Thorough QT/QTc Evaluation of the Cardiac Safety of Enarodustat (JTZ-951), an Oral Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent, in Healthy Adults.

This study evaluated the effect of enarodustat on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. Enarodustat (20 and 150 mg [supratherapeutic dose]), placebo, and moxifloxacin (positive control, 400 mg) were administered orally to males and females (N = 54) in a crossover fashion. Continuous 12-lead Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) data were obtained before and after dosing, and blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessments of enarodustat, its circulating metabolite (R)-M2, and moxifloxacin. Central tendency analysis was performed for relevant ECG parameters, the relationship between individual-corrected interval from beginning of the QRS complex to end of the T wave in the frontal plane (QTcI, the primary end point) and plasma concentrations of enarodustat and (R)-M2 were assessed, and ECG waveforms were evaluated for morphological changes. The supratherapeutic dose resulted in 7- and 9-fold higher geometric mean maximum concentrations for enarodustat and (R)-M2, respectively, than the 20 mg dose. Based on time point analysis, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for QTcI did not exceed 10 milliseconds at any of the time points for either dose. Based on QTcI-concentration analysis, the slopes for enarodustat and (R)-M2 were not statistically different than 0, and the upper bounds of the 2-sided 90% CI for QTcI at the geometric mean maximum concentrations for the supratherapeutic dose were 1.97 and 1.68 milliseconds for enarodustat and (R)-M2, respectively. The lower bound of the 2-sided 90% CI for moxifloxacin was ≥5 milliseconds, demonstrating assay sensitivity. The study demonstrated no clinically relevant effect of enarodustat and (R)-M2 on cardiac repolarization. There was no evidence of any clinically significant effect on the PR interval and QRS duration, and ECG waveforms showed no new clinically relevant morphological changes.

A powerful test for the maximum treatment effect in thorough QT/QTc studies.

Parallel-group thorough QT/QTc studies focus on the change of QT/QTc values at several time-matched points from a pretreatment day (baseline) to a posttreatment day for different groups of treatment. The International Council for Harmonisation E14 stresses that QTc prolongation beyond a threshold represents high cardiac risk and calls for a test on the largest time-matched treatment effect (QTc prolongation). QT/QTc analysis usually assumes a jointly multivariate normal (MVN) distribution of pretreatment and posttreatment QT/QTc values, with a blocked compound symmetry covariance matrix. Existing methods use an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including day-averaged baseline as a covariate to deal with the MVN model. However, the ANCOVA model tends to underestimate the variation of the estimator for treatment effects, resulting in the inflation of empirical type I error rate when testing whether the largest QTc prolongation is beyond a threshold. In this article, we propose two new methods to estimate the time-matched treatment effects under the MVN model, including maximum likelihood estimation and ordinary-least-square-based two-stage estimation. These two methods take advantage of the covariance structure and are asymptotically efficient. Based on these estimators, powerful tests for QT/QTc prolongation are constructed. Simulation shows that the proposed estimators have smaller mean square error, and the tests can control the type I error rate with high power. The proposed methods are applied on testing the carryover effect of diltiazem to inhibit dofetilide in a randomized phase 1 trial.

Effects of Celecoxib on the QTc Interval: A Thorough QT/QTc Study.

PURPOSE: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor widely used in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Recently, nonclinical data on the inhibition of human ether-à-go-go-related gene potassium channels by celecoxib were reported, but there is no compelling evidence for this finding in humans. The aim of this study was to assess the potential effects of celecoxib on cardiac repolarization by conducting a thorough QT study, which was designed in compliance with the related guidelines. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, positive- and negative-controlled, crossover clinical study was conducted in healthy male and female subjects. Each subject received, in 1 of 4 randomly assigned sequences, all of the following 3 interventions: celecoxib 400 mg once daily for 6 days; a single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg, which served as a positive control to assess the assay sensitivity; and water without any drug, which served as a negative control. Serial 12-lead ECG and blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected periodically over 24 h. Individually RR-corrected QT intervals (QTcI) and Fridericia method-corrected QT intervals (QTcF) were calculated and evaluated. FINDINGS: Twenty-eight subjects were allocated to 1 of the 4 intervention sequences. The largest time-matched mean effects of celecoxib on the QTcI and QTcF were <5 ms, and the upper bounds of the 1-sided 95% CIs of those values did not exceed 10 ms. Moreover, none of the subjects had an absolute QTcI value of >450 ms or a change from baseline in QTcI of >60 ms after multiple administrations of celecoxib. The QTcI did not show a positive correlation with celecoxib concentrations in the range up to ~2700 µg/L. The overall effects of moxifloxacin on the QTcI and QTcF were enough to establish assay sensitivity. No serious adverse events were reported, with a total of 11 AEs reported in 8 subjects. IMPLICATIONS: Celecoxib caused no clinically relevant increase in the QT/QTc interval at the maximum dose level used in current practice settings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03822520.

