The oncogenic fusion protein EML4-NTRK3 requires three salt bridges for stability and biological activity.

Aim of study: Chromosomal translocations involving neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinases (NTRKs) have been identified in 20 % of soft tissue sarcomas. This work focuses on the EML4-NTRK3 translocation identified in cases of Infantile Fibrosarcoma, which contains the coiled-coil multimerization domain of Echinoderm Microtubule-like protein 4 (EML4) fused with the tyrosine kinase domain of Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 3 (NTRK3). The aim of the study was to test the importance of tyrosine kinase activity and multimerization for the oncogenic activity of EML4-NTRK3. Methods: These studies examined EML4-NTRK3 proteins containing a kinase-dead or WT kinase domain, together with mutations in specific salt bridge residues within the coiled-coil domain. Biological activity was assayed using focus assays in NIH3T3 cells. The MAPK/ERK, JAK/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT pathways were analyzed for downstream activation of signaling pathways. Localization of EML4-NTRK3 proteins was examined by immunofluorescence microscopy, and the ability of the EML4 coiled-coil domain to drive protein multimerization was examined by biochemical assays. Results: Activation of EML4-NTRK3 relies on both the tyrosine kinase activity of NTRK3 and salt-bridge stabilization within the coiled-coil domain of EML4. The tyrosine kinase activity of NTRK3 is essential for the biological activation of EML4-NTRK3. Furthermore, EML4-NTRK3 activates downstream signaling pathways MAPK/ERK, JAK/STAT3 and PKC/PLCγ. The disruption of three specific salt bridge interactions within the EML4 coiled-coil domain of EML4-NTRK3 blocks downstream activation, biological activity, and the ability to hetero-multimerize with EML4. We also demonstrate that EML4-NTRK3 is localized in the cytoplasm and fails to associate with microtubules. Concluding statement: These data suggest potential therapeutic strategies for Infantile Fibrosarcoma cases bearing EML4-NTRK3 fusion through inhibition of salt bridge interactions and disruption of multimerization.

Analysis of CD74 Occurrence in Oncogenic Fusion Proteins.

CD74 is a type II cell surface receptor found to be highly expressed in several hematological and solid cancers, due to its ability to activate pathways associated with tumor cell survival and proliferation. Over the past 16 years, CD74 has emerged as a commonly detected fusion partner in multiple oncogenic fusion proteins. Studies have found CD74 fusion proteins in a range of cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma, inflammatory breast cancer, and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To date, there are five known CD74 fusion proteins, CD74-ROS1, CD74-NTRK1, CD74-NRG1, CD74-NRG2α, and CD74-PDGFRB, with a total of 16 different variants, each with unique genetic signatures. Importantly, the occurrence of CD74 in the formation of fusion proteins has not been well explored despite the fact that ROS1 and NRG1 families utilize CD74 as the primary partner for the formation of oncogenic fusions. Fusion proteins known to be oncogenic drivers, including those of CD74, are typically detected and targeted after standard chemotherapeutic plans fail and the disease relapses. The analysis reported herein provides insights into the early intervention of CD74 fusions and highlights the need for improved routine assessment methods so that targeted therapies can be applied while they are most effective.

EWSR1 maintains centromere identity.

The centromere is essential for ensuring high-fidelity transmission of chromosomes. CENP-A, the centromeric histone H3 variant, is thought to be the epigenetic mark of centromere identity. CENP-A deposition at the centromere is crucial for proper centromere function and inheritance. Despite its importance, the precise mechanism responsible for maintenance of centromere position remains obscure. Here, we report a mechanism to maintain centromere identity. We demonstrate that CENP-A interacts with EWSR1 (Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1) and EWSR1-FLI1 (the oncogenic fusion protein in Ewing sarcoma). EWSR1 is required for maintaining CENP-A at the centromere in interphase cells. EWSR1 and EWSR1-FLI1 bind CENP-A through the SYGQ2 region within the prion-like domain, important for phase separation. EWSR1 binds to R-loops through its RNA-recognition motif in vitro. Both the domain and motif are required for maintaining CENP-A at the centromere. Therefore, we conclude that EWSR1 guards CENP-A in centromeric chromatins by binding to centromeric RNA.

Melatonin promotes differentiation and apoptosis of AML1-ETO-positive cells.

INTRODUCTION: Acute Myeloid Leukemia 1-Eight-Twenty-One (AML1-ETO) is an oncogenic fusion protein that causes acute myeloid leukemia. We examined the effects of melatonin on AML1-ETO by investigating cell differentiation, apoptosis, and degradation in leukemia cell lines. METHOD: We evaluated Kasumi-1, U937T, and primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML1-ETO-positive) cell proliferation by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. Flow cytometry and western blotting were used to evaluate CD11b/CD14 levels (differentiation biomarkers) and the AML1-ETO protein degradation pathway, respectively. CM-Dil-labeled Kasumi-1 cells were also injected into zebrafish embryos to determine the effects of melatonin on vascular proliferation and development and to evaluate the combined effects of melatonin and common chemotherapeutic agents. RESULTS: AML1-ETO-positive acute myeloid leukemia cells were more sensitive to melatonin than AML1-ETO-negative cells. Melatonin increased apoptosis and CD11b/CD14 expression in AML1-ETO-positive cells and decreased the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, together suggesting that melatonin induced cell differentiation. Mechanistically, melatonin degraded AML1-ETO by activating the caspase-3 pathway and regulating the mRNA levels of AML1-ETO downstream genes. Melatonin reduced the number of neovessels in Kasumi-1-injected zebrafish, suggesting that melatonin inhibits cell proliferation in vivo. Finally, combining drugs with melatonin inhibited cell viability. DISCUSSION: Melatonin is a potential compound for the treatment of AML1-ETO-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

Oncogenic driver FGFR3-TACC3 requires five coiled-coil heptads for activation and disulfide bond formation for stability.

FGFR3-TACC3 represents an oncogenic fusion protein frequently identified in glioblastoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer, oral cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and cervical cancer. Various exon breakpoints of FGFR3-TACC3 have been identified in cancers; these were analyzed to determine the minimum contribution of TACC3 for activation of the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion protein. While TACC3 exons 11 and 12 are dispensable for activity, our results show that FGFR3-TACC3 requires exons 13-16 for biological activity. A detailed analysis of exon 13, which consists of 8 heptads forming a coiled coil, further defined the minimal region for biological activity as consisting of 5 heptads from exon 13, in addition to exons 14-16. These conclusions were supported by transformation assays of biological activity, examination of MAPK pathway activation, analysis of disulfide-bonded FGFR3-TACC3, and by examination of the Endoglycosidase H-resistant portion of FGFR3-TACC3. These results demonstrate that clinically identified FGFR3-TACC3 fusion proteins differ in their biological activity, depending upon the specific breakpoint. This study further suggests the TACC3 dimerization domain of FGFR3-TACC3 as a novel target in treating FGFR translocation driven cancers.

Nefarious NTRK oncogenic fusions in pediatric sarcomas: Too many to Trk.

Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase (NTRK) genes undergo chromosomal translocations to create novel open reading frames coding for oncogenic fusion proteins; the N-terminal portion, donated by various partner genes, becomes fused to the tyrosine kinase domain of either NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3. NTRK fusion proteins have been identified as driver oncogenes in a wide variety of tumors over the past three decades, including Pediatric Gliomas, Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, Spitzoid Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, and additional tumors. Importantly, NTRK fusions function as drivers of pediatric sarcomas, accounting for approximately 15% of childhood cancers including Infantile Fibrosarcoma (IFS), a subset of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma (STS). While tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as larotrectinib and entrectinib, have demonstrated profound results against NTRK fusion-positive cancers, acquired resistance to these TKIs has resulted in the formation of gatekeeper, solvent-front, and compound mutations. We present a comprehensive compilation of oncogenic fusions involving NTRKs focusing specifically on pediatric STS, examining their biological signaling pathways and mechanisms of activation. The importance of an obligatory dimerization or multimerization domain, invariably donated by the N-terminal fusion partner, is discussed using characteristic fusions that occur in pediatric sarcomas. In addition, examples are presented of oncogenic fusion proteins in which the N-terminal partners may contribute additional biological activities beyond an oligomerization domain. Lastly, therapeutic approaches to the treatment of pediatric sarcoma will be presented, using first generation and second-generation agents such as selitrectinib and repotrectinib.

Proteomic analysis reveals dual requirement for Grb2 and PLCγ1 interactions for BCR-FGFR1-Driven 8p11 cell proliferation.

Translocation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) often leads to aberrant cell proliferation and cancer. The BCR-FGFR1 fusion protein, created by chromosomal translocation t(8;22)(p11;q11), contains Breakpoint Cluster Region (BCR) joined to Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1). BCR-FGFR1 represents a significant driver of 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome, or stem cell leukemia/lymphoma, which progresses to acute myeloid leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Mutations were introduced at Y177F, the binding site for adapter protein Grb2 within BCR; and at Y766F, the binding site for the membrane associated enzyme PLCγ1 within FGFR1. We examined anchorage-independent cell growth, overall cell proliferation using hematopoietic cells, and activation of downstream signaling pathways. BCR-FGFR1-induced changes in protein phosphorylation, binding partners, and signaling pathways were dissected using quantitative proteomics to interrogate the protein interactome, the phosphoproteome, and the interactome of BCR-FGFR1. The effects on BCR-FGFR1-stimulated cell proliferation were examined using the PLCγ1 inhibitor U73122, and the irreversible FGFR inhibitor futibatinib (TAS-120), both of which demonstrated efficacy. An absolute requirement is demonstrated for the dual binding partners Grb2 and PLCγ1 in BCR-FGFR1-driven cell proliferation, and new proteins such as ECSIT, USP15, GPR89, GAB1, and PTPN11 are identified as key effectors for hematopoietic transformation by BCR-FGFR1.

