Automatic planning for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy based on function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization.

Objective.This study aims to develop a fully automatic planning framework for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy (AP-FLART).Approach.The AP-FLART integrates a dosimetric score-based beam angle selection method and a meta-optimization-based plan optimization method, both of which incorporate lung function information to guide dose redirection from high functional lung (HFL) to low functional lung (LFL). It is applicable to both contour-based FLART (cFLART) and voxel-based FLART (vFLART) optimization options. A cohort of 18 lung cancer patient cases underwent planning-CT and SPECT perfusion scans were collected. AP-FLART was applied to generate conventional RT (ConvRT), cFLART, and vFLART plans for all cases. We compared automatic against manual ConvRT plans as well as automatic ConvRT against FLART plans, to evaluate the effectiveness of AP-FLART. Ablation studies were performed to evaluate the contribution of function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization to dose redirection.Main results.Automatic ConvRT plans generated by AP-FLART exhibited similar quality compared to manual counterparts. Furthermore, compared to automatic ConvRT plans, HFL mean dose,V20, andV5were significantly reduced by 1.13 Gy (p< .001), 2.01% (p< .001), and 6.66% (p< .001) respectively for cFLART plans. Besides, vFLART plans showed a decrease in lung functionally weighted mean dose by 0.64 Gy (p< .01),fV20by 0.90% (p= 0.099), andfV5by 5.07% (p< .01) respectively. Though inferior conformity was observed, all dose constraints were well satisfied. The ablation study results indicated that both function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization significantly contributed to dose redirection.Significance.AP-FLART can effectively redirect doses from HFL to LFL without severely degrading conventional dose metrics, producing high-quality FLART plans. It has the potential to advance the research and clinical application of FLART by providing labor-free, consistent, and high-quality plans.

Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver treatments: A deep learning-based approach.

BACKGROUND: Dose deposition characteristics of proton radiation can be advantageous over photons. Proton treatment planning, however, poses additional challenges for the planners. Proton therapy is usually delivered with only a small number of beam angles, and the quality of a proton treatment plan is largely determined by the beam angles employed. Finding the optimal beam angles for a proton treatment plan requires time and experience, motivating the investigation of automatic beam angle selection methods. PURPOSE: A deep learning-based approach to automatic beam angle selection is proposed for the proton pencil-beam scanning treatment planning of liver lesions. METHODS: We cast beam-angle selection as a multi-label classification problem. To account for angular boundary discontinuity, the underlying convolution neural network is trained with the proposed Circular Earth Mover's Distance-based regularization and multi-label circular-smooth label technique. Furthermore, an analytical algorithm emulating proton treatment planners' clinical practice is employed in post-processing to improve the output of the model. Forty-nine patients that received proton liver treatments between 2017 and 2020 were randomly divided into training (n = 31), validation (n = 7), and test sets (n = 11). AI-selected beam angles were compared with those angles selected by human planners, and the dosimetric outcome was investigated by creating plans using knowledge-based treatment planning. RESULTS: For 7 of the 11 cases in the test set, AI-selected beam angles agreed with those chosen by human planners to within 20° (median angle difference = 10°; mean = 18.6°). Moreover, out of the total 22 beam angles predicted by the model, 15 (68%) were within 10° of the human-selected angles. The high correlation in beam angles resulted in comparable dosimetric statistics between proton treatment plans generated using AI- and human-selected angles. For the cases with beam angle differences exceeding 20°, the dosimetric analysis showed similar plan quality although with different emphases on organ-at-risk sparing. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a novel deep learning-based beam angle selection technique. Testing on liver cancer patients showed that the resulting plans were clinically viable with comparable dosimetric quality to those using human-selected beam angles. In tandem with auto-contouring and knowledge-based treatment planning tools, the proposed model could represent a pathway for nearly fully automated treatment planning in proton therapy.

Optimal beam angle selection and knowledge-based planning significantly reduces radiotherapy dose to organs at risk for lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer patients struggle with high toxicity rates. This study investigates if IMRT plans with individually set beam angles or uni-lateral VMAT plans results in dose reduction to OARs. We investigate if introduction of a RapidPlan model leads to reduced dose to OARs. Finally, the model is validated prospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive lung cancer patients treated with IMRT were included. For all patients, new IMRT plans were made by an experienced dose planner re-tuning beam angles aiming for minimized dose to the lungs and heart. Additionally, VMAT plans were made. The IMRT plans were selected as input for a RapidPlan model, which was used to generate 74 new IMRT plans. The new IMRT plans were used as input for a second RapidPlan model. This model was clinically implemented and used for generation of clinical treatment plans. Dosimetric parameters were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test or a 1-sided student's t-test. p < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: IMRT plans significantly reduced mean doses to lungs (MLD) and heart (MHD) by 1.6 Gy and 1.7 Gy in mean compared to VMAT plans. MLD was significantly (p < .001) reduced from 10.8 Gy to 9.4 Gy by using the second RapidPlan model. MHD was significantly (p < .001) reduced from 4.9 Gy to 3.9 Gy. The model was validated in prospectively collected treatment plans showing significantly lower MLD after the implementation of the second RapidPlan model. CONCLUSION: Introduction of RapidPlan and beam angles selected based on the target and OARs position reduces dose to OARs.