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and patient experience is somewhat mixed. Government and private payers are promoting multi-payer PCMH initiatives to align requirements and resources and to enhance practice transformation outcomes. To this end, the multipayer Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) demonstration project was carried out. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the PCMH is associated with a better patient experience, and whether a mature, multi-payer PCMH demonstration is associated with even further improvement in the patient experience. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional comparison of adults attributed to MiPCT PCMH, non-participating PCMH, and non-PCMH practices, statistically controlling for potential confounders, and conducted among both general and high-risk patient samples. PARTICIPANTS: Responses came from 3893 patients in the general population and 4605 in the high-risk population (response rates of 31.8% and 34.1%, respectively). MAIN MEASURES: The Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, with PCMH supplemental questions, was administered in January and February 2015. KEY RESULTS: MiPCT general and high-risk patients reported a significantly better experience than non-PCMH patients in most domains. Adjusted mean differences were as follows: access (0.35**, 0.36***), communication (0.19*, 0.18*), and coordination (0.33**, 0.35***), respectively (on a 10-point scale, with significance indicated by: *= p<0.05, **= p<0.01, and ***= p<0.001). Adjusted mean differences in overall provider ratings were not significant. Global odds ratios were significant for the domains of self-management support (1.38**, 1.41***) and comprehensiveness (1.67***, 1.61***). Non-participating PCMH ratings fell between MiPCT and non-PCMH across all domains and populations, sometimes attaining statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: PCMH practices have more positive patient experiences across domains characteristic of advanced primary care. A mature multi-payer model has the strongest, most consistent association with a better patient experience, pointing to the need to provide consistent expectations, resources, and time for practice transformation. Our results held for a general population and a high-risk population which has much more contact with the healthcare system.

Physician and Staff Acceptance of Care Managers in Primary Care Offices.

INTRODUCTION: Embedded care managers are increasingly implemented as part of the care team within primary care practices, yet previous studies have indicated variability in acceptance by physicians and staff. This study assesses the acceptability of care managers among staff and physicians within the Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) demonstration. METHODS: Care manager acceptance was measured using a web-based survey distributed to practices participating in the MiPCT demonstration. RESULTS: Both physicians and staff reported high levels of care manager acceptance. Longer length of care manager employment at the practice, higher care manager FTE dedicated to care management, and care manager employed by practice were all significantly associated with care manager acceptance. DISCUSSION: The MiPCT demonstration found high care manager acceptance across all care team members. The high level of acceptance may be due to the structures and processes developed by MiPCT to support implementation of care managers and the length of the intervention period. CONCLUSION: The MiPCT demonstration confirms that following three years of implementation, embedded care managers are acceptable to both physicians and staff within primary care practices. Importantly, embeddedness, or the amount of time care managers are located within practices, is associated with increased acceptance.

Medication safety after implementation of a commercial electronic health record system in five safety-net practices: a mixed methods approach.

PURPOSE: This study, conducted in five safety-net practices, including two nurse-managed health centers (NMHCs) and three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examined the impact of implementing a commercial electronic health records (EHRs) system on medication safety. DATA SOURCE: A mixed methods approach with two sources of data were used: (a) a query of prescription records captured by the EHR retrieving co-prescribed medications with identified drug-drug interaction (DDI) risks, and (b) semistructured interviews with clinicians and leadership about the usability and benefits of EHR-embedded clinical decision support in the form of DDI alerts. CONCLUSIONS: We found an exceptionally low rate of DDI pairs in all five practices. Only 130 "true" DDI pairs were confirmed representing 149,087 visits and 62 providers. Among the 130, the largest categories were related to antihypertensive medications, which are in fact often prescribed together. There were no significant differences between physicians and nurse practitioners on the rate of DDI pairs nor between NMHCs and FQHCs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementation of an EHR in these five safety-net settings had a positive impact on medication safety. The issue of missing end dates is noteworthy in terms of DDIs and unnecessary alerts that could lead to alert fatigue.

Use of a comprehensive patient safety tool in primary care practices.