The oncogenic fusion landscape in pediatric CNS neoplasms.

Pediatric neoplasms in the central nervous system (CNS) are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children. Recent developments in molecular analyses have greatly contributed to a more accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of CNS tumors. Additionally, sequencing studies have identified various, often entity specific, tumor-driving events. In contrast to adult tumors, which often harbor multiple mutated oncogenic drivers, the number of mutated genes in pediatric cancers is much lower and many tumors can have a single oncogenic driver. Moreover, in children, much more than in adults, fusion proteins play an important role in driving tumorigenesis, and many different fusions have been identified as potential driver events in pediatric CNS neoplasms. However, a comprehensive overview of all the different reported oncogenic fusion proteins in pediatric CNS neoplasms is still lacking. A better understanding of the fusion proteins detected in these tumors and of the molecular mechanisms how these proteins drive tumorigenesis, could improve diagnosis and further benefit translational research into targeted therapies necessary to treat these distinct entities. In this review, we discuss the different oncogenic fusions reported in pediatric CNS neoplasms and their structure to create an overview of the variety of oncogenic fusion proteins to date, the tumor entities they occur in and their proposed mode of action.

Development of a degrader against oncogenic fusion protein FGFR3-TACC3.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3-transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 (FGFR3-TACC3), which has been identified in many cancers such as glioblastoma and bladder cancer, is a potent oncogenic fusion protein that induces constitutive activation of FGFR signaling, resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation. Although several tyrosine kinase inhibitors against FGFR are currently under development, resistance to such types of inhibitors in patients has become a concern. In this study, a chimeric molecule SNIPER(TACC3)-11 (5a) was developed and found to reduce FGFR3-TACC3 levels effectively. Compound 5a conjugated KHS108 (a TACC3 ligand) to an LCL161 derivative (11) (an inhibitor of apoptosis protein [IAP] ligand) with a PEG linker (n = 2). Mechanistical analysis showed that cellular IAP1 was required for the reduction of FGFR3-TACC3 levels. Consistent with the decrease in FGFR3-TACC3 levels, compound 5a suppressed the growth of FGFR3-TACC3 positive cells. Thus, compound 5a is a candidate therapeutic with a novel drug modality against cancers that exhibit FGFR3-TACC3-dependent proliferation and exerts pharmacological effects distinct from FGFR3 kinase inhibitors because it lacks substructures crucial for kinase inhibition.

Lysine specific demethylase 1 is a molecular driver and therapeutic target in sarcoma.

Sarcomas are a diverse group of tumors with numerous oncogenic drivers, and display varied clinical behaviors and prognoses. This complexity makes diagnosis and the development of new and effective treatments challenging. An incomplete understanding of both cell of origin and the biological drivers of sarcomas complicates efforts to develop clinically relevant model systems and find new molecular targets. Notably, the histone lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is overexpressed in a number of different sarcomas and is a potential therapeutic target in these malignancies. With the ability to modify histone marks, LSD1 is a key player in many protein complexes that epigenetically regulate gene expression. It is a largely context dependent enzyme, having vastly different and often opposing roles depending on the cellular environment and which interaction partners are involved. LSD1 has been implicated in the development of many different types of cancer, but its role in bone and soft tissue sarcomas remains poorly understood. In this review, we compiled what is known about the LSD1 function in various sarcomas, to determine where knowledge is lacking and to find what theme emerge to characterize how LSD1 is a key molecular driver in bone and soft tissue sarcoma. We further discuss the current clinical landscape for the development of LSD1 inhibitors and where sarcomas have been included in early clinical trials.

Roles of Histone Deacetylases in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Fusion Proteins.