Drug-induced Proarrhythmia and Torsade de Pointes: A Primer for Students and Practitioners of Medicine and Pharmacy.

Multiple marketing withdrawals due to proarrhythmic concerns occurred in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom in the late 1980s to early 2000s. This primer reviews the clinical implications of a drug's identified proarrhythmic liability, the issues associated with these safety-related withdrawals, and the actions taken by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and by regulatory agencies in terms of changing drug development practices and introducing new nonclinical and clinical tests to asses proarrhythmic liability. ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005. Since then, they have been adopted by many regional regulatory authorities and have guided nonclinical and clinical proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments during drug development. While this regulatory paradigm has been successful in preventing drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing the rare but potentially fatal polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia torsade de pointes from entering the market, it has led to the termination of drug development programs for other potentially useful medicines because of isolated results from studies with limited predictive value. Research efforts are now exploring alternative approaches to better predict potential proarrhythmic liabilities. For example, in the domain of human electrocardiographic assessments, concentration-response modeling conducted during phase 1 clinical development has recently become an accepted alternate primary methodology to the ICH E14 "thorough QT/QTc" study for defining a drug's corrected QT interval prolongation liability under certain conditions. When a drug's therapeutic benefit is considered important at a public health level but there is also an identified proarrhythmic liability that may result from administration of the single drug in certain individuals and/or drug-drug interactions, marketing approval will be accompanied by appropriate directions in the drug's prescribing information. Health-care professionals in the fields of medicine and pharmacy need to consider the prescribing information in conjunction with individual patients' clinical characteristics and concomitant medications when prescribing and dispensing such drugs.

Assessing QT/QTc interval prolongation with concentration-QT modeling for Phase I studies: impact of computational platforms, model structures and confidence interval calculation methods.

Modeling the relationship between drug concentrations and heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) change from baseline (C-∆QTc), based on Phase I single ascending dose (SAD) or multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies, has been proposed as an alternative to thorough QT studies (TQT), in assessing drug-induced QT prolongation risk. The present analysis used clinical SAD, MAD and TQT study data of an experimental compound, AZD5672, to evaluate the performance of: (i) three computational platforms (linear mixed-effects modeling implemented via PROC MIXED in SAS, as well as in R using LME4 package and linear quantile mixed models (LQMM) implemented via LQMM package; (ii) different model structures with and without treatment- or time-specific intercepts; and (iii) three methods for calculating the confidence interval (CI) of QTc prolongation (analytical and bootstrap methods with fixed or varied geometric mean concentrations). We show that treatment- and time-specific intercepts may need to be included into C-∆QTc modeling through PROC MIXED or LME4, regardless of their statistical significance. With the intersection union test (IUT) in the TQT study as a reference for comparison, inclusion of these intercepts increased the feasibility for C-∆QTc modelling of SAD or MAD to reach the same conclusion as the IUT analysis based on TQT study. Compared to PROC MIXED or LME4, the LQMM method is less dependent on inclusion of treatment- or time-specific intercepts, and the bootstrap CI calculation methods provided higher likelihood for C-∆QTc modeling of SAD and MAD studies to reach the same conclusion as the IUT based on the TQT study.

Cardiac Safety of Ozanimod, a Novel Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator: Results of a Thorough QT/QTc Study.

Ozanimod is a novel, selective, oral sphingosine-1-phosphate (1 and 5) receptor modulator in development for multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, positive-controlled, parallel-group thorough QT study characterized the effects of ozanimod on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. Eligible subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: ozanimod (escalated from 0.25 to 2 mg over 14 days) or placebo (for 14 days). A single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg or placebo was administered on days 2 and 17. The primary end point was the time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted mean QTcF (ΔΔQTcF). A total of 113/124 (91.1%) subjects completed the study. The upper limits of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF for both ozanimod 1 and 2 mg were below the 10-millisecond regulatory threshold. No QTcF >480 milliseconds or postdose change in QTcF of >60 milliseconds was observed. There was no evidence of a positive relationship between concentrations of ozanimod and its active metabolites and ΔΔQTcF. Although ozanimod blunted the observed diurnal increase in heart rate, excursions below predose heart rates were no greater than with placebo. Results demonstrate that ozanimod does not prolong the QTc interval or cause clinically significant bradycardia, supporting ozanimod's evolving favorable cardiac safety profile.

