Advancements in differentiation between sperm cells and epithelial cells for efficient forensic DNA analysis in sexual assault cases.

Most of the sexual assault casework samples are of mixed sources. Forensic DNA laboratories are always in the requirement of a precise technique for the efficient separation of sperm and non-sperm DNA from mixed samples. Since the introduction of the differential extraction technique in 1985, it has seen significant advancements in the form of either chemicals used or modification of incubation times. Several automated and semi-automated techniques have also adopted the fundamentals of conventional differential extraction techniques. However, lengthy incubation, several manual steps, and carryover over non-sperm material in sperm fraction are some of the major limitations of this technique. Advanced cell separation techniques have shown huge promise in separating sperm cells from a mixture based on their size, shape, composition, and membrane structure and antigens present on sperm membranes. Such advanced techniques such as DEParray, ADE, FACS, LCM, HOT and their respective pros and cons have been discussed in this article. As current-day forensic techniques should be as per the line of Olympic slogan i.e., faster, higher, stronger, the advanced cell separation techniques show a huge potential to be implemented in the casework samples.

Alternative direct-to-amplification cell lysis techniques for forensically relevant non-sperm cells.

While efforts have been made to reduce the pervasive backlog of sexual assault evidence collection kits, the actual laboratory process remains very time-consuming due to the requirement of a differential lysis step before DNA purification, as well as intricate mixture analysis towards the end of the DNA workflow. Recently, an alternative, direct-to-amplification sperm lysis method (using 1 M NaOH) was identified. However, a direct cell lysis method for non-sperm cells has not been identified yet. Thus, the primary objective of this work was to find an alternative method that is quick, inexpensive, and does not require multiple purification steps for the lysis of non-sperm cells in sexual assault samples. In this study, vaginal swab samples were lysed with the control method, prepGEM™, as well as six alternative reagents: alkaline buffer with 25-200 mM NaOH, high-salt stain extraction buffer, modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, mammalian protein extraction reagent (M-PER™), digitonin buffer, and urea/thiourea buffer. Quantification using Quantifiler® Trio of vaginal and semen lysates revealed that the alkaline (25 mM NaOH) and M-PER™ methods were efficient for the lysis of vaginal epithelial cells without substantial sperm cell lysis. Following quantification, analysis of STR profiles from vaginal lysates revealed that the M-PER™ method showed promising results across all metrics examined, including the percentage of detected STR alleles, mean peak heights, peak height ratio, and interlocus balance. Thus, this method was recommended as an alternative to the traditional differential lysis method for non-sperm cells given its ability to produce amplification-ready lysates without any DNA purification step.

Organic Extraction of Nucleic Acids Using Ethanol Precipitation or Microcon® Centrifugal Filter Purification Methods.

The use of organic solvents to separate nucleic acids from other cell components is a common practice among many scientific fields, including molecular biology and biochemistry. The advantage of performing organic extractions in forensic DNA analysis is the ability to purify DNA from heavily degraded or inhibitory sample types, such as skeletal remains. These sample types require special care to ensure that the DNA is contaminant-free since they often contain PCR inhibitors that negatively impact downstream DNA analysis, resulting in unobtainable or uninterpretable short tandem repeat (STR) profiles. Purification of DNA after an organic isolation procedure is essential for improving the likelihood of obtaining valid STR profile from a challenging evidence sample. This chapter describes the methodology for extracting and purifying DNA from various types of challenging samples that are often encountered in forensic casework.

Differential Extraction with Purification via Organic/Microcon® and Promega DNA IQ™ Methods.

The differential extraction method allows for the separation of sperm cell DNA from non-sperm cell DNA by incorporating two separate lysis steps. This is crucial in forensic casework, as sexual assault samples frequently deal with a mixture of seminal fluid and other body fluids. After performing a differential lysis, DNA extraction can be completed through a variety of methods. In addition to the differential lysis, two methods will be described in this chapter for DNA purification: Organic (Phenol)/Microcon® purification and purification with the Promega DNA IQ™ System.