PURPOSE: To present a tool that can be used to evaluate patient safety in both nurse-led and physician-led practices. DATA SOURCE: This article describes our experience with the Physician Practice Patient Safety Assessment (PPPSA) tool in six safety net practices-three of which were primary care nurse-managed health centers and three were physician-led federally qualified health centers. The information provided is from the tool itself and how it might be used in clinical settings, especially primary care. CONCLUSIONS: The PPPSA is a tool to measure the extent to which patient safety practices are rigorously and systematically implemented throughout a health center. The tool's methodology requires discussion and consensus, incorporating a team approach with multiple perspectives within a center. It is designed to promote changes in practices that would improve patient safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The tool has enormous relevance for primary care settings, especially those preparing themselves for patient-centered medical home status and meaningful use. But most important, it has relevance as we create healthcare environments that promote patient safety and a practice culture that is truly patient centered.

Comparison of nurse managed health centers with federally qualified health centers as safety net providers.

Nurse Managed Health Centers (NMHCs) provide a critical safety net function in their communities, yet they often remain invisible and challenged in terms of financial sustainability. This paper presents a comparison of demographics and financial status of NMHCs and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The comparison is based on four years of annual NMHC national survey data that includes 42 NMHCs overall and the 2008 FQHC data in the Uniform Data System. Findings indicate that NMHCs and FQHCs serve very similar diverse populations yet funding and revenue differences were significant. NMHCs tend to rely more on grants and donations from the private sector as well as contracts while FQHCs have access to considerable federal support that is cost based when serving the underserved. In addition, NMHCs are challenged by the array of state, federal and third party insurers' regulations that often disadvantage nurse practitioners as primary care providers.

A partnership model for implementing electronic health records in resource-limited primary care settings: experiences from two nurse-managed health centers.

OBJECTIVE: To present a partnership-based and community-oriented approach designed to ease provider anxiety and facilitate the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) in resource-limited primary care settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The approach, referred to as partnership model, was developed and iteratively refined through the research team's previous work on implementing health information technology (HIT) in over 30 safety net practices. This paper uses two case studies to illustrate how the model was applied to help two nurse-managed health centers (NMHC), a particularly vulnerable primary care setting, implement EHR and get prepared to meet the meaningful use criteria. RESULTS: The strong focus of the model on continuous quality improvement led to eventual implementation success at both sites, despite difficulties encountered during the initial stages of the project. DISCUSSION: There has been a lack of research, particularly in resource-limited primary care settings, on strategies for abating provider anxiety and preparing them to manage complex changes associated with EHR uptake. The partnership model described in this paper may provide useful insights into the work shepherded by HIT regional extension centers dedicated to supporting resource-limited communities disproportionally affected by EHR adoption barriers. CONCLUSION: NMHC, similar to other primary care settings, are often poorly resourced, understaffed, and lack the necessary expertise to deploy EHR and integrate its use into their day-to-day practice. This study demonstrates that implementation of EHR, a prerequisite to meaningful use, can be successfully achieved in this setting, and partnership efforts extending far beyond the initial software deployment stage may be the key.

Quality of care in nurse-managed health centers.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this article are to: (a) describe the first, national, collection of quality measures for nurse-managed health centers (NMHCs); (b) present the quality findings; (c) compare findings with national ambulatory care benchmarks; and (d) discuss the feasibility of national quality data collection, including NMHCs' experiences with data submission and the utilization of findings. METHODS: Quality outcomes appropriate for aggregated assessment of NMHC quality were proposed by a committee of the National Institute for Nursing Centers. Quality measures related to these outcomes were developed for breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, diabetes care, hypertension management, and smoking cessation based on protocols of the Health care Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Nine NMHCs were recruited to participate in retrospective data collection, manually from record audits or electronically from the submission of data files. RESULTS: Overall, quality measure findings compared favorably with national benchmarks, with particularly high quality demonstrated for chronic disease care management. CONCLUSIONS: Good to very good quality of care was documented across NMHCs, and NMHCs compared favorably with national benchmarks. Data were useful to NMHCs in identifying quality strengths and areas for improvement. National data collection proved to be feasible.

Toward a national nurse-managed health center data set: findings and lessons learned over 3 years.

Although primary care nurse-managed health centers (NMHCs) have gained increasing recognition, there are limited standardized clinical and financial data on these centers. The purpose of this paper is to present the process, benefits, and challenges in collecting standardized national data based on a consensus process from NMHCs over 3 consecutive years. The Institute for Nursing Centers (INC) NMHC Survey focuses on demographic, clinical, and financial data. A detailed codebook accompanied the INC NMHC Survey. A total of 42 NMHCs responded in at least 1 of the 3 years. Despite the challenges in collecting some of the data, especially for the first survey year, data quality improved remarkably when the INC NMHC Survey was repeated. Financial data seemed to be more easily reported than demographic or clinical data. NMHCs increase access to care, often for vulnerable populations, yet to date there are limited standardized clinical and financial data on these centers. The INC NHMC Survey and data described in this paper begins to address that gap.

CPT coding patterns at nurse-managed health centers: data from a national survey.

Nurse-managed health centers (NMHCs) play an important role in delivering health care services to a wide range of communities and often serve as our nation's safety net providers. Unfortunately, NMHCs struggle to remain in business for a variety of reasons, including underdeveloped business practices. Until now, NMHCs had only data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Medical Group Management Assocation for comparison with coding patterns in individual centers. This article is the first published report of national data for NMHCs that is available for comparison. Providers need to possess financial acumen to remain open for business. Assessment of CPT coding patterns is a key strategy to support long-term sustainability.

Baseline predictors of fatigue 1 year after mild head injury.

OBJECTIVE: To compare reports of fatigue 12 months after minor trauma by participants with mild head injury (MHI) with those with other injury, and identify injury and baseline predictors of fatigue. DESIGN: An inception cohort study of participants with MHI and other nonhead injuries recruited from and interviewed at the emergency department (ED), with a follow-up telephone interview at 12 months. SETTING: Level II community hospital ED. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n=58) with MHI and loss of consciousness (LOC) of 30 minutes or less and/or posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) less than 24 hours, 173 with MHI but no PTA/LOC, and 128 with other mild nonhead injuries. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age 18 years or older, within 24 hours of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or higher, and discharge from the ED. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Vitality subscale. RESULTS: Significant predictors of fatigue severity at 12 months were baseline fatigue, having seen a counselor for a mental health issue, medical disability, marital status, and in some stage of litigation. Injury type was not a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue severity 12 months after injury is associated with baseline characteristics and not MHI. Clinicians should be cautious about attributing persisting fatigue to MHI without comprehensive consideration of other possible etiologic factors.

Satisfaction with a school-based teen health center: a report card on care.

Evaluations of the quality of School-Based Health Center (SBHC) care, both satisfaction and outcomes, have been developed by several state SBHC initiatives. However, few of these patient satisfaction surveys have been rigorously evaluated. An adolescent patient satisfaction based on a grading rubric familiar to the adolescents was developed and used to assess care at a nurse-managed teen health center. Satisfaction data on 190 encounters were collected in one SBHC using a report card rubric. The adolescent patients represented grades 6th through 8th, and were almost equally distributed between girls (55.9%) and boys (44.1%). This SBHC was a part of a university consortium of nurse-managed centers. Results demonstrated high satisfaction (approximately 3.7 out of 4) with care using a reliable tool (a = .84) designed for adolescents, which incorporated a grading rubric for the evaluation criteria. The nurse practitioner received high marks for listening to the students and treating the students with respect. Yet, statistical differences by grade level were found. The satisfaction tool was found to be reliable (alpha = .84) and consistent with adolescent's perspectives on satisfaction with health care. The study is the first published report that specifically examined student satisfaction with care in a nurse-managed SBHC. Overall satisfaction with care received high "grades" from both first time and repeat users, and from boys and girls.

Clients served and services provided by academic nurse-managed centers.

Currently, no national database for academic nurse-managed centers (ANMCs) exists. These primary care services remain somewhat invisible in the policy and reimbursement areas of the American primary care system and, consequently, are undersupported. The purpose of this article is to describe client and service data from a national study of ANMCs. A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from ANMC directors. Usable data were received from 64 centers. ANMCs in the sample were relatively small in terms of patients and volume. Client and service profiles demonstrated variation, which seemed to be reflective of needs relative to populations and communities served. Nearly half of the ANMCs responding served clients of all ages, with services representing the breadth of primary care (i.e., health maintenance and management of minor acute and common chronic illnesses). Evidence of community-focused care was also noted. The reported use of standardized nursing language was low. Standardized medical taxonomies were more commonly used, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision being the most common. ANMCs provide a small but substantial amount of primary care services in communities served. Findings indicated a need for ANMCs to improve the documentation of their contributions through the use of standardized taxonomies to provide aggregated reporting for policy and research purposes.

National consensus on data elements for nurse managed health centers.

This report presents a summary of the findings from the National Network for Nurse Managed Health Centers Data Consensus Conference. Nationally, nurse-managed health centers are increasingly offering communities another option for access to high-quality primary care. The lack of agreed upon, standardized data elements for these centers has limited the ability to present clear information about their contributions as well as to inform policy related to their support and development. Fifty-three national invitees came to consensus in Washington, DC on the critical data elements for a national database for nurse-managed health centers. This database includes both clinical and financial/business practices elements. Consensus was not reached around some clinical areas. These areas are briefly discussed as well as the plans for next stages of data collection.

Cultural competence of nurse practitioner students: a consortium's experience.

Professional standards require culturally competent care, but competencies are rarely assessed. An instrument adapted from the work of cultural competence experts was used to assess the cultural competence of nurse practitioner students (n = 122). The 30-item instrument indicated adequate reliability scores (.78 to .87). Students reported high levels of comfort with people who are different from themselves and felt that cultural knowledge was important. Students scored fairly low on engaging in community-related culturally relevant behaviors. Predictors of culturally competent behaviors in clinical practice and the community were: comfort with others who are different from themselves, the degree of importance attached to cultural knowledge, and likelihood of future practice in rural areas. Nurse practitioner programs need to concentrate on increasing students' comfort with culturally diverse client groups and stressing a deeper cultural knowledge in clinical practice.

Academic nurse-managed centers: approaches to evaluation.

A comprehensive evaluation plan was developed to assess the outcomes of a multiuniversity project to support the development of academic nurse-managed centers (ANMCs). The evaluation included measuring ANMC impact on the clients and communities served, on students, and on the sponsoring faculties and universities. This article includes a discussion of the processes used in evaluation plan development, the variables measured, the tools developed to measure selected variables, and a summary of evaluation findings. Recommendations for use of selected evaluation components across ANMCs are presented.

Education of nurse practitioners in academic nurse-managed centers: student perspectives.

Clinical experiences for advanced practice nurses are increasingly a challenge. Finding settings that demonstrate primary care nursing practice in its finest form can be difficult. This article reports on nurse practitioner (NP) student feedback on clinical placements in the academic nurse-managed centers (ANMCs) associated with four Michigan schools or colleges of nursing. Student feedback was solicited over three years through site and preceptor evaluation tools and focus groups. Students were overwhelmingly satisfied with their experience in ANMCs. Being mentored by an NP preceptor in an ANMC was a valuable experience for students. They valued the role modeling of the NP and the quality of their preceptors' instruction. Students stated that the nursing model of care to which they were exposed was congruent with classroom learning. They reported learning to apply an understanding of their patients' economic, social, and cultural situations to treatment decisions and patient-education efforts and learning to understand the role of community-based care. One limitation of ANMCs from the students' perspective was a relatively low volume of patients, particularly in the initial years. However, the benefit of having time to spend with clients and to reflect on clinical practice was also articulated.

Patient satisfaction outcomes in nurse-managed centers.

Patient satisfaction remains one of the critical benchmarks of primary care delivery. Although much of the research reporting outcomes related to nurse-managed centers (NMC) has included patient satisfaction, most of the reports have been limited to individual clinical settings. This study collected satisfaction data from 7 NMCs operated by 4 different academic institutions. Results demonstrated 3 components of patient satisfaction: patient perceptions of care, phone contact, and the patient's willingness to return to or recommend the clinic. Consistent with previous research, professional responsiveness and respect and courtesy from nurse practitioners were rated high on the composite satisfaction levels from a heterogeneous sample of consumers.