Emerging therapies in hereditary ataxias.

Recent investigations have defined the pathophysiological basis of many hereditary ataxias (HAs), including loss-of-function as well as gain-of-function mechanisms at either the RNA or protein level. Preclinical studies have assessed gene editing, gene and protein replacement, gene enhancement, and gene knockdown strategies. Methodologies include viral vector delivery of genes, oligonucleotide therapies, cell-penetrating peptides, synthetic transcription factors, and technologies to deliver therapies to defined targets. In this review, we focus on Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) and the polyglutamine ataxias in which translational research is active. However, much remains to be done to identify safe and effective molecules, create ideal delivery methods, and perform innovative clinical trials to prove the safety and efficacy of treatments for these rare but devastating diseases.

In India, most principal investigators have run very few trials over the years.

Background: In the past, clinical trials run in India have been the subject of criticism. Among other steps to improve the trial ecosystem, for some time the government limited the number of trials that a Principal Investigator (PI) could run to three at a time. We were interested to know how many trials PIs in India tend to run at a time. Methods: We accessed the 52,149 trial records hosted by the Clinical Trials Registry-India in April 2023. Of these, we shortlisted trials that had run in India, were interventional, and involved certain interventions such as drug, biological etc. We used multiple parameters, such as email ID, phone number etc. to determine whether one name always represented the same PI and whether two names corresponded to the same PI. We then determined how many trials each PI had run. Results: We found that 3,916 unique PI names were associated with 6,665 trials. Of these, 2,963 (75.7%) PIs had run a single study. Only 251 (6.4%) had run more than three trials. A mere 14 PIs had run 20 or more trials. The 14 PIs were affiliated with local pharma companies (6), local or global contract research organizations (4), multinational pharma companies (3) and the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy (1). The maximum number of trials run by a single PI was 108. Of these, the largest number run in a single year, 2022, was 53. Conclusion: Each PI name needs to be connected to a unique ID that does not change with time, so that it is easier to track the number of trials that a given PI has run. The number of studies run by a given PI at a given time must not be excessive and needs to be monitored more actively. The government needs to consider whether a cap on the number of trials that a PI runs at a time is required and what infrastructure needs to be in place to facilitate higher numbers of trials. Trial registry records need to be updated more regularly. Other countries may wish to do likewise.

Microbiome and Metabolome Restoration After Administration of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (REBYOTA®) for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: Microbiota-based treatments are effective in preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA®; RBL, previously RBX2660) was shown to prevent rCDI in a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled clinical trial (PUNCH™ CD3). METHODS: Stool samples from participants in PUNCH™ CD3 who received a single blinded dose of rectally administered RBL or placebo were sequenced to determine microbial community composition and calculate the Microbiome Health Index for post-antibiotic dysbiosis (MHI-A). The composition of bile acids (BAs) in the same samples was quantified by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Relationships between BA composition and microbiota community structure and correlations with treatment outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Before administration, Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli dominated the microbiota community and primary BAs were more prevalent than secondary BAs. Clinical success after administration correlated with shifts to predominantly Bacteroidia and Clostridia, a significant increase in MHI-A, and a shift from primary to secondary BAs. Several microbiota and BA changes were more extensive in RBL-treated responders compared to placebo-treated responders, and microbiota changes correlated with BA changes. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response and RBL administration were associated with significant restoration of microbiota and BA composition. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03244644.

Unlocking the Potential: Caloric Restriction, Caloric Restriction Mimetics, and Their Impact on Cancer Prevention and Treatment.

