Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 415
Filtrar
1.
Int Heart J ; 62(5): 1026-1034, 2021 Sep 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544973

RESUMO

Studies conducted in developed nations have shown that increase in life expectancy has brought with it a rise in the incidence and treatment of degenerative aortic and mitral heart valve diseases. Current standards recommend valve replacement among even some asymptomatic patients. In this research, we examine the epidemiology of valvular heart disease and rate of valve replacement in Taiwan, where life expectancy now stands at 80.69 years. Patients were enrolled based on claims from a widely used national database and categorized into cohorts defined by type of valve disease and, further, by valve replacements and type of valve (mechanical, porcine, or bovine). Data, including disease type, age, and gender, were analyzed to determine annual and cumulative incidence rates and prosthetic usage from 2000 to 2017. Results showed that across the cohorts, the cumulative incidence rate in 2017 was 3.59%, and in the aortic valve cohort, the percentage of surgical valve replacement for those ≥60 years was 6.99%. Compared with other developed nations, this demonstrates that incidence rates are slightly higher, yet surgical replacements are less than half that of other developed nations. This under-treatment of patients with valvular heart disease presents an important public health challenge in Taiwan.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Bioprótese/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/patologia , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan/epidemiologia
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(11): 1412-1422, 2021 03 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736823

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of aortic-valve disease in young patients still poses challenges. The Ross procedure offers several potential advantages that may translate to improved long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study reports long-term outcomes after the Ross procedure. METHODS: Adult patients who were included in the Ross Registry between 1988 and 2018 were analyzed. Endpoints were overall survival, reintervention, and major adverse events at maximum follow-up. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for survival and the need of Ross-related reintervention. RESULTS: There were 2,444 adult patients with a mean age of 44.1 ± 11.7 years identified. Early mortality was 1.0%. Estimated survival after 25 years was 75.8% and did not statistically differ from the general population (p = 0.189). The risk for autograft reintervention was 0.69% per patient-year and 0.62% per patient-year for right-ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reintervention. Larger aortic annulus diameter (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12/mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.19/mm; p < 0.001) and pre-operative presence of pure aortic insufficiency (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.68; p = 0.01) were independent predictors for autograft reintervention, whereas the use of a biological valve (HR: 8.09; 95% CI: 5.01 to 13.08; p < 0.001) and patient age (HR: 0.97 per year; 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99; p = 0.001) were independent predictors for RVOT reintervention. Major bleeding, valve thrombosis, permanent stroke, and endocarditis occurred with an incidence of 0.15% per patient-year, 0.07% per patient-year, 0.13%, and 0.36% per patient-year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure provides excellent survival over a follow-up period of up to 25 years. The rates of reintervention, anticoagulation-related morbidity, and endocarditis were very low. This procedure should therefore be considered as a very suitable treatment option in young patients suffering from aortic-valve disease. (Long-Term Follow-up After the Autograft Aortic Valve Procedure [Ross Operation]; NCT00708409).


Assuntos
Valvopatia Aórtica , Valva Aórtica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Reoperação , Transplante Autólogo , Adulto , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valvopatia Aórtica/diagnóstico , Valvopatia Aórtica/epidemiologia , Valvopatia Aórtica/cirurgia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/diagnóstico , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/epidemiologia , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/etiologia , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/classificação , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(9): e57, 2021 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33686809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We compared early and 2-year clinical outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) in a nationwide study based on claims data. METHODS: From December 2016 to November 2018, 3,173 patients underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. SAVR and CAVR were performed in 641 and 2,532 patients, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed in 640 patient pairs. RESULTS: Operative mortality rate was 2.8% without significant differences between the SAVR (3.4%) and CAVR (2.3%) groups (P = 0.324). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidities between the groups except for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. PPM implantation rate was significantly higher in the SAVR (3.8%) than in the CAVR group (0.9%) (P < 0.001). One- and two-year overall survival was 89.1% and 87.5%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups (SAVR group vs. CAVR grouP = 89.9% and 90.5% vs. 87.2% and 88.7%, respectively; P = 0.475). There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of cardiac death, stroke, aortic valve reoperation and infective endocarditis between the groups. Cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 6 months in the CAVR was 1.1%, and no patient required PPM implantation after 6 months. In the SAVR, the cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 0.5, one, and two years was 3.9%, 5.0% and 5.6%, respectively. The cumulative PPM implantation rate was higher in the SAVR group than in the CAVR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early and 2-year clinical outcomes between SAVR and CAVR were not different except for a high rate of permanent pacemaker implantation in the SAVR group.