Towards an affinity-free, centrifugal microfluidic system for rapid, automated forensic differential extraction.

Biological evidence originating from victims of sexual assault is often comprised of unbalanced cellular mixtures with significantly higher contributions from the victim's genetic material. Enrichment of the forensically-critical sperm fraction (SF) with single-source male DNA relies on differential extraction (DE), a manually-intensive process that is prone to contamination. Due to DNA losses from sequential washing steps, some existing DE methods often fail to generate sufficient sperm cell DNA recovery for perpetrator(s) identification. Here, we propose an enzymatic, 'swab-in' rotationally-driven microfluidic device to achieve complete, self-contained, on-disc automation of the forensic DE workflow. This 'swab-in' approach retains the sample within the microdevice, enabling lysis of sperm cells directly from the evidence cutting to improve sperm cell DNA yield. We demonstrate clear proof-of-concept of a centrifugal platform that provides for timed reagent release, temperature control for sequential enzymatic reactions, and enclosed fluidic fractionation that allows for objective evaluation of the DE process chain with a total processing time of ≤15 min. On-disc extraction of buccal or sperm swabs establishes compatibility of the prototype disc with: 1) an entirely enzymatic extraction method, and 2) distinct downstream analysis modalities, such as the PicoGreen® DNA assay for nucleic acid detection and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Development and validation of a novel method "SpermX™" for high throughput differential extraction processing of sexual assault kits (SAKs) for DNA analysis.

The Sperm X method uses a nanotechnology derived polymer membrane that functions as a separation medium to effectively trap sperm cells while enabling efficient flow through of the digested epithelial cell DNA. This specialized membrane enabled development of a method that could significantly increase a forensic laboratory's ability to obtain male sperm fraction DNA profiles. The SpermX device provides a rapid, reproducible procedure that is easy to implement in a single-tube format as well as high-throughput truly automated hands-free workflows. Validation studies, performed using the manual SpermX method, include sensitivity, stability, precision (reproducibility and repeatability), mixtures, and a method comparison to the traditional differential extraction. Sensitivity and method comparison studies demonstrated a wide range of sperm cells, from a high of over 2.78 million cells (9158 ng) to a low of 25 cells (83 pg), can be trapped by the SpermX membrane. Stability studies on various substrates (i.e., carpet, cotton, denim, polyester, and silk) and degraded semen gave the expected male DNA profiles. Data from the same operator and a different operator were consistent with low variance. Mixtures, with ratios ranging from approximately 10:1-18182:1, created to simulate real casework type samples including buccal/semen, vaginal epithelial/semen, and post coital swabs at different time intervals, were tested. A comparison of the SpermX method to the conventional differential extraction method resulted in comparable probative male profile allelic data and associated statistical probabilities. For low level sperm samples, down to 25 sperm cells (83 pg), the SpermX method outperformed the conventional differential extraction with more genotypic information and associated probabilities.

Advantages of filtration method for sperm-DNA genotyping in sexual assault cases.

Differential extraction (DE) is a conventional method to isolate sperms from forensic semen samples (e.g. vaginal swab containing semen) for sperm-DNA genotyping. Subsequent to selective digestion of somatic cells in a mixture sample, sperms are collected and purified as a pellet by repetitive centrifugation based on the specific gravity of sperm heads. However, the centrifugation operation requires a technical proficiency and an extensive time to prevent a loss of sperms from the pellet as much as possible. Therefore, we devised a "filtration method (FM)", in which a vacuum filtration operation based on the size of sperm heads is adapted, instead of DE, for isolation of sperms without any loss in principle. Sperms are collected and purified on a polycarbonate membrane filter. In this study, we have compared results of forensic assays by DE and FM for sperm-DNA genotyping from forensic semen samples. Consequently, FM had advantages of easy operation, timesaving, and high yield of sperms from semen samples compared with DE, although FM had a comparable ability to DE for a purification of sperms from mixture samples. Thus, we present that FM could simply lead to success of sperm-DNA genotyping and has a possibility to supersede DE as a gold-standard method.