Accurate orchestration of gene expression is critical for the process of normal hematopoiesis, and dysregulation is closely associated with leukemogenesis. Epigenetic aberration is one of the major causes contributing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where chromosomal rearrangements are frequently found. Increasing evidences have shown the pivotal roles of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in chromatin remodeling, which are involved in stemness maintenance, cell fate determination, proliferation and differentiation, via mastering the transcriptional switch of key genes. In abnormal, these functions can be bloomed to elicit carcinogenesis. Presently, HDAC family members are appealing targets for drug exploration, many of which have been deployed to the AML treatment. As the majority of AML events are associated with chromosomal translocation resulting in oncogenic fusion proteins, it is valuable to comprehensively understand the mutual interactions between HDACs and oncogenic proteins. Therefore, we reviewed the process of leukemogenesis and roles of HDAC members acting in this progress, providing an insight for the target anchoring, investigation of hyperacetylated-agents, and how the current knowledge could be applied in AML treatment.

The oncogenic transcription factor FUS-CHOP can undergo nuclear liquid-liquid phase separation.

Myxoid liposarcoma is caused by a chromosomal translocation resulting in a fusion protein comprised of the N terminus of FUS (fused in sarcoma) and the full-length transcription factor CHOP (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein, also known as DDIT3). FUS functions in RNA metabolism, and CHOP is a stress-induced transcription factor. The FUS-CHOP fusion protein causes unique gene expression and oncogenic transformation. Although it is clear that the FUS segment is required for oncogenic transformation, the mechanism of FUS-CHOP-induced transcriptional activation is unknown. Recently, some transcription factors and super enhancers have been proposed to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation and form membraneless compartments that recruit transcription machinery to gene promoters. Since phase separation of FUS depends on its N terminus, transcriptional activation by FUS-CHOP could result from the N terminus driving nuclear phase transitions. Here, we characterized FUS-CHOP in cells and in vitro, and observed novel phase-separating properties relative to unmodified CHOP. Our data indicate that FUS-CHOP forms phase-separated condensates that colocalize with BRD4, a marker of super enhancer condensates. We provide evidence that the FUS-CHOP phase transition is a novel oncogenic mechanism and potential therapeutic target for myxoid liposarcoma. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Functions of FGFR2 corrupted by translocations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma, originating from the biliary duct, represents a subset of liver cancer. With about 8000 new cases of cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed annually in the U.S., these fall into three categories: intrahepatic, peri-hilar, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Arising from the epithelium of the bile duct, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a universally fatal malignancy with very few treatment options. The poor prognosis and lack of molecular targeted therapies highlights ICC as a critical unmet medical need. With advances in sequencing technology, numerous chromosomal translocations have been discovered as drivers in cancer initiation and progression. Particularly in ICC, chromosomal translocations involving Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 (FGFR2) have been frequently identified, resulting in the creation of oncogenic fusion proteins. At the N-terminus, these fusion proteins share a nearly-identical FGFR2 moiety retaining an intact kinase domain and, at the C-terminus, a dimerization/oligomerization domain provided by different partner genes, including: Periphilin 1 (PPHLN1), Bicaudal family RNA binding protein 1 (BICC1), Adenosylhomocysteinase Like 1 (AHCYL1), and Transforming Acidic Coiled-Coil Containing Protein 3 (TACC3). A number of pre-clinical and clinical trials have shown the effectiveness of FGFR inhibitors in treating FGFR2 fusion-positive ICC patients. However, the efficacy of these inhibitors may be short-lived due to acquired resistance. In this review, we provide an overview of FGFR2 fusions, comparing their structures and mechanism of dimerization, examining the importance of FGFR2 as a partner gene, as well as highlighting the significance of alternative splicing of FGFR2 in these fusion proteins. In addition, we discuss various therapeutic options and their associated potencies in targeting these translocation-induced ICCs.

BCR: a promiscuous fusion partner in hematopoietic disorders.

Considerable advances have been made in our understanding of the molecular basis of hematopoietic cancers. The discovery of the BCR-ABL fusion protein over 50 years ago has brought about a new era of therapeutic progress and overall improvement in patient care, mainly due to the development and use of personalized medicine and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, since the detection of BCR-ABL, BCR has been identified as a commonly occurring fusion partner in hematopoietic disorders. BCR has been discovered fused to additional tyrosine kinases, including: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1), Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA), Ret Proto-Oncogene (RET), and Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2). While BCR translocations are infrequent in hematopoietic malignancies, clinical evidence suggests that patients who harbor these mutations benefit from TKIs and additional personalized therapies. The improvement of further methodologies for characterization of these fusions is crucial to determine a patient's treatment regimen, and optimal outcome. However, potential relapse and drug resistance among patients' highlights the need for additional treatment options and further understanding of these oncogenic fusion proteins. This review explores the mechanisms behind cancer progression of these BCR oncogenic fusion proteins, comparing their similarities and differences, examining the significance of BCR as a partner gene, and discussing current treatment options for these translocation-induced hematopoietic malignancies.