Assuntos
Valvopatia Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos sem Sutura/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valvopatia Aórtica/mortalidade , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Pontuação de Propensão , República da Coreia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 162(4): 1049-1059.e1, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418636

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of an aortic root abscess on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in patients with active infectious endocarditis that was treated surgically. METHODS: From 1996 to 2017, 336 consecutive patients were treated with aortic valve or root replacement for infective endocarditis, including patients with (n = 179) or without (n = 157) a root abscess. Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons data warehouse, through chart review, patient surveys, and National Death Index data. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between groups except the root abscess group had a significantly lower prevalence of congestive heart failure and higher rates of prosthetic valve endocarditis. The abscess group had significantly more aortic root replacements as well as longer cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times. Operative mortality was 8.4% and 3.8% (P = .11) for the abscess and no abscess groups, respectively. Nevertheless, the root-abscess group had prolonged ventilation and longer intensive care unit stays. Kaplan-Meier survival was similar between root abscess and no abscess groups (10-year survival 41% vs 43%; P = .35). Significant risk factors for all-time mortality included age greater than 70 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55, 5.24), the presence of a root abscess (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.96), intravenous drug use (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.13, 2.89), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22, 2.42), renal failure requiring dialysis (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.30, 4.64), liver disease (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.65, 5.60), and postoperative sepsis (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.30, 6.93). The 10-year rate of reoperation was also similar between groups (5.9% vs 7.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Thorough and extensive debridement is critical for successful treatment of active endocarditis with root abscess. Bioprosthetic stented and stentless valves are valid conduits to treat endocarditis with root abscess.


Assuntos
Abscesso , Valva Aórtica , Endocardite , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Abscesso/diagnóstico , Abscesso/etiologia , Abscesso/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Endocardite/complicações , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/mortalidade , Endocardite/cirurgia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/classificação , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/diagnóstico , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/mortalidade , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Interv Cardiol ; 2020: 1807909, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33149728

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN 3 valves. Our aim was to assess the validity of this risk score in our patient population, as well as its applicability to patients receiving self-expanding valves. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 479 TAVR patients without preoperative pacemakers from November 2016 through December 2018. Preoperative risk factors included in the Emory risk score were collected for each patient: preoperative QRS, preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB), preoperative syncope, and degree of valve oversizing. Multivariable analysis of the individual variables within the scoring system to identify predictors of PPM placement was performed. The predictive discrimination of the risk score for the risk of PPM placement after TAVR was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that, of the 479 patients analyzed, 236 (49.3%) received balloon-expandable valves and 243 (50.7%) received self-expanding valves. Pacemaker rates were higher in patients receiving self-expanding valves than those receiving balloon-expandable valves (25.1% versus 16.1%, p=0.018). The Emory risk score showed a moderate correlation with pacemaker requirement in patients receiving each valve type, with AUC for balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves of 0.657 and 0.645, respectively. Of the four risk score components, preoperative RBBB was the only predictor of pacemaker requirement with an AUC of 0.615 for both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Conclusion. In our cohort, the Emory risk score had modest predictive utility for PPM insertion after balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR. The risk score did not offer better discriminatory utility than that of preoperative RBBB alone. Understanding the determinants of PPM insertion after TAVR can better guide patient education and postoperative management.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/classificação , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(14): e013973, 2020 07 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646262

RESUMO

Background As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to progress into younger patient populations, valve-in-TAVR (ViTAVR) may become a frequent consideration. Data on ViTAVR, however, are limited. This study investigated the outcome of ViTAVR in comparison to valve in surgical aortic valve replacement (ViSAVR), because ViSAVR is an established procedure for higher-risk patients requiring repeated aortic valve intervention. Methods and Results Clinical and procedural data of patients who underwent ViTAVR at 3 sites in the United States and Germany were retrospectively compared with data of patients who underwent ViSAVR at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. A total of 99 consecutive patients, 52.5% women, with a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 7.2 were identified. Seventy-four patients (74.7%) underwent ViSAVR, and 25 patients (25.3%) underwent ViTAVR. Balloon-expandable devices were used in 72.7%. ViSAVR patients presented with smaller index devices (21.0 versus 26.0 mm median true internal diameter; P<0.001). Significantly better postprocedural hemodynamics (median prosthesis mean gradient, 12.5 [interquartile range, 8.8-16.2] versus 16.0 [interquartile range, 13.0-20.5] mm Hg; P=0.045) were observed for ViTAVR compared with the ViSAVR. Device success, however, was not different (79.2% and 66.2% for ViTAVR and ViSAVR, respectively; P=0.35), as were rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (16.7% versus 5.4%; P=0.1). One-year-mortality was 9.4% and 13.4% for ViTAVR and ViSAVR, respectively (log-rank P=0.38). Conclusions Compared with ViSAVR, ViTAVR provides acceptable outcomes, with slightly better hemodynamics, similar device success rates, and similar 1-year mortality.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação/mortalidade , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234341, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32530931