Caloric restriction (CR) and its related alternatives have been shown to be the only interventions capable of extending lifespan and decreasing the risk of cancer, along with a reduction in burden in pre-clinical trials. Nevertheless, the results from clinical trials have not been as conclusive as the pre-clinical results. Recognizing the challenges associated with long-term fasting, the application of caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs), pharmacological agents that mimic the molecular effects of CR, to harness the potential benefits while overcoming the practical limitations of fasting has resulted in an interesting alternative. This review synthesizes the findings of diverse clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of CR and CRMs. In dietary interventions, a fast-mimicking diet was the most tolerated to reduce tumoral growth markers and chemotherapy side effects. CRMs were well tolerated, and metformin and aspirin showed the most promising effect in reducing cancer risk in a selected group of patients. The application of CR and/or CRMs shows promising effects in anti-cancer therapy; however, there is a need for more evidence to safely include these interventions in standard-of-care therapies.

High-intensity resistance training improves quality of life, muscle endurance and strength in patients with myositis: a randomised controlled trial.

Myositis is associated with reduced quality of life, which is accompanied by significant impairments in muscle endurance and strength, altogether representing cardinal traits in patients with myositis. This randomised controlled trial aimed to investigate the effect of high-intensity resistance training on quality of life in patients with myositis. Thirty-two patients with established, stable myositis were randomised to 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (intervention group) or 16 weeks of usual care (control group). Primary outcome was quality of life assessed as the change in the physical component summary score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 health questionnaire from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included functional capacity measures, such as functional index 3, and International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) disease activity and damage core set measures, including manual muscle testing 8 (MMT8). The primary outcome PCS showed an improvement in favour of high-intensity resistance training with a between-group difference of 5.33 (95% CI 0.61; 10.05) (p = 0.03). Additionally, functional index 3 showed a between-group difference indicating greater gains with high-intensity resistance training 11.49 (95% CI 3.37; 19.60) (p = 0.04), along with a between-group improvement in MMT8 1.30 (95% CI 0.09; 2.51) (p = 0.04). High-intensity resistance training for 16 weeks effectively improved quality of life in patients with myositis. Clinical measures of muscle endurance and muscle strength were also found to improve with high-intensity resistance training, while patients stayed in disease remission. Consequently, progressively adjusted high-intensity resistance training is feasible and causes no aggravation of the disease, while benefitting patients with myositis.Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04486261- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04486261 .

Factor VIII stimulants and other novel therapies for the treatment of von Willebrand disease: what's new on the horizon?

INTRODUCTION: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting about 0.6% to 1.3% of the population, and is characterized primarily by mucocutaneous bleeding secondary to defective platelet adhesion and aggregation. Current therapeutic options for those with severe disease are limited and require frequent intravenous infusions. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the current and recently completed clinical trials involving pathways to FVIII augmentation for the treatment of VWD. Clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov and published data via PubMed searches through June 2024 were included. EXPERT OPINION: Available treatment options to those with VWD are limited in part due to limited clinical trials, the complexity of VWD types, and the pharmacokinetics of current treatment options. The development of therapeutic options that reduce treatment burden is necessary to improve quality of life and reduce bleeding complications and in recent years there has been an increased interest from industry to apply novel therapeutics for VWD. The FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, has demonstrated early success in patients with severe VWD and is a promising treatment option for those who require prophylaxis. Furthermore, products like efanesoctocog alfa (Altuviiio®) and BT200 have achieved enhanced VWF/FVIII half-life extension could expand the current treatment landscape while concurrently minimizing treatment burden.

Promising therapy for neuroendocrine prostate cancer: current status and future directions.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a highly aggressive variant of castration-resistant prostate cancer. It is characterized by low or no expression of the androgen receptor (AR), activation of AR-independent signaling, and increased neuroendocrine phenotype. Most of NEPC is induced by treatment of androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). Currently, the treatment of NEPC follows the treatment strategy for small-cell lung cancer, lacking effective drugs and specific treatment options. This review summarizes potential novel targets and therapies for NEPC treatment, including epigenetic regulators (zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitors), aurora kinase A inhibitors, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, delta-like ligand 3 targeted therapies, a combination of immunotherapies, etc. Other promising targets and future directions are also discussed in this review. These novel targets and therapies may provide new opportunities for the treatment of NEPC.

