A Case Series of Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Including Extra-articular Manifestations Following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination: A Comprehensive Cytokine Assay.

INTRODUCTION: The administration of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines has played a pivotal role in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, there have been instances of atypical immune reactions to the vaccine, notably among patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). AIM: This study was designed to analyze the cytokine profiles of RA patients who suffered from severe or fatal disease flares after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, to unravel the immunological bases for such responses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study involving three RA patients. These individuals had their disease under control prior to experiencing severe disease flares post-mRNA vaccination. A detailed serum cytokine analysis was carried out and compared with that of a healthy control group. RESULTS: Post-vaccination, each patient displayed a marked cytokine storm, with notably increased levels of IL-1ß (342, 109, and 27.5 pg/mL, respectively), IL-6 (67.8, 82.7, and 201 pg/mL, respectively), IL-17A (172, 51.6, and 30.3 pg/mL, respectively), and TNF-α (279, 97.5, and 59.4 pg/mL, respectively). Two patients responded well to treatment with biological and synthetic DMARDs, including baricitinib and abatacept. Unfortunately, one patient passed away even after receiving tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: The findings from the comprehensive cytokine assays indicate severe cytokine abnormalities, pointing to cytokine storm syndrome. This suggests that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination may trigger a disruption in immune homeostasis, potentially leading to the acute worsening of pulmonary complications in RA patients, even those with previously low disease activity. It's necessary to weigh the risks of severe outcomes from COVID-19 against the potential for flares or other adverse reactions following vaccination. Such risk assessments should take into account the individual patient's health status, existing conditions, and other risk factors. Close follow-up after vaccination is crucial, especially for patients with RA.

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, excess deaths including cancer have become a concern in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for different types of cancer in Japan changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). Official statistics from Japan were used to compare observed annual and monthly AMRs with predicted rates based on pre-pandemic (2010-2019) figures using logistic regression analysis. No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022. AMRs for the four cancers with the most deaths (lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver) showed a decreasing trend until the first year of the pandemic in 2020, but the rate of decrease slowed in 2021 and 2022. This study discusses possible explanations for these increases in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates.

Rare COVID-19 vaccine side effects got lost in the shuffle. Primary cutaneous lymphomas following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review.

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines are generally safe and effective; however, they are associated with various vaccine-induced cutaneous side effects. Several reported cases of primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) following the COVID-19 vaccination have raised concerns about a possible association. This systematic review aims to investigate and elucidate the potential link between CLs and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EBSCO and Scopus from January 01, 2019, to March 01, 2023, and analyzed studies based on determined eligibility criteria. The systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA protocol. Results: A total of 12 articles (encompassing 24 patients) were included in this analysis. The majority of CLs were indolent cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) (66,7%; 16/24), with Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) being the most common type (33,3%; 8/24). Most patients (79,2%; 19/24) developed lesions after receiving the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, and predominantly after the first immunization dose (54,2%; 13/24). The presented CLs cases exhibited a tendency to exacerbate following subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations. Nevertheless, CLs were characterized by a favorable course, leading to remission in most cases. Conclusion: The available literature suggests an association between the occurrence and exacerbation of CLs with immune stimulation following COVID-19 vaccination. We hypothesize that post-vaccine CLs result from an interplay between cytokines and disrupted signaling pathways triggered by vaccine components, concurrently playing a pivotal role in the pathomechanism of CLs. However, establishing a definitive causal relationship between these events is currently challenging, primarily due to the relatively low rate of reported post-vaccine CLs. Nonetheless, these cases should not be disregarded, and patients with a history of lymphoproliferative disorders require post-COVID-19 vaccination monitoring to control the disease's course.Systematic review registrationwww.researchregistry.com, identifier [1723].

Long-term immunogenicity and safety of heterologous boosting with a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (SYS6006) in Chinese participants who had received two or three doses of inactivated vaccine.