RESUMO

Some patients with a bileaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) show significant increases in the transvalvular pressure drop and abnormal leaflet motion due to a pannus (an abnormal fibrovascular tissue) formed on the ventricular side, even in the absence of physical contact between the pannus and leaflets. We investigate the effects of the pannus shape (circular or semi-circular ring), implantation location and height on the leaflet motion, flow structure and transvalvular pressure drop using numerical simulations. The valve model considered resembles a 25 mm masters HP valve. The mean systolic pressure drop is significantly increased with increasing pannus height, irrespective of its implantation orientation. Near the peak inflow rate, the flow behind the pannus becomes highly turbulent, and the transvalvular pressure drop is markedly increased by the pannus. At the end of valve opening and the start of valve closing, oscillatory motions of the leaflets occur due to periodic shedding of vortex rings behind the pannus, and their amplitudes become large with increasing pannus height. When the pannus shape is asymmetric (e.g., a semi-circular ring) and its height reaches about 0.1D (D (= 25 mm) is the diameter of an aorta), abnormal leaflet motions occur: two leaflets move asymmetrically, and valve closing is delayed in time or incomplete, which increases the regurgitation volume. The peak energy loss coefficients due to panni are obtained from simulation data and compared with those predicted by a one-dimensional model. The comparison indicates that the one-dimensional model is applicable for the BMHV with and without pannus.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Simulação por Computador , Fibrose , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodinâmica , Hemorreologia , Humanos , Movimento (Física) , Desenho de Prótese
10.
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 39(3): 137-149, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32340853

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious disease with significant in-hospital mortality (15-30%) despite advances in medical and surgical therapy. AIMS: To perform a clinical characterization of patients undergoing cardiac surgery for IE and to identify factors that predict in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients with IE admitted between January 2006 and October 2017. RESULTS: The median age was 72 years. IE was acquired mainly in the community (69%), and involved the native aortic valve in 54% of patients, biological prosthetic valves in 22.1% and mechanical valves in 10.3%. Staphylococcus spp. (31.0%) were the most frequent etiological agents. Cardiac surgery was emergent in 29 patients, urgent in 108, and elective in eight. The main indications were heart failure (57.9%), large vegetations (20%), systemic embolism (17.2%) and valve dysfunction (15.2%). Overall, biological valves were implanted in 62.1% of patients and mechanical valves in 37.2%. A total of 19 patients (13.1%) died. Predictors of mortality were preoperative atrial fibrillation and lower left ventricular ejection fraction, postoperative severe valve regurgitation associated with cardiogenic shock, sepsis, septic shock associated with cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade, need for renal replacement therapy and, although without statistical significance, emergent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for better indicators to enable early identification of surgical candidates for IE, implementation of a heart team, and better surgical strategies, including more rapid intervention, more specific postoperative care, and optimal antibiotic therapy.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Endocardite/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/microbiologia , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Endocardite/microbiologia , Endocardite/mortalidade , Endocardite/patologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/mortalidade
11.
Clin Cardiol ; 43(5): 468-474, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31957895

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Leaflet thrombosis (LT, also called cusp thrombosis) detected by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is common in bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR). However, it remains contradictory whether MDCT-defined LT following bAVR is associated with hemodynamic deterioration and stroke. Thus, we performed the first meta-analysis to assess hemodynamic outcomes and updated the latest researches on the clinical outcomes of MDCT-defined LT after bAVR. HYPOTHESIS: MDCT-defined LT might be associated with worse hemodynamic and clinical outcomes after bAVR. METHOD: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched from inception to 15th April 2019. The fix-effect model was utilized to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcomes were hemodynamic stability indexes, including mean pressure gradient (MPG), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), paravalvular leak (PVL), and clinical heart failure. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which consisted of myocardial infarction, all-cause death, stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: Twelve studies with 4820 patients were included. The total prevalence of MDCT-defined LT was 9.7%. MDCT-defined LT was associated with a significantly increased risk of MPG (inverse variance 0.43, 95% CI: [0.30, 0.57]), MACCEs (OR 2.43, 95% CI: [1.45, 4.06]), stroke (OR 1.79, 95% CI: [1.03, 3.11]), and TIA (OR 4.09, 95% CI: [1.59, 10.54]). There were no differences for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT-defined LT after bAVR is associated with increased MPG and increased risk of adverse cerebrovascular events, including TIA and stroke. While LVEF, PVL, and clinical heart failure were similar between patient with and without LT.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Trombose Coronária/diagnóstico , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Trombose Coronária/etiologia , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Volume Sistólico , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda
12.
Acta Cardiol ; 75(3): 218-225, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30931804

RESUMO

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). There is limited data exploring differences in outcomes post-TAVI SEV vs. BEV. This study compared procedural success and 30-d clinical outcomes self-expandable valves (SEV), vs. balloon-expandable valves (BEV) for patients with severe AS.Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients receiving TAVI at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne between August 2009 and May 2018. The primary endpoints included procedural success, clinical outcomes and complication rates at 30-d.Results: Out of 151 patients undergoing TAVI, 70 received (46.3%) SEV (Medtronic CoreValve & Evolut-R) and 81 (53.6%) BEV (Edwards SAPIEN-XT & S3). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score did not differ between the groups, SEV (83.6 ± 4.9 years, STS 4.4 ± 3.8) compared to BEV (82.3 ± 5.8 years, STS 4.9 ± 4.9). Procedural success was similar SEV 67 (95.7%) vs. BEV 78 (96.3%). Rates of ≥ moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) at 30-d were significantly higher in SEV compared to BEV (6.7 vs. 0.0%; p = .02). SEV patients had higher rates of pacemaker insertion (36.4 vs. 9.5%; p = .001) and stroke rates (12.4 vs. 1.4%; p = .04) compared to BEV patients. The difference in 30-d mortality between the two groups was similar (SEV 4.6% vs. BEV 1.3%; p = .23).Conclusions: This real-world retrospective analysis demonstrates higher rates of ≥ moderate PAR, stroke and pacemaker insertion with SEV compared to BEV at 30 d post-TAVI for severe symptomatic AS.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Valva Aórtica , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/etiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Desenho de Prótese/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos
13.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 159(2): 416-427.e8, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31350026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Time trends in surgical valve selection have not been explored in detail in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in nationally representative data. Herein, we explore valve selection trends in the TAVR era using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. METHODS: Isolated first-time biological or mechanical aortic valve replacements (AVR) from 2004 to 2016 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were included. Patient characteristics were examined in the pre-TAVR era (2004-2007) and the post-TAVR era (2008-2016) using the year 2007 as the cut-point. Using a piece-wise regression analysis to model the relationship between time and type of valve used, a change-point analysis was performed to empirically determine the time of change in practice, both overall and in age-specific subgroups (≤60 years and >60 years). RESULTS: In total, 214,390 patients underwent isolated primary mechanical or biological AVR from 2004 to 2016. The patients' mean age increased slightly between the 2 eras (67.1 vs 68.6 years, P < .001), whereas the proportion of mechanical AVRs decreased (24.8% vs 12.2%, P < .001). Piece-wise regression demonstrated that the proportion of mechanical valves decreased over time. An empirically estimated slope change-point was found after the first quarter 2010; from 2004 to 2009, the overall proportion of mechanical valves was decreasing quickly (-2.81%/year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -3.03% to -2.60%), compared with 2010 to 2016. The early decline was steeper for younger patients (-4.21%/year, 95% CI, -4.74 to -3.69) compared with older patients (-1.44%/year, 95% CI -1.64 to -1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Use of mechanical AVR declined significantly from 2004 to 2016 and was decreasing before the introduction or the approval of TAVR in the United States.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
PLoS One ; 14(8): e0221263, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425536

