Increasing Severity of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency Correlates With the Degree of Proximal Ulnar Hypoplasia.

PURPOSE: Classification systems and treatment for children with radial longitudinal deficiency are classically focused on the hand and wrist. However, the elbow can affect the function of these patients secondary to stiffness or instability. The objective of this study was to determine if a correlation exists between severity of radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) and degree of proximal ulnar hypoplasia. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed at a pediatric hospital. One hundred elbows were identified in 72 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Measurements such as the coronoid height, olecranon coronoid angle (OCA), and the anterior coverage index were obtained from lateral radiographs of children with RLD. Ten elbows had posterior subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint radiographically. Eleven patients had thrombocytopenia absent radius (TAR) syndrome. RESULTS: There was a significant mean difference for OCA between RLD types. Type 4 RLD (mean [M] = 17.9; standard deviation [SD] = 11.3) had a significantly lower OCA than type 0 (M = 26.4; SD = 5.9) and type 1 (M = 31.0; SD = 5.0). A subanalysis of the 58 elbows with type 4 RLD demonstrated that those with TAR (n = 11) had significantly higher anterior coverage index total scores (M = 1.7; SD = 0.3) than those with type 4 without TAR (M = 1.5; SD = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of proximal ulnar hypoplasia is correlated with increasing severity of RLD, with significantly lower OCA and coronoid height observed in the elbow radiographs of patients with type 4 RLD compared with type 0 and type 1. Children with TAR have less proximal ulnar dysplasia and higher anterior coverage index than children with type 4 RLD without associated TAR. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts.

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

Comparing internal and external stabilization for traumatic elbow instability: a systematic review.

Background: Despite surgical reestablishment of the supporting structures, instability may often persist in traumatic elbow injury. In these cases, a temporary internal or external fixator may be indicated to unload the repaired structures and maintain joint concentricity. Aggregate data are needed to characterize the risk of complication between external fixation (ExFix) and the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) when used for traumatic elbow instability. Our objective was to review the literature to compare the complication profile between external fixation and the IJS. Methods: A database query was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome characteristics for eligibility were the following: for patients over 18 years clinical outcomes were compared between an ExFix or the IJS for acute or chronic elbow instability. The Cochran risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions and grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation framework were compiled for risk of bias and quality assessment. Results: The rate of recurrent instability was 4.1% in the IJS group (N = 171) and 7.0% in the ExFix group (N = 435), with an odds ratio of 1.93 (95% confidence interval 0.88-4.23). The rate of device failure was 4.4% in the IJS group and 4.1% in the ExFix group. Pin-related complications occurred in 14.6% of ExFix cases. Complications in the IJS group were the following: 1 case of inflammatory reaction, 4 cases of post removal surgical site infection, and 5 symptomatic removals. Discussion: The literature demonstrates a distinct difference in complication profile between external fixation and the IJS when used as treatment for traumatic elbow instability. Although not statistically significant, the higher rate of recurrent instability following external fixation may be clinically important. The high rate of pin-related complications with external fixation is notable.

A Novel Surgical Treatment Management Algorithm for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI) Based on the Common Extensor Origin Integrity.

Background: Here, we introduce a comprehensive treatment algorithm for posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow, a condition affecting elbow mobility. We outline a diagnostic approach and a novel surgical management plan through the arthroscopic surgeon's point of view. Methods: The central focus of this management approach is the integrity of common extensor origin (CEO). High clinical suspicion must be evident to diagnose PLRI. Special clinical and imaging tests can confirm PLRI but sometimes the final confirmation is established during the arthroscopic treatment. The most appropriate treatment is determined by the degree of CEO integrity. Results: The treatment strategy varies with the CEO's condition: intact or minor tears require arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication, while extensive tears may need plication reinforced with imbrication or, in cases of retraction, a triceps tendon autograft reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament alongside CEO repair. These approaches aim to manage residual instability and are complemented using a tailored rehabilitation protocol to optimize functional outcomes. Conclusion: PLRI is a unique clinical condition and should be treated likewise. This algorithm offers valuable insights for diagnosing and treating PLRI, enhancing therapeutic decision-making.

Bridge Plating is an Effective Adjunct Treatment for Complex Elbow Instability.

BACKGROUND: Managing persistent elbow instability and chronic dislocations presents challenges despite traditional treatments. Supplementary methods like immobilization and various fixations, though common, can carry high complication rates. This study assesses the efficacy of bridge plating in treating complex elbow instability through a retrospective review of patients. Data on characteristics, treatment duration, range of motion, complications, and evaluation scores were analyzed, providing insights into outcomes complications associated with bridge plating. RESULTS: Eleven patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 80 ± 68 weeks. postoperatively. The average age was 53±14 years and there were 5 females and 6 males. The average BMI was 38. Bridge plating was used for a spectrum of complex elbow injuries. The average time from injury to bridge plating in acute cases was 29±19 days and 344±381 days in chronic cases. The average duration of bridge plating was 121 ± 72 days. At the time of plate removal, mean intraoperative elbow motion was extension 58±12°, flexion 107±14°, supination 66±23° and pronation 60±26°. At the latest follow-up visit, average elbow motion was extension 37±22°, Flexion 127± 17°, supination 72±15° and pronation 63±18°. There were 6 complications (55%); heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, wound failure over the plate in a thin patient, an ulnar shaft peri-prosthetic fracture due to a seizure induced fall, and elbow subluxation despite bridge plate fixation. One patient sustained a fracture of a 3.5mm locking bridge plate. One patient required a contracture release for persistent stiffness. Four of these complications can be directly attributed to the use of the bridge plate (36%). At final follow-up, the average patient rated elbow evaluation score was 34, with 0 indicating no pain and disability. The average single assessment numeric evaluation score was 66% for the 8 patients who had this available, with 100% being the best possible attainable score. CONCLUSION: Bridge plating effectively maintains joint reduction in selected complex elbow instability cases. However, patients with bridge plates often require a second surgery for removal and experience high rates of general complications due to the complexity of their condition.

The internal joint stabilizer for elbow instability: current concepts.

The management of residual elbow instability is challenging in both acute and chronic injuries. Among the available devices, the hinged external fixator provides an additional joint stabilization while allowing an early motion, but it is clumsy and associated to high rate of pin track complications. To address these issues, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) has been recently developed. An easier recreation of the axis of rotation coupled to the reduced lever arm of the hinge is the root of the consistent and satisfactory results thus far observed. In addition, the device is more comfortable for the patients being an internal stabilizer. Nonetheless, a second surgery for the device removal is necessary, of which the timing is still not standardized. This current concepts paper describes literature regarding outcomes of the IJS focusing on the rate of maintained radiographic joint reduction, the resultant range of motion, and the associated complication profile.

Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using the Triceps Brachii Fascia for Posterolateral Rotatory Instability in Cubitus Varus: A Report of Two Cases.

A combination of osteotomy and ligament reconstruction is recommended for posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) with large cubitus varus deformities. There is a lack of reports regarding ligament donor selection for ligament reconstruction of PLRI with cubitus varus. Two cases of PLRI with cubitus varus have been described. In case one, a 40-year-old woman presented with left elbow pain. She had a cubitus varus deformity, resulting from a childhood elbow fracture. Radiographs showed an 18-degree cubitus varus deformity. A lateral closing wedge osteotomy and double plate osteosynthesis were performed. The lateral collateral ligament (LCL) was reconstructed with autologous triceps fascia. Postoperative radiographs confirmed correction with 10 degrees of the carrying angle (CA). Bone union at the osteotomy site occurred six months later with excellent results. In case two, a 45-year-old man presented an arm with persistent right elbow instability with cubitus varus deformity. This was due to a childhood supracondylar fracture of the right humerus. Radiographs showed a cubitus varus deformity of 25 degrees on the right. The surgical procedure included a lateral wedge osteotomy, double plate fixation, and LCL reconstruction with autologous triceps fascia. Postoperative radiographs confirmed a corrected CA of 5 degrees. Bone union was achieved at the six-month follow-up with satisfactory results. The use of triceps fascia for LCL reconstruction for PLRI due to cubitus varus would provide a minimally invasive and reasonable treatment option.

The Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Biomechanical Evidence.

Purpose: The goal of surgical management for unstable elbow injuries is the restoration of joint concentricity and stability. After internal fixation, concerns may exist regarding instability or durability of the fixation construct. Historically, these scenarios were treated with options such as transarticular pinning or external fixation. Recently, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) that allows postoperative mobilization was introduced. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to aggregate the clinical and biomechanical evidence for the IJS of the elbow. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was performed, following the PRISMA guidelines. The search results were narrowed from 2015 through 2023 to coincide with the inception of the device being reviewed. Results: A total of nine retrospective reports on the IJS (N = 171) cases at a mean follow-up of 10.8 months were included. The pooled rate of implant failure was 4.4%, and recurrent instability was 4.1%. Additionally, the we included seven case reports and two biomechanical reports. Conclusions: The aggregate literature describes satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and device failure for the IJS of the elbow. The limited biomechanical investigations conclude efficacy for stability profiles. Clinical relevance: Across a spectrum of unstable elbow cases, the IJS prevented recurrent instability during the early postoperative period. Notably, the device requires an additional procedure for removal, and the long-term impact of the retained devices is currently unclear.

Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW). RESULTS: Early mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Anconeus-sparing minimally invasive approach for lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a triceps tendon autograft is an effective and safe treatment for chronic posterolateral instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment helps to restore stability of the elbow in patients with posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). The anconeus muscle is one of the most important active stabilizers against PLRI. A minimally invasive anconeus-sparing approach for lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction using a triceps tendon autograft has been previously described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of this intervention and identify risk factors that influenced the clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with chronic PLRI and no previous elbow surgery who underwent surgical reconstruction of the LUCL using a triceps tendon autograft in a minimally invasive anconeus-sparing approach during 2012 and 2018 were evaluated. Outcome measures included a clinical examination and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaires. Subjective patient outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Subjective Elbow Value (SEV). Integrity of the common extensor tendons and centering of the radial head were assessed preoperatively on standardized magnetic resonance images (MRIs). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were available at final follow-up. The mean age of patients was 51 ± 12 years with a mean follow-up of 53 ± 14 months (range 20-76). Clinical examination after surgery (n = 41) showed no clinical signs of instability in 98% of the patients (P < .001) and a nonsignificant improvement in range of motion. OES, MEPS, and VAS scores averaged 40 ± 10 of 48 points, 92 ± 12 of 100 points, and 1 ± 2 points, respectively, all corresponding with good or excellent outcomes. The SEV was 88%, indicating very high satisfaction with the surgery. Only 1 patient had revision surgery due to pain, and there were no reported postoperative complications in this cohort. A radial head subluxation in the MRI correlated significantly with worse postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The anconeus-sparing minimally invasive technique for posterolateral stabilization of the elbow using a triceps tendon autograft is an effective and safe treatment for chronic posterolateral instability of the elbow with substantial improvements in elbow function and pain relief with a very low rate of persistent clinical instability.

Paediatric bilateral 'floating elbow'.

A child sustained an ipsilateral supracondylar humerus (SCH) and distal both-bone forearm fractures bilaterally, in addition to facial injuries, following a fall from height. He was managed surgically by closed reduction and pinning for both SCH and distal end radius fractures bilaterally. At the final follow-up, all the fractures had united uneventfully, and he had no functional limitations or cosmetic concerns. We conclude that a floating elbow in the paediatric population is an uncommon injury, and the bilateral scenario is even rarer. One should be vigilant for compartment syndrome; early surgical fixation may give better results.

Arthroscopic assessment for lateral collateral ligament complex deficiency of the elbow: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy. METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: intact; Stage 1: the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2: the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3: the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow. RESULTS: The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1: P = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ (P = .157). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.

The posterolateral ligament of the elbow: anatomy and clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: The posterolateral capsule was recognized in the past as an important structure for elbow stability but was later disregarded. Two recent biomechanical studies demonstrated its role in preventing posterolateral instability, and thus it should be identified as a distinct ligament: the posterolateral ligament (PLL). This study includes 2 parts: an anatomic study of the PLL's footprint and a collection of 5 cases of pathologic lesions of the PLL. METHODS: Six cadaveric upper limbs were assessed. The attachments of the PLL were dissected, the footprints were marked and photographed, and the 2-dimensional area and length were measured. RESULTS: The mean proximal attachment dimensions were a length of 13 mm and an area of 101 mm2, and the mean distal attachment dimensions were 19 mm and 111 mm2, respectively. There were 2 cases of posterolateral elbow pain in professional cricket bowlers, diagnosed radiographically as enthesopathy of the PLL's proximal attachment on the posterior capitellum, probably due to repeated forced hyperextension of the elbow. Both patients were treated by débridement of the posterior capitellum and reattachment of the PLL, with complete resolution of symptoms. In addition, there were 3 cases of clinical posterolateral rotatory instability in young patients. Two athletes had an isolated acute tear of the PLL, and on physical examination, both had positive posterior draw test results but negative pivot-shift test results. Both underwent elbow arthroscopy and repair of the PLL with resolution of symptoms. The third patient had long-standing recurrent elbow instability, following a failed lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, in the presence of an Osborne-Cotterill lesion. He underwent revision lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, bone grafting of the bony lesion, and reattachment of the PLL, with complete resolution of symptomatic posterolateral rotatory instability. CONCLUSIONS: The PLL of the elbow has a significant role in the elbow's posterolateral stability. Its footprints were described, and its clinical significance was demonstrated in cases of elbow instability caused by acute ligament tears and elbow pain due to ligament enthesopathy. Surgeons should be aware of this structure and potential pathology related to its injury.

Postoperative Elbow Instability: Options for Revision Stabilization.

Persistent and recurrent postoperative elbow instability includes a spectrum of pathologies ranging from joint incongruity and subluxation to dislocation. Restoration of osseous anatomy, particularly the coronoid, is a priority in restoring elbow alignment and maintaining ulnohumeral joint stability. After managing bony deficiencies, soft-tissue and ligamentous structures are typically addressed. When required, both static and dynamic adjunctive stabilization procedures have been described, which aid in maintaining a concentric reduction. In these complex procedures, both complication avoidance and early recognition of postoperative complications assist in obtaining a good result. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for revision stabilization for patients with persistent and recurrent elbow subluxation or dislocation after primary stabilization.

Static stability of novel uncemented elbow hemiarthroplasty stabilized with ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to create a model to simulate treatment of unreconstructable distal humerus fractures with hemiarthroplasty. Stability was restored with a latest plate-system that simultaneously tensions medial and lateral collateral ligament grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Static varus and valgus elbow stability was tested in 11 cadaver elbows with intact ligaments and capsule at 5 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°). The elbows were then destabilized via release of all ligaments and capsular attachments. The distal humerus articular cartilage was excised and replaced with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Ligament reconstruction was subsequently performed, and elbow stability was measured and compared to the native state. Dimensions of the hemiarthroplasty component were compared to native elbow dimensions to assess and quantify any existing relationship to elbow stability. RESULTS: A hemiarthroplasty was implanted in all specimens. A size mismatch occurred between the distal humerus trochlea and the olecranon fossa in all specimens and averaged 6.3 mm. Following ligament reconstruction, specimens reproduced the flexion angle-dependent stability of native elbows to both varus and valgus stress. On the medial side, elbow joint stability in mid-flexion was approximately 7% tighter after hemiarthroplasty. Laterally, the elbow was approximately 15% tighter after hemiarthroplasty and demonstrated peak stability in full flexion. The 3 assessed hemiarthroplasty components and bony dimensions did not exhibit any relationship between implant-bone mismatch and elbow stability after ligamentous reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Cadaveric elbow specimens underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty with soft tissue stabilization with a novel technique for ligament reconstruction. Following hemiarthroplasty and ligament reconstruction, these specimens maintained secure fixation between ligament and bone. Static stability was maintained at varying degrees of elbow flexion regardless of variable mismatch between the hemiarthroplasty component and the native olecranon fossa.

Lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction enhancing secondary stabilizers in chronic PLRI of the elbow provides good to excellent clinical results with no recurrent instability.

PURPOSE: The adopted treatment for chronic elbow PLRI is lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. However, the most frequently reported complication after primary reconstruction is recurrent instability - up to 25 %. It was thus hypothesized that enhancing the secondary stabilizers will provide successful results with a lower rate of recurrent instability in comparison to techniques with primary reconstruction only. This study aimed to demonstrate a novel surgical technique involving secondary stabilizers. METHODS: In this retrospective study of 29 cases with chronic PLRI the mean duration of symptoms was 39.6 ± 4.9 months. The mean age was 47.9 years with mainly male patients. The surgeries were performed by one senior surgeon at a single institution. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 36.8 ± 7.7 months. The MEPS score improved significantly from 59.8 ± 13.1 to 84.7 ± 7.6 (p < 0.001). 23/29 patients (79.2 %) had converted to good and excellent results (MEPS >75 points). The DASH score improved from 40.8 ± 4.6 to 20.9 ± 7.2 (p < 0.001). The total complication rate was 10.3 % (N = 3). No recurrent instability was recorded in comparison to 12.2 % for primary reconstruction only, as reported in the literature (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Enhancing the secondary stabilizers by utilizing an adjacently located autograft provided good and excellent results with no recurrent instability. This novel surgical procedure is easy to reproduce and provides a safe and reliable alternative in cases of chronic PLRI when compared to techniques with primary reconstruction only.

Terrible triad injury of the elbow: a spectrum of theories.

For more than one century, understanding the injury mechanism leading to the terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) was a significant challenge for surgeons. We aimed to summarize: (1) the history of the treatment of TTE and (2) the increasing scientific knowledge that supported its evolution. Five electronic databases were searched between 1920 and 2022. Results were reported as a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. Between 1940 and 1980, surgical exploration allowed observation of complex elbow instability involving both radial head, coronoid process, and ligament(s) injuries. In 1966, Osborne introduced the concept of posterolateral rotatory instability as the first mechanism injury to explain the complex elbow instability. From 1980 to 1995, a biomechanical revolution by American pioneers critically improved our understanding of elbow instability. After 1992, a few unifying theories and surgical protocols were provided, but those have divided the surgeons' population. The formalization of the TTE treatment allowed avoiding of terrible short-term outcomes. However, post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) at long-term follow-up is still an issue. No consensual surgical protocol for the treatment of TTE has been widely accepted. While the outcomes of the TTE have been improved, the rate of PTOA at long-term follow-up is still high regardless of the treatments. The terrible triad has given way to the subtle triad with persistent microinstability of the elbow. The next challenge for elbow surgeons is to diagnose and fix this persistent subclinical instability after surgery in order to prevent the onset of PTOA.

Intraoperative arthroscopic classification tool for posterolateral elbow instability.

Background: Introducing and implementing an arthroscopic classification tool for posterolateral elbow instability. Methods: Thirty arthroscopies were performed on 30 patients, and all recordings were collected, blinded, and labeled. Three orthopedic surgeons reviewed and scored all 30 recordings three times with a period of at least seven days in between to analyze the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. The classification consisted of five different grades. Results: Indications for elbow arthroscopy included impingement (n = 7), osteochondritis dissecans (n = 5), pain (n = 7), osteoarthritis (n = 6), and other (n = 5). The kappa value for intrarater reliability was 0.71, indicating good reliability, while the kappa value for inter-rater reliability was 0.38 indicating fair reliability. Conclusion: This new classification is a tool for an arthroscopic assessment of PLRI and can be used as a standardized grading system for further research and communication between orthopedic surgeons. We demonstrated good intrarater reliability (k = 0.71) with fair inter-rater reliability (k = 0.38). However, further research is necessary to study the clinical significance.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Fracture Fixation About the Elbow.

Arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation can be used for some adult elbow fractures. In particular, for articular fractures of the anterior elbow (coronoid/capitellum), elbow arthroscopy can provide excellent visualization of fracture fragments using a less invasive surgical exposure. Meticulous adherence to safe techniques and utilization of specialized equipment can help maximize safety and facilitate reproducible surgical results.