This review summarizes potential novel targets and therapies for NEPC treatment, including epigenetic regulators (EZH2 inhibitors, LSD-1 inhibitors), AURKA inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, and DLL3 targeted therapies, and combination of immunotherapies, etc. These novel targets and therapies may provide new opportunities in the treatment of NEPC.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Efzimfotase Alfa, a Second-generation Enzyme Replacement Therapy: Phase 1, Dose-escalation Study in Adults with Hypophosphatasia.

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited metabolic disease caused by deficient activity of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP). Efzimfotase alfa (ALXN1850) is a second-generation TNSALP enzyme replacement therapy in development for HPP. This first-in-human open-label, dose-escalating phase 1 trial evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of efzimfotase alfa. Fifteen adults (five per cohort) with HPP received efzimfotase alfa 15 mg (cohort 1), 45 mg (cohort 2), or 90 mg (cohort 3) as one i.v. dose followed by 3 weekly s.c. doses. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics of ALP substrates known to be biomarkers of disease (inorganic pyrophosphate [PPi] and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate [PLP]), and immunogenicity. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 12 (80%) participants. Eight (53%) participants had injection site reactions (ISRs), observed after 10 of 41 (24%) s.c. injections. Most ISR TEAEs were mild and resolved within 1-2 days. Peak and total exposures of efzimfotase alfa increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner over 15-90 mg after i.v. and s.c. dosing. Arithmetic mean elimination t½ was approximately 6 days; absolute bioavailability ranged from 28.6% to 36.8% over the s.c. dose range of 15-90 mg. Dose-dependent reductions in plasma concentrations of PPi and PLP relative to baseline reached nadir in the first week after i.v. dosing and were sustained for 3-4 weeks after the last s.c. dose. Four (27%) participants tested positive for antidrug antibodies (ADAs), three of whom were ADA positive before the first dose of efzimfotase alfa. ADAs had no apparent effect on efzimfotase alfa pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. No participants were positive for neutralizing antibodies. Efzimfotase alfa demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles and was associated with sustained reductions in biomarkers of disease in adults with HPP, supporting further evaluation in adult and pediatric patients. REGISTRATION: NCT04980248.

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare metabolic disease caused by low activity of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP), which is an enzyme involved in the formation and healing of bone and function of other body systems. People with HPP experience fractures, difficulty moving and walking, muscle weakness, pain, fatigue (tiredness), and teeth problems. Babies with HPP often have life-threatening breathing problems, craniosynostosis (early closure of skull bones), seizures that respond to treatment with vitamin B6, failure to thrive (inability to gain weight), and weak and abnormally shaped bones. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for HPP was developed to supplement defective TNSALP with active enzyme, thus improving bone health and the symptoms of HPP. Asfotase alfa, the first ERT approved for the treatment of HPP is given by subcutaneous injection either 3 or 6 times per week. Efzimfotase alfa is a second-generation ERT that is being developed for the treatment of HPP. While similar to asfotase alfa, efzimfotase alfa has incorporated several changes that have the potential to require lower doses and reduce injection volume and dosing frequency, thereby potentially improving the treatment experience for patients. This first-in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (how a drug is absorbed into, distributed throughout, and removed from the body), pharmacodynamics (effects of the drug within the body), and immunogenicity (ability of a drug to provoke an undesirable immune response) of four injections of efzimfotase alfa when given by intravenous and subcutaneous routes of administration to adults with HPP. Our results showed that efzimfotase alfa has acceptable safety and pharmacokinetics and is effective for reducing biomarkers (measurable substances that reflect underlying disease) when given once weekly by subcutaneous injection, supporting further evaluation of efzimfotase alfa in planned clinical trials in adult and pediatric patients with HPP.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Clinical Core.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core is responsible for coordination of all clinical activities at the ADNI sites, including project management, regulatory oversight, and site management and monitoring, as well as the collection of all clinical data and management of all study data. The Clinical Core is also charged with determining the clinical classifications and criteria for enrollment in evolving AD trials and enabling the ongoing characterization of the cross-sectional features and longitudinal trajectories of the ADNI cohorts with application of these findings to optimal clinical trial designs. More than 2400 individuals have been enrolled in the cohorts since the inception of ADNI, facilitating refinement of our understanding of the AD trajectory and allowing academic and industry investigators to model therapeutic trials across the disease spectrum from the presymptomatic stage through dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Since 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core has overseen the enrollment of > 2400 participants with mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and normal cognition. The longitudinal dataset has elucidated the full cognitive and clinical trajectory of AD from its presymptomatic stage through the onset of dementia. The ADNI data have supported the design of most major trials in the field.