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We examined trends, characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) among patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain from 2001 to 2015. We also identified factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM) in both groups of patients according to the implanted valve type. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database for patients aged 40 years or over. We selected admissions of patients whose medical procedures included SMVR. We grouped hospitalizations by COPD status. RESULTS: Over 43,024 patients identified, 83.63% underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement and 16.37% bioprosthetic valve (6.71% and 7.78% with COPD, respectively). The incidence of SMVR decreased for mechanical valves and increased for bioprosthetic valves over time in both groups of patients. The incidence of SMVR admissions was lower among COPD patients than in those without COPD, both for mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. IHM decreased significantly over time, regardless of the type of valve, in both groups of patients. COPD was associated with a significant increase in IHM, but only among patients who underwent bioprosthetic SMVR (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.73). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of mechanical SMVR decreased while that of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time in both groups of patients. COPD patients were less surgically operated than non-COPD patients for both valve types. In COPD patients, bioprosthetic SMVR was proportionally more used than mechanical SMVR. Mortality decreased over time for both valve types in patients with and without COPD. COPD increased in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing a biological SMVR.


Assuntos
Bioprótese/tendências , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/tendências , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
BMC Res Notes ; 12(1): 491, 2019 Aug 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study to determine the clinical pattern and prevalence of heart disease in pregnancy at the first established cardio-maternal unit in Iraq over the last 4 years; since January 2015 till May 2019. Data are presented as number and percentage. RESULTS: A total of 252 pregnant women presented to cardio-maternal unit included in this study. According to the collected data, among the main diagnosis of heart disease during pregnancy was valvular heart disease 34.1%, followed by congenital heart disease 30.5%, cardiomyopathy 29.8%, pulmonary hypertension 4%, and ischemic heart disease 1.6%. Among subtypes of the main heart diseases in pregnant women, the most clinical pattern was: the prosthetic heart valve (26.7%) in valvular heart disease, both atrial septal defect and ventricular septal defect (35%) in congenital heart disease, and peripartum cardiomyopathy (76%) among cardiomyopathies.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/epidemiologia , Comunicação Interatrial/epidemiologia , Comunicação Interventricular/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Comunicação Interatrial/diagnóstico , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Comunicação Interventricular/diagnóstico , Comunicação Interventricular/cirurgia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades Hospitalares , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Iraque/epidemiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/cirurgia , Prevalência
16.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 8(3): 269-278, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078182

RESUMO

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement is the focus of much enthusiasm as the future of therapy for mitral valve disease. Despite technological advances, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction from the valve prosthesis remains an important issue. In this review the authors discuss the pathophysiology of LVOT obstruction in both the surgical and transcatheter experience, imaging evaluation preprocedure, outcomes to date, and therapeutic options.


Assuntos
Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/patologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/epidemiologia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/prevenção & controle
17.
J Card Surg ; 34(7): 555-562, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31124598

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recent national trends have demonstrated increased use of bioprosthetic mitral valves. The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes as well as readmission rates for mechanical vs bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (mMVR vs bMVR). METHODS: All patients undergoing MVR from 2011-2017 were included in a single center data set that was obtained retrospectively from a prospectively maintained cardiac surgical database. RESULTS: The total MVR patient cohort consisted of 828 patients, including bMVR (n = 522) and mMVR (n = 306). There was no significant difference in the operative (30-day) mortality between bMVR and mMVR (8.6% vs 6.5%; P = .31). The unadjusted estimated 1-year mortality was significantly higher for the bMVR group (19.8% vs 13.7%, P = .04) and this trend continued for the estimated 5-year mortality (35.1% vs 18.7%; P = .001). Valve prosthesis choice (bMVR vs mMVR) did not have a risk-adjusted impact on operative mortality at 30 days (P = .58); however 1-year (P = .05) and 5-year (P = .05) mortality remained significantly higher for the bMVR group. Propensity matching revealed a higher mortality rate on follow-up in the bMVR (26.7% vs 18.2%, P = .03) but no difference at 30 days or 1 year. There was no difference in hospital readmissions over 5 years CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical prostheses may confer a survival benefit in patients undergoing MVR. With emphasis on patient education and anticoagulation compliance, mMVR remains an efficacious option.