The emerging new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) needs booster vaccination. We evaluated the long-term safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boosting with a SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine SYS6006. A total of 1000 participants aged 18 years or more who had received two (Group A) or three (Group B) doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine were enrolled and vaccinated with one dose of SYS6006 which was designed based on the prototype spike protein and introduced mutation sites. Adverse events (AEs) through 30 days and serious AEs during the study were collected. Live-virus and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (Nab), binding antibody (immunoglobulin G [IgG]) and cellular immunity were tested through 180 days. Solicited all, injection-site and systemic AEs were reported by 618 (61.8%), 498 (49.8%), and 386 (38.6%) participants, respectively. Most AEs were grade 1. The two groups had similar safety profile. No vaccination-related SAEs were reported. Robust wild-type (WT) live-virus Nab response was elicited with peak geometric mean titers (GMTs) of 3769.5 (Group A) and 5994.7 (Group B) on day 14, corresponding to 1602.5- and 290.8-fold increase versus baseline, respectively. The BA.5 live-virus Nab GMTs were 87.7 (Group A) and 93.2 (Group B) on day 14. All participants seroconverted for WT live-virus Nab. Robust pseudovirus Nab and IgG responses to wild type and BA.5 were also elicited. ELISpot assay showed robust cellular immune response, which was not obviously affected by virus variation. In conclusion, SYS6006 heterologous boosting demonstrated long-term good safety and immunogenicity in participants who had received two or three doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine.

An Elderly Patient Developed Ulcerative Colitis after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

An 86-year-old man presented to our hospital with symptoms of diarrhea and bloody stool, which had manifested two weeks after receiving his third severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 mRNA vaccination. Colonoscopy revealed diffuse, rough-surfaced mucosa extending from the ascending colon to the rectum. Despite attempting probiotic treatment, the patient's condition did not improve, leading to admission. Endoscopic findings at admission worsened. Based on endoscopic and histopathological findings, the patient was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylic acid were administered, and the clinical symptoms improved. Subsequently, the disease worsened during steroid tapering, and filgotinib was added, leading to steroid-free remission.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Response in People Living with HIV According to CD4 Count and CD4/CD8 Ratio.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to estimate the rates of not achieving a robust/above-average humoral response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH) who received ≥2 doses and to investigate the role of the CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting the humoral response. METHODS: We evaluated the humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 response 1-month after the second and third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine as a proportion of not achieving a robust/above-average response using two criteria: (i) a humoral threshold identified as a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 (<90% vaccine efficacy): anti-RBD < 775 BAU/mL or anti-S < 298 BAU/mL, (ii) threshold of binding antibodies equivalent to average neutralization activity from the levels of binding (nAb titer < 1:40): anti-RBD < 870 BAU/mL or anti-S < 1591 BAU/mL. PLWH were stratified according to the CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio at first dose. Logistic regression was used to compare the probability of not achieving robust/above-average responses. A mixed linear model was used to estimate the mean anti-RBD titer at various time points across the exposure groups. RESULTS: a total of 1176 PLWH were included. The proportions of participants failing to achieve a robust/above-average response were significantly higher in participants with a lower CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio, specifically, a clearer gradient was observed for the CD4 count. The CD4 count was a better predictor of the humoral response of the primary cycle than ratio. The third dose was pivotal in achieving a robust/above-average humoral response, at least for PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/mm3 and a ratio > 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: A robust humoral response after a booster dose has not been reached by 50% of PLWH with CD4 < 200 cells mm3. In the absence of a validated correlate of protections in the Omicron era, the CD4 count remains the most solid marker to guide vaccination campaigns in PLWH.

New-onset Immune-mediated Necrotizing Myopathy and Trigeminal Neuropathy after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Sjögren's Syndrome.

We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome treated with adalimumab who developed immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and trigeminal neuropathy after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination. Trigeminal neuralgia and elevated serum creatine kinase levels emerged 12 days post-vaccination, followed by myalgia in the femoral muscles. IMNM was histologically diagnosed. The pathogenesis may involve molecular mimicry between the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and autologous tissues triggered by vaccination. This case emphasizes the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, IMNM, and trigeminal neuropathy, as well as the importance of monitoring immune-mediated adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune disease.

Effect of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine on ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines developed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between July and December 2022 in a tertiary care hospital affiliated with a university. A total of 117 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (n = 62) consisted of women of reproductive age who received two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine administered 21 days apart. The control group (n = 55) included women with the same demographic characteristics who did not plan to be vaccinated. Hormonal values and basal antral follicle count were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 26.3 ± 3.6 years, and the mean age of the control group was 25.4 ± 6.2 years (p = 0.332). In the vaccinated group, mean follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) on day 2 was 5.29 ± 2.28; luteinizing hormone (LH): 5.18 ± 1.3; E2: 46.43 ± 24.51; anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): 4.17 ± 2.1; antral follicle count: 16.23 ± 8.04; right ovarian volume: 6.4 ± 1.7; left ovarian volume: 6.2 ± 2.1. FSH measured at D2 in the control group was 5.68 ± 1.89; LH: 5.22 ± 2.2; E2: 48.41 ± 27.12; AMH: 4.30 ± 1.74; number of antral follicles: 15.64 ± 9.04; right ovarian volume: 6.1 ± 1.8; left ovarian volume: 6.3 ± 1.4. There were no statistically significant differences for FSH, LH, E2, AMH, ovarian volume, and number of antral follicles on the second day of menstruation between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the present study, the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine does not affect the ovarian reserve of patients.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine on arthritis condition in rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine has been reported to cause various adverse reactions, including the development or exacerbation of autoimmune diseases, but the adverse reactions and the effects of the vaccines on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain unknown. We therefore investigated the arthritis condition in RA patients after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods: RA patients who visited our hospital from January to April 2022 completed a questionnaire regarding adverse reactions to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We compared the frequency and duration of post-vaccination arthralgia between RA patients and health care workers in our hospital. For the RA patients who reported post-vaccination arthralgia, we collected medical records for the 6 months after vaccination. Results: Of the 1198 vaccinated RA patients, 256 (21.4%) had systemic inflammatory symptoms, 18 (1.5%) had allergies including urticaria and asthma, and 37 (3.1%) had arthralgia. A few patients had extra-articular manifestations such as acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease. Compared with health care workers, RA patients more frequently developed arthralgia, and the arthralgia was longer lasting than that in controls: only 9 (0.8%) of the 1117 health care workers reported arthralgia, and all cases resolved within 3 days. Data from 31 of the 37 RA patients with post-vaccination arthralgia were further analyzed; in these patients, disease activity was highest after 2 months, and 10 patients required additional DMARDs within 6 months. The proportion of concomitant use of PSL at vaccination was higher in these patients. No patients on biological DMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs prior to vaccination needed additional DMARDs or a change of regimen. Conclusion: RA patients had more frequent and longer-lasting arthralgia after vaccination than healthy subjects, and one-third of patients with post-vaccination arthralgia required additional DMARDs. Although the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine was administered safely in most RA patients, in some patients RA symptoms may worsen after vaccination.

Acute cholangitis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster in a patient receiving an anti-amyloid antibody for Alzheimer's disease: A case report.

A 77-year-old woman had 2 weeks of fever and flu-like symptoms starting several hours after receiving an mRNA booster for SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza vaccine, in separate shots. Laboratory tests showed cholangitis. Medical history included APOE-ε4 carrier genotype, mild Alzheimer's disease, participation in a clinical trial of aducanumab, and resolving polymyalgia rheumatica. The patient recovered with at-home supportive care. She had aducanumab-associated amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) both before and after the acute cholangitis. Two months following the vaccinations polymyalgia rheumatica recurred. This case raises questions about interactions among immune-mediated disease, complications of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, and adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Safety and efficacy of one and two booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in kidney transplant recipients: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients are at risk for a severe course of COVID-19 with a high mortality rate. A considerable number of patients remains without a satisfactory serological response after the baseline and adjuvant SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of one and two booster doses of mRNA vaccines (either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) in 125 COVID-19 naive, adult kidney transplant recipients who showed an insufficient humoral response (SARS-CoV-2 IgG <10 AU/ml) to the previous 2-dose vaccination schedule. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of a positive antibody response (SARS-CoV-2 IgG ≥10 AU/ml) between one and two booster doses at 1 month after the final booster dose. RESULTS: A positive humoral response was observed in 36 (62%) patients receiving two booster doses and in 28 (44%) patients receiving one booster dose (odds ratio [OR], 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-4.34, p = .043). Moreover, median SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were higher with two booster doses (p = .009). The number of patients with positive virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) levels was numerically higher with two booster doses compared to one booster dose, but without statistical significance (66% vs. 50%, p = .084). There was no significant difference in positive seroconversions rate and antibody levels between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2. CONCLUSION: A higher number of kidney transplant recipients achieved a positive antibody response after two booster doses compared to one booster dose.

Effect of biologic therapy on the humoral immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with asthma.

The effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and biologics on the humoral immune response following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination in patients with asthma is unknown. We prospectively evaluated the humoral immune response 3 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) after the second dose of BNT162b2 in 30 SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients with asthma. We measured anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers and serum-neutralizing activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain. The anti-spike IgG titer and neutralizing activity did not differ significantly between the biologics and non-biologics groups at T1 (P = 0.708 and P = 0.417, respectively) or T2 (P = 0.299 and P = 0.492, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age and sex were significantly associated with the magnitude of the humoral immune response; however, the use of biologics and ICS dose were not, suggesting that these would not affect BNT162b2 immunogenicity in patients with asthma. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Cluster Analysis Identifies Distinct Patterns of T-Cell and Humoral Immune Responses Evolution Following a Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in People Living with HIV.

(1) Background: Many vaccines require higher, additional doses or adjuvants to provide adequate protection for people living with HIV (PLWH). Despite their potential risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019, immunological data remain sparse, and a clear consensus for the best booster strategy is lacking. (2) Methods: Using the data obtained from our previous study assessing prospective T-cell and humoral immune responses before and after administration of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, we assessed the correlations between immune parameters reflecting humoral and cellular immune responses. We further aimed at identifying distinct clusters of patients with similar patterns of immune response evolution to determine how these relate to demographic and clinical factors. (3) Results: Among 80 PLWH and 51 healthcare workers (HCWs) enrolled in the study, cluster analysis identified four distinct patterns of evolution characterised by specific immune patterns and clinical factors. We observed that immune responses appeared to be less robust in cluster A, whose individuals were mostly PLWH who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cluster C, whose individuals showed a particularly drastic increase in markers of humoral immune response following the third dose of vaccine, was mainly composed of female participants who experienced SARS-CoV-2. Regarding the correlation study, although we observed a strong positive correlation between markers mirroring humoral immune response, markers of T-cell response following vaccination correlated only in a lesser extent with markers of humoral immunity. This suggests that neutralising antibody titers alone are not always a reliable reflection of the magnitude of the whole immune response. (4) Conclusions: Our findings show heterogeneity in immune responses among SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated PLWH. Specific subgroups could therefore benefit from distinct immunization strategies. Prior or breakthrough natural infection enhances the activity of vaccines and must be taken into account for informing global vaccine strategies among PLWH, even those with a viro-immunologically controlled infection.

Immunity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in autoimmune neurological disorders treated with rituximab or ocrelizumab.

Background: Rituximab (RTX) and ocrelizumab (OCR), B cell-depleting therapy targeting CD20 molecules, affect the humoral immune response after vaccination. How these therapies influence T-cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 after immunization remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: Patients with MS (83), NMOSD (19), or MG (7) undergoing RTX (n=47) or OCR (n=62) treatment were vaccinated twice with the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Antibodies were quantified using the SARS-CoV-2 IgG chemiluminescence immunoassay, targeting the spike protein. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were quantified by interferon γ release assays (IGRA). The responses were evaluated at two different time points (4-8 weeks and 16-20 weeks following the 2nd dose of the vaccine). Immunocompetent vaccinated individuals (n=41) were included as controls. Results: Almost all immunocompetent controls developed antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein, but only 34.09% of the patients, without a COVID-19 history and undergoing anti-CD20 treatment (via RTX or OCR), seroconverted. This antibody response was higher in patients with intervals of longer than 3 weeks between vaccinations. The duration of therapy was significantly shorter in seroconverted patients (median 24 months), than in the non-seroconverted group. There was no correlation between circulating B cells and the levels of antibodies. Even patients with a low proportion of circulating CD19+ B cells (<1%, 71 patients) had detectable SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses. SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response measured by released interferon γ was detected in 94.39% of the patients, independently of a humoral immune response. Conclusion: The majority of MS, MG, and NMOSD patients developed a SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response. The data suggest that vaccination can induce SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in a portion of anti-CD20 treated patients. The seroconversion rate was higher in OCR-treated patients compared to those on RTX. The response represented by levels of antibodies was better in individuals, with intervals of longer than 3 weeks between vaccinations.

[Analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers after mRNA booster vaccination in patients with nonmalignant hematological disorders].

In our facility, anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were given to 21 patients, including 8 with aplastic anemia (AA), 3 with pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), and 10 with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and IgG antibody titers were assessed one month after vaccinations. After receiving both a second vaccine and a booster shot, all patients with AA/PRCA treated with cyclosporine A aside from one, had IgG titers that were lower than the median levels of healthy controls. Even if prednisolone (PSL) doses did not go over 10 mg/day, ITP patients receiving PSL therapy were unable to achieve adequate levels of IgG after booster immunizations.

Characteristics of patients with hematologic malignancies without seroconversion post-COVID-19 third vaccine dosing.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to explore the characteristics of the subset of patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) who had little to no change in SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody index value levels after a third mRNA vaccine dose (3V) and to compare the cohort of patients who did and did not seroconvert post-3V to get a better understanding of the demographics and potential drivers of serostatus. Study design: This retrospective cohort study analyzed SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody index values pre and post the 3V data on 625 patients diagnosed with HM across a large Midwestern United States healthcare system between 31 October 2019 and 31 January 2022. Methods: To assess the association between individual characteristics and seroconversion status, patients were placed into two groups based on IgG antibody status pre and post the 3V dose, (-/+) and (-/-). Odds ratios were used as measures of association for all categorical variables. Logistic regressions were used to measure the association between HM condition and seroconversion. Results: HM diagnosis was significantly associated with seroconversion status (P = 0.0003) with patients non-Hodgkin lymphoma six times the odds of not seroconverting compared with multiple myeloma patients (P = 0.0010). Among the participants who were seronegative prior to 3V, 149 (55.6%) seroconverted after the 3V dose and 119 (44.4%) did not. Conclusion: This study focuses on an important subset of patients with HM who are not seroconverting after the COVID mRNA 3V. This gain in scientific knowledge is needed for clinicians to target and counsel these vulnerable patients.

Neutralizing antibodies to Omicron after the fourth SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose in immunocompromised patients highlight the need of additional boosters.

Introduction: Immunocompromised patients have been shown to have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: Here we compared the B-cell, T-cell and neutralizing antibody response to WT and Omicron BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 virus after the fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies (HM, n=71), solid tumors (ST, n=39) and immune-rheumatological (IR, n=25) diseases. The humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were analyzed by quantifying the anti-RBD antibodies, their neutralization activity and the IFN-γ released after spike specific stimulation. Results: We show that the T-cell response is similarly boosted by the fourth dose across the different subgroups, while the antibody response is improved only in patients not receiving B-cell targeted therapies, independent on the pathology. However, 9% of patients with anti-RBD antibodies did not have neutralizing antibodies to either virus variants, while an additional 5.7% did not have neutralizing antibodies to Omicron BA.2, making these patients particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The increment of neutralizing antibodies was very similar towards Omicron BA.2 and WT virus after the third or fourth dose of vaccine, suggesting that there is no preferential skewing towards either virus variant with the booster dose. The only limited step is the amount of antibodies that are elicited after vaccination, thus increasing the probability of developing neutralizing antibodies to both variants of virus. Discussion: These data support the recommendation of additional booster doses in frail patients to enhance the development of a B-cell response directed against Omicron and/or to enhance the T-cell response in patients treated with anti-CD20.

A child with crescentic glomerulonephritis following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccination.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on kidney complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination, especially in the pediatric population. We report a pediatric case diagnosed with crescentic glomerulonephritis (CrGN) after the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A 16-year-old girl was admitted due to dyspnea and headache approximately 6 weeks after receiving the second SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). She had previously experienced fever, nausea, vomiting, and dyspnea after the first vaccination, which persisted for a week. On admission, her blood pressure was 155/89 mmHg with a 7 kg weight gain in a month. She had microhematuria and proteinuria. Laboratory findings were as follows: blood urea nitrogen/creatinine, 66/9.57 mg/dL; and brain natriuretic peptide, 1,167 pg/mL. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody, and antinuclear antibody findings were negative. Kidney doppler sonography revealed swelling and increased echogenicity of both kidneys with increased resistive index. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging results showed early minimal fibrosis of myocarditis. We then started hemodialysis. Kidney biopsy showed diffuse extra capillary proliferative glomerulonephritis with diffuse crescent formation. We treated the patient with methylprednisolone pulse therapy with subsequent oral steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. Although dialysis was terminated, the patient remained in the chronic kidney disease stage. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case of ANCA-negative CrGN after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in the pediatric population. As children are increasingly vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, monitoring for kidney complications is warranted.

Evaluation of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody levels in coronavirus disease breakthrough infection during immunosuppressive therapy in a patient with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease.

Herein, we report the case of a 67-year-old man with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine breakthrough infection during immunosuppressive therapy for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The patient received glucocorticoids combined with tacrolimus as maintenance therapy. His serum anti-SARS-CoV-2-immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels were extremely low at the onset of COVID-19 pneumonia, even after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2). After treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia, the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies increased. These results indicated a lack of the ability to produce neutralising antibodies from immune cells despite the booster vaccination. Therefore, we suggest that advanced-age patients with CTD-ILD receiving immunosuppressive therapy with polypharmacy require consistent personal protection, vaccination of close caregivers, increased awareness, and booster vaccination. Moreover, we recommend that tacrolimus should be withdrawn for a while after vaccination under controlled conditions.

Humoral and T-Cell Immune Response After 3 Doses of Messenger RNA Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccines in Fragile Patients: The Italian VAX4FRAIL Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with solid or hematological tumors or neurological and immune-inflammatory disorders are potentially fragile subjects at increased risk of experiencing severe coronavirus disease 2019 and an inadequate response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. METHODS: We designed a prospective Italian multicenter study to assess humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients (n = 378) with solid tumors (ST), hematological malignancies (HM), neurological disorders (ND), and immunorheumatological diseases (ID). A group of healthy controls was also included. We analyzed the immunogenicity of the primary vaccination schedule and booster dose. RESULTS: The overall seroconversion rate in patients after 2 doses was 62.1%. Significantly lower rates were observed in HM (52.4%) and ID (51.9%) than in ST (95.6%) and ND (70.7%); a lower median antibody level was detected in HM and ID versus ST and ND (P < .0001). Similar rates of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response were found in all disease groups, with a higher level observed in ND. The booster dose improved the humoral response in all disease groups, although to a lesser extent in HM patients, whereas the T-cell response increased similarly in all groups. In the multivariable logistic model, independent predictors of seroconversion were disease subgroup, treatment type, and age. Ongoing treatment known to affect the immune system was associated with the worst humoral response to vaccination (P < .0001) but had no effect on T-cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive treatment more than disease type per se is a risk factor for a low humoral response after vaccination. The booster dose can improve both humoral and T-cell responses.