Advanced Nanotechnological Approaches for Effective Delivery of Rutin: An Updated Review.

Polyphenols are a group of naturally occurring compounds that have intriguing biological activities. Among these compounds is rutin, a polyphenolic flavanol found in many plants, including passion flowers, buckwheat seed, fruits and fruit rinds, and citrus fruits (such as orange, grapefruit, lemon, and lime). Various studies have demonstrated rutin to possess antibacterial, antifungal, antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-adipogenic, anti-carcinogenic, anti-apoptotic, anti-osteoporotic, radioprotective, gastroprotective, neuroprotective, and nephroprotective activities. Despite its benefits, rutin's therapeutic applicability is severely limited due to its low water solubility, sensitivity to oxidation, and dissolving rate. However, these problems can be overcome by employing an efficient delivery approach. An extensive number of nanocarriers can be developed for medicinal use if pre-clinical as well as human-clinical studies are completed. The current review presents an overview of effective rutin nano-formulations for targeted therapy in various health disorders. This review article discusses the clinical evidence, current status, as well as future opportunities of rutin nanocarriers for increasing rutin's bioactivity for possible medicinal uses.

Assessing the Role of Patient Generation Techniques in Virtual Clinical Trial Outcomes.

Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) are growing in popularity as a tool for quantitatively predicting heterogeneous treatment responses across a population. In the context of a VCT, a plausible patient is an instance of a mathematical model with parameter (or attribute) values chosen to reflect features of the disease and response to treatment for that particular patient. A number of techniques have been introduced to determine the set of model parametrizations to include in a virtual patient cohort. These methodologies generally start with a prior distribution for each model parameter and utilize some criteria to determine whether a parameter set sampled from the priors should be included or excluded from the plausible population. No standard technique exists, however, for generating these prior distributions and choosing the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In this work, we rigorously quantify the impact that VCT design choices have on VCT predictions. Rather than use real data and a complex mathematical model, a spatial model of radiotherapy is used to generate simulated patient data and the mathematical model used to describe the patient data is a two-parameter ordinary differential equations model. This controlled setup allows us to isolate the impact of both the prior distribution and the inclusion/exclusion criteria on both the heterogeneity of plausible populations and on predicted treatment response. We find that the prior distribution, rather than the inclusion/exclusion criteria, has a larger impact on the heterogeneity of the plausible population. Yet, the percent of treatment responders in the plausible population was more sensitive to the inclusion/exclusion criteria utilized. This foundational understanding of the role of virtual clinical trial design should help inform the development of future VCTs that use more complex models and real data.

Pooling Alzheimer's disease clinical trial data to develop personalized medicine approaches is easier said than done: A proof-of-principle study and call to action.

With the advent of the first generation of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease, it is clearer now more than ever that the field needs to move toward personalized medicine. Pooling data from past trials may help identify subgroups most likely to benefit from specific treatments and thus inform future trial design. In this perspective, we report on our effort to pool data from past Alzheimer's disease trials to identify patients most likely to respond to different treatments. We delineate challenges and hurdles, from our proof-of-principle study, for which we requested access to trial datasets from various pharmaceutical companies and encountered obstacles in the process of arranging data-sharing agreements through legal departments. Six phase I-III trials from three sponsors provided access to their data (total n = 3170), which included demographic information, vital signs, primary and secondary endpoints, and in a small subset, cerebrospinal fluid amyloid (n = 165, 5.2%) and tau (n = 212, 6.7%). Data could be analyzed only within specific data access platforms, limiting potential harmonization with data provided through other platforms. Limited overlap in terms of outcome measures, clinical and biological information hindered analyses. Thus, while it is a commendable advancement that (some) trials now allow researchers to study their data, we conclude that gaining access to past trial datasets is complicated, frustrating the field's communal effort to find the best treatments for the right individuals. We provide a plea to promote harmonization and open access to data, by urging trial sponsors and the academic research community alike to remove barriers to data access and improve collaboration through practicing open science and harmonizing outcome measures, to allow investigators to learn all there is to learn from past failures and successes. HIGHLIGHTS: Pooling data from past Alzheimer's disease clinical trials may help identify subgroups most likely to benefit from specific treatments and may help inform future trial design.Accessing past trial datasets is complicated, frustrating the field's communal effort to find the best treatments for the right individuals.We urge trial sponsors and the academic research community to remove data access barriers and improve collaboration through practicing open science and harmonizing outcome measures.

An Example of a Clinical Research Ethics Committee in Türkiye: Types of Studies Analysed, Their Phases and Investigators.

Clinical studies are reviewed by clinical research ethics committees (CRECs) in order to ensure that they are conducted within the framework of good clinical practice and that the rights of volunteers are respected. Research type, department, status, scope, principal investigator's characteristics and CREC decisions were all evaluated. A total of 1044 research applications were found to have been submitted. In addition, 14.6% of the applications were clinical trials and 48.8% were retrospective studies. Of all the researchers, 50.4% of them were found to have indicated an incorrect type of research. The very low number of interventional clinical trials suggests that researchers tended to be hesitant about conducting such trials or did not have the means to do so. The fact that the applications were often submitted by indicating a wrong type of research method also signifies the investigators' lack of knowledge in this regard.

Celebrating the registration of 9.000 patients treated with CAR T cells in the EBMT registry: Collection of real-world data in the context of hematopoietic cellular therapies.

The European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has a long-standing interest in the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplantation. More than three decades ago, its members established a continental registry. Today, more than 700,000 patients have been registered, and information has been gathered on more than 800,000 transplants. This huge amount of information has allowed conducting multiple retrospective studies, evaluating changes in practices over time and for different categories of diseases, benchmarking outcome across EBMT affiliated centers, and increasingly serves to build synthetic comparators to evaluate the introduction of therapeutic innovations in the field of hematology. CAR-T cells therapies draw on human and technical resources that are also used to deliver HCT; they elicit side effects that require the implementation of risk mitigation plans; they are living drugs that persist in the body of the recipient and thus deserve prolonged follow-up; the introduction of CAR-T cells in the pharmacopeia is likely to significantly impact on the practice of BMT; for all these reasons and even before the first approvals of CAR-T Cells in Europe, EBMT engaged in a project aiming at complementing the EBMT Registry with a Cellular Therapy Form, with the objective to register CAR-T cells treated patients and collect information on their short-, middle- and long-term outcome. The goal is to provide EBMT investigators with a tool for primary analyses of the collected information and to support secondary use of data transferred at the individual level to Marketing Authorization Holders and other interested parties, to fulfill their obligations to health authorities and further evaluate the actual medical values of CAR-T Cells in different contexts and indications. The EBMT Registry received a positive opinion from the European Medicines agency in 2019, and five years later contains information on more than 9.000 treated patients. This article describes the journey to start this new activity, lessons to be drawn in view of improving the collection of real-world data, and what existing information tells us in terms of patient access.