Assuntos
Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Am J Cardiol ; 124(1): 63-69, 2019 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31030971

RESUMO

MitraClip therapy has shown increasing use since it was commercially adopted among US hospitals in October 2013. However, the relation of institutional MitraClip volume with outcomes is unclear. This study sought to examine the association between hospital volume and outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified all patients who underwent a MitraClip procedure and categorized hospitals into tertiles based on their annual procedure volume: low (≤3 procedures/year), medium (4 to 13/year), and high (≥14/year) volume centers. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of institutional MitraClip volume on in-hospital and 90-day outcomes, respectively. From 2014 to 2015, a total of 3,420 procedures were performed at 266 hospitals with a median annual procedural volume of 5 per hospital. Low (n = 81), medium (n = 86), and high (n = 99) volume hospitals performed 147 (4.3%), 403 (11.8%), and 2,870 (83.9%) MitraClip procedures, respectively. The low versus high hospital volume was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality (7.8% vs 3.0%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.64; p = 0.04), acute myocardial infarction (10.2% vs 2.2%; aOR 2.93; p = 0.02), and acute respiratory failure (19.3% vs 7.7%; aOR 2.24; p = 0.02) during index admission as well as 90-day all-cause readmissions (37.8% vs 26.6%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.54; p = 0.03), and 90-day infective endocarditis (2.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio 10.06; p = 0.003). In conclusion, low hospital MitraClip volume is an independent determinant of worse outcomes including in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/mortalidade , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
19.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 158(5): 1317-1328.e1, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30857820

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (VIV TAVR) can result in high residual gradients that are associated with increased mortality. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) has been shown to improve residual gradients following VIV TAVR; however, factors influencing the results of BVF have not been studied. METHODS: BVF was performed in 75 patients at 21 centers. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was performed to identify variables that were associated with lower final transvalvular gradient. RESULTS: Surgical valves with a median true internal diameter of 18.5 mm (interquartile range, 17.0-20.5 mm) were treated with VIV TAVR in conjunction with BVF using balloon-expandable (n = 43) or self-expanding (n = 32) transcatheter heart valves with a median size of 23 mm (interquartile range, 23-23 mm). There were no aortic root disruptions, coronary occlusions, or new pacemakers; in-hospital or 30-day mortality was 2.6% (2 out of 75). Final mean transvalvular gradient was 9.2 ± 6.3 mm Hg, but was significantly lower when BVF was performed after VIV TAVR compared with BVF first (8.1 ± 4.8 mm Hg vs 16.9 ± 10.1 mm Hg; P < .001). After adjusting for timing of BVF (ie, before or after VIV TAVR), transcatheter heart valve size/type, surgical valve mode of failure, true internal diameter, and baseline gradient and BVF balloon size, performing BVF after VIV TAVR (P < .001) and using a larger BVF balloon (P = .038) were the only independent predictors of lower final mean gradient. CONCLUSIONS: BVF can be performed safely and results in reduced residual transvalvular gradients. Performing BVF after VIV TAVR and using larger balloon appears to achieve the best hemodynamic results.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valvuloplastia com Balão/métodos , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Reoperação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação/instrumentação , Reoperação/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Estados Unidos
20.
Eur J Public Health ; 29(4): 674-680, 2019 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30778536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: we aim to examine trends in the incidence of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among women and men in Spain from 2001 to 2015; compare in-hospital outcomes for mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR by gender and; to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM) after SAVR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2001-15. We included patients that had SAVR as procedure in their discharge report. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to assess the impact of gender on the outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR. RESULTS: We identified 86 578 patients who underwent SAVR (40% women). Incidence of SVAR was higher in men (incidence rate ratio 1.57; 95%CI 1.55-1.59). In 2001, 73.36% of the men and 71.57% of women received a mechanical prosthesis; these proportions decreased to 43.04% in men and 35.89% in women in 2015, whereas bioprosthetic SAVR increased to 56.96% and 64.11%. After PSM we found that IHM was higher in women than in matched men for mechanical (8.94% vs. 6.79%; P < 0.001) and bioprosthetic (6.51 vs. 5.42%; P = 0.001) SAVR. The mean length of hospital stay was longer (19.54 vs. 18.74 days; P < 0.001) among females than males undergoing mechanical SAVR. Higher IHM after SAVR was associated with older age, comorbidities (except diabetes and atrial fibrillation), concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and emergency room admission. CONCLUSIONS: This nation-wide analysis over 15 years of gender-specific outcomes after SAVR showed that, after PSM women have significantly higher IHM after mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR than men.


Assuntos
Bioprótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/mortalidade , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Previsões , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA