RESUMO
Background: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reflects changes in the condition of multiple myeloma (MM) patients to some extent. However, the relationship of ALP in MM remains uncertain. Our study aimed to determine the association between initial ALP levels and overall survival in newly diagnosed MM patients. Methods: Clinical data from 202 newly diagnosed MM patients at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between 2012 and 2016 were collected. Baseline characteristics, disease progression staging, serum markers, and patient survival data were recorded. The cut-off value for ALP was calculated based on patient survival data, and patients were divided into groups. Differences in patients' 3- and 5-year survival rates, liver function, bone disease and other indicators among different groups were compared. Independent risk factors influencing newly diagnosed MM patients were identified using COX regression analysis. Results: Patients were categorized into three groups based on ALP cut-off points: Group 1 (ALP <70 U/L), Group 2 (ALP 70 to <120 U/L), and Group 3 (ALP ≥120 U/L). Significant differences were observed in lactate dehydrogenase, serum calcium, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and liver function indicators (including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, and γ-glutamyl transferase) among different ALP groups (P<0.05). ALP levels varied significantly among patients with different bone disease grades (P<0.05). Median survival times for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 25, 52, and 31 months, respectively. Group 2 exhibited significantly higher 3-year survival compared to the other two groups (P=0.006), while no significant difference was observed in 5-year survival among the three groups (P=0.51). Age, International Staging System staging, aspartate aminotransferase, ß2-microglobulin, ALP grading, and severe bone disease were identified as independent factors influencing survival in newly diagnosed patients (P<0.05). Conclusions: ALP levels are correlated with the prognosis of MM patients, and an ALP range of 70 to <120 U/L reflects a better survival expectation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Skeletal-related events (SREs), including the pathological fracture, surgical treatment or radiation of bone lesions, malignant spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia, are important considerations when managing metastatic bone tumors; however, owing to their rarity, the incidence of SREs in patients with Ewing sarcoma remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from 146 patients with Ewing sarcoma treated at a single institution from 2005 to 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 22.7 years. Fifty patients (34.2%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The primary outcome was the SRE-free rate among patients with Ewing sarcoma. Moreover, we identified the risk factors for SREs using univariate or multivariate analyses. RESULTS: During the observational period (median, 2.6 years), SREs occurred in 23 patients. Radiation to the bone, malignant spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia were documented as the initial SREs in 12 patients (52.2%), 10 patients (43.5%), and one patient (4.3%), respectively. The SRE-free rate was 94.2 ± 2.0, 87.3 ± 3.0, and 79.6 ± 3.8% at 1, 2, and 3 years after the initial visit, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed bone metastasis at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.41, p = 0.007), bone marrow invasion (HR = 34.08, p < 0.001), and local progression or recurrence after definitive treatment (HR = 3.98, p = 0.012) as independent risk factors for SREs. CONCLUSIONS: SREs are non-rare events that can occur during the treatment course for Ewing sarcoma, with an especially high incidence of malignant spinal cord compression. Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, especially in the bone or bone marrow, or with local progression or recurrence after definitive treatment, should be carefully monitored for the occurrence of SREs. The most effective methods to monitor the occurrence of SREs and new preventative therapies for SREs should be investigated in the future.
Assuntos
Hipercalcemia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Sarcoma de Ewing , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Sarcoma de Ewing/epidemiologia , Sarcoma de Ewing/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão/epidemiologia , Incidência , Compressão da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologiaRESUMO
In the absence of early detection and initial treatment, prostate cancer often progresses to an advanced stage, frequently spreading to the bones and significantly impacting patients' well-being and healthcare resources. Therefore, managing patients with prostate cancer that has spread to the bones often involves using bone-targeted medications like bisphosphonates and denosumab to enhance bone structure and minimize skeletal complications. Additionally, researchers are studying the tumor microenvironment and biomarkers to understand the mechanisms and potential treatment targets for bone metastases in prostate cancer. A literature search was conducted to identify clinical studies from 2013 to 2023 that focused on pain, performance status, or quality of life as primary outcomes. The analysis included details such as patient recruitment, prior palliative therapies, baseline characteristics, follow-up, and outcome reporting. The goal was to highlight the advancements and trends in bone metastasis research in prostate cancer over the past decade, with the aim of developing strategies to prevent and treat bone metastases and improve the quality of life and survival rates for prostate cancer patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year. METHODS: This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022. TRIAL STATUS: Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.
Assuntos
Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Adulto , Humanos , Coluna Vertebral , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer patients with bone metastases. In this meta-analysis, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were studied based on a de-escalation strategy in which the BMA dosing interval was prolonged from 4 to 12 weeks. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, ICHUSHI, and CINAHL were searched for articles on BMA dosing intervals from outcomes measured were the incidence of SRE and related various AEs. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT: The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of Zoledronic acid hydrate (ZA) (n = 2663) and six RCTs (n = 141) on BMA other than ZA. There was no difference in the incidence of SREs when comparing the dosing frequency of 12 versus 4 weeks for BMA (RR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.82-1.78], p = 0.33). Further, AEs related to treatment discontinuation were significantly less frequent with ZA given every 12 weeks than when given every 4 weeks (RR = 0.51 [0.30-0.89], p = 0.02). In particular, renal dysfunction leading to grade ≥3 or discontinuation of treatment with ZA occurred significantly less frequently with every 12-week dosing (RR = 0.33 [0.12-0.91], p = 0.33). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed no influence of BMA de-escalation on the incidence of SRE; nevertheless, AEs appeared to reduce with the de-escalated usage of ZA.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Real-world data on optimal cancer pain management remain scarce. We describe prescription patterns of analgesics in Japanese cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: National hospital-based claims data were analyzed. Adults with first diagnosis of cancer during 2015-2019 and first diagnosis of bone metastasis after the initial cancer diagnosis were included. Skeletal-related events (SREs) were identified with disease and receipt codes. RESULTS: Among the 40,507 eligible patients (age [mean ± SD], 69.7 ± 11.7 years), lung (25.3%), prostate (15.6%), breast (10.9%), and colorectal (10.7%) cancers were common primary tumors. Time (mean ± SD) between primary cancer diagnosis and bone metastases was 306.9 ± 490.4 days; median survival time from bone metastases was 483.0 days. Most patients used acetaminophen (62.7%, 117.5 days/year) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 75.3%, 170.0 days/year). Commonly used opioids included oxycodone (39.4%; 479.3 days/year), fentanyl (32.5%; 52.6 days/year), morphine (22.1%; 130.9 days/year), and tramadol (15.3%; 143.0 days/year). Internal medicine, surgery, respiratory, urology, and orthopedics treated 19.4%, 18.5%, 17.6%, 17.3%, and 13.0% of patients, respectively. Prescription patterns varied inter-department. Overall, 44.9% of patients developed SRE (bone pain requiring radiation [39.6%] or orthopedic surgery [2.9%]; hypercalcemia, 4.9%; pathological fracture, 3.3%; spinal cord compression, 0.4%). Analgesics use by patients with SREs was 1.8- to 2.2-fold in the postsymptomatic vs the presymptomatic period. SRE patients had numerically lower survival probabilities than non-SRE patients. Opioid use increased considerably in the month before death. CONCLUSION: In Japanese cancer patients with bone metastases, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and weak or strong opioids were commonly used; their use increased after SREs developed. Opioid use increased closer to death.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Neoplasias Ósseas , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Japão , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Dor , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Progression of bone metastases is the primary cause of death in prostate cancer, and skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone can impair patients' quality of life. Over the past decade, the development of cytotoxic agents, androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), and radioligand therapies has prolonged overall survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases and reduced the risk of SREs. The use of bone-modifying agents has also contributed to the reduced risk of SREs. Initial use of a cytotoxic agent, docetaxel, or an ARAT agent with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the current approach to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, there is no consensus on the optimal medication for upfront use in combination with ADT, or on specific patient selection. Recently, next-generation imaging modalities, such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography have been utilized to detect bone metastases at an early stage. In addition, metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has been attempted. In the future, patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer will be divided into subgroups and their treatment options will be tailored to their specific characteristics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Androgênios , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Qualidade de Vida , Imagem Corporal Total , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundárioRESUMO
Bone metastases are common in advanced breast cancer (BC) patients and increase the risk for skeletal-related events (SREs), which present a significant health and economic burden. Bone targeting agents (BTAs) can improve health-related quality of life by delaying or preventing SREs; nevertheless, a significant portion of eligible BC patients are not receiving this therapy. A bone health education needs assessment survey was conducted to examine cancer-related bone health awareness and to identify opportunities to improve bone health education. Direct-to-patient outreach was used to recruit adult BC patients in the USA self-reporting a diagnosis of bone metastasis within the past 3 years. Of the 200 patients, 59% experienced at least one SRE prior to survey participation (44% radiation to bone, 29% bone fracture, 17% spinal cord compression, 15% surgery to bone), and 83% were currently receiving a BTA. Awareness of general cancer bone health, protection strategies against SREs, and screening tests were low to moderate. Patients currently not receiving a BTA were least knowledgeable about cancer bone health, with only 40% aware of BTAs as a protective strategy, and only 26% were very or extremely satisfied with the information received from healthcare providers. Sixty-two percent of patients wanted to receive information by more than one mode of communication. Notable gaps in bone health education were observed in bone metastatic BC patients at risk for SREs, suggesting the need for earlier and more effective communication and education strategies to promote appropriate BTA use and better health outcomes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias da Mama , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Densidade Óssea , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Compressão da Medula Espinal/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Introduction: Spinal metastases (SM) are a frequent complication of cancer and may lead to pathologic vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) and/or metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Based on autopsy studies, it is estimated that about one third of all cancer patients will develop SM. These data may not provide a correct estimation of the incidence in clinical practice. Objective: This systematic review (SR) aims to provide a more accurate estimation of the incidence of SM, MESCC and pVCF in a clinical setting. Methods: We performed a SR of papers regarding epidemiology of SM, pVCF, and MESCC in patients with solid tumors conform PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science database using the terms epidemiology, prevalence, incidence, global burden of disease, cost of disease, spinal metastas*, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, pathologic fracture, vertebral compression fracture, vertebral metastas* and spinal neoplasms. Papers published between 1975 and august 2021 were included. Quality was evaluated by the STROBE criteria. Results: While 56 studies were included, none of them reports the actual definition used for MESCC and pVCF, inevitably introducing heterogenity. The overall cumulative incidence of SM and MESCC is 15.67% and 2.84% respectively in patients with a solid tumor. We calculated a mean cumulative incidence in patients with SM of 9.56% (95% CI 5.70%-13.42%) for MESCC and 12.63% (95% CI 7.00%-18.25%) for pVCF. Studies show an important delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis. Conclusions: While the overall cumulative incidence for clinically diagnosed SM in patients with a solid tumor is 15.67%, autopsy studies reveal that SM are present in 30% by the time they die, suggesting underdiagnosing of SM. Approximately 1 out of 10 patients with SM will develop MESCC and another 12.6% will develop a pVCF. Understanding these epidemiologic data, should increase awareness for first symptoms, allowing early diagnosis and subsequent treatment, thus improving overall outcome.
RESUMO
Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of bone-targeting agents for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. The anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab is approved for the prevention of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, real-world data are lacking on the impact of individual risk factors for SREs, specifically in the context of denosumab discontinuation. Purpose: We aim to identify risk factors associated with SRE incidence following denosumab discontinuation using a machine learning approach to help profile patients at a higher risk of developing SREs following discontinuation of denosumab treatment. Methods: Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record repository, patients diagnosed with incident bone metastases from primary solid tumors between January 1, 2007, and September 1, 2019, were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients received ≥ 2 consecutive 120 mg denosumab doses on a 4-week (± 14 days) schedule with a minimum follow-up of ≥ 1 year after the last denosumab dose, or an SRE occurring between days 84 and 365 after denosumab discontinuation. Extreme gradient boosting was used to develop an SRE risk prediction model evaluated on a test dataset. Multiple variables associated with patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, treatments, and denosumab exposures were examined as potential factors for SRE risk using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Univariate analyses on risk factors with the highest importance from pooled and tumor-specific models were also conducted. Results: A total of 1,414 adult cancer patients (breast: 40%, prostate: 30%, lung: 13%, other: 17%) were eligible, of whom 1,133 (80%) were assigned to model training and 281 (20%) to model evaluation. The median age at inclusion was 67 (range, 19-89) years with a median duration of denosumab treatment of 253 (range, 88-2,726) days; 490 (35%) patients experienced ≥ 1 SRE 83 days after denosumab