Analytical approaches to differential extraction for sexual assault evidence.

Many forensic laboratories face growing demands for the processing of DNA evidence from sexual assault investigations. In these cases, evidence collected from the crime scene or from the victim in the form of a Sexual Assault and Evidence Collection Kit (SAECK) typically contains a mixture of cells from at least two donors. Isolation of DNA contributions to link a sample to an alleged offender requires precise chemical treatment of each sample with the goal of separating epithelial cells from non-sperm cells. Currently, the vast majority of laboratories employ differential chemical lysis methods that require lengthy incubations and several manual steps, preventing complete automation. Numerous alternative methods for the differential extraction (DE) of sexual assault evidence have been developed to provide a solution to the growing backlog of samples observed in the US and other countries. Here, we will discuss the predominant methodology for the DE of DNA from sexual assault samples and review alternative approaches from literature. We illustrate three criteria that provide a measure of success in performing these types of chemical separations and examine all methods based upon these expectations. We conclude by providing some general insight into the application of DE techniques in forensic laboratories and discuss the potential future directions of alternative technologies.

Forensic techniques for the isolation of spermatozoa from sexual assault samples - A review.

The challenge of profiling spermatozoa from samples containing a mixture of male and female cells has been extensively discussed within the forensic community. Various techniques have been developed for the analysis of sexual assault evidence with the aim to generate a single-source male DNA profile. Multiple methods practiced for the isolation of the male component are discussed in this review, with a focus on differential extraction. Benefits of alterations that have been made to the original differential method to increase the efficiency are highlighted. Although improvements were achieved, it is ascertained by this review that these methods are limited in their overall success rate or their applicability. Perhaps future approaches and research should concentrate on more efficient, cost-effective, and time-saving techniques to individually sort or isolate spermatozoa.

Application of hematoxylin reagent for sperm cell separation in sexual crime evidence.

Seminal evidence obtained from a sexual crime scene provides clues for solving a case through forensic analysis. However, most evidence collected from sexual crime scenes is a mixture of sperm cells and vaginal discharge. Therefore, separating the sperm cells from the seminal evidence is very important. In this study, we developed a separation method for effectively separating sperm cells using differential extraction with commercially available sperm staining reagents such as hematoxylin and nigrosin. Hematoxylin (0.03 % v/v) effectively stained the sperm cells in ATL and TNE lysis buffer, while nigrosin did not. The loss of sperm cells during washing of the specimen was minimized using the differential extraction method. Subsequently, genomic DNA was extracted from the hematoxylin-stained sperm cells and subjected to short tandem repeat genotyping. We observed no interference from hematoxylin. These results indicate that hematoxylin can be used to stain sperm cells and thus facilitate subsequent genetic identification.

An Optimizing Dynamic Spectrum Differential Extraction Method for Noninvasive Blood Component Analysis.

Dynamic spectra (DS) can greatly reduce the influence of individual differences and the measurement environment by extracting the absorbance of pulsating blood at multiple wavelengths, and it is expected to achieve noninvasive detection of blood components. Extracting high-quality DS is the prerequisite for improving detection accuracy. This paper proposed an optimizing differential extraction method in view of the deficiency of existing extraction methods. In the proposed method, the sub-dynamic spectrum (sDS) is composed by sequentially extracting the absolute differences of two sample points corresponding to the height of the half peak on the two sides of the lowest point in each period of the logarithm photoplethysmography signal. The study was based on clinical trial data from 231 volunteers. Single-trial extraction method, original differential extraction method, and optimizing differential extraction method were used to extract DS from the volunteers' experimental data. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and radial basis function (RBF) neural network were used for modeling. According to the effect of PLSR modeling, by extracting DS using the proposed method, the correlation coefficient of prediction set (Rp) has been improved by 17.33% and the root mean square error of prediction set has been reduced by 7.10% compared with the original differential extraction method. Compared with the single-trial extraction method, the correlation coefficient of calibration set (Rc) has increased from 0.747659 to 0.8244, with an increase of 10.26%, while the correlation coefficient of prediction set (Rp) decreased slightly by 3.22%, much lower than the increase of correction set. The result of the RBF neural network modeling also shows that the accuracy of the optimizing differential method is better than the other two methods both in calibration set and prediction set. In general, the optimizing differential extraction method improves the data utilization and credibility compared with the existing extraction methods, and the modeling effect is better than the other two methods.

Real Time Electronic Feedback for Improved Acoustic Trapping of Micron-Scale Particles.

Acoustic differential extraction has been previously reported as a viable alternative to the repetitive manual pipetting and centrifugation steps for isolating sperm cells from female epithelial cells in sexual assault sample evidence. However, the efficiency of sperm cell isolation can be compromised in samples containing an extremely large number of epithelial cells. When highly concentrated samples are lysed, changes to the physicochemical nature of the medium surrounding the cells impacts the acoustic frequency needed for optimal trapping. Previous work has demonstrated successful, automated adjustment of acoustic frequency to account for changes in temperature and buffer properties in various samples. Here we show that, during acoustic trapping, real-time monitoring of voltage measurements across the piezoelectric transducer correlates with sample-dependent changes in the medium. This is achieved with a wideband peak detector circuit, which identifies the resonant frequency with minimal disruption to the applied voltage. We further demonstrate that immediate, corresponding adjustments to acoustic trapping frequency provides retention of sperm cells from high epithelial cell-containing mock sexual assault samples.

Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.

We report the successful separation of sperm cells from a relevant composition of mock sexual assault samples using a novel acoustic differential extraction (ADE) technology. A multi-layer microfluidic device fabricated in a non-photolithographic process from glass and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was capable of interfacing with custom-built instrumentation to exploit a standing acoustic wave for the trapping of individual sperm cells in a sample containing an abundance of epithelial cells. Samples were generated from buccal and vaginal swabs to mimic post-coital vaginal swabs, and processed through the ADE system followed by DNA extraction of the captured cells with amplification of DNA using a custom short tandem repeat (STR) chemistry. The prototype acoustic trapping technology was fully capable of isolating intact sperm cells from mock samples with disparate masses of male and female DNA. Other biological components were evaluated for adverse effects on sperm cell trapping, including blood, yeast, and bacteria (E. coli), and these had negligible effects on observed sperm cell trapping. Finally, we demonstrate the successful capture of sperm cells from mock samples containing a 40-fold excess in female epithelial cells over sperm cells. The effectiveness of sperm cell purification was ascertained with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of STR loci from the male fraction post separation with an 18-plex amplification kit, which resulted in male-only profiles.

Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.

For several decades, a common approach for processing sexual assault evidence has been to use the "standard" differential extraction to separate the evidence into a non-sperm-cell fraction and a sperm-cell fraction for further analysis. In this standard approach (P. Gill et al., Nature 318 (1985) 577-579), an initial mild chemical lysis step preferentially digests the mainly epithelial cells, which allows for removing this lysate as a non-sperm-cell fraction. The undigested sperm cells in the remaining fraction may then be purified by a series of wash and centrifugation steps, after which more robust lysis conditions are used to digest this sperm-cell fraction. Although this standard approach has been generally effective, it has been difficult to fully automate, due to the variety of different types of manipulations required for sample processing (e.g., incubation, shaking, substrate separation by centrifugation, and multiple liquid transfers for sperm-pellet centrifugation and washing steps). We describe here a fully automated standard differential extraction procedure that uses the Hamilton AutoLys STAR liquid handling assay-ready workstation, which is configured with on-deck components for sample incubation, shaking and centrifugation steps, and works with unique AutoLys-A® sample tubes for front-end sample processing. In this proof-of-concept procedure, up to 24 samples may be processed, "hands-free," in a single automated workflow. The automated procedure was tested by performing differential extractions on mock sexual assault swabs. For comparison, manual differential extractions were performed on identically prepared swabs in a side-by-side manner. DNA quantification and STR typing results showed that similar levels of separation efficiency were achieved for the sperm-cell fractions using both automated and manual procedures, although the results suggest that somewhat higher male DNA yields may be achieved for samples with extremely low semen levels (<∼0.1 µL) using the manual processing procedure. In addition to these mock samples, automated differential extractions were also performed on a set of authentic post-coital swabs (24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, post-coitus); primarily male STR profiles for the sperm-cell fractions were obtained for each sample in this set.

Evaluation of structural, functional, and anti-oxidant potential of differentially extracted polysaccharides from potatoes peels.

Potato peel was used for the extraction of three types of polysaccharides (PW, PAL, and PAC) using water, alkaline, and acid treatments, respectively. The structure of the PP polysaccharides was examined by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis and Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results suggest that the extracted polysaccharides constituted essentially three functional groups: CO, CH, and OH. The polysaccharides were comprised of low proportions of proteins, 17-23% uronic acids, and approximately 70% carbohydrates. PAL, PW, and PAC with molecular weights of 2.25 × 103, 2.18 × 103, and 1.92 × 103 kDa, respectively, were composed of rhamnose, xylose, mannose, arabinose, glucose, and galactose. Functional properties (solubility, oil holding capacity, foaming, and emulsion properties) of these polysaccharides were evaluated. Among three, PAL showed the highest fat-binding capacity which was 7.50 g/g with the solubility of 95.06%. The three polysaccharides possessed appreciable in vitro anti-oxidant (scavenging DPPH and ABTS+ radicals, chelating ferrous ions, and reducing power) potential. PAL exhibited the strongest reducing power, scavenging activity on DPPH radicals and chelating capability on ferrous ions. PP polysaccharides can be used as promising natural antioxidants in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic preparations.

Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.

Sexual assault evidence samples require the use of a specific process known as a differential digestion to separate sperm from nonsperm cells prior to DNA extraction. An automated differential digestion process was developed using a selective degradation technique, which uses DNase I to digest the remaining nonsperm DNA in the sperm fraction. The use of DNase on pristine samples, as well as aged and degraded samples, was assessed to ensure that the quantity and quality of the sperm DNA were not compromised or adversely affected. Samples processed using the selective degradation technique yielded comparable DNA yield and DNA typing data to the conventional differential digestion process. The automated process utilized 96-well plates for high throughput and incorporated microscope slide preparations for confirmation of sperm. It reduced processing time by about sixfold and was paramount in the elimination of the Oakland Police Department Criminalistics Laboratory's sexual assault kit backlog.

A Novel On-Chip Method for Differential Extraction of Sperm in Forensic Cases.

One out of every six American women has been the victim of a sexual assault in their lifetime. However, the DNA casework backlog continues to increase outpacing the nation's capacity since DNA evidence processing in sexual assault casework remains a bottleneck due to laborious and time-consuming differential extraction of victim's and perpetrator's cells. Additionally, a significant amount (60-90%) of male DNA evidence may be lost with existing procedures. Here, a microfluidic method is developed that selectively captures sperm using a unique oligosaccharide sequence (Sialyl-LewisX), a major carbohydrate ligand for sperm-egg binding. This method is validated with forensic mock samples dating back to 2003, resulting in 70-92% sperm capture efficiency and a 60-92% reduction in epithelial fraction. Captured sperm are then lysed on-chip and sperm DNA is isolated. This method reduces assay-time from 8 h to 80 min, providing an inexpensive alternative to current differential extraction techniques, accelerating identification of suspects and advancing public safety.

Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.

To address sexual assault kit backlogs some laboratories in North America have implemented 'Direct to DNA' (DTD) approaches for the examination of relevant vaginal, oral, rectal and external genitalia swabs from sexual assault examination kits. Using this approach no preliminary serological screening for semen or spermatozoa is performed. Instead, swabs are directly subjected to differential extraction and quantitation using a dual quantification system. Decisions regarding the next steps in processing each sample are typically based on the quantity of male DNA detected, the fraction in which it is detected, and its ratio to the total human DNA in the sample. In the absence of serological results it remains of value in many cases to determine whether spermatozoa are present in the sample and whether the male DNA profile may be attributed to this body fluid. In this study we examine the distribution of male DNA from various body fluids between epithelial and spermatozoa fractions following differential extraction. Based on these results we identified criteria under which a DNA profile can be reliably attributed to spermatozoa. A total of 18 blood samples, 129 saliva samples, and 78 semen samples were processed. The maximum amount of male DNA observed in the sperm fraction of a spermatozoa-free sample was 10.4 ng and the maximum portion of total male DNA observed in the sperm fraction was 7.7%. In contrast, when a sample contained spermatozoa the minimum portion of total male DNA observed in the sperm fraction was 52.6%. This research supports a 50% threshold of male DNA in the sperm fraction following differential extraction as a conservative criterion under which the scientist at the Centre of Forensic Sciences (CFS) may infer that spermatozoa is present in a sample in the absence of serological results. This general threshold is applicable to all sample types (underwear, clothing, swabs, condoms) tested. We further demonstrate that, if the same male DNA profile is represented more prominently in the sperm fraction versus the epithelial fraction, the analyst should not fall into the intuitive trap of inferring the presence of spermatozoa in the sample. Instead, enrichment calculations must be based on the measured quantity of male and total DNA in each fraction and not the male:female DNA ratios observed in the DNA profiles.

Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.

The efficacy of a DNA differential extraction procedure relies on reducing the amount of non-sperm female DNA carryover into the sperm fraction, while providing a sufficient recovery of male DNA from the sperm cell component. A standard approach to this extraction is to use a mild initial lysis step to digest the female (epithelial cell) component in the mixture, followed by a series of centrifugation and wash steps to further purify the resulting sperm-pellet fraction. This sperm fraction is then digested in the presence of a chemical reducing agent in preparation for DNA extraction. This method has been employed with relatively few changes since its introduction in the mid-1980s, despite numerous attempts to develop new or improved procedures. In this report, we demonstrate that it is possible to improve the efficacy of the standard differential extraction by applying simple modifications that can reduce the amount of female DNA carryover into the sperm fraction, with no adverse effects on the recovery of male DNA. In one modification, the addition of a second mild lysis step at the beginning of the differential extraction procedure improved the average male-to-female DNA ratio in the sperm fraction by 3- to 6-fold. In another modification, a "tube transfer" step was added to move the re-suspended sperm pellet to a new tube for the second mild lysis and subsequent wash steps. With this modification, the average male-to-female DNA ratio in the sperm fraction was improved by 4- to 90-fold, relative to results obtained for the non-modified differential extraction method. These modifications may be accomplished using tools and reagents that are already present in most forensic DNA laboratories, so that implementation should be relatively low-cost and practical.

Enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution of sexual offense samples using the DEPArray™ system.

The interpretation of DNA mixtures remains a significant challenge in the analysis of forensic evidence. The ability to selectively identify, collect, and analyze single cells or groups of cells has wide implications in the analysis of forensic samples and the subsequent deconvolution of DNA mixtures, particularly in the processing and interpretation of sexual offense evidence where the deconvolution of heterogeneous sources is essential. Single cell separation technology can be used to address this mixture separation challenge, specifically using the DEPArray™ system from Menarini Silicon Biosystems. We propose that the DEPArray™ will enable enhancements to the standard workflow for forensic biology/DNA analytical laboratories. We have demonstrated that the DEPArray™ workflow will lead to fewer mixture samples, enable purification of sperm and epithelial cell fractions without the need for differential extraction, improve the amplification success rate of samples and improve the interpretation of low template DNA samples. Sperm profiles were identified in 27 of 32 DEPArray™ processed samples, with 26 of 27 (96.2%) yielding single source profiles. In contrast, single source profiles were obtained from 9 of 28 (32.1%) differentially extracted samples. The use of the DEPArray™ also eliminates the need for additional confirmatory tests for the presence of human sperm and permits direct identification of the type and number of cells being analyzed eliminating the need for qPCR-based DNA quantification.