[Current state and future prospects of CAR T-cell therapy for myeloid malignancies].

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is among the most promising immunotherapies for hematological malignancies and can be used to treat myeloid malignancies in practice. However, developing CAR-T therapies for such diseases is particularly challenging due to the heterogeneity of target antigen expression across leukemic cells and patients, the difficulty in excluding on-target/off-target tumor effects, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To date, various targets, including CD33, NKG2D, CD123, CLL-1, and CD7, have been actively studied for CAR-T cells, especially for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although no CAR-T cell products have been approved, several clinical trials have shown promising results, particularly for those targeting CLL-1 and CD123. Furthermore, new ideal targets and use of allogeneic or off-the-shelf CAR-T cell products are under investigation. Meanwhile, it remains unknown whether CAR-T therapy would be effective for other myeloid malignancies, including myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative diseases. This review discusses challenges in the development of CAR-T therapy for myeloid malignancies, especially for AML, from the perspectives of target antigen characteristics and disease-specific on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Moreover, it discusses the clinical development and prospects of CAR-T cells for these diseases.

A novel treatment strategy targeting cellular pathways with natural products to alleviate sarcopenia.

Sarcopenia is a condition marked by a significant reduction in muscle mass and strength, primarily due to the aging process, which critically impacts muscle protein dynamics, metabolic functions, and overall physical functionality. This condition leads to increased body fat and reduced daily activity, contributing to severe health issues and a lower quality of life among the elderly. Recognized in the ICD-10-CM only in 2016, sarcopenia lacks definitive treatment options despite its growing prevalence and substantial social and economic implications. Given the aging global population, addressing sarcopenia has become increasingly relevant and necessary. The primary causes include aging, cachexia, diabetes, and nutritional deficiencies, leading to imbalances in protein synthesis and degradation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and hormonal changes. Exercise remains the most effective intervention, but it is often impractical for individuals with limited mobility, and pharmacological options such as anabolic steroids and myostatin inhibitors are not FDA-approved and are still under investigation. This review is crucial as it examines the potential of natural products as a novel treatment strategy for sarcopenia, targeting multiple mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis. By exploring natural products' multi-targeted effects, this study aims to provide innovative and practical solutions for sarcopenia management. Therefore, this review indicates significant improvements in muscle mass and function with the use of specific natural compounds, suggesting promising alternatives for those unable to engage in regular physical activity.

Time to Functional Loss as an Endpoint in Huntington's Disease Trials: Enrichment and Sample Size.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial scenarios can be modeled using data from observational studies, providing critical information for design of real-world trials. The Huntington's Disease Integrated Staging System (HD-ISS) characterizes disease progression over an individual's lifespan and allows for flexibility in the design of trials with the goal of delaying progression. Enrichment methods can be applied to the HD-ISS to identify subgroups requiring smaller estimated sample sizes. OBJECTIVE: Investigate time to the event of functional decline (HD-ISS Stage 3) as an endpoint for trials in HD and present sample size estimates after enrichment. METHODS: We classified individuals from observational studies according to the HD-ISS. We assessed the ability of the prognostic index normed (PIN) and its components to predict time to HD-ISS Stage 3. For enrichment, we formed groups from deciles of the baseline PIN distribution for HD-ISS Stage 2 participants. We selected enrichment subgroups closer to Stage 3 transition and estimated sample sizes, using delay in the transition time as the effect size. RESULTS: In predicting time to HD-ISS Stage 3, PIN outperforms its components. Survival curves for each PIN decile show that groups with PIN from 1.48 to 2.74 have median time to Stage 3 of approximately 2 years and these are combined to create enrichment subgroups. Sample size estimates are presented by enrichment subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: PIN is predictive of functional decline. A delay of 9 months or more in the transition to Stage 3 for an enriched sample yields feasible sample size estimates, demonstrating that this approach can aid in planning future trials. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Engaging Asian American Family Caregivers in Clinical Trials: Awareness, Preferences, and Concerns.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Asian American caregivers' experiences and concerns related to clinical trials and the types of information they trust, use, and prefer before enrolling their older relative in a clinical trial. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey with Asian American family caregivers between July 2022 and April 2023. Of all respondents (n = 98), 62.2% reported knowing only a little about clinical trials. Respondents expressed wanting information about (a) the purpose, design, and components of the trial; (b) trial research ethics and safety; and (c) their responsibilities as the caregiver. Greater engagement between clinicians and family caregivers of culturally diverse older adults could help minimize sociocultural barriers to participation in clinical trials. Providing key information to family caregivers in a comprehensive and accessible way without adding burden could help caregivers understand their responsibilities through the clinical trial process.