discontinuation. Meaningful model performance was evaluated by an area under the receiver operating curve score of 77% and an F1 score of 62%; model precision was 60%, with 63% sensitivity and 78% specificity. SHAP identified several significant factors for the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models that predicted an increased SRE risk following denosumab discontinuation, including prior SREs, shorter denosumab treatment duration, ≥ 4 clinic visits per month with at least one hospitalization (all-cause) event from the baseline period up to discontinuation of denosumab, younger age at bone metastasis, shorter time to denosumab initiation from bone metastasis, and prostate cancer. Conclusion: This analysis showed a higher cumulative number of SREs, prior SREs relative to denosumab initiation, a higher number of hospital visits, and a shorter denosumab treatment duration as significant factors that are associated with an increased SRE risk after discontinuation of denosumab, in both the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models. Our machine learning approach to SRE risk factor identification reinforces treatment guidance on the persistent use of denosumab and has the potential to help clinicians better assess a patient's need to continue denosumab treatment and improve patient outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prognostic indicators, treatments, and survival estimates vary by cancer type. Therefore, disease-specific models are needed to estimate patient survival. Our primary aim was to develop models to estimate survival duration after treatment for skeletal-related events (SREs) (symptomatic bone metastasis, including impending or actual pathologic fractures) in men with metastatic bone disease due to prostate cancer. Such disease-specific models could be added to the PATHFx clinical-decision support tool, which is available worldwide, free of charge. Our secondary aim was to determine disease-specific factors that should be included in an international cancer registry. METHODS: We analyzed records of 438 men with metastatic prostate cancer who sustained SREs that required treatment with radiotherapy or surgery from 1989-2017. We developed and validated 6 models for 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 10-year survival after treatment. Model performance was evaluated using calibration analysis, Brier scores, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis to determine the models' clinical utility. We characterized the magnitude and direction of model features. RESULTS: The models exhibited acceptable calibration, accuracy (Brier scores < 0.20), and classification ability (AUCs > 0.73). Decision curve analysis determined that all 6 models were suitable for clinical use. The order of feature importance was distinct for each model. In all models, 3 factors were positively associated with survival duration: younger age at metastasis diagnosis, proximal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL, and slow-rising alkaline phosphatase velocity (APV). CONCLUSIONS: We developed models that estimate survival duration in patients with metastatic bone disease due to prostate cancer. These models require external validation but should meanwhile be included in the PATHFx tool. PSA and APV data should be recorded in an international cancer registry.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Algoritmos , Fosfatase Alcalina , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapiaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: There have been numerous advances in spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors, and minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) is becoming increasingly popular in Japan. MISt is a minimally invasive fixation procedure that temporarily stabilizes the spine, thereby reducing pain, preventing pathological fractures, and improving activities of daily living at an early stage. MISt may be useful given the recent shift toward outpatient cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 51 patients with metastatic spinal tumors who underwent surgery using MISt between December 2013 and October 2020. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score, an assessment of spinal instability, was used to determine the indication for surgery, and the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression scale was used for additional decompression. Results: The patients comprised 34 men and 17 women, and the mean age at surgery was 68.9 years. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 20.8 months, and 35 of 51 patients (67%) had died by the last survey. The mean operative time was 159.8 min, mean blood loss was 115.7 mL, and mean time to ambulation was 3.2 days. No perioperative complications were observed, although two patients required refixation surgery. Preoperatively, 37 patients (72.5%) were classified as Frankel grade E. There were no cases of postoperative exacerbation, and six patients showed improvement of one or more Frankel grades after surgery. The median duration of patient survival was about 22.0 months. Patients with breast, prostate, renal, and thyroid cancers had a good prognosis, whereas those with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancers had a poor prognosis. Conclusions: MISt can benefit patients who are ineligible for conventional, highly invasive surgery and is also suitable because cancer treatment is increasingly performed on an outpatient basis. Furthermore, choosing the right surgery for the right patient at the right time can significantly affect life expectancy.
Assuntos
Instabilidade Articular , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Atividades Cotidianas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Coluna VertebralRESUMO
Skeletal-related events (SREs) are complications of bone metastases and carry a significant patient and economic burden. Denosumab is a receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor approved for SRE prevention in patients with multiple myeloma and patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. In phase 3 trials, denosumab showed superiority to the bisphosphonate zoledronate in reducing the risk of first on-study SRE by 17% (median time to first on-study SRE delayed by 8.2 months) and the risk of first and subsequent on-study SREs by 18% across multiple solid tumor types, including some patients with multiple myeloma. Denosumab also improved pain outcomes and reduced the need for strong opioids. Additionally, a phase 3 trial showed denosumab was noninferior to zoledronate in delaying time to first SRE in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Denosumab has a convenient 120 mg every 4 weeks recommended dosing schedule with subcutaneous administration. Rare but serious toxicities associated with denosumab include osteonecrosis of the jaw, hypocalcemia, and atypical femoral fracture events, with multiple vertebral fractures reported following treatment discontinuation. After a decade of real-world clinical experience with denosumab, we are still learning about the optimal use and dosing for denosumab. Despite the emergence of novel and effective antitumor therapies, there remains a strong rationale for the clinical utility of antiresorptive therapy for SRE prevention. Ongoing studies aim to optimize clinical management of patients using denosumab for SRE prevention while maintaining safety and efficacy.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing momentum for the collaboration between multiple disciplines for the prevention and treatment of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. However, the effectiveness of multidisciplinary approaches remains unclear. Hence, we conducted an exploratory study to examine the impact of liaison treatment for metastatic spinal tumor (LMST) on the prevention of SREs among patients with a metastatic spinal tumor. METHODS: This study was an exploratory interrupted time series conducted in a single medical center. Overall, 1,043 patients with a metastatic spinal tumor diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2020 were included. The LMST was implemented in January 2014. The LMST team consisted of the orthopedic surgery, thoracic surgery, breast and thyroid surgery, clinical oncology, urology, and radiology departments. Monthly joint conferences were held for patients with spinal instability, and the incidence of SRE was measured at 6-month intervals. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, we identified 66 SRE incidences. After the implementation of the LMST, a level change of -5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.7 to 1.3, p = 0.11) was observed. Subsequently, a post-implementation trend change of -0.3% (95% CI: -2.0 to 1.5, p = 0.75) beyond the baseline was noted. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest both immediate and gradual effects of the introduction of the LMST on deterring the development of SREs. Our results support the global trend of introducing a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Vertebral metastases with limited epidural extension (VMLEE) are frequently encountered in cancer patients; they can cause severe and debilitating symptoms including pain and neurological impairment and are usually treated by radiotherapy. In this study, we mainly evaluated the safety of combined local treatments (CLT), associating radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with vertebroplasty and radiotherapy (RT) to treat VMLEE. Also, we aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of CLT on bone metastases palliation and long-term prevention of skeletal-related events. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed treatment complications, pain palliation, and skeletal complications after combined local treatments (CLT) for vertebral metastasis with limited epidural extension (VMLEE). RESULTS: Eighteen consecutive patients had CLT for 24 VMLEE, between June 2016 and January 2021. No major post-treatment complication was recorded. Nine patients had pain before the initiation of CLT. One month after CLT, only 3 patients had residual pain with a significant decrease of visual analogue scale (VAS), from 7.3 ± 2.4 to 2 ± 0 (p = .008), as well as the mean morphine milligram equivalent dose from 196.6 ± 135.7 to 38.5 ± 26, p = .008. Mean follow-up was 16.7 ± 11.5 months. Only one vertebra showed an increase of a preexisting vertebral fracture. Nine VMLEE had evidence of residual disease, including 2 which resulted in spinal cord compression (2, 11 months). CONCLUSION: CLT was safe and effective for pain palliation and long-term prevention of skeletal-related events for treatment of patients with VMLEE. The effectiveness of this combined treatment on tumor control and epidural involvement on the long term needs further investigation.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Coluna Vertebral , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Bone is a common site of metastases, particularly in advanced breast and prostate cancer. Skeletal related events associated with bone metastases include pathologic fracture, need for surgery/radiation to bone and cord compression. These events cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bisphosphonates as well as denosumab act on the bone microenvironment and reduce the rate of skeletal related events by approximately 25%-40%. Hence, these therapies are an important adjunctive therapy in cancer care. Despite the established efficacy and recommendations for their use in many international guidelines, these bone modifying agents are underutilized. This review examines the currently available guidelines on bone modifying agents in metastatic bone disease and summarizes their efficacy, risk and comparative benefits.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Bone is one of the preferential target organs of cancer metastasis. Bone metastasis is associated with various complications, of which bone pain is most common and debilitating. The cancer-associated bone pain (CABP) is induced as a consequence of increased neurogenesis, reprogramming and axonogenesis of sensory nerves (SNs) in harmony with sensitization and excitation of SNs in response to the tumor microenvironment created in bone. Importantly, CABP is associated with increased mortality, of which precise cellular and molecular mechanism remains poorly understood. Bone is densely innervated by autonomic nerves (ANs) (sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves) and SNs. Recent studies have shown that the nerves innervating the tumor microenvironment establish intimate communications with tumors, producing various stimuli for tumors to progress and disseminate. In this review, our current understanding of the role of SNs innervating bone in the pathophysiology of CABP will be overviewed. Then the hypothesis that SNs facilitate cancer progression in bone will be discussed in conjunction with our recent findings that SNs play an important role not only in the induction of CABP but also the progression of bone metastasis using a preclinical model of CABP. It is suggested that SNs are a critical component of the bone microenvironment that drives the vicious cycle between bone and cancer to progress bone metastasis. Suppression of the activity of bone-innervating SNs may have potential therapeutic effects on the progression of bone metastasis and induction of CABP.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight novel and impactful discoveries in systemic treatment of bone metastatic disease in solid tumors published within the past 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Major developments in systemic treatment of bone metastatic disease in solid tumors include evidence that decreasing frequency of dosing zoledronic acid in metastatic breast and prostate cancer maintains efficacy in preventing skeletal-related events while decreasing costs. The landmark findings on the use of Radium-223 to treat metastatic prostate cancer were reported in 2013. Recently, it has been found that not all systemic therapy combinations with Radium-223 are necessarily safe or effective unless bone-targeted therapy is also included in the regimen. More cost-effective dosing intervals of zoledronic acid and efficacy and safety nuances of combination radiopharmaceutical and chemotherapy treatment have been better delineated.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Rádio (Elemento)RESUMO
PURPOSE: The risk factors for skeletal-related events (SREs) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during treatment with bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are not yet well-understood. METHODS: The medical records of 238 consecutive NSCLC patients treated with BMAs, including zoledronic acid and denosumab, at the Chiba University Hospital from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed in the present study. SREs were defined as either pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, the need for bone irradiation or surgery, or hypercalcemia. The risk factors for earlier occurrence of the first SRE from the time of the first bone metastasis diagnosis after the initiation of BMA treatment were identified. RESULTS: Of the 238 included patients, 92% (n = 220) had a performance status (PS) of 0-2 at diagnosis of bone metastasis. Forty-eight (20%) patients developed at least one SRE. The most common first SRE was the need for bone irradiation surgery (n = 27, 56%). Significant risk factors included poor PS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.36; p = .024), male sex (HR: 2.17; p = .022), and the use of zoledronic acid (HR: 1.91; p = .032). The overall survival (OS) from the first bone metastasis diagnosis was 394 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 331-465). The OS of patients with PS 3 and 4 at the diagnosis of bone metastasis (median: 36 days; 95% CI: 13-50) was significantly (p < 0.0001) shorter than that of patients with PS 0-2 (median: 411 days; 95% CI: 354-558) (HR: 4.53; 95% CI: 2.62-7.35). CONCLUSIONS: Careful observation is needed for patients with the identified risk factors, which include poor PS and male sex, despite the BMA treatment.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Zoledrônico/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/complicações , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Compressão da Medula Espinal/complicações , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Bone represents the second most common site of distant metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The clinical course of DTC patients with bone metastases (BM) is quite heterogeneous, but generally associated with low survival rates. Skeletal-related events might be a serious complication of BM, resulting in high morbidity and impaired quality of life. To achieve disease control and symptoms relief, multimodal treatment is generally required: radioiodine therapy, local procedures-including surgery, radiotherapy and percutaneous techniques-and systemic therapies, such as kinase inhibitors and antiresorptive drugs. The management of DTC with BM is challenging: a careful evaluation and a personalized approach are essential to improve patients' outcomes. To date, prospective studies focusing on the main clinical aspects of DTC with BM are scarce; available analyses mainly include cohorts assembled over multiple decades, small samples sizes and data about BM not always separated from those regarding other distant metastases. The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent evidences and the unsolved questions regarding BM in DTC, analyzing several key issues: pathophysiology, prognostic factors, role of anatomic and functional imaging, and clinical management.