Educating Hematology-Oncology Fellows About How to Communicate with Patients About Clinical Trials: A Needs Assessment.

Objectives: Only 5-8% of adults with cancer participate in cancer clinical trials (CCTs), with even lower rates among underrepresented groups. Improving oncologists' communication skills may enhance the frequency and quality of their discussions with patients about CCTs, consequently increasing participation. However, little is known about interest in or presence of CCT-related communication training during Hematology-Oncology (Hem-Onc) fellowships. This study aimed to describe, from the perspective of Hem-Onc fellowship program directors (PDs): (1) the current landscape of CCT education for Hem-Onc fellows; (2) the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a CCT communication skills workshop for Hem-Onc fellows. Methods: We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. PDs were surveyed and interviewed about their graduate medical education (GME) programs' current CCT curriculum, training challenges, fellows' CCT knowledge and CCT communication skills, and preferences for a CCT communication workshop. Results: PDs were surveyed (n = 40) and interviewed (n = 12). PDs reported that their institutions prioritize CCT accrual (M = 4.58, SD = .78; 1-5 scale, 5 = "Strongly Agree") and clinical research training (M = 4.20, SD = .85). CCT skills that programs least often addressed were how to (1) discuss CCTs with newly diagnosed patients, (2) talk to patients about CCTs when none are available, and (3) help patients find CCTs at other institutions. PDs were interested in a CCT communication workshop for fellows ("yes" = 67.5%, "maybe" = 32.5%) and said training would be feasible (M = 4.28, SD = .78) and useful (M = 4.47, SD = .78). Qualitative results described programs' current approaches to CCT education and insights about developing and implementing CCT communication training. Conclusions: There is a clear need to improve CCT communication skills training in Hem-Onc fellowship programs and to implement and scale such training to increase CCT participation, especially among diverse patient populations. Furthermore, Hem-Onc GME PDs view such training as feasible and useful.

Sex Difference in the Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the sex differences in enrollment into clinical trials for Dupuytren's disease (DD), treatment efficacy, and complications. Methods: Three databases were searched; Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL. Included studies were clinical trials on adult patients with DD. Exclusion criteria were non-English studies and other study designs. Two independent reviewers completed abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. The number and percentage of studies that reported ad hoc analyses for sex differences in treatment efficacy, tolerability, and complications were reported. A meta-analysis was performed on the proportion of female participants enrolled in clinical trials for DD. Results: A total of 3172 references were screened, and 59 studies were identified for full-text review. We identified 28 clinical trials for DD of which none reported secondary analyses for sex differences. Only 2 trials discussed sex differences in complications, and one trial reported sex differences in tolerability. The proportion of female participants in the meta-analysis was 19.5% [95% CI: 16.1-23.0%]. Conclusion: Sex differences in the clinical trials for DD are not widely considered in clinical trials despite their critical role. Males and females do not have equal representation in clinical trials for DD. Future studies should account for sex differences in the design and the analysis of clinical trials.

Objectif: La présente étude visait à évaluer les différences selon les sexes à l'égard de l'inscription à des études cliniques sur la maladie de Dupuytren (MD), l'efficacité du traitement et les complications. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont fouillé trois bases de données, soit Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE et EBSCO CINAHL et ont retenu les études cliniques sur les patients adultes atteints de MD. Ils ont exclu les études qui n'étaient pas rédigées en anglais et qui reposaient sur d'autres méthodologies. Deux analystes indépendants ont examiné les résumés, analysé les textes intégraux et extrait les données. Ils ont rendu compte du nombre et du pourcentage d'études qui ont fait état d'analyses ponctuelles sur les différences selon les sexes à l'égard de l'efficacité du traitement, de la tolérabilité et des complications. Ils ont procédé à une méta-analyse sur la proportion de participantes inscrites aux études cliniques sur la MD. Résultats: Au total, les chercheurs ont examiné 3172 références et ont retenu 59 études en vue d'en évaluer le texte intégral. Ils ont répertorié 28 études cliniques sur la MD, et aucune ne contenait d'analyses secondaires sur les différences selon les sexes. Seulement deux études abordaient les différences selon les sexes pour ce qui est des complications, et une étude constatait des différences selon les sexes quant à la tolérabilité. Dans la méta-analyse, la proportion de participantes s'élevait à 19,5% [IC à 95% : 16,1% à 23,0%]. Conclusion: On ne tient pas tellement compte des différences selon les sexes dans les études cliniques sur la MD, malgré leur rôle capital. Les hommes et les femmes ne sont pas représentés équitablement dans les essais cliniques sur la MD. De prochaines études devraient tenir compte des différences selon les sexes au moment d'établir la méthodologie des études cliniques et de les analyser.