Recent developments in the science of proarrhythmic cardiac safety of new drugs.

Following marketing withdrawals of several drugs due to proarrhythmic safety concerns, the ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005 and have guided pre-approval cardiac safety assessments in multiple regulatory jurisdictions. While this S7B-E14 paradigm has successfully prevented drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing Torsades de Pointes entering the market, it has unintentionally resulted in the termination of development programs for potentially important compounds that could have exhibited a favourable benefit-risk balance. The Comprehensive In vitro Proarrhythmia Assay paradigm is currently attracting considerable attention as a solution to this problem. While much evaluative work in this new paradigm will be conducted in the non-clinical domain, human electrocardiographic assessments will remain an important component of the overall investigational strategy, possibly being conducted in Phase I trials employing exposure-response modelling. This article reviews recent developments in proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments of new drugs, their rationales, and current limitations.

Integration of modeling and simulation to support changes to ondansetron dosing following a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled thorough QT study.

Prolongation of the QT interval has been observed with ondansetron and other members of the 5-HT3 antagonist class. This is the first thorough QTc study of ondansetron conducted in accordance with ICH E14 guidelines, designed to investigate the effect of single intravenous (IV) doses of ondansetron on cardiac conduction compared to placebo and a positive control, moxifloxacin, in healthy subjects. Statistical analysis of dose-response showed the maximum mean difference in QTcF, compared to placebo and corrected for baseline (ddQTcF), was less than 10 milliseconds (ms) after an 8 mg IV dose and approximately 20 ms after the 32 mg dose, each infused over 15 minutes. The concentration-response (Cp-ddQTcF) model resulted in similar predictions for the 8 and 32 mg and was used to predict the maximum mean ddQTcF (upper 90% CI bound) of 9.2 (11.2) ms for 16 mg IV. As a result, single IV doses of ondansetron greater than 16 mg should no longer be used. Adult cancer patients, under 75 years, may receive up to a maximum initial 15-minute IV dose of 16 mg, prior to chemotherapy, followed by 2 additional IV or IM doses of 8 mg for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Evaluation of the effect of mericitabine at projected therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects: A thorough QT/QTc study.

Mericitabine, the di-isobutyl ester prodrug of the cytidine nucleoside analog, is a potent and selective hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitor. This thorough QT/QTc study evaluated the effect of mericitabine on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, 4-way crossover study. A total of 60 subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive a single dose of mericitabine 1,500 mg, 9,000 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg and placebo in randomly assigned treatment sequences, with at least 14 days between doses. The primary endpoint was the mean difference in baseline-adjusted QT interval using a study-specific correction method (QTcS) between mericitabine and placebo. The upper one-sided 95% confidence interval for the placebo-subtracted change from baseline in QTcS was <10 milliseconds and the mean difference from placebo was <5 milliseconds at all time points for both mericitabine doses. The positive control moxifloxacin caused a pronounced increase in QTcS that peaked 4 hours after oral administration. Furthermore, there was no trend of a concentration-dependent effect of mericitabine on QTcS. In conclusion, mericitabine does not have a clinically or statistically significant effect on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects at single doses up to 9,000 mg.

The IQ-CSRC prospective clinical Phase 1 study: "Can early QT assessment using exposure response analysis replace the thorough QT study?".

A collaboration between the Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development and the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium has been formed to design a clinical study in healthy subjects demonstrating that the thorough QT (TQT) study can be replaced by robust ECG monitoring and exposure-response (ER) analysis of data generated from First-in-Man single ascending dose (SAD) studies. Six marketed drugs with well-characterized QTc effects were identified in discussions with FDA; five have caused QT prolongation above the threshold of regulatory concern. Twenty healthy subjects will be enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled study designed with the intent to have similar power to exclude small QTc effects as a SAD study. Two doses (low and high) of each drug will be given on separate, consecutive days to 9 subjects. Six subjects will receive placebo. Data will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects ER models. Criteria for QT-positive drugs will be the demonstration of an upper bound (UB) of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of the projected QTc effect at the peak plasma level of the lower dose above the threshold of regulatory concern (currently 10 ms) and a positive slope of ER relationship. The criterion for QT-negative drug will be an UB of the CI of the projected QTc effect of the higher dose <10 ms. It is expected that a successful outcome in this study will provide evidence supporting replacement of the TQT study with ECG assessments in standard early clinical development studies for a new chemical entity.