A comprehensive review of phase 2/3 trials in osteoarthritis: an expert opinion.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative, and debilitating disease associated with significant long-term morbidity and disability. The pathogenesis of OA is not completely understood but involves an interplay between environmental risk factors, joint mechanics, abnormal pain pathways and upregulation of inflammatory signaling pathways. Current therapeutic options for patients are limited to conservative management, minimal pharmacological options or surgical management, with significant caveats to all approaches. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we have set out to investigate current phase II/III clinical trials by undertaking a PubMed search. Examined clinical trials have explored a myriad of potential therapeutics from conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biologics usually used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritides, to more novel approaches targeting inflammatory pathways implicated in OA, cartilage degeneration or pain pathways. EXPERT OPINION: Unfortunately, most completed phase II/III clinical trials have shown little impact on patient pain scores, with the exception of the traditional DMARD methotrexate and Sprifermin. Methotrexate has been shown to be beneficial when used in the correct patient cohort (MRI proven synovitis). Sprifermin has the longest follow-up data of 5 years and has been shown to reduce loss of MRI-measured cartilage thickness and pain scores.

Strengthening clinical trials in African primary care.

Not applicable.

Advances in gene therapy for high-grade glioma: a review of the clinical evidence.

INTRODUCTION: High-grade glioma (HGG) is one of the most deadly and difficult cancers to treat. Despite intense research efforts, there has not been a significant breakthrough in treatment outcomes since the early 2000's. Anti-glioma gene therapy has demonstrated promise in preclinical studies and is under investigation in numerous clinical trials. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript reviews the current landscape of clinical trials exploring gene therapy treatment of HGG. Using information from clinicaltrials.gov, all trials initiated within the past 5 years (2018-2023) as well as other important trials were cataloged and reviewed. This review discusses trial details, innovative methodologies, and concurrent pharmacological interventions. The review also delves into the subtypes of gene therapy used, trends over time, and future directions. EXPERT OPINION: Trials are in the early stages (phase I or II), and there are reports of clinical efficacy in published results. Synergistic effects utilizing immunotherapy within or alongside gene therapy are emerging as a promising avenue for future breakthroughs. Considerable heterogeneity exists across trials concerning administration route, vector selection, drug combinations, and intervention timing. Earlier intervention in newly diagnosed HGG and avoidance of corticosteroids may improve efficacy in future trials. The results from ongoing trials demonstrate promising potential for molding the future landscape of HGG care.

Is "Less be More" Still a Valid Concept in Intensive Care? A Review of Critical Care Randomized Clinical Trials from the New England Journal of Medicine.

The concept of "Less is more" has been gaining increasing awareness and acceptance in Critical Care. In 2017, we attempted to systematically answer the question "Can less be more in intensive care" with empirical data. We reviewed all the critical care randomized clinical trials (RCTs) between 1 January 2008 and 5 October 2016 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). This article attempts to repeat the earlier exercise using data from 5 October 2016 to 31 December 2023. This analysis of critical care RCTs in the NEJM has shown three findings. Approximately three-quarter of RCTs in critical care in the NEJM between 2008 and 2023 failed to show benefit or harm. In the years 2008-2016, patients in the intervention cohort had a higher mortality compared to controls, but in the years 2016-2023, the difference in overall mortality in patients in the intervention and control arms was not statistically significant. Compared to the years 2008-2016, in the years from 2016 to 2023, the number of RCTs showing harm decreased and those showing benefit increased. How to cite this article: Kapadia F, Bharadwaj S, Sharma R. Is "Less be More" Still a Valid Concept in Intensive Care? A Review of Critical Care Randomized Clinical Trials from the New England Journal of Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):533-551.