The current therapeutic cancer vaccines landscape in non-small cell lung cancer.

Currently, conventional immunotherapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have low response rates and benefit only a minority of patients, particularly those with advanced disease, so novel therapeutic strategies are urgent deeded. Therapeutic cancer vaccines, a form of active immunotherapy, harness potential to activate the adaptive immune system against tumor cells via antigen cross-presentation. Cancer vaccines can establish enduring immune memory and guard against recurrences. Vaccine-induced tumor cell death prompts antigen epitope spreading, activating functional T cells and thereby sustaining a cancer-immunity cycle. The success of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rendered cancer vaccines a promising avenue, especially when combined with immunotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC. This review delves into the intricate antitumor immune mechanisms underlying therapeutic cancer vaccines, enumerates the tumor antigen spectrum of NSCLC, discusses different cancer vaccines progress and summarizes relevant clinical trials. Additionally, we analyze the combination strategies, current limitations, and future prospects of cancer vaccines in NSCLC treatment, aiming to offer fresh insights for their clinical application in managing NSCLC. Overall, cancer vaccines offer promising potential for NSCLC treatment, particularly combining with chemoradiotherapy or immunotherapy could further improve survival in advanced patients. Exploring inhaled vaccines or prophylactic vaccines represents a crucial research avenue.

Plain language summary of the CARTITUDE-4 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a phase 3 clinical trial called CARTITUDE-4. This trial compared the anti-cancer therapy ciltacabtagene autoleucel (or cilta-cel) with standard therapies in people who have multiple myeloma, a cancer that affects specific kinds of blood cells called plasma cells. The people in the study had been treated with 1 to 3 previous treatments for multiple myeloma, including a common anti-myeloma treatment called lenalidomide, but their multiple myeloma did not get better. HOW WAS THE STUDY IN THIS SUMMARY CONDUCTED?: About half of the 419 participants in this study received cilta-cel, while the other half received standard therapies, or therapies that are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma. Participants who received cilta-cel had a type of immune cell called T cells collected from their blood and genetically modified to recognize a specific protein found on myeloma cells. These modified T cells, which comprise cilta-cel, were then infused back into the bloodstream. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?: After approximately 1 year in the study, more participants were alive without their cancer getting worse in the cilta-cel group (76%) than in the standard therapies group (49%). The most common side effects in both groups were infections and low blood cell counts. Cytokine release syndrome (a potentially serious side effect caused by overactivation of the immune system) was common but mostly mild. Neurotoxicities (including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, which can cause symptoms such as headaches, changes in consciousness, and difficulty with memory, attention, speaking, or understanding others) were less common and were reported in 20.5% of participants treated with cilta-cel. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In CARTITUDE-4, more participants treated with cilta-cel showed improvements and were alive with control of their disease 12 months after receiving cilta-cel compared with participants who received standard therapies.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04181827 (CARTITUDE-4) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Precision oncology targeting FGFRs: A systematic review on pre-clinical activity and clinical outcomes of pemigatinib.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword "Pemigatinib". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings.