RESUMO
Background: Ever since the description of the first microvascular anastomosis, numerous alternative methods have been described to the classical approach. Tissue adhesive has shown promising result in previous studies and can be a fast and efficient alternative which still requires more studies to allow its clinical implementation. Methods: A randomized comparative experimental study was conducted on rats' femoral arteries and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed in order to compare 2 anastomosis techniques. In one group, a simple interrupted suture was utilized, whereas in the second group a combination between fewer sutures and tissue adhesive was used. The anastomotic time, total operative time, blood flow velocity before, immediately after and 48 hours after the procedure, as well as an independent grading of the anastomosis immediately after the procedure were performed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in order to assess the degree of stenosis. After euthanasia, histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed on the vessels in order to assess possible complications. Results: A total of 24 anastomoses were performed, of which 12 with a classic technique and 12 with an adhesive technique. All the anastomoses were patent with a significant reduction of anastomotic and total operative time. The grading of the anastomoses showed better results in the classic suture group. The blood flow velocities were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. On MRI there was one stenotic anastomosis, whereas histology and SEM showed more complications on the adhesive group. Conclusion: Anastomotic times were significantly lower with a non-significant trend toward more thrombotic complications in the adhesive group. Further improvement of the glue properties and refinement of the technique will likely make it a viable alternative to interrupted suturing in the future.
Historique: Depuis que la première anastomose microvasculaire a été décrite, de nombreuses méthodes ont été utilisées en plus de la méthode classique. L'adhésif tissulaire a donné des résultats prometteurs dans des études antérieures et peut représenter une solution rapide et efficace qui devra faire l'objet de plus d'études avant d'être adoptée en clinique. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont mené une étude expérimentale aléatoire et comparative sur des artères fémorales de rat. Ils ont effectué une anastomose de bout en bout pour comparer deux techniques d'anastomose. Dans un groupe, une seule suture interrompue a été utilisée, et dans le second, une combinaison d'un moins grand nombre de sutures et d'adhésif tissulaire a été privilégiée. La durée de l'anastomose, la durée totale de l'intervention, la vélocité du débit sanguin avant, immédiatement après et 48 heures après l'intervention, de même que le classement indépendant de l'anastomose immédiatement après l'intervention. L'imagerie par résonance magnétique a permis d'évaluer le degré de sténose. Après l'euthanasie, les chercheurs ont effectué l'histologie et la microscopie électronique sur les vaisseaux pour évaluer les complications possibles. Résultats: Au total, 24 anastomoses ont été exécutées, soit 12 avec la technique classique et 12 avec la technique d'adhésion. Toutes les anastomoses étaient perméables et s'associaient à une réduction importante de la durée de l'anastomose et de l'opération totale. Le classement de l'anastomose a révélé de meilleurs résultats dans le groupe de suture classique. La vélocité du débit sanguin n'était pas statistiquement significative entre les deux groupes. On a constaté une anastomose sténosée à l'imagerie par résonance magnétique, tandis que l'histologie et la microscopie électronique ont révélé plus de complications dans le groupe d'adhésion. Conclusion: La durée de l'anastomose était beaucoup plus courte et présentait une tendance non significative vers un plus grand nombre de complications thrombotiques dans le groupe d'adhésion. Des améliorations des propriétés de la coller et le raffinement des techniques en feront probablement une solution viable pour remplacer les sutures.
RESUMO
With the advancement of Alzheimer's disease as well as other types of dementia, in addition to the cognitive decline, psychiatric symptoms have been outlined, including psychotic symptoms. The aim of the study is to review the available results on the antipsychotic treatment of Alzheimer's disease associated psychotic symptoms. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The second objective is to assess the tolerability of this treatment. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, which took place over the course of at least 4 weeks, have been searched. Studies that compared one atypical antipsychotic to placebo, as well as more atypical antipsychotics, compared one to another, have been taken into account. In total 17 studies have been selected. The efficacy of the atypical antipsychotics has proven to be significant in most studies. Moreover, antipsychotic medication, such as risperidone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and pimavanserin, has been well tolerated. Atypical antipsychotics are the treatment of choice for psychotic symptoms in dementia. Despite the consistent results present in the literature up to this point, various antipsychotics remain insufficiently studied and would need more generous sample sizes for their outcomes to be substantiated.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Antipsicóticos , Transtornos Psicóticos , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The double stitch everting (DSE) technique, in which time is won by leaving the needle inside the vessel wall in-between stitching, is a modification of the end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis in the interest of reducing anastomosis time. This ensures proper wall eversion, intima-to-intima contact, and improved suture symmetry. METHODS: We designed an N-of-1 randomized trial with each microsurgeon as their own control. We included 10 microsurgeons of different levels of experience who were then asked to perform classic and DSE ETS anastomoses on the chicken leg and rat femoral models. Every anastomosis was cut and evaluated using blinded assessment. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze the results and for confounder adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 210 anastomoses were performed, of which 177 on the chicken leg and 43 on the rat femoral artery and vein. From the 210 anastomoses, 111 were performed using the classic technique and 99 using the DSE technique. The mean anastomosis time was 28.8 ± 11.3 minutes in the classic group and 24.6 ± 12 minutes in the DSE group (p < 0.001, t-test). There was a significant reduction (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA) in the number of mistakes when using the DSE technique (mean 5.5 ± 2.6) compared with those using the classic technique (mean 7.7 ± 3.4). CONCLUSION: The DSE technique for ETS anastomoses improves anastomoses times in experienced and moderately experienced microsurgeons while also improving or maintaining suture symmetry and lowering the number of mistakes.