Advantages of Lissamine Green Vital Staining as an Endpoint in Dry Eye Clinical Trials.

Purpose: The absence of a standardized diagnostic method for clinical signs of Dry Eye Disease (DED) complicates clinical trials for future treatments. This paper evaluated Lissamine Green (LG) conjunctival staining as a valid, stable and modifiable endpoint for both clinical practice and clinical trials. Methods: Screening and pre-randomization data from two identically designed clinical trials for DED resulted in a pooled dataset of 494 subjects. Inclusion was based on reported symptoms, lissamine green (LG) conjunctival staining, Fluorescein (Fl) corneal and conjunctival staining, and Schirmer's Test (ST). Outcome measures were assessed based on the modifiability of LG staining to exposure to a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®), correlation of LG to Fl staining, relative variation of LG staining scores and Schirmer test scores, and the correlation of LG staining with symptom scores. Results: The modifiability of LG conjunctival staining to environmental exposure was demonstrated, with nasal LG and FL staining displaying the most similar percent change. Nasal LG conjunctival staining scores for subjects with ST scores of less than 8mm were significantly higher than for subjects with ST greater than 8mm. LG staining scores were more consistent (25% change from baseline threshold) than ST scores. Finally, statistically significant correlations were found between LG staining and a number of symptom scores. Conclusion: This evaluation demonstrates the superiority of the utilization of a clinical endpoint focused on ocular surface damage. The reproducibility and modifiability of LG conjunctival staining to controlled adverse environment, coupled with its significant correlation with symptoms, positions it as an exemplary clinical sign endpoint for clinical management and in clinical trials. Our findings advocate for the adoption of LG conjunctival staining as a primary endpoint in both clinical research and drug development, offering a more effective means of identifying and addressing ocular surface damage in the realm of DED.

Promising therapy for neuroendocrine prostate cancer: current status and future directions.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a highly aggressive variant of castration-resistant prostate cancer. It is characterized by low or no expression of the androgen receptor (AR), activation of AR-independent signaling, and increased neuroendocrine phenotype. Most of NEPC is induced by treatment of androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). Currently, the treatment of NEPC follows the treatment strategy for small-cell lung cancer, lacking effective drugs and specific treatment options. This review summarizes potential novel targets and therapies for NEPC treatment, including epigenetic regulators (zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitors), aurora kinase A inhibitors, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, delta-like ligand 3 targeted therapies, a combination of immunotherapies, etc. Other promising targets and future directions are also discussed in this review. These novel targets and therapies may provide new opportunities for the treatment of NEPC.

This review summarizes potential novel targets and therapies for NEPC treatment, including epigenetic regulators (EZH2 inhibitors, LSD-1 inhibitors), AURKA inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, and DLL3 targeted therapies, and combination of immunotherapies, etc. These novel targets and therapies may provide new opportunities in the treatment of NEPC.

Globalization of clinical research in oncology: status, challenges, and future directions.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the second-leading cause of death worldwide, and its burden is increasing around the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, cancer research has historically been conducted primarily in high-income countries (HICs). METHODS: In this review, we describe the results of our literature search into the current state of international cancer trials, including the benefits, challenges, limitations, and ethical concerns regarding the international conduct of HIC-led trials. We also propose some possible means of addressing these challenges and overcoming these barriers to extend the benefits of cancer research to people around the world. RESULTS: Over the last several decades, there has been a shift toward inclusion of investigators and participants from LMICs in pivotal cancer clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: While inclusion of LMIC countries has benefits, including increased diversity of participant populations, investment in research infrastructure in LMICs, and potential expansion of cancer treatment options around the world, the continued leadership of most trials by HICs presents ethical concerns, including potential exploitation of researchers and participants from LMICs, lack of focus on cancer types prevalent in all participating regions, and disparities in access to approved therapies once the trial is complete.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Efzimfotase Alfa, a Second-generation Enzyme Replacement Therapy: Phase 1, Dose-escalation Study in Adults with Hypophosphatasia.

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited metabolic disease caused by deficient activity of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP). Efzimfotase alfa (ALXN1850) is a second-generation TNSALP enzyme replacement therapy in development for HPP. This first-in-human open-label, dose-escalating phase 1 trial evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of efzimfotase alfa. Fifteen adults (five per cohort) with HPP received efzimfotase alfa 15 mg (cohort 1), 45 mg (cohort 2), or 90 mg (cohort 3) as one i.v. dose followed by 3 weekly s.c. doses. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics of ALP substrates known to be biomarkers of disease (inorganic pyrophosphate [PPi] and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate [PLP]), and immunogenicity. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 12 (80%) participants. Eight (53%) participants had injection site reactions (ISRs), observed after 10 of 41 (24%) s.c. injections. Most ISR TEAEs were mild and resolved within 1-2 days. Peak and total exposures of efzimfotase alfa increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner over 15-90 mg after i.v. and s.c. dosing. Arithmetic mean elimination t½ was approximately 6 days; absolute bioavailability ranged from 28.6% to 36.8% over the s.c. dose range of 15-90 mg. Dose-dependent reductions in plasma concentrations of PPi and PLP relative to baseline reached nadir in the first week after i.v. dosing and were sustained for 3-4 weeks after the last s.c. dose. Four (27%) participants tested positive for antidrug antibodies (ADAs), three of whom were ADA positive before the first dose of efzimfotase alfa. ADAs had no apparent effect on efzimfotase alfa pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. No participants were positive for neutralizing antibodies. Efzimfotase alfa demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles and was associated with sustained reductions in biomarkers of disease in adults with HPP, supporting further evaluation in adult and pediatric patients. REGISTRATION: NCT04980248.

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare metabolic disease caused by low activity of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP), which is an enzyme involved in the formation and healing of bone and function of other body systems. People with HPP experience fractures, difficulty moving and walking, muscle weakness, pain, fatigue (tiredness), and teeth problems. Babies with HPP often have life-threatening breathing problems, craniosynostosis (early closure of skull bones), seizures that respond to treatment with vitamin B6, failure to thrive (inability to gain weight), and weak and abnormally shaped bones. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for HPP was developed to supplement defective TNSALP with active enzyme, thus improving bone health and the symptoms of HPP. Asfotase alfa, the first ERT approved for the treatment of HPP is given by subcutaneous injection either 3 or 6 times per week. Efzimfotase alfa is a second-generation ERT that is being developed for the treatment of HPP. While similar to asfotase alfa, efzimfotase alfa has incorporated several changes that have the potential to require lower doses and reduce injection volume and dosing frequency, thereby potentially improving the treatment experience for patients. This first-in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (how a drug is absorbed into, distributed throughout, and removed from the body), pharmacodynamics (effects of the drug within the body), and immunogenicity (ability of a drug to provoke an undesirable immune response) of four injections of efzimfotase alfa when given by intravenous and subcutaneous routes of administration to adults with HPP. Our results showed that efzimfotase alfa has acceptable safety and pharmacokinetics and is effective for reducing biomarkers (measurable substances that reflect underlying disease) when given once weekly by subcutaneous injection, supporting further evaluation of efzimfotase alfa in planned clinical trials in adult and pediatric patients with HPP.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Clinical Core.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core is responsible for coordination of all clinical activities at the ADNI sites, including project management, regulatory oversight, and site management and monitoring, as well as the collection of all clinical data and management of all study data. The Clinical Core is also charged with determining the clinical classifications and criteria for enrollment in evolving AD trials and enabling the ongoing characterization of the cross-sectional features and longitudinal trajectories of the ADNI cohorts with application of these findings to optimal clinical trial designs. More than 2400 individuals have been enrolled in the cohorts since the inception of ADNI, facilitating refinement of our understanding of the AD trajectory and allowing academic and industry investigators to model therapeutic trials across the disease spectrum from the presymptomatic stage through dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Since 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core has overseen the enrollment of > 2400 participants with mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and normal cognition. The longitudinal dataset has elucidated the full cognitive and clinical trajectory of AD from its presymptomatic stage through the onset of dementia. The ADNI data have supported the design of most major trials in the field.

Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event.

BACKGROUND: Digital technologies, such as wearable devices and smartphone applications (apps), can enable the decentralisation of clinical trials by measuring endpoints in people's chosen locations rather than in traditional clinical settings. Digital endpoints can allow high-frequency and sensitive measurements of health outcomes compared to visit-based endpoints which provide an episodic snapshot of a person's health. However, there are underexplored challenges in this emerging space that require interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. A multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event was organised to facilitate conversations across silos within this research ecosystem. METHODS: A survey was sent to an initial list of stakeholders to identify potential discussion topics. Additional stakeholders were identified through iterative discussions on perspectives that needed representation. Co-design meetings with attendees were held to discuss the scope, format and ethos of the event. The event itself featured a cross-disciplinary selection of talks, a panel discussion, small-group discussions facilitated via a rolling seating plan and audience participation via Slido. A transcript was generated from the day, which, together with the output from Slido, provided a record of the day's discussions. Finally, meetings were held following the event to identify the key challenges for digital endpoints which emerged and reflections and recommendations for dissemination. RESULTS: Several challenges for digital endpoints were identified in the following areas: patient adherence and acceptability; algorithms and software for devices; design, analysis and conduct of clinical trials with digital endpoints; the environmental impact of digital endpoints; and the need for ongoing ethical support. Learnings taken for next generation events include the need to include additional stakeholder perspectives, such as those of funders and regulators, and the need for additional resources and facilitation to allow patient and public contributors to engage meaningfully during the event. CONCLUSIONS: The event emphasised the importance of consortium building and highlighted the critical role that collaborative, multi-disciplinary, and cross-sector efforts play in driving innovation in research design and strategic partnership building moving forward. This necessitates enhanced recognition by funders to support multi-stakeholder projects with patient involvement, standardised terminology, and the utilisation of open-source software.

Impact of the ketogenic diet as a dietary approach on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of mortality globally, and the scarcity of scientific evidence regarding the impact of ketogenic diets on CVD risk factors necessitates urgent attention and redress. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of the ketogenic diet on CVD risk factors compared with control diets through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The study was registered in advance in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023491853). A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant RCTs. Fixed and random effects were employed to calculate the mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for changes in CVD risk factors pre- and postketogenic diet intervention. RESULTS: A total of 27 RCTs with 1278 participants were analyzed. The ketogenic diet intervention presented increase in total cholesterol (mean differences: 0.36 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.57; I2: 85.1%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean differences: 0.35 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.50; I2: 73.9%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean differences: 0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.23; I2: 86.7%) concentrations. Reductions were observed in the triglyceride (mean differences: -0.20 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.29, -0.11; I2: 72.2%), blood glucose (mean differences: -0.18 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.33, -0.02; I2: 76.4%), blood insulin (mean differences: -8.32 pmol/L; 95% CI: -14.52, -2.12; I2: 81.5%), diastolic blood pressure (mean differences: -1.41 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.57, -0.26; I2: 49.1%), weight (mean differences: -2.59 kg; 95% CI: -3.90, -1.28; I2: 87.4%), and body mass index (mean differences: -1.59 kg/m2; 95% CI: -2.32, -0.86; I2: 84.5%) concentrations after implementing ketogenic diets. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ketogenic diet demonstrates benefits in terms of triglyceride, blood pressure, weight, and glycemic control, its impact on CVD risk factors, especially the elevated total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, warrants a cautious approach.

Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) represents a challenging malignancy characterized by aggressive behavior, high relapse rates, and poor prognosis. In recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various cancers, but its efficacy in BTC remains limited. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the advances in preclinical and clinical studies of immunotherapy for BTC. We explore the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in reshaping the management of BTC. Despite disappointing results thus far, ongoing clinical trials are investigating the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modalities. Furthermore, research on the tumor microenvironment has unveiled novel targets for immunotherapeutic interventions. By understanding the current state of immunotherapy in BTC and highlighting future directions, this article aims to fuel further exploration and ultimately improve patient outcomes in this challenging disease.

The relationship between blinding integrity and medication efficacy in randomised-controlled trials in patients with anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blinding is thought to minimise expectancy effects and biases in double-blind randomised-controlled trials (RCTs). However, whether blinding integrity should be assessed and reported remains debated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether blinding failure influences the outcome of RCTs in anxiety disorders. We carried out a systematic review to understand whether blinding integrity is assessed and reported in anxiolytic RCTs. A secondary aim was to explore whether blinding integrity is associated with treatment efficacy. METHOD: Our protocol was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022328750). We searched electronic databases for placebo-controlled, randomised trials of medication in adults with generalised and social anxiety disorders, and in panic disorder, from 1980. We extracted data regarding blinding integrity and treatment efficacy. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Where possible, we subsequently calculated Bang's Blinding Index, and assessed the association between blinding integrity and treatment effect size. RESULTS: Of the 248 RCTs that met inclusion criteria, we were able to obtain assessments of blinding integrity from nine (3.63%). Overall, blinding failed in five of these trials (55.56%), but blinding was intact in 80% of placebo arms. We found a significant association between reduced blinding integrity among assessors and increased treatment effect size (betas < -6.50, p's < 0.001), but this analysis involved only four studies of which two were outlying studies. In patients, we saw a non-significant trend where reduced blinding integrity in the placebo groups was associated with increased treatment efficacy, which was not present in active medication arms. CONCLUSION: Consistent with work in other psychiatric disorders, blinding integrity is rarely reported in anxiolytic RCTs. Where it is reported, blinding appears to often fail. We found signals that suggest unblinding of clinician assessors (driven by two studies with complete unblinding), and of patients in placebo arms, might be associated with larger treatment effect sizes. We recommend that data regarding blinding integrity, along with the reasons patients and assessors offer for their beliefs regarding group allocation, are systematically collected in RCTs of anxiolytic treatment.

The relationship between treatment-related changes in total hip bone mineral density measured after 12, 18 and 24 months and fracture risk reduction in osteoporosis clinical trials: the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE Project.

There is a strong association between total hip bone mineral density (THBMD) changes after 24 months of treatment and reduced fracture risk. We examined whether changes in THBMD after 12- and 18 months of treatment are also associated with fracture risk reduction. We used individual patient data (n = 122 235 participants) from 22 randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of osteoporosis medications. We calculated the difference in mean percent change in THBMD (active-placebo) at 12, 18, and 24 months using data available for each trial. We determined the treatment-related fracture reductions for the entire follow-up period, using logistic regression for radiologic vertebral fractures and Cox regression for hip, non-vertebral, "all" (combination of non-vertebral, clinical vertebral, and radiologic vertebral) fractures, and all clinical fractures (combination of non-vertebral and clinical vertebral). We performed meta-regression to estimate the study-level association (r2 and 95% confidence interval) between treatment-related differences in THBMD changes for each BMD measurement interval and fracture risk reduction. The meta-regression revealed that for vertebral fractures, the r2 (95% confidence interval) was 0.59 (0.19, 0.75), 0.69 (0.32, 0.82), and 0.73 (0.33, 0.84) for 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for hip: r2 = 0.27 (0.00, 0.54), 0.39 (0.02, 0.63), and 0.41 (0.02, 0.65); non-vertebral: r2 = 0.27 (0.01, 0.52), 0.49 (0.10, 0.69), and 0.53 (0.11, 0.72); all fractures: r2 = 0.44 (0.10, 0.64), 0.63 (0.24, 0.77), and 0.66 (0.25, 0.80); and all clinical fractures: r2 = 0.46 (0.11, 0.65), 0.64 (0.26, 0.78), and 0.71 (0.32, 0.83), for 12-, 18- and 24-month changes in THBMD, respectively. These findings demonstrate that treatment-related THBMD changes at 12, 18 and 24 months are associated with fracture risk reductions across trials. We conclude that BMD measurement intervals as short as 12 months could be used to assess fracture efficacy, but the association is stronger with longer BMD measurement intervals.

In this study, we looked at how changes in hip bone density over time relate to the risk of fractures in people taking osteoporosis medications. We analysed data from over 122 000 participants across 22 different clinical trials. We found that the increase in bone density measured after 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment was linked to the risk of fractures. Specifically, greater improvements in bone density were associated with fewer fractures in the spine, hips, and other bones. Using statistical methods, we calculated the strength of this association. We discovered that the later we measured bone mineral density in people taking the medication, the stronger the link between improved bone density and reduced fracture risk became. Our findings suggest that bone density measurements after 12 months of treatment could help predict how well a medication will prevent fractures. However, the best predictions came from bone density changes measured over longer periods.

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy.

Aim: To compare long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (lisdexamfetamine), methylphenidate hydrochloride (methylphenidate) and atomoxetine hydrochloride (atomoxetine), respectively, in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs). Patients & methods: Patient-level data from a centanafadine trial (NCT03605849) and published aggregate data from a lisdexamfetamine trial (NCT00337285), a methylphenidate trial (NCT00326300) and an atomoxetine trial (NCT00190736) were used. Patient characteristics were matched in each comparison using propensity score weighting. Study outcomes were assessed up to 52 weeks and included safety (rates of adverse events [AEs]) and efficacy (mean change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale [AISRS] or ADHD Rating Scale [ADHD-RS] score). Results: In all comparisons of matched populations, risks of AEs were statistically significantly lower with centanafadine or non-different between centanafadine and comparator; the largest differences in AE rates included upper respiratory tract infection (risk difference in percentage points: 18.75), insomnia (12.47) and dry mouth (12.33) versus lisdexamfetamine; decreased appetite (20.25), headache (18.53) and insomnia (12.65) versus methylphenidate; and nausea (26.18), dry mouth (25.07) and fatigue (13.95) versus atomoxetine (all p < 0.05). Centanafadine had a smaller reduction in the AISRS/ADHD-RS score versus lisdexamfetamine (6.15-point difference; p < 0.05) and no statistically significant difference in the change in AISRS score versus methylphenidate (1.75-point difference; p = 0.13) and versus atomoxetine (1.60-point difference; p = 0.21). Conclusion: At up to 52 weeks, centanafadine showed significantly lower incidence of several AEs than lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine; efficacy was lower than lisdexamfetamine and non-different from methylphenidate and atomoxetine.

Trends in Developing Extracellular Vesicle-Based Therapeutics.

Extracellular vesicles are nano-sized vesicles surrounded by lipid bilayers, and all cells release them to the extracellular environment for communication. Extracellular vesicles consist of molecules with various biological activities and can play essential roles as therapeutics, so they attract much attention as next-generation modalities to treat various diseases. As extracellular vesicles are cell-derived nanovesicles, they are favorable to be developed as therapeutics, but they also have limitations. In addition, there are a number of things to consider in terms of manufacturing, quality control, non-clinical studies, and clinical trials during the development of extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics. Meanwhile, as much attention has been paid to the potentials of extracellular vesicles as therapeutics, many biopharmaceutical companies are trying to develop extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics. This review will introduce the advantages and limitations of extracellular vesicles as therapeutics. In addition, it will cover things to consider during developing extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics and development cases of extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics.